Loading...
Min 09/15/1981 118 Wichita Falls, Texas Memorial Auditorium Building September 15, 1981 Items 1 & 2 The Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls , Texas, met in regular session on the above date in the Council Room of the Memorial Auditorium Building at 8:30 o'clock A.M. , with the following members present. Kenneth Hill Mayor Gene Shearman i Curtis W. Smith Aldermen James B. Thomas Horace 0. Boston Stuart Bach City Manager H. P. Hodge, Jr. City Attorney Wilma J. Thomas City Clerk Fred Werner Director of Finance John W. Hampton Absent Carol Russell Absent The invocation was given by J. R. Ensey, Life Tabernacle. Item 3 Moved by Alderman Thomas that minutes of the meetings held September 1 and September 8, 1981 , be approved. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. Mayor Hill announced that Alderman Hampton was out of the City, and that Alderman Russell is ill , and has been in the hospital for the past two weeks. Our prayers for her are for a quick recovery. Items 4-7a Items 4b, 5b, and 6a were moved to the regular agenda. Moved by Alderman Thomas that the remainder of the consent agenda be approved. Motion seconded by Alderman Boston. Item 4a RESOLUTION NO. 2844 RESOLUTION APPROVING PAYMENT AND ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM STREET LIGHTING. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls and Lloyd Thomas Co. , Inc. , as contractor, entered into a contract dated July 7 , 1981 , wherein said contractor agreed to remove certain existing fixtures and to install certain new fixtures; and, WHEREAS, said contractor has completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, the removal of seventy-four (74) old fixtures, and the installa- tion of one hundred six (106) new fixtures ; and, WHEREAS, the final statement has been submitted for this project, and this final statement shows a total amount of work done as $5,293.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: 119 Item 4a, cont'd. The removal of old fixtures and installation of new high pressure sodium lighting fixtures is completed, and is accepted by the City of Wichita Falls , and the City Manager is authorized to pay to the contractor the amount due as shown on the final statement. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays: None Item 4c RESOLUTION NO. 2845 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT FOR AN ALLEY FROM TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY. THAT:BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, That certain right-of-way easement, a copy of which is attached hereto, for an alleyfrom Texas Electric Service Company is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute the same for acceptance by the City. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays : None Item 4d RESOLUTION NO. 2846 RESOLUTION DECLARING NECESSITY FOR ACQUIRING, APPROVING APPRAISALS AND AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ON CITY VIEW DRIVE, 1980-82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. WHEREAS, it is necessary to acquire the properties hereinafter described for the street right-of-way on City View Drive, 1980-82 Capital Improvement Program; and, WHEREAS, such properties have been appraised by an independent appraiser em- ployed by the City for this purpose, and the amount of the appraisals have been studied by the Board of Aldermen, and copies of same are now in possession of the Director of Public Works. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Section No. 1 . It is necessary to acquire the fee simple title to the following properties in Wichita Falls, Texas: CITY VIEW DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT 1980-82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Parcel No. 1 A strip of land being the east 20 feet of a parcel out of Block 14, Priddy Subdivi- sion of the G. W. Scott Survey, A-254, and is described in Vol . 1294, Page 847, and 970, page 250 in the deed records of Wichita County, Texas, said 20 foot wide strip is described by metes and bounds, as follows : Beginning at the Southeast property corner of Block 14, a point in the present West right-of-way line of City View Drive; THENCE N 800 00' W. 20.4 feet; THENCE N 000 19' W. 204.1 feet; THENCE S 720 35' E. 21 .0 feet along the southern boundary line of the north side of the canal ; THENCE S 000 19' E. 204.1 feet along the existing west right-of-way of City View Drive to the place of beginning, and containing 4082 square feet (0.09 ac) more or less. 120 Item 4d, cont'd. Parcel No. 3 A strip of land being the East 20 feet of a parcel out of Block 12, Priddy Subdivision of the G. W. Scott Survey A-254, and is described in Vol . 978, Page 302, in the Deed records of Wichita County, Texas; said 20 foot wide strip is described by metes and bounds, as follows : Beginning at a point in the East property line of Block 12, said point being the Southeast corner of said block, and also being the Northeast corner of Block 1 , Priddy Subdivision; THENCE N 80000' W. 20.4 feet; THENCE N 00019' W. 100.0 feet; THENCE S 80000' E. 20.4 feet; THENCE S 000 19' E. 100.0 feet along the existing West right-of-way of City View Drive to the place of beginning, and containing 2000 square feet (0.04 acres) more or less. Parcel No. 4 A strip of land being the East 20 feet of a parcel out of Block 12, Priddy Subdi- vision of the G. W. Scott Survey A-254, and is described in Vol . 1074, Page 343, in the Deed records of Wichita County, Texas , said 20 feet wide strip is described by metes and bounds , as follows : Beginning at a point in the East property line of Block 12, said point bearing from the Southeast corner of Block 12, N 000 19' W. 100.0 feet. THENCE N 800 00' W. 20.4 feet; THENCE N 000 19' W. 210.1 feet; THENCE S 800 00' E. 20.4 feet; THENCE S 000 19' E. 210.1 feet along the existing West right-of-way of City View Drive to the place of beginning, and containing 4202 square feet (0.10 acres) more or less. Total values approved in this resolution------------------$4,642.00 Section No. 2. The approved values of such properties are hereby approved, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to purchase by warranty deed such tracts of land in the name of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas. The authorized price to be paid for such tracts are the values as determined by the appraisals made by the independent appraiser referred to above. Section No. 3. In the event the City Manager is unable to purchase any such tract for such approved value, he is hereby authorized and directed to cause to be instituted condemnation proceedings to obtain such tract in the name of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas. He is further authorized, when in his judgment it appears to be in the best interest of the City to do so, to purchase such property for more than the appraised value in order to save the estimated cost of condemnation. Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays: None Item 5a RESOLUTION NO. 2847 RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT TO NUNN ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR INSTALLATION OF BALLFIELD LIGHTING AT SPUDDER PARK. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls has advertised for bids for the installation of ballfield lighting at Spudder Park; and, WHEREAS, two bids were received, and it is found that Nunn Electric Company, whose bid of $16,828.80, including their bid on Alternative No. 1 , is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: 121 Item 5a, cont'd. Said total bid, including Alternative No. 1 as accepted, of Nunn Electric, in the amount of $16,828.30 is hereby accepted, and the City Manager is authorized to .execute for the City of Wichita Falls a contract with Nunn Electric, for the in- stallation of such ballfield lights at Spudder Park plus the installation of eight additional fixtures and poles as shown on Alternative No. 1 . Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas , and Boston Nays : None Item 5c RESOLUTION NO. 2848 RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT TO WATER TANK SERVICE COMPANY FOR REPAIR AND PAINTING OF THE 1MG ELEVATED POTABLE WATER STORAGE TANK AT DENVER STREET. WHEREAS, eight bids were received for repair and painting of the Denver Street tower; and, WHEREAS, the bid of Water Tank Service Company, Dallas, Texas, is the lowest responsible bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Said bid of Water Tank Service Company in the amount of $60,200.00 is hereby accepted, and the City Manager is authorized to execute for the City of Wichita Falls a contract for the repair and painting of the Denver tank. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays : None Item 7a Minutes of the meeting of the Parks Board held August 25, 1981 , were received. Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas , and Boston Nays: None Item 4b A proposed resolution was presented approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with the Wichita County Heritage Society for a City of Wichita Falls Historical Preservation Survey and Plan. Alderman Shearman questioned the purpose of this study. He questioned Para- graph (c) on Page 2 of the contract. He also questioned Paragraph D 2 (a) in the Scope of Services regarding legal controls. He asked how it would benefit the City as a whole? The City Manager explained what the agreement is intended to do. The Heritage Society has already proceeded with a portion of the plan. This money would be spent for a consultant to identify historical structures, and architecturally significant structures. He stated that under D 2 (a) , this could get into the landmark preserva- tion ordinance. Alderman Thomas also asked what value this study will be generally to the citi- zens of Wichita Falls? Alderman Shearman stated that he is very much opposed to giving someone legal right over someone else's property. Alderman Thomas questioned whether we legally promised them this $16,000? City Manager Stuart Bach stated that they had proceeded on this basis. Alderman Smith stated that there are some tax advantages on a program of this kind. He asked if this would apply? He stated that he is also concerned about stepping on other people's rights. RESOLUTION NO. 2849 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A C014TRACT WITH THE WICHITA COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY FOR A CITY OF WICHITA FALLS HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SURVEY AND PLANS. 122 Item 4b, cont'd. WHEREAS, the Wichita County Heritage Society has requested funds for a City of Wichita Falls Historical Preservation Survey and Plans; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen agreed to provide a maximum of $16,000 from FY 1981-82 Community Development Block Grant program funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: The City Manager is authorized to execute a contract, a copy of which is attached hereto, with the Wichita County Heritage Society for a City of Wichita Falls Preservation Survey and Plans, for an amount not to exceed $16,000. Moved by Alderman Smith that Resolution No. 2849 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Thomas. Mayor Hill stated that he would only agree on the basis of the people being on a voluntary basis. Aldermen Thomas and Shearman agreed that we should do these studies when we can, and only get a consultant when we cannot do it. The motion was carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays : Alderman Shearman Item 5b Bids were considered for the purchase of a picnic shelter at Jalonick Park. Alderman Thomas asked who would put the structure together? Bill Hursh, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that they would. Alderman Thomas asked if we could save money by getting someone to construct it, and buy from our local lumber yards? Bill Hursh stated that he did not know whether we had that capability here in Wichita Falls. It is a system where you bend this into shape. Alderman Shearman stated that he would like to see what we are buying. He is disappointed with the bus stop on Indiana. He would like to see our local people construct it. We have a lot of contractors out of work. He believes we can do it cheaper. Bill Hursh stated that the Parks Board had reviewed it. They checked into the matter, and decided to use wood canopy because it is more attractive. The City Manager stated it is one way to dress up the looks of our parks. We will have some problems with metal buildings, as well as wood. Alderman Shearman stated that he would like to see us look into the possibility of a metal shelter. Alderman Smith stated that this is not just buying a finished product. Construction costs have not come down. He feels they will be surprised at the local prices. Moved by Alderman Smith that the bid for a wooden picnic shelter at Jalonick Park be awarded to Knori Associates, In. , of Friendswood, Texas, in the amount of $7,387.00. Motion seconded by Alderman Thomas , and carried unanimously. Item 6a Authority was requested to advertise for bids for construction of the Southside Community Center. Alderman Shearman asked about the stucco exterior, which will raise the cost factor. He would like to see us look into a metal type building. The upkeep is less on metal . Stucco in this part of the country has a tendency to crack. The City Manager stated that, again, the intent was to try to build something more attractive. Administrative Assistant Mark Watson stated that it would be located behind Bonham School on Armory Road. They have been waiting for a community center for 123 Item 6a, cont'd. two years. He stated that we can afford the metal building. We would like to stucco it in order to make it aesthetically pleasing. Alderman Thomas asked what will be the future of the neighborhood centers? The City Manager stated this will be looked at by the Parks Department. Alderman Thomas asked if most of the support for community centers has come from the federal government? The City Manager stated that CAC had supported some of this. Mark Watson stated that the Southside has a strong neighborhood group. Moved by Alderman Smith that authority be granted to advertise for bids for con- struction of the Southside Community Center. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. Mayor Hill congratulated Mark Watson on his new position as City Manager of Stamford, Texas. Item 8a The public hearing was opened on the proposed annual budget and work program for 1981 -82. Slides of various programs were shown and the City Manager explained the revenue sources for each fund. The general fund was explained. Mayor Hill asked how the rent for the Activities Center compares with the expenses of it? The City Manager stated that it has always been subsidized by the hotel -motel tax. Alderman Shearman stated that the Activities Center is certainly a blessing for the City of Wichita Falls, even though he did not support it in the beginning. It is a beautiful place, and well-kept. It was noted that the cost to operate the Activities Center was $325,624. Revenues amounted to $141 ,200. The hotel -motel tax applied was $93,000. The transit fund was explained. The main source of revenue will be the inter- transfer from the general fund. The new transportation superintendent is making a study on what our rates should be, etc. Major decisions will be made in the tran- sit program in the next three years. The federal government picks up half of our loss. Jack Griffin, Acting Director of Traffic and Transportation, stated that there are some regulations on the replacement age of busses before UMTA will participate. Some of the small busses are not holding up. They are having all sorts of mechanical problems with the small busses. The large diesel busses are giving us some problems, but not as much as the smaller ones. The City Manager stated that, depending upon the outcome of the study, they may replace ten busses next year. The water and sewer fund was discussed by the City Manager. He also noted the Martin Luther King Center, Data Processing, Health Department, and Risk Management. Alderman Shearman suggested that we purchase ten sirens instead of five. He would rather the money be put in sirens than some of the studies we run. The Street Department was discussed. It includes a street sweeper, curb and gutter repairs, and overall performance of maintenance improvement. The Sanitation Department is projected to expand Project NEAT with an additional six trailers. It will cost more to haul trash to the landfill with two or three men on the truck. The trucks also cost more. Parks , Traffic Engineering, Activities Center Parking Lot lighting, and Public Utilities were discussed. In Public Utilities , we have set aside $163,000 overall for improvements to Lake Kickapoo dam, and also for an in- spector to inspect the utility work performed by contractors. Mayor Hill stated that he had had a number of people ask him why we need this much lighting on the expressway. It was noted that they are converting to high pressure sodium lights, which will keep the level of light at a constant thing. The level of lighting will be somewhat reduced, and the cost will also be reduced. The public hearing on the budget was closed. 124 Item 8b The public hearing was opened on the proposed general revenue sharing budget. The City Manager noted that there is $1 ,289,771 available. He also foresees $27,000 extra. Of this extra $27,000, he proposed to place $10,000 in the family residency program, $5,000 for the new telephone system, and $12,000 in street maintenance. He also explained how the $1 ,298,771 would be spent. Mayor Hill asked about restroom facilities in Weeks Park. He asked Bill Hursh why we do not have this in the budget? He would like this to be recon- sidered. The City Manager stated that they would do some costing on it. Alderman Thomas agreed that the addition of a restroom on the back nine would add immeasur- ably to it. Mayor Hill also noted that the greens are in bad condition. Bill Hursh stated that crab grass is a big problem for them. Dr. Robert L. Barenberg appeared for the family residency program, which is located on Seventh Street. He stated that he appreciated the recommendation for continued funding of that program. He presented material to the Council on medical and primary care. He stated that he would be talking to the County at 10:30 on Thursday regarding their support of the program. They would like to recruit those who have a high chance of remaining in Wichita Falls. The public hearing was closed. The Board of Aldermen recessed at 10:20, and resumed the meeting at 10:40. Item 9a A proposed appropriation ordinance was presented to fund construction of a sanitary sewer interceptor line, and for supplemented unanticipated cost increases in the Public Utilities Department operating budget. ORDINANCE NO. 3824 AN ORDINANCE MAKING AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE WATER & SEWER REVENUE FUND TO ACCOUNT NUMBERS LISTED BELOW, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3824 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays : None Item 9b A proposed ordinance was presented, reappropriating general revenue sharing funds from entitlement periods eight and ten for use in funding construction of a sanitary sewer interceptor line. ORDINANCE NO. 3825 AN ORDINANCE MAKING A RE-APPROPRIATION OF GENERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS TO THE ACCOUNT NUMBERS LISTED BELOW, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3825 be passed. Motion seconded hy Alderman Shearman, and carried by the following vote. Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays: None - - - - - - - - - - Item 10a A proposed ordinance was presented amending the City's franchise ordinance with Lone Star Gas Company to permit the installation, maintenance, repair and/or replacement of customer service lines, and authorizing charging for same. 125 Item 10a, cont'd. Moved by Alderman Shearman that the proposed ordinance be tabled. Motion seconded by Alderman Thomas. Alderman Thomas asked why we need an ordinance? Why don't we just do nothing? We have too many regulations in life as it is. We have gotten along fine just like it is. Is it not done by Lone Star on a cost basis? David Liles, Lone Star Gas Company, stated we had operated for a number of years with no problems until federal regulations placed different responsibilities on the gas operator for the safe transportation of the gas on the way the line is installed, the material used, and the maintenance of it. It was previously done by local plumbers according to the City'� code. Alderman Shearman asked if we do not have city ordinances that specify mater- ial , etc.? Mr. Liles stated that we do, but they are in direct conflict with fed- eral regulations. In the federal regulations, the persons performing the services have to be certified. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. , stated that regulations pro- mulgated on the basis of the law carry the weight of the law. Mr. Liles made a presentation concerning federal regulations on transportation and service lines. He stated that the regulation imposes a duty and responsibility on the gas operator to make sure the gas service lines up to the meter are installed and maintained according to the regulations . They have provided an amendment that would provide the control to match the responsibility given by the regulations. It would cost each customer ninety six cents per year, starting five years from now. He believes the more compelling reason is that the gas company is being held respon- sible for compliance with these regulations. If the gas operator is to be held responsible, then they whould be allowed to perform the work. One city out of 388 who have approved their version of the ordinance has required a plumber to do the work. Four hundred five (405) cities have been contacted by Lone Star Gas Company. Alderman Thomas asked if we do not pass an ordinance, does that release him of the responsibility? City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. , stated that it did not. Alderman Shearman stated if the pipeline up to the meter is inspected, and it does not pass their inspection, they do not turn the gas on, and this seems to be pretty good control . Mr. Liles stated it is not just the initial pressure test, but what happens to the service line through the years . (Mayor Hill announced that it is 11 :00 o'clock, and no more bond bids will be accepted after this time. Bids were presented to Harold McInroe, of the First Southwest Company in Dallas. Mayor Hill stated that they would open the bids following completion of the discussion presently being held. ) Mr. Liles stated that Lone Star would send one man out, and he would do all the repair and inspection. Mayor Hill stated that he cannot see a resident having to pay for two or three calls. He stated that we must take care of the public. Alder- man Shearman stated that he had been in the service business for 20 years. If we do this, it would give Lone Star Gas Company a monopoly. Mr. Liles stated that when federal regulations were passed, it was for the transportation safety of the gas. The reason they were placed in that responsibility was that they were the operator. They did not seek this responsibility. Joe Meissner appeared as President of Bailey Meissner Company, stating they are in the supply business. He feels strongly about the principle of the thing. If it is not definitely required, why do it? Any service provided has to be paid for some way. We are not talking about all the service lines in Wichita Falls, just the service line on the meter. The ordinance gives the customer a choice of who does the work. Lone Star Gas Company is in the business to sell gas. They are acting under the umbrella of protection of the government. To place them in direct competition with private enterprise is against the basic principles. Let's change the plumbing codes if they are not doing it right. Why change things when they are working pretty well now? The City Manager stated that the federal law states that the gas company has the responsibility to see that all service lines are installed properly, but it does not say that they are responsible for installing them. Alderman Shearman stated that 126 Item 10a, cont'd. the way it stands now, the plumber makes a mercury check, the inspector makes a check, and before the gas is turned on there is another check made. Mr. Liles stated that the initial pressure check is not the problem, but the service line coming into it. If an accident occured as a result of an improperly installed service line, and the federal government and the Railroad Commission determines that it was improperly installed, who do you think will be standing first in line to receive the blunt where civil damages are concerned? You can understand why we want to do it ourselves. Alderman Shearman asked if our plumbers are licensed by the State of Texas or by the City? It was pointed out that they are licensed by the State of Texas, and registered with the City. He stated that he would want his line hooked up by a licensed plumber. Mr. Liles stated that he had no licensed plumber on his staff. The motion to table the proposed ordinance was carried by the following vote. Ayes : Aldermen Shearman, Thomas, and Boston Nays : Mayor Hill and Alderman Smith Items 10d,e Harold McInroe, of the First Southwest Company in Dallas , opened bids on $4,990,000 General Obligation and $1 ,070,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds .Bids with effective interest rates are as follows. General Obligation Bonds : Underwood Neuhaus Co. 11 .587394 Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. 11 .513277 Republic National Bank of Dallas 11 .590719 First National Bank of Dallas 11 .6253 Water & Sewer Revenue Merrill Lynch White Weld Capital Markets Group 12.0564 Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. 11 .860368 Schneider Bernet Hickman 12.192775 Blythe Eastman Payne Webber 12.3303 Rauscher Pierce Refnes, Inc. 12.043925 The apparent low bidder on both issues was Dean Witter Reynolds , Inc. , at an effective interest rate of 11 .513277 percent on the General Obligation Bonds, and 11 .860368 on the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. Mr. McInroe stated that he feels the market will stay in this high plane for quite some time. He stated this represents a good bid in line with the market place today. The bond rating firms stated that a 90-day wait would not be harmful for the City of Wichita Falls in its rating. He does not believe we will see any decrease in these rates for at least three to six months, and probably would not be a great decrease. Mayor Hill stated that he feels if we really need these things, then we should go ahead with it. Alderman Smith stated that with Central Garage and other projects in the City, he feels we should go ahead with it. Mr. McInroe left to tabulate and check the bids for accuracy. Upon his return, the following action was taken. Moved by Alderman Thomas that the bid on the General Obligation Bonds be awarded to Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 3828 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF CITY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1981 , IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $4,990,000, AND CALLING CERTAIN CITY CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION FOR REDEMPTION PRIOR TO MATURITY. 127 Items ]Od,e, cont'd. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3828 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays: None Moved by Alderman Thomas that the bid on the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds be awarded to Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 3829 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3829 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays : None Item 10b A proposed ordinance was presented prohibiting operation or parking of motor vehicles on Lake Wichita dam. ORDINANCE NO. 3826 ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE OPERATION OR PARKING OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON LAKE WICHITA DAM. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3826 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays: None Item 10c A proposed ordinance was presented waiving certain section of the Code of Ordinances prohibiting signs and other advertising devices in public parks. ORDINANCE NO. 3827 ORDINANCE WAIVING SECTION 22-1 , SUBSECTION (a) (9) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ALLOW ADVERTISING SIGNS AT HAMILTON PARK TENNIS CENTER DURING PENN-LITE TENNIS TOURNAMENT. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No.. 3827 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas , and Boston Nays: None Item lla A proposed resolution was presented authorizing publication of a notice of intention to lease for oil and gas exploration certain lands located at Lake Kickapoo in Archer County, Texas. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that we own the minerals in this case. Alderman Shearman asked if we are going to sell the deep and shallow, and what is 128 Item lla, cont'd. the definition of deep and shallow? It was noted that these questions would be addressed in the contract. RESOLUTION NO. 2850 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO LEASE FOR OIL AND GAS CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED AT LAKE KICKAPOO IN ARCHER COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls has received a request that certain lands owned by the City at Lake Kickapoo in Archer County, Texas, be leased for oil and gas exploration and production. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 . It is advisable, under proper circumstances, to lease for the development of oil and gas all , or part, of the following tracts of land located at Lake Kickapoo, Archer County, Texas, to-wit: 364.8 acres, more or less, in four tracts, all of which are described by metes and bounds in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incor- porated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Any such oil and gas lease shall provide for at least 1/8 royalty, and shall have a primary term of no more than 10 years. SECTION 3. Any such oil and gas lease may include a pooling provision which meets with the requirements of Subchapter B of Chapter 71 of the Natural Resources Code of the State of Texas. SECTION 4. Under any such oil and gas lease, no actual drilling may occur on the property covered by such lease unless the location of such well is approved in advance by the City, and meets the specifications designated for protecting the water in the lake; provided, however, such provision would not prohibit the drill- ing of a well on other lands with which a portion of the leased property was pooled nor the drilling of a directional well under such property. SECTION 5. City shall give notice of intention to lease such lands by publi- cation once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper published in the County, which notice shall describe the land and designate the time and place at which the Board of Aldermen will receive and consider bids for such lease. SECTION 6. City will not warrant the title to minerals in such lands. SECTION 7. The Board of Aldermen reserves the right to reject any and all bids, and to give notice and call for additional bids, if same is determined to be in the best interest of the City. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Resolution No. 2850 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried by the following vote. Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays: None Item Ilb A proposed resolution was presented calling a public hearing on September 25, 1981 , at 5:00 P.M. , in regard to revisions to the City's effective tax rate. RESOLUTION NO. 2851 RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING AS REQUIRED BY THE TRUTH IN TAXATION ACT ASSOCIATED WITH REVISIONS TO THE CITY'S EFFECTIVE TAX RATE. WHEREAS, the Truth in Taxation Act adopted by the Legislature in its Second Called Session in 1978 requires a public hearing in the event that the proposed 129 Item llb, cont'd. tax rate for the current year exceeds by more than 3% the effective tax rate for the preceding year; and, WHEREAS, the effective tax rate, in general , is that tax rate which would have produced the total tax revenue assessed the previous year if it were applied to the total taxable value assessed in the current year on the properties which were taxed in the preceding year; and, WHEREAS, the effective tax rate for 1980 is calculated to be $.71 per $100 valuation (although the actual tax rate levied was $.75) , and the Board of Aldermen proposes to adopt a tax rate for 1981 of $.75 per $100 valuation which exceeds the effective rate by more than 3%. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Public notice shall be given of the intention of the Board of Aldermen to adopt a higher tax rate than the effective $.71 tax rate of last year, and a public hear- ing on such proposed increase shall be held on September 25, 1981 , at 5:00 o'clock P.M. , in the Council Room of Memorial Auditorium Building, at which hearing propon- ents and opponents of the tax increase will be afforded adequate opportunity to present their views. The City Clerk shall publish in a newspaper, not less than 7 days before such public hearing, a notice of the public hearing in the form required by the Truth in Taxation Act. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Resolution No. 2851 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas, and Boston Nays: None The following vote was taken by the Board of Aldermen to indicate those who now propose to set a tax rate of $.75 per $100.00 valuation, so that the required legal notice of the public hearing can be prepared. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Smith, Thomas , and Boston Nays: None Item llc A proposed resolution was presented awarding the bid for the Scotland inter- ceptor sanitary sewer lines. RESOLUTION NO. 2852 RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT TO BROWN & CRIS, INC. , FOR INSTALLATION OF THE SCOTLAND ADDITION INTERCEPTOR SANITARY SEWER LINES. WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls advertised for bids for a sanitary sewer in- terceptor line located in the Scotland Addition to Wichita Falls; and, WHEREAS, six bids were received; and, WHEREAS, we asked for and received from each a bid using clay pipe and alter- nates on both plastic pipe and concrete pipe; and, WHEREAS, the bid of Brown and Cris, Inc. , with the alternate bid using concrete pipe in the amount of $540,437.46 was the lowest responsible bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Said bid of Brown & Cris, Inc. , in the amount of $540,437.46 is hereby accepted, and the City Manager is authorized to execute for the City of Wichita Falls a contract with Brown & Cris, Inc. , for the construction of such facilities. 130 Item 11c, cont'd. Moved by Alderman Shearman that Resolution No. 2852 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Thomas, and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Thomas, and Boston Nays : None (Alderman Smith was out of the room) Item Ild A proposed resolution was presented approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the City's tire supply contract. Ayres Oil Company has purchased Gulley Tire Company. RESOLUTION NO. 2853 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S TIRE SUPPLY CONTRACT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: The amendment of the City's tire supply contract with Gulley Tire Co. , which will substitute Ayres Oil Company for Gulley Tire Co. , allow the substitution of Ayres Oil Company performance bond, and the release of Gulley Tire Co. from their bond, is approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute such amendment to the tire supply contract. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Resolution No. 2853 be passed. Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried by the following vote. Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Shearman, Thomas, and Boston Nays : None (Alderman Smith was out of the room) Item 12a City Clerk Wilma Thomas reported to the Board of Aldermen that the Initiative and Referendum petitions on the transfer station had met charter requirements. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. outlined the procedure which the Board of Aldermen would need to follow, and the options available to them. The referendum petition requires the fewest number of actions. Robert K. Roach, 1604 Singleton, appeared as Attorney for the petitioners, stating that the concern for the initiative petition, and the time of the election, are maximum limitations . They are not minimum. The time could be shortened. The City Attorney stated that he feels they could meet the January 15 date for the election. By December 5, the Board of Aldermen should have taken the final action on it if they want to have the election in January. He recommended that the Coun- cil take final action on both of these petitions by December 5. Mr. Roach stated that these petitions in no way challenge any decision on the landfill ; only the transfer station. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. read the proposal as stated in the Initiative petition. Mike McAfee, 2711 Taft, stated it is true that the City collects 50 percent of the trash in the Southwest quadrant of the City. Mayor Hill estimated 65 per- cent. Mr. McAfee stated that the City only collects 50 percent of the refuse generated in the City. Individuals and industry also haul trash. He stated that the Lawrence Road location is not closer to the centroid of the City when you con- sider all of the trash that is generated and hauled. The Seymour Highway is on a direct route to the landfill , and he does not agree that it would be more expen- sive to locate it on the Seymour Highway. City Attorney H. P. Hodge, Jr. stated that all they need to do today is refer it to a committee of the council , and make provision for public hearings . 131 Item 12a, cont'd. Moved by Alderman Thomas that the full Council be named as the Committee of the Whole. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. Items 12c,d The Board of Aldermen went into executive session pursuant to Article 6252-17, Section 2, Subsection (g) of the Revised Texas Civil Statutes. The meeting re- convened, and the following action was taken. Moved by Alderman Thomas that Fred Werner be appointed Chief Accounting Officer. Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously. Moved by Alderman Thomas that the following be appointed or reappointed to the Mayor's Commission on the Status of Women for two-year terms to expire September 30, 1983. Greg Merkle--Appointed Diane Felix�-Appointed (These appointments replace Owanah Anderson and Barbara Glickman. ) Joi Anne Garrett--Reappointed Marie Jones--Reappointed Joan Mason--Reappointed Joyce Square--Reappointed Kathleen Myer--Reappointed Sandrea Marvel--Reappointed Blanche Donnell--Reappointed Barbra Thomas--Reappointed Dorothy Roberts (Ex-Officio)--Reappointed Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried unanimously. The Board of Aldermen adjourned at 1 :15 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED this C��r4ay of 1981 . Mayor- ATTEST: City Clerk THE STATE OF TEXAS lx'N--OW ALL MEN- BY THESE PRESE.XTS: COU:N-TY OF--------�iic-h i-t-a----------------- THIS AGREEMENT entered into by and between TEXAS ELECTIZIC SEM710E COMPANY, a corporation of Fort Worth, Tcxas, hereinafter called "Grantor", and TI,e C-J t III o f Wichita Falls hereinafter called "Grantee", WITNESSETH: ' 1. 00 Ofte and no/100 Dollars ($ In consideration of the sum Of gns, sub paid by Grantee, the reccipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby I-rants to Grantee, its successors and assi- - ject to the provisions and conditions hereinafter stated, a right-of-way or easement over and across the land hereinaiter Gle- cribed, and the right to construct, maintain, and operate a concrete alley Said right-of-way or easement being through and upon Grantor's land situated in Count7, --S-tate of Texas, and described as follows: Q Being part of a 3. 609 acre tract of land out of Block 43 of the Kem- and Newby Subdivision, Cherokee County School Land Survey, Abstract 33 , Wichita County, Texas , conveyed to Texas Electric Service Company by a deed recorded in Volume 993, Pages 186-188 , Deed Records of Wich4ta County, Texas , and beina more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows : Beginning at a point, said point being the Southeast corner of said 3. 609 acre tract, Thence North 57 0 20 ' West 5. 37 feet along the South pro-,,-)ertv line of said 3 . 609 acre tract, said line also being the North right-of-way line of a dedicated street; Thence North 00 0 201 West 1628 . 58 feet, 4 . 5 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said 3 . 609 acre tract, to a point, said point being the beginning of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 30 . 5 feet; Thence along said curve an arc distance of 47 . 90 feet to a point; Thence South 89 0 41 ' West 370 .'2 feet to a point, said point being in the most westerly West line of said 3 . 609 acre tract and in the East right-of-way lin,� of the East service road of U.S . Expressway �,281; 0 4 Thence North 00 22 ' East along the most westerly West line of said 3. 609 acre tract, 4 . 5 feet to a point, said point being the Northwest corner of said 3. 609 acre tract; Thence North 89 0 411 East, along the North line of said 3 . 609 acre tract, 405 . 2 feet to a point for corner, said point being the Northeast corner of said 3. 609 acre tract; Thence South 00 0 201 East, along the East line of said 3.609 acre tract, 1666 . 5 feet to the point of beginning and containing in all 0. 2179 acres of land, more or less. This property is further shown on Sketch #WFT-81-7 which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. It is understood that the West and or South line of the above described property be one and the same as the West and or South edge of the concrete alley. It is also undc�rqtood that the construction and maintenance of said concrete alley be completed at no cost to Grantor. On Grantor' s adjacent property there are facilities which require down guys and anchors in order to remain stable. These anchors may be beneath the completed concrete alley. It is understood that should these anchors ever need replacing, it will be the sole responsibility of the Grantee to repair any portion of the concrete alley which may be damaged during the process of replacing the anchbrs. It is also understood that Grantee will install barriers, as per the attached Sketch #WFT-81-6 , around the two existing down. guys that are nearest the proposed concrete alley at no cost to Grantor. CLERK'S CERTIFICATE THE STATE OF TEX_-�S COUNTYOF--------------------------------------- I-----------------------------------------------------------—-----------I County Clerk of the County Court of said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument of writing dated on the------------------------day of-------------------------------------- -CIL D. 19--------- with its Cert:ficate of Authentication,was filcd for record in my office on the------------------------day of------------------------------------- A. D. 19--------- at----------------o'clock---------!I., and duly recorded this----------------------day of----------—--—--------------------- A. D. 19--------- at----------------o'clock_---_ in the---------------------------------------------------records of said County, in Volume---—------------------- on pages---------------------- WITNESS MY IIAND AND SEAL OF THE COUNTY COURT of said County, at office in--------------------------- the day and year last above w-ritten. ------------------------------- n4-y C_ County Clerk--------------—-----------------------___Cou T xa& By--------------------------------- Deput7 z LU _P: C): Uj �11 z E-4 U *4 LU 0 0: U 9 E-4 W >1 P; E-­ CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGIMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTYOF............................................... BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared................... .....................................................................................................................................................................................................Imown to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of. thesaid............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... a corporation, and that he executed the same as the act of such corporation for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the....................day of......................................................A. D., 19.............. (L. S.) ..................................................................................................................... Notary Public in and for County,Texas. CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGAIE NT THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTYOF............................................... 13EFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared................... ....................................................................................................................................., known to ine to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said....................................................................................................................................................................................................................—_ a corporation, and that he executed the same as the act of such corporation for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the........................day of..................................................A. D., 19......... .................................................................... Notary Public in and for County, Texas GUY 3-0 7-0 1�71 �V17-21 0�7 -1 rz-zz Nq 90 A"' J-� c o c%i 0) C) Lo "E&T-j > 0 IL V) L) L) LJ Z4 Q) w z y Ld < > z -j cr C15 -i LLJ a. 0 0 W 0 U) 0 L, M: _j U) < 0 LL- ui —j LLJ 00 Q) �— X Li Up N I AAIH 15 lu zl V-N Le) SERVICE CONTRACT 15�- WICHITA COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY 124 62, 11 THIS AGRE24ENT, entered into on this day, October 1, 1981 by and between the Wichita County Heritage Society, herein called the "Contractor" and the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, herein called the "Planning Agency", WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the Planning Agency desires to engage the Contractor to prepare a Historic Preservation Survey and Plan for the City of Wichita Falls which is expected to be financed in part by the Planning Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows : 1. Employment-of Contractor. The Planning Agency hereby agrees to engage the Contractor and the Contractor hereby agrees to perform in cooperation with the Planning Agency in the preparation of a Historic Preservation Survey and Plan for the City of Wichita Falls. 2. Area Covere-d- The Contractor shall perform all the necessary services provided under this contract in connection with and respecting the following area: the Portion of the incorporated area of the City Of Wichita Falls, as shown on the attached map (Attachment 1) . 3. Scope of Services. (a) The Contractor shall do, perform and carry out or cause to be done, performed, and carried out by a subcontractor authorized by the Planning Agency, in a satisfactory and proper manner, determined by the Planning Agency, the services described in the scope of services for the contract between the Contractor and subcontractor described in Attachment 2. (b) The Contractor shall submit to the Planning Agency, a camera ready copy of the "Historic Preservation Survey and Plan" for the City of Wichita Falls. 4. Personnel. (a) The Contractor represents that he has, or will, secure all personnel required in performing the services under this contract. Such personnel -3- termination. The Contractor shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed prior to such termination. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the Planning Agency for damages sustained by the Planning Agency by virtue of any breach of the contract by the Contractor, and the Planning Agency may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purposes of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damages due the Planning Agency from the Contractor is determined. 9. Termination for Convenience Of Planning Agency or Contractor. if either party to this agreement should desil re to terminate it Prior to the date of expiration, they may do so by giving sixty (60) days notice in writing to the other party of their intention to terminate this agreement; otherwise, this agreement shall continue in full force and effect until the expiration of the term set out above. 10. Termination of Contract for Cause by the contractor. If work is Stopped for a period of thirty (30) days by the Planning Agency, or as a result of an act Of government, such as a declaration of a national emergency, through no act or fault of the Contractor, then the Contractor may, upon seven (7) additional days written notice to the Planning Agency, terminate the contract and recover from the Planning Agency payment for all work executed. 11. Changes. The Planni ng Agency may, from time to time, require changes in the scope of services of the Contractor to be performed hereunder. Such changes including any increase or decrease in the amount of the contractor's compensation, deviations in project schedule, and/or work scope which are mutually agreed upon by and between the Planning Agency and the Contractor shall be incorporated in written amendments to this contract. -5- 13* Interest of _Members Of Plannina Agency and Others- '�O Officer, member, or employee of the Planning Agency and no members of - Its governing body of the locality or localities in which the Project is situated or being carried out who exercises any functions or responsibilities in the review or approval of the undertaking or carrying out of this Project, shall participate in any decisions relating to this contract which affects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he is, direct or indirect, in this contract or the proceeds thereof. 14. Assignability. The Contractor shall not assign any interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or notation) , without the prior written consent of the Planning 0 Agency thereto: Provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to the Contractor from the Planning Agency under this contract may he assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval, notice of any such assignment, or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the Planning Agency. 15. Interest Of Contractor. The Contractor covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed in this contract. The Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this contract no person having any such interest shall be employed. 16. Audits and Inspections. At any time during normal business flours as often as the Planning Agency or HUD may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the Planning Agency or HUD for examination all Of its records witil respect to all matters covered by this contract and will permit the Planning Agency or HUD to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records ATTACITIENT 7f,- t U eop, LK,WE EJLJE]f ILJLL�j 40 A 1,, L -I lr_ &J/ �Ul' Lj UJ ,7W 17, j VD/ I ILI AN" 6111--Ir LIN_JLJ L �J' Ilk V L 17 1!17 Tf. /I 1 0 1000 3000 __8 SCALE 5000 FEET MAP OF WICHITA FALLS z TP.XA .q I . - jk, , d) The large enclosed area (4) On the Map covers the Portion of the - 0 city to be selectively surveyed for the most or representative structures, significant neighborhoods. buildings, sites, objects, and "ORMS AND MATERIALS The Contractor will develop along with the Client� the survey forms that will be printed and Supplied by the Client. In addi- tiOn, the client will use data and other a p furnish work maps, aerial photocrraphs, land P t ?21 ropriate materials hat are existing, avail- able and necessary for the survey work. The Con Ply the film and camera. tractor will sup_ 3. ACTIVITY The following guidelines Will be applied: a) The Survey will information rela include a listing and inventory that contains ting to architectural style and/or form, past and present use, age (When determinable) , ownership and other key factors as deemed necessary by the Client and the Contrac- tor. b) The Survey forms and Photography including processing will be completed by the Contractor. C) The Survey shall Use Public and Private resources to the greatest extent Possible. (see Sections .0 and E) —C. VOLUNTEERS -Z-� The Contractor will work closely with the Client organization and Other interested 9 and talents of th rouPs to Coordinate and incorporate the efforts ese groups as much as Possible in the compilation Of historical data regarding specific roperties for which the Client will secure a minimum Of ten P (10) volunteers. 1 , The Contractor will train the volunteers data using to Collect historical and printed instructions and forms Prepared by the Contractor by the Client. 2. The volunteers will be obtained by February 3, 1981. 3- Volunteers will be latter will be responsible for the volunteers adhering to the research schedule. responsible to the Project Coordinator- The 4. Data given to the contractor will manner on the forms that be in an organized, legible are Provided. Basic informati 6 cluding present owner, legal address, lot , On in- 3 block, subdivision, and tax information will he Provided to the contractor. D- EVALUATION AND PRESERVATION PLAN The Contractor shall be responsible for the compilation and evalua- t'On Of the data collected during the course Of the survey. d) Demolition and relocation Of landmarks or Proposed landmarks. e) Preservation Priorities and Program Phases With term Prioritized goals and spec6 actio 10,19 and short n based On the survey. ific objectives for community f) Strategies for accomplishing these objectives ' sibilities Of Public and private sectors in m1ncluding respon- objective, legal and financial tools, sources Plementing each chitectural and Planning 0 tions. Th Of funding ar- ese measurable obje' Will be included in the MBP Ctives 0 Plan Of the City if the Plan is adopted by the City Council. Of Wichita Falls g) Glossary and bibliography. h) Storage and rep - Ository systems; explanation Of where and how to find information On properties surveyed. COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND R�EO R�TS During the course Of the Project, the Contractor will meet with var- 'Ous community groups. Between January and the end Of June 1982 make four (4) trips I the Contractor will Plete survey work an to Wichita Falls to train volunteers, com d Photography and meet with the project w group, and other community groups when appropriate ork and brief written progress report and agenda Of it A verbal discussed will be subm itted. ems to be 2- The Project work group wil I include the Pro - ject Coordinator, the President and Vice President Of the Heritage Society, the Chair- man Of the Landmark Co ning Division Of the C mmission and a representative Of the Plan- 'ty of Wichita Falls. 3. After survey research is Contractor will meet with Complete, at the end the project work roup to discuss re- commendations and Plan Outline. Of July 1982, the meeting will During thisg same trip an open be conducted including representatives of neighbor- hoods involved, the Planning Staff and Planning Board Of the City, Midtown Now Board Members, Historical Heritage Society and County Commission members, and input and discuss impljc ations of the City Council, to provide the plan, 4. The Contractor and the Project Coordinator will meet during the course Of the project with City departments to city Planning staff and appropriate obtain maps and data, and insure coordina- t'On Of Plan recommendations ment process review With the city Planning and manage- tiOn of exis ' of existing and future P lans, and considera- ting ordinance and code provisions. 5- The sixth trip by the Contractor wil discuss the draft I be in early October to Of the Plan as submitted. ATTACHMENT 3 REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST WICHITA COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY/CITY OF WICHITA FALLS CONTRACT a. Date: b. Reimbursement Request No. c. Project period covered: From To d. Costs previously reported to Planning Agency $ e. Cost presently listed to Planning Agency $ f. Less 5 % retainer $ 9. Reimbursement Request Amount $ I hereby certify that the attached invoice is true and correct and corresponds in every particular to the supplies and/or services contracted for. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE