MPO TPC/TAC Board Minutes - 10/02/2013 •
WICHITA FALLS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
Technical Advisory Committee
Minutes
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Voting Members Present: RECEIVED IN
Lin Barnett, Wichita Falls MPO, MPO Director, TAC Chairperson CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Danny Brown, TxDOT, Director of TP&D DATE:
David Rohmer, TxDOT, Area Engineer
Davis Powell, City of Wichita Falls, City Engineer BY; .d TIME. z.ZJ`0N/
Karen Montgomery-Gagne, City of Wichita Falls, Planning Administrator
Mark Beauchamp, City of Wichita Falls, Traffic Superintendent
MPO Staff:
Jaimie Lee, Wichita Falls MPO, Transportation Planner I
Visitors:
Mark McBurnett, Civil Engineer, SAFB 82 CES
Mike Beaver, TxDOT, Engineer
Tammy Marlow, TxDOT, North Region Support Center
Jeffrey Gordon, Crane West, Programmer
Absent
Kevin Hugman-City of Wichita Falls, ACM/Director of Community Development
Allan Moore, TxDOT, Director of Construction
Tim Hertel-TxDOT, Director of Operations
I. Welcome & Introduction
Mr. Barnett, the TAC chairperson, called the meeting to order at 9:34 a.m. and
welcomed everyone in attendance.
II. Public Comment on Agenda and Non-Agenda Items
Mr. Barnett asked for any public comments on agenda and non-agenda items. There
were none.
III. Review and Approval of the July 3, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee's (TAC)
Meeting Minutes
Mr. Barnett asked for any comments or corrections to the July 3, 2013 minutes. There
were none. He then asked for a motion to approve the minutes. Mrs. Montgomery-
Gagne made the motion to approve. Mr. Brown seconded the motion, which passed
unanimously.
Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting October 2, 2013 Page 1 of 5
IV. Review and Comment Regarding the July 17, 2013 Transportation Policy
Committee's (TPC's) Meeting Minutes— No Action Required
Mr. Barnett asked for comments on the July 17, 2013 TPC meeting minutes. None were
received. The committee moved on to the next agenda item.
V. Crane West Presentation of the Long-Range Project Readiness Plan Survey Tool
Mr. Jeff Gordon, Programmer with Crane West, presented the Long-Range Project
Readiness Plan project-scoring tool to the TAC committee for review, comment, and
questions. He stated this was a presentation of the draft tool and would make changes
based on TAC recommendations. Mr. Gordon provided the TAC board members with a
demonstration of how the tool functions. He stated each TAC member would receive an
email with a unique, encrypted URL directing him or her to a specific project. When the
TAC board member clicks the URL, a web page where they can rank each project
opens. After the TAC board member ranks a criterion, the box will turn green and
progress will automatically save. When the TAC member reaches the bottom of the
criteria page, they can press the "Next Project" button, which will advance them to the
next project on their list.
The TAC committee recommended locking out all of the pre-scored criteria for each
project so that the TAC board member would know to disregard those ranked criteria
and move on to the next criterion in the project. Mr. Gordon stated he would do this by
shading the criterion box a darker shade of grey to differentiate the pre-scored criteria
from the remaining criteria needing ranking. A second recommendation was to add a link
that would open up a separate window so users could email comments regarding that
specific project for use later in the vetting process. Essentially, this will act as a "flag" so
that MPO staff can generate project advocacy charts for each project at the project-
vetting meeting.
Mr. Gordon stated that he enabled the survey tool with a responsive design so that
members can rank their projects on any web platform via a desktop computer, tablet, or
smart phone. Mr. Barnett asked for any other suggestions or questions about the project
ranking process. Receiving none, he moved on to the next agenda item.
VI. Establish the Deadline for TAC Board Members to Rank the Long-Range Project
Readiness Plan Projects and Schedule the TAC Project Vetting Meeting.
Mr. Barnett, in concurrence with the TAC committee, established a deadline for the TAC
board members to rank the Long-Range Project Readiness Plan projects and schedule
the TAC project-vetting meeting. The deadline to have the projects ranked was October
14, 2013. The project-vetting meeting was October 17, 2013 from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
VII. Review and Recommendation to Approve Amendments to the 2010-2035
Metropolitan Transportation Plan Project List for October 2013
Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to the enclosed 2010-2035 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan project list for October 2013. He explained that changes to the MTP
project list included listing TxDOT short-range projects to show only the first four years of
fiscally constrained projects as indicated by the TxDOT Unified Transportation Program.
Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting October 2, 2013 Page 2 of 5
TxDOT's Unified Transportation Program (UTP) covers a 10-year list of projects, but
provides identified funding for only the first four years of the program. MPO staff
identified TxDOT's long-range 2021-2035 projects as fiscally constrained with planning
funds based on the final six years of the current TxDOT UTP. Any projects listed after
2035 are placed into the long-range un-met needs schedule where, if a future UTP
identifies available funding, the project can move up into the 2021-2035 Long-Range or
2010-2020 Short-Range project list.
Mr. Barnett asked for any comments or questions regarding the 2010-2035 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan project list. Mr. Beauchamp noticed an error in the City of Wichita
Falls Long-Range Un-Met needs schedule of three safety projects listed as city projects.
Mr. Beauchamp stated MPO staff should list them as TxDOT projects because they are
on TxDOT's system.
Mr. Barnett asked for any other comments. Receiving none, he asked for a motion to
forward the MTP project list to the Policy Board, with revisions. Mr. Beauchamp made
the motion to approve the document. Mr. Brown seconded the motion, which passed
unanimously.
VIII. Review of the Administrative Revisions to the 2014-2015 Unified Planning Work
Program
Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to page 23 of the meeting packet. He
explained that he received notification from our partners at the TxDOT North Region
Support Center (NRSC) that our 2014-2015 Unified Planning Work Program received
FHWA approval upon first review. Mr. Barnett went over the administrative revisions in
the 2013-2015 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) with the TAC committee.
Revisions included adding a disclaimer to the front of the document, adding information
about the transportation reauthorization laws in the introduction, and updating the
Definition of Area in Section B. Mr. Barnett informed the committee that the
administrative revisions did not require approval because there was no change in scope
of work or in financing any of the Subtasks. He stated Item VIII was for informational
purposes only.
Mr. Barnett asked for any questions regarding the administrative revisions to the 2014-
2015 Unified Planning Work Program. Receiving none, he moved on to the next agenda
item.
IX. Review of the Administrative Revisions to Section VI — Federally Funded Transit
Projects of the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement Program
Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to page 28 of the meeting packet. He
stated the revisions included a notification from the Federal Transit Administration
regarding the actual funding amounts available for the programming of the FY 2013
annual transit-operating grant. Mr. Barnett stated the grant was currently in the process
of creation and was awaiting approval of a Texas Transportation Commission Minute
Order concerning a request for Transportation Development Credits. With that, and
approval from FTA, the City of Wichita Falls manager can execute the transit grant.
Mr. Barnett asked for any questions regarding the administrative revisions to Section VI
— Federally Funded Transit Projects for the 2013-2016 Transportation Improvement
Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting October 2, 2013 Page 3 of 5
Program. Mr. Barnett informed the committee that the administrative revisions did not
require approval because there was not a 25% increase or decrease in FTA funding the
City of Wichita Falls will receive. He stated Item IX was for informational purposes only.
Receiving no further comment, he moved on to the next agenda item.
X. Other Business:
A. Discussion & Overview of Progress on Local Transportation Projects-City and
TxDOT staff (Quarterly Review)
TxDOT Report: Mr. Rohmer reported that construction of the US 82/287 Windthorst
Road Bridge was complete and open. He reported that a mill and overlay project on SH
240 near Missile Road to the Wichita River was complete. Projects on IH 44 and US 82
near Maurine Street, Windthorst Road, and McNeil Avenue would receive a Dynamic
Message Sign, which meant the signs would upgrade to LED lighting for more visibility.
He stated the signs were currently in procurement because of a delay in materials. Mr.
Rohmer reported on three Safe Routes to School projects that were complete and in the
cleanup phase of the project. The State Highway 79/Professional Drive project has been
awarded and will have a preconstruction meeting on October 17. Lastly, he reported that
US 82/287 Galveston to McKinney Road, awarded to the Zack Burkett Co., would
receive a mill and overlay. That project should begin construction next spring.
City Report: Mr. Powell reported the 2013 Street Rehab Project from Rhea Road, Kemp
Street, and McNeil was 60% complete. He stated Kemp Street was currently under
construction. Cherokee Drainage Improvements Project, awarded to A&M Construction,
was 20% complete. Mr. Powell reported on the 2013 Holliday Rd/30th Box Culvert Demo
project for demolition of triple box culverts and construction of 24" storm sewer pipes.
Moffett Sewer Rehab was awarded October 1 and should begin in November. The
McNiel drainage project should begin construction in July of 2014.
B. MPO Quarterly Financial Report (3rd Quarter FY 2013-April, May, June)
Mr. Barnett reported on the third quarter expenses for the MPO. He stated that the
MPO had spent 65.91% of its allocation for FY 2013.
Mr. Barnett asked for any other questions or comments about the third quarter
report. Receiving none, he moved on to the next agenda item.
C. Grouped TxDOT CSJ Projects Report
Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to page 43 of the TAC meeting packet
and asked Ms. Lee to give her report. Ms. Lee reported to the committee that MPO
staff did not add any new projects to the Grouped TxDOT CSJ Project report for this
quarter. However, a few old projects had been removed from the list. Mr. Barnett
asked for any comments to the Grouped TxDOT CSJ project report. Receiving none,
he moved on to the next agenda item.
D. MPO Director's Report: Transit Oriented Development Study(p. 44)
Mr. Barnett informed the TAC committee that Freese and Nichols (FNI) reviewed
data provided by WFMPO and began creating maps in GIS. Freese and Nichols
Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting October 2,2013 Page 4 of 5
packaged written descriptions with the maps and sent them out to the WFMPO for
initial reviews and comments. FNI conducted a City demographic profile for baseline
analysis and gathered information from US census and American Community
Surveys that included historic populations, growth charts, compound growth rates,
race and ethnicity, age distribution, education attainment, incomes, commute times,
household types, housing types, and employment industry. Mr. Barnett stated
WFMPO will continue with monthly conference calls to review progress of work.
E. Other Items — FHWA Workshop on MAP-21 Performance-Based Planning (p.
45)
Mr. Barnett informed the committee that MPO staff would attend the FHWA
sponsored workshop on Performance-Based Planning down in Austin on November
131h. He stated Performance-Based Planning would become crucial to the next
phase of transportation planning.
XI. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 11:40 a.m.
Ada
Irvan F. "Lin" Barnett Jr.
MPO Transportation Planning l irector
Wichita Falls MPO
Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting October 2, 2013 Page 5 of 5