Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - 11/10/1999MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
November 10, 1999
PRESENT:
David Rhone, Chairman
Cliff Berg
Lou Ann Phillips
Lin Purtle
Danny Richardson
Rusty Sons
Randy Wachsman
Greg Wright
Bruce Harris
Ken Birck (seated in audience, did not vote)
David A. Clark, Director of Community Development
Steve Seese, Planning Administrator
Paul Stillson, Planner II
Diane Parker, Recording Secretary
ABSENT:
Earl Rooks
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rhone at 2:00 p.m.
11. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No one from the audience wished to address the Commission.
M
la -$ --99
. Members
• Alternate #1
• Alternate #2
Staff
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Wright made a motion to approve the minutes of the October 13, 1999 meeting. Mr. Berg seconded the
motion. The minutes were approved with a unanimous vote.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
Public Hearing on Preliminary Plats
• Provide utility and drainage easements as required by utility companies and the Director of Public
Works.
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 1
• Submit water and sewer plans to the Utilities Engineer; water plans to the Fire Marshall and street,
sidewalk and drainage plans to the Director of Public Works. Drainage plans must be complete
enough to include impact on surrounding property and include detention facilities as required by
Director of Public Works.
• Coordinate street lighting plan and provide utility easements as required by the Director of Traffic
and Transportation.
• Submit two (2) copies of corrected preliminary plat to Planning Division before final platting.
Note: Approval of a plat does not imply development of property in violation of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Recommend approval subject to standard conditions and any specific conditions listed below:
1. Bridge Creek Estates (Nov. 99)
a. Show 10 ft. easement along east line of Lot 2, Block 2.
b. Redesign Joy Lane so that there is a definite division between Joy Lane and Shady Grove or seek
Council approval of a street name change for Shady Grove.
C. Coordinate medians with Parks and Recreation Director.
d. Identify platted commercial areas with boundary lines.
e. Show building limit lines on Lots 1,2 & 3, Block 10.
f. Identify lines drawn along the east line of Lot 3, Block 10.
g. Draw easement line along east line of Lot 3, Block 2.
h. Extend water and sewer to all unserved lots. (PUBLIC WORKS)
i. Construct all proposed streets and drainage improvements. (PUBLIC WORKS)
j. Provide stormwater detention. (PUBLIC WORKS)
2. Canyon Trails (Nov. 99)
a. Identify previously platted lots.
b. Complete boundary of Lots 106A & 136.
C. Consult with Director of Parks and Recreation for park dedication. If not accepted by the City, label
"Private Park."
d. All open spaces and park area shall be given lot numbers. (PUBLIC WORKS)
e. Extend water and sewer to serve all lots. (PUBLIC WORKS)
f. Construct all internal streets and drainage improvements. (PUBLIC WORKS)
g. Provide stormwater detention. (PUBLIC WORKS)
h. Provide detail of Turtle Creek Road and Canyon Trails Drive intersection. (PUBLIC WORKS)
i. Additional easements to be obtained from Biggs and Mathews. (TXU)
Public Hearing on Final Plats
• Provide utility and drainage easements as required by utility companies and the Director of Public
Works.
• Submit water and sewer plans to the Utilities Engineer; water plans to the Fire Marshall and street,
sidewalk and drainage plans to the Director of Public Works. Drainage plans must be complete
enough to include impact on surrounding property and include detention facilities as required by
Director of Public Works.
• Coordinate street lighting plan and provide utility easements as required by the Director of Traffic
and Transportation, if underground electric utilities are to be provided.
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 2
Recommend approval subject to standard conditions and any specific conditions listed below:
1. Airport Addition, Lots 1A & 2A, Block 1 (Nov. 99)
a. Provide signed copy.
b. Provide utility slips
C. Provide additional dimensions on the location of Texas Hwy. Department easement.
d. Lots 1A and 2A are served by water and sewer. (PUBLIC WORKS)
e. Provide stormwater detention. (PUBLIC WORKS)
2. Bridge Creek Estates, Lots 2 & 4, Block 2 (Nov. 99)
a. Provide 10 ft. drainage easement along the east line of Lot 2.
b. Show existing right -of -way for Medical Drive.
C. Extend water to serve Lot 2. (PUBLIC WORKS)
d. Lot 4 is served by water. (PUBLIC WORKS)
e. Lots 2 and 4 are served by sewer. (PUBLIC WORKS)
f. Provide stormwater detention. (PUBLIC WORKS)
3. Canyon Trails, Section six, Lots 58 -61 and 91 -94C and 134A (Nov. 99)
a. Provide signed copy.
b. Provide utility slips.
C. Label right -of -way width of "Some Circle" at Canyon Ridge.
d. Provide desired street name for "Some Circle" use "Court" instead of "Circle."
e. Extend water and sewer to serve all lots. (PUBLIC WORKS)
f. Extend streets to serve lots. (PUBLIC WORKS)
g. Provide stormwater detention. (PUBLIC WORKS)
h. Do not need blanket utility easements for Lots 136A & 94C. If specific utilities are to be placed in
these lots, show 15 foot utility easements in their proposed locations. (PUBLIC WORKS)
i. Show sanitary sewer easements as utility easements. (PUBLIC WORKS)
j. Sanitary sewer easement on Lot 61 shall be 15 feet. (PUBLIC WORKS)
k. Additional easements to be obtained from Biggs and Mathews. (TXU)
I. Label open space "Private." (PARKS)
4. Lane's Wash Addition, Block 1, Lot 1 (Nov. 99)
a. Dedicate right -of -way at the intersection of Brook and Kell for a 50 ft. radius turn lane as required by
TxDOT.
b. Lot is served by water and sewer. (PUBLIC WORKS)
C. Show existing 8" sewer line crossing property and dedicate a 15 foot easement for sewer line.
d. All driveways along Kell Blvd. Require TxDOT approval.
S. USPS /Hatton Addition, Block 1, Lot 1 (Nov. 99)
a. Delete "for road purposes" from right -of -way dedication.
b. Show 25 foot building limit line measured from the new property line along Hatton Road. Show
boundary of Hatton with a solid line. Label 70 ft. right -of -way as "previously dedicated ".
C. Provide 15 ft. utility easement as required by TXU
d. Provide 15 ft. utility easement described by Keith Cook (405) 416 -8162 of C.H. Guernsey & Company,
the civil engineers for this plat.
e. Provide statement of acknowledgment for the signature of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Chairman and Secretary.
f. Provide signed utility clearance forms.
g. Provide owner, notary, and surveyor's signatures.
h. Place note on plat: "Property is adjacent to Kickapoo Airport runway. Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) approval is required prior to constructing any vertical structures on this property."
i. Lot is served by water and sewer. (PUBLIC WORKS)
j. Provide stormwater detention. (PUBLIC WORKS)
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 3
k. Additional easements to be obtained. (TXU)
Mr. Harris made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Ms. Purtle seconded the motion. The Consent
Agenda passed with a unanimous vote in favor.
V. REGULAR AGENDA
1. Revocation of a Conditional Use Permit
Neon Spur, 202 North Burnett
Case C 99 -18
Mr. Sons made a motion to approve the revocation of their permit. Mr. Wright seconded the motion.
Mr. Seese stated the Neon Spur has recently begun compliance with the condition to install a sound wall.
Mr. Seese commented that substantial progress has been made and staff would like to withdraw this item
from the agenda.
2. Rezone from MFR to GC(c)
4.99 Acres out of Lot 10, Block 19, Fountain Park Section 4 -A
Case R 99 -12
Applicant .............. .............................R. J. Wachsman
Requested Action: ............................ Rezone from Multifamily to General Commercial Conditioned zoning.
Purpose: ........................................... For future commercial development.
Property: ................. ...........................4.99 acres out of Lot 10, Block 19, Fountain Park, Section 4 -A
Existing Land Use: ............................ Vacant
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:...... N: Fountain Park Subdivision, SF -2
S: Vacant Land, GC
E: Rolling Meadows, MFR
W: Vacant Land, GC
Analysis:
The property is 4.99 acres out of Lot 10, Block 19, Fountain Park, Section 4 -A. It is the western portion of a
platted lot occupied by Rolling Meadows Retirement Complex. The owners of Rolling Meadows have sold
the tract as excess property. To the north is Cromwell Avenue, a portion of Fountain Park. Cromwell
Avenue has recently been extended. No homes have been constructed along the new section of street.
The Board of Commerce and Industry and the owners of the property have been pursuing a major employer
that is expected to hire several hundred employees. The use is expected to be an office building. Due to
confidentiality, the developers are not able to release the name of the potential employer. The buyers have
a limited amount of time to make their decision, and require that the zoning is appropriate for their use.
With a typical rezoning request, the Commission hears the case on the second Wednesday of the month.
The City Council then receives the proposed ordinance with the Commission's recommendation for action
on the first Tuesday of the following month. Because of the unique circumstances associated with this
request the City Council is being asked to respond to the rezoning recommendation at the soonest possible
date: November 16`h. The staff has prepared a schedule that will meet the zoning ordinance notification
requirements and the requested accelerated timetable.
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 4
Due to the location of the parcel in question, typical rezoning signs would not be effective since there is no
street frontage that would provide the customary notice of this action. Therefore, extraordinary measures
are being taken to provide public notice. An adjacent property owner has agreed to allow his property to be
used for placing a much larger sign notifying of the rezoning along the Kell Freeway frontage.
The developers and staff have negotiated a "conditioned" zoning district because of this property's proximity
to residential development.
The 4.99 -acre tract is adjacent to existing general commercial property along Kell frontage roads. If the
property is rezoned, it will be combined with property on the frontage roads, and will not take access from
Cromwell Avenue. The usual buffering requirement of a six -foot tall fence and the 30 -foot setback from
residential boundaries will apply.
a. Changed conditions: Staff analyzed the rezoning to identify conditions that have changed in the
district or may have changed outside the district that directly or indirectly affect land use adjacency.
The property is no longer useable by the retirement complex for multifamily. With the change in
ownership it can now be combined with existing general commercial lands along Kell, an area
already identified for commercial development.
b. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan: Staff considered the effects of the land uses allowed under
that proposed zoning district relative to conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Plan
currently designates this tract as High Density Residential.
C. The nature and degree of impact upon neighboring lands: This property is adjacent to existing
commercial zoning. Its location will not increase commercial traffic into the neighborhood above
what the current zoning will allow. The "conditioned" district will ensure compatibility of uses with
surrounding residences.
If this rezoning were approved, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from High Density Residential to
Commercial would be required.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of this rezoning.
Four surrounding property owners were notified of this request. Three (3) or 76.80% replied in favor and
one (1) or 23.20% was opposed. These percentages were calculated by taking the actual square footage
owned by each property owner plus 50% of any right -of -way adjacent to their property divided by the total
square footage of land within 200 feet of the perimeter of this plat.
Ms. Phillips made a motion to recommend approval of this request to Council. Mr. Richardson seconded the
motion.
Mr. Seese stated the negative response was received from Rolling Meadows. They stated they were
concerned about the proposed location being a competitive type retirement facility. Mr. Seese stated that
the current zoning is Multifamily, which would permit a use exactly like Rolling Meadows without any zoning
changes or this Commission's approval.
Chairman Rhone stated that Mr. Wachsman would abstain from voting on this case.
Mr. Henry Dvorkin, incoming Chairman of the Board for Rolling Meadows, stated that competition was not
the main concern but the right of quiet enjoyment for their elderly clients was foremost. He further stated he
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 5
met with Mr. Schaaf and Mr. Wachsman and based on their representations, he would like to withdraw the
objection.
Mr. Harold Appell, 2913 Radney Lane, stated that the water runoff from that area would come down the
small drainage ditch. He questioned why Wal -Mart had to build a wide ditch but the ditch on McNiel is only a
few feet wide. Mr. Seese responded that the detention facilities that Wal -Mart is building are required by the
City's stormwater detention ordinance, which requires a zero impact. The same ordinance is in effect for
this location and they will be required to have zero impact on the surrounding lands.
The recommendation for rezoning passed with a vote of nine (9) in favor and none (0) opposed.
3. Rezone from SF -2 to GC
3.07 Acres out of Blocks 8 & 17, Denton County School Lands League 1
Case R 99 -13
Applicant: ...........................John Denman, President, T -Bird Properties
Ray Clymer, President, Lake Wellington Development Co.
Requested Action: ............................ Rezone from Single Family to General Commercial
Purpose: ......... ............................For future commercial development.
Property: ........................................... 3.07 ac. out of Blocks 8 & 17, Denton County School Lands League
Existing Land Use: ............................ Vacant
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:...... N: Lake Wellington Lake, SF -2
S: Kell Freeway, SF -2
E: Morning Star Retirement Complex, MFR
W: Vacant Land, GC
Analysis:
The property is a 3.07 acre tract located along the westbound Kell access Road. To the north and west of
here is General Commercial zoning. The property is the last remaining single family zoned property along
this section of Kell.
There have been three rezonings in this general area. To the north, 17.94 acres were rezoned from Single
Family to General Commercial in January 1995 for an apartment complex. To the east 4.51 acres was
rezoned to from Single Family -2 to Multifamily in December 1995 for the Morning Star retirement complex.
In May 1998, a 5.1 acre tract east of Morning Star was rezoned from Single Family to Multifamily.
This tract is also one of several sites under consideration by a major employer. As described in the Case R
99 -12, the Board of Commerce and Industry has asked for an accelerated rezoning process. The staff has
prepared a schedule that will meet the zoning ordinance notification requirements for a hearing by the City
Council on November 16'.
a. Changed conditions: Staff analyzed the rezoning to identify conditions that have changed in
the district or may have changed outside the district that directly or indirectly affect land use
adjacency. As the Lake Wellington Estates developed, subsequent rezoning requests were
approved. The property's suitability for single family development has diminished.
b. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan: Staff considered the effects of the land uses
allowed under that proposed zoning district relative to conformance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The Plan currently designates this tract as Low Density Residential.
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 6
C. The nature and degree of impact upon neighboring lands: This property is surrounded by
other than single family residential zoning. It will be compatible with other non - single family
development occurring along this corridor.
If this rezoning were approved, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to
Commercial would be required.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of this rezoning.
Four (4) surrounding property owners were notified of this request. None (0) replied in favor and one (1) or
4.49% was opposed. These percentages were calculated by taking the actual square footage owned by
each property owner plus 50% of any right -of -way adjacent to their property divided by the total square
footage of land within 200 feet of the perimeter of this plat.
Mr. Harris made a motion to recommend approval of this rezoning request. Mr. Wright seconded the
motion.
Mr. John Denman, applicant, stated he was available for answering any questions the Commission may
have. Mr. Ray Clymer, applicant, stated this strip should have been rezoned prior to this time since the
adjacent property to the west is GC.
The recommendation for rezoning passed with a vote of nine (9) in favor and none (0) opposed
4. Carport
4115 Larchmont Place
Case C 99 -38
Twenty-four (24) surrounding property owners were notified of this request. Eight (8) or 33.34% replied in
favor and two (2) or 8.34% were opposed.
A motion was made and seconded to approve this carport request.
The applicant, Ms. Leah Clementson, stated she would conform with the application requirements. She
confirmed that the carport would not decrease the value of her home, and would be painted to match the
house.
The carport passed with a vote of nine (9) in favor and none (0) opposed
5. Carport
1426 Deville
Case C 99 -39
Nineteen (19) surrounding property owners were notified of this carport request. Five (5) or 21.05% replied
in favor and none (0) were opposed.
A motion was made and seconded to approve this carport request.
Ms. Ruby Ditto, applicant, was present.
The carport passed with a vote of nine (9) in favor and none (0) opposed.
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 7
6. Carport
1918 Margaret Drive
Case C 99-40
Twenty (20) surrounding property owners were notified of this request. Seven (7) replied in favor and none
(0) were opposed.
Mr. Berg made a motion to approve this carport request. Mr. Wright seconded the motion.
The applicant was present.
The carport was approved with a vote of nine (9) in favor and none (0) opposed.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Zoning Text Amendment
General Commercial Permitted and Conditional Uses
The following chart showing the proposed changes to the General Commercial district was presented to the
Commission. Those uses underlined were moved from the permitted use category.
Alcoholic Beverage Sales
Community Residential Center
Flea Market
Light Manufacturing
Halfway House
Contractors Yard
Kennel
Radio and TV Transmitting Tower
Manufactured Homes
Outdoor Entertainment and Recreation
Outdoor Storage
Warehousing Facility
Bus Station
Automotive Repair Service
Parking Facility
Mr. Wachsman expressed opposition based on the length of time required to process the conditional use
procedure. Mr. Berg countered his opposition by stating this process is not meant to impede or to penalize
new or relocating businesses.
Ms. Purtle made a motion to recommend the above changes to the General Commercial zoning district to
City Council. Mr. Berg seconded the motion. The motion passed with a voteof eight (8) in favor and one
(1) opposed.
2. City Council Update
Rezone SF to GC(c) — 5715 Seymour Highway
Rezone SF to GC — portion of Lynwood East Park
Mr. Clark stated the above rezoning cases were approved by City Council.
Recommendation to City Council to Revise the Carport Ordinance
Mr. Clark stated that this proposal was not presented to City Council.
3. Discussion of Items of Concern to Members of the P&Z Commission
Mr. Seese stated there is a workshop scheduled for Monday, November 15, 1999 to discuss the proposed
changes to the manufactured home ordinance.
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 8
VII. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 2:37 p.m.
David Rhone, Chairman Date
ATTEST:
Planning Administrator
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 10, 1999
Page 9
.!- 7 9' r
Date'