Loading...
Min 11/21/2000 206 Wichita Falls, Texas Memorial Auditorium Building November 21, 2000 Items 1 & 2 The City Council of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas met in regular session on the above date in the Council Room of the Memorial Auditorium Building at 8:30 o'clock a.m. with the following members present: Jerry Lueck - Mayor Dan Shine - Pro Tern James Esther, Jr. - Councilors Bill Altman - Johnny Burns - Harold Hawkins - James Berzina - City Manager Greg Humbach - City Attorney Lydia Torres - City Clerk Arthur B. Williams - Absent Mayor Lueck called the meeting to order. Councilor Dan Shine gave the invocation. Item 3 There were no presentations. Item 4 Ruth Hill, 5532 Rhone, parent of Rochelle Finley who was a victim of a vehicle and bicycle accident, stated she had a petition with 200 signatures representing how important it is that some sort of precautions be taken so that the same thing does not happen again. She appreciates the efforts which are now being taken by the City but was concerned that there was a lot of opposition to some of the issues, such as reducing the speed limit and adding school zone signage. She requested that those issues be addressed. She also mentioned that as you approach Hooper the trees on the median cover the school zone sign. City Manager commented that Staff is looking into the whole situation and mentioned that there are state laws and guidelines that need to be adhered. Mrs. Beunafe, 2419 Missile Rd., spoke in favor of decreasing the speed limit and expanding the school zone. She stated that she also had started a petition on her own and asked that Council adopt a resolution to address this situation. Debbie Moon, 6 Worthington Court, wanted to know who would prepare the plan to address this issue. Councilor Hawkins replied that a Traffic Safety Commission is in place and they will discuss this and bring their recommendations to Council. He added that Staff has been looking into this to see what can be done. City Manager commented that the Traffic Safety Commission has to pay very close attention to the Traffic Manual. He said that Staff is looking at lowering the speed limit but if it is too low people will drive at a normal speed in that area. We are also looking at signage and would appreciate any ideas, however, they have to fit in with the Traffic Code. Suggestions can be given to Staff or to the Traffic Commission. 207 Item 4 continued Larry Robinson, 5483 Huntington Lane, said his question regarding public comments had been clarified. Item 5 The Minutes were approved as distributed. Items 6a-7e City Manager gave a briefing on the items listed under the Consent Agenda. Moved by Councilor Hawkins that the consent agenda be approved. Motion seconded by Councilor Shine and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 6a RESOLUTION NO. 151-2000 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT FOR A NON-MATCHING BOAT RAMP REPAIR GRANT; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Item 6b RESOLUTION NO. 152-2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING CERTAIN GRANTS TO ARTS AGENCIES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE WICHITA FALLS ARTS COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS WITH SUCH AGENCIES; DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Items 7a-7e Minutes of the following Board & Commission meetings were received. a. Traffic Safety Commission — October 4, 2000 b. Library Advisory Board — October 24, 2000 c. Park Board — October 26,2000 d. Board of Electrical Examiners — November 9, 2000 e. Wichita Falls Art Commission — November 3, 2000 and November 10, 2000 Item 8a A public hearing was held for the creation of a Storm Water Drainage Utility System for the City of Wichita Falls. Mayor declared the public hearing open. Martin Litteken, 1612 Mesquite, agreed that there should be a method to raise funds or an income stream to bond projects. However, he is concerned about whether the proposed credit to the businesses that already have detention ponds in place is 208 Item 8a continued sufficient. Councilor Hawkins mentioned that there was also a cap and some businesses will receive a real advantage with that cap. Mr. Litteken stated that there is a maximum and most of the ones that would receive that cap do not have a detention facility in place. Councilor Hawkins asked if they would have to retrofit their storm water to bring it up to 1997 classification to get that break. Mr. George Bonnet explained that the prior storm water detention ordinance was changed during its inception to require only detention at the 100-year event which means anything less than the 100 year event blew right on through the system. In essence the downstream facility does not even know the detention is there. If the property owners upgrade the facility to meet the 1997 requirements it would seem appropriate that they receive the 25% reduction. But in absence of that it would be difficult just from a physical examination to justify it. Murray Sallis, owner of Tradewinds Motor Hotel, wanted more information on the proposed ordinance. He is here to find out more about what is going on, and stated he was disappointed that they had not been better informed by Public Works. Mr. Bonnett felt that they had done a good job working with the media and they have given great coverage. Scott Taylor, City Engineer, has worked with the Council sub-committee who has drafted this ordinance and is prepared to make a presentation today. Larry Robinson, 5483 Huntington Lane, expressed concern about the small businesses being able to afford the increase. He asked that they be considered. Councilor Altman commented that small businesses are going to receive a very small charge; it is $1.50 per 3500 square feet. Glen Newton, associated with Econo-Lodge and Wayfarer Motor Hotel, said he wanted additional information on this proposal and mentioned that according to a July Times Record News article on the original proposal they would be paying close to $800/month additional. Councilor Altman informed that the entire ordinance had been published three separate times in the newspaper. David Brock, 1819 Hines, had several questions as to how this would affect him as a small business owner. He wanted to know how the rate would be applied to strip centers, the projected expenses for property owners or small business owners, and how this would apply to vacant property. The ordinance does not answer these questions or how much impervious land I have. Les Seipel, 1010 N. Beverly, agreed with the proposal because it was addressing the flooding problems in our community. He asked about the time frame, the effective date of the charge, and if it was going to be a permanent fee. He also asked when some of the issues we want to charge for are going to be addressed. Mr. Scott Taylor gave a presentation on the proposed ordinance. Over a year ago Council requested that we look at a way to have funds that are permanently available for drainage improvements and we also listed the drainage projects at that time. There are over 50 drainage projects which need to be done at a cost of about $37 million. The various funding options were previously presented to Council and the option Council elected was to go with a storm water drainage utility system. It is a system that is exactly like the water and sewer system, you pay for what you use. He explained how they arrived at the average residence impervious area. We looked at 10% of the City and determined that each residence on an average has 3500 square feet of impervious area, so we have set that as the residential equivalent. In the ordinance it is called a "single family living unit equivalent". All the non-residential customers will be based on that 3500 square feet. The $1.50 was set trying to project revenue to generate between $141.5 million a year for improvements. Given that there are $37 million worth of projects, at $1.5 million a year you are looking at approximately 30 years to complete all the projects. This does not mean it is going to happen like this or in this sequence, it is just to calculate how much is going to be generated each year. 209 Item 8a continued He gave an example on calculating a non-residential charge. A non-residential charge is based on impervious area only. If it has a detention basin they would get a 25% reduction. We also looked at caps and we developed a cap of$500. Of the 3200 non-residential customers only seven of those would have exceeded the cap. You are not looking at many of the facilities being capped. When you look at the detention credit given for those facilities, only two of those facilities have detention and even with the 25% credit they are still above $500 so they would be rolled back to the $500 cap. For the majority of the non-residential customers, which he thinks would be over 50%, the charge would be less than $20/month. We have developed a data base and are working with Finance to integrate it into the billing system and are going to cross reference to enter everyone in the system. He invited anyone who has questions to call his office. He mentioned that there is an appeal process in the ordinance. Councilor Burns stated that there would be no charge to a vacant lot in a commercial area. Mr. Taylor commented that the storm water charge would be applied only if you have another utility charge. If you have no water meter on your lot and it is paved there will be no charge, if the water is turned off or service is discontinued the storm water charge will be disconnected also until the time that account is reactivated or that meter is reinstalled. We will only charge while there is an active utility account. Mr. Taylor informed that at strip malls either the master meter will be billed or if there are separate meters each business will be billed according to ratio of space occupied against total square footage of the building and apply that by the entire impervious area. So if you have 10% of the area of the shopping center your charge will be based on 10% of the total impervious area. Councilor Altman commented that related fees of other cities were much higher than what the Council was considering today. It is the desire to establish a dedicated fund so we systematically set out, over a period of time as we raise the money, to solve the flooding problems in the various areas. Mr. Taylor stated that $540,000 a year is what is expected from the residential charge and a little bit more from the non-residential charge. City Manager commented that 2/3 of the people who have a residence will not feel an affective charge increase. The automated trash collection is producing significant savings in the Sanitation Fund. What is incorporated into this plan is that while there will be a monthly increase of $1.50 to the residences, 2/3 of those residences will receive a credit of$1.50 a month because of the savings at those places where we have automated trash collection. It will be a transfer of charges. Mr. Bonnett informed that the effective date of this ordinance would be May 2001 at which point we anticipate to be fully automated for all of the curbside collection. Therefore, it would be an offsetting charge. In response to Mr. Seipel's question about the length of the fee, Mr. Taylor informed that according to State law this fee must be in place for five years. He added that there are no exemptions and over 70% of other cities do not have exemptions. Murray Sallis, Tradewinds Motor Hotel, expressed concern that older facilities would be penalized because they were not designed with detention facilities in mind. Newer hotel properties are more efficient than older properties like the Tradewinds. You should be looking at un-developed property and vacant parking lots particularly those that earn revenue, such as those parking lots that are rented out and do not have a meter on the site and the owner is bringing in revenue. With a broader number of clients that are included in the ordinance we could bring the rates down if you included more people in that. There are a large number of vacant lots that are also susceptible to run-off water and they are not being charged because they do not have any kind of utility bill at this point. If there is a charge in addition to taxes, the landowners may be more inclined to develop that land if they are finding their charges increasing. He suggested including a broader base to lower the rate. Charles Barr, 2100 Indian Heights, was concerned that the average residential lot is 7200 square feet and we are going to have more than 3500 sq. ft. of impervious land and that is going to double our charge. Mr. Bonnett explained that it was a flat rate for residential property for all areas. Mr. Barr asked if the residents of a newly 210 Item 8a continued developed subdivision with new water detentions were going to receive a credit. Mr. Bonnett responded that they would not be given a credit and added there is a question of whether there should be a provision made to give credit at all. The cost is low enough it is immaterial for residences. David Brock wanted to know how long the offset would be in place. City Manager felt it would be forever because of the significant savings being experienced with the automated collection program. Mr. Brock asked if we were going to wait until we have enough money to do the largest project. City Manager responded that several things are being done and noted that the most expensive project is also the number one project. We have bonding capacity and some other money infused into the project and in the future each year we see taking some of the funds set aside for the biggest project to do immediate projects. We currently have projects underway that are being funded by other means such as CDGB and 4B Sales Tax. Mayor called for additional comments. There being none, Mayor declared the public hearing closed. Item 9a ORDINANCE NO. 112-2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A NEW CHAPTER 33 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO BE ENTITLED "STORMWATER DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM" (SDUS); PROVIDING FOR STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS TO SATISFY THE IMPLEMENTATION STEPS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH SUCH SDUS; APPROVING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES; ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Esther that Ordinance No. 112-2000 be approved. Motion seconded by Councilor Shine. Councilor Hawkins informed that he received a call asking about the possibility of changing from alley trash pick up to automated collection. City Manager stated that our plan is only to address the existing curb pick up to the automated collection. However, if we receive evidence that the majority or 100% of the neighborhood wants to change, we will find a way to pick up isolated areas. We would accommodate it if there were a well-supported effort in certain neighborhoods to make the change. Mr. Bonnett suggested that consideration be given to doing it on a total alley by total alley basis for administration purposes. Councilor Altman commented that if this ordinance is passed and we start collecting funds it will be up to subsequent councils, once the funds are collected, to determine how fast or slow these problem areas are attacked. Subsequent councils may decide to issue some bonds based on the revenue stream to attack these problems a little faster or they may decide on a pay as you go program - collect the money and pay, not issue bonds. We do have objective criteria for ranking the projects assuming they are not changed, it will be incumbent upon future councils to decide how fast the money is spent on these projects through the various mechanisms. All we are attempting to do at this time is set in place a mechanism by which we have a funding source over the next 20-30 years that will be sufficient to ultimately get rid of this flooding problem for the entire community. Motion carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None 211 Item 9b A proposed ordinance was presented amending Section 4 of Ordinance 61-2000 to exempt plant nurseries utilizing water for plant stock production from the water conservation surcharge requirements that apply during drought conditions. Moved by Councilor Burns that proposed ordinance be approved. Motion seconded by Councilor Hawkins. Council expressed the following concerns: 1) the Water Resources Commission has not reviewed this, 2) only one business is addressed , 3) the refund in the commentary is not addressed in the proposed ordinance, 4) wording is not specific enough to the commercial nurseries. Moved by Councilor Altman to table this item. Motion seconded by Councilor Esther and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 9c ORDINANCE NO. 113-2000 ORDINANCE MAKING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR ADDITIONAL GRANT REVENUE RECEIVED FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT ACCEPTING SAME; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Shine that Ordinance No. 113-2000 be approved. Motion seconded by Councilor Altman and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 9d ORDINANCE NO. 114-2000 ORDINANCE MAKING AN APPROPRIATION IN THE GENERAL FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,000 FOR THE PURCHASE OF A REPLACEMENT HEMATOLOGY CELL COUNTER FOR THE LABORATORY DIVISION OF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Altman that Ordinance No. 114-2000 be approved. Motion seconded by Councilor Shine and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None 212 Item 9e ORDINANCE NO. 115-2000 ORDINANCE MAKING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR ADDITIONAL GRANT REVENUE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) WAVE GRANT (FY 2001) FOR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT SAME; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Altman that Ordinance No.115-2000 be passed. Motion seconded by Councilor Burns and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 9f ORDINANCE NO. 116-2000 ORDINANCE MAKING AN APPROPRIATION IN THE SANITATION FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $43,000 FOR THE COST OF A REPLACEMENT TRAILER; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Burns that Ordinance No. 116-2000 be passed. Motion seconded by Councilor Altman and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 10a RESOLUTION NO. 153-2000 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE AGREEMENT WITH CRYOVAC, INC. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE WICHITA FALLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CORPORATION'S FY 2000-2001 BUDGET; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Altman that Resolution No. 153-2000 be passed. Motion seconded by Councilor Shine. Mr. Ron Mertens with BCI and Mr. Mike Henderson, Cryovac' Plant Manager, spoke in favor of this resolution. Motion carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None 213 Item 10b RESOLUTION NO. 154-2000 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, TO NOMINATE CRYOVAC, INC. AS AN ENTERPRISE ZONE PROJECT TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Shine that Resolution No. 154-2000 be passed. Motion seconded by Councilor Altman and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 10c RESOLUTION NO. 155-2000 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO CERTIFY THE 1999/2000 SECTION 8 MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (SEMAP) SCORE; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Altman that Resolution No. 155-2000 be passed. Motion seconded by Councilor Esther and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 10d RESOLUTION NO. 156-2000 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH ROBERT HAGERMAN AS TENNIS PRO AT WEEKS PARK TENNIS CENTER; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW Moved by Councilor Altman that Resolution No. 156-2000 be passed. Motion seconded by Councilor Esther. City Attorney suggested that under "Termination", Page 2 of the Memorandum of Understanding, the phrase "for cause" be deleted. City Attorney stated that all City employees, except civil service employees and independent contractors are at will. He added that the contract would be in conflict with the term which is a month to month contract. The issue of having two tennis pros was discussed and next time there is a vacancy this issue will be reviewed. Moved by Councilor Altman to amend the contract by deleting the phrase "for cause" in the "Termination" paragraph on page 2 of the contract. Sentence would read: "It is understood and agreed that the City Manager of the City may at any time cancel this contract after giving thirty (30) days notice in writing of cancellation to Tennis Pro." 214 Item 10d continued Motion seconded by Councilor Burns and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Main motion as amended carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Lueck, Councilors Shine, Esther, Altman, Burns, and Hawkins Nays: None Item 11 a Council wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. Councilor Esther asked for patience to deal with what the City will have to confront in the future and that the entire City be cohesive. Councilor Hawkins hopes that the Traffic Safety Commission will set the child safety issue as a priority. Councilor Altman looks forward to next year with new opportunities and challenges. Mayor stated that the issue of trees planted in the medians be looked into. Item 11 b City Manager provided dates, time, and places of the District Meetings. Item 12 The City Council adjourned at 10:50 a.m. PASSED AND APPROVED this '� day of � �, 2000. 1"' —Z,� RRY LUECK MAYOR ATTEST: Lydia Torres City Clerk 1 1 1 NOTICE OF MEETING Regular Meeting Of The Mayor And City Council Of The City Of Wichita Falls, Texas To Be Held In The City Council Chambers Of The Memorial Auditorium, 1300 Seventh Street, On Tuesday, November 21 , 2000, Beginning At 8:30 a.m. City Council: Mayor Gerald Lueck - Councilors Arthur Bea Williams, Dan Shine, James Esther, William Altman, Johnny Burns, and Harold Hawkins 1 . Call to Order. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Dennis Wilkinson Floral Heights United Methodist Church 3. Presentations: 4. Comments From The Public To Members Of The City Council On Items That Are Not On The City Council Agenda. (The Regular Agenda will begin upon completion of public comments, or no later than 9:00 a.m. Individuals who prior to this Council meeting signed up to speak, but could not be heard before 9:00 a.m. due to time constraints, may speak at the conclusion of the meeting.) 5. Approval of Minutes CONSENT AGENDA 6. Resolutions: a. Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Submit An Application To The Texas Parks & Wildlife Department For A Non-Matching Boat Ramp Repair Grant. (City Council Bill #284) b. Resolution Approving Certain Grants To Arts Agencies As Recommended By The Wichita Falls Arts Commission And Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into Contracts With Such Agencies. (City Council Bill #285) 7. Receive Minutes: City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2000 Page 2 a. Traffic Safety Commission — October 4, 2000 b. Library Advisory Board — October 24, 2000 c. Park Board — October 26, 2000 d. Board of Electrical Examiners — November 9, 2000 e. Wichita Falls Arts Commission — November 3, 2000 — November 10, 2000 REGULAR AGENDA 8. Public Hearings: a. Public Hearing For The Creation Of A Storm Water Drainage Utility System For The City Of Wichita Falls. 9. Ordinances: a. Ordinance Establishing A Storm Water Drainage Utility System For The City Of Wichita Falls. (City Council Bill #286) b. Ordinance Amending Section 4 Of Ordinance 61-2000 To Exempt Plant Nurseries Utilizing Water For Plant Stock Production From The Water Conservation Surcharge Requirements That Apply During Drought Conditions. (City Council Bill #287) c. Ordinance Making An Appropriation To The Special Revenue Fund For Additional Grant Revenue Received From The Texas Department Of Health And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute A Contract Accepting Same. (City Council Bill #288) d. Ordinance Making An Appropriation In The General Fund In The Amount Of $8,000 For The Purchase Of A Replacement Hematology Cell Counter For The Laboratory Division Of The Health Department. (City Council Bill #289) e. Ordinance Making An Appropriation To The Special Revenue Fund For Additional Grant Revenue Received From The State Of Texas For The Texas Department Of Transportation Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Wave Grant (FY 2001) For Traffic Enforcement And Authorizing The City Manager To Accept Same. (City Council Bill #290) City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2000 Page 3 9. Ordinances (cont'd): f. Ordinance Making An Appropriation In The Sanitation Fund In The Amount Of $43,000 For The Cost Of A Replacement Trailer. (City Council Bill #291) 10. Resolutions: a. Resolution Authorizing An Economic Development Incentive Agreement With Cryovac, Inc. As Recommended By The Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation And Approving An Amendment To The Corporation's FY 2000- 2001 Budget. (City Council Bill #292) b. Resolution Nominating An Application From Cryovac, Inc. For An Enterprise Zone Project. (City Council Bill #293) c. Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Certify The 1999/2000 Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) Score. (City Council Bill #294) d. Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Execute A Contract With Robert Hagerman As Tennis Pro At Weeks Park Tennis Center. (City Council Bill #295) 11 . Other Council Matters: a. Discussion Of Items Of Concern To Members Of The City Council. b. Staff/Council Discussion. 12. Adjourn. Wheelchair or handicapped accessibility to the meeting is possible by using the handicapped parking spaces and ramp located off the east parking lot on the Sixth Street entrance. Spanish language interpreters, deaf interpreters, Braille copies or any other special needs will be provided to any person requesting a special service with at least 24 hours notice. Please call the City Clerk's Office at 761-7409. City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2000 Page 4 CERTIFICATION I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at Memorial Auditorium, Wichita Falls, Texas on the day of , 20 at o'clock (a.m.)(p.m.). City Clerk