4A Wichita Falls Economic Development Minutes - 01/25/2008MINUTES OF THE
WICHITA FALLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
January 25, 2008
PRESENT:
Gary Shores, Chairman
§
Bo Stahler, Vice - Chairman/
§
Secretary/Treasurer
§
Dick Bundy
§
Members
Dave Lilley
§
Gary McLendon
§
Matt Benoit, Assistant City Manager
§
Linda Merrill, Recording Secretary
§
City Staff
Tim Chase, President
§
Kevin Pearson, VP, Economic Dev.
§
Warren Ayres, Board of Directors
§
BCI
Gordon Drake
§
Oncor Electric Delivery
Neal Blanton
§
Brenda Kays
§
Vernon College
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 4:01 p.m.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — NOVEMBER 2, 2007
Linda Merrill noted that she had referenced James Lane (rather than Leo Lane)
on page 4, but had corrected the minutes presented for signature today. There being no
further corrections, Dick Bundy moved, seconded by Gary McLendon, that the minutes
be approved. The motion unanimously carried.
III. DISCUSSION OF ITEM - CARTER COPTER
Tim Chase noted that the 4A Board granted Carter Copter up to $10,000 to hire
a consultant to decide if their patents were worth taking to market. They have had
reasonable success and great interest in the technology. They are in the process of
applying for a $3 Million grant from the Governor's Emerging Technology Fund. That
process has hit a snag, and their presentation will be postponed. In the meantime, they
will work on aspects of their business plan to make a better case.
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 2
IV. DISCUSSION ITEM — VERNON COLLEGE
Kevin Pearson prefaced Brenda Kays' presentation by reminding the Board that
it had approved an MOU on September 5, 2006, for the machinist training program at
the Vernon College Skills Training Center. That MOU specifies that $4,850 would be
allocated to the program in year two, and $69,745 would be allocated in year three.
However, due to the growth and success of the program, the College is requesting that
the allocations of years two and three be switched.
Brenda Kays expressed her pleasure to meet with the Board again, especially
since she can show success in the program. When she first appeared before the Board,
the College had a part-time instructor in the machining program, and only four students.
Forty-five students are enrolled for the spring semester. She is here to request a switch
in the allocations between years two and three, because the technology is needed now
in the program. They are looking for a combination mill /lathe machine made by Hawn.
Mr. Pearson added that it is a CMC 3 axis, state -of- the -art machine.
Dick Bundy asked if Vernon College would also flip its allocations for years two
and three, and contribute $10,000 at this time. Ms. Kays replied that could be done, and
the College will no doubt spend more than that to replace some of its current
equipment. They also anticipate expanding the classroom and lab in order to
accommodate the new equipment. Chairman Shores asked if the cost for the machine
will include programming, to which Ms. Kays replied affirmatively.
Vice - Chairman Stahler moved to approve the switch of the allocations for years
two and three under the MOU with Vernon College, so that $69,745 is granted in year
two, and $4,850 is granted in year three. Seconded by Mr. Bundy, the motion
unanimously carried.
Chairman Shores asked the length of the program. Ms. Kays replied the
advanced certificate takes 12 to 18 months, depending upon how much time a student
can commit to each semester. Most of the students attend on a part -time basis. A
number of students enroll in the early start college program offered to high school
juniors and seniors. When they graduate from high school, they also receive a basic
certificate in machining. Chairman Shores asked if most of them continue on to obtain
the advanced certification. Ms. Kays replied that the College does stress continuing
education, but it depends upon how fast these students are snatched up into the
marketplace. Vernon College would like to expand the certificate into an Associate's
Degree in the future.
Tim Chase noted that part of the program calls for the instructor to recruit, teach
and place, and questioned whether he has had success in placing everyone, and
whether he will be able to place the 45 students currently enrolled. Ms. Kays replied
there has thus far been only one graduate. She is confident the College will be able to
meet today's needs with the current enrollment, and also expects expansion of existing
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 3
companies,
as
well as the need to
fill jobs due to attrition. She hopes that more
companies
will
come into town due
to the fact the City will have this well- trained
workforce.
Mr.
Chase offered BCI's
assistance if the instructor needs help making
contacts.
Mr. Pearson noted that the TV ads that were initially shown have stopped. They
were well done, he added, and asked if they would continue. Ms. Kays noted they are
run in conjunction with registration. She thanked the Board for their continued
assistance with the program. Mr. Pearson noted it is a success story for 4A and Vernon
College.
V. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON EXTENSION OF UTILITIES FOR
THE WICHITA FALLS BUSINESS PARK
Mr. Pearson noted that the need to get utilities to Old Dominion had precipitated
this discussion. It is necessary to (1) address that issue, and (2) decide the most
effective way to bring utilities to the entire Park.
It is contemplated that overhead lines, rather than underground facilities, will
extend electricity to Old Dominion, at a cost of around $26,000. This will also provide a
partial backbone to serve the tenants in the most probable places in the Park.
Mr. Bundy asked if the overhead lines would be permanent. Gordon Drake of
Oncor replied that they would. This cost scenario was prepared at BCI's request. No
utilities exist within the Business Park proper at this time. If the BCI or a prospective
client requests underground lines, that cost will be figured at that time. It would depend
on several factors, such as how much land is involved, and how the tract was platted.
Mr. Bundy asked how much it would cost to come in underground. Mr. Drake
replied that the cost would be probably four times the cost of overhead lines. Providing
electricity via underground service requires a lot of expensive equipment. At this point,
the Board does not know what type of clients may locate in the Park. Old Dominion will
have a small electric load, but a client such as Delphi or Cryovac would not. Neal
Blanton agreed, stating that the Board would lose its flexibility if it opts to go with
underground installation. Once the underground installation has been completed, and
the lots are platted, it may very well be necessary to alter the facilities. Mr. Drake added
that a client could spend almost as much rebuilding its service as it cost to initially install
the electricity.
Mr. Bundy asked if the lines will be underground along Midwestern Parkway.
Mr. Drake noted that, due to the nature of those tracts, the buildings will be centered on
their property, surrounded by parking lots or paved areas. The lines will serve
everything from the rear. There will not be a pole line running east to west along
Midwestern Parkway.
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 4
Mr. Chase noted there is a rise of land in the park, and added that by the time
buildings are constructed, the lines will not be that obvious. Mr. Bundy expressed the
desire to keep the sight lines fairly clean, but he understands this is merely the
backbone for the Park. Gary McLendon asked if the poles will be wooden or metal.
Mr. Drake replied they will be standard wooden poles.
Mr. Chase asked for confirmation that the sum of $26,521.52 is the exact amount
to do what has been explained. Mr. Drake confirmed this figure, adding that this sum
covers approximately 1,700 feet of line.
Chairman Shores asked if anyone who locates on the south side of the Park will
be served from this point on the north. Mr. Drake replied that, more than likely, that will
be the only piece of distribution that will extend into the Park. The only other distribution
near the Business Park in that general area is the line that runs up and down Hammon
Ranch Road. That plan could change, however, depending upon what users move into
the Park. If a million square foot plant locates there, they'll reinvent the entire wheel. If it
stays at a three megawatt -type customer, this will be sufficient. It is not always business
size, however, but rather the type of business, that dictates.
Chairman Shores asked if the overhead lines will require easements. Mr. Drake
replied that as the properties are platted, utility easements will be required on the
perimeters, at the very least. The company might also execute written easements
directly with consumers. The plat on which Old Dominion will be located has been filed,
and there is an easement running along the north and east/west line of that particular
lot. The adjacent lots east and west are still unplatted, but there is an easement along
the north side of the Business Park property that is already platted. There is also a
platted easement that runs where the City paid to bury the line up near the flagpole that
exists to serve the City's lift station.
Mr. Chase noted that a budget amendment is needed for the $27,000 for
installation of electricity, and an amendment for the gas installation, as well. He asked
whether they should be combined in one amendment. Mr. Benoit replied either way
would be fine. Chairman Shores noted that gas and telecom services are still to be
discussed. He asked if Old Dominion will require gas service. Mr. Pearson stated the
company has not yet submitted an application to Atmos, but he believes they will need
gas service based upon preliminary conversations. Mr. Drake interjected that Old
Dominion had not yet contacted Oncor regarding its electrical needs, either. Mr. Bundy
stated that even if Old Dominion does not need gas, another company will, and
suggested they all be approved by one budget amendment. Mr. Chase noted there is an
issue which will delay the telecom discussion. He asked Mr. Pearson if representatives
from Atmos are going to attend today's meeting. Mr. Pearson noted they were
supposed to be here, and went out to see if they had arrived. In light of the telecom
postponement, Mr. Bundy observed that the Board ought to take action on the items
separately. Chairman Shores agreed.
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 5
Mr. Chase stated there is confusion as to whether the cost to run electricity to the
sewer lift station has been authorized. Mr. Benoit replied that there was no
understanding of electricity service when the $60,000 was approved, unless Jim Biggs
had included it. Mr. Chase thinks Mr. Biggs included the mechanical, but not the
electricity. However, there must be power to feed the lift station. The City has to request
its Retail Electric Provider to notify Oncor of its need for wires and poles. The Board
needs to decide if that should be an overhead or underground installation. There are
massive poles in the area, so it probably would not matter if there were a couple more.
Besides, if the electricity is installed underground, it would be probably have to be
rebuilt a second time for any future users of the property. Mr. Drake pointed out that if
those lines were buried, the cost to get service to any user who might buy a small tract
would be astronomical.
Mr. Benoit noted that there are no pumps in the lift stations now. But as users
dictate, the pumps may be upsized. He asked whether that would be problematic.
Mr. Drake replied probably not, but it would depend on the size of the pump. He is not
aware at this time what size pump is contemplated being installed. However, the City
does not typically triple the size of its pumps, although there might be a possibility that
the motor could be switched out.
Mr. Bundy commented that it would be fine with him if those lines are overhead.
Mr. Drake stated the people that would be hurt by underground installation would be the
user who buys the property between the lift station and the service road and
expressway. Once those lots get platted, every time one gets sold, he would have to cut
the cable and rewire it. It is all in a pipe. They do not splice the conductor; rather, the
wires have to be pulled in both directions every time it is cut. And every time that action
is performed, it will be charged to that customer.
Chairman Shores suggested the Board go forward with the electricity item, and
table the discussion on gas until representatives from Atmos can be present. Mr. Chase
asked Mr. Pearson if he could make the presentation to the Board concerning gas
service. Mr. Pearson noted the letter from Atmos explains that it would take 4,800 feet
to serve only Old Dominion, but approximately 8,100 feet to serve the entire Park.
Randy West and David Dunn, an engineer for Atmos, recommend that the gas
installation be done once, for the entire Park, because of the way the gas gets into the
Park. There will be two access points, and it is a looped system. Even for only Old
Dominion, it would be a looped system.
Mr. Chase added that the letter provides two options: (1) serve only Old
Dominion at a cost of $120,000 to $168,000, or (2) spend another $80,000 to $120,000
and loop all the way along Midwestern Parkway.
Mr. Bundy opined that the entire Park should be serviced. Vice - Chairman Stahler
asked why it is so much more expensive to provide the Park with gas versus electric
service. Even with everything going underground, Oncor's cost (at four times the cost
for overhead lines) is $100,000. Mr. Pearson replied that Atmos is burying 8" pipe as
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 6
opposed to providing overhead service. Vice - Chairman Stahler replied that the cost is
still significantly higher than the more expensive version of electricity installation.
Mr. Chase observed that the linear footage is three to four times more than is required
for electricity. Mr. Bundy reiterated that it makes sense to loop the entire Park, but feels
the Board needs to have someone explain this better before authorizing the
expenditure. Mr. Chase asked if the Board wished to meet again, or simply desired a
letter from Atmos that clarified the matter. He expressed his opinion that there is a
stronger selling point to loop the entire Park. Vice - Chairman Stahler countered that if
gas service is not needed at the present time, then a lot of money is being thrown at the
Park that is not necessary. Mr. Lilley noted that it will not get any cheaper to do, while
Mr. Bundy added that the Park will not be complete without gas service.
Vice - Chairman Stahler noted he is confused as to the $70,000 variance in cost
for option 1, and $40,000 for option 2. Mr. Bundy stated that Atmos is offering that they
perform the installation or put it out for bid. Mr. Pearson agreed that is a big reason for
the variance. Either Atmos could be the engineer, put the specs together, bid it out, and
put in the line. Or the 4A Board could be the general contractor, bid it out with the help
of Atmos, and have a certified contractor install it. The second option saves about 49%
of the cost. Either way, a lot of "fat" will be built into the contract because they will not
know where all of the irrigation lines are for landscaping. Mr. Chase added that if the
entire Park is not looped at one time, any time gas service was installed, it would disrupt
the landscaping. Mr. Bundy stated the company would not tie down its price until it is
designed. Mr. Chase noted the cost is $25 to $35 per foot. Multiply that out over 8,100
feet would lead to the price variance. The linear foot is the function of whether they hit a
stone as big as a car.
Chairman Shores asked why it would even be a consideration to have Atmos do
the work, if the Board could save 49% by acting as its own general contractor.
Mr. Pearson stated the only price in the letter is for the Board to act as the general
contractor. The question remains whether to serve the entire Park or only Old Dominion.
Chairman Shores expressed the desire to have representatives from Atmos at the
meeting.
Mr. Chase noted that if the Board desires to meet again, it should be done in the
next couple of weeks, and the telecom service could be discussed at that time, as well.
Warren Ayres noted that the overall cost to loop the entire Park will be
significantly less than just serving Old Dominion. His company does a lot of pipeline
work, and nearly every bid they get contains ranges similar to this. The company
doesn't know whether it will have to bore through rock. Their letter mentions the tariff it
will have to pay on taxes. If they design it and pay for it, they pay a tax on a tax, and will
require reimbursement for that, which will add 30% onto the cost.
Vice - Chairman Stahler moved, seconded by Mr. Bundy, for approval of a budget
amendment of $27,000 for the installation by Oncor of overhead electricity lines at the
Business Park. The motion unanimously carried.
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008
7
VI. DISCUSSION ITEM — ANNEXATION VS. NON - ANNEXATION OF THE
WICHITA FALLS BUSINESS PARK.
Mr. Chase noted that the issue of annexation versus non - annexation of the
Business Park has been debated at length. It is important to maintain as must flexibility
as possible to maintain the highest return on investment when the CFO of a company
calculates whether to locate here. The net present value of incentives is the determining
factor.
Non - annexation provides flexibility to negotiate the City's portion of property tax
up to 45 years, if the property remains outside the city limits. If the property is inside the
city limits, Texas law allows a maximum of 10 years for the city to discount a portion of a
company's property tax. On the surface, it seems like a no- brainer to continue with non -
annexation agreements.
There is still a question as to who owns and maintains the infrastructure moving
forward. It will fall to the Association to maintain if it is not annexed into the city limits
and dedicated to the City. Scott Taylor was going to see if the City paid for or had a role
to play in the sewer line going to the prison outside the city limits. There is a question as
to whether the roads, sewer and water could be dedicated to the City, but not the Park,
and whether the City can maintain that infrastructure outside the city limits. Mr. Bundy
believes that was done for the prison.
If the Park remains outside the city limits, fire protection would be provided by a
rural volunteer fire department, which operates at a different rating than does the City's
Fire Department. Fire ratings drive the premiums for insurance costs. Rural fire
department ratings result in significantly higher costs. Fire Chief Earl Foster is confident
the City will be at a Class 2 rating the next time it is reviewed. There are only five or six
Class 1 ratings in the state, so a Class 2 rating is outstanding.
Outside the city limits, the first responder for police protection is the sheriff. That
is fine unless there are serious crimes which require ongoing investigations. The
sheriffs office does not have the staff or resources of a police department.
Mr. Bundy asked if companies such as Cryovac and PPG have experienced any
problems with police and fire protection. Mr. Chase stated that they operate under a
non - annexation agreement which includes fire protection by the City. They are not
served by the police. That has only been an issue when there were occasions of some
union activity at PPG.
Mr. Chase asked one of the best industry consultants for his opinion, and was
told the net present value drives decision making, and not the term. He noted that it is
subjective how many years would be considered in the calculation, be it three, five or
ten. He opined probably not more than 10 years.
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 8
One option would be to annex the property and utilize the 10 -year abatement
policy. If more incentive is needed, then 4A funds could be used to level the playing field
against any competing community.
Mr. Bundy's gut reaction is to not annex the property right now. Mr. Benoit stated
that, from the time non - annexation legislation came about until now, the City's ability to
annex, forcefully or at the request of a company, has been diminished. The law requires
that the City have some contiguity to the piece of property to be annexed. The City
reserves the right at any time to annex the companies upon the termination of the non -
annexation agreements, but it does not have the necessary contiguity to annex them,
even if they asked for annexation.
Mr. Lilley asked if not making a decision is, in effect, making a decision?
Mr. Benoit replied negatively. Mr. Chase noted that a decision needs to be made so that
either (a) Old Dominion enters into a non - annexation agreement, or (b) it is annexed
into the city.
Mr. Benoit noted that several years ago, the City Council passed a resolution
prohibiting the City from serving property outside the city limits with utilities. At some
point, a user at the Park will need a water met set. The City cannot do this unless it is in
the city limits, or there is a non - annexation agreement for that property. It is
contemplated that only portions of the Park would be annexed, so that those parts
would have contiguity to just about every lot, so that annexation could occur at some
future date. In a perfect world, it would be best to handle each situation on a case -by-
case basis.
Mr. Chase stated there are still some unanswered questions: (1) whether the City
can maintain infrastructure outside the City limits; and (2) does the fact that Wichita
Clutch abuts the Park property at the northeast corner on two sides satisfy the contiguity
requirement, or does the City have to run some kind of strip down the center of the Park
to ensure its ability to do that. Paul Stillson of the Community Development Department
was going to research the laws regarding annexation to determine if that would be
sufficient contiguity.
Mr. Bundy asked the trend in other communities. Mr. Chase replied that he had
never heard of non - annexation agreements until he came here. The norm is that
companies are included in the city limits. Other states do not have the 10 -year cap on
the ability to abate as does Texas. For example, Oklahoma can abate county, city and
school district taxes.
Mr. Benoit asked if Mr. Chase's consultant friends did not shed much light on the
issue. Mr. Chase responded that the deciding factor is the net present value. Mr. Benoit
asked the net present value of how many years, as Mr. Chase himself had noted that
was subjective. If it is never more than ten years, the ten -year tax abatement should be
adequate.
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 9
Mr. Chase suggested that, instead of the current form of tax abatement
agreements, the City could give companies 100% abatement for 10 years, or at least for
the first four to five years. If the three -to -five year horizon is the decision - making period
for a company, then load all the dollars possible early in the project. Then, he added, if
more incentive is needed, and there are serious negotiations being conducted, 4A funds
could be used. Vice - Chairman Stahler noted the Council would have to approve that.
Chairman Shores observed that this decision will need to be made soon.
VII. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN AMENDMENT TO THE
WICHITA FALLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BYLAWS.
Mr. Benoit noted that an issue arose when the NEW deal was consummated at
MSU. Chairman Shores had to leave the meeting early, but the agreement needed to
be signed. There was a question as to whether Vice - Chairman Stahler had the authority
to sign the agreement in his stead.
At the November 2 meeting, the 4A Board elected Mr. Shores as President, and
Vice - Chairman Stahler as Vice President/Secretary/Treasurer. Vice - Chairman Stahler
pointed out the title is Vice Chairman.
Mr. Benoit stated the bylaws do not call for a vice president, but do allow for the
corporation to create any positions it desires. However, there must be a
secretary/treasurer. He drafted one sentence to amend the bylaws: "In the absence of
the present, the secretary/treasurer shall perform the powers and duties conferred upon
the president." This amendment has been approved by the City Attorney. Should
Mr. Shores be unable to sign, then Mr. Stahler would have that ability. Vice - Chairman
Stahler asked if this also protects the fact that he has signed documents in the past as
Vice Chairman, which was not authorized in the bylaws at that time. Mr. Benoit replied
that he does not think anything can be done retroactively to cure those actions.
However, nothing that he had signed as Vice Chairman is now in question.
Mr. Bundy moved, seconded by Mr. McLendon, for approval of the amendment
to the bylaws. The motion unanimously carried.
VIII. DISCUSSION ITEM — NEW CUSTOMER SERVICE
Kevin Pearson noted that NEW, (the work -at -home operation servicing DIRECTV
accounts) has now hired 125 people. They currently have 115 on the payroll, and 16 are
scheduled for training at MSU. The company plans to hire another 120 employees in
2008.
Mr. Chase stated that the second six -month agreement with MSU carries with it a
lease payment, so that will generate some income for the college. Chairman Shores
asked whatever happened on the money that was advanced to NEW to install the
infrastructure. Mr. Chase replied that, when the company comes to the 4A Board for
WFEDC — Minutes of January 25, 2008 10
reconciliation, the $10,000 will be deducted off of that. Chairman Shores asked if the
Company is aware of this. Mr. Chase replied that he has had conversations with
Rebecca regarding that, but he is unaware if she has told her supervisors.
Chairman Shores noted there was a misunderstanding regarding who was to pay
for the infrastructure, so the 4A Board paid to get the project underway. Mr. Chase
added that it was assumed that, since the building was new and wired, it would not
require extra infrastructure. However, a separate system needed to be installed that
paralleled MSU's system, as the IT folks could not build a strong enough firewall to
separate the two. Chairman Shores asked what will happen with the infrastructure once
the contract runs out. Mr. Chase replied that the system will stay in place. Some
switches may still have some life left in them. Mr. Bundy observed they would more than
likely be depleted by then.
IX. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 5:19 p.m.
lJ
ary SK6res, ihairman