AGD 03/03/2026 �.);C4i� City of Wichita Falls
T E X Ars City Council Agenda
NueSieS:4olderkOpp turuties
Notice is hereby given that on March 3, 2026, the City Council of the City of Wichita
Falls will hold a regular meeting at 8:30 a.m. at the MPEC, 1000 Fifth Street, Hayley Eye
Clinic Seminar Room, for the purpose of considering the following items:
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
a) Pastor Craig Lile, Faith Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Presentations
a) Employee of the Month - Michael Graddy, Fire Department
b) Proclamation - Women's History Month, Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture
c) Proclamation - March for Meals Month, Meals on Wheels Wichita County
5. Citizen Comments
Citizens may speak on matters not listed on the agenda by signing up before the
meeting. Remarks are limited to three minutes, and no deliberation or action may be
taken by the Council.
CONSENT AGENDA
6. Approval of Meeting Minutes
a) City Council Meeting February 17, 2026
7. Receive Minutes
a) Employee Benefits Trust Board September 24, 2025
b) Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation November 6, 2025
c) Landmark Commission November 18, 2025
d) Tax Increment Financing Board #3 December 16, 2025
e) Landmark Commission December 16, 2025
f) Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation January 8, 2026
g) Lake Wichita Revitalization Committee January 13, 2026
h) Tax Increment Financing District #3 January 15, 2026
8. Ordinances
a) Ordinance abandoning and vacating a storm water detention facility located at
3014 Seymour Road.
9. Resolutions
a) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services
agreement with Joseph A. Ross, Architect Inc. for architectural and engineering
services, for the Hamilton Park Tennis Center renovation project.
REGULAR AGENDA
10. Staff Reports
a) City Manager's Update - Art Walk and Employee Appreciation Week
b) Annual Castaway Cove Update
c) Council Meeting Streaming Update
11. Other Council Matters
a) Announcements concerning items of community interest from members of the City
Council. No action will be taken or discussed.
12. Executive Sessions
a) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code § 551 .087, to
discuss or deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business
prospect that the City Council seeks to have, locate, stay, or expand in or near the
territory of the City of Wichita Falls and with which the City and/or economic
development corporations created by the City are conducting economic
development negotiations (including, but not limited to, City Art Walk and Bell
Street)
b) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code §551 .071 ,
consultation with attorney on matters involving pending or contemplated litigation
or other matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under
the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas
clearly conflicts with the Texas Open Meetings Act (including, but not limited to,
consultation with City Attorney ).
13. Adjourn
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this facility is wheelchair accessible, and accessible
parking spaces are available. If you require special accommodations to attend or participate in this meeting,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at (940) 761-7409 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
This meeting can be accessed and viewed at the following locations:
1. A livestream will be shown on the Spectrum/Time Warner Cable Channel 1300
City Council Agenda
Page 2 of 3
2. A livestream will be shown on the City's webpage http://www.wichitafallstx.gov/994/Council-
Meetings-and-Agendas
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the Wichita Falls
Public Library, Wichita Falls, Texas on the 25th day of February, 2026, at 3:30 o'clock p.m.
City Clerk
City Council Agenda
Page 3 of 3
City of Wichita Falls
Ak4/4 �SCity Council Meeting Minutes
a February17, 2026
TEXAS
Sic Skies 4o-/derk.Cppa-rtemMes
. Call to Order
The City Council of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, met in a regular session on the
above date in the Seminar Room at the MPEC with the following members present.
Present: Mayor Tim Short
At-Large Austin Cobb
District 1 Whitney Flack
District 2 Robert Brooks
District 3 Jeff Browning
District 4/Mayor Pro Tem Mike Battaglino
District 5 Tom Taylor
Absent:
Mayor Short called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m.
2. Invocation
Pastor Gene Holley, Life Church, gave the invocation.
3. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Short led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. Presentations
a) Recognition of Foreign Exchange Students - Dave Clark
Dave Clark introduced and recognized foreign exchange students living in Wichita Falls.
Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager, announced that no discussion or action would
occur on Item 10A. He advised that any individuals wishing to address the item may do
so during Citizen Comments. The applicants withdrew their request after the agenda was
posted and plan to resubmit at a later date with restrictions limiting the use to a data
center.
Mayor Short acknowledged community concerns regarding the ongoing investigation
and the inability to release the body-worn camera footage at this time, stating the
Council shares the public's frustration. He reported that the City has initiated a
comprehensive review of policies and procedures, including mental health response,
City Council Minutes
February 17, 2026
Page 1 of 6
Page 4 of 53
supervisory practices, training, and accountability, with assistance from the Helen
Farabee Centers, and that updates are being posted on the City's website. He also
noted the implementation of FlashVote to enhance public engagement and affirmed the
City's commitment to continue this work and remain transparent.
5. Citizen Comments
Jack Browne, citizen and Planning and Zoning Commission member, spoke in support of
pursuing data center development, citing the city's available land, utility infrastructure,
water supply, and potential economic and infrastructure benefits. He also commented on
the role of artificial intelligence in driving industry growth and noted that modern facilities
use closed-loop cooling systems with limited ongoing water demand.
Stephanie Harris spoke about the Victoria Lang incident and expressed concern about
police accountability, the delay in making the matter public, and the need to release body
camera footage. She stated that while mental health training is important, the primary
issue is officer conduct and oversight, and called for stronger measures to address
excessive force and for charges to be pursued against the officers involved.
Sonja Calliste, family and psychiatric nurse practitioner, addressed the Council regarding
the Victoria Lang incident and expressed concerns about the lack of documentation of a
welfare check, a mental health assessment, and de-escalation measures, as well as the
absence of a female officer at the scene. She questioned the depth of officer training,
psychological screening, and ongoing competency evaluations, and emphasized the
potential harm such encounters can have on individuals with mental illness. She urged
the City to ensure a thorough investigation, accountability if misconduct is substantiated,
and stronger policies prioritizing mental health awareness, assessment, and de-
escalation.
Sandra Gross spoke about the 2026 Martin Luther King Multicultural Parade and Black
History Month events. She expressed appreciation for the City's past support of the MLK
prayer breakfast and Juneteenth and requested similar visible partnership for the parade,
including the use of the City stage at 8th and Scott on February 21st from 1 :00 p.m. to
4:00 p.m.
Crystal Washington spoke about the Victoria Lang incident and expressed concerns
about police accountability, disciplinary practices, and what she described as over
policing in certain areas of the city. She called for criminal charges against the former
officers involved and emphasized the broader impact of law enforcement actions on
families and youth in the community.
Michael Damron addressed the Council, shared personal reflections on his experiences
working in Texas, expressed general support for law enforcement and the principles of
justice, and requested consideration for assistance.
John Hutchinson addressed the Council regarding the Victoria Lang incident and
criticized City leadership for what he described as a lack of transparency and delayed
City Council Minutes
February 17, 2026
Page 2 of 6
Page 5 of 53
release of body camera footage. He called for immediate accountability and stated that
the matter would remain a community and election issue until further action is taken.
Robert Mitchell spoke about the Victoria Lang incident and expressed concerns about
the Police Department's and City Council's handling of the matter. He alleged a lack of
accountability, questioned the acceptance of an officer's resignation, raised concerns
about Internal Affairs complaint investigations, and stated that the situation could result in
a significant financial impact to the City. He also voiced support for Councilor Brooks and
opposed what he described as efforts to exclude him from participation.
Valerie Rhodes addressed the Council regarding the proposed data center development,
stating she supports the potential for economic growth, job creation, and infrastructure
improvements in the area. She also expressed concerns about the concentration of
industrial uses near her neighborhood and the impacts on minority communities, and
requested consideration of mitigation measures such as sound and physical barriers,
lighting controls, performance standards, and improved maintenance of surrounding
infrastructure.
Mark Calvano, a developer from San Francisco, spoke regarding solar development and
data centers. He requested consideration of a zoning overlay to allow property owners to
develop solar projects without individual zoning changes, stating this could generate
private investment, jobs, electricity, and support future data center growth. He also
commented on the importance of diversifying the local economy, the advantages Texas
has for data center development, and noted that newer facilities use closed-loop or
water-free cooling technologies.
Consent Agenda — Items 6 - 9
Moved by Councilor Battaglino to approve the Consent Agenda.
The motion was seconded by Councilor Taylor and, with no comments or questions
from the public, carried by the following vote:
AYES: Mayor Short, Councilor Cobb, Councilor Flack, Councilor Brooks,
Councilor Browning, Councilor Battaglino, Councilor Taylor
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
6. Approval of Meeting Minutes
a) City Council Meeting February 3, 2026.
7. Receive Minutes
a) Homeless Advisory Committee September 15, 2025
b) Homeless Advisory Committee November 12, 2025
c) Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation November 20, 2025
City Council Minutes
February 17, 2026
Page 3 of 6
Page 6 of 53
d) Planning & Zoning Commission December 10, 2025
8. Ordinances
a) Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund in the amount of
$104,628.00 for the STD/HIV-DIS Prevention Services Program from the Texas
Department of State Health Services (DSHS) for Calendar Year 2026; authorizing
the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary to accept
said funds.
9. Resolutions
a) Resolution authorizing a contract with Digital Resources, Inc. (DRI) to design,
purchase, install, integrate, and test a fully integrated audio/video system in the
new City Council Chambers through the TIPS Co-op Purchasing Program with
PEG funding in the amount of $496,500.41 .
b) Resolution authorizing the purchase of three BMW R 1300 RT-P Motorcycles from
Retail Motorcycle Ventures, Inc. in the amount of $122,333.31 .
c) Resolution confirming reappointment of Laura Fidelie to the Firefighters and Police
Officers' Civil Service Commission with a term to expire December 31, 2028.
d) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the 2026
Crack Seal Project to Holbrook Asphalt, LLC in the amount of $232,500.00.
e) Resolution authorizing the City of Wichita Falls's continued participation with the
Steering Committee of Cities Served by Oncor; and authorizing the payment of ten
cents per capita to the Steering Committee to fund regulatory and legal
proceedings and activities related to Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC.
Regular Agenda
10. Ordinances
There was no discussion or action taken on this item.
a) Ordinance rezoning +/- 37.61 acres of land from General Commercial (GC) to Light
Industrial (LI) located at 2100 & 2226 Airport Drive (26.91 Acres, Abstract 344 — T.
Currey, & +/- 10.7 acres out of the R. Brown Survey, Abstract 522), and +/- 60.87
acres of land from Multi-Family Residential (MFR) to Light Industrial (LI) zoning
district located at 2100 Airport Drive, 2226 Airport Drive, Property ID #107232, and
Property ID #107235 (+/-50.27 Acres, T. Currey Survey, Abstract 344; and +/-10.6
acres out of the R. Brown Survey, Abstract 522), and amend the Land Use Plan
from High Density Residential to Light Industrial to allow for the construction of a
data center.
11. Other Council Matters
City Council Minutes
February 17, 2026
Page 4 of 6
Page 7 of 53
a) Announcements concerning items of community interest from members of the City
Council. No action will be taken or discussed.
Councilor Cobb encouraged everyone to vote.
Councilor Brooks expressed frustration with requests for patience regarding the Victoria
Lang incident and said the community has waited many years for meaningful change. He
called for arrests and accountability, stated that photos and public appearances do not
replace real action, referenced the significance of Black History, and urged the public to
focus on facts and outcomes rather than appearances.
Councilor Flack stated that differences of opinion among elected officials are a normal
and valuable part of the governmental process. She expressed confidence in established
policies, procedures, and due process, acknowledged the difficulty of waiting for
outcomes, and stated that patience is necessary to ensure the integrity of the
investigation and the proper application of the law.
Councilor Browning encouraged voter participation and strongly supported Mayor Short,
commending his involvement and service to the community. He stated that it was
inappropriate for the Mayor to be personally criticized during public comment.
Councilor Taylor emphasized the need to allow the state and other appropriate
authorities to complete their investigation so that any findings would withstand legal
scrutiny and potential appeal. He announced the upcoming TIF #3 meeting, recognized
the contributions of host families to the community, and expressed appreciation for a
recent presentation on data centers and artificial intelligence.
Councilor Battaglino congratulated City Manager Jeff Jenkins for being named the 2026
Dancing for the Stars Mirror Ball Champion, announced his participation in the
multicultural parade this weekend, where he will carry the American flag with American
Legion Post 169, and noted he would be volunteering at the Home and Garden Show.
Quoting Abraham Lincoln, "A house divided against itself cannot stand," he emphasized
the importance of unity and expressed strong support for Mayor Short, commending his
leadership and dedication to the City. He also stated that Councilor Brooks is an
important member of the Council, publicly expressed his support for him, and
acknowledged that the current matter is a heavy situation with strong emotions and a
shared desire to see justice served.
Mayor Short stated that his support for Councilor Brooks has remained unchanged and
reaffirmed that commitment. He announced his plans to attend the MLK Multicultural
Parade on Saturday at 1 :00 p.m. and the installation service for Reverend Ray Dixon as
pastor of St. Paul Missionary Baptist Church on Sunday at 3:00 p.m.
12. Executive Sessions
a) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code §551.071,
City Council Minutes
February 17, 2026
Page 5 of 6
Page 8 of 53
consultation with attorney on matters involving pending or contemplated litigation
or other matters in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under
the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas
clearly conflicts with the Texas Open Meetings Act (including, but not limited to,
Lake Ringgold).
b) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code § 551 .087, to
discuss or deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business
prospect that the City Council seeks to have, locate, stay, or expand in or near the
territory of the City of Wichita Falls and with which the City and/or economic
development corporations created by the City are conducting economic
development negotiations (including, but not limited to, economic development
update.)
c) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code § 551 .072, to
deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property interests due to
the fact that deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the
position of the City in negotiations with a third party (including, but not limited to,
Lake Ringgold)
City Council adjourned into Executive Session at 9:37 a.m. in accordance with Texas
Government Code §552.071 , §552.087, and §552.072.
Mayor Short reconvened the meeting in open session at 11 :05 a.m. and announced
that no votes or polls were taken.
13. Adjourn
Mayor Short adjourned the meeting at 11 :06 a.m.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 3rd day of March 2026.
Tim Short, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marie Balthrop, TRMC, MMC
City Clerk
City Council Minutes
February 17, 2026
Page 6 of 6
Page 9 of 53
City of Wichita Falls
Employee Benefits Trust Board — Meeting Minutes
September 24, 2025
The meeting was held in the Conference Room of Big Blue Tower, 719 Scott Ave., Wichita
Falls, TX 76301 .
Present: Jeffery Jenkins, City Manager
Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager
Kinley Hegglund, City Attorney
Christi Klyn, Director of Human Resources
Stephen Calvert, Chief Financial Officer
Agenda Items:
Meeting was called to order at 1 :33 PM.
II. The September 16, 2025 meeting minutes were unanimously approved.
III. The board discussed the request to relocate the QuadMed facility to the current
immunizations area at the Health Department. This move would necessitate a remodel of
the bathroom to ensure it is ADA compliant. The board ultimately decided to maintain the
QuadMed facility in its current location. The Request for Proposal (RFP) for the new clinic
provider will begin in January 2026. Once the RFP process is complete, the selected clinic
is expected to move to the new facility in the fall of 2026.
IV. The Board agreed for HUB to do an RFP for a worksite coverage vendor (currently offered
by Aflac).
V. All items below were opened for public comment— no comments received. The Board
voted unanimously to:
a. Implement option 3 — Renewal Active Rates from the HUB 2026 Renewal
Analysis proposal for active employees, no premium increases for plan year
2026.
b. Renewal of retiree rates for pre-65 retiree plans will increase by 7.3% paid by
retirees on this plan.
c. The UHC Medicare Advantage renewal rates will increase from a monthly rate of
$375.17 to $475.17.
d. Renew three benefit premium holidays for active employees and retirees.
VI. The Board voted unanimously to add ARAG Legal, ID protection, and pet insurance as
options to the 2026 plan year for active employees.
VII. The board discussed the future wellness facility and use of BCBS wellness funds.
Page 10 of 53
VIII. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2:14 PM.
Prepared by: Nikki Fyock, Benefit Specialist, City of Wichita Falls/HR-EBT
Page 11 of 53
MINUTES OF THE
WICHITA FALLS 4B SALES TAX CORPORATION (WF4BSTC)
NOVEMBER 6, 2025
PRESENT:
Glenn Barham, President § WF4BSTC Members
Michael Grassi, Vice-President §
Stephen Santellana §
Craig Reynolds §
Darrell Coleman §
Steve Garner §
Tim Short, Mayor § Mayor&City Councilors
Tom Taylor, Councilor, District 5 §
Jeff Jenkins, City Manager § City Staff
Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager §
Blake Jurecek, Assistant City Manager §
Kinley Hegglund, City Attorney §
Stephen Calvert, CFO & Finance Director §
Russell Schreiber, Public Works Director §
Monica Aguon, Deputy City Attorney §
Fabian Medellin, Planning Manager §
Samantha Forrester,. PIO Specialist §
Paige Lessor, Executive Legal Assistant §
Jessica Wood, Executive Managing § Backdoor Theatre
Director
David Gray, Board Treasurer §
Moriah Williams, CEO § Forward Wichita Falls
ABSENT: §
Nick Schreiber, Secretary-Treasurer §
1. Call to Order.
Mr. Glenn Barham called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m., noting that a quorum was
present.
2. Report of.Financial Condition.
Mr. Paul Menzies reported that he had just received sales tax revenue receipts for
November, reflecting September activity and closing out the fiscal year. Overall, sales tax
performance continues the positive trend seen in recent months, with total collections finishing
the fiscal year approximately 2% higher than the same period last year, indicating continued
strength on the revenue side. The financial statements also reflect the transition into the new fiscal
year, during which the board has not yet begun receiving its new-year revenue allocations; those
revenues will be realized over the next 12 months. At this point, the organization is holding
approximately$2.5 million in unrestricted, free-and-clear cash.
Mr. Stephen Santellana made a motion to approve the financial report. Seconded by Mr.
Darrell Coleman, with no further public comment, the motion carried 6-0.
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 1 of 4
11/6/2025
• Page 12 of 53
3. Consent Agenda:
a) Approval of Minutes of September 4, 2025.
b) Approval of Minutes of October 2, 2025.
Mr. Steve Garner made a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented.
Seconded by Craig Reynolds, with no further public comment, the motion carried 6-0.
4. Public hearing regarding a funding request from Backdoor Theatre to
support a proposed renovation project at 501 Indiana downtown.
Mr. Barham opened the public hearing at 3:04 p.m.
Ms. Jessica Wood, Executive Managing Director of Backdoor Theatre, presented
a funding request for assistance with an exterior accessibility and facility upgrade project.
She provided background on Backdoor Theatre as the only nonprofit community theater
in Wichita Falls, established in 1970 and operating from its historic Ice House building at
501 Indiana Avenue since 1975, with its first production there in 1976. The theater's
mission is to enrich, educate, and entertain the community through the performing arts,
serving more than 5,000 patrons annually and engaging over 200 volunteers each year.
Ms. Wood emphasized the theater's cultural importance to the community, including its
role as a venue for civic events, weddings, and nonprofit gatherings, as well as its draw
for international visitors associated with Sheppard Air Force Base.
Ms. Wood outlined the need for continued investment in safety, accessibility, and
preservation of the historic structure. She described Phase One of the improvement
project, which was completed earlier this year and included resurfacing approximately
14,000 square feet of parking lot at a cost of approximately $96,500. Phase Two of the
project, for which assistance is being requested, is estimated at approximately $150,000
and includes exterior lighting improvements, new and more visible signage, brick and
mortar repairs to the tower structure, roofing repairs to address leaks caused by
deteriorating original materials, and landscaping improvements to enhance both safety
and aesthetics. She noted that improved lighting and signage are especially critical due
to evening performances and public perceptions about downtown safety, and that all
proposed upgrades are being coordinated with the Landmark Commission to preserve
the building's historic character.
Ms. Wood reported that $56,000 has already been raised toward Phase Two,.
including an Impact100 grant awarded earlier this year, with an additional $33,000 in
grant funding currently pending. The remaining balance is expected to be funded through
a combination of donations, future grants, and organizational fundraising efforts. She
also shared that the theater is approaching its 50th anniversary at the Ice House and
plans to launch a formal building fund to ensure long-term sustainability and relieve future
leadership of major deferred-maintenance concerns, allowing them to focus on
programming and community engagement.
In closing, Ms. Wood highlighted Backdoor Theatre's long-standing commitment
to community stewardship and youth development, referencing the original agreement
under which the building was donated—requiring padded seating and the continuation of
a summer youth musical program. She described the summer youth musical as a fully
student-produced production involving local middle and high school students both
onstage and behind the scenes, fostering confidence, skills, and a lifelong connection to
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 2 of 4
11/6/2025
Page 13 of 53
the arts. Ms. Wood emphasized that the requested support is not only about preserving
a historic building, but about strengthening downtown, sustaining a vibrant arts
community, and ensuring that Backdoor Theatre remains a resource for future
•
generations of storytellers and patrons.
Mr. Barham welcomed any questions from the Board.
Mr. Garner asked for additional details regarding the proposed exterior signage
and the theater's collaboration with Reuben's House of Classics. Ms. Wood explained
that the project includes a three-foot by eight-foot black metal, backlit sign featuring the
Backdoor Theatre logo, designed to comply with Landmark Commission requirements.
The sign is planned for placement on a small island of property near the former
barbershop area and is intended to improve visibility during evening events. Ms. Wood
confirmed that the estimated signage cost of approximately $13,500 includes assistance
from Reuben's House of Classics.
Mr. Reynolds questioned whether the architect's work involved preventative
techniques beyond simply patching visible holes in the historic tower structure,
referencing methods to prevent recurring deterioration. Ms. Wood acknowledged the
question and indicated that a detailed architect's report is available and would be
provided to further explain the repair approach, including measures intended to address
ongoing wear rather than temporary fixes.
Discussion then shifted to funding amounts and the net request being made of the
WF4BSTC. Board members sought clarification on how much funding had already been
secured versus what remained outstanding. Ms. Wood and Mr. David Cook, Backdoor
Theatre's Board Treasurer, reiterated that approximately $56,000 has been raised to
date, while an additional $33,000 in grant funding is pending but not guaranteed. As the
total estimated cost of Phase Two is approximately $154,950, Board members worked
through various funding scenarios to understand the remaining gap, noting that,
depending on grant outcomes, the unmet need could range between approximately
$65,000 and $100,000.
Mr. Cook emphasized that the theater is not presenting a fixed funding demand or
insisting on a 75% contribution model. He explained that earlier discussions with staff
suggested flexibility would be appropriate and that the intent of the request is to invite
the 4B Corporation to partner in the project in a manner it deems appropriate. Options
discussed included funding specific project components, such as roofing or lighting,
rather than a single lump-sum contribution. Board members acknowledged this flexibility,
noting that selecting individual project elements could be a practical approach.
After no further questions or comments, Mr. Barham closed the public hearing at
3:19 p.m.
5. Consideration of a proposed fiscal year 2025-26 budget amendment to
reallocate funds for downtown economic development and marketing services to
Forward Wichita Falls.
Mr. Menzies explained that the original allocation to the Chamber was approved
during the budget process to support downtown and urban core economic development
efforts. Since that time, Forward Wichita Falls has formally assumed the role of the City's
economic development organization, making it appropriate to redirect the funding to Forward
Wichita Falls to perform the same services originally contemplated.
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 3 of 4
I1/6/2025
Page 14 of 53
Ms. Moriah Williams outlined how Forward Wichita Falls would utilize the funding,
emphasizing that the organization's role is not event production or festival management, but
rather economic development focused on revitalizing downtown and the broader urban core.
She explained that the funds would support professional, market-driven evaluation of
downtown and urban core properties, including assessing building conditions,
redevelopment potential, leasing or sale opportunities, demolition needs, and associated
investment costs. Forward Wichita Falls would approach urban core development in the
same manner it handles industrial recruitment and retention—maintaining an inventory of
available properties, assisting property owners, and guiding businesses through the process
from initial interest to full occupancy.
Ms. Williams further noted that the urban core focus extends beyond a small
downtown footprint and includes a broader area encompassing the hotel district, hospital
district, areas beyond the railroad tracks, and surrounding corridors. She described ongoing
work, including meetings with prospective businesses interested in locating downtown and
site tours conducted by Forward Wichita Falls staff. She also discussed plans to eventually
hire a team member with specialized expertise in real estate, architecture, or engineering to
strengthen the organization's urban development capabilities, while noting that Forward
Wichita Falls is already performing these functions with its current team.
WF4BSTC Board confirmed that the action under consideration was strictly a
reallocation of existing funds, not a request for additional funding. It was also noted that the
Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation had recently taken similar action by
redirecting funds previously provided to the Chamber toward Forward Wichita Falls.
Mr. Santellana made a motion to reallocate $200,000 in funding for downtown
economic development and marketing services from the Wichita Fails Chamber of
Commerce to Forward Wichita Falls. Seconded by Mr. Garner, with no further comments,
the motion carried 6-0.
6. Executive Session.
Mr. Barham adjourned the meeting into executive session at 3:25 p.m. pursuant to Texas
Government Code sections 551.087, 551.071, and 551.072. He announced the meeting back
into regular session at 3:48 p.m. The subjects posted in the Notice of Meeting were deliberated,
and no votes or further action were taken on these items in executive session.
7. Consideration of a funding request from Backdoor Theatre to support a proposed
renovation project at 501 Indiana downtown.
Mr. Garner made a motion to approve funding not to exceed $13,500 to assist with the
purchase and installation of new signage for Backdoor Theatre. Payment shall be made as a
reimbursement. Seconded by Mr. Grassi, and after no public comment or further discussion, the
motion carried 6-0.
8. Adjourn.
No further discussions took place, nor actions taken. Mr. Barham adjourned the meeting
at 3:50 p.m.
(13QS• af
Glenn Barham, President
Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 4 of 4
11/6/2025
Page 15 of 53
LANDMARK COMMISSION
MINUTES
November 18, 2025
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Christy Graham ■Chairperson
Joel Hartmangruber •Vice-Chair
JD Dixon • Member
Bill Enlow •Member
Dr. Dawn Ferrell, Maj. Gen. (retired) ■Member
Noros Martin ■ Member
Janel Ponder Smith ■ Member
John Yates • Member
Whitney Flack ■ Council Liaison
Monica Aguon, Assistant City Attorney • City Staff
Karen Montgomery-Gagne, Principal Planner/HPO ■ City Staff
ABSENT:
John Dickinson ■Member
GUESTS:
Allen Winger-(1414 Tilden) • Representative
Xavier Lewis -(1414 Tilden) ■Contractor
Amor
Fernando Miranda - (3006 10th) ■Applicant
Jessica Wood -(501 Indiana) ■Applicant
Dylan Jimenez-KFDX •Reporter
I. Call to Order, Introductions and Welcome:
Chairperson Christy Graham called the meeting to order at 12:00 p.m.
Ms. Graham did introductions of Commission members, and guests attending.
II. Review & Approval of Minutes from August 26, 2025:
Chairperson Graham called for review and approval of the August 26th, 2025,
Landmark Commission meeting minutes. Mr. Noros Martin made a motion to
approve the minutes as presented, Dr. Dawn Ferrell seconded the motion. Minutes
were unanimously approved. 9-0. Chairperson Graham asked if there was anyone
from the public that had comments about the minutes, and there were no comments.
III. Action Item: Design Review Case — 501 Indiana: Backdoor Theatre:
Request authorization to install a new metal 3x8ft ground sign (indirect LED lighting)
and 13 new exterior light fixtures/electrical conduit on main building facades for
improved safety/visibility. (Depot Square HD)
Applicant: Jessica Wood, Executive Managing Director of Backdoor Theater
Page 16 of 53
Landmark Commission 2 November 18, 2025
Staff presented the case and stated this structure was originally the People's Ice
House Company and in 1986 was featured in Texas Highways publication as the
only theatre use of a former icehouse in Texas. She added, the structure was
constructed in 1919 and is a contributing structure located in the Depot Square
Historic District. Staff displayed a photo of the subject property from 1927, courtesy
of Backdoor Theatre. Inventory photos from 1995 and 1999 showed minor
modifications to accommodate Backdoor Theatre that occurred approximately in
1986, such as a former ground sign being removed for the concrete handicapped
ramp and sign mural installed in 2009 with other courtyard improvements and
exterior lighting on the south façade, authorized by the Landmark Commission.
Current inventory photos showed little had changed on the subject property.
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne stated the current sign had limited visibility on west façade
facing Indiana and after dusk signage not visible at all. The proposed sign would be
a 3X8 foot metal ground sign with indirect lighting at a pedestrian/vehicle height and
closer to Indiana Avenue.
The second request, Ms. Montgomery-Gagne advised, was for the addition of 13
LED light fixtures on select columns on each façade; north façade (facing 5th St) —
4 fixtures; east façade (facing courtyard/alley) — 2 fixtures; south façade (facing
parking lot) — 4 fixtures; west façade (facing Indiana Ave) — 3 fixtures. The current
view from the parking lot was shown, with handicapped ramp that showed the
existing 1 light fixture/electrical conduit and mature live oaks which are an important
site feature and aesthetic, but block lighting. The goal of the lighting project:
improved functionality and aesthetic visibility, in addition to safety for both patrons
and performers.
Applicant photos clearly illustrated how dark the historic property becomes after
sunset when the majority of patrons are attending performances. The mural sign on
the west façade (facing Indiana) is essentially blocked by shadows from the trees
along with the handicapped ramp/parking lot area being dark for patrons and
performers. Alterations requested are for both increased visibility and safety.
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne stated Backdoor Theatre continues to work closely with
City staff/Landmark Commission and to bring all proposals for approval before work
is initiated. She also advised this proposal conforms to all design guidelines and
staff recommends approval.
Chairwoman Graham asked if the applicant, Ms. Jessica Wood, Executive
Managing Director, Backdoor Theatre had any presentations or statements for the
Commission. Ms. Wood stated she had nothing further and felt Ms. Montgomery-
Gagne did a wonderful job of presenting the case.
There was discussion among the Commission and Ms. Wood regarding lighting and
the theatre's preference. Ms. Wood stated Backdoor Theatre had received a grant
for funding and they would follow the Commission's recommendation.
Page 17 of 53
Landmark Commission 3 November 18, 2025
Ms. Ponder-Smith made a motion to break up the requests into two separate
motions. Mr. Dixon seconded the motion. Mr. Martin asked if that was something
they could do, Ms. Montgomery-Gagne and Chairwoman Graham advised yes, that
was an acceptable option.
Chairwomen Graham made the motion to approve the proposed lighting as
presented. After much discussion among Commission and the applicant, there was
no second and the motion died on the floor. Dr. Farrell made a motion to table the
discussion of lighting with Ms. Ponder-Smith seconding to allow Backdoor Theatre
additional time to research options/costs for alternate up/down lighting fixtures found
on other structures in the Depot Square Historic District. Motion passed unanimously
9-0 to table the lighting proposal.
Ms. Ponder-Smith made a motion to approve the new construction of a ground-
mounted, metal sign 3ft x 8ft with indirect LED lighting utilizing the words/logo as
shown in the application design schematic. The sign will be placed in the triangular
island by the Indiana entrance north of the barbershop storage building. Mr. Dixon
seconded and the motion passed unanimously 9-0.
IV. Action Item: Design Review— 3006 10th St:
Request authorization to install a replacement pergola comprised of all metal in the
rear yard (visible from public ROW) in compliance with setback standards. (West
Floral Heights HD)
Applicant: Fernando Miranda
voy
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne presented the case and advised the Commission this was
brought to staffs attention in summer 2025 due to extensive work done in the yard
and is currently still undergoing changes. She stated the subject property, a
prominent contributing structure on 10th Street, was constructed circa 1923 located
in the West Floral Heights Historic District. The primary structure is the historic
house and rear detached two-story garage apartment. There was an additional
detached structure to the east of the house built in 1989. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne
stated the secondary structure, although not contributing, was constructed with
materials to match the primary residence design and scale.
The Colonial Revival residence is characterized by its 2'/2-story rectangular Burke
block form, capped with a hipped roof and roof dormer. A 2-story frame east wing
extends from the main block and includes an open first-floor porch with a room
above. The symmetrical façade features paired double-hung sash windows with
stone sills, complemented by semi-hexagonal bay windows flanking the main entry,
each containing double-hung sash windows and transoms. The front entry is notably
elaborate, highlighted by a stone surround and sidelights. Contributing structures on
the site include the primary house and a rear garage/apartment, while a later one-
story garage constructed around 1989 is as mentioned, non-contributing.
Inventory photos displayed from 2013 show the subject property unchanged from
the designation in 2005. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne pointed out in the photo a portion
Page 18 of 53
Landmark Commission 4 November 18, 2025
of the original wood pergola visible from the right-of-way. Photos from 2019, again
show the property unchanged until this spring when ownership changed from the
late Dr. Karen Reed. There was a ramp installed and removed in July that is no AMA
longer a design consideration. Extensive landscaping conducted (terracing,
stone/brick knee walls, etc.) in the back and front yards. It was determined in
conjunction with Building Inspection, if the retaining walls were less than four-feet,
permits were not triggered and utilized brick similar to the primary structure coupled
with obscured view from the 10th St public ROW so design review was not required.
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne showed photos taken in August and November 2025
showing a replacement metal pergola installed in June by former contractor void of
design review and building permits giving staff design, materials, and setback
concerns. The pergola was highly visible from the alley public ROW. There was also
a rear multi-tiered deck replaced prior to former owner's passing. However, it was
undetermined to what extent the decking was maintenance and repair vs. expansion
and extension, therefore design review was not required. The new owner, as of
October, moved the illegal metal pergola until the case was slated for review by the
Landmark Commission as not in violation to obtain an electrical permit. Photos taken
by staff on August 7, 2025, show a detailed view of the replacement metal pergola
from rear public right-of-way with different massing, profile, and design from the
former wood pergola. There were also issues with the setback as it appeared to
overhang the rear fence/property line. A photo taken in November showed the metal
pergola moved from the concrete pad and out of rear setback, until issues could be
addressed as well as missing permits.
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne stated when looking at the design review guidelines the
landscape features not visible from the public right-of-way are not regulated.
However, the guidelines are clear regarding landscaping features that were visible
from the right-of-way that states "Do not remove or destroy any built historic
landscape feature that is visible from the public ROW unless deteriorated beyond
repair". Ms. Montgomery-Gagne advised the family of the former owner was
concerned about the wooden pergola being a safety hazard and had it removed, so
it may have deteriorated beyond repair. The design guidelines state new structures
must reflect historically present building forms, materials, massing, proportions, and
architectural style. Including the height of new construction shall not exceed height
of tallest contributing building on lot/block; the quality of construction/materials
prioritized over style; the design of new accessory buildings should be compatible
with the scale of the associated primary building and historic character of district yet
discernible as new. The materials/finish used for out buildings shall correspond to
overall character of district and building type. There is also a question of the setback
since there is no survey for the subject property. The City ordinance states
accessory buildings not exceeding 150 square feet in floor area may be placed
within the rear setback area, but no closer than one (1) foot from rear lot line. Staff
is working with building inspections regarding the setbacks. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne
stated the owner, Mr. Fernando Miranda, is requesting the Commission consider
approving the replacement metal pergola, however, the structure will have to meet
the setback ordinance requirements.
Page 19 of 53
Landmark Commission 5 November 18, 2025
Chairwoman Graham asked if Mr. Miranda was present and wished to make a
presentation which he declined, but stated he would move the pergola wherever the
Commission instructed placement. Chairwoman Graham asked Mr. Miranda how
big the concrete slab currently in the backyard was versus the pergola. The applicant
stated it was a couple of feet bigger than the pergola. Chairwoman Graham stated
with the size of the pergola and the slab he would be able to move the pergola onto
the slab and still conform to the setback requirements. Chairwoman Graham asked
Mr. Miranda if he built the pergola and he stated it was there when he purchased
the property.
Chairwoman Graham asked if there was anyone from the public that wished to
comment. With no comments from the public, Chairwoman Graham asked if there
was a motion to approve moving the metal pergola onto the concrete pad to ensure
setback compliance. Dr. Ferrell introduced a motion to approve the pergola case as
presented. Mr. Hartmangruber seconded the motion. Commission voted
unanimously to approve 9-0.
V. Action Item: Design Review -1414 Tilden:
Request authorization to replace all 74 original existing wooden windows in house
and garage apartment with Renewal by Andersen Acclaim Fibrex material with
dimensional muntins (exterior and interior). (West Floral Heights HD)
Applicant: Dawn Neville
Staff presented the case and advised staff was contacted by a representative from
Renewal by Andersen that was present at the meeting, that was working with the
contractor and home owner on addressing concerns on recent storm damage on the
windows. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne stated there were 74 windows to be replaced and
would be done in phases, however, the owner was seeking approval for all windows
at that time since they would all be replaced with the same materials.
The subject property, located on the corner of Tilden and Avenue E was a
contributing property located in the West Floral Heights Historic District. Constructed
circa 1915, this Colonial Revival contributing structure features a side-gabled roof
with wide, open eaves and exposed rafter tails, presenting a symmetrical two-story
façade. The building retains its original wood windows—paired and tripled double-
hung units with multi-pane sashes in 6-over-6 and 4-over-4 configurations—while
vinyl siding, added before the district's 2005 designation, now clads the exterior. An
elegant, pedimented entry porch with a curved underside supported by slender Doric
columns highlights the front elevation, and three chimneys further define the home's
historic character.
Inventory photos displayed from 2013 and 2019 show the large number of windows
are a character defining feature and remain essentially unchanged. Photos shown
from April 2025 after a spring storm that had hail and damaging winds show exterior
wood frame damage, flaking paint, and glass panes broken and/or cracked. From
the interior there was water leaking inside house and causing damage to historic
vow
Page 20 of 53
Landmark Commission 6 November 18, 2025
woodwork, walls/plaster, and furniture. Multiple photos displayed of the many
windows show the trend in exterior as well as interior damage to the historical
structure and the need for window replacements. The new owners are concerned
about black mold and are seeking a remedy with window replacement.
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne. advised the applicant is proposing to replace all 74
windows in the primary structure and garage/apartment in phases with engineered
fibrex, which is 40% reclaimed wood fiber combined with 60% thermo plastic
polymer. The muntin profiles are full divided light, exterior, between glass and
interior. In phase one, 24 windows would be replaced. She stated the proposed
window replacement product (Acclaim Fibrex Composite Material) does not meet
Wichita Falls Design Standards based on profile of sill/framework being wider,
substitute material is a vinyl product which is not an approved option. Texas
Historical Commission does not recommend use of Fibrex in historically designated
buildings. Use of Fibrex Composite material for replacement of 74 windows will
impact the overall architectural character of the house/garage apt. and block as a
contributing corner property. The fibrex window is classified as a vinyl (plastic)
window; fibrex is not fiberglass as fiberglass has been considered a substitute
material on secondary facades as its base is glass melted/molded under high-heat.
The fibrex material is not considered in keeping with Sec. of Interior's Standards and
would require replacement within 20-30 years.
Staff recommended consideration of wood, aluminum clad wood or aluminum
windows that do meet the adopted Wichita Falls design standard options and follow
Texas Historical Commission and Dept. of the Interior standards.
Chairwoman Graham asked if there was anyone from the public that wished to
comment. Mr. Xavier Lewis, Senior Project Manager with Renewal by Andersen
stated that the fibrex windows are specifically engineered to replicate historic wood
profiles, maintain the architectural authenticity of Colonial homes, and meet current
energy and safety codes. Mr. Lewis stated this proposal would preserve the historic
appearance of the structure while improving long-term durability and performance.
Mr. Lewis advised the Commission the Acclaim Fibrex windows were fashioned after
the wooden window and the closest you could get as it was not aluminum, and not
vinyl. Mr. Lewis stated the existing historic windows are deteriorated beyond
practical repair and due to the level of degradation, repair is not feasible without
replacing major components. Under the Secretary of the Interior's Standard 6,
replacement is appropriate when deterioration is beyond repair.
Mr. Lewis advised that the Acclaim Fibrex windows accurately replicate the
appearance of the historic wood windows and the material is compatible with
preservation standards. From the right-of-way Mr. Lewis stated you could not tell the
difference from painted wood and that met Secretary Standards 2 and 5, which
safeguard historic character and defining features and that under section 9,
substitute material is acceptable when they are compatible in appearance, texture,
and form and the proposed windows meet that requirement.
Page 21 of 53
Landmark Commission 7 November 18, 2025
Mr. Lewis stated the proposed windows meet modern energy, safety, and building
code requirements and the overall project preserves the character-defining feature
of the colonial façade, fully aligning with preservation best practices and standards
2, 5, and 6.
In conclusion Mr. Lewis advised their proposed Acclaim Fibrex windows; preserve
the historic appearance of the 100-year-old colonial home; matches the original
wood window design and sightlines; strengthens long-term preservation by
preventing ongoing deterioration' meets or exceeds energy and safety codes;
complies with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation; and
maintains architectural integrity and the visual character of the historic district. For
those reasons, Mr. Lewis requested approval from the Commission for the proposed
window replacements.
After extensive discussion between the Commission and Mr. Lewis, Chairwoman
Graham made a motion to approve the new construction with replacement windows
utilizing a specific alternative material (Acclaim Fibrex) for limited application, as it
consisted of a combination of wood fibers and polymers. The Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties is referenced in this case
as the new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed, the
essential form and integrity of the historic property would not be impaired.
Furthermore, it was determined by the Commission that according to the Wichita
Falls Design Guidelines (Windows pg 56), although some substitute materials may
be used for replacement windows, the appearance of windows from the public ROW
shall closely resemble the original in size, configuration, profile, and finish.
Dimensional muntins shall be placed on the outside glass and spaces between the
glass so the window appears to have true divided lites from an oblique view. Dr.
Farrell seconded the motion, which passed with a 6-2 vote.
VI. Action Item: 2026 Landmark Commission Meeting Schedule
Review and Adoption of the 2026 Landmark Commission Meeting Schedule
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne presented the proposed 2026 Landmark Commission
Meeting Schedule. Ms. Ponder-Smith made a motion to approve the 2026 Landmark
Commission Meeting Schedule as proposed. Chairperson Graham seconded the
motion which passed 9-0.
VII. Other Business:
a) Monthly Reports:
Chairperson Graham for the Depot Square HD:
12/06 —City Lights Parade 4pm-6:30pm
11/21 — 12/13— Backdoor Theatre— Silver Bells
Wichita Theatre will host"Christmas with the Rat Pack"for one performance only.
11/14— 12/20 —Wichita Theatre— Murder on the Orient Express
11/22 — 12/20 —The Grinch that Stole Christmas
12/22 — Grand 01' Christmas Show
Ms. Janel Ponder Smith for West Floral Heights HD: All board positions are full.
Page 22 of 53
Landmark Commission 8 November 18, 2025
b) Updates:
• Berry Brown House (1400 Travis) — Demolition due to fire and lack of
maintenance.
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne gave updates on the Berry Brown House (1400 Travis)
and the recent city council ordered demolition due to severe state of disrepair
to the point of being deemed a life, health and safety threat in the community.
Discussion among the Commission ensued, including the status of the historic
Victorian style fence that was also removed to access the site for demolition.
Preservation Priorities 2026-2028:
-Protecting our Historic Resources
-Working with our community to nominate five resources
*Noting: East Side Community, Indian Heights, Fillmore, Southland and Brook Village.
-Seeking funding
*To get additional city budget funding over a three-year period,to then match with a certified
local government grant from the State to hire a consultant to work with the community.
-Going out in inventory
*Working with volunteers, working with people from Dr. Draper's Department, working with
graduate students in the History Department and working with volunteers from the Wichita
County Historical Commission.
-Outreach in the community about why it is important.
-Texas First Initiative
*Being on an inventory and registered so that your downtown is recognized.
c) Resources/Webinars:
• The Medallion (THC) — Fall 2025
• NAPC Webinars — Design Review Roundtable (Nov 13)
d) Design Review: Staff Authorized — Minor Alteration/Repairs/Permits:
• 129 Pembroke(Morningside Nat'l Register HD)—20-window replacement;informational purposes only
• 408 Morningside(Morningside Nat'l Register HD)—roofing replacement; informational purposes only
• 2704 9th St (Momingside Nat'l Register HD) — kitchen remodel + 3 windows/1 door; informational
purposes only
• 1711 Grant(West Floral Heights HD)—roofing—replace same style materials; comp shingle
• 1501 Tilden(West Floral Heights HD)—carriage door rebuild(garage apt.); same style materials
• 1700 Hayes(West Floral Heights HD)—roofing—replace same style materials; comp shingle
• 1701 Hayes(West Floral Heights HD)—roofing—replace same style materials; comp shingle
• 2806 Ave E (West Floral Heights HD) — garage door — replace same design/profile/size &
materials
VII. Adjourn:
Chairperson Graham adjourned the meeting at 2:22 pm and stated the next scheduled
meeting would be January 27, 2026 at 12:00 pm.
et4.44/Lan
G?/071-/
Christy Graham, Chairperson Date
told
Page 23 of 53
MINUTES
Tax Increment Financing #3 Board
December 16, 2025
PRESENT:
Kenneth Haney, Chairperson •Member
Councilman Tom Taylor •Member
Mark Beauchamp, Wichita Co. Commissioner •Member
Ray Dixon, Jr. •Member
Barry Mahler, Wichita Co. Commissioner •Member
Monica Aguon, Deputy City Attorney •Legal Dept.
Fabian Medellin, Development Services Director •Staff Liaison
Rita Miller, Neighborhood Services Manager •City Staff
Karen Montgomery-Gagne, Principal Planner •Staff Liaison
Marquise Blue, IT Department •City Staff
Michael Davis, Community Center Coordinator •City Staff
Jack Browne •P&Z Commissioner
ABSENT:
Councilman Robert Brooks •Member
Sandra Gross •Member
CALL TO ORDER
Now The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Mr. Kenneth Haney at 5:36 p.m.
Chairperson Haney noted the achievements of local athletics. Jacob Rodriguez has won
numerous 2025 National Football awards as a defensive player and was the 5th place finalist
for the Heisman Trophy. Also noted was Midwestern State University, Division II Men's
Soccer Team, becoming National Champions. This being the Mustangs' first national
championship in program history.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Mark Beauchamp made a motion to adopt the November 20, 2025, minutes
and Councilman Tom Taylor seconded the motion. Chairman Haney asked if anyone had
any comments, and no additional comments were made. Chairman Haney took the motion
to vote, and it was approved unanimously 5-0.
III. FINANCIAL UPDATE
Director of Development Services, Fabian Medellin gave a financial update where the TIF
board is after the actions after the last meeting. This is an annual breakdown over the last
three years of contributions from the city and from the county, as well as accrued interest
over that time period. As of now there is $1.5 million in the account. The allocation
breakdowns of how the funds are to be dispersed are: 40% intended for private fund projects
($636,000); 40% intended for public fund projects ($636,000); and 20% allocation for
discretionary projects ($318,000). At the last meeting there were two action items that were
voted on and approved. The Facade Improvement and Professional Assistance Grant that
was approved from the discretionary funds in the amount of$200,000. There was also a civic
art initiative that was allocated from the public funds in the amount of$75,000. Then prior to
Page 24 of 53
Tax Increment Financing#3 Board Meeting PAGE 2 December 16,2025
that,there were the two initial applications that were received,totaling $20,000. (Zoom Zoom
5/Nael Trading LLC. and House of Empowerment; private funds);there is$616,000 available 44.100
for private projects, $561,000 for public projects and $118,000 for discretionary funds.
There was some discussion on how the money is invested, and it was asked if they can be
more strategic in their investments to increase interest earned. Director Medellin said he
would bring it to the attention of our Finance Director, to see if there is a more aggressive
strategy to increase the return. Commissioner Beauchamp noted that the way to invest with
public funds is safety/security first, then liquidity and then finally yield. But the fact that we
are looking at half the yield we got two years ago, if we can't do better. Additional questions
were asked about the fund investments, and Director Medellin said he could send an
informational email to the board members. It was noted by legal that they would want to
avoid any walking forums.
Chairman Haney asked if there were any questions from the audience. Commissioner
Beauchamp stated that government pools do allow you liquidity, and it is a good place to
park money if you are needing liquidity. But in this case, that is not the main goal so you can
look at longer term investments for this fund.
IV. DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED PROGRAMS: Commercial Renewal, New
Economic Opportunities, and Demolition Assistance.
Director Medellin wanted to present these proposed programs for a second time, to get
additional feedback from the public and to get some direction from the board to see if the
programs are at least viable, to get some specifics on what the board would like to see, and
to look at actually taking action to allocate more funds for these future programs.
The board was presented an 11X17 handout that had pages of maps of the TIF#3 zone. The
first page was of vacant parcels and had different sub areas identified and numbered 1-7.
The next few pages were maps with a closer look at those 1-7 subsets. The maps showed
general location map and floodplain. He reminded the board that there were 400 plus vacant
properties discussed in the September update, now twelve of those lots are city owned. A
few of those are "not-for-sale-properties" because they were acquired after one of the floods
with FEMA funds and FEMA will not allow us to sell those. He stated that there are a wide
range of clusters, of partials, and added that the initiative would essentially eliminate
obstacles for a potential commercial developer to allow the city to do the lead work.
Essentially acquiring one of these clusters, or portions of these clusters, through the various
property owners. Thus, allowing us to combine them to promote and advertise a large tract
of land, or sizeable tract of land, suitable for commercial development. When the land is
sold, the net proceeds from the sale will come back to the board to invest again.
It was asked who the broker would be, and Director Medellin said the City of Wichita
Falls' Property Management Administrator would likely be used in that position. The different
subsets/areas were discussed, and subsets one and seven were found to have a lot of
potential with the already established businesses in those areas, the higher traffic and the
history that would aid in adding development there. Subset one would be good for a strip
mall or additional medical offices and seven would be excellent for industrial, particularly
shipping and receiving warehouses.
Director Medellin mentioned Forward Falls and said he would reach out to them, as they are
working on their urban core initiative, which is broader than our typical greater downtown
redevelopment goals, which may cross over and apply to some of these areas. .4400
Page 25 of 53
Tax Increment Financing#3 Board Meeting PAGE 3 December 18,2025
Creating a subcommittee to come up with some recommendations for the board to act on
was discussed.
1110.
Councilman Brooks said he would like it if Vernon College could be brought in as an option,
to bring a campus to the TIF#3 zone. Commissioner Mahler said there are no formal
discussions about that happening, but it is being discussed and they are looking at all of their
options, and this area maybe should be another option.
Director Medellin continued on to the next program, Commercial Renewal. Within the TIF
zone, there are neglected and deteriorated commercial properties, but the land they sit on is
still suitable for new commercial development. This program would look at acquiring one of
these commercial properties that have a dilapidated structure on them, demolish them, and
then set that piece of land up for its next life. The zone has 183 parcels that have non-
residential structures on them, that would be everything from multifamily use,to churches, to
convenience stores, and even a few industrial uses. Some of these parcels are already
suitable for commercial redevelopment, it's just that there is an old structure there. This may
be an opportunity to step in and then create some new re-development on the site. Director
Medellin gave the board the suggestion of allocating $225,000, which would allow for the
acquisition and potential demolition of one of those structures. Depending on which site is
selected, that will determine how many. He said he has looked at some sites with an
appraisal of about $100,000, and he felt that for a building with that value, it could be
demolished for roughly the same amount. Noting that it will vary from building to building.
He told the board he would like to get their insight on the overall concept. Commissioner
Beauchamp said if you pick a subset (using subset one as a suggestion) and cleared
everything off those properties, replatted them into one plat, and then set it up for sale as a
commercial piece of property, there would be added value.
It was noted the City's Code Compliance Division identifies nuisance structures that are
unsuitable for habitation, and they begin the lengthy legal notification/search warrant process
which results in City Council determination to either order repair or demolition of the structure.
(This can be for multiple reasons, some being a collapsed roof or utilities are deteriorated
past the point of it being safe.) Director Medellin pointed out 12 parcels on the provided map
and stated that those properties all have a structure on them that are at some stage in that
process. Whether it's at the initial letter, or if they have had the City Council order the
demolition. He reiterated that the proposed $225,00 would be used to buy a specific piece
of property (that has a severely dilapidated structure), demolish it, then set it up for its next
commercial development use.
Commissioner Mahler pointed out the area by the overpass, and said there might be some
real interest in development other than retail, like manufacturing or something like that. He
said revamping a building might be a real advantage to the TIF3 program. He pointed out that
there is a lot of good property in that area. Director Medellin explained that even though some
of the buildings in that area may have a higher grade (that was given by the appraisal district),
the buildings may not be as usable, or would need major renovation.
It was stated that it would be better if the board concentrates on one or two areas,which would
make a better return on their investment. It would weaken the effort if they spread it out too
much.
Mr. Phillip Townsend asked how structures outside of the TIF zone are paid for when a
4410., structure is set for demolition, and asks if the structures that they would demo in the TIF zone
Page 26 of 53
Tax Increment Financing#3 Board Meeting PAGE 4 December 16,2025
can be paid for in the same way. Those are done primarily through the Community
Development Block Grant Funds. Director Medellin stated that if we were to try to undertake 4001.
one of those projects with the CDB grant funds, that would be the allocation basically for the
entire year, plus more.
CDB grant funds were discussed a little more, and it was said that the TIF board could
combine efforts with CDBG, if they plan a big project in one of these larger zones. It was noted
that CDBG funds could not be used in the flood zone.
So, the general concept that Director Medellin presented would be acceptable, however the
board would want to ensure that those funds are leveraged as much as possible. Then to
have a targeted effort in conjunction with the other program as well as any other private
investment. But there may be some more discussion specifically on the dollar amount.
The main subsets that the board has interest in for development are one,three, six and seven.
(Three being for the community cultural history there.) But it was noted that subset three is in
the floodplain.
The annual residential structures that the CDBG fund handles is about 10 structures a year
on average that get demolished, but there are about thirty added to the list every year. Some
of those come off the list because they do sell or are picked up by a contractor, or someone
willing to undertake the development. If that does happen, the Council will rescind the order
and allow the developer to go in and repair that structure. Director Medellin stated that the
number of properties that have a structure to be demolished grows faster than the rate that
we need to demolish them. This would allocate additional funds to help spur that cleanup of
the community. This one would have a broader approach since we would be specifically
targeting that blithe concern where we could include residential structures. Commissioner
Browne asked how do we get someone else to join with us to help bring interest to acquire
some of that property, and with the TIF zone to help make it feasible for them to do that? He
said this is what tonight's discussion has been. Director Medellin said investment follows
investment.
Mr. Townsend said if the board approves a $100,000 project,where does the 10% come from
for the investor, and asked how do you partner the private institutions locally to reinvest into
that with encouragement of participating in some partnership? Because he feels there won't
be a lot of people going after it. Director Medellin said it is an opportunity to bring in our
banking and financial institutions into this. There was continued conversation about this, and
it was stated that some known banking contacts will be brought into the conversation, and
maybe look at special financing, or financing opportunities for existing businesses in the area.
Additionally, realtors will be brought into the conversation, which might stimulate some activity
for development. The suggestion was brought up to have a tour of the area for bankers and
realtors to see the potential of the area. There would have to be a limited number of
participants from the board, so as not to get into issues, but forming a site selection
subcommittee could be possible,with a few key individuals on a trolley or something like that.
Since the zone doesn't have a higher population, Mr. Townsend suggested offering incentives
for businesses to come into the area. P&Z Commissioner Browne said you have to create a
way to get people engaged, you've got to create the feeling for someone to move now
because there's only a few of these available, and you need a few people to go first. You
need to find a way to get the people hungry for opportunity to bring them in to start talking to
us. Commissioner Mahler stated that making land available is something that's been done in
economic development all over. Saying, we've got a plot of land here, come build something
Page 27 of 53
Tax Increment Financing#3 Board Meeting PAGE 5 December 16,2025
on it. Commissioner Beauchamp said there could be incentives negotiated after the fact, like
providing utility services or something like that.
Subset seven was discussed further because of its close proximity to the business park and
can be used as warehousing or logistics support. It's not dependent on a customer base.
Also discussed was the potential of getting a parcel and investing the money into a building,
or creating a shopping strip. Conversation included why this didn't work in the past and how
have things changed that would make it work now.
Mr. Townsend discussed the 10% funding, and said the 10% helps, but it's not enough.
Councilman Taylor said he understands that the TIF board's role is not to be a financing
partner for a development. The 10% was laid out because there were people who needed
funds from this program but couldn't put together a good solid application where they could
be competitive to get a grant. So, the 10%, and making it more, that's not the purpose or the
idea we came up with. There's not enough money in his opinion,to try and be a major investor
in particular project, or a couple more.
Director Medellin said the reason he brought these three proposed programs back was to
listen to the community and the public. To gain some insight on some of the community's
wants and needs. But he stated that what he is hearing on the demolition assistance, as long
as we are leveraging, that it is a program the board is looking to support. (Though there may
be more discussion on the funds and a specific dollar amount.) It was clarified that the projects
discussed today would come back to the board for approval. The demolition assistance would
be staff level, and go through our code compliance.
There will be additional work done by Director Medellin, and he will be sending out some
information to the board members. It was noted by Chairperson Haney that once people
found out that the TIF#fund was not for residential, that the interest of the public fell off. It
was discussed how to get the community engaged and interested. Having a confirmed
meeting date, having the board members reach out to give personal invites to churches and
non-profits might help. It was mentioned that tax abatements might be an incentive, but it
would be noted that that would have to come before the City Council. Mr. Dixon said we
need to educate the community in the language that the community will understand. There
were additional talks on how to make the program successful.
Director Medellin said appointing a subcommittee will be put on the next meeting agenda, as
well as the three programs.
V. OTHER BUSINESS
Next meeting: Thursday, January 29th, 2026 at 5:30 pm at the MLK Center.
VI. ADJOURN
Chairman Haney asked if anyone had any other comments. With no more comments being
made, Chairman Haney adjourned the meeting.
Chairman Haney adjourned the meeting at 7:11pm.
/ 4/f L'O4 ki . 2-h 10/1 ZS
Kenneth Haney, Chairperson Date
Page 28 of 53
LANDMARK COMMISSION
MINUTES
December 16, 2025
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Christy Graham ■Chairperson
Joel Hartmangruber •Vice Chair
John Dickinson • Member
JD Dixon ■ Member
Bill Enlow ■Member
Dr. Dawn Ferrell, Maj. Gen. (retired) ■ Member
Noros Martin U Member
John Yates ■ Member
Monica Aguon, Assistant City Attorney •City Staff
Karen Montgomery-Gagne, Principal Planner/HPO ■ City Staff
Robin Marshall, Admin Assistant ■ City Staff
ABSENT:
Janel Ponder Smith ■ Member
GUESTS:
Jessica Wood -(501 Indiana) ■Applicant
mow
I. Call to Order, Introductions and Welcome:
Chairperson Christy Graham called the meeting to order at 12:04 p.m.
Ms. Graham did introductions of Commission members, and guests attending.
II. Action Item: Design Review Case— 501 Indiana: Backdoor Theatre:
Request authorization to install 13 new exterior LED wall sconces/electrical conduit
on main building facades for up/down lighting options for improved
security/safety/visibility.
Applicant: Jessica Wood, Executive Managing Director of Backdoor Theater
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne explained that Ms. Wood had come to the Commission last
month with a request for lighting and new signage. At that time, the Commission
decided to table the motion for the lighting so there would be more time for the
Theater to find a specific lighting style that would meet the theater's needs for
increased visibility, safety and security.
Ms. Woods's proposal will still have thirteen LED wall sconces that will be attached
to the grout through two puncture points (two screws attaching the mounting plate).
The proposal also indicated that they are working with Syd Litteken, and Eddie
Johnson (E.J.'s after-hours electrical).
Photos were shown to the Commission of similar fixtures in the area to show what
low
Page 29 of 53
Landmark Commission 2 December 16, 2025
the effect will be. They can be utilized for up lighting to highlight the features of the
Icehouse/Theater (historic building), or for downlighting for the visibility, added
security, safety for performers/staff/patrons. Additionally, you can have both with
different color options. It is a bigger investment than the initial, more commercial
rectangular style light fixtures that were in the original proposal. The new style suits
the needs of what the theater is trying to accomplish. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne
stated that the placement of the lighting will be the same as the original proposal,
and they will be on the columns on the building. She referred the board members
to the book to view a picture where it was highlighted where the fixtures would be
on the extended columns on each of the four façades.
Installation specifications of the light fixtures were shown to the board and Ms.
Montgomery-Gagne discussed how they would be connected to the building. The
connection for either style of fixture will be in the grout, not the brick, so that should
not impact their final choice. Pictures in the Commissioner's books were referred to
so they could see photos of the building from the original ice house through the 90's,
and then on to today. The only direct impact to the building would be the point of
puncture of the mounting bracket, and then the extension of electrical conduit. It was
noted that some existing conduit on the exterior of the building will be removed.
Additional photos were pointed out to show the difference to the area from daytime
to nighttime with the current fixtures. It is extremely dark at night with the two current
fixtures on the Indiana facing façade because there is only one street light there.
There is no desire to remove any of the trees due to the aesthetic value that they
have, and can also be utilized for adding more decorative lighting.
Ms. Woods informed the board that if the fixture is approved, they plan to purchase
one of each, so they can actually see what it looks like. They are the same fixture,
just different sizes.
With no further comments or questions from the public, Chairperson Graham opened
the discussion to the Commission. There was discussion regarding the wattage and
location of the fixtures, but there was agreement that the theatre could mix and
match the fixtures. Also, on the taller parts of the building they might opt to consider
utilizing a higher wattage bulb in the same style fixture.
Chairperson Christy Graham introduced a motion to approve new construction
involving the installation of 13 exterior LED wall sconces with bulb wattage variable
as determined is needed for adequate up/down lighting. Light fixtures are to be
installed on the specified columns, with the fixture mounting plate attachment point
in the grout to the extent possible. Additionally, electrical conduit will be installed as
necessary to supply electricity to the new fixtures, and it will be affixed in the grout
lines instead of the historic bricks. Dr. Ferrell seconded the motion. The motion was
taken to vote by Chairperson Graham, and unanimously approved by a vote of 8-0.
Page 30 of 53
Landmark Commission 3 December 16, 2025
IV. Action Item: Design Review Renewal — 1701 Grant:
Request consideration for renewal of the design review case for rear garage
gutters/downspout system and a new dormer; approved in December 2024 (West
Floral Heights HD)
Applicant: Mr. Kevin Neil
Chairperson Graham explained the applicant was requesting an extension (renewal)
of the certificate of appropriateness (design review) approved on December 17,
2024, because the year deadline was tomorrow.
Ms. Montgomery-Gagne explained to the Commission an applicant can request an
extension or renewal as long as it is requested within the 30-day window before
expiration. Mr. Neil submitted his request in because he ran out of time during the
12mo period. He was able to complete the major component which included the
approved addition of the garage doors. (facing Grant and on the rear alley side.)
The Commission was provided pictures of the property in 2019, and the location of
the new garage bay was noted. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne reminded the board about
the stop work order that had been put in place (and why), and then mentioned the
case in December 2024, when the garage doors/dormer/downspouts &gutters were
brought before the board. Also highlighted from the prior case was work on the south
wall, and the installation of a one-hour fire resistant wall. (That work was completed
in accordance with building and fire code inspections.)
. Recent pictures of the site were presented that showed the garage door installed,
having the same design the board had approved. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne
mentioned the shingles that were approved, and pointed out the line where the
garage and the addition met, and said that line would be hidden by the approved
dormer that had yet to be installed. Staff informed the board that Mr. Neil wants to
move forward with the dormer and gutters/downspouts but experienced contractor
delays. The request seeks the Commission's consideration to renew the certificate
of appropriateness for an additional 12 months, so the owner/applicant can complete
the work in 2026 according to the requirements as outlined.
Mr. Joel Hartmangruber asked why they had roofed the structure without framing
where the dormer will be. Ms. Montgomery-Gagne answered that she believed it
was a timing issue with the insurance roofing claim. They were upgrading to a class
four on the house, and wanted to ensure the garage shingles matched.
Mr. Noros Martin made the motion to approve a design review extension for 1701
Grant for an additional 12-months, and Chairperson Graham seconded the motion.
Chairperson Graham took the motion to vote, and the motion passed 8-0.
III. Other Business:
a) Monthly Reports:
Chairperson Graham for the Depot Square HD:
Backdoor Theatre — Getting ready for their next show.
Page 31 of 53
Landmark Commission 4 December 16, 2025
Wichita Theatre:
• Murder on the Orient Express - On the Dinner Stage through the upcoming
Saturday(Dec 20th)
• The Grinch that Stole Christmas - On the Main Stage through the upcoming
Saturday(Dec 20th)
• Grand 01' Opry Christmas Show— December 22nd
Museum of North Texas:
• Home for the Holidays— Running through Dec. 20t1
• They are also taking nominations for legacies, people who have changed things
in North Texas as a legacy. They will announce the winners on Dec. 29th
b) Design Review: Staff Authorized — Minor Alteration/Repairs/Permits:
• Partial window replacement— 350 Morningside (information only)
• Gas/sewer line repair— 1315 Grant
• Roofing* — 1311 Tilden
• Roofing*— 1411 Hayes
*Composition shingle/same style; no design modifications
VII. Adjourn:
Staff recognized out-going member Mr. Noros Martin for his service on the Landmark
Commission as the P&Z Commission liaison. Noros was a dedicated board member
serving 3+years, between March 2021 and December 2025.
Chairperson Graham, thanked Mr. Martin for his service and adjourned the meeting
.000
at 12:30pm and stated the next scheduled meeting would be January 27, 2026 at
12:00 pm.
c;?/0/ .7:74,76
Christy G am, Chairperson Date
Page 32 of 53
•
MINUTES OF THE
WICHITA FALLS 4B SALES TAX CORPORATION (WF4BSTC)
JANUARY 8,2026
PRESENT:
Glenn Barham, President § WF4BSTC Members
Michael Grassi, Vice-President §
Nick Schreiber, Secretary-Treasurer §
Stephen Santellana §
Craig Reynolds §
Darrell Coleman §
Steve Garner §
Tim Short, Mayor § ,Mayor&City Councilors
Tom Taylor, Councilor, District 5 ` ""' §
Jeff Jenkins, City Manager § City Staff
James McKechnie, Deputy City Manager § '
Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager §
Blake Jurecek, Assistant City Manager §
Kinley Hegglund,•City Attorney §
Stephen Calvert, CFO & Finance Director §
Russell Schreiber, Public Works Director §
Monica Aguon, Deputy City Attorney §
Kalee Robinson, Parks & Rec Director §
Christ Horgen, PIO §
Paige Lessor, Executive Legal Assistant §
Michael Turner, Director § Falls Town Courts
Amy Harvey §
•
Moriah Williams, CEO .: § Forward Wichita Falls
Dr. Stacia Haynie, President § Midwestern State University (MSU Texas)
Anthony Inman, President § Inman Construction
Sgt. John Spragins, WFPD §
Tina Hanson, Senior Project Manager § Garver
ABSENT: §
1. Call to Order:
Mr. Glenn Barham called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m., noting that a quorum was
present.
2. Report of Financial Condition. • .. •
Mr. Paul Menzies directed the board to the financial reports in their packets. He noted that
WF4BSTC had received a return on the loan to WFEDC for the purchase of Sikes Senter Mall.
He also reported that the Backdoor Theatre project had officially hit the books. Additionally, Mr.
Menzies explained that he, along with'others, had toi.ired the 713 Indiana project site, and it had
finally reached completion. The final tranche of funding for that project will be paid out soon.
WFABSTC Minutes Page 1 of 6
01/08/2026
Page 33 of 53
Mr. Menzies explained that he did not include the most recent sales tax data in the meeting
materials because it would have been outdated by the time of the meeting. He then shared that
the most recent report, reflecting November sales,showed an increase of approximately 12%. He
clarified that this marked the third consecutive month of double-digit growth in sales tax and the
sixth consecutive month of overall improvement.
Anticipating that the Board would have further questions, Mr. Menzies asked Mr. Stephen
Calvert to provide additional insight. Mr. Calvert explained that the City receives detailed sales
tax data from the state, although some information is confidential at the individual company level.
At the industry level, however, he noted that more than half of the City's sales tax revenue comes
from retail trade, including local restaurants and commonly frequented businesses, and that this
sector has begun to recover, now showing an increase of approximately four percent. He further
reported that utility-related sales tax revenues were up by about 17 percent and that
manufacturing activity was also improving. Mr. Calvert emphasized that after several years of
relatively flat sales tax performance, the City is now experiencing multiple consecutive months of
growth, returning to normal levels and, in some cases, exceeding historical norms. He concluded
by expressing gratitude for the positive trend in sales tax revenues.
3. Consent Agenda:
a) Approval of Minutes of November 6, 2025.
Mr. Michael Grassi moved to approve the consent agenda as presented.
Seconded by Mr. Stephen Santellana,with no further public comment, the motion carried 7-0.
4. Public hearing regarding a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to
assist in the planned renovations of the tennis facilities. at Hamilton Parkin Wichita
Falls.
•
Mr. Barham opened the public hearing at 3:04
Mr. Blake Jurecek introduced the item,. reminding the Board that a preliminary
presentation on the project had been made during =the prior summer. Since that time, the
project team and local tennis community have generated significant public support and
secured multiple financial commitments, prompting the City to formally request funding
consideration at this meeting.
Mr. Michael Turner, representing Falls Town Courts, presented the proposal on behalf
of the City. He explained that Hamilton Park serves as Wichita Falls' flagship tennis facility,
supporting leagues, lessons, junior academies, and adult programming. Despite its size and
activity level, the facility is no longer competitive with comparable tennis centers in Texas
and Oklahoma, which limits the City's ability to attract tournaments, visitors, and associated
hotel occupancy and tourism revenue.
Turner outlined existing facility limitations, including:
• Twelve outdoor courts only, with no enclosed courts " •
• An undersized pro shop ` •
• Insufficient restroom facilities
• Limited office and storage space
• Inadequate parking during peak usage
• Lack of ADA-compliant viewing areas and pro shop access
• He then detailed the proposed improvements, which include:
• Fully enclosed indoor tennis courts
• Two additional outdoor courts
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 2 of 6
01/08/2026
Page 34 of 53
• A new front-facing entry plaza
• Expanded pro shop and retail space
• Improved spectator and viewing areas
• increased restroom capacity
• Additional office and storage space
• ADA accessibility upgrades
The total estimated project cost was presented as approximately $5.5 million, with
major components including the indoor facility, entry plaza, concrete and drop-off expansion,
court renovations, and covered patio areas. Turner formally requested $1.5 million from the
Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation to assist in funding the project.
Turner also highlighted operational growth since Falls Town Courts assumed
management in 2023, noting an approximate 600% increase in participation compared to
2022 levels. Programming expansions included private lessons, group instruction, junior
academies, camps, adult leagues,.and tournaments. Staffing increased from six employees
to twenty-seven employees to meet program demand.
Dr. Stacia Haynie, President of Midwestern State University, spoke in support of the
project, emphasizing its value to MSU's tennis program and the broader community. She
explained that indoor courts would significantly enhance recruitment and player
development, providing a competitive advantage that few universities possess. Dr. Haynie
noted that expanded tournament hosting would strengthen the talent pipeline, support MSU
recruitment efforts, and increase regional and national visibility for Wichita Falls.
Mr. Turner then presented projected tournament opportunities and associated
economic impacts, including:
• NCAA spring and fall indoor invitationals
• USTA two-day and four-day tournaments
• Indoor junior national tournaments
• UIL and TAPPS district and regional events
He explained that Wichita Falls' status as a public indoor facility would uniquely
position it to host tournaments currently limited to very few locations statewide. In response
to a question from Mr. Nick Schreiber, Turner noted•that Houston is currently the only
consistent indoor-public venue hosting such tournaments, with limited availability elsewhere.
Projected economic impacts, based on Parks. and .Recreation formulas and City
modeling, estimated an annual return on investment of approximately $2.6 million, derived
from MSU events, USTA tournaments, and other sanctioned competitions.
Ms. Moriah Williams, representing Forward Wichita Falls, presented an economic
impact analysis modeled similarly to an industry expansion. She emphasized that while
estimates are conservative, the project would generate:
• Immediate capital expenditure impacts of approximately $1.4 million
• Approximately 35 part-time and seasonal jobs, with long-term potential for full-
time positions
• Increased sports tourism, which is a key factor in industrial recruitment and
quality-of-life evaluations
Ms. Williams noted that few industries demonstrate growth rates comparable to the
tennis center's recent expansion and stated that the project aligns strongly with broader
economic development goals.
WF4BSTC Minutes ' ' Page 3 of 6
01/08/2026
Page 35 of 53
Mr. Turner concluded by emphasizing Wichita Falls' historical identity as a "tennis
town," citing the City's high court density, centralized location, and proximity between venues
as major advantages for tournament hosting and participant experience.
Mr. Anthony Inman addressed the Board regarding project financing and timeline. He
stated that the total project cost is approximately $5.6 million, with roughly $4.8 million
already raised or committed, including foundation support and anticipated grants. Remaining
funding is expected to come from additional foundations and the local tennis community.
Inman explained that the City has already engaged architectural and engineering
professionals and outlined a projected six-month design phase followed by approximately
one year of construction. He emphasized that the project represents a rare opportunity to
leverage public funds at more than a 2-to-1 ratio through private and philanthropic
investment.
Mr. Nick Schreiber inquired about the cost of the covered patio and pro shop portion
of the project, noting that the estimate was approximately$1.75 million. Mr. Turner confirmed
the figure, and Mr. Inman provided historical and structural context for the cost. Inman
explained that the existing Hamilton Park Tennis Center infrastructure dates back to the
1960s and 1970s, with courts originally constructed in the•1950s and later overlaid. While the
courts remain structurally sound, ancillary facilities—particularly the pro shop and
restrooms—are significantly undersized and outdated: He clarified that the proposed work is
not an expansion of the existing pro shop but a complete demolition and rebuild to address
ADA compliance, restroom capacity, retail needs'for tournament players, and operational
demands during peak usage.
Mr. Inman further noted that the current pro shop.was rebuilt smaller than originally
planned after a 1979 tornado, resulting in long-standing functional deficiencies. The
proposed new facility would include expanded retail space, additional restrooms, changing
areas, and improved spectator accommodations.' Mr. Schreiber acknowledged that the
estimated construction• cost per square foot appeared reasonable given current market
conditions and asked whether the proposed square footage was•sufficient. Mr. Inman
responded that the design had been intentionally conservative for affordability, though
additional square footage could be justified to better meet long-term needs.
Mr. Nick Schreiber also asked about usage distinctions between Hamilton .Park and
Weeks Park. Turner confirmed that Hamilton Park is dedicated primarily to tennis, while
Weeks Park functions as the City's pickleball facility, with limited overflow tennis courts.
Inman emphasized that USTA-sanctioned tournaments cannot be held on courts marked for
pickleball, making the separation of facilities necessary for tournament eligibility.
Mr. Steve Garner raised concerns regarding parking capacity. Mr. Inman explained
that the site is geographically constrained by surrounding.infrastructure, including a creek,
streets, and utility pipelines. While the proposed plan.includes minor parking improvements,
significant on-site expansion is not feasible. He noted that there is nearby parking and that
tournament operations could be supplemented by,shuttle or golf cartservice if needed.
Mr. Nick Schreiber then asked for clarification 'on the reported 600% increase in
participation, asking how much of the growth reflected repeat use by'members versus out-
of-town visitors. Turner explained that attendance figures are derived from the court booking
system, which logs each user entry. While repeat weekly usage by members is expected,
the system allows differentiation between members and non-members if further analysis is
requested.
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 4 of 6
01/08/2026
Page 36 of 53
•
The Chair invited' public comment, at which time Sgt. John Spragins, a long-time
member of the Wichita Falls tennis community, spoke in strong support of the project. Sgt.
Spragins described the renewed vitality of the tennis center, confirming that near-capacity
usage is now common and attributing the resurgence directly to improved management and
programming. He compared the proposed investment to prior City investments in softball
facilities, noting similar positive returns through tournament hosting and increased visitation.
Board member Stephen Santellana also spoke in support, sharing his personal
experience working at the tennis facilities during the peak tennis years of the 1980s and
1990s. He emphasized that the current growth mirrors those earlier high-demand periods
and credited Mr. Turner and his staff for revitalizing the program. Mr. Santellana highlighted
the loss of play days due to weather as a key justification for covered courts and noted the
broader community and youth development benefits already being realized.
Councilor Torn Taylor concluded the discussion by framing the project within the City's
broader quality-of-life goals. He stated that the proposed improvements align with priorities
frequently cited by residents and prospective employers, particularly regarding amenities that
attract and retain both families and industry. Councilor Taylor emphasized that investments
in recreational infrastructure, such as the tennis center, directly support economic
development and community vitality.
With no further questions or comments, Chairman Barham thanked the presenters
and participants.The public hearing on the Hamilton Park Tennis Center funding request was
formally closed at approximately 3:38 p.m.
5. Public hearing regarding a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to
support phase one(Ph. 1) of the design and renovation of the waterfalls adjacent to I-
44 and the Wichita River in Wichita Falls, otherwise known as The Falls.
Mr. Russell Schreiber addressed the Board, emphasizing that as Wichita Falls
continues to attract visitors and new.development, it is critical to address and improve one
of the City's most recognizable landmarks.-He explained that in early to mid-2025, the Board
directed City staff to evaluate the condition and operation of the Falls to determine whether
improvements could be made to enhance aesthetics and increase operational reliability and
frequency.
In response, City staff issued a request for qualifications and subsequently retained
Garver, an engineering firm, to conduct a professional evaluation. Mr. Russell Schreiber
noted that a summary of the findings would be presented to the Board, with certain portions
of the discussion occurring in.executive session.
Mr. Menzies reminded the Board that the Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation had
previously funded an engineering study focused or improving water quality at the Falls. As
part of that study, the structure itself—now approaching 40 years of age—was also
examined. During the course of the evaluation, engineers identified structural integrity
concerns that warranted further investigation.
Mr. Menzies explained that, due to the discovery of these issues, the Falls were shut
down as a precaution and have remained off since then. As a result, the City is requesting
$895,000 from the Board to fund additional structural analysis and engineering work. The
requested funding would allow the City to (1) complete a comprehensive structural
assessment of the Falls and (2) begin the design phase of a renovation project that would
address structural deficiencies, water quality improvements, and potential aesthetic
enhancements.
Chairman Barham asked if there were any.questions or comments from Board
•
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 5 of 6
01/08/2026 •
Page 37 of 53
members or the public. Hearing none, the Chair closed the public hearing at 3:41 p.m.
6. Executive Session.
Mr. Barham adjourned the meeting into executive session at 3:42 p.m. pursuant to Texas
Government Code sections 551.087, 551.071, and 551.072. He announced the meeting back
into regular session at 5:04 p.m. The subjects posted in the Notice of Meeting were deliberated,
and no votes or further action were taken on these items in executive session.
7. Consideration of a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to assist in the
planned renovations of the tennis facilities at Hamilton Park in Wichita Falls.
Mr. Santellana made a motion to approve funding not to exceed $1,500,000, to be
allocated over two fiscal years, to the City of Wichita Falls to assist with the planned renovations
of the tennis facilities at Hamilton Park Tennis Center, contingent upon completion of the
remaining fundraising. Seconded by Mr. Coleman, and after no public comment or further
discussion, the motion carried 7-0.
8. Consideration of a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to support phase
one (Ph. 1) of the design and renovation of the waterfalls adjacent to 1-44 and the Wichita
River in Wichita Falls, otherwise known as The Falls.
Mr. Coleman made a motion to approve funding not to exceed $895,000 to the City of
Wichita Falls for the cost of the detailed design, structural assessment, and procurement of a
construction manager-at-risk to support the renovation of The Falls. Seconded by Mr. Garner,
and after no public comment or further discussion, the motion carried 7-0.
9. Adjourn.
No further discussions took place, nor actions taken. Mr. Barham adjourned the meeting
at 5:07 p.m.
CAU ,
Glenn Barham, President
Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation
WF4BSTC Minutes Page 6 of 6
01/08/2026
Page 38 of 53
MINUTES
LAKE WICHITA REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE
January 13, 2026
PRESENT:
Josh Whittiker, Chair ■Members
Steve Garner, Vice Chair
David Coleman, Secretary
Sharon Roach
Amy Bobrowitz
Mike Battaglino
Jack Roe
John Pezzano
Mark Moran
Ray Acuna
Kalee Robinson, Parks Director ■City Staff
Scott Powell, Parks Superintendent
Wes Duller, TP&W ■Guests
James York, TP&W
ABSENT: Matt Marrs, Austin Cobb (City Council Liaison), David Bender, Alicia Castillo
1. Call to Order: Josh called the meeting to order at 11:31
2. Approval of Minutes: November meeting minutes were approved unanimously. Note
that a meeting was not held in December.
3. Project Updates:
3.a. Veteran's Plaza Master Plan: David Coleman stated that the cost estimate for
construction of the third plaza, including the Thomas Fowler monument, is between
$200,000 to $250,000. The overall cost of the entire Master Plan, with all the elements,
is approximately $1.35 million. We have some fundraising to do. Josh will contact a
grant writer named Marvin Peevey to see what he would charge us to create and submit
some grant requests.
3.a.i. Daughters of the American Revolution Patriots Marker Project: Last meeting, the
Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval to City Council for installation of
the DAR's Patriot Marker on a metal pole at the Veterans Plaza, but we have not gotten
any status updates on this.
3.b.Lake Deepening: No change in status, since the Army Corps of Engineers is still waiting
for funding from the Federal Government.
January 13, 2026
Page 39 of 53
3.c. Parks Master Plan: Kalee stated that the City did NOT receive the TXDOT Grant for
the last section of the Circle Trail, along the shore of Lake Wichita. They will apply
again in 2027. Also, the Circle Trail construction at Lucy Park is underway but delayed,
they are not likely to meet their contract completion date of August 2026. The Parks
Dept has hired a Parks Planner, who is completing an inventory and asset management
system.
4. Discussion of Brick Sales and Fundraising Initiatives: David Coleman stated there
is one new brick order, with some more likely to be submitted soon. The balance in the
Wells Fargo account is approximately $92,000.
5. Other Business Matters: None.
6. Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 12:12 pm.
ftW l o1
sh Whittiker, Chair Date
January 13, 2026
Page 40 of 53
MINUTES
Tax Increment Financing #3 Board
January 15, 2026
PRESENT:
Kenneth Haney, Chairperson •Member
Councilman Tom Taylor •Member
Councilman Robert Brooks •Member
Sandra Gross •Member
Mark Beauchamp, Wichita Co. Commissioner •Member
Ray Dixon, Jr. •Member
Monica Aguon, Deputy City Attorney •Legal Dept.
Stephen Calvert, CFO •City Staff
Fabian Medellin, Development Services Director •Staff Liaison
Rita Miller, Neighborhood Services Manager •City Staff
Karen Montgomery-Gagne, Principal Planner •Staff Liaison
ABSENT:
Barry Mahler, Wichita Co. Commissioner •Member
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Mr. Kenneth Haney at 5:35 p.m.
II. PUBLIC HEARING:
MOHAMMAD KABIR, 1301 MLK JR. BLVD.
REGARDING A FUNDING REQUEST TO SUPPORT AN EXISTING CONVENIENCE
STORE (ZOOM ZOOM #5) WITH THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF NEW FUEL
PUMPS.
Mr. Fabian Medellin started the presentation with a brief history of Mr. Kabir's request. that
the board has one item on the agenda. He informed the board that after his presentation, Mr.
Kabir will speak with the board and after that the board will go into executive session for
discussion. After executive session the board will then come back and take some action.
Director Medellin cited that Mr. Kabir is requesting a total of $47,505, for 100% of the costs
associated with the purchase and installation for fuel pumps that are located at his store.
A clarification was made that the fuel pumps would be a single unit with pumps on both sides
and will only dispense gasoline.
Mr. Phillip Townsend also gave an update that the $47,505 was the original quote, and the
costs have increased by 3%, so they are requesting the board to consider the amount with
the increase included.
Director Medellin gave a quick description of where Mr. Kabir's store (Zoom Zoom) is located
and stated that Mr. Kabir is currently in a lease to own the entire strip center. (Though he
occupies just the one unit.) In presenting a timeline overview of the specific project, Director
Medellin explained that staff started working with Mr. Kabir in March of last year. The original
Page 41 of 53
Tax Increment Financing#3 Board Meeting PAGE 2 January 15,2026
request was in excess of a million dollars to rehab the entire strip center. Over the next several
months,the staff went over the third version of his petition(which is the one that was presented
to the board), it essentially just encompassed his suite. The improvements in the suite allow
him to sell produce and groceries, as well as upgrading the fuel pumps and canopy. That
request was approximately$120,000. (October 15th meeting). At that time, the board felt that
there wasn't enough information associated with the costs to provide funding. They provided
design assistance in order to help solidify that specific cost. It was more than that, up to
$10,000 reimbursement assistance.
On October 20th, staff met with Mr. Kabir for a pre-development meeting,just talking through
the ins and outs of the project. A couple team members went out to the site, and walked
through the building, to give their professional perspective on what it might take to proceed
with his proposed improvements.
November 5th, staff received that new cost estimate from his fuel provider. That was provided
to us through Councilor Brooks, that Mr. Kabir had provided to the Councilor.
On November 20th, staff received plans from Mr. Kabir's architect (Mr. Phillip Townsend).
However, there were some additions that may need to be added before staff could approve
set plans and issue permits. We are unable to reimburse the down payment that Mr. Kabir
has provided to the architect until we have plan sets that are eligible for permits.
Since November 20th, Director Medellin and staff have met with Mr. Kabir, Tim McMahill and
Phillip Townsend multiple times and have had multiple conversations (some scheduled and
some unscheduled). Director Medellin stated that he met with Mr. Kabir at his convenience
store a couple of times. Since the last meeting, Mr. Kabir has advised, and requested,
additional funding. The board has approved the façade improvement funding program. Which
being the only two financing options available to offer, they weren't sufficient for Mr. Kabir to
make those recent requested upgrades. Mr. Kabir requested staff present to the board his full
request for funding. In addition, Councilman Brooks requested a special meeting to address
this funding request in advance of the regularly scheduled meeting slated for January 29th
Director Medellin spoke about the purpose of the board, and some information that has been
given to him from the general public. There have been multiple inquiries regarding TIF money,
what the fund is for, how it can be used and so forth. He explained that this is not free money,
it is a partnership. This board has put together programs and financing options to partner with
the property owners/new developers/business owners' investment, so that we can support
your investment. Director Medellin emphasized funds are an investment. It's an investment
of the board, and an investment in the public, because that's where these funds came from.
We want to make sure that those investments are to businesses that are set up for the long
term. Because, if those investments are successful, the TIF program will also be successful.
Director Medellin recommended that the board invite Mr. Kabir into the executive session, so
that they have the opportunity to ask him some direct questions in regards to his business
operations and practices, to ensure that he is set up for that long-term success. Also, that we
adhere to those previously approved board funding mechanisms, or amounts, which have
been offered to Mr. Kabir.
Director Medellin presented the staff recommendations: Offer up to the 10% of the overall
project cost, or under the Façade Improvement Grant, which can qualify under equipment
Page 42 of 53
Tax Increment Financing#3 Board Meeting PAGE 3 January 15,2026
(which would be more beneficial to them to proceed that route).
Mr. Kabir was given the microphone and spoke a few words and answered numerous
questions from the board members. It was asked how much Mr. Kabir had invested of his
own money, and if he had documentation of payments, which he said he could provide. It
was pointed out that any private, financial information should be saved for executive session
and not discussed in the public meeting.
There was clarification made to whether Mr. Kabir had received any funds at this point from
either of the two TIF3 grant programs, which Director Medellin informed the board that he has
not. He stated that for the confirmed expenses, that Mr. Kabir had paid for, staff couldn't
reimburse him for that portion until those plans were ready to be permitted. Clarifying that
was for the design plans from the original request ($120,000). It ended up boiling down to
some improvements to allow for the new equipment for that project and improvements to the
bathroom facilities, to meet ADA compliance.
There was additional discussion regarding the underground fuel tanks, plans and any permits
needed. An electrical permit would be needed, and plans would be required for this element.
It was noted that if he was not modifying the tanks then there wouldn't be any additional
requirements from TCEQ for the fuel tanks. Mr. Kabir was asked about any
leakage/contamination from the old tanks, and he answered that they were good working
order. Lynd Fueling Systems, Inc. came to the site and assessed what would be needed, and
provided a complete listing of what's going to be updated for the tanks, fuel pumps and new
software, including the credit card system, training, regulations.
Mr. Townsend added that the primary emphasis is the gas pumps,and it is the highest priority.
Renovation and spending money, if it's not 100% funded, (renovating the bathroom) is of no
benefit to Mr. Kabir from an economic standpoint. The gas pump will provide economic input.
Mr. McMahill added that he has spent a lot of time at Zoom Zooms with Mr. Kabir, and the
citizens need those gas pumps functional.
There was discussion on how the addition of the new pump would benefit the community.
Director Medellin clarified that it is within the authority of the board to approve the full request
from Mr. Kabir. Prior policy would not have to be changed, and the board could do a "one
off."
Chairman Haney asked if there were any other comments and questions, and there being
none, at 6:01 p.m. Chairman Haney closed the public hearing.
III. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Chairman Haney stated that the board would be going into Executive Session at 6:01 p.m., in
accordance with the Texas Government Code section 551.087.
The board came out of Executive Session at 6:27 p.m.
IV. CONSIDERATION AND TAKE ACTION:
MOHAMMAD KABIR, 1301 MLK JR. BLVD.
REGARDING A FUNDING REQUEST TO SUPPORT AN EXISTING CONVENIENCE
STORE (ZOOM ZOOM #5)WITH THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF NEW FUEL
PUMPS
Page 43 of 53
Tax Increment Financing#3 Board Meeting PAGE 4 January 15,2026
Chairman Haney stated that the board will now go back into regular session at 6:29 p.m.
He then let the public know that subjects described in the certified agenda were deliberated
and no votes or further action was taken. Items discussed in executive session are to remain
confidential. Except as provided by law, no TIF3 member, staff member, legal counsel, or
any other persons present, may discuss or reveal the proceedings of an executive session to
persons not present during the executive session.
Chairman Haney asked if there was a motion for the request. Commissioner Mark
Beauchamp made the motion to approve a forgivable loan, of up to and not exceeding
$50,000.00,with first installment payment directly to the identified contractor[the down
payment that has been requested, with the amount to be updated]. The second
installment to be paid upon completion of the project and will be a 100%forgivable loan
if the business is still operational, and the pumps remain working at the end of the 3-
year term. If the business closes within that 3-year window, Mr. Kabir will pay a prorated
share back to the CitylTlF#3 fund. A performance agreement shall be signed. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Tom Taylor.
Chairman Haney asked if there was any additional discussion. There being no additional
discussion. The motion was taken to vote, and the motion passed unanimously 6-0.
V. ADJOURN
Chairman Haney adjourned the meeting at 6:32 p.m.
L . t-lq,.06.1u1� S 2o 2Kenneth Haney, Chairperson Date
Page 44 of 53
STRATEGIC PILLAR
Accelerate Economic
---j.--1 Growth Provide Quality
k),c. 4,4a I Infrastructure
TEXAS Actively Engage and Inform
B/t.{P,sic es,4'/dap Opre t!nftiP�. I the Public
Optimize Engagement with
City Council the City and City Services
March 3, 2026
Transmittal Letter
Agenda Item Number: 8.a.
Agenda Item Name: Ordinance abandoning and vacating a storm water detention
facility located at 3014 Seymour Road.
Council Action to be Taken: Consider and take action on proposed Ordinance.
Department Submitted: Property Management
Staff Contact:
Pat Hoffman, Property Administrator
1. PURPOSE / DESCRIPTION
This ordinance will allow Wichita Falls MHP, LLC to clear up any title defects on their
erected apartment complex at this address by vacating the original storm water
detention facility that was on-site prior to construction. This detention facility was
installed in 1998 and is no longer necessary or required for the parcel.
2. STAFF ANALYSIS / BACKGROUND / PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
All affected city departments have been notified, and Public Works has agreed to the
vacation and abandonment of the detention facility.
3. BOARD REVIEW / CITIZEN INPUT
N/A
4. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this ordinance.
5. FUNDING SOURCE
N/A
Page 45 of 53
6. TIMELINE
N/A
7. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
The detention facility document remains filed of record, and a clouded title will remain
on the parcel.
8. ATTACHMENTS
1 . Ordinance - MHP Detention Abandonment Agreement
Page 46 of 53
Ordinance No.
Ordinance abandoning and vacating a storm water detention
facility located at 3014 Seymour Road.
WHEREAS, Wichita Falls MHP LLC has requested to abandon and vacate the
existing storm water detention facility located at 3014 Seymour Road; and,
WHEREAS, all affected City departments have reviewed this request, and have
approved to close, vacate, and abandon the detention facility; and,
WHEREAS, it has been determined to be in the best public interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
Approval of this ordinance will authorize the City Manager or his designee to
execute an Abandoned and Vacated Detention Facilities agreement, in a form approved
by the City Attorney, with Wichita Falls MHP LLC, Inc.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 3rd day of March, 2026.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Page 47 of 53
Location Map
..' . :•:,'.., 12..,.'1'5. . .. :.'i, 1,,,,,,::::-. .7. ',,..'' ''-', ,,,i..... .. .
1 0,..:.7 '' '• :',,'''''''''' ' ' -'4'-''''‘._....'t
., ,.',', ..,,' A' la4 „H'''''': i ' ': I-'. '''' '• •'%'--,71', ,
°' • 41 '' - ''' 1 .4 1 . ".-",,)''', '
1.11.1..; • ,4. •MI' . ':., 1.,: 1 ' .,... '.-......:‹,
, " .' , .../ 1:740 • ' ".':'' '.:.",:;. 4.,
/ '--:•,,, I(..;.17.I. ',.:'' - `'r;'il
4,.,.
.-.,
l',. 11 • .,
t
1 , 1 I• F 1 Ll'" ' 1
IL.'
1W...4,. gill IRE 1 ,, . ,.. ...............,... . 1-, 'H .,' ."' • NM. r, ..,:1"''.- t •'" lajilt,411
. g 1 '• .4 , . - • ' . -77- ----.„...
° ... .... :iiii iNit , „..... ing-•,, ,, ", '''''1,:.' . , „ .-...-.----....„:„..."-. . . "1,,,,...'""),,, ' ''‘" '", ,",,°(
Re; 7. .
•,. r . ,• , •
,--iii. i it ,4, „._
t ‘'.,-, ..-1,- -.N., .
.•
..
•li.,,i,.„:" ..-). ,, r,
. - . ,,,,-,,.,.,,1„..-- " .,,,,i, i,, ., , ,,.-3... , ,„ /,,t ., ....,, ,.• -
an!.... ..-41,1,„;„.,',„--1 9•31 •„,, . „*. „6 I; .: ----<44*
,k, • ',......
: .•,.,..,tk, 7.1,, ,1°,.•"' ,, .,, ' "*106°"•--- , , .. ..,,,,
<-1 IrVilliR
'''i.r
'
.,
lifelff ., ..
. .
,.... ---Ni,,, ":,#,k.....!aik • .-----..
...°, -#42.,° ---,... .. •-•-...,
.."...„. „.,, , ...,
,1, ,. „----•
...--•
- .. .-.°
. ,/ • ''''','. .°.. i ° NC
. .491 ........--- .,--•• ..'„),' "..! ...„,...4,,,,,
. . ° ,,,I.", .; - ,,,,,,....# r: °• .#•-• ,_____„-- i, „,i-'-'"#,,.. .:,,,°,.."°°-.,, ,.;;;.°',.,;.,-- ..-,°,,. 1 ,.,•",,,,.:
, ,
,-... . , . .. .,..
. ._ .
.
It
, . -0. . ,• ;"k1
. V..: .., . ., .. ....
..
. I
.
7 • . i. ., III .*--.,,, ,
•
...
. , ' ... ,.'' .-- * ","""s4'iN, ," ., .
401rAti '4,-.... ''..'' ',::-.'°: ,:iiii 311. '',, .,... „.1,...„. ''°°. '',.. • : , ". .'.'.. 1 ' 117'''''11z:,/ .„."' i
..... , .
. .
, .
0. • g,
11.1;i:01 '
.
'OD A . . '.' A
... 4,,,,..„, 444, ., ' ., ...,. ."' / ..,., •°I.
. - W ,, MI
_
'kr, ' • ' ' Ailk•
'.'M . ,•''Y ' ' .' 'filii 1* .,:i".
•>"
Page 48 of 53
ABANDONED DETENTION POND AGREEMENT
STATE OF TEXAS §
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF WICHITA §
That the City of Wichita Falls, Wichita County, Texas hereinafter referred to as "City,"
acting by and through the City Manager or his designee, does hereby grant to Wichita Falls MHP
LP hereinafter "Owner", its successors and assigns, an abandonment of the DENTION POND
AGREEMENT, filed of record in the Wichita County Deed Records, Wichita County, Texas on
April 22. 1998, Volume 1998,Page 838; in and across that certain tract of land situated in Wichita
County, Texas, described as follows, to-wit:
Lot 1, MHMR Addition A-701, A 701-E
Agreed and executed in the City of Wichita Falls, Texas on this,the 3rd day of March, 2026
City of Wichita Falls
Paul Menzies,Assistant City Manager
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF WICHITA §
This instrument was executed and acknowledged before me this day of March,2026,by
Paul Menzies,Assistant City Manager, for the City of Wichita Falls,Texas.
Notary Public, State of Texas
AFTER RECORDING,RETURN TO:
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DIVISION
P.O.Box 1431
WICHITA FALLS,TExAS 76307
Page 49 of 53
Exhibit C
1
_
... 1 :, ,
Hit 1998:11441 ! '
f '
,.1 glo
1 i$
,i 1 gi
11!he,
• "..,-C'E-: ' 'il li 11/1[
. m
ir
k 1
P; .-.,
'-'` '',.-.--=-:- -,'-:—--•,' - -----1-- , "ft'C,..-', _
il. li
1
i i
p I 11.
1,..:4.::: •*-,_"'- r_.1-. ....1,..,,t _..,,,,_ ,.,4 '..r..-_:::,,:::._1,-..! 1,1 I 1 iiiii I,,!
1 ' 1 1
.--• .
•
I ' 1
1 1
1' .. _3
1;',' .,.-.- :' 1 ...i .__ ,- •.: ' -
• ••••••••11
- I ' '••
,At:•-•
‘,"' 1
-,-., lc _ • -
11 '''--.'-••—• -IF-.....—.L-.:1 •-•1 ,../
•
, , , , • olkap,..,.,__
1 . ., • ,_
•-• ,,,-_,,..--,- i,„,,-
'- il .. - le
1 ,- r•l'-f., ,
1 I
1 ' II .•---'-' , ..
... I
,•..1. • t ....
...• C.) '
- ,"• .: ! r.10-1—' 1 1`1 "•••_'`-' :110',': -1 — (
1
III
1'
ilr'l 0,1,11
1 _ .
' /.•.1, ..- •• ,,,,.i,
, , 1
. .,
N o'''I • , .
-
1'...;
. •
.• a
Iv
Filed for Record A.D. 19 at u'olock V 1
q., Recorded /42.„...e 074/ A.D. 19 qq,
,.., ,....
VERNON CANNON, Mork, County Court
•„'"1".4 -
-, Vichlto County, Texas
By Deputy
.'''''.:1.,',.:7,1,:p-,:.$:., '7:7777::•- 71;
•: ••,,,.. '',. k.64,-,, ,;!,' _
' p
„ . 773177;f7-T
. ...
• .4.-1''til,•3"- .-• 1.4i.. " . •1 A,,-+OSPer ',r r..U'l.' 1.trtl:....
: - :•,' . 0,.,.;••.:, A..c, , • ..!•• ',-,4,_
Page 50 of 53
STRATEGIC PILLAR
J Accelerate Economic
a
--J-1-1% Growth
!/��/J] Q Provide Quality
+✓//�tII I Infrastructure
TEXAS Actively Engage and Inform
B/t.{P,sic es,4'/dap Opre t!nftiP�. I the Public
Optimize Engagement with
City Council the City and City Services
March 3, 2026
Transmittal Letter
Agenda Item Number: 9.a.
Agenda Item Name: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional
services agreement with Joseph A. Ross, Architect Inc. for architectural and
engineering services, for the Hamilton Park Tennis Center renovation project.
Council Action to be Taken: Approval of Resolution
Department Submitted: Recreation
Staff Contact:
Kalee Robinson, Director of Parks & Recreation
1. PURPOSE / DESCRIPTION
This resolution will authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services
agreement with Joseph A. Ross, Architect, Inc. to provide architectural and engineering
services for the Hamilton Park Tennis Center renovation project.
2. STAFF ANALYSIS / BACKGROUND / PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
The City of Wichita Falls has completed the Hamilton Park Master Planning process for
the Hamilton Park Tennis Center, with the final Master Plan dated May 30, 2025,
prepared by Joseph A. Ross, Architect, Inc. The project has received significant
community and organizational support, with funding commitments from the 4B Sales
Tax Corporation, local foundations, USTA grants, and private donors toward the total
estimated project cost of $5,026,000.
The proposed project will implement major components of the approved Master Plan,
including construction of a new 27,500 square foot indoor tennis center with radiant
heaters and HVLS fans, a new 3,000-4,000 square foot pro shop, two additional
outdoor tennis courts, court enhancements, shade structures, a new entry plaza and
drive lane/drop-off, and an expanded parking lot. If approved, the design phase for
Page 51 of 53
architectural and engineering services will begin immediately and is anticipated to
continue through September 2026, after which the project will be advertised for
competitive bids. This agreement also provides for construction management services
during the construction period to ensure the project is delivered in accordance with City
standards, budget, and schedule.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
3. BOARD REVIEW / CITIZEN INPUT
This project has been recommended by the Parks Board and 4B Board.
4. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this resolution.
5. FUNDING SOURCE
Multiple funding sources will be used for this project including: 4B, Local Foundations,
USTA Grants, and private donations
6. TIMELINE
Design services will commence upon approval and are estimated to be completed in
September 2026.
7. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
If not approved, staff would need to seek an alternative architect for design and
engineering services in order to complete the renovation project.
8. ATTACHMENTS
1 . Resolution - Hamilton Park Renovation
Page 52 of 53
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional
services agreement with Joseph A. Ross, Architect, Inc. for
architectural and engineering services for the Hamilton Park Tennis
Center renovation project.
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved funding allocations from the 4B Sales
Tax Corporation, local foundations, USTA grants, and private donors in support of major
improvements to the Hamilton Park Tennis Center as identified in the Hamilton Park
Master Planning Document dated May 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the existing Hamilton Park Tennis Center facilities require significant
renovation and expansion to meet current and future community demand for tennis and
related recreational programming; and
WHEREAS, Joseph A. Ross, Architect, Inc. prepared the original Hamilton Park
Master Plan in 2025 and is uniquely familiar with the site conditions, proposed
improvements, and project objectives; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to retain professional architectural and engineering
services to complete design, bidding support, and construction-phase services for a fee
of 7.25% of the total construction cost for the Hamilton Park Tennis Center renovation
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services
agreement with Joseph A. Ross, Architect, Inc. for architectural and engineering
services for the Hamilton Park Tennis Center renovation project.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 3rd day of March 2026.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Page 53 of 53