Loading...
Min 04/20/1982 316 Wichita Falls, Texas Memorial Auditorium Building April 20, 1982 Items 1 & 2 The Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, met in regular session on the above date in the Council Room of the Memorial Auditorium Building at 8:30 o'clock A.M. , with the following members present. Gary D. Cook Mayor Gene Shearman John W. Hampton Carol G. Russell Aldermen Craig A. Wilson Howard M. Morris Horace 0. Boston Stuart Bach City Manager H. P. Hodge, Jr. City Attorney Wilma J. Thomas City Clerk Fred Werner Chief Accounting Officer The invocation was given by Ben Read, Beverly Drive United Methodist Church. Item 3 Item 16b of the minutes of the meeting held April 6, 1982, were corrected to reflect Alderman Morris voting "Nay" . It was also pointed out by Mayor Cook that in Item 9j of the minutes of April 6, the Council voted to award the bid for quicklime to Texas Lime Company, Cleburne, in the amount of $207,559.56, although a motion was apparently not made. Moved by Alderman Hampton that the bid for quicklime be awarded to Texas Lime Company in the amount of $207,559.56. Motion seconded by Alderman Wilson, and carried unanimously. Moved by Alderman Shearman that minutes of the meeting held April 6, 1982, be approved, with the correction of Item 16b. Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried unanimously. Moved by Alderman Boston that minutes of the meeting held April 13, 1982, be approved. Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried unanimously. Items 4a - 5d Moved by Alderman Shearman that the consent agenda be approved. Motion seconded by Alderman Morris. Item 4a RESOLUTION NO. 69-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE 1980 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT ON BROOK STREET AND GARFIELD STREET. WHEREAS, Opex, Inc. , the contractor, has completed work on the 1980 water line replacement on Brook Street and Garfield Street in accordance with the plans and specifications; and, 317 Item 4a, cont'd. WHEREAS, the contract for such work was based on unit prices for estimated quantities; on this basis, the revised quantities estimated that the total cost of the contract would be $114,502.00; and, WHEREAS, the actual quantities used in the project was more than the quantities which was revised, therefore, the total amount of the contract based on the unit prices applied to actual quantities is $114,602.50. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Such project is hereby accepted by the City of Wichita Falls. The total amount due such contractor on the 1980 Water Line Replacement project is $15,213.25 and the City Manager is authorized to make final payment to Opex, Inc. based on this amount. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None Item 5a-d Minutes of the meeting of the Plumbing Advisory Board held March 31, 1982, were received. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None Minutes of the meeting of the Motor Vehicle Salvage and/or Junk Yard Commission held March 31, 1982 were received. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None Minutes of the meeting of the Arts Commission held April 7, 1982, were received. Ayes : Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None Minutes of the meeting of the Board of Electrical Examiners held April 8, 1982, were received. Ayes: Mayor Cook. Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None Item 6a Mr. Richard Toby appeared as owner of Fire Appliance Company. He stated that the new fire truck recently purchased by the City will not meet the specifications required by the bid if it is like it was bid. He stated, though, that he would be satisfied if the new council inspects it when it comes in. Mr. Toby stated that he feels Wichita Falls is on the move, and growing, and - he is pleased that the new council is working! Item 6b Mrs. Steve Bull was not present to address the animal control ordinance. 318 Item 7a A proposed ordinance was presented imposing a gross receipts tax on the conduct of bingo games within the City of Wichita Falls. ORDINANCE NO. 49-82 ORDINANCE IMPOSING A TWO PER CENT GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ON THE CONDUCT OF BINGO GAMES WITHIN THE CITY. Moved by Alderman Hampton that Ordinance No. 49-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Boston. Alderman Morris asked how much money this will generate, or will it cost more to collect it since the first $2500 is exempt? The City Manager stated that our only responsibility would be to provide whatever law enforcement might be needed. The City does not collect it. It is collected by the State Comptroller. Copies of each application must be provided to the City. The City Manager knew of only one application, but City Clerk Wilma Thomas noted that she had received three applications. Mr. Bach explained that virtually all authority rests with the comptroller's office. Alderman Shearman asked if the City of Wichita Falls could tax this first $2500? The City Manager stated that the state statute will not permit it. The motion was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None Item 8a A proposed resolution was presented authorizing the City Manager to execute a cooperative services agreement with the Wichita Falls Independent School District. This agreement provides up to 20 million gallons of raw water annually to the school district's farm in exchange for the school district allowing the City free use of the Reagan Junior High School gymnasiums for all city employees. RESOLUTION NO. 70-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A COOPERATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE WI.CHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: That certain agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, between the City of Wichita Falls and Wichita Falls Independent School District, concerning the City's use of certain gymnasium facilities, is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute such agreement for the City of Wichita Falls . Moved by Alderman Morris that Resolution No. 70-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Russell . Alderman Shearman asked how many times the city police and fire departments use this gym? The City Manager stated that the Fire Department has not used it at all . The Police has used it from five to ten times a month for various purposes. We are trying to expand it so that all city employees can use it. Alderman Shearman stated that it seems it might be a high price to pay for it. The City Manager stated that we do not pay any utilities or janitorial services, and he does not know that the school has used the maximum of water authorized. The motion was carried by the following vote. 319 Ttom 321 Item 8c, cont'd. Alderman Wilson felt that we should plug in a reasonable cost for fencing. Alderman Morris asked if there are any homes around this site? Mr. McDaniel stated that there are some about one-half mile from the site. The motion for passage of Resolution No. 72-82 was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays: None Item 9a Bids were considered on an oil and gas lease at Lake Kickapoo. Moved by Alderman Shearman that the bid be awarded as follows: To Burns Leasing Corporation for 98.5 acres of Tract 4 at $35.00 per acre, totaling $3,447.50, plus a delay rental of $1.00 per acre for four years in the amount of $394.00, for a total amount of $3,841.50; and, To L and H Oil Company for 76.5 acres of Tracts 2 and 3 at $50.00 per acre, totaling $3,812.50, plus $2.00 per acre annual delay rental in the amount of $814.40, for a total amount of $4,626.90. This would assure the City of Wichita Falls $8,468.40 total yield, or a better deal of $1,653.50. Motion seconded by Alderman Wilson. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that he does not believe we can do what Alderman Shearman is suggesting because we advertised for proposals for all or a part of the total acreage put up for bids. There is no way we can accept part of a proposal . On construction projects the bidder advertises to do a complete job, and not a part of it. He does not see there is any way we can award a partial bid in this case. Alderman Shearman noted that in the first paragraph it states that the City of Wichita Falls will accept a bid on all or any part of it. Mr. Hodge and,explained but as that we left the option that the bidder could bid on any part construes it, that was up to the bidder, and not to the Council . Mayor Cook explained the bids as he understands it. Mr. Hodge agreed. Alderman Hampton stated that we have two choices -- to accept the bids as submitted, or reject both bids and advertise again under a different method of advertising. Mayor Cook asked if the 164 acres were under water which were not bid on? Alderman Hampton noted that it seems that way. Alderman Wilson felt we should defeat this motion, and put this land out for bids by tract. Jim Horany appeared representing the partner and owner of L and H Oil Company. He stated that in his opinion, the motion made by Alderman Shearman is correct. Burns bid only on a part of Tract 4. He found out later that the 98 acres were not under water. He did not know the prohib�t ther he w�ity from awardinguld have bid on ttwoHbids stated that he knows of no law which would in accordance with the way it was advertised. If Burns does not want it that way, he will be glad to take it up. Alderman Wilson .asked Mr. Horany if he represented Burns would he feel they could require specific performance completing the havecontract optionetocrePect portion of stated the of his bid by tract? Mr. Horany Y would ject i .The City would be better off toaatrdt with preThe�etwouldhat fbehmoreey eexpenseit, he would be glad to take it over $4000 an acre in advertising for bids again if they reject both bids. 322 Item 9a, cont'd. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that we could not accept Horany's offer on the 98 acres because they did not bid it. Mayor Cook asked Mr. Hodge, as legal advisor to this Council , can we accept Alderman Sherman's motion? Mr. Hodge stated that it can be accepted, but we cannot enforce it. The motion failed by the following vote. Ayes : Alderman Shearman Nays: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Moved by Alderman Wilson that oil and gas lease bids be rejected, and that this property be re-advertised by tracts, and bids be accepted by tracts. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman. Moved by Alderman Hampton that an amendment to the motion provide for a minimum bid of 3/16 royalty on all tracts. Motion seconded by Alderman Morris. The amended motion was carried unanimously. The original motion also carried unanimously. Item l0a Permission was requested to advertise for bids for refurbishing the Jalonick Park Community Center. Moved by Alderman Shearman that authority be granted to advertise for bids, as requested. Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried unanimously. Item 10b A proposed resolution was presented authorizing publication of a notice of intent to lease for oil and gas certain lands at Lake Kickapoo. RESOLUTION NO. 73-82 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO LEASE FOR OIL AND GAS CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED AT LAKE KICKAP00 IN ARCHER COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls has received a request that certain lands owned by the City at Lake Kickapoo in Archer County, Texas , be leased for oil and gas exploration and production. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. It is advisable, under proper circumstances, to lease for the development of oil and gas that certain 80 acre tract of land located at Lake Kickapoo, Archer County, Texas, as described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Any such oil and gas lease shall provide for at least 3/16 royalty, and shall have a primary term of no more than five (5) years. SECTION 3. Any such oil and gale lease may include a pooling provision which meets with the requirements of Subchapter B of Chapter 71 of the Natural Resources Code of the State of Texas. 323 Item 10b, cont'd. SECTION 4. Under any such oil and gas lease, no actual drilling may occur on the property covered by such lease unless the location of such well is approved in advance by the City, and meets the specifications designated for protecting the water in the lake; provided, however, such provision would not prohibit the drilling of the well on other lands with which a portion of the leased property was pooled nor the drilling of a directional well under such property. SECTION 5. City shall give notice of intention to lease such lands by publication once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper published in the County, which notice shall describe the land and designate the time and place at which the Board of Aldermen will receive and consider bids for such lease. SECTION 6. City will not warrant the title to minerals in such land. SECTION 7. The Board of Aldermen reserves the right to reject any and all bids , and to give notice and call for additional bids, if same is determined to be in the best interest of the City. Moved by Alderman Hampton that Resolution No. 73-82 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that on this 80-acre tract they would take bids on the whole tract for all or nothing. The minimum royalty would be 3/16, for a five-year term, with development to be from the surface to a depth of 2000 feet. The motion was carried by the following vote. Ayes : Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Hampton, Russell , Wilson, Morris and Boston Nays : None Item lla The meeting of the Board of Aldermen was recessed to consider a report of the Committee of the Whole to the Board of Aldermen concerning the police pay step initiative petition. City Manager Stuart Bach recommended that an educational and certification incentive, and a modified compressed longevity pay plan be received. Mayor Cook stated that the Committee of the Whole felt in the work session last Friday that a compressed modified longevity pay plan, with a cut-off at 16 years, should be considered, coupled with education/certification incentives in the plan. Moved by Alderman Hampton that the report of the Committee of the Whole be presented to the Board of Aldermen. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. The Committee of the Whole was dissolved, and the meeting of the Board of Aldermen was resumed. Moved by Alderman Shearman that the report of the Committee of the Whole be received. Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried unanimously. Mayor Cook stated that we now have 30 days to take final action on the recommenda- tion of the Committee of the Whole. Item llb The City Manager stated that in preparing the Ringgold report the Council has received, they were faced with several constraints . The February report stated that the project would not be needed until 2010 unless our population changes. There is 324 Item llb, cont'd. a great deal of competition for water resources, and water development. There is some concern that other cities might also be considering this same location. Once you receive a permit, you should proceed with construction within two years from the time the permit was received. This protects this yield for your jurisdiction. The last aspect of the report was the dollar amount considered. Construction of the lake is estimated to be almost 65 million dollars. It would mean a very sizable bond issue and water rate increase in Wichita Falls. He recommended a phased approach. The pace could be accelerated. The four phases included (1) hydrologic analysis, which means that 17,000 acres of land would have to be purchased. This would be in partnership with TESCO. They would determine how far above the 845 elevation we should go for the 200-300 year flood. Determination would also be made as to whether an additional 14,000 acres would be needed. The cost for this phase would be $25,000, and it would take 90-120 days to complete it. The second phase would be a recommendation that we apply for a permit from the Texas Water Commission and Texas Water Resources. They indicated that we should go ahead and apply. They have extended some of these permits from six years to a total of sixteen years. It would cost $50,000 for a permit application. Engineering expertise is primarily needed for this application. We would seek permit extensions. The third phase would be surveying and mapping property which we may be purchasing. A storage basin of 17,000 acres would be needed. Estimated costs are $136,000 to $248,000, plus right-of-entry fees. We would need to negotiate longer term agreements with Texas Electric. The fourth phase would be actual purchase of property for the reservoir site. The parcels we would want to acquire first depends on how much money we have to spend, whether we pay surface or sub-surface rights , and whether we allow people to live on the property for several years, etc. Alderman Hampton asked for an explanation of the West Texas Utility Fund. Joe Smith, Director of Public Utilities, stated that it is for a generating plant for the West Texas Utilities. The City of Wichita Falls and the Water District are co-owners of Lakes Kemp and Diversion. In order for them to have water, West Texas Utilities came up with holding water. They pay an annual amount for holding this water, and they put it in a trust fund. They pay $300,000 per year, split 50-50 until the year 1987. They will then pay $500,000 annually for five years unless West Texas Utilities has their plant built. It is 24 cents per thousand gallons water for what they use. We have a contract to supply them 20,000 acre feet per year. This money has been put in a trust fund to be used for development of future water projects. We have used $100,000 out of this fund for repairs to Lake Kickapoo. Mayor Cook asked how much money we have in this fund right now? The City Manager stated that we have $100,000. Alderman Wilson asked if we could have some idea of the extent of participation with Texas Electirc? The City Manager stated that it would be 50-50 on the hydrological analysis. Jack Redding, Manager of Texas Electric, stated that they anticipate they will remain partners with the City up to 50 percent. They want to look to the future. If the City moves ahead too much, they would want to review it. At this time they do not foresee building a power plant on this lake. It is not even in their plans. They would work with the City on longer range terms. Alderman Hampton asked if we drop below the Noah flood, are we getting into trouble with any of the state agencies? Dick Manahan, Assistant Director of Public Utilities, stated that they need to know at what elevation they want them to acquire land. Joe Smith stated we would not be in trouble with the Corps of Engineers. The Corps is not holding us to the PMF. The Corps is concerned with safety of the dam. Mr. Manahan stated that the 845 contour is at Henrietta. The 865 contour is about halfway between Henrietta and Lake Arrowhead. Before it is mapped, we have to decide what easements are needed. Mayor Cook noted that steps 1 and 2 would take seven months. We have the money to take care of Step 1. 325 Item llb, cont'd. Moved by Alderman Hampton that we approve Step 1 (hydrologic analysis) , and that the money the City will spend will come from the West Texas Utility Fund. Motion seconded by Alderman Wilson, and carried unanimously. Alderman Shearman requested that the Council be presented these documents earlier next time. He received them at 9:00 o'clock P.M. last night. The City Manager apologized for the short notice. Item llc David Brock requested that he be placed on the Human Relations Commission at the first opening. He also suggested that inactive members on all boards and commissions be replaced. :,.,.. Mayor Cook noted that they are in the process of drawing up new procedures for appointing board and commission members. The City Manager will have it prepared for the Council in the near future. They will be looking at the inactive members. Items lld, e The Board of Aldermen recessed at 10:15 A.M. for an executive session on Article 6252-17, Subsection (g) , of the Revised Texas Civil Statutes (Personnel ) . The Board of Aldermen resumed at 12:15 P.M. Moved by Alderman Hampton that Horace Boston be appointed Mayor Pro tem. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. Moved by Alderman Hampton that Council members be appointed as liaison to boards and commissions, as follows. a. Nortex Executive Committee - Gary Cook and Carol Russell . b. Wichita General Hospital Board - Carol Russell . c. Commission on Status of Women - Gene Shearman. d. Aviation Advisory Board - John Hampton. e. Parks Board - Craig Wilson. f. Traffic Commission - Dr. Horace Boston. g. Planning Board - John Hampton. h. Arts Commission - John Hampton. i . MHMR Board - Dr. Horace Boston. j . Design Review Commission - Carol Russell . k. Charter Commission - Gene Shearman. 1 . Nortex General Member - Gene Shearman, Howard Morris, and Dr. Horace Boston. m. Policy Board Urban Transportation - Craig Wilson. n. Ad Hoc Transportation Committee - Craig Wilson and Howard Morris. o. Human Relations Commission - Carol Russell . p. Board of Electrical Examiners - Gene Shearman. q. Traffic Safety Council - Gene Shearman. r. Centennial Commission - Howard Morris. s. Clean Community Commission - John Hampton. t. Motor Vehicle Salvage/Junk Yard Commission - Gene Shearman. Motion seconded by Alderman Wilson, and carried unanimously. Item llf Moved by Alderman Shearman that appointments to various boards and commissions be tabled. Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried unanimously. 326 The Board of Aldermen adjourned at 12:18 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED this !1V-y day of _ '111) IZI, 1982. Mayor ATTEST: I C ty Clerk ADMINISTRATION - CITY OF WICHITA FALLS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Stuart A. Bach, City Manager DATE: April 20, 1982 FROM: Edward A. Barrett, Director of Administrative Services SUBJECT: Further Information, Police Salary Initiative. At the working session of the Board's Committee of the Whole held on April 16, 1982, the Board requested that additional information be presented regarding education and certification pay and the modified longevity system. This information is provided below. Education and Certification Pay. On April 16, the petitioners presented a revised certification pay schedule calling for $80 per month for an Intermediate Certificate and $125 per month for an advanced certificate. Prior to this time, discussion has centered on proposals calling for $40/$80 or $50/$100. Petitioners also indicated that they preferred eliminating the current education program and substituting a certificate only program. At the present time, 37 officers hold intermediate certificates ana 35 (excluding the Chief of Police) hold advanced certificates . Eleven (11 ) other officers who hold Basic certificates are currently receiving payments under the educational incentive program. These 11 officers are receiving $8,083 per year. Elimination of the educational incentive program would have a negative effect on these officers since they are not currently holding either intermediate or advanced certificates. In addition, five (5) officers with intermediate certificates are now receiving $80 per month under the education incentive program and one officer is receiving $70 per month. Unless the rates were set at $80 per month for an intermediate certificate, these officers would also suffer a monthly pay reduction. Because of these considerations , the costs presented below are based on a combined education and certification program. In light of the new proposal presented by the petitioners , an additional option ($60/$120) is also presented. Table 1 presents the cost of the education/certification options for FY82-83. Table 2 presents the total four year costs of these programs (FY81-82 through 84-85) . Further Information, Police Salary Initiative. Page 2 TABLE 1 Education and Certification Options FY 82-83 40/80 50/100 60/120 80/125 Education and Certification $74,441 91 ,555 103,758 115,453 Less Current Education 35,477 35,477 35,477 35,477 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST $38,964 56,078 68,281 79,976 Estimated Savings, Education Pay Eliminated 12,262 11 ,361 10,489 8,891 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST, CERTIFICATION ONLY $26,702 $44,717 $57,792 $71 ,085 TABLE 2 Education and Certification Options Four Year Costs 40/80 50/100 60/120 80/125 Education and Certification 314,074 386,278 437,766 487,109 Less Current Education 149,681 149,681 149,681 149,681 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST 164,393 236 ,597 288,085 337,428 Estimated Savings , Education 254 37,512 Pay Eliminated* 51 ,734 47,933 44, TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST, CERTIFICATION ONLY 112,659 188,664 243,831 299,916 *Four year estimates for savings through the elimination of education p-ay are based on current information. Actual four year savings are likely to be substantially lower as officers move upward into intermediate and advanced certificates. It would be reasonably assumed that all or almost all officers currently in the education program will have moved into the certification program during the next three fiscal years . Modified Longevity. Per the Board's request, a revised modified longevity plan has been analyzed. This plan compresses the longevity increases in order to provide Further Information, Police Salary Initiative. Page 3 a greater salary increase earlier in a commissioned officer's career. Due to this compression, two options have been prepared as follows : OPTION ONE OPTION TWO Years of Service Longevity Years of Service Longevity 1-4 $ 6 1-4 $ 6 5-8 $ 9 5-8 $ 9 9-12 $12 9-12 $12 13-25 $15 13-16 $15 17+ Maximum of $240/month As can be seen, the second option is substantially the same as the first option except that it sets a maximum limit on the total dollar amount to be paid in longevity. Under the first option, the maximum payment at 25 years of service would be $375 (25x$15) . Under the second, the maximum payment would be reached at 16 years of service and would be $240 per month (16x$15) . Table 3 below presents cost figures on both of these options for FY 82-83. Table 4 presents four year costs. TABLE 3 Modified Longevity Costs FY 82-83 OPTION ONE OPTION TWO Total Longevity (Inc. Fringe) $223,119 $175,111 Less Current Longevity (Inc. Fringe) 69,241 69,241 TOTAL ADDITIONAL $153,878 $105,870 TABLE 4 Modified Longevity Four Year• Costs OPTION ONE OPTION TWO Total Longevity (Inc. Fringe) $932,948 $730,878 Less Current Longevity (Inc. Fringe) 290,017 290,017 TOTAL ADDITIONAL $642,931 $440,861 Further Information, Police Salary Initiative. Page 4 In order to show the total potential dollar impact of these longevity options when combined with an education and certification program, the following table has been prepared. TABLE 5 Total Costs, Modified and Compressed Longevity and Education and Certification Pay OPTION ONE -- NO LIMIT FY 82-83 FOUR YEAR with 40/80 plan $192,842 $807,324 with 50/100 plan 209,956 879,528 with 60/120 plan 222,159 931 ,016 with 80/125 plan 233,854 980,359 OPTION TWO -- $240 MAXIMUM with 40/80 plan 144,834 605,254 with 50/100 plan 161 ,948 677,458 with 60/120 plan 174,151 728,946 with 80/125 plan 185,846 778,289 Finally, in order to assess the effect of various proposals on individual officers, Table 6 has been prepared to compare selected options . Due to the large number of options reviewed to date, not all have been covered. Further Information, Police Salary Initiative. Page 5 TABLE 7 Comparison of Various Options Five Year Officer Increments Two Step Two Step Longevity Longevity Years Current 125/300) 100/250) No Limit Limit Base 19,234 19,234 19,234 19,234 19,234 5 yrs.1 19,474 20,974 20,674 19,774 19,774 w. E+C2 20,434 22,174 21 ,874 20,974 20,974 10 yrs 1 19,714 23,314 22,714 20,674 20,674 w. E+C2 20,674 24,514 23,914 21 ,874 21 ,874 15 yrs 1 19,954 23,554 22,954 21 ,934 21 ,934 w. E+C2 20,914 24,754 24,154 23,134 23,134 20 yrs 1 20,194 23,794 23,194 22,834 22,114 w. E+C� 21 ,154 24,994 24,394 24,034 23,314 Potential 10 yr. Increase 7.5% 27.5% 24.3% 13.70/0 13.7% Potential Total Increase 10.0°0 29.9% 26.8% 25.0% 21 .2% 1Where appropriate, salary shown includes current longevity at 14.00 per month per year of service. 2For CURRENT, education pay used is $80 per month. For all other options , education and certificate pay is $100 per month. As can be seen, all options other than the current salary system would allow officers to increase their salaries from 21 to 30 percent over 20 years and from 14 to 28%.over ten years. It should be noted, however, that such increases are not guaranteed since a substantial portion of the increase is dependent upon officer initiative in either pursuing further education or certification. However, with the addition of certification pay, a monetary reward would be made available to substantially more officers than are currently eligible for education pay. Should you have any questions or should you desire any further information, please contact me. Edward A. Barrett Director of Administrative Services AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Wichita Falls Independent School District (hereinafter called "District") owns and operates a school farm located to the west of Lake Road and to the north of the Lake Wichita dam; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls (hereinafter called "City") has a raw water transmission line traversing the aforementioned District property; and, WHEREAS, the District owns two gymnasium facilities located at the former Reagan Junior High School; and, WHEREAS, the District and the City had under contract dated February 13, 1978, exchanged District gymnasium usage by City Police and Fire Department personnel for District usage of City raw water for irrigation of the District's school farm; and, WHEREAS, the City now wishes to expand usage of District' s gymnasiums to all City departments and personnel for fitness and recreational purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree to the following: 1. That the contract dated February 13, 1978, for the cooperative ex- change of services between the District and the City is herewith superseded by this agreement. 2. That the City will: a. Continue to allow the District to tap the City' s raw water pipe- line at the District's expense, with usage of such water to be measured by a meter installed at the District's expense. b. Allow the District to consume up to 20 million gallons annually of raw water at no cost for school farm irrigation purposes. C. Charge the District for all raw water consumed or used by the District over and above the first 20 million gallons annually at the City's then prevailing raw water rate per 1,000 gallons. The measurement of "annual consumption" shall be for the period beginning October 1 and ending September 30 of each year. d. Retain authority to reduce or restrict the District's raw water usage in times of emergencies as determined by the City. 3. That the District will: a. Allow the City free use of the District' s Reagan .Junior High School gymnasiums and related facilities during reasonable hours for physical fitness and recreational programs for City employees. b. Work with City' s Parks and Recreation Department in establishing mutually agreeable times for City usage of the aforementioned gymnasiums. Final scheduling decisions , however, will rest with the District. 4. That the agreement may be terminated by either party upon ninety (90) days advance written notice to the other party. In such event, if the District wishes to continue to use City raw water, it shall be charged for same at the prevailing rate per 1,000 gallons, and, if the City wishes to continue to use the District's gymnasiums, an agreed upon fee shall be established for such use. This Agreement is entered into this day of 1982, by and between the Wichita Falls independent School District and the City of Wichita Falls. WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT President ATTEST: CITY OF WICHITA FALLS Itj Manager ATTEST: J i City Clerk (2) l J 1 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ORDER NO. 3 DATE: 4/6/82 CONTRACT FOR: Holliday Creek Clearing & Cleaning Project OWNER: City of Wichita Falls TO: Zack Burkett Company Graham, Texas You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications . DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE AMOUNT 1. Change in contract value due to changes in quantities of bid items . (Increase) $7 , 342 . 50 Old Contract Price $70 , 000 . 00 New Contract Price $77 , 342 . 50 JUSTIFICATION: Increase in quantities to extend the amount of work projected at hourly rental rates . This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested• (Owner) Date) Accepted• (Contractor) (Date) Page of pages Agenda Item No. A G R E E M E N T WHEREAS , the City of Wichita Falls has been operating a landfill on the west side of Lake Arrowhead for several years at no charge to users of that facility; and WHEREAS , the City of Wichita Falls can no longer continue to operate and maintain said landfill in compliance with Texas State Health Department requirements and standards without imposing a user charge; and WHEREAS, many of the residents surrounding Lake Arrowhead wish to have a landfill conveniently available for their use and are willing to cooperate in and pay for such landfill service and facilities. NOW, THEREFORE , it is mutually agreed by and between the City of Wichita Falls (hereinafter called "City") and the Lake Arrowhead Volunteer Fire Department (hereinafter called "Department" ) that: 1. The City will continue to operate and provide a sanitary landfill and landfill services on the west side of Lake Arrowhead at the site described in the attached exhibit , so long as it is able to do so in compliance with Texas State Health Department and other applicable rules, regulations , standards and requirements. 2 . The City, through its City Manager, shall establish such annual and other landfill user fees and charges as will fairly and reasonably compensate the City for the services it renders in the operation and maintenance of the aforementioned landfill. 3 . The City shall annually bill such residential landfill users as desire to utilize the landfill for a continuous period of time. Upon payment of such bills in advance of the City' s established fiscal year, a card or other identifying document will be issued to the residential landfill user and such card or other identifying document shall serve as evidence of payment and will permit the holder to dump residential solid wastes without additional charge so long as the identification card remains valid. All non- card holders shall pay such fees and charges as are provided for under paragraph 2 . above. 4 . The Department shall provide at least one person to staff the landfill gate or entranceway to inspect the cards or other identifying documents of prepaid residential landfill users and to charge and collect fees , as predetermined by the City, from any and all landfill users who do not possess a valid user card or other identifying document. 5. The Department shall provide one or more persons, as necessary, for the purposes specified in paragraph 4 . above for the hours that the landfill is open. 6. Landfill operating hours shall be mutually agreed upon by the City and the Department. 7 . For any parties who wish to dispose of garbage, trash and other acceptable solid waste products at the landfill site described in the attachment hereto and who do not possess a valid and current user card, the Department shall charge and be respon- sible for collecting such fees and charges as are prescribed by the City. The Department shall record all funds so collected on forms and in a manner provided by the City and shall remit same to the City' s Finance Department at least once each week. The City reserves the right to inspect any and all records maintained by the Department under this agreement. 8 . The Department shall clean up, remove and properly dispose of any trash, litter, debris and other solid wastes dumped, wind blown, or otherwise deposited outside or in proximity to the landfill area and on or adjacent to the roadway leading to the landfill site. 9. In fulfilling its duties and responsibilities under this agreement, the Department shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws, rules , permits and regulations, and agrees to cooperate fully with the City to promote the efficient and proper operation and use of the landfill. Furthermore, the Department shall be solely responsible for the conduct of its operators, agents, employees or representatives and agrees to indemnify, defend, hold and save the City, its authorized agents, officers, representatives and employees, harmless from each and every claim and demand of I i whatever nature, and against any and all penalties, liability and annoyance or loss, resulting from claims or court action of any nature claimed to have arisen directly or indirectly out of acts of the Department or its agents, servants , guests, employees or representatives under this agreement or by any act, omission or conduct of such person. I ! 10. Either party to this agreement may terminate it upon sixty days ' advance written notice to the other party. i 11. This agreement shall be for an initial period of two years, commencing 1982 , and ending 1984 . If the Department fulfills its obligations hereunder for that two-year period, then the Depart- ment, with the consent of the City, shall have the option to extend the agreement for an additional two years; thereafter, the Depart- ment shall have a series of three options to renew this agreement for additional two-year terms. Each option shall be conditioned upon the Department ' s having fulfilled its obligations hereunder, and the Department may exercise such options by giving the City, through its City Manager, notice thereof in writing not less than sixty days prior to the end of the preceding term. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed on this the day of , 1982 . CITY OF WICHITA FALLS Bye C Mana er ATTEST: City Clerk LAKE ARROWHEAD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT By: ATTEST : I 1 Secretary _ z _ 'C . n o - T ce Lil i) LU -1 w � LIJo � � r cc`, '� �— Q� 0 goo a o co ° o 0- o 50o �� } &C � G � EXHIBIT A The oil and gas from the surface to a depth of 2 , 000 feet in that certain tract of land located in Archer County, Texas, to-wit: Beginning at a point in the East line of the Dallas County School Land, Ab. 113 and the West line of S. P. RR. No. 1 Ab. 440, that is 1680 feet South of the NE corner of said Dallas County School Land thence South 66 degrees West 1592 feet to a point, thence South 46 degrees 15 minutes West 1048 feet for a point, being the NW corner of this lease , thence South parallel with the East line of the Dallas County School Land 1.320 feet for a point being the SW corner of this lease, thence East NE parallel with the North line of this tract 2640 feet to a point in the East line of the Dallas County School Land that is 3 , 000 feet South of the NE corner of the school land for the SE corner of this lease, thence North along the East line of the Dallas County School Land 1320 feet to the place of beginning containing 80 acres more or less.