Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Res 2333 5/1/1979
RESOLUTION NO. GJ RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT WITH JOE NALL ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF A RATE-MAKING SYSTEM FOR WATER SERVICES. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: A contract with Joe Nall & Associates, based on the attached proposal, for the design, preparation and develop- ment of a water rate-making system is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute such contract with Joe Nall & Associates. PASSED AND APPROVED this the i -day of May, 1979. M A Y O R ATTEST: City Clerk 4:.. ,,-•,-, .- , A fri.:, 9., 7:' T; A ''",--k'',,•,- ''' s', ''-' - -.' 1:‘,„..".''''.,i'f,;:.' •,'''''• -,...."'7,,‘',,,`,.. t,-, ,..‘le,. t'Al, t.',1`---7t4„,,I,, .,-, '.0..„'`,.' t7,4#..,k,k-,ic' ,,4'1., ! Y,- - '4';.. .`' - , 4-,.' k - , ',,,r4'... ' ", :`,:,•,',11A. "' ''''"f.'.1,'' .,44- ..= ", I A' ' 4 -41-'''`-. r' ' 31.z4-1,', 'C ,.'4:,,..0 .t . Ai, 1: e' ' '?1/'4V4.,At".fia 'IL'': Ift,i',r7,1fe '4, Z‘"; 2,8# 4:•-_- ''''.r-;"Z ,',,',:.; ;',::Z.',-,-',.: s-: -'..', 6"';','"':,,$.1-."%.,-„7-,'.Q.k, .,,4,V,,',2; -: Ps' ',7:,-, 1. 4;lt'„:1;tX•4.4' 441 i ',,41..-,,,-,1 --,i,, ,,,,k. „? '4 I.,-, -, -lizri...*"!Afr.i.,1 •, 7,, `l, ... =1 tei?'," I.14,, ,;$44,:-.;:) A , ' .4-,`!„.1,/,':4:1,",1'"i4',1,,rk, 0 . .t4rtili o),,',,,,i4;4... c-V-w,4.i "g", -..t Cl'I'4.%'" k0.14 '''''S ''',0 s ' i .' 7,C.- ' -74:' Vr-flv `''-,';`•,,JOE M. NALL AND ASSOCIATES,' INC.. , ,,,....,::,1-2.....,, .i-:, ,....0,7-4-,44 ......„4,,,.. .. ... 74 -,,,'4 •.44"-Irs'lt- • it 1--IV".• .,,t•:,'': ''''''). r.' '',.. ',.',. 47, ,•:, ',P:41.1.,' ,„', , 4 •." ritlk,....''''' .7 s'14.11"ip':7, 1,,..;..,2 _' '+ C,n s u 1 t i na Engineers = ,,r- -„,.,--, ., .,t41„, ,7y‘ -,„ ,,71,.. fl: 1,,.:„ ,, ki,,,,,,r- Consulting 2.1.,,,,, ..„.•,.4..,,,,,rop,• ,,,,? , ,.-H ;,..,,,---`-'‘..,; :•.1 - ,,,,4,.-,,,.. t. , ,,„I4.... ," 4..,„,.,,, -,,,,,, 7 .. r,„.. 41,4: ..?..;.-', -4,-,,,,,,P,,-iit:,,,, A.,,,,,, , , :,,• , ,,.'.- l•,-..'!' ,, t '..,.... ::, •,-4,,,d''''',st,rA ,t ' 4';''1.--I''''.. MUNICIPALITY WORK ORDER ,L,-,,,,- -,,:„.', 1.,..,.:.--rz,,',. .4*(4-„*, f,,,, 0- .• -;...., ...- ,me-.4.4.1A, •,..6 "‘•-i,A.,,,'i It„'-''',r.;fr•q,4 .,, -,,",-,i,, 1 ii•",1:6114 i•-• ' '' 'V .,..., , ,t. !,4,.., 4, _. ..,., ,..;:, ttels,'($ '444 ,1•A. 0,,vitkl. iur,---,-Ir.s,k' t'rk'''"''',„tg At!'*,'';=.0,-....-i''',4''' '''''' 4,04'3,,4"."4'": t' ' ''ar - '1'-':. ....Y.'‘, ".•44 ' 4'6 ' L '; ', 11t04.::', 1 ''''&01.I',.. t,''''''',f',7.,- -' ',?'I,'*• 7.i,,, ' - -` . .,'t'*="•..i` .. -'-'k''''-"qt . W. s. p.:443.,4,74,..s..,-, .-,--,..-,1.--,r.i'' ' ..'14, t ,-.7 01- '‘'''l t:•i'''.•r.,,,,,,`N.411 -•fisk4.0.,, ,,,;••4,••• t'ii, 1,,4`,..,,,,,--,,,.,1,, IQTE' .,'''.- --,:::.,,,- -1.April.,:,g5,$)'.1 979.-,..J , ' ,--i- -,,N,,;.,t,i.,,A,',.14,,, -..,..1?1;. ,,,,.. ` .. ::. L, - .4,- fr- I-.,-, v tu 4. - - - c IENT.-"- ''A,,-.!,,,,e, City of Wichita Falls, Texas ',‘.17e4-- " ' , , ",•,--'.24-.104';;....'rs,-,,',-- -41,.'.,'-- -'•,..-.(.. 9. . ,,,'1.;-- t ... Fox, . . if,s;As'14 We'„, ;,:," c',..4", 1..,-''',1",%' ,I. '',,'' •,,,,.,,,I,'/....,;or .,:"73 44 '' ' '''",','.1',4,t','.,' o ft' -k,,l-k.',- Mr t.--Gerald LI.,,, -City.Manager:,,w_,,,. e61, '":>,,,,I,a 4,4 -$.4,.. -,, ,4,;-„,,iv-,,,,, ,, ,,f,„ 4,..,44_ •,,;.,,, ,i)f , VI ‘„P,;• 5-S-r-,,,,k3;,,P ' 4.'0 4,..'.7 ,. ; ' 'c'e,•% k4,.'., 1i:VI,.,,•.1-4:- , 44;t1:i.F..,-....,,-.4-1,4,1 i•;:" ,,b-7rw-,..,4. 1 , -„" -5' '.'•".44'. Ii.....','t 4 '.., '7 r-,; 11"A''':4._•*1-','';' ,2*'•:- r'''`', .,: 11::-•"-',,#,''•'.- :..-=`--:'-',-, ,-•7,.-41g.:'-',1*,:.f1:,1 Ali " - - .,- - , ---; , 4 DD'ESS: ::1.‘k;,* P. O. Box .,..,. i,..,,,,,,,,,„ ,....-.-2.,,,,,,,.. 1,..),Wichita Falls Texas ;76307 ''''''''''''''''' '-1"‘ifi.'24': 13':: tA'1.' ' '-'4",k•s',V, 1,;,...4"! ,I.', i7 , , /:t •;- -v,-, 4,- 74:= -,' - -,--,',.-:,› Azk.g•••,-.,, „,- -, 4, , ..7 ii..g.......-.9x. - r 4,- .,-,41,,-„-•/' 1..,,id, .,',„,-, -03' m t,:t."'iT'''...:-1, 1,,,,„P-,,.: 74JMN Job .No07-79-WC--m,.... • ' zt,f,,-4,...;,vc.`'',,v'e -' 'ROJ T. -4'-' ''' Development of Rate Making.sy§tem . ka' 1. ,-,,,,,* ,-Afe.vsk, A n 4..:*,0-•1''. i-',,,,-t-IN., dlt vs.f,-i.'r„A,'*'-'''.:;&x.-.ariui-roPert.Y ,,RecY,u,s,r,A.,A10:1),`Z'"--4-'-:,•,'^..:',f'"" t..=.0-4,..,4,-,n'T= ,. ,i,A.=4= '..i'1%-$=,..k-`5'7 tS `'` r.14t44'4:Zir433..'7,/..,,,,Z-,D,46"047,1405,-Acl,.',4.,,V:,2,i'V,,,,'74,..,r-t,:i:.zZ.,--,A'';:"' g''''.''''' ki 6-1.41.. ;, -',4'402.„-4 -4 ,r;;;Ae:it 3t:41019Ntg.",': tt!,,,,, , ,•,,,i: A, C vA14:56.,:g:Ael*,,ilftr14,i1:i4,;`:p:i.:.,t1 1'4',C1-k:ge"'";%''''t5..N•'' : i:,V,•••.t. :V4W1,A.74,-.„..---_,' 1'-,,;-',- ,.., 45 1,4,CO ,0 F--SERVICES to. st:$,,,,,t4...sart- ,..A.,.A,-- . -, -4, ...:-,..14-,‘'; , ,.r.., ,,,- i ., - 4:- provide expert assistance to the City of Wichita Falls in analyzing the WaterOperationsforthedeterminationoftheservicecost, the recommendations for adequatef;rates to recover the cost by function, the development„of a continuingng,,rate making„,,,,ps.,TA..;,..--,,,,, ,,.. ,A A:-stem, and the 'finding of plant survivors byaccount It These services are to be provided at the direction of the City Manager and shall "Z;i4 Tinclude but not be limited to: Analyses of the Water Plant investment and operations. ,„",„ for the determination of the proper:adjusted value- ratebase, rate., structure, revenue2:7,- f\ ,.re q u 1 remen t s, revenue;;expectations, operatingTexpenses, allocation of expenses, eturn of investment, andicapital, requiremene;for water,-services'.furni.shgcte:to ,the.,'1,;":!4,, t • :',. - , , ich*ta Falls consumers I The ConsultingTEngineer's findings and recommendations shall be set forth in a written letter-type report with organized data to the City of Wichita Falls within a , t. reasonable period of time, not to exceed eight months after all necessary underlying -, 4- 1.,,,i-:‘,-,-,•records, documents and other information,,have; be,en reviewed, and-the PlaritirinY,9n.td)!:)Fd.;1,.- l-td/ Af.. o'-''r s' imuy'l4:i ate, d'-' by'-,the'. Consultant. 7 4Y 44t 4cf:,,‘ 4:` 4, i s-t 4 • `rt,-:, -.7;, ,. ., .,,,..,-4,',/' ,•4,1'$ . 4"4” --'''' ILLI NG AND ACCOUNT I NG DATA:'''''-' 1 ''''-';'` '1'''''''''.-':—..--'''''''''?::-Ift'''.''''N'...:"---- 17 ff.'"---;" 17'''''' ' ' ' '-' ,,..' ' st'•'''''' " ,4 1.1,! ':•„1., 7'..4 _S- • i•'''',4";\'•' ".... t - ,'r''41'0 • For services rendered, the Client shall pay Joe M. Nall and Associates, Inc. ,t,,,,,,,_Consulting Engineers, upon submission of monthly'invoices, an amount equal to the actual hours of services furnished multiplied by the product of the Consulting ngineer)s establ i shed.'hourly salary.cost, this expense shall come from current revenue orfrp,m,,,4,4, 7,„taxes which the municipality, agrees to levy for the purpose of paying the same. - ' ',,,• 1711",''''' . In addition, the Client shall reimburse the Consulting Engineer each month .at4: ,, ,ycost for„all _out-of-pocket expenses directly chargeable to the work. s-, ,-...1 .•'44, a: --, '-' •. i's 24'The service billings of.the Consulting Engineer will be restricted to a _ ,,,,.. , ,_,,,,,..,..e.--.'. .*.. maximum of $80,205.00. A--.-.-A =r4 v' APPROVED FOR:,4' City of Wichita Falls 2,.":":14--' APPROVED FOR: Joe M. Nail & Associates, .Inc. 17, By• 7..c.,;;-',—f'.---'.' •.131.i 1-,,--,,,y.- --- .':':- "•-- tl e: President --..---, 4'.' " , -'.1;.• „ :`,1, ' Date-,: it-l• f'''''' 5,.. %...stet .1 ,.,,-V--''' ' T'' tk;fe..) '''' ' : '-`441,4;"r4. •tr''' '''‘4"?'-,tsi,;''.. '', „:-‘,,,g„4„,, ,...,„„Jr-k!,':,.3-ne:'..:v6. 11,1',>Ir',';',',,,,,,,,,, ,`„i P..- ' .,',f ._ tr!, , ' ,,,,,I'ir,'''',,. ;;t.- t%'',' 4,4`4‘2.,) -' 44'2'' ..5s,- & -IC,— ',4,-,.., .A),-,,,,- v.'`i •,, .:,3r ., .: .,, t,44,0 S.,.. -4',...,'.! .,,,,,t.',) c, .,' .....— `,44: ',„',-,,,, 1.r'= kt-=, "-Nr,=- , '' = " 1-='41, =,,,:irs# ; '''",,f.rV,=='1F.,ft cr4''' ."4'`:. ' APR 25 1979 F. PROJECT COST Our Property Record Development and Rate Making System Development Proposal addresses itself to several specific areas of determination, and the amount of Consultant 's fee associated to each of the areas include: 1. Inspect and verify the installation dates and unit costs of property in the central plant (reservoir, trans- mission , and treatment ) . $20,160. 2. Arrange central plant data for extension and cost trending on a continuing basis (CPR) . $ 5, 775. 3. From plant balances and additions records, simulate the distribution plant by account to determine the properties ' expected life, average age vintage year, and surviving cost . $12,000. 4. By statistical sampling approach, inspect and verify the survivors of the simulated property of the -distribution plant . $10,250 . 5. Arrange distribution plant data for extension and cost trending for future revenue deficiency determination. $5, 775. 6. Examine and assess the operation, maintenance, and general expenses directly assigned or allocated to the reservoir cost , transmission cost , purification cost , and distribution cost . $7,850. 7. Evaluate and ensure that total rate of return is between floor and ceiling for monetary return. $925. 8. Determine the theoretical reserve for depreciation and evaluate the expected life of each depreciation account.$3, 100. 9. , Review the water consumption habits of the consumers by class and determine their cost of service at each functional stage. $3,975. 10. Prepare the rate making system data for the revenue deficiency determination on a continuing cost basis. $3, 100. 11. Develop a rate structure comparison to clearly define the commodity and capacity charges based on the generally accepted current use maximum day average demand with customer peak hour demand irrespective of the time of day, and show the effects of combining the rate for maximum day and rate for peak excess and the effects of reservoir charge based on future demand. $3,475. 11 - ANk 2 5 1979 12. (As an alternate to No. 1 . ) From plant balances and additions records simulate the central plant by account to determine the properties ' expected life, average age, vintage year and surviving cost , and by statistical sampling approach, inspect and verify the survivors of the simulated property of ' the central plant. $10, 150. 13. (As an alternate to No. 2. ) Arrange the central plant simulated data for extension and cost trending for future revenue deficiency determination. $3,925. The following is a breakdown of project costs byConsultantlevel: Percent of Dollars Days Total Time (Base) (Alternate) Principal Engineer 29.6 8.2 10, 360 10,360 Project Supervisor/ Data Manager 32.8 9. 0 10, 332 14, 550 Examiner/Accountant 66. 0 18.2 18, 480 23,100 Staff Engineer/Analyst 105.6 29.2 18,430 11 ,430 Engineering Technician 75. 7 20.9 9,543 5,085 Surveying/Drafting 52. 8 14. 5 9,240 362. 5 100.0. 76, 385 64,525 Estimate of directly chargeable expenses - $ 3,820 3,225 TOTALS 80,205 67,750 12 - in PROPOSAL FOR THE PREPARATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A RATE MAKING SYSTEM WITH THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PLANT INVESTMENT FOR THE WATER OPERATION WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS APO 25 1979 April 23, 1979 JOE M. NALL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2920 Lemmon Avenue East Dallas, Texas 75204 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. STUDY OBJECTIVES 1 B. STUDY APPROACH 1 - 3 C. PROJECT ORGANIZATION 3 - 7 D. QUALIFICATIONS 8 - 9 E. PROJECT WORK SCHEDULE 10 F. PROJECT COST 11 - 12 A. STUDY OBJECTIVES This Water Rate Making and Property Identification Proposal has been developed to address several specific areas believed necessary to support the City's directive. These areas include: . 1. Preparation and development of a rate making system which would have acceptable rate making features into which the City could plug data annually to determine what are the proper rates for revenue requirements of the Water System. 2. Determination of the proper rates to be charged for both raw and treated water for 1979-80. 3. Identification of the Water Plant in service and its related cost. 4. Analyzing rate structures for future capacity require- ments. B. STUDY APPROACH The rate making system to be installed and methodology is discussed in the following paragraphs: 1. Operation Capital Requirements, Operating Expenses, and Adjusted Valuation of Invested Capital. A financial need objective of Wichita Falls Water Operation will be first determined and then gauged by the Fair Return Standard of the 1975 Public Utility Act . We propose to follow the usual practice in the rate determination process to equate total revenue with total cost of service plus any added return required in finance coverage and stipulated percentage return on equity. Plant simulation is ;a customary approach to plant valuation in the absence of a continuing property record. We propose to develop a continuing record of the reservoir, transmission and purification plant and a simulated property record of the distribution plant. Identification of the plant and confirmation of the plant records will be performed by a statisti- cal sample approach. The weighting given to current and original cost can be held to the minimum 25/75 weight with no argument . The 32. 5/67. 5 weighting has been acceptable as a 1 mid point of compromise. We would propose a 40% weighting to current cost until the new reservoir is placed in service, as the system will be opera- ting at maximum capacity. 2. Revenue Expectations, Revenue Requirements and _ploca-- tion of Expenses We consider it necessary that investment , revenues and expenses be representative of normal operations, so that the rates we develop are appropriate for application in the immediate future. Our cost of service study will be so premised. The Wichita Falls Water Operation property, engineering, customer accounting, and other records are basic sources from which the data utilized in our cost of service study is extracted. The costs that are distributed to the various classes of service will be the costs used in determining the operation 's overall earnings position. Such cost will be adjusted to present normal operating condi- tions as accurately as possible. Any abnormalities will be distributed to the various classes of service in the proper propor- tions. It should be recognized that our results are not absolute, but indicate the relative earnings positions of the different rate classes. The costs that we distribute to the various classes of service will be directly related to Wichita Falls ' overall earnings position rather than unadjusted costs. The demands of the various rate classes and their interrelationship with total system demand is determined. Time restraints normally dictate that our approach be that of estimating the demands based on consumption by rate class. In our derivation we anticipate using estimated load factors obtained in previous load studies from Wichita Falls. 3. Return on Investment The "rate of return" can be held to a weighted percentage level on that portion of plant where the debt is not yet retired for which money has cost the City, and on the remainder of the invest- ment in plant for which new money can cost the City. This way of determining "rate of return" is designed to avoid taking inflation into account in any way other than property valuation. 2 - 4. Rate Structures We have proposed to follow the usual practice in the rate determination process to equate total revenue with total cost of service plus the added return stipulated on equity and required in finance coverage. This full cost pricing concept encourages the development of rates that track the average total cost of water supply. Recent attempts in rate design by our State Commission have been to shift to commodity charges a greater proportion of capacity charges. This was done to increase customer awareness of actual cost implications of their patterns of consumption. But historical average costs are the basis of the Commission 's rates, and capacity charges are generally related to a customer's own maximum demand irrespective of its relation to the time of the system peak. This means , they have not and we have not abandoned a cost-of-service standard for pricing utility rates and have not transferred to another standard of cost pricing. The election of an acceptable rate design that is consistent with the standards of the industry should be the prerogative of the Water Utility. A two part (volume - capacity) rate based on the average and excess demand is generally accepted. Our three primary objectives in rate design are a) the financial need objective; (b) the fair- cost apportionment objective; and (c) the optimum- use objective. We propose to follow these objectives. C. PROJECT ORGANIZATION Over the past eight years we have developed extensive computer mechanized capability. The successful field applications of our programs are directly attributable to the quality of staff in our organization. In addition to our Principal Engineer, this staff includes : Mr. Seth Stephens , graduate accountant and Past President of the Dallas Chapter of Data Processing Management Association ; Mr. David Lyndon , graduate Electrical Engineer, with training in Cost Studies and Analytical Analysis; Mr. Phil E. Fox, CPA, experienced private and municipal controller of utility accounting; and other qualified personnel as needed. We propose to start this Water Utility Plant Identifica- tion and Rate Making System Development assignment immediately. We will set forth our tentative findings and recommendations in both oral and written reports to the City Manager by December 31, 1979. 3 - JOE M. NALL PRESIDENT AND PROJECT MANAGER Education : University of Texas, BS, Civil Engineering, 1951 Registered Professional Engineer, State of Texas Professional Experience: 1970 to Present Joe M. Nall and Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineer in transportation planning, engineering, data management , and analytical services for communtities , utilities and regulatory commissions. Specializes in utility rate services and utility rate consultation. 1958 to 1970 City of Dallas, Texas Supervisor of Public Utilities , in charge of administrative coordination and development of facts to support his role as principal regulatory agent for the City of Dallas as related to transit service, taxicab and limousine service, gas transmission , gas distribution , electric distri- bution, and telephone. 1951 to 1958 Phillips Petroleum Company Design Engineer Other Professional Activities : Staff assistant and Lecturer, Public Utility Economics Course , Southern Methodist University. Contributor to Material , Association of Railroad and Utility Commissioners course, University of Wisconsin. Supervised the preparation , and presented award winning paper on Marginal Cost Pricing to Utility Valuation and Rate-Making Con-ference, Iowa State University. 4 - SETH STEPHENS VICE PRESIDENT AND PROJECT SUPERVISOR Education : University of Texas at Arlington , Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting, 1961 Professional Experience: 1971 to Present Joe M. Nall and Associates, Inc. Development of new data processing applications to meet requirements of local government , with emphasis on providing accounting and data processing connected with utility rate analysis and cost of service studies. 1952 to 1971 City of Dallas, Texas Systems Analyst , Programming Supervisor , Operations supervisor, Systems and Programming Manager and Data Base Manager, EDP Division of City Auditor ' s Office. Developed computerized systems in the areas of real estate and personal property taxes , water utility customer service and billing, municipal court dockets and records, public health programs , city election vote counts, police incident and arrest applications. Project Director in the development and implementation of the police information system presently used by Dallas Police Department . Other Professional Activities: City of Dallas representative to Metropolitan Symposium Seminar at San Jose , California and Poughkeepsie, New York at which he had papers published on local government data processing. Member of Curriculum Election Committee for the Bachelor of Computer Systems Management degree, Dallas Baptist College. 5 - DAVID K. LYNDON ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Education : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, 1978 Professional Experience : 1978 to Present Joe M. Nall and Associates , Inc. Conduction of property valuation studies of telephone toll facilities and electric distri- bution facilities. Evaluation of utility service costs for electric and gas operations. Design of utility rate structures. Technical Experience: 1974 to 1978 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Joe M. Nall and Associates , Inc . Completed undergraduate degree in June 1978 . and has been accepted in the engineering graduate program. First employed as technician in con- sulting engineering in summer of 1974, advancing each summer to a more responsible assignment in service qu,i I i I.•y meN:;nremenl, of communication networks , of gas distribution systems and of electric transmission systems. Also participated in utility plant location mapping by mechanical plotter. Coordinated the data accumulation and inventory for the continuing record of gas distribution system. Other Professional Activities : Completed the Engineer in Training examination for Professional Registration and preparing for the Professional Engineering examination . Member of Eta Kappa Nu, Honorary Electrical Engineering Society. 6 - PHILIP E. FOX SENIOR EXAMINER Education : Southern Methodist University , BBA in Accounting Certified Public Accountant , State of Texas, since 1957 Professional Experience: 1976 to Joe M. Nall and Associates , Inc. Present Examination of utility accounting records and the develop- ment of information to meet current regulatory requirements , with emphasis on providing data connected with utility rate analysis and cost of service studies. 1973 to Transit Management Corporation 1976 Served one year as Director of Finance for Citran, the transit system of Fort Worth, Texas , and two years as Director of Finance for the Kansas City Area Transit Authority. Instigated the new chart of accounts for transit in Kansas City and placed it on computer. 1964 to City of Dallas Transit System 1973 Continuous service as Comptroller, charged with super- vision of the financial and accounting functions of the system. 1935 to Dallas Railway & Terminal Company 1964 Later becoming Dallas Transit Company) Reorganization events occurring during his business office tenure included a holding company dissolution and a private utility conversion to a municipal operation, working at a variety of business assignments until being charged with total supervision of all financial and accounting matters. Other Professional Activities : One of the original 20 members of the Urban Mass Transportation Committee that established the Mandated Chart of Accounts Financial Accounting Reporting Elements) . Past Director of the Dallas Chapter of Certified Public Accountants and Past President of the Texas Central Credit Union. 7 - D. QUALIFICATIONS Joe M. Nall and Associates, Inc. , located at 2920 Lemmon Avenue East , Dallas, Texas, 75204, is a Texas Corporation with headquarters and offices in Dallas. Engineering and data processing personnel employed by thefirmhaveexperienceintransportationplanning, engineer- ing, analytical services, and information systems develop- ment. The firm is specially adept in providing utility rate consultation, having conducted numerous studies of utility rates and services for Texas cities and having served as consultant to the Arkansas Public Service Commission in a major gas utility rate matter. In addition, the senior officer of the company has direct experience as a regulatoryagentinTexas. Since its organization in 1970, the firm has developed computer mechanized capability for utility plant aging and pricing analysis with succesful field appli- cation. The firm has knowledge in property valuation , regulatory law and cost of money and has testified relative to these matters before various regulatory bodies. Over the past eight years, Joe M. Nall and Associates , Inc. ,has been actively engaged in utility rate work, which includes : rate analysis, rate design, determination of revenue require- ments, load analysis, load research, and cost analysis. Services include: work for electric, gas , telephone, and water utilities and their customers. We have been involved in the development of techniques used by professional rate consultants throughout the country , a notable one being the development of plant survivors when a continuing propertyrecordisunavailable. The members of our permanent staff have a long history of active involvement in local professional associations and civic affairs, such as; Data Processing Management Associa-tion, National Society of Professional Engineers , NationalAssociationofAccountants, and Dallas Chamber of Commerce. We are active participants in the Public Utility ValuationandRateMakingConferenceheldeachyearatIowaStateUnivvr•:; i Ly , L! ' Ito•gu I :i tor•y Information Systems Conference conducted by the Missouri Public Service Commission , and the Annual Rate Symposium on Problems of the Regulated Industries, also sponsored by the Missouri Public Service Commission. In summary, the firm of Joe M. Nall and Associates , Inc. , can provide services to the City Manager, City of WichitaFalls, in developing a system for analyzing the cost of water service and determining the rates for these services. Unit cost records can be established on the plant in service anddateofactivation. Only the central plant , includingreservoir, transmission and treatment , is recommended for 8 - the continuing property record. The distribution plant costs and vintages will be determined by plant simulation method. Our services will be performed in a professtona1 and ethical manner, and we can work under the City's direction. We emphasize our staff 's complete and well- rounded experience in the engineering and accounting disciplines specifically related to the study of utility service cost and rates in Texas cities. We have per- formed analytical work for other utilities in Texas, and we are currently conducting a cost of service study and review of the water rates proposed for the Customer Cities of Dallas Water Utilities. 9 - 4 E. PROJECT ,WORK SCHEDULE : 1 12 131415161 7181 9110]11112113'141151161171181191 20121122123124125126127128129130131132133134 1 O ' 3 t ©J I O to 2 O 3 0 © © 4 0 4 t 5 O I I © I 6 Q t 7 8 9 10 ICH 11 I w t L) I 13 Legend: 1. Principal Engineer (39. 6 Man Days) 2. Project Supervisor/Data Manager (52. 8 Man Days) 3. Engineer/Analyst (105. 6 Man Days) 4. Examiner (69. 3 Man Days ) 5. Technician (92. 4 Man Days) 6. Surveying/Drafting (52. 8 Man Days) 10 - 25 1979 t F. PROJECT COST Our Property Record Development and Rate Making System Development Proposal addresses itself to several specific areas of determination, and the amount of Consultant 's fee associated to each of the areas include: 1. Inspect and verify the installation dates and unit costs of property in the central plant (reservoir, trans- mission, and treatment ) . $20,160. 2. Arrange central plant data for extension and cost trending on a continuing basis (CPR) . $ 5, 775. 3. From plant balances and additions records, simulate the distribution plant by account to determine the properties ' expected life, average age vintage year, and surviving cost . $12,000. 4. By statistical sampling approach, inspect and verily the survivors of the simulated property of the distribution plant . $10,250. 5. Arrange distribution plant data for extension and cost trending for future revenue deficiency determination. $5,775. 6. Examine and assess the operation, maintenance, and general expenses directly assigned or allocated to the reservoir cost , transmission cost , purification cost , and distribution cost . $7,850. 7. Evaluate and ensure that total rate of return is between floor and ceiling for monetary return. $925. 8. Determine the theoretical reserve for depreciation and evaluate the expected life of each depreciation account.$3, 100. 9. Review the water consumption habits of the consumers by class and determine their cost of service at each functional stage. $3, 975. 10. Prepare the rate making system data for the revenue deficiency determination on a continuing cost basis. $3, 100. 11. Develop a rate structure comparison to clearly define the commodity and capacity charges based on the generally accepted current use maximum day average demand with customer peak hour demand irrespective of the time of day, and show the effects of combining the rate for maximum day and rate for peak excess and the effects of reservoir charge based on future demand. $3,475. 11 - k APR 2 5 1979 12. (As an alternate to No. 1 . ) From plant balances and additions records simulate the central plant by account to determine the properties ' expected life, average age, vintage year and surviving cost , and by statistical sampling approach, inspect and verify the survivors of the simulated property of the central plant. $10,150. 13. (As an alternate to No. 2. ) Arrange the central plant simulated data for extension and cost trending for future revenue deficiency determination. $3,925. The following is a breakdown of project costs by Consultant, level : Percent of Dollars Days Total Time (Base) (Alternate) Principal Engineer 29.6 8.2 10, 360 10, 360 Project Supervisor/ Data Manager 32. 8 9. 0 10, 332 14,550 Examiner/Accountant 66. 0 18.2 18, 480 23,100 Staff Engineer/Analyst 105.6 29.2 18,430 11 ,430 Engineering Technician 75. 7 20. 9 9,543 5,085 Surveying/Drafting 52. 8 14 . 5 9,240 362. 5 . 100. 0 76, 385 64,525 Estimate of directly chargeable expenses - $ 3,820 3,225 TOTALS 80,205 67,750 12 - 41,.. 1.., .4-4,-,,,t,...,--,?., .-:oirsz,,'i, .-: ,:.",-, v4t.i..*,,'4,-..4'..7;-`, .7..,.4.A..t.,,,. .. .,„,v,...,.. c -,.- ... , C .,- .`,; .:::,',, .+., . 47),4,,I.'.. 1d.' '.,4.4;„;,.—,,,t.i,....-',• -•,:- 4..«..f,'t:144414'" "te.t.. 4. 1.,•`*--.1.,,,,ii..W . ;.•.,. .4,..i.,,..i*t.A.t.:Z:4;4,4,--,..'i-1:;,i .1.4e.±.'s,...!-'..-.."--...' i': :.': ,T,' "-.,?,.r;-,1:4''',4'4-''''44:;:V.:.i..".*:''' AV 414',4 ' i v. '. :''',„*.'1 ' - ,.... t .- ''''%.!:;...1' , -14'S-;.-: ' ,,r1,--t.:':;-''''' II-','"". '-.7.70i;.'W;:".*-1 - ':....2- :.'• '' ' ",• ''''':.',:" I'Zi.--1,qte,--V,T...,:i:,.4: 1,,,',4,,,24.4: 4'44,' -.-,,, -t!. .....,i4„...-'f',',-..-?,' ?'.1.-.',*.-,', "--• 14--,1 ,....: ...-..-;.:. 1,',14,1apr':--::,.4:7,4:-'k: '4:: i."" - -::2i'• :-.''...7'....,..;,: ".:1'.,'' "Y2_0'4 e4.''°-1.itei,,'-"6:'! -..,.':. '",4'''Y';''''''ffiAii. 4' '''''' 4 : ''..,0A -.A.--. 4,%-kig.''','';'-'1.T..-J 0E1- M ' NALL/AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,„r4, ,. , .;. ,.. 4-1.;- - i,;'•V..7.,',1".";•-•- i, . 4-. ,..7:.,.. v,,,ip,...,...„,,,,_ ... 0,,.. 1.17.';-.4.,!..;44";71:A!.4 .1FS:•::'btl rg4r,4•.+11f4 ••':4 tif U': j.by:4m,,,(.4.i.: r' S.' ; 4' $04-1414 — ,7,,..-t**Apo-Consul t 1 ng Engineersneers 4.,,......z., ..-5,,O. vg'. = -'''--''.'..-., :‘,..:AV %-...,-. t .....,-, -,,,-:. ,-:,,-46, -,-, . - ,,, 9.., . ,e...-...%:.1,i4. -.C4f-r-?....: y, ..;e,,::,: i, " .* ,,!'!•-•`. -- -4:,ttv..- 1.)-- . 1,q--4;,-;.- 44440;i4C,',; t...,.n.'21t6= c-.-' '..;-.f,';;;):4.4..'1'''''''C::- . ::''':''' ''''''-'.-te;'::-.'4,1':i'''''21',1 ;,.. .4;j4r..','''-' MUNICIPALITY WORK, ORDER4,„40.,1444.'4,$ii,;,....:;:04-..0 .-1,',1,,:,..- 4 rii,,,,,,:_:,. ,,,.. ,,, 4, tolei„,,.. tte,:;e4::_,,:iii..,„.:•.,:4.,.,....„r.,:40,... ...,. .,,,y;.;..,.:„.„,,.. 51t,,,. .,(1 _!,,,,if: :::,,,i,,,7,‘,,zitt,.44,,;it„,ir,..4r,,L., 4;:._,...4% ,.. ,..5,..,.,,i.,?,„., it t4.,,-,_:.,.,.:,.,,7):,,, ,,,,;.4..:,,,q4.,,,,o,,,z,,.,;,,!, , : ,,,,,,,,,,m, , , - ,,,,,,,-.,,y,4....i.,,,It. .,.-,„,,,,,-,4,,,,,,4'.'•-Z,'''1:;- .L.:feW,,e-f...ve '''''',14''''''.:I'V' ,.-.1.;"iiA',!*If.^::':.%:", '. ' -' ' .'." ''...- i5,1; j1.- 7,-,x..1:ilg'‘04',"4. ; il'iffs'r' ' iltS:11'''*2-`f""kN,.4 ' t.ljt4; s 'i' tt 'SP-4,...,'"'. .'1 4'4)- `1.-'''''' '. '''- f' ''. 1;tv, DATE,4 ,,,,W.,,,i. .Aprilt25„,1;1, 7,9,4:44:1'.q.'4;i **':,.,74:e f.j.,:-_:;:i-`,1.;$5,–,,, I., fi, 4k.,..44,,',..,;40-14 ,1,.;::,.;,,,., .,. , ,... A.,,,,,,,,-, .4,„.,,,,g,,,,,, J.4.,:f;-::::.:,,,,,,,,104 -'244.4.tiz.k,:c-.K.,...0.„ -„.\--,,V .:A-,:.-.-,-A',,, ,..p'. '' i, it.„,,,,,,,-'.:04,11,,,,t4',,,,,,,i,;;itp„,44trAtici;10.3,4; -1-..4,4 ,'e,, .',.' itg, ',11,-—I:: .., ,..,,,,,,-,,,.,,,t,...::,,:,,:,,, I.,,,, 4, 4, 43.,..-..,..„. ,,,,(,,.s.''-.;,Kr,,...o', C 1 EN ,'.tsltii.:.i..", .-City o-r Wichita Falls,' Texas '- , 1 ,°,4:11, t-;.v..,t...-,.,..„...,,-.....4c„,.4:,•,*;:.1..r., M- w 41,—,-..z..;ici.,;,.tf,..)...i.k..4.1.,:44'.. ... 4,...... -„.:,,,, .:.f..,..4,....<,-.10....,,,!...,,,=.;>:„.0„:414 .,,,,,...t.: , ., _,., ._,„..-,,, I,:i.,4.„ ,7;.',.. :-,'..:*.... 'W7 ....;.4.4....":n4:- 4-1.444"".;'1,...:, i r.."4.j.'1,4*.44 4''',:,,,,*;it•;,r.f.:,#1...,,,, ...,,,,s0,,. ,.,.•;:rar.*.; '.• 1;1 ' 4- 4. 44:. Fox ':...;-C ity..Managers-, ..,.....,,rit,af...., 0.t v;,,,,,,0„„1I, , :,,,,-...,-,.-, --.- . . , r.-.:‘4:t•4,-.2..,,,-*„1,,,,,t14„,,, ,,,.,,,,„71- „.41......--.. ,,..,...44;.;,.;42::-.,,v,4..i.,iv-y-‘4,N., ... ,,e.4...../..,, 4 4...11i".54i..; l.14,---,i45,,1*,, ,,r-....-....1.04..5 441,1"....,-,i,A !..1.....- :'-',,..--,..-.=,- 1. .4.' --s.-q.'.. ..,,, -- - ,..\.. i.-, .-.;.,-,,..-....,A, , 41,1;0.1., x-440 ,, ,,.1,..4.,,,,, 4..4: i' \; t.:il-i':.'ADD:ES' 54::. i-4,'.i'.,..,4.'i'o' lli-$.P.'''''0.'!'B o x-:1431;c' .''''--'''''''::--' ' .'i-- si,'(:,,‘`'''''tci...'"4,:,-..4; 4.-.40,115:4.,;Z.;',..";,,: 1, 1,;`"?;" 4viiN5;,.\, r,:,., 5-,i*,-;;:i.-1,12:',7,..?....iili.„ i1- 1;. :*!:7.4-''.1..,,'....,;:= 4*,,,,.'''4.4 Wichi ta':Fa 1.15, Texas- 76 9 7:,,i ..''-. i•' -.-....N., 7.‘ `s44,t. '..-;:.4-7,' ''‘'. 02,0 -at.,,,,.',,a 4 ,..k.--, :;,-,i,,,..';'&74&,:v,;,'2 -,..,1v:m/v-,,, ,;,,, ,,,:-.. :t.-;s',;-.: :',: :::' T: .",'` ,.: .:-A.4..t..1?„P,Ve,,:s . t" V,04V-.6.:RO E.T.,V,V4 rk 1:!....:De'v e'-lo me n t of'''..Rate' frid ki,ri).9 .-sx4n1 mNJ4c)j,,,:-....„piio.,:;;....,.07it„.7„.9-w.,,G,: it:1,::::,..:Fpoi..,i_34, 44,4''.4'‘. 54'.;'''''''*:t'S''''''t`'.a nd TroDerti;Record ti4-!--4 ,•-:..-;*•'.1:4-t-;443- t f!ett,&tt,',P,i'-4'‘.:-E,":,2"`;::,`4'7,..-..*,-' '-,,•. ."Ic't'„,lt..:.;.-:--41-J-5,,;.;s14•,..f;",:%ft-' ,,--.,4•,-', i!,..'--.ri-''.,4.t''.,,,i,%,,,-... ..,:.,447,-,:.1.:,r;‘,',..' s;;,tz-,,,,,,..4.4K" z'-e,.." 4`..;*zi-1.016."‘"':40---4.4.-1. ;'-'''.4.4-•.*.. r'4'''.- '14eVik.' jkii4,,,-:eil:•';.:::. ,d.'4,,,-)., ;.',.t.*,IF'''i4;:f*A'. ,--,i,,jt} 1::;,',,s':;:,,,,,,_:,;.;.;:'. ;.-4*,...":7'..x, ,....) ,..;-„:21 4.4.A4-;,-.. -.'''''.:'4,-V44*r., '4131.j".-. •10.1 ,41.,-"Zr''' 4. ::-.4.,,V,V= '''- -", ir0,14tir,:::'!:::',`i.t:-,'Ii4-: -:t;','''#;,:i1,,,.;, i4.';:--*i'''',..ra . 421... '.4 i-;;•; ,•` • ,,-.., st,'a, ,,,,,:*,--,.).,W;,iw..f4t' ".1.:-.....$4-ontre. 0".1.,6 AC' '''.',.,:ti tlt, —,°'4*.4.-',',,;Q?I+ . i." ZA.'';'''.' .'!'''6,CO il E:OF' ERV I CESs,:.:....f4.,-..t,N,,..-4;,, k4,11,-,,,,,v,,•:c.t,,,Ir.,.!:..;..;‘,..i..,,,,-,...,?...,:: -.!;,; fi,,!..._..,,,,,„,,r,,,.,,,,,,, ,,,:,o ,„. 1,c te 4-:.,,,:•"10,tiAf't...' ,-... '... 4 ' .til*V j;, 147 t! '' ..;' ' ” . , 7: 4`.."-..., k.:1' :Nrt. r-, .1,, - .--.a. ° .'"5 LI' 72''';1.' ' '' ' Hi• ' Falls1 ' analyzing the Wa ter ATI-, 4.-,,-,.,t.,..., .,,A•4--...!,3,:4,10-"provide expert assistance to.: the, City of Wic _ita , a s ini-..;,-,-.:. • .,,,' Operations for the determination of the'service' cost, -the recommendations'.for'adequaegi,,,., sp-'4:'''-'-ra tes'to.'recover'the, cost by function,- the development..,-:ot , cvontiru14nugf, z4faotte mak.:,147,gt.,,,,,4,,,":".,% e-.:.:,..,,,,..,,,,4, 44,,,,,..:.ding'ofciplane:surviyors:-..bp-..account. kt,,,, .t. ..y...,.,?......,,:t.A. , .,,,,,..„,...,„„ e-.4 ,1,,n,„, .„ ..;,.. ...._-_, ,.: ,.....:. ,„.....,,,,-..,,,... , . 0,-,2 - 72 :.,,re• 0 4r.„.1:Z";, x,-.”......'ff':i,-*--,..-54-w-F-i... . .7:r 7.:.:t. , .-0.0, .. 4i,;- "'=....., -1 - ..; ,,-.. f -,.. ,,, 4 -- c.i.? ,...- ..f..-1-:. ..,.....-',' ‘'. 4,y . --,- - . 0 0 42' l'Ic't';':',KIV"..":"'•t.•,;;;•:.T h e s e e r v i c e s:'are't&",b e p r o v i d e d;.at the direction of the City Manager and shall-4441,riN'!‘4i ncfudeAbut" not be limited to:'-'Analyses of the -Water Plant 'investment and operations;.-, ,,,.. 2,..",i''-...forl,the" determination of the proper',adjusted value rate base, ratetstructure, rey:enue..,1, requirements,,.revenueexpectations, operatingexpenses i•-..'.al location of expenses, sery icesi4urn shed-..to the 4;01,,.. .:.,',„„ i'. t n'ofstinvestment ,and :capi tal .t'requi remen,tfOrk w,4*( 7j,i, !-,,.. ,.f. ,. ,..,„:„ liy,.;.4..,',.•,..%::..- ki,,,,, -K., J., , Wicnire , u r ,-... ir-z'.',A,....'4.---Y"---'-i-''.'''',- Viie,-..-`4.."-: .,..,-•,.:,- . ta-ral 1 s'-ton s ume rs:,,,,..r',.---71z,q,,.;'''';.'---,,..'I= ,..';-.`..' 41...- '.....6;' 4elliTi1f - •: --.'• --•-,f,. -•,,,-;:,-11.,;:,,„.'‘:.:-, 0,--,1•1 i.. +-- - ., , --fl'...r.n* ..'' e.". 1 ':-' '''VIS''.111.r. ',.`..',,--(:''' ....'.'3)l!-- ,' 4 ft- -$-•':. t-zftlft,:070,The Consul ting.:,Engineer's findings and recommendations shall be-set forth in a m4,!:,,written letter-type report,with organized data .to the City of Wichita' Falls within a.-- ;-''''';'''•-,-,. x..„ ..4.,;' reasonable period of ,time, not to exceed, eight months after all1 necessary underlying 1..,.;, ...„... 1..::-,--,-- records,.."documents'and other': information have been..-.revl.ewed,'.i.apd,,th.7.:.!.P1ank.';.inYent00: 1rled.. 1.',.'_,,Sc,'„,,,-t ,,,....i..-,,,,,,,,--,...,,,'..',;.,••?,=',4,..,,;Li.'-'- ,, V.1 i.., ,::,„. ' f 1,- , -,,,4,4 v=k,•'.-,..1..',e, 'I ,i,r",,s,, d 1 1 at cr.b the Consul tant-it-X-tA,v.--,...;:.,,, :-- ,,,,..-,,,,-t,,,,,,,------,-.5A:..t.-s.- ilai,--a n- id lk,4,11,11U, e „, Y t,...,,,,,,, ,,,,.. .--::t,,,-,.,-;t..,,,;Y:- .-,$: v,---:,:;,:-•,imxr,A,T.V-A-:",.; -,..x...ii,.t.,-,/s. •',.. : ''-.' '.:...:::' .-- 1*-t''',:.*:.°1*-x.‘74-'-'ri.''.*•-?,".1'' ' ' '','!„.--. - <'::-:, ' ' --< 141:2,v..,04--;:7-„,-.--•,i-'...n4A z1. 4::-..,,,tz.-..,‘,.....4„4,:;;;,. .,,,,.;ii:;.,,,,.. i ,-i".BI L ..ING.',AN DA c cou NT 1 N G ii DATA;:-' 11..E;14, 1,,`.C.,,.17,,,-'-.-:.!:';z4.1;',i'''.1i7.-:-4-VH„ .;: -;-:,:f.,,tv.,-.-!;:eli '',.*.-,4'.--',.','-';',,,V4";.,'..'..":1',,,',', :,',,,,,1, . ,,,,,' y.'; '' ",,-,''',f. •,,,,,,A*41-2:011i,1;. v.-,.,. ,...... i) if _ " 2-I ..*,. -.., . d.,. Inc 5%,,:id.x.:,.,..i.s,,,:;.;.:. 4t_ ,-., ..,...,.... ..,,IFor sery i ces-rendered,- the Client shall pay xJoe M. Nall and Associates,1,*; Consulting-Engineers, ''upon submission of monthly- invoices, an amount equal to the v1.,,.. actual hours of services 'furnished multiplied by the product of the Consulting Engineer.:,'s 4 1 establishedS:hourly `sal ary-cost, this expense shall come from current revenue or,,,,,srpp-,....,,,,...,taxes-Twh i c hi.-..the'municipality-agreescipa1ity;';',agrees.' to,..,levy for the purpose of paylpg„Lthe.,',,...same Infa ddlt ion;-the Cl i ent2shall' reimburse the Consulting En g ineereach.-month,1,:at,,,;L:41n .;-'''''..;t:1--'.costfor,..-a1 l''.-•.out-of-pockettof.-.'poc ket:expensesses directlyrectly, 1_, rgeab1 e to the work'T.-;.:44i,,,--.‘"",..: i,.-'-,1,,,,, k.‘7,..;;'.,„.,:,...:::: 1:i,,z.,.!, t7Ny. , .'-.' - - .. . ' . 7,!.. . The service b i 11 ing,s-!,-;oltthe!,Consur,ltingEn,.g.,,ineer-7, ,,,.. w11;1.:-..,berers„.,-F4cte,..d ,toa _,,,..,..,.,:.",‘„,,,.,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,••-.4::,.....;,. i.,.:,-;,:,!!•.,.-maximum o f480,205:00.. •.,'',v',,--.-,,...,-7'''..,,,'"'-'.;;',...-"-.!:,-;.,'',...;.:,..-,-..,- t.; : '.,,-- - -- '1,444.)4.r,,---",.: e;-:-..;11.,APPROVED FORI;.:?.Ci ty-7of Wichita„:..;.Fal1„..st. i, ,4,144.--;,,..:„...AIIROV,Eat;FOR ,;4: ,-:.;:- JrMtiv11,18( i....Asisoc11140,?;74Ir?1.-._;i:,..k,- --,46.4- 4 4,-`‘;`,4,,,. ' '-,-"-,,,Ahi„..' -;!.«,e..,'!''''',--7,-..V.:".•,?-;•tif-..-',-.''-'-'.----I---,',,,':$-/ -174,74R-i'','',0.-.:;:?.--.•',',..:-.?'".,--•',-, i44, ., •'?".;;;cp:k•,,,:,•,•‘ t,.....f,t,..--- ''''' A 4,....';', ,':8`,A,Z-li.-.1't.. r‘-r, ' -''I':' '---:-1' ' ' '.= '''‘''7-*';'''' 5.1--'' •-•' - ' ) '' ' 1:4'71''''-''''''' .''. k.'' ' 4'14i:rv'':D ''' J'''',!.''''''''''':•f,'.',1.7t47'444',';::: DY:; ti-0.,i ' - • 7' 1'74. '''.::":.-5.';'-*Ti t 1 e:,';'.. President lirtz''.3:', ';/,,'?%.i-;.'.'-:f;4,1-;‘,•'.f,'.',..-,etl,;..-:.",' ::;...;.:--.x\-.0...A.-..-.1,-;,-:---,- -e,,,..-4- ,,,,-1 .,..,ti: 'I-A'i'..V-'," '-';."•0 1-0 t .-4*-.4.,"4K.4,1,:X.,.„..--- j..1.44,;-•cl-;.;.:Ci:q:'.1 ,,,•.,;41.?,.:1-44--;....F.',.-a „--,..,-;,.,, .,, 141iFf-"''''',,,.!:'/..,..,-.-. ::'-,-,z.V ,V,:.::,....'.7.., - ! Ar-4,-- .-.t.J*.,:.,, ,-,..0,ti--A.,,,,t,-•,,mti''',r11,,,„ t'-',iisalgar -i.:4tA13$411-,.. F,:gl.i.;.-:‘,k-- :-.'14.,";--1.:ilt,:... • q....1„„..„.-.,,.,,,,-,,,. • ,' ..„-_,.-.---,t,...-1.,p .„..;,.T,...14•,,d,...1",4,!„-,'-'-,:-„,,,...-tA7',i. i..:-.4k,-"s.,.L'-:-,-.1,1.---..,-,,,,,Ast.,44.-,4:: ,A,,---k,-;',..,44,,,1-,.--,-.•,...,1,4s,,,,,.4,,,,,. .,,,,,,,,,,.-„,.., DateA*, k.,;;:fpr;;AY ft. ''., 11....4 4..4Tie....'''..,t.''1.tir.";.,•,.. ir'",;- Ye,'",iy.,..1'''r.Ip-;,..t,,,,,,4%.„-:,.....,:,.....,,-..-...---,.:1.:,4--,....,.L.,-,,...4N§';:, ' 4..e.„.1t.4..,..v-,,-'t,n,.., rv-1,4PAt.V4:::,-3.-7,,,,„.,,,.."'ca;44. 674:0,-,:``-'..,. ..-,:-‘'4-:-.-1,.„.....-).4.1.,..,,,,,,,,,..:,...: : .r.,-4w,,,,,;.,)„,,,,;-A-:,.4.:j ‘,....., ':.-±....:,...,.:,.:1.,..i.t..."er;_...;::,.,,';';'..,,tt.'..;,•! ..,4..,-.744-;:-;, ',..;i:-:,..41P,:,q....kEi?".'i.. 4,v'. ',,,:.174.":1. .,:,, :-..;-;‘,.47.,--,:::,;:irt:A1,4,•:,',;.;.1):: 3. k"q':',77.t' iRW"::';;`-ft.s,,i;i7t-ti.i.'itel.!,;2'.-'4,..`-.,'.ii*‘%-vi..44t.-:".4,.iite:1,-.1.tr:1-.X.;e-..::.4-4;;"4.1,-..i.‘',:-.:<:,T,-V. -.-4"p, *7 itv.i.det,;:i.71-prk.,..,-r-4.f.Ti,....,--..t ' VII --. '"?".0. -":.1.-, ..,.1'443--k.-4,4.#.4--..4--11^,.1-4..-4,44, .,,,,,„:-,,,, ,. .,...' ,,,, ,„ ,., 1, , ,,,s.,,,,,:„: 14,4,4,,,?4„,,M,X.,4*:-.4,Ce"4''..4.1t -..:.' t',1%44'17 ' r''''''''' ' '''' 4,>, ..4',"'. - . .4.j''i. 4' 1.0 -.4(k/W4,..4, 1 T i'l ''t' I»k .,-A: rt „:,-,,--,,,,,. Aftr*:-,ft .•,,..0.,, , .4.,..i, :,.-_-',..,1,,ftft -. - ... ft '." ' — ' t.,',,,,,,,vt..A : ,-,-..',...:" ..,,,:s.„..,-,,,.,,,I.,,,,;:.:.,..,i, 4.,.,„4.„,,,,,,..,,,,,,.0.: :., ,, „A,;,,;;;..i.., ;..‘mv..,.. - .., • ,- .-.,. -.-- - -to APR 2 5 1V JOE M. NALL & ASSOCIATES , INC. F E E S C HED U L E October 1, 1977 Principal Engineer 50.00 per hour Data Systems Consultant 45.00 " " Managing Examiner 45.00 Senior Engineer 40.00 " " Senior Examiner 40.00 " " Data Manager 40.00 " " Engineer 30.00 " " Examiner 30.00 " " Associate Engineer 25.00 " " Senior Engineering Technician 25.00 " " Senior Data Processing Technician 25.00 " " Junior Engineer 20.00 " " Engineering Technician 18.00 " " Data Processing Technician 18.00 " " Associate Engineering Technician 15.00 " " Associate Data Processing Technician 15.00 Junior Engineering Technician 12.50 " " Junior Data Processing Technician 12.50 " " Steno-Typist 11.50 " " Other qualified personnel as needed.