Loading...
Min 05/04/1982 327 Wichita Falls, Texas Memorial Auditorium Bldg. May 4, 1982 Items I & 2 The Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls , Texas , met in regular session on the above date in the Council Room of the Memorial Auditorium Building at 8:30 o'clock A.M. , with the following members present. Gary D. Cook Mayor Gene Shearman John W. Hampton Carol G. Russell Aldermen Craig A. Wilson Howard M. Morris Horace 0. Boston Stuart Bach City Manager H. P. Hodge, Jr. City Attorney Wilma J. Thomas City Clerk Fred Werner Chief Accounting Officer - - - - - - - - - - The invocation was given by Baxton Bryant, Wesley United Methodist Church. - - - - - - - - - - Item 3 Moved by Alderman Boston that minutes of the meeting held April 20, 1982, be approved. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. - - - - - - - - - - Items 4a - 8d Items 4b, 5a, and 7a were moved to the regular agenda. Moved by Alderman Morris that the remaining items on the consent agenda be approved. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman. Item 4a ORDINANCE NO. 50-82 AN ORDINANCE RELEASING AND ABANDONING THE WEST HALF OF A UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 3A, BLOCK 105A, HIGHLAND ADDITION TO THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS. Ayes : Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None Item 4c ORDINANCE NO. 51-82 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING AND ABANDONING DONNA LANE FROM LORETTA STREET TO BURKBURNETT HIGHWAY AND RETAINING A UTILITY EASEMENT. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None Item 4d ORDINANCE NO. 52-82 AN ORDINANCE RELEASING AND ABANDONING A TEN (10) BY FORTY-EIGHT (48) FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT IN BLOCK 12, DITTOE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS. 328 Item 4d, cont'd. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None Item 6a The bid for a mower tractor for the Street Division was awarded to Case Equipment Company in the amount of $22,884. Ayes : Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None Item 8 Minutes of the meetings ofthe following boards and commissions were received. a. Planning Board - April 14, 1982 Ayes : Mayor CookAldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None b. Traffic Commission - April 21, 1982 Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None c. Park Board - April 22, 1982 Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None d. Traffic Safety Council - April 7, 1982 Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None - - - - - - - - - - Item 4b Discussion was held on a proposed ordinance closing and abandoning a portion of Washington Street, as requested by Wilson Manufacturing Company. Alderman Wilson asked if this makes sense to give them equal property to what they have just recently purchased? The City Manager explained that when an easement is no longer needed, the property goes 50-50 to abutting owners. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that if the Council finds that the public no longer has any use of this land, the abutting property goes to each property owner. These owners have originally bought and paid for it anyway. Alderman Shearman asked if it will work a hardship on anyone to close this street? Roger McKinney, Director of Planning, stated that Washington Street intersects North Scott. It is not a through street. ORDINANCE NO. 53-82 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF WASHINGTON STREET BETWEEN LOT 7, BLOCK 33 AND LOT 1, BLOCK 50, ORIGINAL TOWNSITE OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS AND RETAINING A UTILITY EASEMENT. Moved by Alderman Morris that Ordinance No. 53-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None - - - - - - - - - - 329 Item 5a Discussion was held on a proposed resolution awarding the contract for the construction of a maintenance facility at the landfill . Alderman Morris asked what kind of problems will be caused by the reduction of the wall height from 18 to 16 feet? Ernest Lillard stated that the eave height would take care of the problems they would have. The tallest machine they will be putting in there will be 13-1, feet. The sixteen feet is needed inside the building when you raise the elevating scraper bowl above the top of the machine. Alderman Morris also asked about the deletion of the door closures. Mr. Lillard stated that they should not have been on there because they are automatic closures. RESOLUTION NO. 74-82 RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MAINTENANCE FACILITY AT THE SANITARY LANDFILL. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls has advertised for bids for the construction of a maintenance facility at the Sanitary Landfill ; and, WHEREAS, six bids were received, and it is found that the bid of M & F Litteken Company in the amount of $28,695.00 is the lowest responsible bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Said bid of M & F Litteken Company in the amount of $28,695.00 is hereby accepted, and the City Manager is authorized to execute a contract with M & F Litteken Company for the construction of such improvement. Moved by Alderman Morris that Resolution No. 74-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None - - - - - - - - - - Item 7a Discussion was held on a proposed ordinance approving two change orders on the Bellevue Park improvement project. Alderman Morris asked if something will be torn out, or has it been constructed for the handicapped? Bill Hursh, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated there is no loss of material on this change. Alderman Morris suggested that if we had caught it before the job was bid, perhaps it would have cost us less. He also had a question, pertaining to the breakdown on the contractor's cost. He stated that twenty percent on subcontractors ' fees seems high. It is normally five percent. Alderman Shearman asked if this is wholesale or retail ? We would hate to see someone tack 20 percent on retail prices. He also asked about getting a handrail coming into the auditorium. Alderman Wilson asked if we had a consultant on this project? Mr. Hursh stated that we did not. Mr. Hursh went to his office to get information concerning how the prices the contractor has given them compare to wholesale prices. At the end of the meeting he presented the information to Alderman Morris. Alderman Shearman stated that it seems he wants the best of two worlds , and you can't have it in this business . Alderman Morris asked if we could put a maximum amount on what a contractor could add to a sub? The City Manager stated that we could. RESOLUTION NO. 81-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDERS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 TO CONTRACT FOR BELLEVUE PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. 330 Item 7a, cont'd. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls and C. D. Graham Construction Company, Inc. , as contractor, entered into a contract dated March 2, 1982, wherein said contractor agreed to construct certain improvements in Bellevue Park; and, WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable to execute Change Orders No. 1 and 2, which will increase the contract amount by $2,300.06. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THEICITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Change Orders No. 1 and No. 2, copies of which are attached hereto, to the contract with C. D. Graham Construction Company, Inc. , for the construction of Bellevue Park improvements, are hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute the same for the City of Wichita Falls. Moved by Alderman Hampton that Resolution No. 81-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Morris , and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : Alderman Shearman - - - - - - - - - - Item 9a was deleted because of illness in Mr. Delmar Bennett's family. Item 9b, the appearance of Dr. Eldo Jones, was also deleted. - - - - - - - - - - Item 9c Allen Palmatary appeared concerning a desired revision to the Motor Vehicle Salvage and/or Junk Yard ordinance. Mr. Palmatary operates Al 's Automotive at 2305 Sheppard Access Road. He was denied a license by the Salvage/Junk Yard Commission because he did not have the required screening fence. He stated that when the ordinance was under consideration he asked the Council to give the Committee the authority to waive anything called for. When he went before the Committee, it was not in the ordinance, and they did not have that power. Mr. Palmatary stated that he has a security problem in that if a screening fence is constructed, police will not be able to see if someone is in there as they drive by. He requested that the ordinance be revised to allow the Commission to waive the screening requirements for that portion of the applicant's property used as a vehicle depository for impoundments. Mr. Palmatary stated that hi sbusiness is located on a road not traveled much. People jump these fences and steal parts. He stated that he is the only one on that road that is in the business of wrecker and storage vehicles. Alderman Wilson noted that Tommy Alexander has a storage facility on this road. Mr. Palmatary stated that he has had a burglary since this came up. Alderman Shearman asked Mr. Ryckoff for his suggestion. Joe Ryckoff, Code Enforcement officer, stated that if we have an ordinance, it should be for everyone's benefit. He does not feel one should be given preference over another. Mr. Palmatary stated that he could show the Committee his problem by police records. Alderman Morris asked Mr. Palmatary if he has anymore problems than others? Mr. Palmatary stated that he does not own these vehicles. They are the property of other people. Alderman Hampton pointed out that all of the rest of them have cars that they don't own. Perhaps the others have taken care of their security problems. Perhaps they have hired people to watch the property. Mr. Palmatary stated this is just more expense. If he can keep his costs down, it is less cost to the people. He would pass on the cost of the guard to the people. He stated that he has been at this location 20 years. The Council moved on to the next item. - - - - - - - - - - 331 Item 10a Discussion was held on a proposed ordinance to extend the parking meter zone to the 800 block of 6th Street next to the County Courthouse Annex and the Atrium Buildings. Andy Lee, 1702 Tilden, appeared representing private enterprise for owners of the Atrium Office Building and First Wichita National Bank. He stated that the question has come up of closing the south lane of 6th Street between Lamar and Scott. The Atrium Office Building was designed for the front door entry to face North on 6th Street. They do not need any additional parking. They purchased the Owen larking Garage for that purpose, They do not need any emergency zones The other problem with parking spaces there is the fire hazard. If a fire broke out, the fire trucks could come in the front of this building and fight a fire. All equipment is set up in the elevator shaft. If a fire broke out in the Court House Annex, they would have to come from the alley or roof since there are no windows in that building. Mr. Lee also stated that there is a contract between the owners of the Atrium regarding a beautification streetscape plan from Community Development Block Grant funds. Mr. Lee stated that to deface the streetscape plan with parking meters would be a shame. Sixth Street is four lanes downtown. The First Wichita Bank chose the location they did because they were trying to eliminate traffic congestion. They spent a lot of money on this and beautification. With First Wichita using the northbound lane on payday, and parking meters on the southbound lane, he wonders if the two middle lanes could handle the traffic. He feels that closing the South lane would be a traffic hazard The Midtown 2000 plan adopted in 1976 calls for moderate beautification. He b�lieves we need to have the city look at these lanes on a payday Friday. Mr. Lee stated that he has not spent a lot of time on an alternate plan. A lot of this problem is because of a lack of parking by Wichita County Court House. They have parking West of the bus station, which is free. They have parking for the Court House for jurors. When there is no jury, that is free parking. He does not feel that Wichita County planned to have sufficient parking. He believes they are expecting the City of Wichita Falls to solve their problem. He stated that ten spaces will be for the annex. In no way will it help the Atrium. As an alternate plan the City should look to Lamar Street West of First Wichita Bank drive-in facility across from the bus station. The alternate plan would keep the accessibility of 6th Street open. Alderman Morris asked Acting Fire Chief Jim Jameson what his opinion is of the fire accessibility? Chief Jameson stated that they would have problems, but no more so there than any other downtown building. The City Manager stated that Jack Griffin, Acting Director of Traffic and Transportation, has arranged the parking so that it won't detract from the aesthetics of the building. Mr. Bach also stated that part of the demand for parking is coming from the Atrium Building. Acting Director of Traffic an d Transportation Jack Griffin showed the proposed parking layout. No maneuvering will be necessary in the traffic lanes because there will be 18 feet between cars. There will be one meter post with dual heads to cut down on the numbers of posts used, with a 30-minute time limit. There will be a loading zone on Lamar Street. Mr. Griffin stated that this parking lane has been closed for the past year anyway because of construction, and it has not caused any problems in traffic. They have had many complaints from prople trying to get license plates. The County realizes that they have created their own problem, but the City feels it is our responsibility to help solve the problem. Alderman Shearman asked how far it is to where there is parking on 6th Street West? Mr. Griffin stated there is no parking on 6th Street. The City Manager noted that the County's parking lot on the North side of 6th Street is full all the time. Mr. Griffin explained that they will stripe the South lane for a right turn only. They will- also install overhead signs. Alderman Morris asked how many parking meters there would be? Mr. Griffin stated there would be nine. Alderman Wilson felt that reducing lanes would be a problem. Mr. Griffin explained that only crew labor would be involved in this change. They already have the signs and parking meters in the shop which have been removed from other areas. 332 Item 10a, cont'd. Alderman Hampton asked how much money has been spent on the Atrium? Mr. Lee stated it was probably in excess of two million dollars. Alderman Hampton commented that these businessmen have planned for parking, a sprinkler system, etc. The County did not plan. We are now faced with a sudden right turn at Scott. This would move it back one block. This action would have a tendency of discouraging others from spending money downtown. Alderman Wilson agreed, stating that we should encourage every avenue to provide private dollars to be spent downtown. Aldermen Shearman and Morris agreed. Mayor Cook asked Mr. Lee to express to the owners of the Atrium and the First Wichita Bank the appreciation of the Council for the work done, and money spent. Moved by Alderman Shearman that this matter be tabled. Motion seconded by Alderman Morris, and carried unanimously. - - - - - - - - - - Item 10b A proposed ordinance was presented amending the Code of Ordinances pertaining to advertisement for competitive bids and awarding city contracts. ORDINANCE NO. 54-82 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 2-5 AND 2-6 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES CONCERNING ADVERTISEMENT FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS AND REQUIREMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS IN AWARDING CITY CONTRACTS. Moved by Alderman Boston that Ordinances No. 54-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman. Alderman Morris noted that since- the City Manager is working on the administrative portion of this now, why can't we do all of this in one step? The City Manager stated that one policy was drafted which was not acceptable to himself, but he feels we don't need to be out of legal compliance. Alderman Shearman suggested that the word "shall " be placed in Section 2 (1) of the ordinance, instead of the word "may", in regard to requiring a financial statement. The City Manager stated that this is for the option of having someone file it who does not have a proven track record. Alderman Shearman stated that he feels it should be for everyone. "May" just won't cut it. Alderman Hampton noted that this leaves it up to a personal decision. Financial status can change at times. You are putting this blame on the department. He feels "shall " would be better, and have it uniform for everyone. Alderman Shearman stated that everyone should have a current financial statement. Alderman Wilson asked what any public work or improvement encompasses? City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that a public work would include a building, fire station, parks, streets, drainage. Equipment and supplies would not be included. Alderman Shearman asked if a chemical is a public work or improvement? It was stated that it is not. Neither is a fire truck. According to the Charter, anything over $1000 has to be submitted to bids. Alderman Morris had some questions about some of these things. Mayor Cook asked when we would have an administrative policy? Fred Werner, Chief Accounting Officer, stated that we are trying to find another purchasing agent. The new purchasing agent may have some input. The City Manager stated that this would be an administrative policy, which he would be glad to provide the Council with. They are trying to come up with some standard specifications, processes, etc. It could be ready in maybe two weeks. Mayor Cook asked why it would not be appropriate to incorporate it with this matter this morning? The City Manager stated that they might be putting something in concrete that might need to be changed at times. Mayor Cook stated that he is referring to pre-bid conferences and something they would not get into the specifi- cations. 333 Item 10b, cont'd. Alderman Wilson commented on the performance bond being a statutory requirement. Alderman Morris asked why we would not require a performance bond on the fire truck? It is a small cost for protection. The City Attorney stated that he had always construed both sections as public works projects. The City Manager stated that this ordinance pertains to public works, and not equipment. Alderman Wilson stated that not having performance bonds on this equipment has created some problems for us. If we have a specified performance bond somebody will deliver what we want. Alderman Morris stated that he would like to see something in the administrative policy which addresses this. Alderman Morris noted that the present ordinance provides that the bidder "shall " furnish a financial statement. He suggested that Section 2 of the proposed ordinance be deleted, and the remaining sections be renumbered. Aldermen Boston and Shearman accepted that amendment to their motion and second. The motion for passage of Ordinance No. 54-82, deleting Section 2, was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None - - - - - - - - - - Item 10c A proposed ordinance was presented waiving certain ordinances concerning municipal enforcement of deed restrictions on Lots 22 and 23, Block 61, Southland Addition. ORDINANCE NO. 55-82 ORDINANCE WAIVING ORDINANCES 3457, 3647, 3648 AND 3699 AS TO ONE TRACT OF LAND. Moved by Alderman Hampton that Ordinance No. 55-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman. Alderman Russell noted that five percent of the property owners objected. Does the state statute designate an acceptable level percentage? Roger McKinney, Director of Planning, stated that the notification was not in regard to deed restrictions, but to the replat. Mayor Cook stated that the ordinance does not limit it to the types of facility. He stated that he would not want it to be used as a fast food or late night facility. Once this is waived, it leaves it open to any commercial structure. The City Manager stated that the ordinance could be waived subject to the construc- tion of an office type facility. Moved by Alderman Hampton that an amendment be approved with the waivers subject to construction of an office structure on the site. Motion seconded by Alderman Morris , and carried unanimously. The motion for passage of Ordinance No. 55-82, as amended, was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None - - - - - - - - - - 334 Item 11a Discussion was held on a proposal to hire an engineering firm for work on sewer improvements along U. S. Highway 277, and along a drainage easement in University Park area. Alderman Shearman asked how many engineers we have? Joe Smith stated there is only one in Public Utilities available to do engineering work. Public Works also has only one registered engineer to do design work. Public Works has two survey crews , each consisting of a three-man party. The City Manager stated that they do street and drainage survey work. Ernest Lillard explained that they do grade control alignment, also subdivision control and investigative design. These two survey crews have a backlog, except in winter months when construction has slowed down. Alderman Morris asked if we could hire better or more crews ourselves, and get the same amount of work done instead of hiring engineering crews for each job? Ernest Lillard stated if we could hire qualified people, yes , but it takes many years to train these investigative crews. From the standpoint of engineers, it is very difficult for us to obtain them. Salary is a factor. It is not competitive with a lot of beginning salaries. No one is competitive with the energy companies. Municipal work is not one of the more attractive positions to a new engineer. They can do the work, but he is not sure they can gear up and get the staff together in a timely fashion. You also have to consider what would these people be doing when capital programs are no longer needed. They try to keep a staff to keep them busy day after day and year after year. RESOLUTION NO. 75-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ENGINEERING FIRM OF CORLETT, PROBST, AND BOYD FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 277 AND WEST ALONG DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN UNIVERSITY PARK AREA. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls proposes to construct sanitary sewer improvements along U.S. Highway 277, and West along a drainage easement in the University Park area; and, WHEREAS, the City wishes to employ the firm of Corlett, Probst, and Boyd to provide engineering services for these improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: The firm of Corlett, Probst, and Boyd has agreed to provide engineering services according to the attached agreementat such fee as stipulated by Curve A on the attach- ment taken from the Texas Society of Professional Engineers General Engineering Services Publication. The agreement is hereby accepted and the City Manager is authorized to execute the agreement for the City of Wichita Falls. Moved by Alderman Russell that Resolution No. 75-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None (Alderman Shearman was out of the room. ) - - - - - - - - - - Item 11b A proposed resolution was presented authorizing the City Manager to execute the required contracts , agreements, and certifications for the joint certification package for urban transportation planning. Alderman Morris asked what we are authorizing the City Manager to execute? Roger McKinning, Director of Planning, mentioned the equal employment opportunity plan, clean air certification, etc. No money is being spent. Any money spent will have to go through normal channels of awarding bids, etc. 335 Item 11b, cont'd. The Mayor Cook questioned some of the items listed in the proposed program. City Manager stated that you over-program these things. Mayor Cook confirmed that they will be based on needs and availability, and will come back to the Council for approval . RESOLUTION NO. 76-82 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT CERTIFICATION PACKAGE FOR URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE REQUIRED CONTRACTS, AGREEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS. ired for: WHEREAS, in the Wichita Falls area Federal assistance may be req unce for public (1) street and highway construction, (2) capital and operating assista mass transportation, and (3) transportation planning; and, WHEREAS, Joint Certification of Urban Trans portation Planning Process by the ministration (FHWA) and Urban Mass Transportation Administration Federal Highway Ad ederal capital , operating and planning assistance; and� (UMTA) is prerequisite for F juires endorsement by the WHEREAS, the Joint Certification process re( ST2rLa� Improvement Metropolitan Planning Organ zation (MpO) of the Tram ified Wor�_­PrOgram; and, with Annual Element, and the ��n signated on June 2, 1981 EE29s� ichita Falls, Texas has been de is urbanized area; andq WHEREAS, the City Of W' Organization for the Wichita Fal as the MetrOPOlitan Planning ted the designation. OF WICHITA WHEREAS, the City Of W ichita Falls has accep CITY RESOLVED By THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE Process NOW THEREFORE, BE IT insportation planning 74AS, THAT: 0, the Urban Trz City of Wichita Falls FALLS, E 4ing documents nt with the ECTION I. The follo� d and consiste 1979; ���orsed as being vali t1l dated September 12, une 'reby e MpO, dated 3 are he hensive Plan' phase agreemen Falls as I mmission Con1pre 11continull. f Wichita Regional planning Co reements - ating City O,n Nortex nt design nt betwel �re e�T 1983. Md AgreeM6 Agreeme t 1982- an 981; and an ruary Elemen 2 1 With An I dated Feb nua and the MPO 5 .,qew%:­ - ral''I'll. I I 1-11-ill"�­ 30, 1983. Im roVement Pro 1982 - September TranS ortatiOn October 1, contract�5 ram te required vities, act' an Planning Unified \AorV P 0 ed to execu I anni ng ",�O."r. authoriZ ortatiOn Pe MetroPOI't 3. U m as th Manager transP continue, The Ci.tytjons for . g to perfor ECTION f1ca I Is continul assed. certi ita Fa _S2 be P and of \gi ch 76 vote. agreements Cit tAO. and for the y that Res olutlo" ed bY the fO rr's and Organl7atiOn- Morri S Russell , and carri p \AAlso".) Mo Moved bY Alderman Alderman too,) ussell Moti On seconded b' NJ dermen Shearman, �kamP Mayor COOV to Ayes'. 'Boston lAanager lan. to t, jAOne 'ng the City space P assis 19aYs' utAon a thoriz' and open services, Do \qe S\"An(3 Sys ten ,,posed resO reatAO a not rec bandle are d that W \4e do 11c, bel d on a Ang a parys staff tostate . nce \4bAch ,t Over- was - ar adequate ager ri e t con .or prep Man y _pe -me to Of Whic6 D* cusslo t i t have an lbe City and e If UA tha s t e t' the IS contrac I �.rtAse care tment A th ($14 a -f \�e do" nts eype be \Nor eYecute ved *1 , d,.,oartme some ave to \�s Depar COO,,< as . these .-, firm bas \Ae b par tbe staff . s In jbj S etc- that the that kHEREA MaYOr A encl e . t US- t A a\<,es -) t 100"' - tends accep de�lc ass's a does no t be -I n tbi s- tance L have f-.Vfm to loo �\e d tb a t oil thi s ,,c\'% as des Agn. jAe stateMbO forma Nopl ossessq nder- . , THE or \1 ects. use a FALLS, TEXAS, 9 VrO3 deSi gn t\xese lbel 9 A all to do al A That certai Consul tant- IdIninistered by t Justice' PrOvidin� estab7's' a video author iled to execu other necess t( Texas, arY docu, rimina7 Y equip ent to n the City anager is Moved bY AlderMar, Neso7ution No cne grant agreernent and a 77 Motion seconded by 78-82 be Passed. erman Morris, and carried by the fO770wing vote. 336 Item 11c, cont'd. Mayor Cook noted that $8000 seems like a lot to tell them what we have, and listen to the Public three times. Roger McKinney stated that inventories hav, completed. He will also have to look at the physical facilities . They the consultant to attend the public hearings. Mayor Cook stated thp, are hiring a professional landscape architect. Alderman Shearman asked if it would be feasible f- work together on a project, and save money? Roap-- what they are doing. This project involves Alderman Wilson asked if the these figures? The City Manan- Alderman Hamptor last five years? Tulsa, Fort at thp %6'. �'\ -foe-'\ T C nj Q� O�.\01\6 sqs\) awt as ,,A d r eso so opose .�, N PIC t-a-rl\ beCooe "10k Coo be-f 9 AAS to On 'Oece &'�VL S -�) '(S. ce t�\e POO, pel I 13� seVv Or a esel(\ e C r se ry Ce ta'rl stigation, J Or '(\uar toV �nve I e0s j� and 3a h �y�-Ns s tar A 92)?. jar- tudJ o'f a t J aCtOV dated A ros s anuary a �ue t\,\e'f uire jueA Cos 3 n "o. opose J Or �uy, req e��er-ti\4e vesoAut-%() \\ PIC 2 be for '\ (), SUC 1-3, ongel' tA%e Ace COXQ by ratAo\ 3anuar' oe Ope �ter r A ng" and a er . Sery ended t and a r \\ea C SqS9 aaJ, /,as A "Z13 dence an )ar a O� NA ae-r0en provided Je C111 �V W17 � e\J i V t)Re b(. and, )Ras been 16 Of IN -?:ENS 1 nati Of\') y-esOA utA on erat'o Ce 1\1 t\\A S op e'rvi WHERE, �jnaA deter\ of Nct, the *I oC ty'l C S 13, Wichi ta Fa I \�\AE�Rv NS, a COPY ��Soo�:'D uA Wry Jeyas U-Jr.. �Aay BV- ?,e 9 19,31 by days ar A V\9- J\�Vgo��' cember 9� f thA-ftJ bA A c y\e ic WHEREAS, �jAled on De a and P\1 -�NS' 66A ti On evidence e7ement in thE V NVA-S, "E tar i��. ti On Of 43�d) � the ?UbA A period 0 to sectiol r an a ta t actor ded io sen WHEREAS Vurs d �\IeA Cos e)�tey) pre Recre uant be passed. ation SJ ropose \,,,t\\er ga Qte. ervi, t\-\e . t\ereby study 5 investA on m- in WHEREAS, company Is ,urther that ?,esOluti the fOlAO*inq lAorris and the deVe7 the 1'qS2 f or , and carried by �Wson' OPMent NA derman p FALL NOW3 �Aov ed by NAderman Boston' �Aa%PtOn' \usseAl 3 "EXAS, seconded by S THERErORC Shearman, The C- THA T: tAayOr COOV" NI ler\neyl Dahlberg 'ty /qanager Nyes' Boston and OPen 3 and . jAone applicable to SPace Partne "ays- policies Plan rs' 7n at, ution estabA' ing osed reso d advisory groups. ocOng up and fAA notes held On a Propsionsq an nf OrMal coomi s ble, \0th or by an ,,scussion \Na boards, lot of trou e, t to city s a telephO" ,time" hat thA s 1,m to aPP�y by tic. need �qhen aPPO' stated t the s tureaucra on you - formatiOn' )on allO\4 . method 1 P'Aderiman \Ails�ou" t thi s f in 5t as s' 0 bits 0 ft W)UA d �Ae stated tha mum bits f "formatl forms. Other \,4ay- e are IM111' some stanlarl or some stated that they \Ae need to get teers for the Clean NIderman "amPto ant for a board. advertised for VOILI"' the City ring an aPPIA 5tated that they coyis i de �r Stuart Bach ' comission As very representative Of City Manage and that 80-82 community Commission, 10 Appol"Mms �O Cl�� [S Nmlcn� ZS��BLIS"ING POLIC'R� Gp\OUPS. provide RESOLUT101 S 0 ADVISO ita Valls \1jishes t0ons and BoAns, COWISSION A" n of the City O� \AAChty boards, comissi )4�Ep'f the Board of Alderme to participate On AS,tunities for Citizens greater oppor and, Other advisory bodies; 339 ,If 13 cont'd. lita Falls wishes to establish eM an of the City Of W'c�citizen participation on its Alderme the Board Of representative and5 WHEREAS, for encouraging - ry bodies; �ncourage system or methodology Ons and other advisO hita Falls wants to e ion and a commIssi Ci ty Of W ic rd, cOmn'Iss various boards, of Aldermen of the ts aPPOi ntees in boa F WICV11TA WH,?'F-AS, the Board tive involvement Of 1 ti OF THE CJT� 0 d construc OERM the active an advisory group business. VEO 5� THE j3OARg OF AL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL ity boards, commissions and advisory FALLS, TEM 5 THAT* icy shall apPly to all The following Pol hall be ry groups s prior nincls. d advisO, 60 days 0 e .,,ions an 30 to Sing the groups'. and comml for from th appri tive to ,ncle- vac""- boards5 other means Along w1ation rel%orY grouP on City - and by filled. I inforT or adv'1 �ublli�c' ngs t di tiona Mmission media be Mus j,gs, ad d CO and oppen' the news . opening ar ancAeS through v cancy 0 'es and open fected bo 0 Cized a of the af li that a vacanc' grouP tiMe Of such .,jtjeS isory t e blic 115i b1 co ission or adV ene,al Y" d reSPO Mo es a ed. city board' t e dutl Ovid s e P oilltoent to a advisory tiolls tj on Or J� L,\"- see� aV \1 -La ssjon 0"Mi�n�a to \J'ro\�g Or or 9 C00i -0- Y\i ng t V41 5 idefed -1 croup -ti 'Boa 01 P11 dey'Men ti Of\ A oca V wo te 6 Cl \jided Ve-fso'os so Coll$ a jel bodi es ty\e ?ioard Pf 0 0al be "0001 Ila .of� w the ai 0� Or OS �jest dat' t\)ose agey' eMbe*f at�01\ req Se .oj\ bj �AV 0 I. &tl A-\C 339 Item 11f, cont'd. WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls wishes to establish a system or methodology for encouraging representative citizen participation on its various boards, commissions and other advisory bodies; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls wants to encourage the active and constructive involvement of its appointees in board, commission and advisory groups business. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: The following policy shall apply to all City boards, commissions and advisory groups : Publicizing Vacancies and Openings Vacancies and openings on City boards , commissions and advisory groups shall be publicized through the news media and by other means for from 30 to 60 days prior to the time that a vacancy or opening must be filled. Along with apprising the general public of such vacancies and openingsadditional information relative to the duties and responsibilities of the affected board, commission or advisory group shall be provided. Nominations Persons wishing to seek appointment to a City board, commission or advisory group may be so considered through: 1. Self-nomination 2. Recommendation by a local group or organization 3. Recommendation by the affected City Board, commission or advisory group or any member of those bodies 4. Recommendation by the City Manager 5. Recommendation by the Mayor or any member of the Board of Aldermen 6. Nomination or recommendation by other means All nominations and recommendations shall be submitted on application forms provided by the City and must be received within announced acceptance dates. Upon request, assistance will be provided in completing application forms. Nomination does not guarantee appointment. Appointment authority rests with the Mayor and Board of Aldermen as prescribed by resolution, ordinance or other applicable statue or enactment. Appointment In making appointments to City boards , commissions and advisory groups, the Mayor and Board of Aldermen shall : 1. Consider the interests, experience, knowledge, talents, abilities and other qualities and qualifications of nominees for the vacancies or openings to be filled; and 2. Attempt to make such appointments as will make the City's boards, commissions and advisory groups representative of all segments and elements of the populace of the City of Wichita Falls; and 3. Make appointments without regards to race, color, religion, age, sex or national origin. Appointee Oath At the first board, commission or advisory group meeting attended subsequent to acceptance of appointment, an oath to serve the public's best interests shall be administered to new appointees. The oath shall be administered by either the Board of Aldermen liaison or City staff representative assigned to the respective board, commission or advisory group. Attendance Appointment to a City board, commission or advisory group carries with it the responsibility and obligation to attend and participate in meetings. Those 340 Item Ilf, cont'd. appointees who miss three (3) consecutive meetings without good cause or who attend so infrequently as to indicate a lack of interest in or inability to serve on a particular board, commission or advisory group may be replaced by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Terms of Appointment Unless waived by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen, no appointee shall serve more than six (6) consecutive years on a particular board, commission or advisory group. The intent of this policy is to afford greater opportunities for citizens to participate on City boards, commissions and advisory gorups and to periodically infuse those bodies with fresh ideas and thinking. Consideration may be given to re-appointment of a former appointee (who has already served six consecutive years) upon expiration of a period of time equal to one full term on the pertinent board, commission or advisory group. Administrative Procedures The City Manager is hereby authorized to prepare and implement such forms, procedures and other instruments as are deemed necessary to carry out the policies set forth herein. Moved by Alderman Shearman that Resolution No. 80-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Morris, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None - - - - - - - - - - Item 12a Discussion was held on bids for a high pressure sewer cleaner. Three bids were received; however, none of the bidders met specifications. It was recommended that all bids be rejected, and that permission be granted to re-advertise for bids. Alderman Morris asked if the exceptions were noted on the bid form? Joe Smith, Director of Public Utilities, stated that they were. He felt they did not meet specifications because of the exceptions. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that exceptions always bother him. They all have to bid on the same basis. The law, as he understands it, says that the Board of Aldermen has the authority to waive minor exceptions to the specifications. When it goes beyond that, and they bid on something entirely different, they have not met the specifications, and it is not competitive bidding when they do. In this particular situation some of the specifications required the low bidder to bid certain things, and they bid something entirely different. Their feeling was that their piece of equipment does as good or better a job than the one we specified. He believes that we have a legal problem. You cannot accept a bid that does not meet specifications or come close to specifications, and make a waiver. Phil Stine appeared as Sales Manager for Naylor Supply Company. He stated that he took six exceptions. They ran tests for two days. Their machine did as good as the competitive machine. He stated that they can do the job which the machine was intended to be purchased for. Alderman Wilson asked about the machines. Joe Smith, Director of Public Utilities, stated that as far as the two machines, they could find no difference. Even though the Camel may have done as good or better than the other, City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that it seems Mr. Stine is telling us what we need, and that is not the way it works. We tell them what we need. There are different ways to write specifications -- design and performance. If we wrote the specifications for performance only, that would be one thing, but he does not believe we wrote the specifications that way. 341 Item 12a, cont'd. Wallace Coats appeared as Sales Manager for Environmental Sales and Service. He stated that there are over 100 of these Vactor machines in service in Texas municipalities. His competitor has none in Texas. He stated that their equipment is proven. Two engines are needed on this equipment bacause of the horsepower rating. He went over the specifications. He stated that there is a reason for the specifications, and he appreciates the City Attorney spelling them out. He stated that he has not taken exceptions on this bid. He has met and exceeded all specifications , and he deserves the business. It was noted that he did in fact take exception on the gross vehicle weight and rear axle. Alderman Morris asked City Attorney H. P. Hodge if he is saying that they would have legal problems if they accept either bid? The City Attorney stated that the rear axle is close enough to waive that exception. As a legal proposition, he would not say they could not accept that bid. He would say that on a legal proposition they could not accpet the Camel bid. He based his recommendation on rejecting the Camel because it does not meet specifications. On the Vactor, he has a problem that you have specifications that spec-out the Camel , and you do not have competitive bidding when you do that. The specifications did not give Camel a fair shot at the bids. It appears that you almost have to reject all bids. This is one, he feels , which goes beyond their discretion. This is set up for the benefit of the taxpayers. Wallace Coats stated that there are a number of cities in Texas which have written specifications just like they have. He noted that you have to write specifications. Mr. Coats asked Brent Proffitt if the Camel engine got hot? Mr. Proffitt stated that for a Ford engine, it was not hot. Mr. Coats also asked if it boiled the antifreeze out? (He had maintained earlier that it did. ) Mr. Proffitt stated that it did not. Mr. Coats maintained that he deserves the bid. Moved by Alderman Shearman that we reject all bids. Motion seconded by Alderman Wilson, and carried by the following vote. Ayes : Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Wilson, Morris, and Boston Nays: None (Alderman Russell was out of the room. ) Moved by Alderman Hampton that we rewrite the specifications, and re-advertise for bids. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman. Paul Varjeco, of Super Products in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, wondered who in the City is qualified enough to write a specification on how a vacuum cleaner is constructed? He does not feel there are enough capable people in the city to write the specifications needed. The motion was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Wilson, Morris , and Boston Nays: None (Alderman Russell was out of the room. ) - - - - - - - - - - Item 13a Ray Wilkins, partner in the firm of Ernst and Whinney Independent Auditors, presented the annual financial report for the fiscal year which ended on September 30, 1981. Mr. Wilkins stated that this may be quite a landmark because for several years the auditors ' opinions were qualified on the fixed assets of the water and sewer fund, and the general fixed assets of the City. Starting with the year 1980 the city started documentation to remove the qualification of these accounts. The qualification was lifted in 1981 on the general fixed assets. It is a clean opinion. It is something that adds to the City's financial appearance. An examination has been completed of the City's financial records. It does not necessarily disclose all the weaknesses in the system, but there is a somewhat clean opinion on this, too. There is also a clean opinion on grants. The reason they are here in May 1982 is that they have dated their report January 8, except that they were waiting for the outside appraisal people, and it was a good wait. Qualifications have been lifted, and clean opinions rendered. 342 Item 13a, cont'd. Mayor Cook stated that they appreciate the work done, and the opinion rendered. The Council and staff are commended for getting us to this point. Moved by Alderman Hampton that the annual financial report be accepted. Motion seconded by Alderman Morris, and carried unanimously. - - - - - - - - - - Item 13b Sam Francis, 1006 Austin, stated that he has been having trouble with the post office. The man who has the contract with the post office for carrying mail leaves his trucks parked in front of his house 24 hours a day. City Attorney H. P. Hodge stated that he knows of no reason that they cannot park there 24 hours a day. Mr. Francis also asked if the City owns the property at 1103, 1105, and 1107 Indiana? There seemed to be a problem with a sign possibly being posted on public right-of-way. Mayor Cook stated they will look into the matter, and ask the staff to get back with him. - - - - - - - - - - The Board of Aldermen adjourned at 12:00 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED this Ir7e/-'day of 1982. Mayor ATTEST: /A City Clerk 1�'OR ENGINEERING S-ERVICI-Is THIS AGREENiENT made this the '1Z day of 1982, royllafter called the oj��\T-R and by and between the Cit-y of J�ichita-Falls, Texas, lie NTER: Corlett7 Probst "' Boyd, Inc . , hereinafter called the ENGI' j*jERF-AS the 01\NER intends to construct Sewer System Improvements along U.S. Hwy- No. 277 between Fairway Boulevard and Allendale Road, and intends to construct another sewer line West from Fairway Boulevard along a drainage easement through University ParR: iRE THIS AGREDENT 1VIPTSSLn1: That for and in consideration of the NOW, THEREFC , it is hereby agreed that mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, the ENGINEER shall furnish engineering services to include the following: (1) He will conduct preliminary investigations, including general studies of the subsurface conditions and routing. (2) He will prepare preliminary plans and an estimate of the cost. (3) He will conduct the necessary 'design surveys, metes and bounds surveys for legal description of required rights-of-way, and prepare detailed plans, after approval of Preliminary Plans by the OWNER. (4) He will prepare contract documents which will include a construction contract, advertisement for bids, a general contract, notice of award, payment and performance bonds and specifications. (S) He will provide the necessary copies of the detailed plans and specifications and the construction contracts for the use of the OWNER, bidders and contractors. (6) He will assist the OWNER, when requested, in negotiating for property easements or rights-of-way required to construct the facility, and he will assist the OWNER's attorney in procuring titles, rights and authorizations. . (7) He will arrange for, attend and conduct the bid openings and tabulate the bid proposals with recommendations and summaries to the OMER. (8) He will interpret the intent of the plans and specifications to protect the OWNER against defects and deficiencies in construction on the part of the contractors. He will not, however, guarantee the performance by any contractor. (9) He will provide general engineering inspection of the work of the contractors as construction progresses. Detailed construction inspection and supervision will not be furnished. (10) He will prepare estimates for progress and final payments. (11) He 1�ill su, ,to ost�; to confirm compliancc with dei_�_iso adequ, L -Uld 5\'stoln Oporating rcquirements -Uld confol.T.,�anco with plans spccifications alicl ,,iako a fii.�al inspection of Lill construction 1 mid oquipment and issue cert ilic',It 101, Of final inspection to tho 0�1-11z. (12) He will provide the OWNER with (1) set of rcproducible "as built" plans and (2) sets of prints on paper at no cost to the OWNER. (13) He will notify appropriate persons of the date and time of final inspection. The OWNER agrees to pay the ENGIN-EER as compensation for hi s services rendered a nstruction contracts and the percentage arrived at fee based on the total of all co by using Curve A on the attachment taken from the Texas Society of Professional Enaineers General Engineering Services Publication. Percentages for compensation shall be based on construction costs, payable as follows: 1. 80% of the total compensation upon awarding of the construction contracts. 2. 200 upon completion of the construction contracts and acceptance by the OWNER. Total compensation for Engineer's services shall not exceed $40,260.00 IN WITNESS Id-EREOF, the parties hereby have affixed their hands this day of 1982. ATTEST: OWNER: The City of Wichita Falls, Texas B Y Wilina J. Thomas, City Clerk ATTEST: ENGINEER: Corlett, Probst Boyd, Inc. T,Z�a C�. a' By: a g 2,, _4 L.-� Richard K. Boyd, y A. E. Probst, i-F. , Vice-President. Curves of IMedia-il Compensation CURVES A AND B 0 0 4 m co LU c: :3 -- c 0 > .2 0- i5.tl ca b.0 c: CL :3 0 cr cf) ca = Ln c: 41; c co CL) L) LI) cp Ln E 0 0 0 0- Uj cu __j E CL En ui 0 (70 CO > Ln _C < > 0 (L) ::D LLJ 0 > L) 0 Ln Lj] a LL- .0 > L) < 0 CL U) 0 < C) V) U) cn LLI CL > < z w 7u- cu > Z a) -0 E E :;, 0 0 cn < 0 0 L- LO W :3 E -a E -0, 0 E E M =3 E W > w E o — r tn :3 0 w U in Ln 0 C) co CL 0 -0 CU c; E Ln 0 W M L..0 u m z U r- -0 — th 0 cu CL E Ln .— M C) 0 tn co cu Ln m w V) W in 0— c: 0 Z-�c r- r- *b—D 6 z " 0 0 .00 0 to m cu a (V V) > r U = 0 E c w 0 F- 0 -Z Ln 0 -0 n cu .0 r- w — c 0 0 > cu -0 (D r- — .!n 0 w - t M- P- cmn tn ��: m 6 E CJ 0 m CY co W) IN3083d-398VHO OISVEI w 0 Curve A is intended to apply to assignments of which the following are typical examples: Water, sewage and industrial waste treatment plants Low cost, Or complicated, waterfront and marine terminal facilities Complicated dams and hydro-power installations Small bridges and bridges which are complicated by involved geo- metrics and unsymmetrical features, or which require location andlor alternate design studies Grade crossing eliminations Urban streets and freeways, including related drainage facilities Water distribution lines under 16-inch diameter Sanitary sewage collect ion lines under 24-inch diameter pumping stations Air pressure tunnels Swimming pools Foundations Curve B is intended to apply to less complicated assignments of which the following are examples: Large intercepting and relief sewers Storm sewers and drains Sanitary sewage collection lines 24-inch diameter and over Water distribution lines 16-inch diameter and over ' Simple bridges and other structures of straightforward or conven- tional design Dams of average complexity Airport paving and grading Irrigaf ion works, except pumping plants Railways Levees and flood walls, conventional Sewer and water funnels (free air) Earthwork and dredging Highways and rural roads, except low-cost rural roads High-cost wharf facilities of conventional design Retaining walls and bulkheads, conventional P.D E R C--)'�l RACI Up V I ELL) Ll 00CUMEN7 01 OTHM 1'1'( )IECl: Bellevue Park (11ANGE ORDER NU%iBEP # 2 III-1-n c. '�d�i;('"s) TO (owner) ARCH I TECT'S PROJECT NO: B78-79-80-81 F— Cit of Wichita Falls CONTRACT FOR: MC48-0030 ParL & Recretion Dept. P. 0. Box 1431 Wichita Fallsp Texas 76307 CONTRACT DATE: 3-2-82 The following changes are Corner B - Labor and Material on changing grade and length of ramps and changing center ramp to 61 width. $lt560.00 211,905-00 740.o6 212,645.o6 Uc Con!T'!�i i—Tf- Jjje C0[l',rJCt 'SLIM % OM r (".xxxx; by this change Orde� . 19560.00 The ncw ( ontract Sum including tlij� Or,der v.,iil I I)(, . I. . . . . . . . 2149205.06 The Contract Time %%ill be ((�(.XXMX(unchanj:�,d) by Days. The Date of Complelion of tile dte of this ChaniT Ordle, therefore is C. D. Graham Constr.- Co. ...... k boro Hwy. OWNER AR( HITECT 6T a c s Addres Address Addrf,�� Wichita Falls , Texas BY BY-z- /a - j:_Z� - -- DATE DATE Aprj 1-209 1982 L] C U T K,'�CT 0 P �(l 0 RD ER F ILLP F1 AIA DOCUMNT G701 OTHIP, PPO)ECT: Bellevue Park CHANGE ORDFR NUMBER: # 1 iltvm�. addre,�) -10 (Owner) ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: B78-79-80-81 F-city of Wichita Falls MC48-0030 Parks & Recretion Dept. CONIRACT FOR: P. 0. Box 1431 L Wichita Fallsp Texas 76307 C()NIRACT DATE 3-2-82 The following changes are: Jack Peirce Electric (Copy enclosed) $616-72 Plus 20% Overhead & Profit 123-34 $740-06 T hc 211,905-00 2llv905-OO u!(i( r v,a� -The The Cont�act Sm-n \-A! by thi� Change Order . . . $ 740.06 Tile ne�\ Conlrlct Sum mcludin-, this Chative Order N.,ill k! . . . . . . . . . . . $ 212t645.06 The Con1rict Tirm, v,ill be rgN�NPN) Pay4NX-4)") (Unchanged) by Days. The Date of cornpIctiona, of the date of this Change Order therefore is C.D. Graham Constr. Co. ACT )R ARCHIJECI Ecksborc, Hwv. 2 --------- Address Address Address Wi_chita_._T!4q)��,-?__Texas Y--/ _: --- By B Y BY DATE ---DATE April 20, 1.982 DATE I A r,- JACK, PEIRCE EL E C T R I C PHONE (817) 322-1812 1901 TENTH STREET, ROOM 112 WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS 76301 April 9, 1982 C. D. Graham Construction Co. re: Believue Park 5202 jacksboro Hwy Wichita Falls, Texas 76302 Gentlemen: We propose to add 2 walk fixtures, 2 weatherproof receptacles and 120V circuit and stub out at pole *3 or circuit CR6 for the sum of $ 616. 72 1 Material Price 1hal;or Price 10 3/4" PVC 22. 27c 2. 23 6. 00 . 60 2 3/4" PVC Elbow W/Coup. 79. 00c 1. 58 30.00 . 60 3 3/4" PVC Adapter 33. 00c . 99 7.00 . 21 1060 ' $10 Copper Wire 69. 52m 73. 69 7. 60m. 8.06 2 W.P. Duplex Recpt. W/cover 7. 50@ 15. 00 1. 20@ 2.40 2 Walk Lights 56. 00@ 112. 00 J.'50@ 3.00 205. 49 14. 86 Material 205. 49 Labor 14, 86.@ 13. 10 194. 67 Labor 3. 72@ 14. 15 52. 64 Labor Fringes 56. 88 509. 68 Plus 10% Overhead 50. 97 Plus 10% Profit 56. 07 Total $616. 72 Thank you ,, Jack Peirce JP/ap (7 0 N -,T P I I (-T I to I �I rT A I I AT I ("N P0