Zoning Board of Adjustments Minutes - 05/20/2015MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
May 20, 2015
Kerry r Chairman
0 Members
Jerry
David
Steve
David l
0 ARLmate #2
Kinley Hegglund, City Attorney
0 Legal Dept.
Karen t , Planning Administrator
Christopher Guess, Planner 11
Larry Ash
0 Member
Warren Gardner
0 Afternale et
Casey O'Donnell
0 Atternals.0
Tyson Traw
Alternate A
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman - Maroney called ti to r r at ,
1111. MINUTES
Jerry Beaver moved to v minutes f the r 18,
2015
meeting, Adjustment Zvi II _ ti
r.
_
unanimously
minutes r presented.
III. REGULAR AGENDA
Case V 1-
Request r a variance from the required it i limit line l t
Street, Holliday - Street, Ervay Street, and Kell Boulevard frontage
Holliday Street
Chairman "r r. Guess to present the qualifying criteria.
QUALIFYING CRITERIA
ti Submission . r > it
special 1. State _ conditions circumstances _ exist i ch are peculiar to the land,
structure, or building is g
structures, or building .
t, m
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MAY 20, 2015
PAGE 1
Staff ti variance would prepare i r`sl
development i in r i t Commercial i district
It commercial i abuts. special rii leges would be conferred
owner _ of this _ land which r- denied t-_ t_ r land owners in irie.
Staff It the qualifying criteria t and recommended review f the evaluation
criteria.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
following eI i i i evaluated )
granting 1. The i will i interest.
' Special conditions , other than financial i , r literal
Ordinance enforcement of the terms of the _ will result in hardship
to the owner of the land.
3. The variance will r i activity i is
the terms of the _ Zoning Ordinance.
granting 4. The variance:
• Is consistent with this Ordinance; _
in i l and
Will injurious to the ne-i detrimental public - welfare.
Mr. David Lane moved to r v the li i criteria, r. Jerry Beaver seconded.
The qualifying criteria were approved with a unanimous vote.
r® Guess proceeded to r the f' r the ri ance. He noted the r l at
Holliday i i i t development Kell
`
- the regulatory ti on which required - i" ti land for
Boulevard frontage
right-of-way. Addi i 1, staff the it - received i t from the 2005
r_ r e Plan based on - the criteria that both the it Wichita l it
development public departments expressed __ long-term oshort-term
plans to i or extend Ervay Street. it is in the r of a neighborhood is
contains it f single family dwellings, i Ili t° l uses, and
manufactured
Staff recommended r ri
Staff ti i 1 surrounding r r i i favor, in
_opposition, received _ it h no opinion/undecided. There wer
responses received from i the _ notification area.
Mr. Dennis Probst, ' applicant, thanked , board .t for convening for this n
property case. He stated the ri r Il right-of-way TXDCT pur they
built Kell and they determined that it was excess right-of-way t it ' r sale
and Mr. r t -_ land. I addition, r. Probst pointed t t Galveston r
i9l
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MAY 20, 2015 PAG