Loading...
Res 001-86 1/7/1986RESOLUTION NO. /-'41(; RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPRAISAL OF PARCELS 70 , #71, AND #72 FOR THE HOLLIDAY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENI' PROJECT, SETTING JUST COMPENSATION, AND AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION. WHEREAS, it is necessary to acquire the hereinafter described property, known as Parcels #70 , #71, and #72 , for the excavation of Holliday Creek; and, WHEREAS , such property has been appraised by an independent appraiser employed by the City of Wichita Falls , and the appraisal has been reviewed by the Property Administrator and is now on file in the Property Management Office . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS , TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 . The legal descriptions of the right-of-way parcels to be acquired in fee simple title are as follows : Parcel No . 70 Lot 3, Tract 1, Holliday Tracts, Block 1-A, of John A. Scott Survey No . 7 Parcel No . 71 Lot 2 , Tract 1, Holliday Tracts, Block 1-A, of John A. Scott Survey No . 7 Parcel No . 72 Lot 1, Tract 1, Holliday Tracts, Block 1-A, of John A. Scott Survey No . 7 SECTION 2 . The amount of just compensation for Parcels 70 , 71, and 72 is set at $38 , 333 .00 , which is also the fair market value determined by a real estate appraiser employed by the City of Wichita Falls. The City Manager is hereby authorized to acquire the above-described parcels in fee simple title in the name of the City of Wichita Falls . SECTION 3 . In the event that the City Manager is unable to purchase such parcels for the appraised value, he is authorized to increase the offer when, in his judgment, it appears to be in the best interest of the City to do so to save the cost of condemnation. If both parties are unable to agree on a value for the property, the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause to be instituted condemnation proceedings to obtain such property in the name of the City of Wichita Falls for the Holliday Creek Channel Improvement Project. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of January, 1985 . 72:2-::'Y ATTEST: v City Clerk