Loading...
4B Sales Tax Corporation Minutes - 01/08/2026 • MINUTES OF THE WICHITA FALLS 4B SALES TAX CORPORATION (WF4BSTC) JANUARY 8,2026 PRESENT: Glenn Barham, President § WF4BSTC Members Michael Grassi, Vice-President § Nick Schreiber, Secretary-Treasurer § Stephen Santellana § Craig Reynolds § Darrell Coleman § • Steve Garner § Tim Short, Mayor § ,Mayor&City Councilors Tom Taylor, Councilor, District 5 ` § Jeff Jenkins, City Manager § City Staff James McKechnie, Deputy City Manager § ' Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager § Blake Jurecek, Assistant City Manager § Kinley Hegglund,•City Attorney § Stephen Calvert, CFO & Finance Director § Russell Schreiber, Public Works Director § Monica Aguon, Deputy City Attorney § Kalee Robinson, Parks & Rec Director § Christ Horgen, PIO § Paige Lessor, Executive Legal Assistant § Michael Turner, Director § Falls Town Courts Amy Harvey § Moriah Williams, CEO , • • § Forward Wichita Falls Dr. Stacia Haynie, President § Midwestern State University (MSU Texas) Anthony Inman, President § Inman Construction Sgt. John Spragins, WFPD • • § Tina Hanson, Senior Project Manager § Garver ABSENT: § 1. Call to Order: Mr. Glenn Barham called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m., noting that a quorum was present. 2. Report of Financial Condition. • .. • Mr. Paul Menzies directed the board to the financial reports in their packets. He noted that WF4BSTC had received a return on the loan to WFEDC for the purchase of Sikes Senter Mall. He also reported that the Backdoor Theatre project had officially hit the books. Additionally, Mr. Menzies explained that he, along with'others, had toured the 713 Indiana project site, and it had finally reached completion. The final tranche of funding for that project will be paid out soon. WFABSTC Minutes Page 1 of 6 01/08/2026 Mr. Menzies explained that he did not include the most recent sales tax data in the meeting materials because it would have been outdated by the time of the meeting. He then shared that the most recent report, reflecting November sales,showed an increase of approximately 12%. He clarified that this marked the third consecutive month of double-digit growth in sales tax and the sixth consecutive month of overall improvement. Anticipating that the Board would have further questions, Mr. Menzies asked Mr. Stephen Calvert to provide additional insight. Mr. Calvert explained that the City receives detailed sales tax data from the state, although some information is confidential at the individual company level. At the industry level, however, he noted that more than half of the City's sales tax revenue comes from retail trade, including local restaurants and commonly frequented businesses, and that this sector has begun to recover, now showing an increase of approximately four percent. He further reported that utility-related sales tax revenues were up by about 17 percent and that manufacturing activity was also improving. Mr. Calvert emphasized that after several years of relatively flat sales tax performance, the City is now experiencing multiple consecutive months of growth, returning to normal levels and, in some cases, exceeding historical norms. He concluded by expressing gratitude for the positive trend in sales tax revenues. 3. Consent Agenda: a) Approval of Minutes of November 6, 2025. Mr. Michael Grassi moved to approve the consent agenda as presented. Seconded by Mr. Stephen Santellana,with no further public comment, the motion carried 7-0. 4. Public hearing regarding a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to assist in the planned renovations of the tennis facilities. at Hamilton Parkin Wichita Falls. • Mr. Barham opened the public hearing at 3:04 Mr. Blake Jurecek introduced the item,. reminding the Board that a preliminary presentation on the project had been made during =the prior summer. Since that time, the project team and local tennis community have generated significant public support and secured multiple financial commitments, prompting the City to formally request funding consideration at this meeting. Mr. Michael Turner, representing Falls Town Courts, presented the proposal on behalf of the City. He explained that Hamilton Park serves as Wichita Falls' flagship tennis facility, supporting leagues, lessons, junior academies, and adult programming. Despite its size and activity level, the facility is no longer competitive with comparable tennis centers in Texas and Oklahoma, which limits the City's ability to attract tournaments, visitors, and associated hotel occupancy and tourism revenue. Turner outlined existing facility limitations, including: • Twelve outdoor courts only, with no enclosed courts • • An undersized pro shop ` • • Insufficient restroom facilities • Limited office and storage space • Inadequate parking during peak usage • Lack of ADA-compliant viewing areas and pro shop access • He then detailed the proposed improvements, which include: • Fully enclosed indoor tennis courts • Two additional outdoor courts WF4BSTC Minutes Page 2 of 6 01/08/2026 • A new front-facing entry plaza • Expanded pro shop and retail space • Improved spectator and viewing areas • increased restroom capacity • Additional office and storage space • ADA accessibility upgrades The total estimated project cost was presented as approximately $5.5 million, with major components including the indoor facility, entry plaza, concrete and drop-off expansion, court renovations, and covered patio areas. Turner formally requested $1.5 million from the Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation to assist in funding the project. Turner also highlighted operational growth since Falls Town Courts assumed management in 2023, noting an approximate 600% increase in participation compared to 2022 levels. Programming expansions included private lessons, group instruction, junior academies, camps, adult leagues,and tournaments. Staffing increased from six employees to twenty-seven employees to meet program demand. Dr. Stacia Haynie, President of Midwestern State University, spoke in support of the project, emphasizing its value to MSU's tennis program and the broader community. She explained that indoor courts would significantly enhance recruitment and player development, providing a competitive advantage that few universities possess. Dr. Haynie noted that expanded tournament hosting would strengthen the talent pipeline, support MSU recruitment efforts, and increase regional and national visibility for Wichita Falls. Mr. Turner then presented projected tournament opportunities and associated economic impacts, including: • NCAA spring and fall indoor invitationals • USTA two-day and four-day tournaments • Indoor junior national tournaments • UIL and TAPPS district and regional events He explained that Wichita Falls' status as a public indoor facility would uniquely position it to host tournaments currently limited to very few locations statewide. In response to a question from Mr. Nick Schreiber, Turner noted•that Houston is currently the only consistent indoor'public venue hosting such tournaments, with limited availability elsewhere. Projected economic impacts, based on Parks and Recreation formulas and City modeling, estimated an annual return on investment of approximately $2.6 million, derived from MSU events, USTA tournaments, and other sanctioned competitions. Ms. Moriah Williams, representing Forward Wichita Falls, presented an economic impact analysis modeled similarly to an industry expansion. She emphasized that while estimates are conservative, the project would generate: • Immediate capital expenditure impacts of approximately $1.4 million • Approximately 35 part-time and seasonal jobs, with long-term potential for full- time positions • Increased sports tourism, which is a key factor in industrial recruitment and quality-of-life evaluations Ms. Williams noted that few industries demonstrate growth rates comparable to the tennis center's recent expansion and stated that the project aligns strongly with broader economic development goals. WF4BSTC Minutes ' ' Page 3 of 6 01/08/2026 Mr. Turner concluded by emphasizing Wichita Falls' historical identity as a "tennis town," citing the City's high court density, centralized location, and proximity between venues as major advantages for tournament hosting and participant experience. Mr. Anthony Inman addressed the Board regarding project financing and timeline. He stated that the total project cost is approximately $5.6 million, with roughly $4.8 million already raised or committed, including foundation support and anticipated grants. Remaining funding is expected to come from additional foundations and the local tennis community. Inman explained that the City has already engaged architectural and engineering professionals and outlined a projected six-month design phase followed by approximately one year of construction. He emphasized that the project represents a rare opportunity to leverage public funds at more than a 2-to-1 ratio through private and philanthropic investment. Mr. Nick Schreiber inquired about the cost of the covered patio and pro shop portion of the project, noting that the estimate was approximately$1.75 million. Mr. Turner confirmed the figure, and Mr. Inman provided historical and structural context for the cost. Inman explained that the existing Hamilton Park Tennis Center infrastructure dates back to the 1960s and 1970s, with courts originally constructed in the•1950s and later overlaid. While the courts remain structurally sound, ancillary facilities—particularly the pro shop and restrooms—are significantly undersized and outdated: He clarified that the proposed work is not an expansion of the existing pro shop but a complete demolition and rebuild to address ADA compliance, restroom capacity, retail needs'for tournament players, and operational demands during peak usage. Mr. Inman further noted that the current pro shop.was rebuilt smaller than originally planned after a 1979 tornado, resulting in long-standing functional deficiencies. The proposed new facility would include expanded retail space, additional restrooms, changing areas, and improved spectator accommodations.' Mr. Schreiber acknowledged that the estimated construction• cost per square foot appeared reasonable given current market conditions and asked whether the proposed square footage was sufficient. Mr. Inman responded that the design had been intentionally conservative for affordability, though additional square footage could be justified to better meet long-term needs. Mr. Nick Schreiber also asked about usage distinctions between Hamilton .Park and Weeks Park. Turner confirmed that Hamilton Park is dedicated primarily to tennis, while Weeks Park functions as the City's pickleball facility, with limited overflow tennis courts. Inman emphasized that USTA-sanctioned tournaments cannot be held on courts marked for pickleball, making the separation of facilities necessary for tournament eligibility. Mr. Steve Garner raised concerns regarding parking capacity. Mr. Inman explained that the site is geographically constrained by surrounding.infrastructure, including a creek, streets, and utility pipelines. While the proposed plan.includes minor parking improvements, significant on-site expansion is not feasible. He noted that there is nearby parking and that tournament operations could be supplemented by;shuttle or golf cartservice if needed. Mr. Nick Schreiber then asked for clarification `on the reported 600% increase in participation, asking how much of the growth reflected repeat use by'members versus out- of-town visitors. Turner explained that attendance figures are derived from the court booking system, which logs each user entry. While repeat weekly usage by members is expected, the_system allows differentiation between members and non-members if further analysis is requested. . WF4BSTC Minutes Page 4 of 6 01/06/2026 • The Chair invited' public comment, at which time Sgt. John Spragins, a long-time member of the Wichita Falls tennis community, spoke in strong support of the project. Sgt. Spragins described the renewed vitality of the tennis center, confirming that near-capacity usage is now common and attributing the resurgence directly to improved management and programming. He compared the proposed investment to prior City investments in softball facilities, noting similar positive returns through tournament hosting and increased visitation. Board member Stephen Santellana also spoke in support, sharing his personal experience working at the tennis facilities during the peak tennis years of the 1980s and 1990s. He emphasized that the current growth mirrors those earlier high-demand periods and credited Mr. Turner and his staff for revitalizing the program. Mr. Santellana highlighted the loss of play days due to weather as a key justification for covered courts and noted the broader community and youth development benefits already being realized, Councilor Torn Taylor concluded the discussion by framing the project within the City's broader quality-of-life goals. He stated that the proposed improvements align with priorities frequently cited by residents and prospective employers, particularly regarding amenities that attract and retain both families and industry. Councilor Taylor emphasized that investments in recreational infrastructure, such as the tennis center, directly support economic development and community vitality. With no further questions or comments, Chairman Barham thanked the presenters and participants.The public hearing on the Hamilton Park Tennis Center funding request was formally closed at approximately 3:38 p.m. 5. Public hearing regarding a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to support phase one(Ph. 1) of the design and renovation of the waterfalls adjacent to I- 44 and the Wichita River in Wichita Falls, otherwise known as The Falls. Mr. Russell Schreiber addressed the Board, emphasizing that as Wichita Falls continues to attract visitors and new.development, it is critical to address and improve one of the City's most recognizable landmarks.-He explained that in early to mid-2025, the Board directed City staff to evaluate the condition and operation of the Falls to determine whether improvements could be made to enhance aesthetics and increase operational reliability and frequency. In response, City staff issued a request for qualifications and subsequently retained Garver, an engineering firm, to conduct a professional evaluation. Mr. Russell Schreiber noted that a summary of the findings would be presented to the Board, with certain portions of the discussion occurring inexecutive session. Mr. Menzies reminded the Board that the Wichita falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation had previously funded an engineering study focused on-improving water quality at the Falls. As part of that study, the structure itself—now approaching 40 years of age—was also examined. During the course of the evaluation, engineers identified structural integrity concerns that warranted further investigation. Mr. Menzies explained that, due to the discovery of these issues, the Falls were shut down as a precaution and have remained off since then. As a result, the City is requesting $895,000 from the Board to fund additional structural analysis and engineering work. The requested funding would allow the City to (1) complete a comprehensive structural assessment of the Falls and (2) begin the design phase of a renovation project that would address structural deficiencies, water quality improvements, and potential aesthetic enhancements. Chairman Barham asked if there were any.questions or comments from Board • WF4BSTC Minutes Page 5 of 6 01/08/2026 • members or the public. Hearing none, the Chair closed the public hearing at 3:41 p.m. 6. Executive Session. Mr. Barham adjourned the meeting into executive session at 3:42 p.m. pursuant to Texas Government Code sections 551.087, 551.071, and 551.072. He announced the meeting back into regular session at 5:04 p.m. The subjects posted in the Notice of Meeting were deliberated, and no votes or further action were taken on these items in executive session. 7. Consideration of a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to assist in the planned renovations of the tennis facilities at Hamilton Park in Wichita Falls. Mr. Santellana made a motion to approve funding not to exceed $1,500,000, to be allocated over two fiscal years, to the City of Wichita Falls to assist with the planned renovations of the tennis facilities at Hamilton Park Tennis Center, contingent upon completion of the remaining fundraising. Seconded by Mr. Coleman, and after no public comment or further discussion, the motion carried 7-0. 8. Consideration of a funding request from the City of Wichita Falls to support phase one (Ph. '1) of the design and renovation of the waterfalls adjacent to 1-44 and the Wichita River in Wichita Falls, otherwise known as The Falls. Mr. Coleman made a motion to approve funding not to exceed $895,000 to the City of Wichita Falls for the cost of the detailed design, structural assessment, and procurement of a construction manager-at-risk to support the renovation of The Falls. Seconded by Mr. Garner, and after no public comment or further discussion, the motion carried 7-0. 9. Adjourn. No further discussions took place, nor actions taken. Mr. Barham adjourned the meeting at 5:07 p.m. Glenn Barham, President Wichita Falls 4B Sales Tax Corporation WF4BSTC Minutes Page 6 of 6 01/08/2026