Min 05/20/1980 37
Wichita Falls , Texas
Memorial Auditorium Building
May 20, 1980
Items 1 & 2
The Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, met in regular
session on the above date in the Council Room of the Memorial Auditorium Building
at 8:30 o'clock A.M. , with the following members present.
Kenneth Hill Mayor
Marvin Traywick
John Hampton, Jr.
Carol Russell Aldermen
Curtis Smith
Jim Thomas
Horace 0. Boston
Gerald Fox City Manager
H. P. Hodge, Jr. City Attorney
Gerald Carlson Chief Accounting Officer
Judy Baird Assistant City Clerk
i
The invocation was given by Paul Donaldson, First Church of God.
Item 3
Moved by Alderman Traywick that minutes of the meeting held May 13, 1980,
be approved.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried unanimously.
Items 4a - 9c
Item 5a was moved from the Consent to the Regular Agenda.
Moved by Alderman Russell that the remaining items on the consent agenda
be approved.
Motion seconded by Alderman Thomas.
Item 4a
1
ORDINANCE NO. 3666
ORDINANCE EXTENDING STATE OF DISASTER EMERGENCY FOR SEVEN DAYS.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays : None
Item 5b
/'RESOLUTION NO. 2526
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY TO BE CO-SPONSOR OF NATIONAL WORLD
GAMES FOR THE DEAF TENNIS TRYOUTS.
WHEREAS, the National World Games for the Deaf Tennis Tryouts will be held
in Wichita Falls on July 9 through 12, 1980, and the objective of the tryouts
is to select the most powerful contingent of deaf tennis players, both men and
women, to represent the United States in the XIV World Games for the Deaf which
will be held in Cologne, West Germany on July 23 to August 1 , 1981 ; and,
WHEREAS, this tournament is being sponsored by the Wichita Falls Tennis
Association, which has requested that the City of Wichita Falls co-sponsor such
tournament and allow free use of Hamilton Park tennis courts for the tournament.
i
38
Item 5b, cont'd.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA
FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The City of Wichita Falls is hereby authorized to co-sponsor the National
World Games for the Deaf Tennis Tryouts on June 9 through 12, 1980, and the court
fees for this tournament are hereby waived.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays : None
Item 6a
Low bid for a gasoline air compressor for Traffic was awarded to Joy Machinery
Co. , Dallas, Texas, for $6,509.50.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays : None
Item 6b
Low bid for 160,000 lbs. of fluosilicic acid for Water Purification was awarded
to Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. , Dallas, Texas, for $65.00 a ton.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays : None
Item 7a
RESOLUTION NO. 2527
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, AND THE FINAL ESTIMATE AND
ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF WICHITA FALLS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PHASE IV
IMPROVEMENTS.
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls and Timmins-Anderson Corp. , as contractor,
entered into a contract dated December 19, 1978, wherein said contractor agreed to
construct Wichita Falls Municipal Airport Phase IV Improvement; and,
WHEREAS, said construction has been completed in accordance with the plans
and specifications ; and,
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 has heretofore been approved by the Board of Aldermen;
and,
WHEREAS, Change No. 2 and the final estimate have been submitted on this project,
which final estimate shows a total amount of work done as $503,747.05, of which
$471 ,221 .14 has been paid to the contractor, leaving a balance of $32,525.91 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA
FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The construction of Wichita Falls Municipal Airport Phase IV Improvements is
accepted by the City of Wichita Falls , Change Order No. 2 and the final estimate
are approved, and the City Manager is directed to pay to the said contractor the
balance due as shown above.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays : None
i Item 8a
Authority was granted to advertise for bids for work boat for Water Source of
Supply.
39
Item 8a, cont'd.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
Item 8b
Authority was granted to advertise for bids for 400 tons of liquid chlorine
for Water Purification.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
Item 9
Minutes of the following boards and commissions were received.
a. Park Board, May 13, 1980
b. Plumbing Advisory Board, April 30, 1980
c. Centennial Commission, April 30, 1980
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
Item 5a
A proposed resolution was presented authorizing the City Manager to execute
a contract with Wichita Falls Independent School District for bus rental .
RESOLUTION NO. 2528
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT WITH WICHITA
FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR RENTAL OF BUS DURING JUNE AND
JULY, 1980, FOR SUMMER PLAYGROUND PARTICIPANTS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS,
THAT:
The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute, for the City of Wichita
Falls, a contract with the Wichita Falls Independent School District, whereby the
City would rent a school bus during June and July, 1980, such bus to be used for
transporting summer playground participants to the Lucy Park swimming pool for
swimming lessons, and for other special playground events. City shall pay school
district rental for such bus at the rate of $.50 per mile driven; in addition, City
shall furnish all gasoline, and shall provide liability and collision insurance on
such bus. City will furnish drivers for the bus, which drivers shall be limited
to certain specified individuals.
Alderman Hampton asked what the cost would be, and also where the funds
would come from?
Bill Hursh, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated the program is broken
down into three segments : (1 ) swimming lessons in Williams, Jalonic, and Lynwood
East Parks; (2) playground activities at 11 parks one time a week for eight weeks;
and, (3) special swimming sessions for playground participants, one afternoon a
week. Total cost for the eight weeks, plus insurance, would be under $1 ,000.
It was clarified that if the City buses were not available, the school buses
would be used. Also, that the Community Action Corporation would contribute up
to $1 ,950.
Moved by Alderman Hampton that Resolution No. 2528 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
40
Item lla
Flora Evers, an employee of the Activities Center, was honored as Employee of
the Month for May. Mayor Hill presented her with a plaque, and two tickets each
to a theatre and dinner.
Item l 0a
The public hearing on the sanitary landfill site was opened.
Mayor Hill stated this Council had been called upon to make some very heavy
decisions. He stated they may not please everybody here today, but each person on
this Council will vote the best way for the benefit of the City of Wichita Falls .
Louise Hunter, 611 Flood, stated she has been a resident of the east side for
the past 20 years. She expressed her displeasure to place the landfill on the east
side. If it was not thought of economically, to think of it morally. When the
decision is made, do not put it on the east side.
Harrison E. Taylor, 515 Duncan, stated the west side location is not the best
location with reference to the residences nearby. The east side location is not
the best location for the same reason. Access would be through Harding Street. He
stated a spokesman for the special interest group said they did not want the landfill
site anywhere on the west side. They do not want to take care of their own garbage.
The City will spend hundreds of dollars to develop the east side site. Why should
you spend hundreds of dollars to fight the special interest group? It would be
cheaper to fight the east side group. We think it is proper to come before the Council ,
and not try to intimidate you. Mr. Taylor presented a petition from the east side
opposing the landfill being placed there.
Angus Thompson, 608 Dee Drive, stated they have very little and must fight in
no uncertain terms to protect what they have. He presented a petition from the
east side opposing the landfill .
Hazel Burney, Rt. 5, Peterson Road, agreed with Angus Thompson.
David Williams , Blackflat, Texas, appeared as trustee for the McClellan Trust on
the east side. Part of the McClellan land is being considered for the east side
landfill site. Mr. Williams stated the McClellan ranch is one of the finest pieces
of grassland in the area. They do not want the dump. If the City is going to take
this land, they should be compensated for it. The land will have to be condemned.
He stated they are going to insist on an eight foot fence between the McClellan
property and the dump. Also, the run off from the dump is going to be close to the
river. A 12-inch rain will produce 104 million gallons of water. Just having a pond
out there will not take care of it. There will be pollution problems and all kinds
of health problems. The place will be expensive and dangerous. He stated they are
confident they will be paid a reasonable price for the land; however, the market value
of the ranch will be diminished considerably. Take 300 acres out and 2500 acres are
left. They will not be able to lease that land for as much as they could. The price
will have to be adjusted. The McClellan land would sell for $750,000.
Josie B. Roberts stated she lives three blocks from the dump, and does not
want the dump on the east side. She stated everything that is ugly is on the east
side. All the beautiful things are away from the east side. She stated they want
some beautification on the east side.
Bob Reece, Mayor of the City of Dean, stated he was here to speak on the opposition
to the landfill in the western part of Clay County. It would create problems. Trucks
would pass through the center of Dean. The residents are opposed to this. What about
fires? There will also be a rodent problem. Mr. Reece presented a petition from the
residents of the City of Dean.
Henry Krajca, who owns the land next to the McClellen ranch, stated the landfill
would ruin his water. He asked how the shallow water would be taken care of? He
does not want the landfill put there.
Mabel Harem, Rt. 5, asked the Council to consider their lives as important as
city people's.
41
Item 10a, cont'd.
Fred Fields , teacher, stated he did not want the landfill in his neighborhood.
Ernie Goins, 1615 Harding, stated the people on the east side are not threatening
lawyers. They ask the Council to think about the psychological aspect. He has not
gone through a summer without smelling the garbage and the sewer. He asked the
Council to think about the problems the east side has had to put up with, and to
make this decision, this one time, in favor of them.
Reginald Blow, 1409 Rosewood, stated he has been sharing the liabilities of
Wichita Falls. It is time for the rest of Wichita Falls to share in some of this
responsibility.
Bob Hillary, Southwest Parkway, stated the new site for the west side is one
and one-half to two miles from the previously considered site. This is not adequate
enough. He believes the citizens of Wichita Falls would be willing to have it moved
further out where it wouldn't bother any citizen of Wichita Falls. The human factor
is the number one thing to be considered.
Nick Seitz, Ponderosa Estates, stated they purchased their sites for retirement.
Sometimes it becomes necessary to sell their land. He asked the Council to consider
the health and traffic hazards. He also asked the Council to go back and reconsider
a better location for all concerned.
Howard Blow, 1409 Rosewood, stated everything bad has been placed on the east
side of town. He urged the Council to reconsider putting the landfill on the east
side from a moral standpoint.
Tom Carter, #3 Donnie Circle, presented petitions against the landfill site
at FM 369. The new site is in close proximity to the old site that had been
considered. He felt the site on the west side is the same site as the last one.
It is the same owner.
Lois Allen, 605 Edison, stated she was concerned about trucks going across
the overpass and trash blowing off. She did not want what little bit they had to
be ruined.
Mrs. Frank Krajca stated there would be a pollution hazard.
Lonny Morrison, 2025 Berkeley Street, stated he represented various residents
in the western portion of the city. He urged the Council to start looking for an
alternate route. The east side group is 100 per cent correct in their objections
to the access through Harding Street. Access is also available on Hwy. 79. The
location of the 77 Ranch site is not as close to populated areas as on the west
side. He stated there are three wells on the west side site as opposed to one on
the east side site. They question the $500,000 that is included in the cost estimate
for the pipeline relocation. The run off problem is present in both sites. There
are erosion problems for both sites; however, more erosion would be in the western
area because of more homes. He suggested locating the landfill away from the
city and share the additional cost among all of us who produce trash. Everyone
should share in that cost. People will see their property value lowered by $10,000
a home. He proposed that between the two sites, the 77 Ranch be chosen with an
.alternate route as opposed to Harding Street because of the reduction in the number
of home owners being affected. He also suggested finding another site and everyone
sharing in part of that cost.
Barbara Hansard, Hwy. 77 and 79, asked the Council to look at other places for
the landfill other than the ranch site.
Frank Douthitt, Rt. 1 , Henrietta, Commissioners Court of Clay County, appeared
on behalf of citizens concerned about the landfill . He stated he did not know
what effect the Wichita River would be on the east side site, but the water commission
and health commission would be put on notice. He questioned the Council 's power
outside Wichita County. If the Council voted to spend a large amount of money, Mr.
Douthitt anticipated a recall petition. He stated further study on a landfill site
is necessary. He asked the Council to consider the obstacles if the landfill is
located in Clay County.
Tommy Robinson, 708 Jalonic Street, stated he has lived on the east side for
40 years. He stated their property will decrease in value. It is also their health
42
Item 10a, cont'd.
and welfare. It is time for some other citizens to share in this. We do not want
your garbage, our garbage, or anyone else's garbage. He asked the Council to go back
and research. Do not try to sell us this unjust thing again.
H. W. Sanders stated the east side site will be on the McClellan ranch. It will
be necessary to move the pipeline if this site is chosen. The 77 Ranch is one of
the show places for a fine ranch. The fact that it adjoins a tract of land adjoining
the dump will lower the value at least 25%. He does not agree that the east side
location is the best location. There is a difference between the 77 Ranch and the
McClellan ranch. The canyon runs into the Wichita River. If the river is polluted
by the run off, we subject ourselves to a very heavy penalty. The east side location
is not the location for the landfill .
Theresa Reynolds , 6744 Southwest Parkway, requested the purchase of an incinerator,
and asked the Council to look into other methods of getting rid of garbage.
Lorna Higginbotham, 4503 Jennings, presented a petition with over 1600 signatures.
She stated it will be less than five miles from a high school , a junior high school , and
an elementary school , and less than one-half mile from a Baptist camp. She urged the
Council to consider all this.
Don Jennings stated he didn't know where to put the landfill . There would be a
problem wherever it is located with uncovered trucks and trash on the roads. It
would be bad to have flats on Seymour Hwy. Also, if the wind blows south to southwest,
it would bring all the garbage from the whole town. Mr. Jennings stated the site
should not be on the west side.
Jim Gile, Hwy. 79, asked what happens when there is a fire if the landfill is
located in Clay County? He also stated it would not make any difference if there is
an alternate route.
Gloria Taylor, 513 Duncan, stated it is not the City trucks that are causing
problems. It is the individual that is hauling -trash.
Herb Tabor, 2502 North Beverly, stated that this decision is a difficult one.
No one wants a landfill site near their home. The issue is not a complex one. It
could be summarized whether a predominantly white City Council will choose to place
the dump site in a black area or a white area. The decision will determine whether
the community will continually place everything unsightly and unsanitary in the black
community. He stated he hoped the Council 's decision would not reflect this attitude.
Ora Little, NAACP, stated there are beautiful homes on the east side and beautiful
schools. This is a black-white thing. She asked the Council to be white in their
decision.
Kenneth Kramer, 4105 Seymour Hwy. , stated he also has property on Amherst. He
is representing Ruth McClellan's one-half interest in the trust. One site will cost
$1 million more than the other. He suggested putting the landfill out in an isolated
area. This would be good for all people. Since there is going to be someone hurt on
either side, go with the most economical site.
Louise Parker stated she had been informed one could dump garbage within 2,000
feet of her front door. She was given the figure of 450,000 tons of furniture 2,000
feet from her front door. It is her home she is talking about.
Reginald Robinson, Jr. , 613 Bonner, stated the Council has to make a decision on
this matter today. He requested the Council not place themselves between the two
entities. That would mean trouble. It would be one more incident that would cause
a long, hot summer. He stated they do not have the financial power to hire attorneys.
There is only one way to react. He asked the Council to find another site, even
if it is further out.
Hazel Burney, Wichita County-Clay County line appeared again. She asked the
Council to think about the children.
The public hearing was closed.
Mayor Hill asked where is the site where no one could have any objections?
1
43
Item 10a, cont'd.
City Manager Gerald Fox stated potential sites have been provided that would
meet the State Department of Health regulations. The sites meet technical and
economical criteria. The economical criteria deteriorates when it is moved further
and further out. We use 100,000 tons of solid waste a year. We are creating our
own problem. We have to solve our own problem. A sanitary landfill has to be
located somewhere. Incinerators are costly. We can bury solid waste. The landfill
is rigidly controlled by state regulations. Fencing, screening, etc. will have to
be followed to operate a sanitary landfill . We intend to enforce the hauling of
trash to and from the landfill according to local and state statutes. We found in
no case did property values deteriorate. We find substantial land development
around sanitary landfills. We have heard objections, but very little alternatives
today.
Mr. Fox stated we have operated two landfills for the past few years. One on
the east side and one on the south side. We are talking about sites five to six
miles outside the city.
Mayor Hill stated he regretted a statement made where one party tried to put
this on racial lines. This is not true. He stated if he was to vote for the
east side site it would be because it is more sparsely settled. It is five miles
out of town. We speak in terms of $1 million. This is a lot of money--5/8 of 1%
of tax money. He stated he does not want this drawn on black and white lines. He
would not do anything deliberately to the black side. He hoped he did not hear any
more about this as long as he was Mayor of Wichita Falls. He stated he wants to do
what is right.
Alderman Hampton stated when he ran for Council he was elected by all the
people at large. He has done his best to represent all of the people of Wichita
Falls. He stated he heard equally good arguments and the same arguments for each
side. If there is a difference of several million dollars for one proposed site
as far as cost, stewardship has to be his main concern.
'RESOLUTION NO. 2529
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF PROPOSED SANITARY LANDFILL
SITE, AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT PROPOSAL BY HENNINGSON,
DURHAM & RICHARDSON TO PROVIDE FURTHER ASSISTANCE IN CONNECTION WITH
SANITARY LANDFILL STUDY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS,
THAT:
SECTION 1 . The City Manager is hereby authorized to direct the Department
of Public Works to proceed with a technical evaluation of Site C to determine if
such site meets State Department of Health requirements.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is further authorized to execute for the City
of Wichita Falls acceptance of the May 7 , 1980, proposal by Henningson, Durham &
Richardson to provide further assistance to the City of Wichita Falls in connection
with the Sanitary Landfill study.
Moved by Alderman Hampton that Resolution No. 2529, selecting Site C, otherwise
known as the Parker Ranch Road site, be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Thomas.
Alderman Traywick stated there has been considerable pressure on the Council
today. Perhaps there is an alternate site. The next nearest site is 162 miles
away from the city. This would increase costs by $40 million.
Alderman Thomas stated he did not believe there was any such place that could
be agreed on. Any place chosen, people would have valid reasons why it shouldn't
be there. Sixty-five percent of the garbage comes from the southwest part of the
city. It comes down to economics rather than other considerations.
Alderman Smith stated the decision has to be based on fact. The facts these
people brought out today are imagined or fabricated. It has been proven it does
not lessen property value. It is not a contest between east against west. What
purpose would it serve to raise taxes to fight legal matters and still end up with
the same site?
44
Item 10a, cont'd.
Alderman Boston stated he has looked at the two sites. With the information
available, everything equals out except economics. It is not a racial matter. He
stated he, too, must decide on the most economical site, as proposed.
Alderman Russell stated the statements made by the Council reflect her opinion.
The faith the Council has in the staff, and faith that is forthcoming from the citizens
of Wichita Falls, in their ability to operate and install a landfill site and abide
to all regulations, will allay a lot of fears. The secret of success will lie in
the way it is run and maintained. That is the goal we are striving for.
The motion carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None ma,
Ernest Lillard, Director of Public Works, stated the opinions expressed will
make him and other staff members much more aware of the feelings of this community.
He hoped to make this an ideal site.
Item 15b, c, d, & e
Bids were opened for the sale of $3.8 million in General Obligation Bonds, and
$1 million in Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. Harold McInroe and John Crew of
First Southwest Company retired to the Council Conference Room to review and verify
the bids, and report back to the Council later in the meeting.
J`Item 11b
Reverend Baxton Bryant, Wesley Methodist Church, appeared regarding extension of
Weeks Street. He asked the City to pay one-half the cost of extending Weeks Street,
the total cost of drainage improvements, and complete construction of Weeks Street
to Jacksboro Hwy.
Bob Mathews, Biggs & Mathews, stated the church would underwrite their part of
the project. The church is requesting Weeks Street be incorporated in the next
assessment paving program.
Alderman Thomas asked if this street has a low priority in the assessment paving
program? Ernest Lillard, Director of Public Works, stated this street does not serve
any houses. It would be just for the traveling public. Houses that front on streets
have a higher priority.
Alderman Thomas stated that normally the developer, in this case the church,
would pay the full cost of Weeks Street bordering their subdivision and all interior
streets; the church would pay the cost of materials to concrete line the drainage
ditch with the City providing the labor and equipment; and the church paying the
full cost of utility extension to and within the subdivision.
Reverend Bryant stated they are not coming as developers.
Moved by Alderman Smith the City go ahead with the proposal as outlined.
Motion seconded by Alderman Traywick.
Alderman Thomas stated he could not vote for this because the next person would
come up and say they want the same as what the church wanted. Mayor Hill stated
this is an unusual situation.
The motion carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Russell , Smith, and Boston
Nays: Aldermen Hampton and Thomas
Item 15b, c, d, & e, cont'd.
- - - - - - - - -
At this time Harold McInroe and John Crew, First Southwest Company, returned with
the bids for the sale of $3.8 million in General Obligation Bonds, and $1 million in
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds.
45
Item 15b, c, d, & e, cont d.
Five bids were received on the General Obligation Bonds , and five bids were
received on the Revenue Bonds. Mr. McInroe stated all bids conformed to the
specifications. He recommended that Republic National Bank of Dallas, Harris
Trust and Savings Bank, First National Bank of Chicago & Associates be awarded
the bid for General Obligation Bonds; and, Dean Witter Reynolds , Inc. , be awarded
the bid for Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds.
Gerald Carlson, Chief Accounting Officer, questioned why the City was not
allowed to cash the earnest money and earn interest on that money? Mr. McInroe
stated the Good Faith check is held until the Purchaser performs his side of the
bargain and then the check is cashed.
ORDINANCE NO. 3667
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3667 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and Boston
Nays: None (Alderman Traywick was out of the room. )
ORDINANCE NO. 3668
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3668 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas , and Boston
Nays: None (Alderman Traywick was out of the room. )
Item 12a
A proposed ordinance was presented increasing the number of Fire Lieutenants
by one.
ORDINANCE NO. 3669
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 15-127 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF FIRE LIEUTENANTS BY
ONE, AND DECREASE NUMBER OF FIRE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS BY ONE.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Ordinance No. 3669 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
Item 13a
A proposed resolution was presented authorizing application to Urban Mass
Transportation Administration for Section 8 planning assistance.
RESOLUTION NO. 2530
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION AND EXECUTING
CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, FOR A GRANT UNDER THE URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ACT
OF 1964, AS AMENDED.
WHEREAS, the Secretary of Transportation is authorized to make grants for
mass transportation projects; and
46
Item 13a
WHEREAS, the contract for financial assistance will impose certain obligations
upon the applicant, including the provision by it of the local share of project
costs; and
WHEREAS, it is required by the U. S. Department of Transportation in accord
with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, that in connection
with the filing of an application for assistance under the Urban Mass Transportation
Act of 1964, as Amended, the applicant give an assurance that it will comply with
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the U. S. Department of Transportation
requirements thereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA
FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1 . The City Manager is authorized to execute and file an application
and execute contractual agreements on behalf of the City of Wichita Falls with the
U. S. Department of Transportation, to aid in the financing of Section 8 Technical
Studies Grant, Federal Catalog Number 20.505.
SECTION 2. The City Manager, Gerald G. Fox, is authorized to execute and file
with such application an assurance or any other document required by the U. S.
Department of Transportation effectuating the purpose of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964.
SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized to furnish such additional information
as the U. S. Department of Transportation may require in connection with the application
or the project.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Resolution No. 2530 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays : None
Item 13b
A proposed resolution was presented establishing private golf cart use fee at
Weeks Park Golf Course.
RESOLUTION NO. 2531
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2212, SETTING FEE FOR USE OF PRIVATE
GOLF CART ON WEEKS PARK GOLF COURSE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1 . The title to Resolution No. 2212 is hereby amended to read as follows :
"Resolution Establishing Fees for Weeks Park Golf Course."
SECTION 2. Resolution No. 2212 is hereby amended by adding to the schedule of
fees therein the following:
"Fee for use of private golf cart, per 18
holes or part thereof. $2.50"
SECTION 3. This resolution shall become effective upon its passage.
Moved by Alderman Smith that Resolution No. 2531 be passed, amending the fee
for use of private golf carts to $2.50.
Motion seconded by Alderman Russell .
City Manager Gerald Fox stated the Council instructed the golfing facilities
to operate on a break-even basis. If the golf cart fee is not raised, the only other
47
Item 13b, cont'd.
source is to raise green fees . Mayor Hill asked what the purpose was in raising
the rates on retired people on a fixed income?
It was pointed out most cities do not allow private golf carts. Alderman
Smith stated the Parks Board had considered not allowing private carts and after
a period of years phasing out private golf carts.
Alderman Hampton stated this cart fee was used to take care of the damage
done to the trails. Mayor Hill disagreed. He then asked what could be done when
six people are playing in a group and two people are standing behind them waiting
to play and the other group will not let them through to play?
Bill Hursh, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated a part-time person is
being considered to monitor this.
The motion carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Russell , Smith, and Boston
Nays: Aldermen Traywick, Thomas, and Hampton
Item 13c
A proposed resolution was presented amending the Weeks Park Golf Pro contract.
/RESOLUTION NO. 2532
RESOLUTION APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH JOE COLLINS,
CONCERNING FEE FOR USE OF PRIVATE GOLF CART AT WEEKS PARK GOLF COURSE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS,
THAT:
That certain First Amendment to Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto,
between the City of Wichita Falls and Joe Collins, concerning the fee for the use
of private golf carts at Weeks Park golf course is hereby approved, and the City
Manager is authorized to execute the same for the City of Wichita Falls.
Moved by Alderman Smith that Resolution No. 2532 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Russell , Smith, and Boston
Nays: Aldermen Traywick, Thomas, and Hampton
Item 14a
A proposed resolution was presented authorizing final payment for fencing
at Rosemont Cemetery and Weeks Park Golf Course.
RESOLUTION NO. 2533
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF
FENCING AT ROSEMONT CEMETERY AND WEEKS PARK GOLF COURSE.
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls and Wichita Ace Fence Co. , Inc. , as contractor,
entered into a contract dated November 5, 1979, wherein said contractor agreed to
construct certain fencing at Rosemont Cemetery and Weeks Park golf course; and,
WHEREAS, the construction of such fencing has been completed in accordance with
the plans and specifications; and,
WHEREAS, the total contract price, based on unit prices and total units
constructed, was $12,934.48, of which $11 ,641 .03 has been paid to the contractor,
leaving a balance due of $1 ,293.45.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA
FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
48
Item 14a, cont'd.
The construction of such fencing is accepted by the City of Wichita Falls, and
the City Manager is directed to pay to the said contractor the balance due as shown
above.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Resolution No. 2533 be approved.
Motion seconded by Alderman Traywick, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes : Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
Item 14b
A proposed resolution was presented authorizing final payment for monument
repair at Rosemont Cemetery.
RESOLUTION NO. 2534
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTING RESETTING OF MONUMENTS
AT ROSEMONT CEMETERY.
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls and C & R Construction & Management Co. ,
as contractor, entered into a contract dated December 12, 1979, wherein said
contractor agreed to reset the monuments at Rosemont Cemetery; and,
WHEREAS, said resetting has been completed in accordance with the plans and
specifications; and,
WHEREAS, the total contract price, based on unit prices and total units reset,
was $55,640.15, of which $49,478.50 has been paid to the contractor, leaving a
balance due of $6,161 .65.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA
FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The resetting of such monuments at Rosemont Cemetery is accepted by the City
of Wichita Falls, and the City Manager is directed to pay to the said contractor
the balance due as shown above.
Moved by Alderman Hampton that Resolution No. 2534 be approved.
Motion seconded by Alderman Thomas, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
Item 14c
A resolution was presented authorizing final payment for construction of
maintenance shop at Kiwanis Park.
RESOLUTION NO. 2535
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF
MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT KIWANIS PARK.
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls and T. A. Litteken & Sons, Inc. , as
contractor, entered into a contract dated December 19, 1979, wherein said contractor
agreed to construct a maintenance building at Kiwanis Park; and,
WHEREAS, said construction has been completed in accordance with the plans
and specifications; and
WHEREAS, the total contract price was $25,084, of which $22,575.60 has been
paid to the contractor, leaving a balance due of $2,508.40.
49
Item 14c, cont'd.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA
FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The construction of the maintenance building at Kiwanis Park is accepted by
the City of Wichita Falls, and the City Manager is directed to pay to the said
contractor the balance due as shown above.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Resolution No. 2535 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays : None
Item 14d
A proposed resolution was presented authorizing final payment for concession-
restroom facilities at Scotland and Williams Parks.
RESOLUTION NO. 2536
RESOLUTION APPROVING PAYMENT FOR AND ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF CONCESSION-
RESTROOM FACILITIES AT SCOTLAND PARK AND WILLIAMS PARK.
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls and F & W Construction Co. , as contractor,
entered into a contract dated January 4, 1980, wherein said contractor agreed to
construct three concession-restroom facilities, one each in Scotland Park, Williams
Park and Loch Lomand Park; the contract price for each such facility was $47,900;
and,
WHEREAS, the construction of the two facilities in Scotland Park and Williams
Park have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, but the
facility in Loch Lomand Park will not be completed for some time; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable to accept from the contractor the construction
of the two completed facilities, and to pay the contract price for them, rather
than waiting for the completion of the entire contract; and,
WHEREAS, the contract price for the two facilities located in Scotland Park
and Williams Park totals $95,800, and the City has heretofore paid the contractor
toward the construction of these two facilities the sum of $74,430, leaving a
balance due of $21 ,370 for these two facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA
FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The construction of the two concession-restroom facilities located at Scotland
Park and Williams Park is accepted by the City of Wichita Falls, and the City
Manager is directed to pay to said contractor the balance due for these two facilities
as shown above.
Bill Hursh, Director of Parks , stated a stall had been constructed too small ;
however, the contractor would correct that at no charge. Also, a lock had been
torn up by vandals and would have to be replaced.
It was suggested the payment to F & W Construction be held until the corrections
are made and then release the payment.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Resolution No. 2536 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Traywick, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Hill , Aldermen Traywick, Hampton, Russell , Smith, Thomas, and
Boston
Nays: None
50
The Board of Aldermen went into executive session to discuss personnel matters.
At this time, Alderman Russell left the meeting. Upon reconvening, the following
action was taken.
Item 15a
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Tim Fambrough be reappointed, and John Hirschi
-' and Wheeler Smith be appointed to the Planning Board for terms to expire May 23, 1983.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried unanimously.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that George Ross and Howard Watson be reappointed
to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals for terms to expire May 23, 1982.
Motion seconded by Alderman Hampton, and carried unanimously.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Joe Moer be appointed, and Mac Lovelace and
Randy Kimbler be reappointed to the Board of Electrical Examiners for terms to
expire May 23, 1982.
Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried unanimously.
Moved by Alderman Thomas that Gene Probst and M. R. Naylor be reappointed
to the Plumbing Advisory Board for terms to expire May 23, 1982.
Motion seconded by Alderman Smith, and carried unanimously.
The Board of Aldermen adjourned at 1 :05 P.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED this �� day of i�/c , t_c.,� 1980.
MAYORP R 0 T E M
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WICHITA
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF WICHITA FALLS AND
JOE COLLINS
This First Amendment to Agreement made and entered into
this the 20th day of May, 1980, by and between the City of
Wichita Falls and Joe Collins,
WITNESSETH:
The parties hereto do hereby mutually agree to amend
their agreement dated April 1, 1980, as follows :
Section 8 of such agreement is hereby amended to read
as follows:
"8 . Any private golf cart used on the course will conform
to Parks Department requirements as to tire size and type,
horsepower, gear ratio, speed and muffler. The use of private
carts on the course will be charged a fee established by the
Board of Aldermen, of which fee City will receive 2/3 and
the Professional will receive 1/3. "
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
instrument as of the day and year set out above.
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS
BY:
Gerald G. Fox, City Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Joe Collins, Professional