Min 01/04/1983 47
Wichita Falls , Texas
Memorial Auditorium Building
January 4, 1983
Items 1 & 2
The Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, met in regular
session on the above date in the Council Room of the Memorial Auditorium
Building at 8:30 o'clock A.M. , with the following members present.
Gary D. Cook Mayor
Gene Shearman
Carol G. Russell
Craig A. Wilson Aldermen
Howard M. Morris
Horace 0. Boston
John W. Hampton Absent
Dane J. Bennett Acting City Manager
H. P. Hodge, Jr. City Attorney
Wilma J. Thomas City Clerk
Fred Werner Chief Accounting Officer
The invocation was given by James L. Heckathorn, First Church of the
Nazarene.
Item 3
Moved by Alderman Morris that minutes of the meeting held December 21 , 1982,
be approved.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, and carried unanimously.
Item 4a - 8a
Moved by Alderman Wilson that Items 4a - 8a on the Consent Agenda, be
approved.
Motion seconded by Alderman Morris.
Item 4a
A proposed ordinance was presented appropriating $11 ,523.00 to purchase a
Fire Department pumper.
Alderman Russell inquired if there has been any thought of changing the red
color to yellow as we add equipment to the inventory? Acting Fire Chief Jameson
stated that the department has one yellow piece of equipment, and they have not
noticed any significant evidence that that color is better than red. If they
change them, they will need to change all of them at once. He stated that there
are studies all over the country, and there is no evidence that any color is
better than red. Dallas has recently changed all their equipment to white.
ORDINANCE NO. 1-83
AN ORDINANCE MAKING AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE GENERAL EQUITY FUND TO
ACCOUNT NUMBERS LISTED BELOW, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris , and Boston
Nays: None
Item 4b
ORDINANCE NO. 2-83
ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS, AND
PROVIDING AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR THE HANDLING OF COMPLAINTS
CONCERNING SUCH DISCRIMINATION.
48
Item 4b, cont'd.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 4c
ORDINANCE NO. 3-83
ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
(SECTIONS 13-11 THROUGH 13-27) , WHICH PROHIBITS DISCRIMINATORY HOUSING
PRACTICES, AND PROVIDES AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR THE HANDLING
OF COMPLAINTS CONCERNING SUCH PRACTICES.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 4d
ORDINANCE NO. 4-83
ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, AND
PROVIDING AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR THE HANDLING OF COMPLAINTS
CONCERNING SUCH PRACTICES.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 5a
RESOLUTION NO. 1-83
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR THEIR PROVIDING
FUNDS FOR THE SALARY OF ONE SANITARIAN II .
THAT:BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS,
Certain contract, a copy of which is attached hereto, between the City of
Wichita Falls and the Texas Department of Health, whereby such Department shall
provide funds for the salary (which shall not include fringe benefits) of one
Sanitarian II is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute
the same for the City of Wichita Falls.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 5b
RESOLUTION NO. 2-83
RESOLUTION CONTINUING CITY-COUNTY HEALTH UNIT FOR TWO YEARS.
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls by enacting
Resolution No. 437 on December 23, 1960, adopted the terms of Article 4436a-1
of Revised Civil Statutes of Texas and thereby ratified the continued joint
operation of the Wichita Falls City-County Health Unit; and,
WHEREAS, by the terms of Section 6 of said Article 4436a-1 , at the end of
every two year period of operation, said respective governmental bodies shall
determine, by resolution, whether said unit shall be continued as a City-County
Health Unit or shall be operated separately as now provided by law; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, does
desire to continue the operation of said unit as a City-County Health Unit for
another two year period.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
49
Item 5b, cont'd.
The Wichita Falls City-County Health Unit shall be continued as a City-
County Health Unit under Article 4436a-1 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas
for the two year period from January 1 , 1983, through December 31 , 1984.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 5c
RESOLUTION NO. 3-83
r
RESOLUTION APPOINTING GARLAND R. DEAN, M.D. , TO THE WICHITA FALLS
CITY-COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH.
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls by enacting
Resolution No. 437 on December 23, 1960, adopted the terms of Article 4436a-1
of Revised Civil Statutes of Texas and thereby established a joint City-County
Board of Health; and,
WHEREAS, by the terms of Section 2 of said Article 4436a-1 , the appointment
of members to the seven member City-County Board of Health shall be by joint
action of the Wichita Falls Board of Aldermen and the Wichita County
Commissioners Court; and,
WHEREAS, Dr. Garland R. Dean' s first two-year term on the City-County
Board of Health expires December 31 , 1982; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls desires to
make an appointment of a member to fill the vacancy on the City-County Board of
Health, subject to ratification of said appointment by the Wichita County
Commissioners Court.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
Garland R. Dean, M.D. is hereby appointed a member of the Wichita Falls
City-Council Board of Health for a term of two years, commencing January 1 , 1983,
provided said appointment is duly ratified by the Wichita Falls Commissioners
Court.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 5d
RESOLUTION NO. 4-83.
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING APPOINTMENT BY COMMISSIONERS COURT OF TED C.
ALEXANDER, JR. , D.O. AND MICKEY CORNELIUS TO THE WICHITA FALLS
CITY-WICHITA COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH.
WHEREAS, the Commissioners Court of Wichita County, Texas has appointed
Ted C. Alexander, Jr. , D.O. and Mickey Cornelius as members of the Wichita Falls
City-Wichita County Board of Health for two year terms commencing January 1 , 1983
and expiring December 31 , 1984.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The appointments by the Commissioners Court of Wichita County, Texas of
Ted C. Alexander, Jr. , D.O. and Mickey Cornelius as members of such Board of
Health for terms expiring December 31 , 1984 are hereby confirmed.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 5e
RESOLUTION NO. 5-83
RESOLUTION APPROVING LEASE OF FIRE TRUCK TO LAKE ARROWHEAD
VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT.
50
Item 5e, cont'd.
WHEREAS, Lake Arrowhead Volunteer Fire Department, a non-profit corporation
which provides fire protection and prevention for area residents at Lake
Arrowhead, is in need of a fire truck; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls owns a fire truck consisting of a
government surplus one-ton pickup truck on which is mounted a portable pump
and water tank; and,
WHEREAS, this fire truck is not presently needed by the City of Wichita
Falls, and the Lake Arrowhead Volunteer Fire Department is willing to fight
fires on City-owned property at Lake Arrowhead, if City will lease them this
fire truck for $1 .00 per year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
That certain lease agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, between
the City of Wichita Falls and Lake Arrowhead Volunteer Fire Department, for
the lease of a fire truck, is hereby approved, and the City Manager is
authorized to execute the same for the City of Wichita Falls.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 5f
RESOLUTION NO. 6-83
RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR JET-SKI RENTAL AT LAKE WICHITA.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS,
THAT:
That certain license agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, between
the City and Bob Schuchman and C. L. Lakey, authorizing them to operate a jet-ski
rental at Lake Wichita, is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized
to execute the same for the City of Wichita Falls.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 5g
RESOLUTION NO. 7-83
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN.D AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS CONCERNING CAPITAL ASSISTANCE
FUNDING OF TRANSIT FACILITIES.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS,
THAT:
That certain contract, a copy of which is attached hereto, between the City
of Wichita Falls and the State of Texas acting by and through the State
Department of Highways and Public Transportation, is hereby approved and the
City Manager is authorized to execute the same for the City of Wichita Falls.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 6a
The bid for one ten-cubic yard dump body for Public Utilities was awarded
to Longhorn Trailer Company, in the amount of $5,997.00, as the lowest, most
responsible bidder.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
51
Item 6b
The bid for selected IBM equipment, as listed, was awarded to Roselius
Computer Corporation in the amount of $18,185.36.
One 3274 Control Unit, seven 3278 Display Stations,
six 3279 Display Stations, two 3287 Printers, and three 4633 Keyboards.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
i
Item 7a
Authority was granted to advertise for bids for a mobile asphalt patching
machine.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
i
Item 8a
Minutes of the meeting of the Park Board held December 9, 1982, were
received.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 9a
Bobby D. Bohanon, an employee of the Police Department, was honored as
Employee of the Month for January. Mayor Cook presented him with a plaque and
two tickets each to a theatre and dinner.
Item l0a
A proposed ordinance was presented creating a Mechanical Code Board of
Adjustments and Appeals.
ORDINANCE NO. 5-83
ORDINANCE CREATING A MECHANICAL CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS.
Moved by Alderman Morris that Ordinance No. 5-83 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item Ila
A proposed resolution was presented extending the suspension of Lone Star
Gas Company' s rate increase request for an additional 30 days.
RESOLUTION N0. 8-83
RESOLUTION EXTENDING FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTY DAYS THE SUSPENSION OF
THE OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULES FILED BY LONE STAR GAS
COMPANY.
WHEREAS, Lone Star Gas Company did, on August 11 1982 file a schedule of
P y 9 >
rates for gas service within the City of Wichita Falls, to become effective
September 16, 1982; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 151-82, the Board of Aldermen suspended the
operation of such proposed rate schedules for a period of 120 days from and
after September 16, 1982 for further study, investigation, presentation of
evidence and public hearings; and,
i
52
Item lla, cont'd.
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen finds that a longer time will be required
for a final determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The suspension of the operation of the proposed rate schedules filed by
Lone Star Gas Company on August 11 , 1982, is hereby extended for the period of
an additional thirty days, for further study, investigation, presentation of
evidence and public hearings.
Moved by Alderman Shearman that Resolution No. 8-83 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
A work session with the consultant was scheduled for Tuesday, January 11 ,
1983, at 8:30 A.M.
Item llb
A proposed resolution was presented authorizing an amendment to the grant
for construction of a transit facility.
RESOLUTION NO. 9-83
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL
ASSISTANCE GRANT TX-05-0075, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TRANSIT FACILITY.
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls has entered into a grant agreement with
the United States Department of Transportation for the purpose of constructing
a Central Services Complex which includes a bus maintenance facility; and,
WHEREAS, certain changes have occurred in the design of the facility and
in the estimated project budget; and,
WHEREAS, the citizens have voted approval of a $2,500,000 bond issue for
construction of a central maintenance complex.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS:
That the City Manager is authorized to execute and file an amendment on
behalf of the City of Wichita Falls with the U.S. Department of Transportation
in regard to project number TX-05-0075 relating to the financing of capital
improvements, transit facility construction and equipment, to the transit system.
That the City will provide labor and materials toward the local share of
the funding; the Board of Aldermen will appropriate funds as necessary to ensure
the full amount of local share.
That the City Manager is authorized to reaffirm any assurances provided
to the U.S. Department of Transportation already provided in the original grant
application and as authorized in Resolution Number 2711 passed and approved on
the 6th day of January, 1981 .
That Dane J. Bennett, Acting City Manager, is authorized to furnish such
additional information as the U.S. Department of Transportation may require in
connection with the application, this amendment, or the project.
That the City Manager is authorized to execute amendments to the grant
contract agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation for aid in
financing this capital improvement project.
53
Item llb, cont'd.
That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which
this resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law and that
public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required.
j Moved by Alderman Boston that Resolution No. 9-83 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Russell , and carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 12a
The bid for a 1000 G.P.M. triple combination fire apparatus was recommended
to Sutphen Corporation, Amlin, Ohio, in the amount of $96,523. Mayor Cook asked
j if the bond were included, and Dane Bennett stated that it was.
Moved by Alderman Wilson that the bid be awarded, as recommended.
Motion seconded by Alderman Morris.
Alderman Russell confirmed that we have not purchased equipment from this
company before. She asked if the City feels comfortable with this? Acting Fire
Chief Jim Jameson stated that he checked with other cities. Fort Worth just
bought two new ones. They have been building equipment since 1887.
The motion was carried by the following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 13a was deleted from the agenda.
Item 14a
Permission was requested to advertise for bids for construction of the
Central Services Complex.
Moved by Alderman Shearman that authority be granted to advertise for bids,
as requested.
Motion seconded by Alderman Morris, and carried unanimously.
Item 15a
A proposed ordinance was presented granting a waiver of sidewalk requirements
to the owner of A.V. Mote's Garage on Eastside Drive.
ORDINANCE NO. 6-83
ORDINANCE GRANTING WAIVER OF SECTION 27-29 (a) AND (c) OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES TO ALLOW THE OWNER OF A.V. MOTE'S GARAGE TO DELAY
CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK UNTIL SUCH TIME AS PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
WARRANTS ITS CONSTRUCTION.
Moved by Alderman Shearman, for discussion purposes, that Ordinance No. 6-83
be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boston, for the same reason.
Alderman Shearman asked Randy Brown, Acting Director of Public Works, what
the ordinance is on this? Mr. Brown explained that we have two ordinances
dealing with this. One pertains to residential , and one to industrial . There
is no waiver for industrial except under certain circumstances. It has been
their policy that if it is physically impossible to install because of terrain,
then it may be waived. They have also waived it if there is no curb and gutter.
54
Item 15a, cont'd.
If there is no curb and gutter they try to get people to postpone it until curb
and gutter is installed. Sometimes there has been a lack of communication between
the Public Works Department, and the Inspection Department. They are trying to
correct these procedures, and try to be fair with it.
Mayor Cook asked if there are no adjacent sidewalks in this area? Mr. Brown
stated that there are none. He further stated that they had the same situation
with K-Mart on Loop 11 . If we don' t start somewhere, the next person wants the
same variance, and there will not be any sidewalks installed. In this case, he
does not see that it gives him the authority to waive it. If you want to continue
with the sidewalk program, we either need to enforce it or amend it.
Alderman Wilson asked what we need to do to have a fair mechanism? Mr.
Brown stated that he does not feel that it is the ordinance, but whether we
want to continue with the sidewalk policy. If we want to deem certain areas as
non-pedestrian, that is getting into a complicated situation with the Planning
Department. They cannot come up with simple solutions to these problems. The
way the ordinance reads, the need is felt for sidewalks in the City, and they
felt like a commercial business going in could surely afford the sidewalk. A
waiver has been given on residential , but not on commercial .
City Attorney H.P. Hodge stated that the question of sidewalks has been
plaguing the Council for a long time. Some members of the Board of Aldermen
felt that sidewalks should be everywhere, and some felt they were not needed,
so they were continually changing it. It has been more stable since we have
this ordinance than it has ever been before.
Mayor Cook stated that he has a problem determining at what time pedestrian
traffic warrants its construction. Mr. Brown agreed. If there are no people
walking down the sidewalk, they are not needed. On the other hand, if there
are no sidewalks, then people can't walk down them.
Mayor Cook asked if there are any cities that have tried a certain percentage
of development, such as 50 percent, in determining sidewalks? On the other
hand he sees it more difficult to determine other than a percentage of develop-
ment in a given area. Mr. Brown stated that they have not looked at it. Here
it would be simple to install the sidewalks. He cannot come up with a situation
that will not cause them problems. He has asked Mr. McKinney for his help, and
they have come up with a loss.
Mayor Cook and Alderman Shearman noted that the reason for sidewalks in the
City View area was because of the school .
Alderman Russell asked about traffic counts in this area of Eastside Drive,
and what is the speed limit in that area? Mr. Brown stated that it is 45 miles
per hour. Alderman Russell noted that a safety factor might become an issue in
considering it. Alderman Wilson agreed that that, and the proximity of residences
in that area should be considered. It is across from Central Freight on Eastside
Drive and there are very few residences there.
Acting City Manager Dane Bennett stated that $5000 for sidewalks would
strain these people a lot. He stated that even five years from now if an
agreement were put in the ordinance, that might help to determine when traffic
warrants its construction. He stated that there are no sidewalks there, but
he realizes there never will be unless they start somewhere. He stated that
the sidewalk was not a part of their original planning in construction of the
building.
Alderman Russell asked Mr. Mote about his plans to build a truck servicing
facility. Mr. Mote stated that the building is 97 percent completed. Mr. Mote
stated that he purchased this property from R. W. Mathews. There has been no
development on this property since 1925. It is a blighted area. The entrance
ways have already been installed. If we come in now and cut down six inches
for sidewalk, we will have dirt six inches high on both sides of the sidewalk.
He stated that he has had great cooperation with the City Inspection Department.
He has counted five people in three months walking along there. There is no
school or no children there. He stated that he was notified of sidewalks by
the City Engineering Department as he was doing the entrance work, when they
came out and staked the drive approaches. The building was 85 percent complete
at that time. He stated that most people get around the sidewalks by platting
in separate lots. He stated that he will put in the sidewalk if that is what
55
Item 15a, cont'd.
the Council wants, but he feels it is a total waste. If he puts in 541 feet of
sidewalk, that will be more than the total amount of sidewalk on the whole of
Eastside Drive from Seventh Street. He stated that he talked to an appraiser
and he stated that a sidewalk in that area would appreciate for nothing.
Alderman Wilson stated that he feels it is important that we be consistent
in our ordinances.
Moved by Alderman Morris that the proposed ordinance be amended at the end
of Section 1 , as follows: "and/or at the time of adjacent construction".
Moved by Alderman Shearman that Section 2 of the proposed ordinance be
amended, as follows: If "in time" the Board of Aldermen - - - -.
Motion seconded by Alderman Morris, and carried unanimously.
The motion for passage of amended Ordinance No. 6-83 was carried by the
following vote.
Ayes: Mayor Cook, Aldermen Shearman, Russell , Wilson, Morris, and Boston
Nays: None
Item 15b
Mayor Cook asked if anyone desired to address the Board of Aldermen on
other business, stating that they would not be able to take any action, but can
only listen.
Randolph Duke appeared as owner of Gold Cross ambulance. He stated that
a month ago today he complied with all requirements of operating an ambulance.
He turned in his paperwork to Mrs. Thomas, City Clerk. He stated that last
night was the first thing he had heard. He stated that City Attorney H. P. Hodge
notified him last night that he could operate an invalid coach. This is not
what he requested. He requested operation in the city as a non-emergency.
There is no money in an invalid coach. He wants to know now what he can do next?
City Attorney H. P. Hodge stated that the City ordinances provide for this
type of service. One is emergency, and one is invalid transfer, or non-emergency.
Nobody has an exclusive franchise to operate ambulances in Wichita Falls.
Everyone is free to operate under one or the other. Mr. Duke applied under
non-emergency, which would only fit under the invalid transfer ordinance. He
applied several months ago for a waiver or a change in the ordinance about
prohibition of a fee. At that time he had not made an application to operate
under anything. He has now made his application, and it fits under the invalid
transfer ordinance. For all practical purposes he has complied with this, but
he cannot charge for it. He asks where he can go from here. Mr. Hodge stated
that he could not advise him on this. He does not know what he wants to do.
Mr. Duke stated that we have two conflicting ordinances. The contractor
is doing what he says he cannot do. The contractor is making invalid coach
runs, and is charging for it. He is also receiving a sizeable subsidy. He
stated that he is asking for the right of an independent businessman to do a
legitimate business in the city. He is not asking for a subsidy.
Mayor Cook asked if the two ordinances conflict?
Mr. Duke stated that in order to operate as an invalid coach, he has to
work for a nursing home. He has the identical equipment on his ambulances as
does the contractor, which is required by the State and City. He is still
stymied in that he can operate in the city, but he cannot charge for it.
Alderman Wilson suggested that we look at the two ordinances for possible
amendments to permit the man to operate.
Mayor Cook noted that Plumlee stated that the cost of emergency service
placed a greater cost on them. Mayor Cook asked Mr. Duke if he sees that this
would place a burden on his operation to operate an emergency service? Mr. Duke
agreed that emergency service is more costly. He stated that he is in the
transfer business only. He further stated that he can handle his collection
rates. He is like Rio Airways and Trailways--if you don' t pay, you don' t ride.
56
Item 15b, cont'd.
Mayor Cook and Alderman Morris asked the staff to look at these ordinances
to see what can be done.
City Attorney H. P. Hodge pointed out that Mr. Duke had the right to apply
for the same type of permit that Plumlee did, and if a Certificate of Convenience
and Necessity had been issued, he could have operated right along beside Plumlee
but he did not see fit to apply that way.
Mr. Duke stated that he had changed his name to Med-Tran. He stated that
the ordinance is bad. It was written for doctors and to eliminate competition.
City Attorney H. P. Hodge stated that he had to challenge Mr. Duke' s
statement that it was written to eliminate competition. It was not written to
eliminate competition at all . It was to promote a particular type of industry
which was essential to the community, and to promote it in a way to have a
healthy industry. It was not to stifle competition, but to foster a healthy
industry.
Alderman Wilson commented that we either need an ordinance to grant an
exclusive franchise, or give the man an opportunity to charge for the service
if we are going to operate in a non-emergency service.
City Attorney H. P. Hodge mentioned the analogy with the airline industry
and trucking industry. Congress decided that airlines did not need to be
regulated. You might want to decide that ambulances do not need to be
regulated. It is doing what is best for the community, and not to stifle
competition.
Alderman Shearman mentioned competition in his business, and how the
customer gets a better shake because of it. Mr. Hodge commented that there
are some distinctions between the two types of businesses.
Mayor Cook stated that he drove an ambulance for five years in a city
about the size of Wichita Falls, while he was going to college. There were
two companies, and both of them suffered, as well as the community. We do
need to look at the ordinance to see that there are no conflicts, and
try to make them more concise.
Alderman Shearman requested a work session on this. As soon as Mr. Hodge
can put the information together, Mayor Cook will call a work session to
discuss it.
Items 15c, d
The Board of Aldermen recessed at 9:55 A.M. for executive session pursuant
to Article 6252-17, paragraph (g) of the Revised Texas Civil Statutes. The
Board reconvened at 12:15 P.M.
Moved by Alderman Boston that the following be appointed to the Design
Review Commission, for terms as indicated.
a. Gayla Morris - reappointed from January 4, 1983 through December 31 , 1984
b. Larry Garner - appointed (replacing John Hirschi ) from January 4, 1983
through December 31 , 1984
Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously.
Moved by Alderman Boston that the following be appointed to the Human
Relations Commission, for terms as indicated.
a. James Montgomery - reappointed from January 4, 1983 through
December 31 , 1985
b. Barbara Oldham - reappointed from January 4, 1983 through
December 31 , 1985
c. Ray Hickman - reappointed from January 4, 1983 through December 31 , 1983
d. Jerry Fisher - reappointed from January 4, 1983 through
December 31 , 1985
e. Charlye 0. Farris - reappointed from January 4, 1983 through
December 31 , 1985
f. Louis Esquibel - reappointed from January 4, 1983 through
December 31 , 1985
g. Dr. Om Prakash - appointed (replacing Mrs. Huff) from January 4, 1983
through December 31 , 1985
57
Y
Items 15c, d, cont'd.
Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously.
Moved by Alderman Boston that the following be appointed to the Traffic
Commission, for terms as indicated.
a. Jim Miles - reappointed January 1 , 1983 through December 31 , 1985
b. Vernon Beck - reappointed January 1 , 1983 through December 31 , 1985
c. Howard Allison - appointed January 1 , 1983 through December 31 , 1985
d. Don James - appointed January 1 , 1983 through December 31 , 1985
e. Harvey Boyd - appointed January 1 , 1983 through December 31 , 1983
(replacing Ken Wampler)
Motion seconded by Alderman Shearman, and carried unanimously.
- - — — — — — — — —
The Board of Aldermen adjourned at 12:20 P.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1983.
Horace-O. Boston,, Mayor Pro tem
ATTEST:
r
YJ--eZ "
41'� k
Wilma J. Tho as, City
STATE OF TEXAS C O N T R A C T
COUNTY OF TRAVIS Standard for Several Items
This One Would Be For One Salary
The Texas Department of Health, hereinafter referred to as
RECEIVING AGENCY acting through its Deputy Commissioner for Management
and Administration and City of Wichita Falls
Name of PERFORMING AGENC
a(n) City
Type of Organization
(designate individual, corporation, partnership , non-profit organization,
city, county, council of government, special purpose district, etc. ) ,
hereinafter referred to as PERFORMING AGENCY, acting through
Dane Bennett , its City Manager
(Name of Person Authorized to Sign Contracts) (Title of Person
mutually agree as follows :
Authorized to SignContracts)
ARTICLE 1. Scope of Work Add Sanitarian II to staff of Wichita Falls City-Wichita.
County Health Department. Position is needed due to a 314d loss of Sanitarian I. Duties
will include handling of complaints and conducting inspections and will enhance performanc(
of Environmental Health Section by expanding services in the following programs:
1) School Inspection Program; 2) Day Care Facilities Inspection Program; 3) Hotel/Motel
Inspection Program; 4) Solid Waste Program.
ARTICLE 2 . Terms
The term of this contract shall be from February 1 , 3 through
3LUtember 30 1983 No commitments e contract funds per-
mittec� prior. to t e first day of the contract term nor subsequent to the
last day of the contract term.
Next year would be October 1, 1983 - Sep�em})er 30. 1»4
ARTICLE 3. Applicable Laws and Standards
The RECEIVING AGENCY will comply with the requirements set forth in
Sections 1905 (d) , Public Health Services Act , and Section 1742 (a)
and (b) , Chapter 2 , Title XVII of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of
1981, and. with Department of Health and Human Services 45 CFR Parts 16 ,
74, and 96 , Block Grant Programs .
This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas .
]he PERFORMING AGENCY agrees that the Uniform Grant and Contract Manage-
ment Standards , Article 4413 , Section 32g, V.A.C . S . , issued by the
Governor' s budget and Planning office will apply as terms and conditions
of this contract , and the standards are adoptedd, by reference in their
cntirety. If there is a conflict between the provisions of this Contract
and the Uniform Grant and Contract Management Standards , the provision of
tb,- Uniform Grant and Contract Management Standards will prevail unless
expressly stated otherwise . A copy of this Manual and its references are
provided to you by the Texas Department of Health.
ARTICLE 4. Compensation and Payment
For services satisfactorily performed pursuant to the Scope of Work,
the PERFORMING AGENCY shall be reimbursed by the RECEIVING AGENCY a
total amount not to exceed $ 18.768 aDprox. Allowable reimbursable costs
shall be only as outlined in t e Bu get , which is hereby made a part
of this Agreement as Attachment 1.
The PERFORMING AGENCY will not bill the RECEIVING AGENCY for any costs
under this Contract which have also been billed or should have been
billed to any other funding source.
i
.�
Costs claimed for reimbursement must be substantiated. 11 equipment
is to be purchased, purchasing will be made through the State purchasing
procedures .
The PERFORMING AGENCY shall submit certified vouchers for reimbursement
according to the procedures set out in Attachment At the close of
each quarter_ , a signed expenditure report , the format of which is in the
UGCMS, must be submitted. The voucher and expenditure report shall reflect
the total allowable costs incurred and revenue received during the
preceding period. All revenues received from the delivery of contract
services shall also be identified.
ARTICLE 5 . Funding
This Contract is contingent upon Federal funding being available for
the term in question and PERFORMING AGENCY shall have no right of action
against the RECEIVING AGENCY in the event that the RECEIVING AGENCY is
tuiable to perform its obligations under this Contract as a result of
the suspension , termination, withdrawal or failure of funding to the
RECEIVING AGENCY or lack of sufficient funding of the RECEIVING AGENCY
for this Contract . If such funds become unavailable , or if the total
amount of: funds allocated for this Contract should become depleted
during any Contract Budget Period, and the RECEIVING AGENCY is unable
to obtain additional funds for such purposes , then this Contract will
be terminated.
The PERFORMING AGENCY will use such funds that become available and
that are allocated to them for the purpose of supplementing the
PERFORMING AGENCY' S budget . These funds will in no event supplant
such State , local , and other non-Federal funds . The PERFORMING
AGENCY will increase the public health activities in its jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 6. Grant-Related Income
All. grant-related income shall be retained by the PERFORMING AGENCY
and: I) beused by the PERFORMING AGENCY for any purposes which further
the objectives of legislation under which the Contract was made , and/or
2) be deducted from total project costs , according to the departmental
policy interpreting UGCMS , a copy of which is included in the UGCMS
Manual.
ARTICLE 7 . Records
The PERFORMING AGENCY will have a system in effect to protect from
inappropriate disclosure patient records maintained by them in connection
with the activities funded under this Contract.
ARTICLE 8. Reports and Inspections
PERFORMING AGENCY shall make financial, program, progress , and other
reports as requested. by RECEIVING AGENCY in the format agreed to by
the parties hereto, and will arrange for on-site inspections by
RECEIVING AGENCY. PERFORMING AGENCY shall participate fully in any
required evaluation study of this program.
ARTICLE 9 . Audit of Records
PERFORMING AGENCY agrees that RECEIVING AGENCY, DHHS , the Comptroller
General of the United States , or any of their duly authorized representa-
tives , shall have access to any pertinent books , documents , papers, and
records of PERFORMING AGENCY for the purpose of making audit, examination
excerpts , and transcripts of transactions related to the Contract.
RECEIVING AGENCY shall have the right to audit billings both before
and after payment; payment under this Contract shall not foreclose the
right of RECEIVING AGENCY to recover excessive or illegal payments .
Financial records , supporting documents , statistical records , and all
other pertinent records shall be retained for a period of three (3)
years after the date expenditures are reported under the Contract .
If audit by or on behalf of the Federal government has begun but is
not completed at the end of the three-year period , or if audit findings
have not been resolved at the end of the three-year period , the records
shall be retained until resolution of the audit findings .
ARTICLE 10. Amendment
RECEIVING AGENCY will submit a revised budget to PERFORMING AGENCY,
either hicreasing or decreasing the amount of funds allocated at such
times that additional funds become available or at such times that funds
must he withdrawn. The original budget and revisions thereto become a
hart of lh.i :, Contl"acL and are st.ihj(.,ct: to all of the terms and conditions
of this Cont-tact .
This Contract shall not be altered, changed , or amended except by
i-nstrument in writing executed by authorized officials of the parties
hereto as set forth below:
FOR RECEIVING AGENCY: --
(and/or) ---- — — _ --- _ — — ---FOR PERFORMING AGENCY: —
(and/or) —_ -. --- - - - -
ARTIC(,E ___ll . ___E'roperty and Supplies
Title to all property furnished by RECEIVING AGENCY shall remain with
RECEIVING AGENCY.
Title to RECEIVING AGENCY property shall not be affected or lose its
identity by reason of affixation to any realty or attachment at law.
PERFORMING AGENCY shall maintain a property and supplies inventory and
administer a program of maintenance , repair , and protection of RECEIVING
AGENCY assets so as to assure its full availability and usefulness for
performance under this Contract .
In the event PERFORMING AGENCY is indemnified, reimbursed, or otherwise
compensated for any loss of destruction of, or damage to, RECEIVING AGENCY
assets during the period of this Contract , it shall use the proceeds to
repair or replace the RECEIVING AGENCY assets .
Upon termination of the relationship of the parties , the PERFORMING AGENCY
shall return all property and unused supplies to RECEIVING AGENCY in good
order.
ARTICLE 12. Discrimination Prohibited
No person in the United States shall on the grounds of race , creed,
color , handicap, age, ability to pay , sex or national origin, be
excluded from participation in, be denied the proceeds of, or be
subject to discrimination in the performance of this Contract. The
PARTIES will comply with the regulations promulgated by the Secretary
of DHHS , with the approval of the President of the United States ,
pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (45 CFR Part 80) .
In addition, PERFORMING AGENCY shall comply with the provisions of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 , Public Law 93-112, Section 504,
which insures that no individual shall, solely by reason of handicap,
be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or
be subject to discrimination in this program. "
ARTICLE 13. Equal Employment Opportunity
During the performance of this Contract , PERFORMING AGENCY shall not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because
of race, color, age, religion, sex, national origin or handicap.
PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to post in conspicuous places , available to
employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the
provisions of this clause. All solicitations or advertisements for
employees placed by or on behalf of PERFORMING AGENCY shall state
that all qualified applicants will receive consideration without
regard to race, color, age, religion, sex or national origin.
PERFORMING AGENCY shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order
11246, dated September 24, 1965, and all relevant rules , regulations ,
and orders of the Secretary of Labor.
ARTICLE 14. Political Activity
None of the funds , materials , property or services contributed by
the PARTIES under this Contract shall be used in the performance
of this Contract for any partisan political activity, or to further
the election or defeat of any candidate for public office. In
addition, none of the funds reimbursed under this Contract shall
be used to pay the salary or the expenses of anyone engaged in any
activity designed to influence legislation or appropriation pending
before Congress .
ARTICLE 15. Clean Air and Water Acts
PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to comply with all applicable standards ,
orders , and regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970
(42 USC 1857 et seq. ) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(33 USC 1251 et seq. ) as amended.
ARTICLE 16. Energy Efficiency
PERFORMING AGENCY agrees to recognize mandatory standards and policies
relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the State energy
conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (Public Law 94-165) .
EXECUTED THIS THE DAY OF 19
PERFORMING AGENCY: RECEIVING AGENCY:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
BY
Name of PERFORMING AGENCY Hermas L. Miller
Deputy Commissioner for
Management and Administration
By — Approved:
By
Title C. C. Eaves , M. D.
Associate Commissioner for
Community & Rural Health
Approved as to form:
By
Office of Genera Counse
Texas Department of Health
FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The following prescribes uniform reporting procedures for PERFORMING
AGENCY to:
1. Summarize expenditures and unexpended funds for
each Contract ;
2. report the status of approved cash advance ;
3. request advances and reimbursements ; and
4. promulgate standard forms incident thereto.
Cost Reimbursement Method:
Monthly, or as needed
PERFORMING AGENCY shall submit a State of Texas Purchase Voucher
(TDH Form #AG-37 , exhibit attached) and a Request for Advance or
Reimbursement (TDH Form #GC-10) .
Quarterly
PERFORMING AGENCY shall submit a Financial Status Report State
Supplemental Form 269a (TDH Form #GC-4) by the 20th of the
month following a quarter. If no previous request for funds
has been received, a Request for Advance or Reimbursement and
a State of Texas Purchase Voucher shall be submitted.
Annual/Final
PERFORMING AGENCY shall submit a Request for Advance or
Reimbursement ; a Financial Status Report State Supplemental
Form 269a; and, if necessary, a State of Texas Purchase Voucher
if all costs have not been reimbursed, or a refund of excess
monies if costs incurred were less than funds received.
Advance Method:
PERFORMING AGENCY may request an advance at the beginning of the Contract
period. Amount of the advance will be determined by the amount and
length of the period. Amount of the advance will be liquidated in the
final months of the Contract, so that after the Final Billing, the
PERFORMING AGENCY will not have excess advance funds on hand.
Monthly
PERFORMING AGENCY shall submit a State of Texas Purchase Voucher
(TDH Form #AG-37 , exhibit attached) for each month of the Contract
in an amount as determined above. The State of Texas Purchase
Voucher may be submitted on a monthly basis or sufficient number
of vouchers to cover the Contract period may be submitted when
Contract signatures are obtained. -
Quarterly
PERFORMING AGENCY shall submit a Financial Status Report State
Supplemental Form 269a (TDH Form #GC-4) and a Request for Advance
or Reimbursement (TDH Form #GC-10) by the 20th of the month
following a quarter.
Annual/Final
PERFORMING AGENCY shall submit a Request for Advance or Reimburse-
ment ; a Financial Status Report State Supplemental Form 269a; and,
if necessary, a State of Texas Purchase Voucher if all costs have
not been reimbursed, or a refund of excess monies if costs incurred
were less than funds received.
This agreement made and entered into this the day of
January, 1983, by and between the City of Wichita Falls , Texas ,
a municipal corporation, acting through its City Manager, herein-
after called City, and the Lake Arrowhead Volunteer Fire Department,
a non-profit corporation, hereinafter called Department,
WITNESSETH:
For and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein
contained, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows :
1 . City hereby leases to Department a certain fire truck
consisting of a government surplus one-ton pickup truck on which
is mounted a portable pump and water tank .
2 . Department agrees to pay to City as rental for such truck
the sum of One Dollar per year, payable at the beginning of each
lease year; in addition, Department agrees that, so long as this
lease is in effect, they will respond to and fight all fires
which occur on property owned by City at Lake Arrowhead, which is
located in Clay and Archer Counties , Texas .
3 . The initial term of this lease shall be for one year from
the date hereof . The term shall be automatically extended for an
additional year , unless one of the parties notifies the other in
writing at least sixty days prior to the end of such term, that
such party desires to terminate the lease . Thereafter, each suc-
ceeding one-year term shall be automatically extended unless one
party gives such written notice of its desire to terminate the
lease .
4 . Department accepts such fire truck in its present condi-
tion, and City makes no warranties nor representations as to its
condition . At the end of the tern, of this lease, Department shall
return the truck to City in as good condition as at the beginning
of the term of this lease, ordinary wear and tear excepted .
5 . Department shall be responsible for all expenses of
maintenance and repairs to such fire truck .
6 . Department shall not sublease this fire truck to anyone
without the prior written consent of City .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
lease the day and year first set out above .
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS
By
City Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk
LAKE ARROWHEAD VOLUNTEER
FIRE DEPARTMENT
By :
ATTEST:
Secretary
LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR JET-SKI RENTAL
AT LAKE WICHITA
This agreement made and entered into this the 4th day of January,
1983, by and between the City of Wichita Falls, hereinafter called
"City" , and Bob Schuchman and C.L. Lakey, hereinafter called "Operators" .
WITNESSETH:
The parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
1. City grants to Operators a license to operate a jet-ski
rental business at Lake Wichita. The rental business will be conducted
on private property, at Lakeshore Marine on Lakeshore Drive .
2. Operators will rent jet skis (small recreational water craft)
to members of the public, to be operated on the surface of Lake
Wichita in a limited area in the vicinity of Lakeshore Marine. Such
limited area shall be defined by City' s Director of Parks and Recreation,
and shall be marked by buoys which shall be furnished at the expense
of operators. Such buoys shall be of a type approved by the Texas
Department of Parks and Wildlife.
3. This license shall be for a term of one year.
4. As this is a new and untried operation which may be profitable
to Operators and which may provide a wholesome recreational opportunity
for the public , no fee will be charged by City to Operators for this
one year license.
5. Operators shall indemnify and hold City harmless from liability
for personal injuries and property damages to jet ski renters and
third persons, arising out of the operation of this jet-ski rental
business. In addition, Operators shall obtain insurance in the amount
of $1,000,000. 00 which will protect Operators and City from liability
for such personal injury and property damages.
6. This license cannot be assigned by Operators without written
consent of City.
7 . Swimming will be prohibited in the area where jet skis are
allowed to operate.
This agreement is executed as of the date first set out above.
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS
BY:
City Manger
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Bob Schuchman
C.L. Lakey
CONTRACT
STATE OF TEXAS 0
COUNTY OF TRAVIS ]
THIS CONTRACT made by and between the State of Texas acting by and through
�T= V the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, hereinafter called the
"State", and the City of Wichita Falls, hereinafter called the "City".
WITNESSETH
>: WHEREAS, the City has made application for a capital improvement grant through
, Y '
the Urban Mass Transportation Administration for financing (1) land acquisition,
(2) site preparation, (3) constructing and equipping a transit maintenance and admin-
istrative facility, and (4) contingencies as described in "Attachment A", hereto; and,
WHEREAS, in response to the City's request, Commission Minute Order Number
78333 authorized the State to provide approximately $81,000 for assisting in financing
said project;
NOW, THEREFORE, the State and the City in consideration of the premises and
mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto, to be made by them, respectively
kept and performed, as hereinafter set forth, hereby agree as follows:
I. The State will pay the City in an amount equal to sixty-five percent (65%)
of the local share of the actual net project cost as determined by the State, or in
F, Y' the amount of Eighty Thousand One Hundred Ten and No/100 Dollars ($80,110.00), which-
-
ever is the lesser. The total payment by the State is generally not to exceed the
total funds authorized by Commission Minute Order Number 78333 in the amount of
Eighty Thousand One Hundred Ten and No/100 Dollars ($80,110.00). In the event of any
adjustments to the Project Budget ("Attachment A"), such adjustments being within
the scope of the original project, allowed and approved by the federal agency, and
so reflected in an amended federal project budget, the State funding for the project
may be similarly amended to reflect an adjusted amount not to exceed sixty-five percent
'z (650) of the local share of the actual net project cost. The State will make payments
' to the City based upon properly prepared and executed Form 132's. The State, through
its District Engineer, will certify by the executed Form 132 that the items indicated
on said form for payment have been received by the City, and the State and City together
i have inspected and accepted the same as satisfactory. The City shall make available
to authorized representatives of the State and Federal agencies involved in this project
- all records applicable to said project for the purpose of audit. All project records
w5 i
{
shall be retained for three (3) years after final payment by the State. Eligibility
of cost to be determined based upon OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and
Local Governments.
II. Project facilities, equipment and/or services shall be used for the provision
of public transportation services described within the duly executed contract between
Yzv
the Urban Mass Transportation Administration and the City for federal project number
TX-05-0075. In the event that any project facility, equipment and/or service are not
q
'F,
used in the proper manner or are withdrawn from public transportation services to be
L M ` ryr 4 used for other than the provision of public transportation services, the City shall
immediately notify the State and shall remit to the State a proportional amount of
^ � the fair market value of such facilities, equipment and/or services on the basis of
the ratio of the grant made by the State to the actual total participating cost of the
.•, � 4 r 1
project. The procedure for determining the fair market value shall be at the option
s of the State as either (1) the value of the property as determined by competent
appraisal , conducted as soon after such withdrawal or misuse occurs as feasible, by
appraiser(s) acceptable to both the City and the State, or (2) actual proceeds from a
public sale, acceptable to both the City and the State, of such property.
III. The purchase of project facilities, equipment and/or services shall begin
within 365 days from the date of final State execution of this contract. If the
t�
purchase of project facilities, equipment and/or services is not begun within the
specified time period, this contract becomes void and State funding is hereby withdrawn.
IV. This contract becomes valid (1) subject to availability of appropriated State
funds and, (2) at such times as a contract between the City and the Urban Mass Trans-
portation Administration has been duly executed which exactly reflects the Project
Budget as described in "Attachment A" hereto, including all estimated costs and a
State share level of funding as reflected by Minute Order Number 78333, and such
contract has been accepted by the State, at the option of the State.
V
S
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
executed on the day of 1982, by the City of Wichita Falls
and on the day of 1982, by the State of Texas.
PARTY OF THE FIRST PART PARTY OF THE SECOND PART
. State of Texas City of Wichita Falls
��� � *"' Certified as being executed for the By: _
purpose and effect of activating
and/or carrying out the orders,
established policies, or work pro- Title
grams heretofore approved and
authorized by the State Highway
and Public Transportation Commission. ATTEST:
APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_ By: _
Engineer-Director
Executed and approved for the State Highway
and Public Transportation Commission under
authority of Commission Minute Order 78501. Countersigned:
i 3
Date: By:
RECOMMENDED FOR EXECUTION: Title:
District Engineer, District 3
s
Director, Finance
A•"' State Transportation Planning Engineer
>> W
S ''r`^�r,?y��e,'�,e�•W,{yyyeNev.'-3 ..#fit
City of Wichita Falls
Estimated Project Budget
TX-05-0075
1. Land acquisition $ 78,000
2. Relocation expense 69,000
3. Construction
Total = $2,467,484
Transit share = $2,467,484 x 14 0 = 345,448
4. Shared use equipment
$147,600 x 14 0 = 20,664
5. Transit shop equipment 40,387
6. Transit administrative equipment 23,935
Sub-total $557,434
Contingency
Item 3 (10 0) $ 34,545
Items 4-6 (57c) 4,249
Sub-total 38 794
Estimated Gross Project Cost G1G 228
ATTACHMENT A
4