The URL can be used to link to this page

AGD 06/06/2023 City of Wichita Falls City Council Agenda Stephen Santellana, Mayor akz8: , Bobby Whiteley, Mayor Pro Tem/At Large �/ ° .r, �,�� Michael Smith, District 1 • s� Larry Nelson, District 2 " " , °` ' ' Flf Jeff Browning, District 3 ` o' � n c� "tr '�w--P% �C {a �j�' Tim Brewer District 4 � (�j : M TEXAS "'`� o �r'' Steve Jackson, District 5 », � � Nue5 r olden 0 ortt ti P Darron Leiker, City Manager Kinley Hegglund, City Attorney Marie Balthrop, City Clerk Notice Of Regular Meeting Of The Mayor And City Council Of The City Of Wichita Falls, Texas, To Be Held In The City Council Chambers, Memorial Auditorium, 1300 Seventh Street, Tuesday, June 6, 2023, Beginning At 8:30 A.M. This meeting can be accessed and viewed at the following locations: 1. A livestream will be shown on the Spectrum/Time Warner Cable Channel 1300 2. A livestream will be shown on the City's Facebook page (City of Wichita Falls, Texas Government) (www.facebook.com/citvofwichitafalls) 3. A video of the meeting will be posted on the City's YouTube page (https://www.voutube.com/citvofwichitafalls) Item # 1. Call to Order 2. (a) Invocation: Ch (Col) Rolf Holmquist, Wing Chaplain, Sheppard AFB, U.S. Air Force (b) Pledge of Allegiance PRESENTATION OF COLORS AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Rio del Fierro Composite Squadron, Civil Air Patrol, U.S. Air Force Auxiliary 3. Presentations (a) Employee of the Month — John Hawksley, IT/Facilities (b) Proclamation — Man Up & Mentor Month, Big Brothers Big Sisters CONSENT AGENDA 4. Approval of minutes of the May 16, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council. 5. Receive Minutes (a) WFMPO Technical Advisory Committee, January 13, 2023 (b) Wichita Falls Park Board, February 23, 2023 (c) Civil Service Commission, March 9, 2023 (d) Wichita Falls-Wichita County Public Health Board, March 10, 2023 (e) Wichita Falls Park Board, March 23, 2023 (f) Landmark Commission, April 25, 2023 REGULAR AGENDA 6. Ordinances (a) Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the HIV Prevention Grant Program in the amount of $138,272 received from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same (b) Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Grant Program in the amount of$190,383.17 received from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC), and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same (c) Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the Texas Epidemiology Capacity Expansion Grant Program in the amount of $166,936 received from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same (d) Ordinance amending Chapter 102 of the Code of Ordinances by creating Article IX — Golf Cart, providing for severability, and setting an effective date (e) Ordinance canceling the regularly scheduled Council meeting on July 4, 2023 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 2 OF 5 7. Public Hearing & Resolutions (a) Resolution authorizing the removal and replacement of one (1) 17.5 ton and one 20 ton rooftop unit located on the MPEC's Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall in the amount of $53,544 (b) Resolution authorizing the award of bid for the City's estimated annual requirement of Curb & Gutter ready mix and Class A to Diamond M Concrete in the amount of $101 ,000.00; Class S and Flowable Fill to Blue Quill Trucking, LLC dba Falls Redimix, LLC in the amount of $423,850.00; and Class C-C ready mix to OK Concrete Company in the amount of $64,500.00 (c) Conduct a public hearing to receive citizen comments and take action on a resolution for the proposed 2023 Fourth Year Annual Action Plan of the adopted Five Year 2020-2024 Public Housing Agency (PHA) Plan i. Public Hearing ii. Take Action (d) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the New Restroom and Cart Barn Canopy/Pavilion addition at Champions Course at Weeks Park to Cage Construction and Management Co. dba Gary Baker Construction, in the amount of $412,792.00 (e) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to submit payment to ServiceMaster of Wichita Falls for water removal and dehumidification of the Wichita Falls — Wichita County Public Health District in the amount of $390,749 (f) Resolution approving the programs and expenditures of the Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation (WFEDC/4A) by amending the budget to include an up to $76,000 expenditure to the City of Wichita Falls to be used as 10% matching funds to update the Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan 8. Other Council Matters Announcements concerning items of community interest from members of the City Council. No action will be taken or discussed. 9. Comments from the public to members of the city council concerning items that are not on the city council agenda. People wishing to address the council should sign up prior to the start of the meeting. A three-minute time frame will be adhered to for those addressing their concerns. Since comments from citizens are not posted agenda items, the City Council is prohibited from deliberating or taking any action, other than a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. Staff may provide factual statements in response to inquiries or recite existing policy. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 3 OF 5 10.Executive Sessions (a) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code §551 .072, to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property if deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the governmental body in negotiations with a third person. (b) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code §551 .071 , consultation with attorney on matter involving pending or contemplated litigation or other matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with the Texas Open Meetings Act (including, but not limited to, legal issues related to a contract negotiation). (c) Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code §551 .087, to discuss or deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive, including modification to an existing agreement, for a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have, locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City of Wichita Falls and with which the City and/or economic development corporations created by the City are conducting economic development negotiations (including, but not limited to, the WFEDC Airport Master Plan Project). 11 .Adjourn Spanish language interpreters, deaf interpreters, Braille copies or any other special needs will be provided to any person requesting a special service with at least 24 hours' notice. Please call the City Clerk's Office at 761-7409. Every item on this agenda shall be considered a public hearing. Regardless of the agenda heading under which any item is listed, any word or phrase of any item listed on this agenda shall be considered a subject for consideration for purposes of the Texas Open Meetings Act and other relevant law, and City Council may deliberate and vote upon any such subject and resolutions related thereto. Resolutions, ordinances, and other actions concerning any word, phrase, or other subject may be voted upon, regardless of any language of limitation found in this agenda or any document referring to such action. Any penal ordinance, development regulation or charter provision of the City of Wichita Falls or item which is funded by the current or next proposed City of Wichita Falls budget, including, without limitation, any street, water pipe, sewer, drainage structure, department, employee, contract or real property interest of the City of Wichita Falls, may be discussed and deliberated, and the subject is hereby defined as such without further notice. Any item on this agenda may be discussed in executive session if authorized by Texas law regardless of whether any item is listed under "Executive Sessions" of this agenda, regardless of any past or current practice of the City Council. Executive sessions described generally hereunder may include consideration of any item otherwise listed on the agenda plus any subject specified in the executive session notice. Executive sessions described generally hereunder are closed meetings, may include consideration of any item otherwise listed on the agenda plus any subject specified in the executive session notice, and may include items under Texas Government Code Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076, 551.084, and/or 551.087. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 4 OF 5 CERTIFICATION I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at Memorial Auditorium, Wichita Falls, Texas on the 31st day of May, 2023 at 3:45 o'clock p.m. City Clerk 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 5 OF 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Employee of the Month. INITIATING DEPT: Human Resources NAME: John Hawksley DEPARTMENT: Building Maintenance HIRE DATE: 6/23/2021 PRESENT POSITION: Facilities Manager COMMENTARY: Presentation of the Employee of the Month Award (plaque, letter of appreciation, gift card, dinner for two, and a check for $100). ® Director of Human Resources ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.A City of Wichita Falls City Council Meeting ..,.�. Minutes \--U4ik, May 16, 2023 ,, a�«� T E X AS IF. ' 7, $/uej es 4e/der'Oppartury7ies Item 1 - Call to Order The City Council of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, met in regular session at 8:30 a.m. on the above date in the Council Chambers at Memorial Auditorium with the following members present. Stephen Santellana - Mayor Bobby Whiteley - Mayor Pro Tem/At-Large Tim Brewer - Councilors Jeff Browning - Steve Jackson - Larry Nelson - Michael Smith - Darron Leiker - City Manager Kinley Hegglund - City Attorney Marie Balthrop - City Clerk Mayor Santellana called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. Item 2a — Invocation Pastor Ben Murray, City Hope Church, gave the invocation. Item 2b — Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Santellana led the Pledge of Allegiance. Item 3a — Proclamation — Foster Care Month, 2INGage PAGE 1 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. 8:32 a.m. Mayor Santellana read a proclamation proclaiming the month of May as Foster Care Month in Wichita Falls and urged all citizens to recognize this observance. Item 3b- Presentation of Water Conservation Week, Public Works 8:35 a.m. Mayor Santellana read a proclamation proclaiming May 15-21, 2023, as Water Conservation Week and called upon each citizen and business to help protect our precious resources by practicing water saving measures and become more aware of the need to save water. Item 3c-Wichita Falls Citizen's Academy Graduation 8:37 a.m. Mayor Santellana discussed how the Citizen's Academy builds ambassadors for the City, and he presented a Key to the City to each graduate. Item 4-6 — Consent Items 8:44 a.m. Darron Leiker, City Manager, gave a briefing on the items listed under the Consent Agenda. Moved by Councilor Browning to approve the consent agenda. Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Item 4—Approval of Minutes of the May 02, 2023, Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council Item 5 — Resolution 50-2023 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 Page 2 PAGE 2 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the Health Department Reception Renovation Project to AOC Environmental, Inc., in the amount of $127.600.00 Item 6 — Receive Minutes (a) Lake Wichita Revitalization Committee, April 11, 2023 (b) Planning and Zoning Commission, April 12, 2023 Item 7a — Ordinance 23-2023 8:45 a.m. Ordinance appropriating a total of$2,000,000 of American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Funding for reconstruction of street/sidewalk lighting in Downtown Wichita Falls. Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Ordinance 23-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Browning and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Mayor Santellana moved to item 8b Item 8b — Resolution 52-2023 8:51 a.m. Resolution authorizing the purchase of a Chevrolet Service Truck for the Fleet Maintenance Division through the Sourcewell Purchasing Cooperative from Viking-Cives Midwest, Inc. in the amount of $189,461.29 Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 52-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 Page 3 PAGE 3 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Mayor Santellana returned to item 7b Item 7b — Ordinance 24-2023 8:51 a.m. Ordinance appropriating a total of $90,790.00 of American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Contingency Funding to the City's General Fund for the additional costs for the renovation of two restrooms located at the Health District Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Ordinance 24-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Item 8a — Resolution 51-2023 8:57 a.m. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the Health Department Restroom Renovation Project to AOC Environmental, Inc., in the amount of $185,190.00. Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Resolution 51-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Jackson and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 Page 4 PAGE 4 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. Item 8c — Resolution 53-2023 9:01 a.m. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement for Engineering Services for the Quail Creek Drainage Improvements Phase I in the amount of $67,788.81 . Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Resolution 53-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Browning and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Item 8d — Resolution 54-2023 9:04 a.m. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the 2023 Concrete Street Rehabilitation Project to Freeman Paving, LLC in the amount of $1,848,299.00. Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 54-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Item 8e — Resolution 55-2023 9:06 a.m. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for the Department of Justice, FY 2023 Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant in the amount up to $13,700.00. Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Resolution 55-2023. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 Page 5 PAGE 5 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. Motion seconded by Councilor Nelson and carried by the following vote. Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Item 8f— Resolution 56-2023 9:07 a.m. Resolution approving an agreement under the Meet and Confer process to allow for the creation and maintenance of eligibility lists for lateral positions in the Police Department and to waive the age requirements for the lateral position. Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 56-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Nelson and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Item 8q — Resolution 57-2023 9:14 a.m. Discussion and possible action on a resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve a request from the Museum of North Texas History to donate by Gift Agreement, artifacts from the holdings of the abandoned Railroad Museum. Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 57-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Smith. Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager, reminded the Council that this item only pertains to the small artifacts from the abandoned Railroad Museum and does not include any railcars. Approval of this Resolution would remove the artifacts from the elements and put them on public display at the Museum of North Texas History. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 Page 6 PAGE 6 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. Councilor Brewer asked what would happen to the items if the Council votes no on this item and it was stated the items would remain where they are. There was brief discussion regarding the need to protect the items from the elements. Councilor Jackson stated that he hopes after the discussion the Council votes to allow the items to stay with the Railroad Museum. Councilor Smith stated that the Museum of North Texas History has devoted many hours to inventory these items, and the Board, which he is a member of, desires to preserve these small items to be presented for public display. He stated he hopes for a vote to proceed with this item. Alyssa Johnston, 2307 Speedway Ave., newly elected Railroad Museum Board President, addressed the Council and expressed the groups desire to revitalize the Railroad Museum, to form a non-profit, and to preserve the artifacts. She stated she understands the agenda item, that they do not want to ruffle feathers, and they want the items to be well preserved and available for public viewing. The Board requests time to formally form a non-profit to move forward with revitalizing the Railroad Museum, and to partner with the Museum of North Texas History to ensure proper preservation and public viewing. The Board proposes that they be allowed to lease the Railroad Museum location for 7 months, with a soft opening planned for July 4, 2023, and full opening planned by mid-August. Their short-term goals are to ensure safety and structural integrity of the existing rolling stock, to open within 4-6 months, to rehabilitate and revitalize the museum, to use volunteers to cleanup and maintain the grounds, to ensure security and safety of the cars, to fundraise and begin grant application process, and to promote and market through their identified strategy plan. They have prepared a business plan, but the plan depends on working with the City to move forward, and they want to open as soon as safely possible. Skip Waters, 3419 Westminster Ave., Dallas, TX, addressed the Council on behalf of the National Railway Historical Society as current President of the North Texas Chapter. He is also the Chapter Development Chairman for the National Railroad Historical Society. He was contacted about creating a new local chapter and this item is on the state agenda for vote on May 21, 2023. They have resources to assist the local organization to bring the museum back to life. He discussed the great attendance of the planning meetings, several individuals independently working on this project, and how everyone has come together to form a board and elect officers. Rail enthusiasts still come to Wichita Falls to see the equipment and want to see the museum. He requested that the Council consider giving the group the opportunity to revitalize the museum, and he feels partnering with another organization is beneficial, and sees that as a positive. Jan Saville, 2017 Berkeley Drive, owner of the World's Littlest Skyscraper, addressed the Council and presented several full guestbooks with names of individuals that have visited her building. She is located very close to the Railroad Museum and many visitors are disappointed when they hear the museum is closed. She asked the Council to envision CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 PAGE 7 OF 12 PAGE 7 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. what a valuable addition this museum can be to the City. She discussed attractions in other towns such as the Stockyards in Fort Worth with the daily gunfight attraction, and suggested that similar things can be done in Wichita Falls at the Railroad Museum, such as a stagecoach and train robbery reenactment, or reenactment of an oil field gusher. She discussed having the museum open in time for the ribbon cutting of the new hotel and convention center, as this is a chance to increase tourism with family friendly entertainment downtown. They are seeking recognition of the organization, renewal of the lease, and preservation of the artifacts. Ann Arnold, Executive Director of the Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture, 1005 9th Street, stated that they are excited about the groups that have spoken and they look forward to working with them. The Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture is the local arts agency that serves and partners with the City. She stated that preservation of our history and heritage is vital and they are thrilled to support this group and share their expertise and resources. Museums preserve history and make sure items are properly cared for and the Museum of North Texas History has the training to preserve and care for these items. She recommended the items be placed with the museum while this group moves forward. Jerry Weems, 2630 Northshore Dr., addressed the Council and stated he was disappointed that the museum was closed when he went to visit. He hopes the City keeps the artifacts and allows the group to move forward. Mayor Santellana stated that he feels like everyone is in agreement with wanting to preserve the artifacts and to support the newly formed group as much as possible. John Christhoff, 1013 Turtle Creek Road, discussed the history of the Railroad Museum and how citizens of Wichita Falls raised money to move the 304 railcar to its current location. He discussed the enthusiasm of the community and the business plan to move forward, and asked the City consider leasing the current museum location to the newly formed board. He stated the heritage and the preservation of the heritage of Wichita Falls is important, and discussed education programs previously provided. Annie Jackson, 1027 Crescent Lane, addressed the Mayor regarding a conversation they had regarding the contentious hotel and convention center project, and the database used to see what other cities offer. She discussed her experience with other corporations and teambuilding efforts between human resources departments for teambuilding. She asked the Council to consider how the Railroad Museum could be used for teambuilding events, and discussed the importance of preserving our history. She discussed various items at the Railroad Museum that are important to our heritage, and possible school trips that could be restarted. She asked that the Council promote and support a working venture between the two Museums to promote our City, tourism, and heritage. Ms. Johnston asked what the next steps are to move forward. Mr. Leiker stated that the original proposal was to turn over the artifacts, and sell a portion of the existing rail stock CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 PAGE 8 OF 12 PAGE 8 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. for funding for renovation. Mr. Leiker suggested that the Council stand down on selling any of the railcar stock, allow the group to continue to move forward, and allow the Museum of North Texas History to preserve the artifacts in the interim. Discussion was held regarding the steps needed to move forward. Steve Goen, 1519 Sweetbriar Dr., addressed the Council and discussed the history of the museum, memories he has of the railroad, and memorabilia he owns. He stated he is considered the leading railroad historian in the United States, and he has written twelve books which are available in our public library. He discussed his involvement in previous efforts to save railcars, the history of the museum, the artifacts he has purchased with his own funds, and previous efforts to add to the museum. He is not concerned about the artifacts going to the Museum of North Texas History since he has a larger personal collection, but he is concerned about the grounds and the railcars. Becky Trammel, 307 Morning Drive #11, Burkburnett, and Nadine McKown, Executive Director of the Museum of North Texas History, 720 Indiana, addressed the Council. Ms. Trammel clarified that the Museum of North Texas History will not obtain or sell the rolling stock, and she suggested that the Council table this item as they cannot be a storage facility for a potential future museum. Mr. Hegglund stated the item has been tabled before and needs to be voted on today. Ms. Trammel stated they will take the items under the terms in the agreement, and agrees to partner with the new group like they do with other groups once they become a lawful 501(c)3, have secure facilities, and become a member of the community. Councilor Smith called for a vote. Motion seconded by Councilor Brewer and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: Councilor Jackson The main motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Browning, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: Councilors Brewer, Jackson, and Nelson. There was brief discussion about a possible conflict of interest with Councilor Smith serving on the board of the Museum of North Texas History, and Mr. Hegglund stated there is no legal conflict, and every Councilor is required to vote. Item 8h — Resolution 58-2023 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 PAGE 9 OF 12 PAGE 9 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. 10:14 a.m. Resolution confirming the appointment of a Fire Chief for the City of Wichita Falls. Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 58-2023. Motion seconded by Councilor Smith. Mr. Leiker discussed the requirements for Fire Chief, the application review, and the interview process. He recommended that Deputy Chief Donald Hughes be appointed as Fire Chief, and discussed his service and qualifications. Moved by Councilor Brewer to amend the main motion to add Donald Hughes in the blank on the Resolution. Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None The main motion as amended carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Jackson, Nelson, Smith, and Whiteley Nays: None Item 9a — Presentation on the City's new public-facing GIS interactive map — Terry Floyd 10:19 a.m. Terry Floyd, Director of Development Services, gave a presentation on the new public facing GIS interactive map and provided a live demonstration. The map can be accessed from the City's Development Services homepage on the website, and individuals can check their zoning and other property information. He discussed plans for additional public facing information that will be added in the future. Item 9b —Announcements concerning items of community interest from members of the City Council. No action will be taken or discussed. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 PAGE 10 OF 12 PAGE 10of12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. 10:23 a.m. Councilor Whiteley stated he was confused about the response from the Railroad Museum supporters after the vote since what he heard is that both sides agreed to preserve the small artifacts until the new group is up and running. He discussed the need for communication to avoid misconceptions, and he thanked Councilor Jackson for bringing up the Railroad Museum and moving that forward. He congratulated the Police Department for their efforts to get officers hired and discussed the need to increase pay for police and fire in order to compete with other agencies, and this will be discussed more during the upcoming budget meetings. He congratulated Chief Hughes on his appointment as Fire Chief. Councilor Browning congratulated Chief Hughes for his appointment as Fire Chief and thanked Terry Floyd for his concise and informative presentation. Councilor Smith congratulated Chief Hughes, and he thanked everyone for attending today. Councilor Brewer discussed the Fire Fighter's Association Banquet and the Police Officer's Memorial service which were both great events. He also congratulated Councilor Jackson for getting things moving forward with the Railroad Museum. Councilor Jackson congratulated Chief Hughes and thanked Chief Borrego for his efforts to continue to hire more officers, and obtain additional bulletproof vests. He recommended that the City move forward with a yearly lease agreement with the Railroad Museum board for $1.00 per year. This will be a great addition to downtown and there has been a tremendous outpour of interest. Mayor Santellana congratulated Chief Hughes for his appointment. He enjoys seeing individuals that are interested in running for office attending meetings, and he encouraged anyone interested to reach out with any questions they have. He congratulated the Citizens Academy graduates and discussed the benefits of the program which makes ambassadors for the City. He thanked other Council members for stepping up to attend events he is unable to attend due to the high number of events he has been invited to. He recognized the emotions regarding the Railroad Museum item but it looks like we are moving in the right direction moving while the current items are being preserved. He feels like there is some confusion about the action taken today and he will reach out to members of the group to discuss the action taken. Councilor Jackson asked about an estimated date when the convention center will open, and it was stated it would open around end of July or August. He said he feels the Railroad Museum will be a great attraction for visitors, and suggested eventually getting a trolley. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 PAGE 11 OF 12 PAGE 11 of 12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. Mayor Santellana gave a shout out to our City Manager intern Henry Anderson who is interested in local government and will be attending a graduate program at Texas A&M next semester. Item 10 — Comments from the Public to Members of the City Council Concerning Items That Are Not on the City Council Agenda 10:37 a.m. There were no comments from citizens. Item 11 — Executive Sessions City Council adjourned into Executive Session at 10:37 a.m. in accordance with Texas Government Code §551.087, and §551.072. City Council reconvened at 11:06 a.m. Mayor Santellana reconvened in open session and announced that no votes or polls were taken. Item 12 —Adjourn Mayor Santellana adjourned the meeting at 11:07 am. PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of June 2023. Stephen Santellana, Mayor ATTEST: Marie Balthrop, TRMC, MMC City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16, 2023 PAGE 12 OF 12 PAGE 12of12 AGENDA ITEM NO.4. WICHITA FALLS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Technical Advisory Committee Minutes Friday,January 13, 2023 Voting Members Present: Lin Barnett,Wichita Falls MPO, MPO Director, TAC Chairperson Blane Boswell,City of Wichita Falls, City Engineer Callan Coltharp,TxDOT,Area Engineer David Rohmer,TxDOT,Director of Operations Larry Wilkinson,City of Wichita Falls,Traffic Superintendent Karen Montgomery-Gagne, City of Wichita Falls, Planning Administrator Monty Brown,TxDOT, Director of Construction Shaun Barnes,TxDOT, Proxy for Scot Reaves,Director of TP&D Terry Floyd,Director of Development Services MPO Staff Jaimie Lee,Wichita Falls MPO,Senior Transportation Planner I. Welcome&Introduction Mr. Barnett, TAC chairperson, called the meeting to order at 9:32 a.m. and welcomed everyone in attendance. II. Public Comment on Agenda and Non-Agenda Items Mr. Barnett asked for any public comments on agenda and non-agenda items. Receiving none,the committee moved on to the next agenda item. III. Review and Approval of the October 6,2022 Technical Advisory Committee's(TAC) Meeting Minutes Mr. Barnett asked for any comments or corrections to the October 6, 2022 TAC meeting minutes.Receiving none,he asked for a motion to approve the minutes. Mr.Rohmer made the motion to approve.Ms.Gagne seconded the motion,which passed unanimously. IV. Review and Comment Regarding the October 25, 2022 Transportation Policy Committee's (TPC's) Meeting Minutes-No Action Required Mr.Barnett asked for comments on the October 25,2022 TPC meeting minutes.Receiving none,the committee moved on to the next agenda item. V. Review and Recommendation to the Policy Board to Approve Resolutions #1, #2, #3,and#4 That Will Update the TxDOT Performance Measures Adopted by WFMPO Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting January 13, 2023 1 PAGE 1 of 3 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.a Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to Resolution #1-2023. He stated this resolution continues support for the performance measures and targets set in Resolution #1-2022 that were adopted by the Policy Board in January 2022. Mr. Barnett stated this resolution sets the Safety Performance(PM1) targets for 2023. Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to Resolution #2-2023. He stated this resolution continues support for the performance measures and targets set in Resolution #2-2022 that was adopted by the Policy Board in January 2022. Mr. Barnett stated this resolution sets the 2023 performance measures and targets for the Transit Asset Management/State of Good Repair plan for the Wichita Falls Transit System (WFTS). Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to Resolution #3-2023. He stated this resolution adopts TxDOT's performance measures and targets for Infrastructure Condition (PM2) from 2019-2023. Mr. Barnett stated PM2, Infrastructure Condition,sets measures and targets for Interstate, Non-Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) bridge pavements. He stated this measure rates pavements on good and poor condition. Mr. Barnett directed the committee's attention to Resolution #4-2023. He stated this resolution adopts TxDOT's performance measures and targets for System Performance/Freight (PM3) from 2019-2023. He stated PM3 System Performance/Freight, sets measures and targets for Person-Miles Travelled on Reliable Interstate & Non-Interstate facilities, and on the Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index. Mr. Barnett asked for any comments or questions regarding the resolutions. Receiving none,he asked for a motion to forward the resolutions to the Policy Board for their review and approval. Ms. Gagne made the motion to approve. Mr. Wilkinson seconded the motion,which passed unanimously. VI. Review and Recommendation to the Policy Board to Approve to Adopt the 2023 Prioritized Project List for WFMPO Use in 2023. Mr. Barnett briefly discussed the updates to the 2023 Prioritized Project List (PPL). He stated WFMPO staff has completed all of the TAC committee recommended changes, revisions, and updates to the 2023 Prioritized Project List. The TAC committee recommended removing one project from the PPL that is set to let. Mr. Barnett asked for any other comments or questions regarding the 2023 Prioritized Project List. Receiving none, he asked for a motion to forward the 2023 Prioritized Project List to the Policy Board for their review and adoption. Mr. Coltharp made the motion to approve. Mr. Wilkinson seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. VII. Other Business: a. Discussion&Overview of Progress on Local Transportation Projects- City and TxDOT staff(Quarterly Review) City: Mr. Boswell reported Taft Blvd. widening was 90% complete. 2022 Asphalt St. Rehab was 100% complete. The Business Park Streets and Drainage Project is 70% complete.2022 Concrete St.Rehab project was 10% complete. Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting January 13, 2023 2 I P a g e PAGE 2 of 3 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.a TxDOT:, Mr. Coltharp reported FM 369 bridge improvement along Southwest Parkway at Holliday Creek is nearing completion. Future projects include FM 369 districtwide seal coat, BU 287J widen roadway, FM 369 mill at gutters, and SH 79 install median barrier. b. MPO Quarterly Financial Report (4th Quarter FY 2022 - July, August, September) Mr.Barnett reported on the 4th quarter expenses for the MPO.He stated that the MPO had spent 90%of its total allocation for FY 2022.Mr.Barnett asked for any comments or questions on the fourth quarter financial report. He received none. c. Grouped TxDOT CSJ Projects Report Ms. Lee reported on the 4th quarter grouped CSJ projects report. Ms. Lee discussed the changes to the projects over the quarter. d. Other Items There were no other items for business VIII. Meeting Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:13 a.m. /rf Irvan F. "Lin :arnett Jr. MPO Transportation Planning Director Wichita Falls MPO Wichita Falls MPO TAC Meeting January 13, 2023 3 I P a g PAGE 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.a Wichita Falls Park Board Meeting February 23, 2023 W.F. Recreation Center 600 11 to Street Room 205 Time: 1:30pm Presiding: Jim Heiman Members Present: Alan Donaldson, Dorcas Chasteen, Sandy Fleming, Patrick Hearn, Jessica Traw, Thomas Taylor, Josh Phillips, Simeon Hendrix, Michael Battaglino Members Absent: Larri Jean Jacoby City Council Representative: Steve Jackson Other: Scott McGee, Scott Powell (filled in for Terry Points (Staff Liaison) Blake Jurecek 1 CALL TO ORDER: Jim Heiman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes from January 26, 2023 were put before the Board for approval. Josh Phillips made the motion to approve the minutes and Sandy Fleming seconded the motion. AMENDED MINUTES: February 23, 2023 a motion was made to add "The Board Approved 5 Goals/Objectives for the 2023-2024" (See Attached) Michael Battaglino approved the added amendment and Josh Phillips second the motion. 3. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT: A. Recreation: Scott McGee • See Attached Recreation Report B. Parks: Terry Points • See Attached Parks Report C. Lake Wichita Revitalization Committee: • Veterans memorial plaza, construction is underway • Memorial Day May 29 is tentatively the date for grand opening, hoping that Congressman Rodney Jackson will attend. PAGE 1 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.b D. Circle Trail Update: • See Attached E. Parks Review Update: • See Attached • Tom Taylor made the recommadation to approve the $4,800 street to pavillion sidewalk at Lions Park. Alan Donaldson seconded the motion. • The CWF Park Board priority list were put before the Board for approval. Tom Taylor made the motion to aprove and Michael Battaglino seconded the motion. F. Other Business, Announcements, Comments: • A vote for Chair Officiers were put before the Board for approval. Jim Heiman was voted to remain First Chair and Tom Taylor remain Second Chair. Alan Donaldson made the 1St motion to approve and Dorcas Chasteen second the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 2:46pft Signature: G• .1 (/'//:66117/-4111 Jim eiman (First Chair) PAGE 2 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b Recreation Report 02/23/2023 50 Plus Zone daily numbers for the week at 245. Annual Zone Valentines Dinner held 2/14 with 110 people attending. Recreation Classes at 40 for the month of February. Summer Camp Staff Jobs posted. Upcoming in March, Fishing Rodeo, March Movie Madness and Easter Egg Hunt. Canes Chicken has returned to be a sponsor at all of the Recreation Holiday events. Athletics Basketball league playoffs are this week. Registration for Spring Softball and Volleyball continue. Seasons begin week of 3/20. Turf project-nearing completion. First tournament on turf scheduled for March 25-26. There are 12 tournaments scheduled through the first week in July. • As of now, there are 6 tournaments in the works for the Fall season. Jobs posted for Lucy Pool Staff. Estimates are in on pool repairs and refurbish to meet current code requirements. That work will begin in April. Spring Tennis tournaments are underway. There are eight tournaments schedule through April. Cleanup of the Weeks Tennis Center has begun. Resurface to create eight pickleball courts at Weeks should be done by end of March depending on weather. Permanent post and nets will take longer but will have portable nets until then. There will be a meeting of pickleball players at the Weeks Center, March 1, 2023 at 5:30 pm. • PAGE 3 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b h Rotary Park small shelters to get underway next week. Rotary Club's funding this project. Rotary, another zip line is being looked at. Research on the Gravity Rail was disappointing. Hamilton Shelter and sidewalks construction will start soon. We are constructing a CDBG funded restroom for O'Reilly Park. Poligon Shelter is ordered for Scotland Berm. CDBG. Electrical Bids for Scotland North Shelter are coming in. Graffiti's getting bad. Wichita Bluffs, Edgemere, Sunset Terrace and Cityview have all been tagged. Crews have been sandblasting graffiti. Also, playgrounds and basketball courts for re- painting. I met with Lions Club President, Ryan Donaldson at the park to discuss future projects. Great visit. The large Pagoda in Lucy Park was burnt down early Monday morning. Sad Day!! i 1 IL 7ir „ ""vr N �,s PAGE 4 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b Questions from Jim • 1. Can we have a firm estimate of what the specs and costs would be to put in a sidewalk at Lions park from the curb to the pavilion? This is needed for the board to reach out to the Lions club and others for donations (materials, labor and money) to finalize this project. Tom feels that he may have some volunteer/donations available to get this project done. It would be a good first step for the board to show it can help get projects done. 2. As we were driving around Lucy Park recently my wife asked what plan we have to replace the beautiful large, old trees in the park. I said I know we used to have a 'tree farm' located at the park but I am no longer sure what the city's plans are. Could you update the board on a 10 -20 year plan for tree replacement. The past 10 years have shown what bad weather, droughts and ice, can do to our older trees. Also as we drove on the west side of the park, near the Camp Fire property, we noticed the 'garden beds' were not used very much this past year. What are those beds used for? • PAGE 5 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b 0 #1 LIONS PARK ri .4,4_4 .......: A ,..,.-• i RA' -/ r -- -, _-CN iN1 ......„. I i • 1 k [IV • ''''., „..„. , .. , *. 0 ,,, /4 a 41. :44 , R 3 , ,, A * , . / , ', ?, t 1 • °:, , , ,* I l,-; 1 L., st ft ;* A ' 0 1 7, „A 4,, ,. I 4,s/tY; it tj,, I I .k' Based on current 2023 bid prices, 5' sidewalks are running about $60 a linear foot.A loop sidewalk would be a nice addition to the park. I have divided it into different areas and shown current cost. A new small playground w/border and surfacing is about $60,000. • PAGE 6 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO.5 b #2 Trees and Beds IIII Let's address the "garden beds" near the Camp Fire property first. In the past we used those beds to trial various flowers. In recent years we have used them to plant any extra flowers that we have left after the 2 major color change plantings that we do in May and October. Each season we experience about a 10% loss of flowers due to theft. If we have the right flowers in the reserve beds, we can transplant them back and fill in the gaps left by the flower thieves. Regarding tree replacement. There could be a need to establish a new tree nursery to take care of replacement trees and to supply trees only to new project areas. It's really the only affordable way to do it, especially since the price of nursery trees has skyrocketed in the last few years. In 2022 we paid $150 each for some 1" caliper trees about 4 ft tall. Normally we would never try to plant a tree that was less than 2" in caliper. 2" inch trees are scarce in the nursery trade right now due to the great demand for replacement trees all across Texas. A 3" caliper tree could easily cost $500 or more. Plus there is not a very wide selection of tree species and varieties available. When we were heavily into growing our own trees and transplanting them • ourselves we calculated that it only cost us about $10 per tree from liner to planted 2" caliper tree. We planted over 14,000 trees out of our nurseries from 1995 to 2013. To purchase that many trees, even wholesale, would cost over 4 million dollars. IF WE WANTED TO START UP A NEW NURSERY Long term, we probably do need to start another tree nursery. They could have trees ready to transplant in 3 to 5 years. If the nursery produces more trees than are needed in any one year, the extras could be dug and auctioned off to local vendors. Money, Machines and Manpower New equipment would have to be purchased. A new skid loader runs about $65,000±, our old "Care Tree" spades are worn out and obsolete. We have gotten a price on a new "Optimal model 1100" tree spade. It would cost about $25,000 le PAGE 7 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b (plus freight). We estimate that we still have about 200 trees in the LucyLand tree 1111 nursery that could be transplanted with the Optimal spade. It will transplant up to a 5" caliper tree. That's about $60,000 worth of trees if we had to buy them. If we were to use the money we have budgeted for replacement trees this year to purchase the spade, we could transplant many of the nursery trees into Lucy Park and other areas as needed. If we use the $25,000 to purchase replacement trees, we could only get less than 100 trees. Keep in mind, a tree nursery is a lot like a garden. Weeds need to be removed, grass needs to be mowed and all those baby trees need lots of extra care the first couple of years until they get some growth. Harvest time requires skill to run machines and doing the ball and burlap process on the ground, loading and planting the trees properly. We would not try to replant any tree liners in the Lucy Land nursery because of the tremendous deer pressure there. The ideal spot would be in the area east of the Flyover between the Kell East and West "access roads". And only with TXDOT approval. There is already water in that area and the deer would not dare venture that far into town. Vandalism and theft would also be less. Tree liners can be bought for about $3.00 each. • • PAGE 8 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b VIETNAM/VETERANS MEMORIAL AT LAKE WICHITA PARK NI , , ,....,,,,,,,--, ',,,-.-4...4,,, , . ,,,_ . , ,.. .,,, .., , it .„,..„.._ ,., ,,..,,..,. , ,,,_.!„..., ,.. , , . , ...,,....,.., , , , .. s.. OA" 4( ' i .^.,„,' ' t, . - . ,, , y a^ y Lt ,, ,„:„,..„._,..,..,_, ,,,, .q . .7 .,.,.. . .",..:44;41' . fi . A�. 4 41 C "` Art rG 1 . l✓- I a • PAGE 9 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b INTERIM PARK SIGNAGE - PARK BOARD 2023 GOALS RECOMMENED WAY AHEAD — GOAL # 1 PARK BOARD, JANUARY 26, 2023 New Park signage was #1 priority for the park board. Park funding increased significantly in the FY 23 budget. $200K was allocated for a professional parks and recreation consultant. CFW Council is hesitant to fund large items (play sets) that may be obsolete, depending on the Parks & Rec Consultant Review recommendations. The Park Board recommends an evaluation of current Park signage and way finder signage listing Park info. The board also recommends,to the CWF Council, that some items such as broken and eroding park name signs be replaced in FY 23. These old signs send the message that the CWF does not care about parks. The Park signage requirement should run currently with the ADA Curb to Playset and metal play equipment refurbish projects. Below are supportive comments relative to the park board's prioritized sign replacement. 1. Sign replacement priority is based on sign condition, high traffic location, & neighborhood. Goal is to eventually replace all park signs with standard, inviting, functional & modern signage. 2. Most signs are made of wood & sited at park entrances- most are aged, many are broken. 3. Several have been replaced with new, smaller signs. The board does not consider these metal signs a permanent solution. 4. The long-term park signage replacement requirement is expensive and may have to wait. Way ahead: a. Relook way finder signs on Southwest Parkway (281 to Kell Blvd./82) b. Relook way finder signs on Martin Luther King Blvd. c. Relook way finder signage on Midwestern Parkway. d. Relook way finder signage in area of MLK Center (Smith St, Homes &Tulsa). e. Relook Jalonick Park- a sprawling park adjacent to Sunnyside Multipurpose Center. Continued on Next Page ******** PAGE 10 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b CWF PARK SIGNAGE - # 2 PARK BOARD PRIORITY - JAN 26, 2023 (PARK CATEGORY CODES: MINI = 1; NEIGHBORHOOD = 2; COMMUNITY=3; LARGE URBAN = 4) (REGIONAL= 5; MISC= 6; RECREATION &SPORTS = 7) PR MAJOR ROAD # PARK NAME & SIGN CONDITION WAY FINDER COMMENTS DISTRICT COMMENTS RECOMMENDATION 1 ROSELAWN (3) REPLACE NOW- HIGH NEED NEW W/F STYLE REPLACE WITH METAL TRAFFIC FOR NOW 2 LINCOLN (2) MISSING, REPLACE YES IF EXISTING W/F LISTED ON W/F SIGN NOW SIGN IS NEAR ON MLK 3 NORTH WEEKS (3) REPLACE NOW- HIGH YES, ON M/WEST PKY TRAFFIC @ HAMILTON 4 O'REILLY*(2) PARK ENTRANCE - YES, ON MLK PKY ON CIRCLE TRAIL AGED, REPLACE NOW 5 O'REILLY* (2) REPLACE NOW, HIGH YES, ON MLK PKY MLK SIGN HAS BROKEN TRAFFIC BOTTOM 6 ROTARY (3) OK - REPLACE NOW YES, IF EXISTING W/F DETRACTS FROM NEW SIGN IS NEAR PLAY SET 7 WESTOVER HILLS (1) BAD - REPLACE NOW 8 WILLIAMS* (2) TALL, AGED, GRAFITTI - YES ??? REPLACE NOW 9 JALONICK (2) TALL UPRIGHT-VERY NA AGED- REPLACE NOW JALONICK (2) OK -AGED YES, ON SCOTT ST 10 BUD DANIEL (2) OK - BUT HIGH TRAFFIC YES IF EXISTING W/F VERY SMALL AT CURB - REPLACE NOW SIGN IS NEAR 11 EDGEMERE* (4) BAD- REPLACE NOW YES, ON SW PKY 12 HURSH*(4) REPLACE NOW, NO ' YES, IF EXISTING W/F SPACIOUS PARK WITH BOTTOM _ SIGN IS NEAR METAL EQUIPMENT 13 LOCH LOMAND* (4) REPLACE NOW YES PAGE 11 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b PARKS ADA ACCESS— PARK BOARDS GOALS 2023 RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD — GOAL # 2 CWF PARK BOARD, JANUARY 26, 2023 ADA access to Parks is Park Board goal # 2. Park funding was significantly increased in the FY 23 budget including $200K for a professional parks and recreation consultant review. That given, CWF council appears hesitant to fund Park upgrade projects until a new Parks Master Plan is published. Like the Park Signage and Play equipment refurbishment projects, the Park Board recommends that key, high priority projects be funded this fiscal year. It is unlikely the funded Park Review will recommend closing any of the Parks on the Board's 2023 prioritized ADA list. ADA access is a legal and moral obligation of the city. Limited funding should not be an acceptable excuse for not developing a prioritized, multi-year, prioritized list for the installation of these "curb to playset" walks. The Park Board recommends not delaying funding and starting the process before another three to five years go by without our wheelchair and/or handicapped patrons having access to CWF Parks. This requirement should run concurrently with the Park Signage and Play Equipment Refurbish projects. 2.2.1 Accessibility Special consideration should be given to providing accessible surfaces(i.e., hard surface walkways) in a play area that meets the ASTM Standard Specification for Determination of Accessibility of Surface Systems Under and Around Playground Equipment, ASTM F1951. Equipment selection, placement and type of protective surfacing are key components to ensuring children and accompanying adults with disabilities have the opportunity for children with disabilities to access and use play the playground. Suggested way ahead: 1. Develop a prioritized list of Parks lacking "curb to playset" walks. 2. CWF staff provide specifications and estimated costs to install walks. 3. CWF consider a multi-year contract to install the walkways. 4. Use this data to seek donors for ADA compliance and other Park requirements. Continued on Next Page ******** PAGE 12 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b PARK ADA COMPLIANT ACCESSIBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS PARK ACCESS LIST-JANUARY 26, 2023 NAME: BELAIR PARK LOCATION: OPAL& LESLEY (1) CATEGORY: MINI PARK RECOMMENDATION: CURB TO PLAYSET AND PICNIC SHELTER PARK BOARD ACTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED ******** NAME: LIONS PARK LOCATION: JOANNE ST. CATEGORY: MINI PARK RECOMMENDATON: CURB TO PLAY SET AND PICNIC SHELTER PARK BOARD ACTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED ******** PARK NAME: BRIDWELL PARK LOCATION: HARRISON & AVE C (1) CATEGORY: NEIGHBORHOOD RECOMMENDATION: PARK BOARD ACTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED ******** PARK NAME: EXPRESSWAY VILLAGE PARK LOCATION: MISSILE ROAD AND CASTLE DR CATEGORY: NEIGHBORHOOD RECOMMENDATION: INSTALL A PATHWAY FROM THE EXISTING PATHWAY (BETWEEN CASTLE & RHONE) TO ALLOW ADA ACCESS TO THE FOUNTAIN OFF MISSILE ROAD. PARK BOARD ACTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED ******** PARK NAME: SUNSET PARK LOCATION: 1612 CIMARRON ST CATEGORY: COMMUNITY RECOMMENDATION: CURB TO PLAYSET AND PICNIC SHELTER PARK BOARD ACTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED PAGE 13 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b _......... REFURBISH PLAY EQUIPMENT - PARK BOARD 2023 GOALS RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD — GOAL # 3 PARK BOARD,JANUARY 26, 2023 Refurbishing metal play equipment is Park Board priority# 3. Metal play equipment, slides, roundabouts,swings etc. were the vogue in the 70's and 80's. This was before plastics allowed many variations and colors. 18 Parks have 30+year old metal play equipment. One staffer remarked that "he played on them when he was a kid." Today they are unsafe,the metal surfaces burn children's skin and rough edges and protruding hardware gouge them. Most are drab. Today's Park equipment is colorful and inviting. Parents complain to Board members that they will not let their children play on this equipment. The Park Board's 2022 Park Review Report addresses this problem in depth. While some citizens have nostalgic memories of this equipment, the Park Board recommends the CWF pursue a multi-year contract to refurbish the metal play equipment. Refurbishing with industrial grade paint for the typical "mini park" costs between $2000 & $5000. The CWF funded (2023) a Parks & Recreation review by a consulting firm. This could take two to three years for completion of the review, allocating funds and letting contracts. The Park Board recommends starting the process before another three to five years passes without improving the appearance of our Parks with bright, colorful and safe play equipment. This requirement should be carried out currently with the interim Park Signage replacement project. The suggested way ahead is to: 1. Park Board develop a prioritized list of Parks with the old play equipment. The Park Board's 2022 Park Review Report contains detailed information on this equipment. 2. Ask the CWF staff to provide specifications and estimated costs to remove or refurbish the metal play equipment.. 3. Recommend CWF consider a multi-year contract for this project. 4. Following Park Board goals and recommendations, use this data to utilize Board members, news media and social media to solicit donor support for this and other Park requirements. PAGE 14 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.b BUILD PICKLE BALL COURTS - PARK BOARD 2023 GOALS RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD — GOAL # 4 PARK BOARD, JANUARY 26, 2023 Expanding the Pickle Ball program is Park Board Goal #4. During the time the Board was developing its 2023 goals, the recreation department made significant progress in expanding this fast-developing national sport. The recent Park Board survey revealed a 3.7 (of 5) positive rating. The Board supports the Pickle Ball program and outstanding results in keeping up with this trending national sport. At this time no further Park Board recommendations are necessary. Keep up the great work! PAGE 15 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b PARK BOARD DONOR PROGRAM - PARK BOARD 2023 GOALS RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD— GOAL # 5 PARK BOARD, JANUARY 26, 2023 Developing a Park Board Donor program is Park Board Goal #5. This goal received a 3.7 (of 5) on the Board Member Survey. The results indicate that the Board sees the need and supports it. Currently, the Board is in the research mode for the Donor Program. Recommended way ahead. 1. Ask Board Members to volunteer to serve on the Donor Program committee. 2. Develop the process for the program. 3. Identify potential donors. 4. Develop a marketing plan for the program. PAGE 16 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b PARK EQUIPMENT FOLLOW UP VISITS MARCH 17, 2023 Tom Taylor visited 10Parks on March 16, 2023, to determine if there had been changes relative to the old, metal play sets. Below are his comments. Loch Lamond: Has a Way Finder sign. Old bleachers have been removed. Backstop ok. Much more attractive Park. Edgemere: Replace Park name sign. Drab metal playsets and sign detract from an otherwise very attractive and functional Park. Hamilton: B/B court very nice. Has handicap access. Drab metal playsets detract from an otherwise outstanding Park. Bel Air: Attractive Mini Park. Backstop in good shape but no diamond, remove it? People playing tennis on the tennis/pickle ball court. Kiwanis: Another sponsored outstanding Park. Drab swing set seems out of place. Hurst: Appears unused. Drab metal equipment. No handicapped access. Need to evaluate keeping this space as a Park. Sign? Williams: Another Park with drab metal playsets and outdated Park name sign: custom sign is aged and has graffiti. Very nice baseball field: bleachers, back stop and dugout are very good. Nice pavilion, playset and B/B court. Spudder: Nice park but, vagrant hangout. Way Finder sign. Good access. Good B/B diamond, dugout and bleachers. Lions: No handicap access. Bridge plank repaired. Several more are aging, will need replacement in the future. Railing needs painting. Drab metal play equipment. Tennis court appears abandoned —court surface is usable -could be relined for Pickle ball. Expressway Village: Park has handicap access, disk golf. Drab metal play equipment, decaying wooden pavilion structure. Lovely fountain visible from Missile Road. Has concrete path around fountain with several benches but, no pathway to the seating. Has new, interim metal sign. Lamar: Has handicap access to nice Pavilion and nice play set. Good wood sign. Bridwell: Handicap access to playset, grill, benches and other side of Park. Way Finder sign. Abandoned B/Ball and V/Ball courts. Nice, large pavilion. Good for entertainment but home to homeless (they were using electricity. (Tom Taylor, Park Board Member, 18 Mar 2023) PAGE 17 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b Scotland:_ Did you know this Park was a Zoo? Lion's Club and others instrumental in making it happen. Very nice, well used large Park. Handicap access to play set, grills and pavilion. Concrete path meanders through the Park. Wooden bridge planks replaced. Stone bridge by playset has trip hazard at both ends. Old bridge on 144 bridge replaced with concrete bridge with metal railing. Small pavilion on top hill removed. (What is planned to replace it?) Some Park benches have broken or rotting wooden parts. Sunset: Lucy:_Drab metal play equipment Lake Wichita: Jalonick: Will visit other Parks in the next few weeks. Parks showing beautiful Spring colors. (Tom Taylor, Park Board Member, 18 Mar 2023) PAGE 18 of 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.b C 3 co _. N in a) N 0,• z L C "0U coCD `To couJ• LLJ ++ u U .0 'E o CI) O co +' y al y w C To .0 U . -C ++a a) Q IA C C O L 0 C N a) C coX ft N 03 a - E VI W C V L L Y co N � L N � Q , 3 N o co C C 0 L m' m a E a 3 v -V a) - E M CO 4, Q a CO 00 C 0 cn C E E 0 `4-.ts 0 c co co E cu N +r a N U N Z c° co `° N • E .0 e a o- L O L E a� 0 o Q- aa) c •,° 0 3 0 2 3 c C O a, N 4- a V cc N a cW�/ O co u al > - t o Y� }+ N O C L ftl L d ce L CI) Q- LA . +.. C aW a 2 O• -0 O '5 3 0 Ce > > E 0 3 o N V co y O V ma N To •Gl in `U - 'al O C4- c LV co u o E c o Om W Nco I- .- a) Q= • � - -. N W a woA O C p OC E +3 +� +' co U co +-' E vj o a, " " CO N fo Q - V C Q. al C 3 i V N +' N 0 '0 fo fo 13 a N Y a1 N a) OD �a..11 a a1 E L 3 a) L U v a) t i co N a co _c co 3 0 d Ll •E CO IA .0 E co _ L 0 co *' O 4-1 O co tU OO `~ oL N O A O ++ W - O C �. - - - O Iv D L 0 C Q. y Q- 2 OA a `L° 0 w D ai }' D +' tin CS E V1 . fo N U w > o y > C w - H in in a1 H C< '0 H "0 co c .� eB -E ° Q U coc Q N O LLIY I • cU a3 U c1 o f cB = o W , a _ca -0 E � Q a ~ Q o .� }, c o m ao Q c `° °' (I) 2' u_ - Q W ill � � c2 � � c 5 as iQ oa' -5 u) 7D0EU0 O U () ci a < E � 2U a n ca a OZ W m c � CI F— Z o to co L Q cn0 cn .Ecn 03 ° � ail HZ LLJ � e L o � � c � O a� Z = U •� c c a0 -o o nU 2 W Q 0 �CZ -0 Cl) � � W Q O °' o O 4c7)W c, N 1— ,.. • 0 } o CLtiH Ja o F Ln O � Q Ego o Q 15 c •c Ili � V Ca � Z � regj a _W 2 -° „ cm cn > o c I (B o L ° -c L o L c _ w p H - i! c � L o � � o � •J a EUIE — � c ca � � ocE� ~ Yo Z D c Q) 2 L _ - 0 cu S Y vo fn Y LL t cB c a) V 0. 0, fA ° o m c fA +3 -0 > 0_ > (B i N acn '(7) 0o2 _o2U liH a2° a °c a ac cU N O N p 4t 13 41k QQ � z OQ rn_m 0 00 0 I- I- Ce 4t Z Z CL 4t O aw W F— �o c`B c 1 CD .c o , co • oo � o in +- cf)" c o LL m a) c Q Q) ° N - oa) c W a) 2 -aca) ••- a c 0 < a) c c O as CO CO 0 � }• o v a) a) (on Z E • W L �--� To O L -0 L 0 -o0EUc � a� 6a) c EQE ° OU u) co� � cu) Y U) t(7) L a 0 0 4 0) > a Q) _ W _,c c a� .c 4 ) LJ L ( c a) 1— Z cca') � -Caci ) o a,I o r.a a 0 U) O - C 0 3 E +- U) O c +- � 0 ••-• WH •5Et +- cEE � zo cc) c3 � � U10 -0aa)) ac) 0 ° E3 a3 � Q O E E � a � � W U � -ta) c " ToD � � L a. (B Ct (B ~ z U a_ 0 2 00 m o 0 =O O Lri U < U w O (B aj I— co aj r^ o Z - Z ro a u) o i C -0 -0 O a) > 01 (B a) — a}. 3 ~ �, E c' a) 0 O c 73 W COEo (n a) a) a to V c > c .c M a) O O f c o -p O z L (T3 • cU> � U) � 0t. > E -0 L (B a•U) (I) >, Ci3 ID ID 0O U) (� a) a) (n i O L a . L o 7 (n a) (=2, C O � a a8a_ a O co co , ate) 747_, ~ Q'fV co a) c a) O c a) L o a) c CL a) 3 a) c o Y 0 c a) 0 ( .� c U) C L Q) Jf a a) C CB r L L U L 0 L -C .�,,, /O E .P co c o c ° -0 c L O CO a) r--. (B a) I— o UH +`. ao � o a () v) 0Na a3 � H ( +`. I— '-- z 0it CL Q Q Q Z CO ( Z Z I— O 't CL * Z O � � O W I= co � � w � (1) U N. a) L05 �_ Q L •L cr.) U M _a a) a) s O 0 a) � L '�� a) oca) r) o � (v C W U 1E0CD030- 0 ° � 2 E -o � iiQo-� ccv 0W Eo (nmD4- E4_ 0 < omma)>>,' aa)i � o a) o � ~ a) 3 C > .L a) v) i U U U a) C ,. C 2 a E a) L - L O .Q L }' a) 0 O a a) a a = a (v m o w a) Li c Q O o Et cn m Q E (v o (v Q ma cn a o CC (v w cv U a a) L 'Q cy) L a) a) - -o Q E (B `~ • E (D o •� -oL C a) = a) a L (v }' a) a) E s .03Q LLJ ET5 -.4 uiu: c3 a) ,, a) o " O 03 a) E 03o 3mwEo W ~ m ( (B E -5 " a0oa) (D •j E2 (v a) (v La (� Q cB •j E O O > C cOn (v s E,22caEa) C W c2E -cv) O �a•v) U (B "2 'O_ w E 'O O C . C 70 a0 (BL (B 5 .L a0 .0 (B a) aa) -o 0 a� a) += O oL a� O O L C (B C a) - Q ... 70 3m a+. Qua) m (vw 4= -0 .4 E o v) V) � +� .E a) O O C U a) c13soo o oa) EE •cf' v' a) 0 nr a) I— C - L C 0 � - — 0(t, E U) a) 0- a) c`vaaiaaio `= -oo � 0 H c3 > m � _J s_ 2 a) 70CLEtEt .c a) o .c � ciiCL a • LE l_ co0,5 C a) 03 L a) :al m 2 , O a) c) �C a) O t (B L a . L C v) >, u) o a � (v °' O 'o O O coC (v . OC cn a) z I o C a) oL >, c3 °' LLI 3a — u) E � -O />� (v (B a) N a) C_ =/� -O a) V) V) a) -c Q 5 2 (B �- �// 'pp H L V/ i H a • O co E L r--� W > a) 4--, U v) a) ••- CL a) (vELoo2 �� Ea) °) °� 2 E � w >, L I1 Q. U L L a) ±' 'Q 1 . _C cn ,a a) 0 m a Cr O a)co O 'O L - , O O a C - 6 O a J 0- 0w70 >, c3 0 0WrE Cl) 0 cn a) - xxs x a) 0 it r) < < C) 00 m0 * 0. C O LL. oz o CV W O N c n U U COS2 c _C o cn N 6 Q._ +- CI a) 0 0 c L- > c < co ca �c W _0 : } wW C Q Cl. QDo o In' o )- ctia) c a 0-Y C +- d 0 Q L w cn Q cB aE ( ° CO c o � o m � cn o CI co L11) W O) m L 2 o -0 In V ca, O > o W 13 o iY awa a) 73 -o 0 a)) n • D -o m o�sc � m w a) c o a) o cn Q c l cn L o > a) O i QT p i a�i CD Q co _o i () d cC Q N J co d 2 ro . X y > c L (n _ fB 4- c Y 0 m vil Q.c a) Dog a) (� O L (i 5 E c� cn i W m o -0 o cv o D L cn D a o N o a o m : LA 7 LiJ _ ca : 0 MITE o�S C >' 4] Y a) cn i cp O �C a) c c c and COI. OUID Qo < QJ (1) Q i te ('7 Q Q CO m I- z O O U- P. O. LLI U O W Ce I� U MINUTES OF THE FIRE FIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS' CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MARCH 9, 2023 Present: Jim I leiman. Chair ti Commission Members Laura Fidelie John Buckley Christi Klyn. Civil Service Director City Administration Staff Julia Vasquez. First Assistant City Attorney Manuel Borrego. Police Chief Guy Gilmore. Deputy Police Chief Scott Vaughn, Deputy Police Chief Kenneth Prillaman, Fire Chief Donald Hughes, Deputy Fire Chief ti Holly Morgan, HR Generalist `s 1. Call to Order Chairman Heiman called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes (1/18/23) John Buckley moved for approval. Seconded by; Laura Fidelie, the motion carried 3-0.. 3. Pursuant to Texas Local Government Code 143.035 (g), canvassing of votes to determine results of election held on February 20-21, 2023 for proposed alternate promotion system for the Wichita Falls Police Department. The vote has taken place and Commissioner Heiman reads the Order of the City of Wichita Falls Firefighters and Police Officers' Civil Service Commission considering the adoption of a revised alternate promotional system in accordance with Section 143.035 of the Texas Local Government Code. The system passed and is ratified and in full force and effect. Laura Fidelie moved for approval. Seconded by John Buckley. the motion carried 3-0. 4. Review and Approval of Amendments to the City of Wichita Falls Police Officers' cause for rejection of applicants for police officer classification as outlined in the Local Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations, Section 143.024 "Entrance Examination Notice" item 1.h. Commissioner l leiman reads as presented and notes there is one slight change on page 24. Director Christi Klyn outlines that it states the applicant who do not pass the chiefs PAGE 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.c Civil Service Commission Minutes interview are ineligible to apply for a period of two years. Chief Borrego asked to change that ineligibility to the next hiring process. Laura Fidelie moved for approval. Seconded by John Buckley, the motion carried 3-0. 5. Report from Fire Chief Chief Prillaman states that Academy will begin Monday with ten recruits, including a returning member and two that have already completed a portion of training and will be able to move into the stations much earlier. He states on a personal note, he has tendered his intent to retire and will be leaving the end of this month. He shares his appreciation of their support and participation. Commissioner Heiman wishes him well in retirement. 6. Report from Police Chief Chief Borrego thanks the commission for their time and being in attendance. Thanks the officers that participated in the promotional revamp. Thanks HR for the hours worked and Legal for their time as welt.Thanks the commission for passing the change to the interview process. Updates on the current academy process. Have nine in process to start. Touches on the lateral hiring process. Commissioner Heiman thanks all the officers involved in the presentation process for explaining things well and allowing them to understand the process better. 7. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 3:09 p.m. ,./rk, / J' Peter Heiman, Chairman PAGE 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.c WICHITA FALLS-WICHITA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH BOARD MINUTES Gp°"rwp�44 March 10, 2023 Wichita Falls-Wichita County Public Health District 1700 Third Street— Clements Conference Room Wichita Falls, Texas Public Health BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Williamson, M.D., Chair Physician— City Appointment Nichole Jefferson, RN Registered Nurse—City Appointment Jered Harlan, D.V.M. Veterinarian—City Appointment Melissa Plowman Restaurant Association —City Appointment BOARD MEMBERS EXCUSED ABSENCE: Paris Ward, M.A.B.S. Citizen At-Large—City Appointment Tonya Egloff, D.D.S. Dentist—County Appointment Raymond Forsythe Citizen At-Large—County Appointment OTHERS PRESENT: Amy K. Fagan, M.P.A. Interim Director of Health Michael Smith Council Liaison Mark Beauchamp County Commissioner I. CALL TO ORDER Dr. Williamson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 12:05 pm after a quorum of members attained. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND ABSENCES Dr. Williamson called for the review and approval of the January 13,2023 minutes. A motion was made by Nichole Jefferson to accept the minutes and Melissa Plowman seconded. The minutes were approved unanimously. Excused absences noted for Dr.Tonya Egloff, Raymond Forsythe & Paris Ward. III. HEALTH DISTRICT FLOODING UPDATE Amy spoke of the updates after the flood. Sensors were installed in the basement that will notify her if it is flooding. There has been a lot of work in the last 72 days. The power was restored last week on day 61. We have 17 staff back in the building. We had no disruption of services except for the Lab and the day right after Christmas. Everyone should be back in the building by March 17th, St. Patrick's Day. Then we will have a Homecoming Party. Mr. Smith asked about the moneys coming out of the Budget. Amy stated no money will come out of the FY23 general fund for Health Budget. The City did have Insurance coverage and will cover the large equipment. Amy has offered to use some of our Budget to cover paint, paper and flooring that was damaged. The City has a special fund for the flood and is replacing things that need to be replaced. PAGE 1 of 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.d Mr. Smith asked if we increased the energy efficiency of the building or modernized it any? Amy said yes, energy efficiencies are built in with the new Chiller and switch gear. It is hard to balance the temperature in the building and this efficiencies should really help. Mr. Smith thanked Amy for all her work. Amy thank him, but said the employees are the ones that have done so much. Amy said we will be starting a new renovation of the front reception area and restrooms Dr. Williamson said he was glad we continued all our services without interruption and the City was so supportive. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OVERVIEW Samantha Blair introduced herself and that she is the Environmental Administrator. She wanted to tell everyone about who they are and what they do. Environmental has 1.0 full and some part time workers. There is a Sr.Admin Clerk and 8 inspectors, 2 are Public Health Officers, 6 are Sanitarians, 2 are in training. She has part time Vector control employees that spray for mosquitos. Their primarily responsible for retail Food Permits and Inspections. Public and Semi-Public Aquatic Facility Permits and Inspections. Grease Trap and Waste Haulers Permit and Inspections. (Limited to City of Wichita Falls) Lodging Permits and Inspections Body Art Establishment Permits and Inspections. (Limited to City of Wichita Falls) Public Health and Safety Inspections of: school buildings, daycare facilities and foster homes. On-Site Sewage Facility (septic system) Permits and Inspections. Soft Serve testing and inspections. An inspector on-call 24/7 for after hour emergencies and temporary events on weekends. They do go into Clay County and inspect City owned lake lots around Arrowhead and Kickapoo Lakes. Last year they issued 1,937 permits, 4,929 inspections and 521 complaints. Each program is conducted throughout the county and the programs collect fees for services. In FY 2022, $379,663.12 was generated in revenue from fees. The Environmental Health Division also provided several educational opportunities to their facilities. Mr. Smith asked what are the most common complaints? Samantha said the most common complaints start with customer service at a restaurants then food. Trouble with Mosquitos are also very common. As far as daycares we do a facility check and a kitchen inspection. We are not the primary authority. In 2022 City Council approved a suggested revision to the Lodging ordinance. The goal was to ensure the ordinance was clear on what constituted a lodging establishment and to ensure the rules were in line with the Food Establishment ordinance. With the advent of short-term residential rentals, it was important to ensure language was clear as to what constituted a short-term rental, a bed and breakfast and a lodging establishment. A short term rental is NOT regulated in any way by this ordinance. Other changes included clarifications on permit posting, bed bug management procedures, allowance of establishment provided corded cooking equipment in kitchenettes, and language updates such as removing gendered pronouns. In Addition Environmental Health Division is also responsible for mosquito surveillance and control. The vector control program has continued to strengthen its focus on increasing surveillance of mosquitoes in Wichita County. In Wichita County we have 40 different varieties of mosquitoes. 2 PAGE 2 of 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.d Surveillance is the foundation of a strong mosquito control program and was emphasized so as to establish reliable baseline knowledge on which informed decisions about remediation can be made. Mosquito surveillance includes sampling for all forms of the mosquito life cycle including eggs, larvae, pupae and adults. Over the 2022 season, "stink water" baited, gravid adult mosquito trap collections were made and sent to the DSHS for arbovirus testing. Of the samples submitted, 3 returned positive for West Nile Virus. Other forms of adult surveillance used include the use of dry ice baited CDC Light Traps. Mosquito breeding sites are any place water is allowed to stand for at least 48 hrs. The mosquito breeding sites routinely checked by the vector control program include everything for irrigation culverts, potholes and abandoned tires to entire city parks or mile-long roadside ditches. A total of 133 blister packs were distributed to citizens in the 2022 season and the basic information of all recipients was recorded. The program operates a fleet of truck mounted Ultra-Low Volume (ULV) pesticide sprayers meant to kill flying adults. Over the season, 85 spray missions were accomplished. Adulticide applications were made with Deltagard or Fyfanon EW. Samantha showed pictures and described the different type of Mosquitos we have in Wichita County. In Wichita County the West Nile Virus is our biggest concern with the Mosquitos. Samantha went over some Texas Legislative Session Bills to watch for. Amy spoke about ordinances and let the Board members know what the procedure is. And what the Board members responsibility is. Anytime we have an ordinances that we need to change, we work on it internally. We have stakeholder meetings with any of the involved parties. Then we take it to the Board of Health for them to give their input. If there are changes they are made and brought back the parties involved. It is about a 6 month process. Dr. Williamson asked about church kitchens being invited to attend kitchen safety training. Samantha said yes and they should also have a food handler's card. The larger kitchens are inspected regularly. They are talked to by the inspectors and questions are answered. The inspectors make sure they know all the rules. Melissa asked if churches need commercial kitchens. Samantha said yes, if they are routinely cooking for the public. If they are cooking for a congregation then they can have a regular cooking kitchen. V. NEXT MEETING DATE Next meeting will be May 12, 2023. VI. ADJOURN Dr.Williamson adjourned the meeting at 12:50. Sig ature 7 keii-h ) I f,eew<50N t1 Print- Keith Williamson, MD, Chair, Toriya Egloff, D.D.S., Vice-Chair, Paris Ward, MA, BS, Secretary 3 PAGE 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.d Wichita Falls Park Board Meeting March 23, 2023 W.F. Recreation Center 600 11 th Street Room 205 Time: 1:30pm Presiding: Jim Heiman Members Present: Dorcas Chasteen, Sandy Fleming, Patrick Hearn, Jessica Traw, Thomas Taylor, Josh Phillips, Michael Battaglino, Larri Jean Jacoby Members Absent: Alan Donaldson, Simeon Hendrix City Council Representative: Steve Jackson Other: Scott McGee Terry Points Blake Jurecek I CALL TO ORDER: Jim Heiman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes from February 23, 2023 were put before the Board for approval. A motion was made to Amend the February mintues. (See Below). AMENDED MINUTES: February 23, 2023 a motion was made to add "The Board Approved 5 Goals/Objectives for the 2023-2024" (See Attached) Michael Battaglino approved the added amendment and Josh Phillips second the motion. 3. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT: A. Recreation: Scott McGee • See Attached Recreation Report B. Parks: Terry Points • See Attached Parks Report C. Lake Wichita Revitalization Committee: • Veterans memorial plaza bricks are in, date for installment TBD. D. Circle Trail Update: • A restroom is being installed at the O'Reilly park, which this a about a half waypoint on the trail. PAGE 1 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e E. Parks Review Update: • See attached F. Other Business, Announcements, Comments: • The Master Plan for 2023 has been placed on the City Website for bids, public can review for approximately 30 days. • The Parks Review Committee suggested City's website be reviewed and the Park Board committee's names and photo be placed on the Park Board section. • Request for the Planning Division to brief on the CDBG grants to Park Board, on the May agenda. Meeting was adjourned at 2: Opm F. r Signature: 07Zi : 'L ., Jim eiman (First Chair) PAGE 2 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.e Recreation Report 3/23/2023 50 Plus Zone daily numbers for the week at 219. 50 Plus Zone hosting Gospel Music Night Thursday 3/23. Recreation Class enrollment up to 51 for March. Annual Fishing Rodeo in cooperation with Texas Parks and Wildlife and sponsored by Raising Cane Chicken was held on Saturday 3/4. Over 400 attended the event with perfect weather and trout up to 15 inches long March Movie Madness entertained more than 100 kids during spring break. Annual Easter Egg Hunt is this Saturday at the South Sports Complex. Still taking applicants for Summer Camp Leaders. Ribbon Cutting opening the new turf fields was held Monday 3/20. Spring Softball begins tonight 3/21. Spring Volleyball begins next week Registration for 5 v 5 Soccer begins this week. First Youth Baseball Tournament is this weekend 3/25-26. Taking applications for swimming pool staff for summer Weeks Tennis Center has been cleaned up and some repairs made. Hamilton Tennis Center hosted JV High School tournament on Monday and will host IA District tournament this Thursday and Novice/Youth 12 U Saturday 3/25. Council approved agreement for new management company to manage tennis and pickleball programs and facilities on Tu. 3/21. I � 4 1' , --� • • • • ro PAGE 3 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e i y VIT,' ' '' . .� � . ' °..- .fi e � •" • . � � -•"�" �` � .• , _ a � -� ,� ��i e / . � . 'P'' .� � " r • 'i` lg... - II�_ 1 f � � . a r tk 1 y ....di. , .,..i __. -,,,..,.". ' . t' '''' . 1.1: ' ' 1 c --. ..,,,' ,, 4'4.'47 ;, '' 'I r. w y 4'44 Vic_ m ,� �— itiotoas . . 1 .. — ,. 10�- "- • - • ► 41- ,a. ,a., r kIfik* _.,„,,,,,, ."Air MI L a.. , ,... .._, . . , PAGE 4 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e Parks Maintenance Disc Golf CDBG Williams Arrived Install April/May Kiwanis three bay 60'zip line. Kiwanis Grant Toddler Musical in Lucy ordered. Arts Council Grant Playground General Fund. Playground CDBG Morningside Rotary Zip Line Ordered April/May Picnic Tables Ordered April/May Orielly restroom building being installed. April Hamilton Shelter Ordered April/May 18 trees planted at Hamilton. WCMA Funded All new signs for parks have been delivered. We will install them as time allows. Notes from Tom PARK EQUIPMENT FOLLOW UP VISITS MARCH 17, 2023 Tom Taylor visited 10Parks on March 16, 2023,to determine if there had been changes relative to the old, metal play sets. Below are his comments. Loch Lamond: Has a Way Finder sign. Old bleachers have been removed. Backstop ok. Much more attractive Park. Edgemere: Replace Park name sign. Drab metal playsets and sign detract from an otherwise very attractive and functional Park. Drab playsets were sandblasted and painted 2 months ago. New Ninja playground installed 2022 Hamilton: B/B court very nice. Has handicap access. Drab metal playsets detract from an otherwise outstanding Park. Drab metal playsets were sandblasted and painted in spring 2022. New shelter w/electric, tables and trash receptacles ordered. Bel Air: Attractive Mini Park. Backstop in good shape but no diamond, remove it? People playing tennis on the tennis/pickle ball court. Sandblasted and painted the playground. Several parks have backstops only with no diamonds.These are for practice only Kiwanis:Another sponsored outstanding Park. Drab swing set seems out of place. PAGE 5 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.e Kiwanis has requested keeping the Drab swing set. It will be sandblasted and painted once the new three bay zip line and other new expansion projects are installed.They are hoping for$220,000 expansion. Hurst: Appears unused. Drab metal equipment. No handicapped access. Need to evaluate keeping this space as a Park. Sign? Parks cannot be sold or abandoned without having the public vote on it. We have had several meetings over the years about using a portion of this park for a drainage easement so residential development could be done on Southmoor. Dr.One of our request has been a new playground and other park improvements. After Harry Pattersons death,this project has gone cold for the moment. Williams: Another Park with drab metal playsets and outdated Park name sign: custom sign is aged and has graffiti. Very nice baseball field: bleachers, back stop and dugout are very good. Nice pavilion, playset and B/B court. Williams Park has certain areas where "new" structures that could impede the flow of water in the floodway are restricted. We didn't get to the Drab playsets to repaint them yet. Spudder: Nice park but, vagrant hangout. Way Finder sign. Good access. Good B/B diamond, dugout and bleachers. Vagrants have always been at Spudder. It just seems to place to be. Lions: No handicap access. Bridge plank repaired. Several more are aging,will need replacement in the future. Railing needs painting. Drab metal play equipment. Tennis court appears abandoned —court surface is usable - could be relined for Pickle ball. Handicap access to the park is at the corner of JoAnn and Kathrine. We could use another when funding becomes available. We have around 25 trail bridges in our park and trail system. Most are metal frame and wood. The wood is frequently inspected by park workers, if a board is broken, we try to get it repaired that day or caution flag the bridge.The metal on these bridges is called Corten steel and is PAGE 6 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e designed for long life as is and is not to be painted. We didn't get to the Drab playsets to repaint. r'',',+'"": .1:xi•' '''',,, 4.! . N.'. __,.z.4 . `-am` 4.r..:..'W ;r• « +::,gyp-- ,.. !RA y ;..-,i ,.-w.£,&',ry ,ar -•g.A'� " "rT" """' ` "+ ':.'tr., . "- ". ,�ra.x.-.' 'n", -'�-�km i '�'X'*`'+ 4s+�a. _ .. Expressway Village: Park has handicap access, disk golf. Drab metal play equipment, decaying wooden pavilion structure. Lovely fountain visible from Missile Road. Has concrete path around fountain with several benches but, no pathway to the seating. Has new, interim metal sign. The Drab Playset is only about ten years old and most last fifteen to twenty years old before they are replaced.A five or six foot walk way from the park to the pond would be a nice addition. Interim Sign? _ _ ,., ,. ..--„..t.,,-., , ,,, ,,. ..,,,,,; ,..„.;,-.44'9iie- , - .. „ _ U i . w , a . - e. Lamar: Has handicap access to nice Pavilion and nice play set. Good wood sign. Playset has been targeted for CDBG replacement 2023/2024. Over half of this unit has been removed due to vandalism and age. It is about eighteen years old. PAGE 7 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e Bridwell: Handicap access to playset,grill, benches and other side of Park. Way Finder sign. Abandoned B/Ball and V/Ball courts. Nice, large pavilion. Good for entertainment but home to homeless (they were using electricity. CDBG funding for a new fountain, new multi-use court and a new baseball diamond is uncertain at this time. Homeless come and go in Bridwell Park. PAGE 8 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.e Parks Board Approved Goals/Objectives 2023-2024 #1 Goal Signage To review and replace worn/broken park signs and replace with consistent signage. #2 Goal Accessibility To review parks usage and consider which parks would most benefit with standard accessibility to main pavilions and play areas. #3 Goal Refurbish/Replace Play Equipment Review and inform Parks staff of broken play equipment throughout our parks system. Repair or replace as needed. #4 Goal Pickleball To expand the number of and quality of Pickleball courts throughout the community. #5 Goal Donor Program To actively encourage and seek out possible donors to help improve our parks equipment and offerings. PAGE 9 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.e PARKS ACCESSIBLITY — PARK BOARDS GOALS 2023 RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD —GOAL # 2 CWF PARK BOARD, MARCH 23, 2023 The recent Park Board survey revealed a 3.7 (of 5) positive rating. The Board supports the accessibility program. Accessibility to CWF Parks is Park Board Goal # 2. All citizens should have access to CWF Parks and Recreation facilities. 2.2.1 Accessibility Special consideration should be given to providing accessible surfaces(i.e., hard surface walkways) in a play area that meets the ASTM Standard Specification for Determination of Accessibility of Surface Systems Under and Around Playground Equipment,ASTM F1951. Equipment selection, placement and type of protective surfacing are key components to ensuring children and accompanying adults with disabilities have the opportunity to access and use play equipment. Park funding was significantly increased in the FY 23 budget including $200K for a professional parks and recreation consultant review. That given, CWF Council appears hesitant to fund Park upgrade projects until a new Parks Master Plan is published. Like the Park Signage and Play equipment refurbishment projects, the Park Board recommends that key, high priority projects be funded this fiscal year. Limited funding should not be an acceptable excuse for not developing a prioritized, multi-year, prioritized list for the installation of these "curb to playset" walks. The Park Board recommends not letting time pass further without addressing accessibility to our Parks . Park accessibility should run concurrently with the Park Signage and Play Equipment Refurbishment Goals. Suggested way ahead: 1. Develop a prioritized list of Parks without "curb to playset" walks. 2. CWF staff provide specifications and estimated costs to install walks. 3. CWF consider a multi-year contract to install the walkways. 4. Use this data to seek donors for accessibility. PAGE 10 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e INTERIM PARK SIGNAGE - PARK BOARD 2023 GOALS RECOMMENED WAY AHEAD — GOAL # 1 PARK BOARD, MARCH 23, 2023 The recent Park Board survey revealed a 4 (of 5) positive rating. The Board supports the accessibility program. This the "5" rating in the survey. Park funding increased significantly in the FY 23 budget. $200K was allocated for a professional parks and recreation consultant. CFW Council is hesitant to fund large items (play sets) that may be obsolete, depending on the Parks & Rec Consultant Review recommendations. - Sign replacement priority is based on sign condition, high traffic location, & neighborhood. Long term goal is to eventually replace all park signs with standard, inviting, functional & modern signage. - Generally, signs are made of wood &sited at Park entrances. Most are "worn out" —broken and deteriorating. The Park Board recommends an evaluation of current Park signage and Way Finder signage listing Park names. The Board also recommends to the CWF Council, that some items such as broken and eroding park name signs be replaced in FY 23. These "worn out" signs send the message that the CWF does not care about parks. The Park signage requirement should run concurrently with the ADA Curb to Playset and play equipment refurbish projects. Below are supportive comments relative to the Park Board's prioritized sign replacement project. 1. Three have been replaced with new, smaller metal signs. The Board does not consider these metal signs a permanent solution, rather an interim solution. 2. The long-term park signage replacement requirement is expensive and may have to wait. Way ahead: a. Relook Way Finder signs on Southwest Parkway (281 to Kell Blvd./82). b. Relook Way Finder signs on Martin Luther King Blvd. c. Relook Way Finder signage on Midwestern Parkway. d. Relook Way Finder signage in area of MLK Center (Smith St, Homes & Tulsa). e. Relook Jalonick Park- a sprawling Park adjacent to Sunnyside Multipurpose Center. Prioritized List on Next Page ******** PAGE 11 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e CWF PARK SIGNAGE - # 1 PARK BOARD PRIORITY - JAN 26, 2023 (PARK CATEGORY CODES: MINI = 1; NEIGHBORHOOD = 2; COMMUNITY = 3; LARGE URBAN = 4) (REGIONAL= 5; MISC = 6; RECREATION &SPORTS = 7) PR MAJOR ROAD # PARK NAME & SIGN CONDITION WAY FINDER I COMMENTS DISTRICT COMMENTS RECOMMENDATION 1 ROSELAWN (3) REPLACE NOW HIGH NEED NEW W/F STYLE REPLACE WITH METAL TRAFFIC FOR NOW 2 LINCOLN (2) MISSING, REPLACE YES IF EXISTING W/F LISTED ON W/F SIGN NOW SIGN IS NEAR ON MLK 3 ' NORTH WEEKS (3) I REPLACE NOW- HIGH YES, ON M/WEST PKY TRAFFIC @ HAMILTON 4 O'REILLY*(2) PARK ENTRANCE - YES, ON MLK PKY ON CIRCLE TRAIL AGED, REPLACE NOW 5 O'REILLY* (2) REPLACE NOW, HIGH YES, ON MLK PKY MLK SIGN HAS BROKEN TRAFFIC BOTTOM 6 ROTARY (3) OK - REPLACE NOW YES, IF EXISTING W/F DETRACTS FROM NEW SIGN IS NEAR PLAY SET 7 WESTOVER HILLS (1) BAD - REPLACE NOW 8 WILLIAMS* (2) TALL, AGED, GRAFITTI- YES REPLACE NOW 9 JALONICK (2) TALL UPRIGHT-VERY NA AGED- REPLACE NOW JALONICK (2) OK-AGED YES, ON SCOTT ST 10 BUD DANIEL(2) OK - BUT HIGH TRAFFIC YES IF EXISTING W/F VERY SMALL AT CURB - REPLACE NOW SIGN IS NEAR 11 EDGEMERE* (4) BAD-REPLACE NOW YES, ON SW PKY 12 HURSH*(4) REPLACE NOW, NO YES, IF EXISTING W/F SPACIOUS PARK WITH BOTTOM SIGN IS NEAR METAL EQUIPMENT 13 LOCH LOMAND* (4) REPLACE NOW YES PAGE 12 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e REFURBISH PLAY EQUIPMENT - PARK BOARD 2023 GOALS RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD — GOAL# 3 PARK BOARD, MARCH 23, 2023 Refurbishing play and seating equipment is Park Board goal #3. This goal received a 4.0 (of 5) on the Board Member Survey. The results indicate that the Board sees and supports the need. Metal play equipment, slides, roundabouts, swings, seating etc. were the vogue in the 70's and 80's. This was before plastics allowed many variations and finishes. 18 Parks have 30+ year old metal play equipment. One staffer remarked that "he played on them when he was a kid." Today they are unsafe, the metal surfaces burn children's skin and rough edges and protruding hardware gouge them. Several bleachers and seating are broken and/or "worn out." They are potential safety hazards and require repair or removal. Today's Park equipment is colorful and inviting. Parents complain to Board members that they will not let their children play on this equipment. The Park Board's 2022 Park Review Report addresses this problem in depth. While some citizens have nostalgic memories of this equipment, the Park Board recommends the CWF pursue a multi-year contract to refurbish the metal play equipment. Refurbishing with industrial grade paint for the typical "Mini Park" costs between $2000 & $5000. The CWF funded (2023) a Parks & Recreation review by a consulting firm. This could take two to three years for completion of the review, allocating funds and letting contracts. The Park Board recommends starting the process before another three to five years passes without improving the appearance of our Parks with bright, colorful and safe play equipment. This requirement should be carried out currently with the interim Park Signage replacement project. The suggested way ahead is to: 1. Park Board develop a prioritized list of Parks with the old play equipment. The Park Board's 2022 Park Review Report contains detailed information on this equipment. 2. Ask the CWF staff to provide specifications and estimated costs to remove or refurbish the metal play equipment.. 3. Recommend CWF consider a multi-year contract for this project. 4. Following Park Board goals and recommendations, use this data to utilize Board members, news media and social media to solicit donor support for this and other Park requirements. PAGE 13 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e PARK BOARD DONOR PROGRAM - PARK BOARD 2023 GOALS RECOMMENDED WAY AHEAD —GOAL # 4 PARK BOARD, MARCH 23, 2023 This goal received a 3.7 (of 5) on the Board Member Survey. The results indicate that the Board sees and supports the need. Currently, the Board is in the research mode for the Donor Program. Recommended way ahead. 1. Ask Board members to serve on the Donor Program committee. 2. Outline a process for the Donor Program. 3. Develop a marketing plan for the program. 4. Identify potential donors. PAGE 14 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.e PARK EQUIPMENT FOLLOW UP VISITS MARCH 17, 2023 Tom Taylor visited 10Parks on March 16, 2023, to determine if there had been changes relative to the old, metal play sets. Below are his comments. Loch Lamond: Has a Way Finder sign. Old bleachers have been removed. Backstop ok. Much more attractive Park. Edgemere: Replace Park name sign. Drab metal playsets and sign detract from an otherwise very attractive and functional Park. Hamilton: B/B court very nice. Has handicap access. Drab metal playsets detract from an otherwise outstanding Park. Bel Air: Attractive Mini Park. Backstop in good shape but no diamond, remove it? People playing tennis on the tennis/pickle ball court. Kiwanis: Another sponsored outstanding Park. Drab swing set seems out of place. Hurst: Appears unused. Drab metal equipment. No handicapped access. Need to evaluate keeping this space as a Park. Bottom part of sign missing. Williams: Another Park with drab metal playsets and outdated Park name sign: custom sign is aged and has graffiti. Very nice baseball field: bleachers, back stop and dugout are very good. Nice pavilion, playset and B/B court. Spudder: Nice park but, vagrant hangout. Way Finder sign. Play set had . Good B/B diamond and backstop; metal dugout benches and bleachers. Lions: No handicap access. Bridge plank repaired. Several more are aging, will need replacement in the future. Railing needs painting. Drab metal play equipment. Tennis court appears abandoned —court surface is usable - could be relined for Pickle ball. Expressway Village: Park has handicap access, disk golf. Drab metal play equipment, decaying wooden pavilion structure. Lovely fountain visible from Missile Road. Has concrete path around fountain with several benches but, no pathway to the seating. Has new, interim metal sign. Lamar: Has handicap access to nice Pavilion and nice play set. Good wood sign. Bridwell: Handicap access to playset,grill, benches and other side of Park. Way Finder sign. B/Ball field with good backstop and dugouts; no bleachers. Nice, large pavilion. Good for entertainment but home to homeless (they were using electricity. (Tom Taylor, Park Board Member, 18 Mar 2023) PAGE 15 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e Scotland: Did you know this Park was a Zoo? Lion's Club and others instrumental in making it happen. Very nice, well used large Park. Handicap access to play set,grills and pavilion. Concrete path meanders through the Park. Wooden bridge planks replaced. Stone bridge by playset has trip hazard at both ends. Old bridge on 144 bridge replaced with concrete bridge with metal railing. Small pavilion on top hill removed. (What is planned to replace it?) Some Park benches have broken or rotting wooden parts. Sunset: Lucy:_Drab metal play equipment Lake Wichita: Jalonick: Will visit other Parks in the next few weeks. Parks showing beautiful Spring colors. (Tom Taylor, Park Board Member, 18 Mar 2023) PAGE 16 of 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.e N CD C 3 Nin al in W C) H � z C u fC W C C) Q ~ s *' a f° Cu Co ++ tEl U t t 'C al z al O fp ++ N w L C cCN a V N — : C C L 'u C N al O C n3 x W N V , co Q s ' > N o C C L 3 rrs m a O a) a 3v2 a) E E Q a o CO cif C . : E it Z 0 n3 c ru co ru E s 0 +� fC d v O +, a1 N i fC �N, V N a1 Q O G1 H L1 al *+ C Q. .1.1), N cV 0 frs E ,_ N •5 E Z 'u 2 a Q- O O 0 Q- s- a3, c •c 0 3 U m 3 a ~- C o au N o0 0 um V 3 C cu al +L+ E m N W a1 > ts v- �O - s CID +O+ U CO C fuC E H 'C L a co +� t _ a o~c Q. c .Q •0 o •� 3 O CC > > E o Z C U W 3s '0 uv -0 N To oC , inO fU -C a O 'a> C +, C 3 L W CC E C u o 0.0 co 0.0 N W L _ in ;g • -0 CD t Q. 0 m= u CO e.9 8 H cc aC O. C39s ,a P u a 0 a bO C CD CU a E . Z aU co N Q. .5 co t co z O a E 'C N .> E ++ >. N Q. ru L CQ ffs u i O fC s- Ce " C u O 3 ,O +' CD al i u H 0 L O 00 0 0 a1 CO ++ 0 v-. +�, 0- >• ) (13 H Yco CU 0 0 '0+, -0 Ce -a L1 CO a c CU C n 3 D ' a al > 0in > C C) -0 I— vwf i%- al I— Ce '0 C I— 10 CD C LL c � � - U � CD E N c c c L N I� O O -c O o Q U a) m a) c -0 co Z Y +• a) _ .§ CZ Q 0CCZ >> Eca 0w < -o L � -0 En— QF- a) +- 4- c 0 c�a a_ o -ttiiO L (a (a U N Z Q C a) U U 0) a)W O C N N C L 'U CD Q oc}as cn -0oiUo CI 0U) vim) b- Q E o ° U a D -t cz Q O w � � Z c � ca L — W E.. 5 a) ^( a) a o Z O V •(A c c Q i V Q a) c, a)u) U C W U 7) ca) •� C6 O 1� -ao � � o •� � W N 0 � � D � o o co H Q O � Q EEO o d = � •L L a) ca 0 N W U (n •° > v Ce Ca_ -0 Z - to j � a I > Q W 2 a 0) cn 0 C +� C -Ci U L C CZ 0 W >, L }, (73 O, a CL Q c O (a a) _ ce W •E ca �O a) CO 0) O LL - -c o 0 c a) ,C c O C C . a) > 4) •U e- ELL L i �U ca O 40 +- (n 4 ca ca O O s O a)Q a) C9 E � _. 73 U c >' QE ~ Y c �0. N � L� � oa • ao }Ei_ c ,5o LL 03asca � ca -0 • c }, 2 C Ec - Q0 ZC a a) CZ U _ CD i . -0a) cca2 oO ca c o o U �C C ° ca cn ca O t) a) L N ricn •v) Do2 -02U LL0O •LOEcaCC N LL I— L -0 0- c ca Q._ — U N 0 4t CC 00 ' Z CO (,7 H Ce4# Z Z d W O N O ce u U u U C � nU • �/) C CVO 0 -O O o O IQ m Q) C Z Y Q) O� � w = U < _Ca -0 E 3 o >- m w c W -0 � 1Uo 0QE � � U ,Lu CO0 W H a z VL c CZ CZ WQ .� o- C IX Ia) 0 co a) c - Q) c c3 CO 0 > 0 00 H o M Z - 0 -O � Cl) > " •. o • w L LU � a acna) >, � 0 a ._ N w 0 .C cB E L N cn Q) U 2 (Q i 0 • O) a- Q) Q) Q) c i Q) '� + O Q) O L . cB C O C 2 UH . o -0 O 0- (7 0 � CL Q Q m O Z CL Z w C.) cn o) N 4 Q) 0 Q) ++ (0 U L C) O 0z U 4-• w -0 (6 0 C N I p O E .t a3 2O O - O -. c 0 Hw 4 O C C E O m E dQ } O a) (n 0 Q-0 - 0 t .. 4— 0 0 C a) c L L (A �[ Z O L L 0 U C a +- O .L a) (A Q C L 06 0. cr a) O a) _o O a_ a) a_ a- '- +� a-cn (6 -0 s_ C V) CO Q E (a 2 2 (a L - C) ^ E a //0� I _0 L O_ W, C +•+ LL E ^(6 E r o Q) a) I..L .• LIJ - C a) .E +- cU �a) m +� E t _o 3 0 Cn O '" �W • s -, va a) a .o O > � � c v Vc ccOOoc � t3 oo (13a) E20)O0.) a) :- U (o > L (a O (aaQ � .t � � � �WU c Ica c2a) coEa) c jY c6a,`— OY cn O 0 0 (612 L (a o O 0 O O a) ►— c O- („ '" O O t U //�� M�y� coL LL L U W L V1 Q �/70 3 a-c Cl) O Y co L p a v) _- -p O co Q •U O E a) c o (a 3 0 N Oco L- r => � UEE ato ,Z -0 I— ca > m _J _J 2 ra a -0 c L E Q) c > �_ +- co O Y a) O _c i I- L O O > O C .� O Q C (a H U — a) O O O -0 co -2 LO O Ec vv)) o a) o ac) a > c) 2 N a) 0 _c C 0 .. N N (6 O C N U L > a C (n H O - N EL, jN > c(0 Qate) (0 ,� 2 (L3 co : �>,, (a .E O O O c 0 U a D a_ a c (A .-% a) +- U H N a M E U D U L C E 2 O 0 2 O C v) .c O i 72 O ( U ( a C U i L a) '- O L O (6 U a) - co a) F- 0 _ a) (6 O O cn0N (1 (a � Hcn : H " c Ou .0 >,> oc 0 p ;# 4 4 < (n O OZ I— IY Z O u. 0 c � aWH00 g W CLU ' ON c• ciC c)) U 4(7) Lci-o U •U ' co O O C N a? Q a) j Y >' a) j a) M a - .- O o o co C LO 0 -O O U O E j O Nz W L 0- it C O-U V N cB CZ Y a) cB C w 2 I E LO L U Q CJF I Q E L. "co a) 0) a) -- O L (B -0 (n c Q — O O (B U O . ' O (B m O .0 °- o m LL Q C "� O U -c cB o cB a 1 w Q 7 L (I) V) p)m 7 V) U E .= a O 1 c� 5 � UUUZa) � C Ca) Ec L Q L "Q N . � 0) 03 L a E U O m ' O CD C O CO LO O a O (B < U) a L f CO N O a CO cB U -0 L a) O Y -o L 5 L (n E (� o •.- 'Q Q ."' .--; a 0 _ a a) a�_ co �--' a) a) o HZ E cB v cn a) o E o L Y "a a) l i C •C •a s Q U 03 nCO CO III Om `� E 5 -a• aD a) a) ,_ "a �Y U •- O O O O O >, E Ow V Q > O • > C (n (B a) C W c2> E E0 ), ° 'E0) a-.�' > O O O .O- "a Qc O- L C � D O2 a•, 5 co a) a a) -O .-. D E co a 0- L O 00 C a) 4- Cl.) ID < � a) m co ;= '~ -o g E a) ( co 1 U CO .-- .c a) O O > U ::::1:11 E > C > o5-C Y C UL E C ° . 1Y > C CD E C) Q_ u1 aC Y a)co a) m � -pC cB � -c • cB .-- Tn C (n a) = O A O (Ba) a) C ILI C n!o (n v) L E U (n o E L H E a) O : E 15-: : CLO '�Ly-. (� > .--� Q � W Lin aU4) ! a) a) U Ua) "pa c — C O ,— Y (ncn5 a) _a Q) U - •_a, C) U >,.� a) V)iz' "O -0 C O yi C p J a CUcB _c O00OW E Q cnD In a�i � � ° a�i' ma � 1— U _0 aU 0 CL J 0 0• co co CO Ce4*Iz z O w'( O UN ~ o rx (/W) U cw 0 i ' . 1 w Q (I) J- a) N < ,a) o 0 N Z w Q (I) m Q Q O L°- } O_L o w U �_ w 0 O cK3 c W 1— w Z = ° V) O •1 co W H O °6 W a -taE ( "O CD w , Cl) W 045 C aff 46cn Y i: - Cl) O OU CD Q- 14. a+ 00 CO C Y � a L zt !!11 L UJ co (I) -cs (1) : rw,,,g,,r),----- , , „, . , ...„,„,,.,..,,,,,.., C C , �r ' S'- Y'. V) O cm / Jr �' w" m cB ; � w �. .c1c c E c cric3OO '03 <I Q. 1 CO Q , .„ o k '' l,k'e. O OM .'' w3 - ' r sr war rig . 3 / 0 Qz IA2 o / ƒ < 0 z w 0 CO 4- 0 / \~ � . • \ \ ^ y » yam&„ \ , / t / \ /\ 2,. • % . \ - \ . . . \ : /\ ? (it 2 , \ \ / 1 -,1- a) N 6 O O N Z w2 Ur W Q ~ d Q 0 z W CD 1. ,: rM Li .° L - x,V ``- Gig „ . . . 00 i 4_ o co ro R� q� \i sx t^ .Fil . ,. :....„...".. . , . .'1,- . ,-: i aN� y � y e _ viowY SS •ww � � • r - ,� • t.',. J LANDMARK COMMISSION MINUTES April 25, 2023 MEMBERS PRESENT: Michele Derr • Chairwoman John Dickinson •Member Christy Graham • Member Joel Hartmangruber ■ Member Andy Lee •Member Noros Martin •P&Z Liaison Marcela Medellin •Member Janel Ponder Smith ■ Member Monica Aguon, Assistant City Attorney ■City Staff Terry Floyd, Development Services Director •City Staff Chris Horgen, Public Information Officer •City Staff Karen Montgomery-Gagne, Principal Planner/HPO •City Staff Christal Cates, Senior Administrative Assistant ■City Staff ABSENT: Nadine McKown •Vice-Chairwoman Tim Brewer •Council Liaison GUESTS: None I. Call to Order, Introductions and Welcome Chairwoman Michele Derr called the meeting to order at 12:00 p.m. Ms. Derr had Commission members, staff and guests, introduce themselves. II. Review & Approval of Minutes from: March 28th, 2023 Chairwoman Derr called for review and approval of the March 28th, 2023 Landmark Commission meeting minutes. Mr. Noros Martin made a motion to approve the minutes, Ms. Janel Ponder-Smith seconded the motion. Minutes were unanimously approved 8-0. Regular Agenda III. Action Item: Review & Approve — 719 Scott Avenue: Nomination: First Wichita National Bank— National Register of Historic Places (Downtown Wichita Falls) Ms. Karen Montgomery-Gagne presented the case and stated staff was notified March 10, 2023, by the Texas Historical Commission (THC) of a nomination to the National Register of Historic Places for the First Wichita National Bank, located at 719 Scott Avenue in downtown Wichita Falls. Ms. Gagne gave a brief overview of nomination eligibility and criteria stating, there are four main criteria that apply beyond meeting the basic minimums (being at least 50-years old; having historic character, etc). Additionally, a property must PAGE 1 of 4 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.f Landmark Commission 2 April 25,2023 also have integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association for listing consideration. The main criteria include: A. Being associated with important events that have contributed significantly to the broad pattern of our history. B. Being associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. C. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; or represent the work of a master; or possess high artistic values; or represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. D. Have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Ms. Gagne explained the original structure, known as the Clint Wood Building, was designed by architect E. Stanley Field and associate J.F. Lauck and constructed in 1919 as a seven-story high-rise commercial building in a L-shape with reinforced concrete and clad in brick and cast stone. The structure originally cost $750,000 and housed tenants such as Prairie Oil and Gas Company and the Gulf Company. In the 1920's the building was sold to Bob Waggoner, an area oilman and was referred to as the Waggoner Building. Wichita National Bank purchased the building in 1946 and subsequent renovations occurred in 1948 followed by a 1952 (architect Jesse G. Dixon) one-story motor bank addition and in 1955 a second remodel modernized the ground floor exterior with new windows, entrances, signage and installation of square red granite paneling while expanding the interior banking space. In 1960, the bank merged with First National Bank, becoming the largest bank in Wichita Falls. It was at this time that a well-known Texas architect, George Dahl, was hired to completely remodel the exterior and interior of the building. Ms. Gagne stated that it was during this era when the building exterior was clad in the iconic shades of blue porcelain enamel steel panels and five floors were added to the original building. The one-story addition from 1952 was modified to accommodate the double height lobby. The air conditioning venting was placed between the original masonry exterior and steel panels. The red square granite was replaced with cream-colored granite at the first floor along the southwest and southeast elevations. Large recessed storefront windows were also added. By 1966, architects Wood & Sibeck, designed an expansion for the parking garage and motor bank. The building was again renovated in 1980 and the storefronts replaced. It's believed the flat roof, metal-clad canopies with recessed lighting were likely added over the main entrances during the 1980s remodel. During this same time, a non-historic three-story addition constructed at 712 8th Street became part of the building complex. By 1993, the non-historic lettered signage for American National Bank was installed but later removed in 2018. Ms. Gagne advised the Commission, Post Oak Preservation Solutions, indicated the First Wichita National Bank(FWNB)building qualified for nomination underthe following criteria: PAGE 2 of 4 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.f Landmark Commission 3 April 25,2023 Criteria A —Area of Commerce—role in supporting industrial, agricultural and commercial development post-war era. Ms. Gagne noted the building had an important role in expansion of commerce with the First Wichita National Bank's extensive renovation and being considered the largest bank in the community offering loans to businesses, rural communities and individuals throughout Wichita Falls and northwest Texas area. The second criteria: Criteria C—Area of Architecture;local-level significance. The building's period of significance is considered 1960-1973 with architectural classification being mid- century modern. Key architects included Jesse Dixon (Wichita Falls, Voelcker& Dixon) and renowned Texas architect George Dahl both designed large-scale remodels; Dahl in particular is credited with the use of blue pre-fabricated, porcelain enamel steel panels which created a sleek corporate modern appearance exemplifying the trend of modernizing early twentieth century commercial buildings to accommodate changes in business, design and technology post WWII to suit needs of tenants and customers. The use of architectural enamel tile quickly spread to Texas in the 1950s. Dahl's design introduced three-shades of blue porcelain enamel steel panels which provided depth and interest while celebrating the material's versatility and thus giving the structure the name Big Blue as it is currently known. Ms. Gagne stated staff recommended the Commission consider endorsing the application for 719 Scott Ave. for listing on the National Register of Historic Places based on the following key elements: 1. Important role the building played in the expansion of commerce (banking) post WWII in greater Wichita Falls and the north Texas region; 2. Unique architecture with the 1960's extensive exterior remodel to a mid-century modern design; and 3. Building maintains integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship and its significant period of remodel is at least 50-years old. Ms. Gagne advised if the Commission approved the nomination of 719 Scott Ave., staff would submit a recommendation letter on their behalf as required to the Texas Historical Commission prior to the State Board of Review deadline and noted a second letter from the Mayor would need to be sent as well as part of the City's CLG responsibilities. Chairwoman Derr asked if there were any comments from the public, and then the Commission. Mr. Andy Lee briefly spoke on the architect, George Dahl, his projects and his professional reputation. Mr. Martin asked if approved, would the structure be removed from the tax roll, Ms. Graham advised it would not. Ms. Marcela Medellin asked if the entire structure was to be nominated. Ms. Gagne advised the addition was not recognized as it was constructed in the 1980's, however, the final determination would come from the State. With no further comment, Mr. Martin made a motion to approve their recommendation for 719 Scott Ave to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places and notice sent to the State Board of Review (THC). Mr. Lee seconded the motion. The motion passed with a vote of 8-0. IV. Discussion Item: National Preservation Month Activities: • Historic Marker Refurbishment Training — April 281", 2023,11 a.m. (Kell House Heritage Center) • Proclamation—City Council, May 2nd, 2023, 8:30 a.m. PAGE 3 of 4 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.f Landmark Commission 4 April 25,2023 • Wichita Falls Historic Resource survey— Digitization/Web Access Project V. Other Business: a) Monthly Reports Depot Square: Ms. Derr gave the following updates: • May 4th —Art Walk • Farmers Market open Saturdays • Farmers Market- 8th&Austin—Summer hours starting May, open Tues. &Thurs. West Floral Heights: Ms. Smith stated the West Floral Heights Historic District Volunteer Design Review Committee had been revitalized and would be holding a training Thursday, April 27th 2023. b) Updates: • NAPC —CAMP Workshop Ft. Worth—April 15—Overview • Training -West Floral Heights Volunteer Design Review Committee—April 27 • North Central Texas Regional Preservation Summit — Preservation TX: May 11 (Mineral Wells) c) Articles/Periodicals/Trainings: • THC —The Medallion—Winter 2023; feature issue on TX Courthouse Program d) Design Review—Staff Authorized — Minor Alteration/Repairs: • 1501 Grant- WFHHD —emergency gas line repair • 1315 Grant—WFHHD— replacement composition roof • 1300 Tilden WFHHD replacement tile roof(Landmark authorized) • 1509 Tilden -WFHHD— replacement composition roof • 1404 Buchanan WFHHD in-ground pool • 701 Ohio—Depot Square HD replacement TPO roof; no parapet changes VI. Adjourn Next regularly scheduled meeting May 23, 2023— 12 p.m. Meeting adjourned at 12:34 p.m. iUcWb — MiUitlt DCI1, Cilicii mson Date PAGE 4 of 4 AGENDA ITEM NO.5.f CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 06, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the HIV Prevention Grant Program in the amount of $138,272 received from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same. INITIATING DEPT: Health STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance COMMENTARY: The Department of State Health Services (DSHS) is amending the current HIV Prevention Grant Program contract to add $138,272 of funding for Fiscal Year 2024. There is no match requirement. An HIV Prevention Program Manager and Certified Medical Assistant (CMA) are covered by this grant. The primary job duties of the program staff are to ensure programmatic and financial requirements set forth by DSHS are met. Programmatic activities include HIV and syphilis outreach, education, testing, and referral for residents in an 11 county area. The contract period for this grant is September 01, 2023, to August 31, 2024. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. ® Director of Health ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.A Ordinance No. Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the HIV Prevention Grant Program in the amount of $138,272 received from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same WHEREAS, the Health District and the Department of State Health Services desire to enter into a contract for continued public health services; and, WHEREAS, the approval of these funds could not have been anticipated prior to the adoption of the 2022 —2023 budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: There is hereby appropriated in the Special Revenue Fund $138,272 for the HIV Prevention Grant Program, and the City Manager is authorized to enter into a contract with the Department of State Health Services for the Wichita Falls-Wichita County Public Health District. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.A CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 06, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Grant Program in the amount of $190,383.17 received from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC), and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same. INITIATING DEPT: Health STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance COMMENTARY: The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) has provided the local Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program of the Health Department additional funding in the amount of$190,383.17. This amount is based on the number of participants seen in the local WIC clinic, and also funds services such as outreach and education regarding breastfeeding and nutrition. This increase in funding will bring the total Health Department WIC contract with HHSC to $1,109,646.00 for Fiscal Year 2023. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. ® Director of Health ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.B Ordinance No. Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Grant Program in the amount of $190,383.17 received from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC), and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same WHEREAS, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission has identified additional funding for our local WIC agency; and, WHEREAS, the approval of these funds could not have been anticipated prior to the adoption of the 2022 —2023 budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: There is hereby appropriated in the Special Revenue Fund $190,383.17 for the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.B CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 06, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the Texas Epidemiology Capacity Expansion Grant Program in the amount of $166,936 received from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same. INITIATING DEPT: Health STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance COMMENTARY: The grant agreement is with the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) for the Texas Epidemiology Capacity Expansion Grant Program. The Health Department has been a recipient of this type of funding since 2015. The contract term is September 01, 2023, to August 31, 2025, in the amount of $166,936. This is no match requirement. The grant provides salary and fringe funding to support a Lead Epidemiologist, who is responsible for conducting surveillance and epidemiology activities for all notifiable conditions with an emphasis on certain conditions reported through the Texas National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS). Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. ® Director of Health ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.0 Ordinance No. Ordinance making an appropriation to the Special Revenue Fund for the Texas Epidemiology Capacity Expansion Grant Program in the amount of $166,936 received from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) and authorizing the City Manager to execute contract accepting same WHEREAS, the Health District and the Department of State Health Services desire to enter into a contract for continued public health services; and, WHEREAS, the approval of these funds could not have been anticipated prior to the adoption of the 2022 —2023 budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: There is hereby appropriated in the Special Revenue Fund $166,936 for the Texas Epidemiology Capacity Expansion Grant Program, and the City Manager is authorized to enter into a contract with the Department of State Health Services for the Wichita Falls- Wichita County Public Health District. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 102 of the Code of Ordinances by creating Article IX — Golf Cart, providing for severability, and setting an effective date. INITIATING DEPT: Police Department STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice effective governance COMMENTARY: Current State Law allows for the operation of golf carts on roadways; if only going to and from a golf course. There are many golf carts being operated throughout neighborhoods in the City for personal use in violation of the state statute. Approval of this proposed local ordinance would allow our citizens the use of golf carts on roadways without the "to and from golf course" requirement and bring the operators in compliance with the law and allow our citizens a quality of life enjoyment. This can be done safely if all the mandated golf cart regulations put in place in this ordinance are followed and enforced. The PD and media could educate our citizens on proper operation and requirements of driving a golf cart on public roadways. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. ® Chief, Police Department ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 6 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.D Ordinance No. Ordinance amending Chapter 102 of the Code of Ordinances by creating Article IX — Golf Carts, providing for severability, and setting an effective date WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls is a home-rule municipality acting under its Charter pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls City Council has reviewed and has determined it is desirable to regulate the operation of golf carts on public streets to ensure public safety; and, WHEREAS, Texas Transportation Code Section 551.4031 authorizes the governing body of a municipality to regulate and control the operation of golf carts within the City's legal boundaries and on its public streets to ensure the public safety of the community; and, WHEREAS, golf cart use can help to reduce overall emissions, and their use is an eco-friendly or 'green' alternative to traditional passenger vehicles; and, WHEREAS, golf carts are not normally equipped with many of the traditional safety features that are customarily required or found on more commonly-used motor vehicles; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to regulate golf carts in order to preserve health, property, good government, and order in a Home-Rule municipality as defined under Chapter 54 of Texas Local Government Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this Ordinance by reference as findings of fact as if expressly set forth herein. Section 2. Amendment. Chapter 102, Article IX is hereby created and shall read as follows: PAGE 2 OF 6 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.D ARTICLE IX. — GOLF CARTS Sec. 102-270. - Definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Golf cart. The meaning assigned by the Texas Transportation Code section 541 .001, as it exists or may be amended, includes a motor vehicle designed by the manufacturer primarily for transporting persons on a golf course. The term, as used herein, shall include a specific restriction that a permitted golf cart shall have an attainable top speed of not greater than 25 mph. Specifically excluded from this definition are those motorized conveyances commonly referred to as ATVs, NEVs, UTVs, ROVs, or four-wheelers. Hours of Operation. The period begins at 7 a.m. and ends at 9 p.m. Operator. A person who drives or has physical control of a golf cart. An operator shall carry a valid Texas driver's license or a valid learner permit while accompanied by an adult 18 years or older who holds and carries a valid Texas driver's license. Owner. The person who has legal title to the golf cart has the legal right of possession of the golf cart or has the legal right of control of it. Public street. The public roadways of the City by whatever name, e.g., road, alley, avenue, highway, route, boulevard, etc., within the corporate boundaries of Wichita Falls that: (1) Has a posted speed limit of thirty-five (35) miles per hour or less; and (2) Provides for no more than one (1) lane of vehicular traffic per direction. Slow-moving-vehicle-emblem. A triangular emblem that conforms to standards and specifications adopted by the Director of the Texas Department of Transportation under Section 547.104 of the Texas Transportation Code, as amended, and is displayed in accordance with Section 547.703 of the Texas Transportation Code, as amended. Sec. 102-271. — Operation regulations for golf carts. (a) All operators of golf carts shall be licensed to operate a motor vehicle as provided by the Texas Transportation Code and shall carry a valid Texas driver's license while operating the golf cart. A license shall include a valid Texas learner license while accompanied by an adult 18 years or older who holds and carries a valid Texas driver's license. (b) All operators of golf carts shall abide by all traffic regulations applicable to vehicular traffic when using any public street in the City. Operators shall not PAGE 3 OF 6 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.D operate a golf cart on public sidewalks or any portion of the Circle Trail at any time. (c) Operators shall not operate golf carts on a public street with a posted speed limit of more than 35 mph. Operators shall not operate a golf cart at a speed greater than the posted speed at any time. (d) An operator of a golf cart is entitled to full use of a lane on the public street, and the operator of another motor vehicle shall not be operated in such a manner as to deprive any golf cart of the full use of a lane. (e) An operator of a golf cart shall not overtake and pass in the same lane occupied by the vehicle being overtaken. (f) No operator shall operate a golf cart between lanes of traffic or between adjacent lines of rows of vehicles. (g) An operator of a golf cart shall move to the right and yield the right of way to faster-moving vehicles. (h) The operator of a golf cart shall not operate a golf cart on a public street with more occupants than seating capacity as designed by the manufacturer, and all occupants shall remain seated in a seat designed to hold passengers while the golf cart is in motion. (i) The operator of a golf cart shall only operate a golf cart during the hours of operation. (j) A person, owner, or operator of a golf cart commits an offense if they operate a golf cart on a public street in violation of this section. Sec. 102-272. — Exceptions (a) Golf carts owned or operated for official government purposes by the City of Wichita Falls or any other governmental entity are exempt from regulation by this Code. (b) Golf carts owned and operated for holiday parcel delivery as authorized by city ordinance 94-17 are exempt from regulation by this Code article. Sec. 102-273. — Required equipment regulations (a) Every golf cart operated within the City of Wichita Falls shall be equipped with the following equipment, which shall be operational at all times: headlight, two tail lamps, parking brakes, rearview mirror(s), and a slow-moving vehicle emblem PAGE 4 OF 6 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.D clearly visible in daylight or at night from the light of standard automobile headlamps at a distance of at least 500 feet. (b) Every golf cart powered by gasoline shall at all times be equipped with an exhaust system in good working order and all golf carts shall comply with all state, federal, and city regulations, specifically Section 46-19, Unnecessary and disturbing noise or vibration. (c) Golf carts operating on a public street shall have an affixed state license plate for golf carts. (d) An operator of a golf cart commits an offense if they operate a golf cart on a public street that is not equipped as required by this section or is altered in violation of this section. (e) The owner of a golf cart commits an offense if they allow their golf cart to be operated in violation of this section. Sec. 102-274. — Criminal offense and penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this article, as it exists or may be amended, shall be deemed guilty of a Class C misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be guilty of a violation as provided in section 1-14. Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, that the provisions of this Ordinance shall become a part of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, and that sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such intention. Section 5. Should any word, phrase, paragraph, section, or portion of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective July 7, 2023. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR PAGE 5 OF 6 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.D ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 6 OF 6 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.D CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance canceling the regularly scheduled Council meeting on July 4, 2023. INITIATING DEPT: Legal STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice effective governance COMMENTARY: The first regularly scheduled City Council meeting in July 2023 falls on Independence Day, a national holiday. The attached ordinance will cancel that meeting. ® City Attorney ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.E Ordinance No. Ordinance canceling the regularly scheduled Council meeting on July 4, 2023 WHEREAS, the first regularly scheduled Council meeting of July 2023, falls on July 4; and, WHEREAS, July 4 is Independence Day, a national holiday observed by the City of Wichita Falls; and, WHEREAS, it is efficient and proper to cancel the meeting regularly scheduled for such date. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: The regularly scheduled City Council meeting on July 4, 2023, is hereby canceled. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.6.E CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the removal and replacement purchase of one (1) 17.5 ton and one (1) 20 ton rooftop unit located on the MPEC's Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall through the TIPS Purchasing Cooperative from Trinity Air Conditioning in the amount of $53,544. INITIATING DEPT: Multi-Purpose Events Center STRATEGIC GOAL: Redevelop Downtown STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Grow Hotel Occupancy Tax revenues to support the MPEC COMMENTARY: Two rooftop units located on the Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall of the MPEC have quit working and need replacement. The units are original to the building, so approximately 27 years old. These two units provide heat and air conditioning for the north side hallway inside the Exhibit Hall. Texas Local Government Local Government Code §252.022 exempts items purchased through interlocal cooperative purchasing contracts from the State's competitive bidding requirements. This chapter does not apply to expenditure for. . . (12) personal property sold. . under an interlocal contract for cooperative purchasing administered by a regional planning commission established under Chapter 391. Funding for this will come from the maintenance line item of the current MPEC budget. Staff recommends moving forward with Trinity Air Conditioning for this project. ® Director of MPEC ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.A LEIVAIV/3/4_,D .RCHEkcl1'YI.vio. AI ,:'P•1�^Yl..lf:_?i "4`,I: ;; 01S°8=i�i"4i WI[:F•IITA FA,.L::•3. i k45 Take 1rAmww• t:ni F',1Js{ L1i r -1z-1 IMIPEC 1600 5"Street. Wick. Falls T+,xal t ua, oaa Axt1 JRFcw TNPSrb 211001 tTTU H 5 Remove existing IT.5 tan Jona and nai I navo Taze&173 ton Gas rooilec unit wroth hail Guards and manual outside alr Intludes all tabor,Arrxtefials,rrand Tie anhnierizitingictertrical, gas piping land rOnstdill roartrals $25,357.00 9TIJ09&RTu024 4u n-vvr nxist•ng 1 F 5 1 nr r 2 j tan unit and•ntrail Qk new T(a+Ie 20 van leas rod rl.up unit' witF,r alP wardd and i lia u11 outside air IncludEsall'later materials eras lleei:,1nrxittiang41 hi dl, gas piping and noi,r.I I rnntarals $5.1.1- is C Trinity'Air Conditioning bpi;Rnbirllon ICFM!� O'WIE L.F61 FNIr 10*DM H%A&41Jr.+m r`wMr.uu!ll,nMln.•mvm•• .1,m or-alw'•°..1,:._,s•.'•..A i fa-ri, sc.p PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.A Resolution No. Resolution authorizing the removal and replacement purchase of one (1) 17.5 ton and one (1) 20 ton rooftop unit located on the MPEC's Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall through the TIPS Purchasing Cooperative from Trinity Air Conditioning in the amount of $53,544 WHEREAS, the current AC units on the MPEC's Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall are in excess of 25 years old; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to have the new AC units removed and replaced prior to the high temperatures of summer; and, WHEREAS, Texas Local Government Code §252.022 exempts items purchased through interlocal cooperative purchasing contracts from the State's competitive bidding requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wichita Falls has passed a resolution approving the participation in such cooperative agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: City staff is authorized to purchase the removal and replacement of one (1) 17.5- ton and one (1) 20-ton rooftop unit located on the MPEC's Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall through the TIPS Purchasing Cooperative in the amount of $53,544 from Trinity Air Conditioning, Inc. and the City Manager is authorized to execute a contract for the City with Trinity Air Conditioning, Inc. for the completion of such project in a form as approved by the City Attorney. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.A CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the award of bid for the City's estimated annual requirement of Curb & Gutter ready mix and Class A to Diamond M Concrete in the amount of $101,000.00; Class S and Flowable Fill to Blue Quill Trucking, LLC dba Falls Redimix, LLC in the amount of $423,850.00; and Class C-C ready mix to OK Concrete Company in the amount of $64,500.00. INITIATING DEPT: Public Works STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: N/A COMMENTARY: Bids were opened on May 23, 2023, for the purchase of the City's estimated annual requirement of ready-mix concrete and flowable fill. The primary user is the Street Division; however, other City departments will also have requirements throughout the year. Bids are requested by line item for five (5) different types of concrete mix, allowing bidders to bid all or specific items depending on their ability to provide the product. Three (3) responses were received (bid tabulation attached). This year's bids have increased in cost from 7 to 29% per unit. Staff recommends award of bid for the city's estimated annual requirement of Curb & Gutter ready mix and Class A to Diamond M Concrete in the amount of $101,000.00; Class S and Flowable Fill to Falls Redimix, LLC in the amount of$423,850.00; and Class C-C ready mix to OK Concrete in the amount of $64,500.00. Product is ordered by various departments on an as-needed basis. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. ® Director, Public Works ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution , Bid Tab ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.B Resolution No. Resolution authorizing the award of bid for the City's estimated annual requirement of Curb & Gutter ready mix and Class A to Diamond M Concrete in the amount of $101,000.00; Class S and Flowable Fill to Blue Quill Trucking, LLC dba Falls Redimix, LLC in the amount of $423,850.00; and Class C-C ready mix to OK Concrete Company in the amount of$64,500.00 WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls advertised and requested bids for the City's estimated annual requirement of ready mix concrete and flowable fill; and, WHEREAS, bids were received and publicly opened on May 23, 2023; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to purchase ready mix concrete and flowable fill for use by various city departments during the next twelve-month period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Authorization is granted to award the bid for the city's estimated annual requirement of Curb & Gutter ready mix and Class A to Diamond M Concrete in the amount of $101,000.00; Class S and Flowable Fill to Blue Quill Trucking, LLC dba Falls Redimix, LLC in the amount of $423,850.00; and Class C-C ready mix to OK Concrete Company in the amount of$64,500.00. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.B cn m 8 a Q C Z Q K I m a O sd 2 N, M pN pN pr W L i_ w d d 0 Q M I- s 3 a Q w O I M Vii� a at. w s u J N .1 r 9 S 8 8 8 8 S v * $ g_4�. x § .F[ §Ed. a 8 [4a IL G Q a1 d 9 P , F trN M M N "a L N 5 i U aY ,,,J yr}p yi. 4 yu9 N Yr' y q q a GS a VJ Y a 4J yg W F m m Cg,,gO 4 C1 4J 4 J rCtl a z >.-0 4 Q p t J Z O LI �W. _2 2 a L ul m z 0 b r 4 G. 0 c� H 4 n gk R 4 - u? r. w o X o. za 8 B ° �S u - a en a • . eA 0 7. 1a 3 9.tg 9- CCi w N 2 N r il W U e. 4 u w p a ¢ 9 y r. m a N R a I- J U W f] O 0 S g -pi []J Q V N O pp d N L 3� pd > _g 8 4 2 .di a 4 p "�YR e 8 2 ; � q a ¢ .r N ER W IL, N ,u,_ a i 0 = M 2 g U + N L�ryry N 8 In N - Z U 7 ..I Y f1 ft. r N ti i n 7 l0 ¢N yy Y7 J Y y4 O 8 aO 8 e,N q 7 ry gU 4 uNx1 S S ..�, $ 7� r+ c a�q N en w en M w N N N N e 0 _ z a m w ax Ljx V, - �- I-- ac p G N %N w'n a a w U. u › ;c � � a •�- N u Ci�- r- n C e _ o� k3z CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Conduct a public hearing to receive citizen comments and take action on a resolution for the proposed 2023 Fourth Year Annual Action Plan of the adopted Five Year 2020-2024 Public Housing Agency (PHA) Plan. INITIATING DEPT: Development Services/Housing STRATEGIC GOAL: Accelerate Economic Growth STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Support Neighborhood Revitalization COMMENTARY: The City Council annually reviews and approves the documents that guide operations of the City's Housing Choice Voucher (formerly Section 8) Program, this being the 2023 Fourth Year Action Plan of the adopted 2020-2024 Five Year Public Housing Agency Plan. A public hearing is required for the approval of this plan. The Public Housing Agency Plan serves as a broad document outlining the programs the Housing Division intends to provide. Staff is not recommending any modifications to the Fourth Year of the Five-Year Action Plan. It has been customary during the annual review of the PHA plans to also review the status of the program. Below are a few current program details: • 870 families currently being assisted, with 67 vouchers issued searching for units • 528 individuals/families currently on the waiting list • $402 current average cost per unit, per month • $27 increase from last year due to the rising cost of rent per unit Staff recommends (1) the Council open the public hearing to receive citizen comments, and (2) the approval of the Resolution. ® Neighborhood Services Manager ® Director of Development Services ® Assistant City Manager ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution; PHA Fourth Year Action Plan of the adopted Five-Year PHA Plan ® Budget Office Review: ® City Attorney Review: ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 7 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.c Resolution No. Resolution approving the 2023 Fourth Year Annual Action Plan of the Adopted 2020-2024 Five Year Public Housing Agency (PHA) Plan WHEREAS, the Housing Division must annually submit for City Council approval, the Division's Annual Action Plan as part of the Five Year PHA Plan; WHEREAS, as a result of this year's review of the Fourth Year Annual Action Plan, city staff is recommending no modifications be made; WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the required Public Hearing for this action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: The attached Fourth Year Action Plan of the adopted Five Year Public Housing Agency Plan is hereby approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 2 OF 7 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.c Streamlined Annual U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB No.2577-0226 Office of Public and Indian Housing Expires 02/29/2016 PHA Plan (HCV Only PHAs) Purpose. The 5-Year and Annual PHA Plans provide a ready source for interested parties to locate basic PHA policies,rules,and requirements concerning the PHA's operations,programs,and services,and informs HUD,families served by the PHA,and members of the public of the PHA's mission,goals and objectives for serving the needs of low-income,very low-income,and extremely low- income families Applicability. Form HUD-50075-HCV is to be completed annually by HCV-Only PHAs. PHAs that meet the definition of a Standard PHA,Troubled PHA,High Performer PHA,Small PHA,or Qualified PHA do not need to submit this form. Where applicable,separate Annual PHA Plan forms are available for each of these types of PHAs. Definitions. 1) High-Performer PHA-A PHA that owns or manages more than 550 combined public housing units and housing choice vouchers,and was designated as a high performer on both of the most recent Public Housing Assessment System(PHAS)and Section Eight Management Assessment Program(SEMAP)assessments if administering both programs,or PHAS if only administering public housing. (2) Small PHA-A PHA that is not designated as PHAS or SEMAP troubled,or at risk of being designated as troubled,that owns or manages less than 250 public housing units and any number of vouchers where the total combined units exceeds 550. (3) Housing Choice Voucher(HC)Only PHA-A PHA that administers more than 550 HCVs,was not designated as troubled in its most recent SEMAP assessment,and does not own or manage public housing. (4) Standard PHA-A PHA that owns or manages 250 or more public housing units and any number of vouchers where the total combined units exceeds 550,and that was designated as a standard performer in the most recent PHAS and SEMAP assessments. (5) Troubled PHA-A PHA that achieves an overall PHAS or SEMAP score of less than 60 percent. (6) Qualified PHA-A PHA with 550 or fewer public housing dwelling units and/or housing choice vouchers combined,and is not PHAS or SEMAP troubled. A. PHA Information. A.1 PHA Name: City of Wichita Falls PHA Code:TX498 PHA Plan for Fiscal Year Beginning: (MM/YYYY): 10/2023 PHA Inventory(Based on Annual Contributions Contract(ACC)units at time of FY beginning,above) Number of Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) 997 PHA Plan Submission Type: ®Annual Submission ❑Revised Annual Submission Availability of Information. In addition to the items listed in this form,PHAs must have the elements listed below readily available to the public. A PHA must identify the specific location(s)where the proposed PHA Plan,PHA Plan Elements,and all information relevant to the public hearing and proposed PHA Plan are available for inspection by the public. Additionally,the PHA must provide information on how the public may reasonably obtain additional information of the PHA policies contained in the standard Annual Plan,but excluded from their streamlined submissions. At a minimum,PHAs must post PHA Plans,including updates,at the main office or central office of the PHA. PHAs are strongly encouraged to post complete PHA Plans on their official website. ❑PHA Consortia: (Check box if submitting a joint Plan and complete table below) Participating PHAs PHA Code Program(s)in the Consortia Program(s)not in the No.of Units in Each Program Consortia Lead HA: PAGE 3 OF 7 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.c B. Annual Plan. B.1 Revision of PHA Plan Elements. (a) Have the following PHA Plan elements been revised by the PHA since its last Annual Plan submission? Y N ❑ ® Housing Needs and Strategy for Addressing Housing Needs. ❑ ® Deconcentration and Other Policies that Govern Eligibility,Selection,and Admissions. ❑ ® Financial Resources. ❑ ® Rent Determination. ❑ ® Operation and Management. ❑ ® Informal Review and Hearing Procedures. ❑ ® Homeownership Programs. ❑ ® Self Sufficiency Programs and Treatment of Income Changes Resulting from Welfare Program Requirements. ❑ ® Substantial Deviation. ❑ ® Significant Amendment/Modification. (b) If the PHA answered yes for any element,describe the revisions for each element(s): B.2 New Activities (a) Does the PHA intend to undertake any new activities related to the following in the PHA's current Fiscal Year? Y N ❑ ® Project Based Vouchers. (b)If this activity is planned for the current Fiscal Year,describe the activities. Provide the projected number of project-based units and general locations,and describe how project-basing would be consistent with the PHA Plan. B.3 Most Recent Fiscal Year Audit. (a) Were there any findings in the most recent FY Audit? Y N N/A ❑ ® ❑ (b) If yes,please describe: B.4 Civil Rights Certification Form HUD-50077,PHA Certifications of Compliance with the PHA Plans and Related Regulations,must be submitted by the PHA as an electronic attachment to the PHA Plan. B.5 Certification by State or Local Officials. Form HUD 50077-SL,Certification by State or Local Officials of PHA Plans Consistency with the Consolidated Plan,must be submitted by the PHA as an electronic attachment to the PHA Plan. PAGE 4 OF 7 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.c B.6 Progress Report. Provide a description of the PHA's progress in meeting its Mission and Goals described in its 5-Year PHA Plan. The PHA continues to work towards improving housing lease-up rates and maintain the maximum number of families under lease that the budget limits will support.2.To provide outreach to property owners to increase housing stock outside of the poverty areas.3.To provide a comprehensive analysis of the rental market,which will allow the highest payment standards that the funding limits will support without reducing the number of participating families.4.To promote self-sufficiency and asset development by our tenants and the community. 5. Improve SEMAP score. 6. Increase customer and landlord satisfaction. Maintain or increase lease-up by establishing payment standards that will enable families to rent throughout the jurisdiction.Undertake affirmative measures to ensure access to assisted housing regardless of race,color,religion,national origin,sex,familial status,and disability.Undertake affirmative measures to ensure access to assisted housing regardless of gender(LGBT)related to the equal access rule. Continue to protect clients and family members of clients who are victims of domestic,dating violence,or stalking from being terminated from housing based in acts such violence against them in accordance with the VAWA act. B.7 Resident Advisory Board(RAB)Comments. (a) Did the RAB(s)provide comments to the PHA Plan? Y N (a) If yes,comments must be submitted by the PHA as an attachment to the PHA Plan. PHAs must also include a narrative describing their analysis of the RAB recommendations and the decisions made on these recommendations. Instructions for Preparation of Form HUD-50075-HCV Annual PHA Plan for HCV Only PHAs A. PHA Information.All PHAs must complete this section. (24 CFR§903.23(4)(e)) A.1 Include the full PHA Name,PHA Code,PHA Type,PHA Fiscal Year Beginning(MM/YYYY),Number of Housing Choice Vouchers(HCVs),PHA Plan Submission Type,and the Availability of Information,specific location(s)of all information relevant to the public hearing and proposed PHA Plan. PHA Consortia:Check box if submitting a Joint PHA Plan and complete the table. (24 CFR§943.128(a)) B. Annual Plan. All PHAs must complete this section.(24 CFR§903.11(c)(3)) B.1 Revision of PHA Plan Elements.PHAs must: Identify specifically which plan elements listed below that have been revised by the PHA.To specify which elements have been revised,mark the"yes"box.If an element has not been revised,mark"no." ❑ Housing Needs and Strategy for Addressing Housing Needs. Provide a statement addressing the housing needs of low-income, very low-income families who reside in the PHA's jurisdiction and other families who are on the Section 8 tenant-based waiting list. The statement must identify the housing needs of(i)families with incomes below 30 percent of area median income(extremely low- income), (ii)elderly families and families with disabilities,and(iii)households of various races and ethnic groups residing in the jurisdiction or on the waiting list based on information provided by the applicable Consolidated Plan,information provided by HUD, and other generally available data. The identification of housing needs must address issues of affordability,supply,quality, accessibility,size of units,and location. (24 CFR§903.7(a)(1) and 24 CFR§903.7(a)(2)(i)). Provide a description of the PHA's strategy for addressing the housing needs of families in the jurisdiction and on the waiting list in the upcoming year.24 CFR §903.7(a)(2)(ii) ❑ Deconcentration and Other Policies that Govern Eligibility,Selection,and Admissions. A statement of the PHA's policies that govern resident or tenant eligibility,selection and admission including admission preferences for HCV. (24 CFR§903.7(b)) ❑ Financial Resources. A statement of financial resources,including a listing by general categories,of the PHA's anticipated resources,such as PHA HCV funding and other anticipated Federal resources available to the PHA,as well as tenant rents and other PAGE 5 OF 7 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.c income available to support tenant-based assistance. The statement also should include the non-Federal sources of funds supporting each Federal program,and state the planned use for the resources. (24 CFR§903.7(c)) ❑ Rent Determination. A statement of the policies of the PHA governing rental contributions of families receiving tenant-based assistance,discretionary minimum tenant rents,and payment standard policies.(24 CFR§903.7(d)) ❑ Operation and Management. A statement that includes a description of PHA management organization,and a listing of the programs administered by the PHA. (24 CFR§903.7(e)(3)(4)). ❑ Informal Review and Hearing Procedures. A description of the informal hearing and review procedures that the PHA makes available to its applicants. (24 CFR§903.7(f)) ❑ Homeownership Programs. A statement describing any homeownership programs(including project number and unit count) administered by the agency under section 8y of the 1937 Act,or for which the PHA has applied or will apply for approval. (24 CFR §903.7(k)) ❑ Self Sufficiency Programs and Treatment of Income Changes Resulting from Welfare Program Requirements. A description of any PHA programs relating to services and amenities coordinated,promoted,or provided by the PHA for assisted families,including those resulting from the PHA's partnership with other entities,for the enhancement of the economic and social self-sufficiency of assisted families,including programs provided or offered as a result of the PHA's partnerships with other entities, and activities under section 3 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1968 and under requirements for the Family Self- Sufficiency Program and others. Include the program's size(including required and actual size of the FSS program)and means of allocating assistance to households. (24 CFR§903.7(1)(i)) Describe how the PHA will comply with the requirements of section 12(c) and(d)of the 1937 Act that relate to treatment of income changes resulting from welfare program requirements. (24 CFR §903.7(1)(iii)). ❑ Substantial Deviation. PHA must provide its criteria for determining a"substantial deviation"to its 5-Year Plan. (24 CFR §903.7(r)(2)(i)) ❑ Significant Amendment/Modification. PHA must provide its criteria for determining a"Significant Amendment or Modification"to its 5-Year and Annual Plan. Should the PHA fail to define`significant amendment/modification',HUD will consider the following to be`significant amendments or modifications': a)changes to rent or admissions policies or organization of the waiting list;orb)any change with regard to homeownership programs. See guidance on HUD's website at:Notice PIH 1999-51. (24 CFR§903.7(r)(2)(ii)) If any boxes are marked"yes",describe the revision(s)to those element(s)in the space provided. B.2 New Activity. If the PHA intends to undertake new activity using Housing Choice Vouchers(HCVs)for new Project-Based Vouchers(PBVs)in the current Fiscal Year,mark"yes"for this element,and describe the activities to be undertaken in the space provided. If the PHA does not plan to undertake this activity,mark"no." (24 CFR§983.57(b)(1)and Section 8(13)(C)of the United States Housing Act of 1937. ❑ Project-Based Vouchers(PBV). Describe any plans to use HCVs for new project-based vouchers.If using PBVs,provide the projected number of project-based units and general locations,and describe how project-basing would be consistent with the PHA Plan. B.3 Most Recent Fiscal Year Audit. If the results of the most recent fiscal year audit for the PHA included any findings,mark"yes"and describe those findings in the space provided. (24 CFR§903.11(c)(3),24 CFR§903.7(p)) B.4 Civil Rights Certification. Form HUD-50077,PHA Certifications of Compliance with the PHA Plans and Related Regulation,must be submitted by the PHA as an electronic attachment to the PHA Plan. This includes all certifications relating to Civil Rights and related regulations. A PHA will be considered in compliance with the AFFH Certification if:it can document that it examines its programs and proposed programs to identify any impediments to fair housing choice within those programs;addresses those impediments in a reasonable fashion in view of the resources available;works with the local jurisdiction to implement any of the jurisdiction's initiatives to affirmatively further fair housing;and assures that the annual plan is consistent with any applicable Consolidated Plan for its jurisdiction.(24 CFR§903.7(o)) B.5 Certification by State or Local Officials. Form HUD-50077-SL,Certification by State or Local Officials of PHA Plans Consistency with the Consolidated Plan,including the manner in which the applicable plan contents are consistent with the Consolidated Plans, must be submitted by the PHA as an electronic attachment to the PHA Plan. (24 CFR§903.15) B.6 Progress Report. For all Annual Plans following submission of the first Annual Plan,a PHA must include a brief statement of the PHA's progress in meeting the mission and goals described in the 5-Year PHA Plan. (24 CFR§903.11(c)(3),24 CFR§903.7(r)(1)) B.7 Resident Advisory Board(RAB)comments.If the RAB provided comments to the annual plan,mark"yes,"submit the comments as an attachment to the Plan and describe the analysis of the comments and the PHA's decision made on these recommendations. 24 CFR§903.13(c),24 CFR§903.19) This information collection is authorized by Section 511 of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act,which added a new section 5A to the U.S. Housing Act of 1937,as amended,which introduced the Annual PHA Plan. The Annual PHA Plan provides a ready source for interested parties to PAGE 6 OF 7 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.c locate basic PHA policies,rules,and requirements concerning the PHA's operations,programs,and services,and informs HUD,families served by the PHA,and members of the public for serving the needs of low-income,very low-income,and extremely low-income families. Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 4.5 hour per response,including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection of information. HUD may not collect this information,and respondents are not required to complete this form,unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. Privacy Act Notice. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development is authorized to solicit the information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12,U.S.Code,Section 1701 et seq.,and regulations promulgated thereunder at Title 12,Code of Federal Regulations. Responses to the collection of information are required to obtain a benefit or to retain a benefit. The information requested does not lend itself to confidentiality PAGE 7 OF 7 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.c CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the New Restroom and Cart Barn Canopy/Pavilion addition at Champions Course at Weeks Park to Cage Construction and Management Co. dba Gary Baker Construction, in the amount of $412,792.00. INITIATING DEPT: Parks STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance COMMENTARY: On May 10, 2023, bids were opened for the New Restroom and Cart Barn Canopy/Pavilion Project at Champions Course at Weeks Park. The 2023 budget included $311,000 of one-time expenditures from General Fund balance and $288,143 from the Golf Course operation for Capital Improvements at the golf course. Three Capital Improvement projects were identified, including a new restroom accessible from outside at the clubhouse, a cart barn canopy/pavilion to facilitate large outdoor gatherings and tournaments, and lighting for the driving range. The restroom and canopy/pavilion were identified as the first priority. This contract will complete the first two improvements. Five (5) bids were received for this project (bid tabulation attached). Staff recommends award of the contract to Cage Construction and Management Co. dba Gary Baker Construction, in the amount of $412,792.00 ® Assistant City Manager ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7D 0) O W N. O • a z co LL W O H N 0 W z CD W W W...1 O O O €wN p d Q o aCD o o U 07 Z 0 0- ww 2 › 1— H ct0 0 0 0 o o rLc) o L I W o-s o r- LLi rw F CL z rn I- d "' 0 o 0 o (N o < 0 g p� o 0 0 c o 0 0 0 N- D W �- 1.e' ��+y�/y - -t u t u hl d i W .-f N- co r 4 CO 1— EU Cf} 0 H W U 0 W - Q 7 I z I 0 0 re Ct ej F = I— 1— z ) I- z J 'C nup z w < CFJ i_ Cr.. CFI 0 CC, J z J J , J C J CC (NJu_ LL '.j' u u_ '< LL 0Ci 0 1- Zr 1- {o 1- 0:1 I- eL r I- co z w = _ )- = ix _ 1— o 0 ) C [_,3 CC r} Fr- r 3 Resolution No. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the New Restroom and Cart Barn Canopy/Pavilion Additions at Champions Course at Weeks Park to Cage Construction and Management Co. dba Gary Baker Construction, in the amount of $412,792.00 WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls has advertised for bids for the New Restroom and Cart Barn Canopy Additions at Champions Course at Weeks Park; and, WHEREAS, the renovation of this area will create an outdoor restroom facility and a canopy/pavilion to accommodate outdoor events and tournaments; and, WHEREAS, it is found that the lowest responsible bidder is Cage Construction and Management Co. dba Gary Baker Construction, in the amount of $412,792.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: Authorization is granted to award the bid for the New Restroom and Cart Barn Canopy Additions at Champions Course at Weeks Park to Cage Construction and Management Co. dba Gary Baker Construction, in the amount of $412,792.00. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7D CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to submit payment to ServiceMaster of Wichita Falls for water removal and dehumidification of the Wichita Falls — Wichita County Public Health District in the amount of $390,749. INITIATING DEPT: Information Technologies & Facilities STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance COMMENTARY: During the early morning hours of December 25, 2022, a water supply line in the boiler room of the Wichita Falls —Wichita County Public Health District building burst and flooded the facility. The City staff was made aware of the flood at about 5:00 am that morning. Upon arrival, the City Staff contacted the Water Dept to have the water turned off in the building, began pumping about 4 feet of water from the boiler room, and began to assess the building. Once it was discovered that most of the original portion of the facility had experienced flooding, City Staff contacted ServiceMaster of Wichita Falls to provide water removal and the dehumidification process. ServiceMaster arrived mid-morning on December 25, 2022, and began the water removal and installation of their dehumidification equipment. The attached invoice includes labor, supplies, and ServiceMaster's subcontractor's costs. They were onsite at varying times and degrees from December 25, 2022, to approximately February 7, 2023. A claim was filed on our catastrophic insurance policy with the Texas Municipal League. TML combined the water damage for the Health Department and the Exhibit Hall into a single claim. TML has accepted the claim and the policy has a $250,000 deductible. TML will be reimbursing the City for all bills associated with the flood excluding the deductible. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign all documents necessary to submit payment to ServiceMaster of Wichita Falls for water removal and dehumidification of the Wichita Falls—Wichita County Public Health District in the amount of $390,749. ® Assistant City Manager ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.E Resolution No. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to submit payment to ServiceMaster of Wichita Falls for water removal and dehumidification of the Wichita Falls — Wichita County Public Health District in the amount of$390,749 WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls experienced unexpected water line ruptures at both the Multipurpose Event Center (MPEC) and the Health Department facilities on or around December 23, 2022; and WHEREAS, these conditions caused water damage at the MPEC and Health Department Facilities. WHEREAS, because of these issues, the City of Wichita Falls has determined an emergency exists as water severely damaged municipal facilities creating an unforeseen grave public necessity; and, WHEREAS, the City will pay the invoice of $390,749 out of General Fund Reserves; and, WHEREAS, the Texas Municipal League will reimburse the City for any amount above the $250,000 deductible for the water damage claim at both facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: The City Manager is authorized to execute all documents necessary to submit payment to ServiceMaster of Wichita Falls for water removal and dehumidification of the Wichita Falls—Wichita County Public Health District in the amount of $390,749 PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.E CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6, 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution approving the programs and expenditures of the Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation (WFEDC/4A) by amending the budget to include an up to $76,000 expenditure to the City of Wichita Falls to be used as 10% matching funds to update the Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan. INITIATING DEPT: City Manager's Office STRATEGIC GOAL: Accelerate Economic Growth STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Encourage...Recruitment of High Value Businesses COMMENTARY: Pursuant to Texas Local Government Code §501.073(a) "The corporation's authorizing unit (i.e. City Council) will approve all programs and expenditures of a corporation and annually review any financial statements of the corporation." Timeline • May 18, 2023 — WFEDC Board hears presentation from City of Wichita Falls and approves request; • June 6, 2023 — City Council to consider ratifying budget amendment to support project. Summary This item is to consider approval of an amendment to the WFEDC's (4A) budget to include an up to a $76,000 expenditure to facilitate an update to the Regional Airport Master Plan. The funds requested would be used as a 10% match towards the overall $760,000 cost with the remaining 90% being paid for through Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) funds. On May 18, 2023, the WFEDC considered and approved this item. The City's Director of Aviation, Traffic, and Transportation will be at the Council meeting to give a presentation and answer any questions related to the project. The WFEDC's May 2023 Financial Report shows the corporation has approximately $10.0M in available funds to facilitate this project. The WFEDC Board and City staff recommends approval of this resolution. ® Assistant City Manager ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Exhibits from WFEDC meeting, Resolution PAGE 1 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F ® Budget Office Review ® City Attorney Review ® City Manager Approval PAGE 2 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Resolution No. Resolution approving the programs and expenditures of the Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation (WFEDC) and amending the budget to include an up to $76,000 expenditure to the City of Wichita Falls to be used as 10% matching funds to update the Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan WHEREAS, Texas Local Gov't. Code §501.073(a) provides "The corporation's authorizing unit will approve all programs and expenditures of a corporation and annually review any financial statements of the corporation"; and, WHEREAS, on May 18, 2023, the WFEDC approved the Project listed below and as stated in its agenda. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation's approval and funding of the following programs and expenditures as described below and in said corporation's agenda, are approved: Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan Update: • A total of up to an up to $76,000 expenditure to the City of Wichita Falls to be used as 10% matching funds to update the Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan. 2. The current fiscal year budget of the WFEDC is amended to provide for the aforementioned expenditures and changes thereto. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of June 2023. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk PAGE 3 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation May 2023 ITEM/SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action on a request by the City of Wichita Falls related to a master plan update at Wichita Falls Regional Airport ATTACHMENTS: Staff Summary: The City of Wichita Falls has been working with the Wichita Falls Chamber of Commerce to explore the development of a future aviation business park at Wichita Falls Regional Airport. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) funding is available to update the Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan to include the evaluation of several locations for a proposed aviation business park. It has been 15 years since the current Master Plan for Regional Airport was developed, and there was no evaluation of a proposed aviation business park development in that plan. In order to use FAA funding for the development of such a project, a Master Plan update is requried, as well as the inclusion of the aviation business park in a formal Airport Layout Plan, as required by the FAA. Recent discussions with Sheppard Air Force Base have also indicated that a formal Master Plan update will be required if additional land is leased from the United States Air Force, as well as any proposed through-the-fence agreement, for the development of this project. In addition, an airspace analysis can be conducted to determine the impact of such a development on Sheppard's airspace and training mission. Finally, this project also supports the Chamber's strategic goal of attracting aviation related businesses. These businesses have a history of supporting higher paid jobs, which is also a goal of both the Chamber and 4A Economic Development Corporation. Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan Update Total Project Cost: $760,680.00 FAA Eligible Portion of Project (90%): $684,612.00 Local Match/4A Assistance (10%): $76,000.00 PAGE 4 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Eli i! . . • '4[ .§ - I ' -. a Ell 0 i ICIE 'mimic"- . • - ' . .:. ,_ 111111 lin i 1i1111111N1111111111111 - —ItI i,i' l ' 1M:' f 0 ,r1 • : ri 1111 ii n Nil: : I ' " i 1 •t• z -r ‘ \ , I . 1 I 11 4._..1„ ',..., , F, 1 6 MOS= , 111111.• ','..4 • 't ; I iii ' P ill riiiiallikaili it! , , \\ . v.,• . 1 ' 2. r .- 1"V511 ',., t '1 El ;if M....9. , ; 1; I. 17 lill 11111 III 111 I A . 'II k T \ 0 . l • , • , , . -, .... . ,. . *Sir , : _... • , 1 1 PAGE 5 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F CITY OF WICHITA FALLS,TEXAS AVIATION,TRAFFIC&TRANSPORTATION INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Ron Kitchens.CFO Wichita Falls Chamber of Commerce Darren Leiker,t'i[' Ma na;per Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager From: John Bunus,Director of Aviation,Traffic&Transportation Subject Potential Air Service Study for Wichita Falls Date: April 10,2023 Moriab contacted me this morning about the Master Pl.m Update for Regional Airport, and we also discussed a potential air service study for the Airport. Darrort asked that I provide you art update on the City's past efforts on airline recruitment. • Staff applied for and received a Small Community Air Service Grant using an Air Service Study completed by 2v1ead• IIttnt in.2008. Potential markets were identified as I-Iouston.Phoenix,and Denver • I.ebruarr, I 1, 2009 Airport and Chamber staff (Tim Chase)visited with Continental Airlines in I-louston,Texas. io The visit was receptive.bul Continental eras in its initial merger tt ith United Airlines oy Their hi ages(concern was that their costs to provide service to Houston put them at a competitive disadvtirttagc with American service to DFW fir cost incite for them to fly from Wichita Falls to I le.uston than it did American to fly from Wichita Falls to DFW) • In 2015,Airport stall attended a Small C.Ionimnnity Air Service Conference in Tucson. Notes from that conference are attached with this memo. i_.:pdaite:•s to those notes include' Airport staff and City leadership met with t-.nviry and American Airlines to discuss service improvements. Those service improvement henehnnnrks:ire.`:till In use tfid ly. ci American would not let the City of Wichita Falls hid on the ground handling e.tTiis as recommended in the 2015 attached memo • Sixel Consulting completed their 2015 air services report (attached)for the t' i s `'✓:c,+'•.i Falls o In a phone conversation with Sixel, City staff was informed that the likelihood of Wichita Falls getting another airline to service Wichita Fails was unlikely. • The biggest reasons for the unlikelihood or ohrairiirrg a second airline was Wichita Falls close proximity to DFW Airport and American Airlines dominance in the region. There was no interest from the Chamber to su1port a revenue rr,,:,it,t: prn:?rarn that could he used to recruit a second airline into the t_onrmtrrritt • Since COVID,airport staff is in regular e o ni tin iCaii:.T' ,:i:l' `jmerio:n id.rnners and decision makers about adding additional flighty. 'The most recent Vi:,i^, months ago. The change that came from that visit is that the East Ili lit ..ill :,i_r, r••.crr,i_trt, with the next departure first thing in the morning. This is scheduled I,. :•.I,.r: n'.ionic PAGE 6 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Exhibit E City of WIchN,Falb Alrporl Pl■nnin0 Projects Alopnrl Maab1 Plan Update 1604012130100240244126 0.4 et 02 Eei EJ N6- A w w w N N N 2 el I.RUMP -MIAMI 101 MIE41MTI0N.MDVA01 40 Tea I.1•AA.140-0Ihl•a•0 0I 1}-1rwaa.PryYGwmrr eers.•ena•rw■x TaY 1!-NY Y 412161Knen. A •0 Iea IA-4WEI1440m 2 • Teals-6 0 0h..l 4 Tea 1l-166wt26264rrl A.AAMdY•YT wi11*. 24 W PC 2 1•06601.6F.x®i11.PROKTWflA1WL2 IsTII•ICIL 001114O0I0k IT 0 ,M 4 • • 42 • s E MA l.rvnORVOP0pa1P0202o1a0 - Tea0.1-I l0wv..irw•06.l.. • 22 Ye*2.2-EV•RO Ca60M•-TwrM•i AP•IIn i1•.. 12 Tea22-F1•wl.p3IhwrFOw•w 1E I ea e 4 m r1A00 ■ 1 1=POP 1•AW1011ACIMTYfOK048TI M�m1xM E a 1>? 1 • • • a 1ea11-46•6621116.* 6•112•61M1141k460.0, t■ T•o22-Palw••RPMiNw.• I Tea 2.0-I41•1661w4F6661••aabr...ok N.4..II 10 IW14-A1awMw A0M1R Teass-1•AnMMnPww•114 1 a r TW:2d-Pn.,26111•04+1 4 r I WAG • PLaaPwr 2•1113.0•10112rtriir 62.044J0e4 44 0 - 42 0 I 0 4 • I.ILSM•N14-PAEl1IYPLE*tLM■NII _ 1.1 fi-f4261O44741S6R.•i•ary 0614ap••ea.212444,44wo a • assoTwn1W r• MS",rack, • W .OwJMiiMrdide F•dry R•PAarres I 4 21 r ......2-...PM D0S R•P.relI Wipe 44 a0 • 4000. a I M •P 122 1 I • • •0 4 14▪16E112-1.VIp 0401. 0N80. I0.MNROMRRiAL.ARAMS aY11-Pw•1*1S.TIO sr w•lanlme A4••w•u••••••• a 12 22 h•NC • t L AMM• -UM"I at.s•avar.•2ellow.lIAL a•1ufan S1 II 112 1 • • a •E516NT I•AMORT ALTT3AMA Iall SI-LI.d UrP4ao2 2 a lea a2-aadpe Alall•AI* 2 I2 Tea R2-TwnNRlii Aa•mrAw a lea a4-Ned,0wrd 641160.4620114 0.1•666s 2 0 Irh aS-A3 l.Sw2PIr iIC• iY• P 12 12 ' Iea/I-NM Aiwa* 4 4 2a IaM RI-P.•s.Ml haw[ 4 b 4 MM0 • 1 adiedeauramaarrrameonorma1 .11•o a1 • r I I 4 as r T.WAHEWI.*•.0M LAYOUT PLAN nIVIIOPMBo 14•M2.1-MP 0 I614461•4ISt atoll II a.t4-*Pw11.1w11sva-1 44 �•w 1 • c ' r Id1-2-MPw1 Y•rw•w Woe Prom Bear a.* _ III - Usk 1A-Patel CwrrN,.Poor xhr 14 IMA 03-I/./Ogee.e./M40'•.2I• M 1OP 70-T•4624••••1266100 00 f 1.7-0.41pe214M W❑••r0 M TW 1.4-EdIYA Pnpe•N lAp a 1.1r101•••la.MT f.1119P17wI UA10P1 AR 12•ntaP4lwr y1 0 All 0 I I • 0 •I2EII12lT1.44•011TCAPR74.I11412142111142P110024AYT■AVI0241.H.N 1NRI_lICd.IF.n4T 4 Ia.11.2-0.44n0n•NRI•.l New=•I a le T 111-10140146160.MI Pah&C 2 2 0 F1-VW*, w.•w.•a1e1. • 4 •_P11.5-1•raY•■•Iw.1RPw1 • Tam•I-Propel.arR•pen • 011 4 OAA0 2 a isnw.asw1.w..a1.11n.ww..L.w r • r • T re a I.11▪4YIM1•-AERORaa111CAL IHMYu -, la Any Apart • 2 ARAM: 2 • • a • • • • • 1•.ESE■NI 10•POEL O020aNT10NIE■Illr T.A101-PO41 OAR be. 2 0 I T44101-PYYRoma .. Tea I0S-24010066I01.0641 12 ' Tea164-tr4442.00WaWRM.4w.Pre 2 4 0211E 2 ^ _ moe•••v a•••aam•TI•Mee 1ww.WIw• 614 4111414146 II I • I I I • 0 Nra• 2r IN 114E lI 2 r r N• 2311TOTe••w2ntla: 12r.11W 2120020 La•aw•YI OaW wPii4Mw i1110ID [mem OY 1112.02 11.0 ..y• 0 AYW 1222002 Trr1Gi 211004.12 .1.1410TM.,ORFCTYON/A■On•IP■1a■•: 1I*16EA 21r10T2iL: 4412,I4412 FIrg016YLTANTIP¢: IML4.2a 26416001are14Y Maws 1•A24664601lrwrl IMAMS* L•Reahwliian(Talk a I A4wa5.FV. PYNy 1001102E Tow Y•1141*M..rir(IY 14-IL 6.0.4.4414) E30.00010 Mis(1ea 22,CI.w 65•T.Mr41466h 10.210L0 TOTAL M. MAMA PAGE 7 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES WICHITA FALLS REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROJECT GENERAL in accordance with the requirements established by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the unique needs and interests of the City of Wichita Falls(Owner),the owner and operator of Wichita Falls Regional Airport(SPS or Airport).this Scope of Services outlines the tasks required to complete an Airport Master Plan(AMP)Update for SPS. The Airport Master Plan(AMP)Update will be in alignment with FAA Advisory Circular(AC)15015070.6B Airport Master Plans and include the development of a new Airport Layout Plan(ALP)drawing set and Exhibit A property map in compliance with FAA ARP SOP 2.00 and 3.00- The general priorities/goals for this AMP Update are as follows: • Analyze the need and feasibility of acquiring additional property for civilian aviation use. • Evaluate the potential for SPS to re-enter the FAA's Military Airport Program(MAP). • Establish a future development plan to accommodate potential aeronautical growth. • Establish a CIP to identify necessary improvements to maintain and develop airport facilities to support civilian aeronautical use. The property SPS is located on is owned by the federal government and is considered to be part of Sheppard Air Force Base(SAFB). The City of Wichita Falls leases the areas outlined in red in Figure 1 for civilian aviation use. Civilian aircraft may use other aeronautical facilities at SAFB when allowed by the U.S.Air Force. Figure 1—SPS Lease Area �ti. .. --;10* \ gNet` 11 t • rF. � n Runw y 17/35 L.. _.. 1 15 Appendix A-Scope of Services 1 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 8 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F iiARVER ELEMENT 1-PROJECT INITIATION,ADMINISTRATION,AND VISIONING Task 1.1—Project Kick-Off Meeting Upon receiving Notice to Proceed(NTP),Garver will schedule and complete a project kick-off meeting with key Airport staff, stakeholders,and FAA. The focus of this meeting will be to review the project schedule. scope,and immediate next steps. This meeting is expected to take place via video/teleconference, The meeting will include a discussion on the establishment of the Project Steering Committee(PSC)and various stakeholders that need to be involved in the project as discussed in Task 1.2. Additionally,the agenda for the initial site visit and interviews(Task 1.3)will be discussed. Task 12—Establish Project Committee and Stakeholder Coordination Strategy A Project Steering Committee(PSC)will be established to guide and direct the development of the AMP Update. The PSC wit review project deliverables, provide input on the project's direction,and act as a liaison to the cornmuniiy throughout the planning process The PSC is expected to be comprised of airport staff,key airport stakeholders.rniliary,community leaders,and the FAA.Garver will work with the Owner to identity the individuals that should be part of the PSC and will compose documentation describing the roles end responsibilities of the PSC that can be sent to the proposed PSC committee members. Additionally.Garver will work with the Owner to identify other key stakeholders that should be involved in the planning process and the portions of the planning process they need to be involved in.The results of this effort wit!be a list of key project stakeholders and the identification of where and how each stakeholder will be engaged in the project. This task assumes that up to six(6)virtual meetings will be completed with key stakeholders to gather their impact at some point during the project. Task 1.3—Initial Site Visit and Interviews Garver will schedule and complete an initial site visit to SPS that will include the following subtasks: • Tourlreview of Owner leased airfield facilities (e.g., runways, taxiways/taxiianes, NAVAiDs,and other infrastructure)to document existing infrastructure • Tour/review of support facilities(e.g..ARFF.fuel farm,maintenance/snow removal)to document existing infrastructure and challenges. This is expected to include a meeting with key ARFF personnel at SPS. • four/review of a sampling of general aviation aircraft maintenance, and other on-airport civilian facilities to document infrastructure and existing use. The general age and use of all general aviation facilities will be documented. Photographs will be taken of all existing facilities and any gAn cal visual condition deficiencies will be noted. Inspections of existing facilities(e.g.,including internal infrastructure,building systems,etc.)are riot included. • Tour/review landside facilities (e.g., curb, parking, roadways. etc.) within SPS' lease limits to document existing infrastructure,use,and challenges. • Conduct up to six(6).one-naur interviews with various community officials,tenants,the military, or other key airport stakeholders to discuss the future of SPS and any proposed development plans, Garver will work directly with the Owner to identify the various individuals/organizations that should be interviewed as part of this effort. This site visit will be completed in three(3)days and will include two(2)Garver staff members.This task includes the preparation of meeting materials(e.g.,meeting agendas,exhibits,etc.)necessary for the site Appendix A-Scope of Services 2 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 9 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER visit. Additionally, meeting minutes will be developed for all six(6)interviews. This site visit will also include the completion of the visioning session discussed in Task 1,4. Task 1.4—Visioning Session As part of the initial site visit(Task 1.3),Garver will facilitate a visioning session with key stakeholders and community leaders. The visioning session will include the completion of a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities,and Threats(SWOT)analysis and the identification of items of key importance(e.g.vision items)that will be critical to the future growth and success of SPS. The primary goal of this effort is to establish an understanding amongst key stakeholders regarding the vision items that are most important to the future of the Airport.The identified vision items will be emphasized throughout the remainder of the AMP update process.The visioning session is expected to take approximately two(2)hours. Upon completion of the visioning session,Garver will prepare a technical memorandum and circulate it to the visioning session participants for their review and comment.The technical memorandum Ls expected to be three(3)to four(4) pages in length. It wilt summarize the results of the SWOT analysis and the key vision items identified.The participants will provide comments to Garver on the technical memorandum in writing.Garver will make necessary revisions to the document prior to finalizing the technical memorandum. This task includes the preparation of meeting materials necessary for the visioning session including presentation materials and handouts. Task 1.5—Initial Open House Garver will complete an initial public open house as part of project initiation to gather input/feedback related to SPS that will be utilized as part of the master planning process. Several presentation boards showing the existing facilities at SPS will be prepared. The open house will be approximately 2 hours in length and will be held at a location in the Wichita Falls community. The open house will be attended by two(2)Garver staff members, The initial public open house is expected to be completed as part of the same trip discussed in Task 1.3 and 1 4. Task 1.6—Project Management,Grant Administration,and Scoping Garver will provide general project management services throughout the duration of the project. Additionally,Garver will assist the Owner with the preparation of grant documents, grant reimbursement requests, and quarterly performance reports related to the project. Garver will prepare and revise, as needed,the scope of services for the 5P5 AMP Update project, ELEMENT 2—INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Task 2.1--Initial Documentation Review Garver will collect and review the following documents and data to establish baseline information to build the inventory of existing facilities and conditions: • Historical list of capital projects/grant history. • Current and planned capital improvements at the Airport(as shown in the airport's current Capital Improvement Program). • Current FAA documentation regarding the Airport and its facilities(e.g. current 5010, instrument Appendix A-Scope of Services 3 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A10.32D PAGE 10 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARV ER approach procedures,airfield diagram,sectional/IFR charts,and Aeronautical Information Services data from the FAA National Flight Data Center). • Current/approved Airport Layout Plan(ALP). • Previous Airport Master Plan(AMP)and noise studies(if applicable). • Existing facility assessments and as-built plans for existing facilities/infrastructure (e.g. terminal building,roadways,other facilities). • SPS Airport Certification.Manual(ACM). • Current wildlife hazard assessment/wildlife hazardous management plan. • Airport Letters of Agreement(LOAs)or Memorandums of Understanding(MOUs). • SPS lease agreernent with SAFB. • FAA runway incursion data for SPS. • Historical fuel flowage(previous 5 years broken down by 1o0LL and Jet A—civilian only). • Existing airport rules and regulations and minimum standards. • Existing local zoning ordinances/maps and any airport zoning related processes/practices. • Existing environmental data/information(e.g.previous EA.EIS,other environmental determinations, threatened and endangered plants, fish, and wildlife data. cultural/archaeological/historical resources data, floodplains, farmland, etc.) as provided through publicly available Online u_,rabases/resources. • F.P;y eveilable topographic maps and available aerial photographs. • Utility location information for underground and above ground utilities located an airport property. This includes utility size and general location. All utility location and size information is expected to be obtained from the utility provider. • Existing pavement condition/strength reports. • Local comprehensive plan or other regional development/land-use plans. • Public parking lot utilization data. • Traffic count studies. No new traffic counts will be performed as part of this project Garver will review each of the items identified to assess their importance to the Airport Master Plan Update and integrate them in the inventory documentation discussed in Task 2.3. Garver will coordinate with local utility companies to obtain information related to the approximate location of any underground utility lines that the Airport currently does riot have documentation on.In-field utility investigation is not included as pail of this task, The information reviewed during this effort and obtained during the Initial site visit(Task 1.3)and Terminal Area Inventory(Task 2.2)will be used to develop the Inventory Chapter. Task 2.2—Existing Conditions—terminal Area Inventory This task will be performed by Alliiance,an architectual sub to Garver for the SPS AMP Update. Garver will provide support to Alliiance as part of this task. The objective of this task is to inventory the physical area of the terminal to create a baseline of existing conditions which will be utilized in subsequent tasks. This detailed inventory of space will be tabulated try key categories of functional use which will be used as a basis or comparison to Future proiecticns of space based on the prepared forecast, Appendix A-Scope of Services 4 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Projrrct No,22A14320 PAGE 11 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER The following terminal areas will be documented: • Aircraft gate layout(including size and types of aircraft) • Ticketing/Check-in(including Self-Service Device vs Agent if applicable) • Airline Ticket Offices(ATO) • Baggage Screening • Outbound Baggage Makeup • TSA Security Screening Checkpoint • Gate Holdrooms • Concessions including Rental Car • Restrooms a Baggage Claim • Inbound baggage laydown • Airline/Airport Operations • Offices(TSA,Airport Administration.Public Safety,etc.) • Terminal Maintenance and Support • Circulation The team will review existing documents including the current Airport Layout Plan(ALP),current"as-built" terminal AutoCAD plans,and any additional files applicable to the study such as passenger intercept surveys which may have already been gathered by the Airport. An onsite facility tour will aid in validation of the existing plans and provide the Team with the opportunity to conduct field observations of the various passenger processing areas and terminal operations, This will help to gain both a subjective and quantitative sense for how aircraft,passengers,and baggage are processed. Additionally,interviews with the various tenant stakeholders such as those by the airlines.the Transportation Security Administration(TSA).any concessionaires(food and beverage,retail,rental car)if available,and Airport staff will be conducted.These discussions will assist in gathering pertinent information regarding passenger demographics and processing rates,airline staffing policies,baggage operations and throughput,and any other key factors including but not limited to: • Passenger early arrival distributions(show up time prior to their scheduled departure time) • Passenger profiles by check-in type(i.e..Self-Service Device,Agent,Bag Drop, Online,straight to security,etc.) • Bags per passenger • Travel party size • Meeter 8 Greeter ratios Task 2,3--Prepare Draft Inventory Chapter Garver will prepare a draft of the Inventory Chapter using the data and information captured as past of the site visit(Task 1.3),data review(Task 2.1).and terminal area inventory(Task 2.2): • Airfield and NAVAIDs: Garver will prepare a narrative section describing the existing airfield infrastructure and NAVAIDs. This is expected to include documenting the existing infrastructure's protected surfaces(e..g.,NAVA1D critical areas,airport design surfaces.etc.)as well as the age and ownership of all NAVAIDs. This includes the development of up to Iwo(2)exhibits to visually depict this information. The aeronautical infrastructure not leased by the Owner(e.g.,Runway 15R133L, 15C/33C,15L133R.taxiways.and NAVAIDs)will only be documented al a basic level. The primary focus will be on documenting infrastructure teased by the Owner and any NAVAIDs owned by the FM. Appendix A-Scope of Services 5 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A 14320 PAGE 12 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARV ER Teri root Area Facilities: Garver will prepare a narrative section summarizing the existing civilian terminal building and landside facilities (e.g., curbs, parking lots, etc.). This includes the development of up to two(2)exhibits to visually depict this information. • Support Facilities: Garver will prepare a narrative section describing the existing support facilities at the airport le.g., ARFF, fuel, airport maintenance/snow removal, etc.). This will include documenting ARFF equipment and response routes. This includes the development of up to two (2)exhibits to visually depict this information. • I_Itruenent pisornpahes: Garver will prepare a narrative section describing the existing instrument ip.prnaches at SPS. This will include documenting the procedure types and existing minimums. • 3uildi,irg.and Hangar Utilization,:Garver will prepare a narrative section describing the general use altl,_vilian facilities on the property leased. Any specific findings from the inventory site visit and tale collection will be documenled. This includes the development of up to two (2)exhibits to v:sually depict Ibis information. • Auto Access_s,:d rkln Garver will prepare a narrative section describing the existing parking and at the airport including their general size and use, This includes the development of up to two i2:, x.h i:;:,;O?visually depict this information, • t tildes: The location and size of existing on-airport utilities will be identified. This includes the development of up to two(2)exhibits to visually depict this information. • Environmental: Garver will perform baseline assessments of existing conditions and determine applicable environmental factors and resources.A constraints map will be developed to identify and show existing locations of environmental resources such as but not limited to water resources, community facilities,hazardous material sites,and cultural sites. Garver will present the data in written form with tables and graphics.The draft chapter will be submitted to the PSSC as a PGF for review.The PSC wit provide written comments to Garver for incorporation into the final version of the Inventory Chapter. ELEMENT 3—AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECASTS Task 3.1—Inventory of Historical and Current Air Traffic Activity Current and historical air traffic activity, based aircraft information,and en,-.l,nernent;i-ies.snnge-d,ato f.Jr SPS will be assembled and organized. Historical air traffic activity will be broken down into total annual operations,operations by user category (e.g.GA, air taxi,military,etc.),local vs itinerant, and IFR vs.VFR. Historical traffic/activity data will be obtained from the FAA,Owner,and the military.The FAA's Terminal Area Forecast(TAF)and Traffic Flow Management System Counts (TFMSC)databases will be utilized for this effort as well as the airports historical fuel sales information.Additionally, Garver will purchase three(3)years of aircraft arrival and departure data from a third-party flight dais vendor.This information will be utilized to identify •d' valuate operational peaks in aircraft activity levels and common arrivalfdeparture locations for aircraft uld'-,ng SPS. Aircraft operations data will also be requested from the military. Additional information concerning`iistorical peak hourly,daily,and monthly activity will be obtained through discussions with the Owner. Garver will also review published research and reports related to national and regional forecasts for air transportation demand in the United States to establish an understanding of how these trends may affect the Airport This is expected to include reviewing the most recent versions of the FAA'S Aerospace Forecast and the General Aviation Manufacturers Association's (CAinIA) annual report, Publicly available Appendix A-Scope of Services 6 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 13 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER documentation related to emerging trends and technologies in aviation(e.g.,electric aircraft,vertical takeoff and landing aircraft,etc.)relevant to the forecasting effort will also be reviewed_ Garverwill also pull historical passenger and cargo data as provided by the FAA or the Owner to document historical trends. Task 3.2—Forecasting Interviews As part of the forecasting effort,Garver will complete up to two(2);nterviews with local/regional economic development officials(including the Chamber of Commerce)to discuss historical and forecasted economic trends that could impact the Airport. This information will be used ro inform he socioeconomic data analysis discussed in Task 3.3. The interviews are expected to be one(1)hour in length and will be f:Of rpleted as a video/teleconference. Task 3.3—Historical and Forecasted Sociuec.oru_7rnic Data tiavievr Garver will obtain statistical data on hirtoicc2!cii1 fore: sted soc+.=:eca'7rni,-.f.=ctors from publicly available source:.r tt: . Census.T.u::<:+s Dens:•;,spt:,:;L si',,ter, .sc )and','k::, rJs ?Ind t'uole economic forecast data, Thee t -ctc i e wi: ,r:c!u e.e.,+le r r,r,,t,,nc,ome,populal,,'n,and t usiress climate/characterietics of Wichita Fal,end ih_surrovn:J,nu:colon.voth an emphas s placed on the dentifcalion of specific a0ci0ec0nOmic chcr;cteristtcs and tre'ids thou are likely to affect p.'ie.economic growth and development of the area,This information will then be utilized to support forecasti i efforts(Task 3.5)focused on how these economic tren&could impact the growth of passengers traffic,aircraft operations,and based aircraft at SPS. Task 3.4--Air Service Analysis As part of the AMP Update project,Team Insight and Associates, LLC, a suh:onsutlsnt to Garver, will provide the following air service analysis support work related to the forecastir;0 • Conduct a virtual meeting with SPS airports staff • Assessing the framework of individual airlines' markets to identify h'storical airline competitive factors. • Based upon the meeting with SPS staff, estimate other new markets that may be feasible for inclusion in the forecast,recognizing airline consolidation trends,changing airline business models. evolving fleet strategies and changing government regulations.This effort would be geared toward ULCCs carriers. The analysis will include the following. ,, Perform an air service analysis of air service growth trends at the Wichita Falls Regional Airport. The growth trends that will be analyzed will include: business travel demand, leisure inbound 8 outboand travel demands.geographic regions will include Southeastern United States, Southwestern United States Western and Northeastern Regions of the United States. The analysis will also take into consideration changes in passenger demand and airline re-alignments caused by the impact of the COVID-1 g Pandemic. Air service data analysis fields will include city of origin,destination,annual passengers. daily passengers,stage length,ASM,RASH and optimal capacity levels,annual revenues, average fares.load factors,optimal aircraft type and recommended service patterns. A written report of the analyzed air service findings will be completed showing the relevant air service findings to the passenger growth Irenrds in the Passenger Demand ForecasL The written report will also include competitive economic,political and demographic trends as They relate to the air service development analyses Appendix A-Scope of Services 7 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 14 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER' A written report will also include and economic feasibility analysis of potential service enhancements by the Wichita Falls Regional Airport to further meet any identified increased passenger demand opportunities. The main focus will be on the potential establishment of providing above and below wing ground handling services for the airlines servicing the Airport. • Identify an Airport Service Catchment Area for the Wichita Falls metropolitan area. • Determine short, medium and king-range air service options and related risk/rewards for each option as they relate to projected passenger demand trends and long-term service from the Airport. • Analysis will identify the top five(5)domestic destinations within the defined regions that will be analyzed. • Determine the passenger demand trends within the Airport's Catchment Area to validate the identified air service options. • Identify competitive issues and trends at major competing airports, mainly Dallas — Fort Worth (DFW),Dallas—Love(DAL)and Oklahoma City(OKC)that will have impacts on potential Airport's Market shares. Identify economic,political and demographic trends that will have potential impacts on the Airport's market share growth in the short,medium and long—term as they relate to the air service analysis recommendations. Task 3,5—Prepare Aviation Forecasts Potential passenger, cargo, aeronautical activity, and based aircraft forecasts will be developed for the Airport based on historical and current activity levels(Task 3.1) national and regional aeronautical activity forecasts ;Iasi,. 3.1),the socioeconomic information discussed in tasks 3.2 and 3.3,and the air service analysis discussed in Task 3.4.The methodologies utilized to develop the potential aeronautical activity forecasts will involve a variety of forecasting techniques Inchid:iio statistical modeling techniques,growth extrapolations based on socioeconomic factors and tie a.p;l c.-;tron of national/regional forecast models established by the FAA. The baseline year for the fr,r,,:.Ast.w it be 2022 with the first forecast year being 2023.After 2023(year one of the forecast).forecasts will be prepared in five-year increments(2027.2032. 2037,and 2042)for the 20-year planning horizon with projections for each of the following: • Baseline Forecasts Based Aircraft(including fleet mix) Total Operations Cargo Activity Passenger Enplanements/Deptenements • Derivative Forecasts Local vs Itinerant Operations oa Fleet Mix Operations(by Aircraft Design Group and Approach Category) Instrument.Approactiev Airport Peaking Characteristir:.q. f he baseline forecast.will be compared to the F.4A'<o�.urrerr; I eri ni:t2,1 Are -LreCaut i ir.t-i foi the Airport Additionally.the Airport's Current an i ri;fr re,;;•in;.=i .r,.::il i3 rcraft type/category with rl: .:.t 500 annual operations)will be identified. A one(1) hour video/teleconference meeting will be held with the Owner and FAA to review the draft baseline forecast(e.g.annual operations and based aircraft)options prepared by Garver and to sCiect an Appendix A-Scope of Services 8 of 37 Wichita Fails Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project 22A14320 PAGE 15 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER initial preferred baseline forecast in each of these areas.This task includes the preparation of presentation materials needed for this meeting.These initial preferred baseline forecasts will then be used to complete draft derivative forecasts(e.g.local vs.itinerant,fleet mix,etc.). A follow-up one(1)hour video/teleconference meeting will be held with the Owner and FAA to review the draft derivative forecasts and collect feedback. Finally,Garver will present the results of the forecasting effort to the PSC for feedback.This is expected to be a single in-person meeting in Wichita Falls.One (1) Garver staff Member is expected to attend this meeting.The primary focus of this forecasting effort is to gain acceptance of the preferred forecast model prior to beginning the Facility Requirements phase of the project. Task 3.6—Prepare Draft Report Using the data and information obtained and evaluated during the forecasting process, a draft of the Forecast Chapter will be prepared. The report will document assumptions and methodologies used in preparing the aviation demand forecasts and serve as the basis for later tasks in the study. FAA will provide an official review and approval of the final draft of the Forecast Chapter prior to moving forward with the Facility Requirements portion of the project. ELEMENT 4—FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ' Task 4.1—Establishing Facility Requirements This task focuses on identifying the general magnitude of the improvements needed to meet current and forecasted demand at the Airport Airport facility requirement considerations will be based on the approved aeronautical activity forecast,current facilities. local requirements, and the vision for the Airport. Facility requirements will be identified by Planning Activity Levels(PAL)that correspond to the approved demand forecast and will be presented in tabular form.The PALs are expected to be correlated to each forecast interval as follows. • 2023(Year 1 of the Forecast)=PAL 1 • 2027(Year S of the Forecast)=PAL 2 • 2032(Year 10 of the Forecast)=PAL 3 • 2037(Year 15 of the Forecast)=PAL 4 • 2042(Year 20 of the Forecast)=PAL 5 Airside and Support Facility Requirements In this task,Garver will utilize facility planning criteria to evaluate the sufficiency of SPS's existing airslde and support facilities to meet forecasted demand.These criteria shall be based upon the latest state and federal standards(e.g.FM Advisory Circulars).best practices(e.g.Airport Cooperative Research Progr.rm reports)and Garvers professional experience.Airside and support facilities to be examined will include. • Runway Orientation(e.g.wind • Runway Length and width(in coverage) accordance with FAA lie 15n/57,75-4i 150/5300-13B) Appendix A-Scope of Services 9 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport Master Plan Update Gran vr'r Frc;,_ci Flu.22A1,32C' PAGE 16 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER • Taxiways(e.g,geometrical standards, • Airfield Pavement Strength prohibited configurations,layout, • Airfield Markings and Lighting spacing, ale-) . Airport flAVAIDS • Runway and Taxiway Safety Areas and . Instrument Approaches Object Free Areas ARFF Facilities • Runway Protection Zones(RPZ) • Snow Removal Facilities • Runway Obstacle Free Zones T he primary focus of this analysis will be reviewing the faerlily Iequirements related to aeronautical and support facilities located on the properly leased by the Owner horn SAFB. Non-Owner leased facilities (e.g.,Runway 15R133L 15C/33C.15L133R.taxiways.and fJAVAIDs)will only be analyzed at a basic level. Terminal Building Facility Requirements The terminal building facility requiremenls analysis will be performed by Alliiance,a subcansuitant to Gamer The primary objective of this rack is to develop the suture facility requirements to meet the projected demand levels over the 20-year planning horizon. Understanding the existing terminal capacity may be adequate for the next ten years or so[his task will help to identify any cureerd and future capacity shortfalls based on the demand projections. These projections assist in developing a roarimap for future terminal expansion by aiding in identifying and safeguarding land envelopes for future terminal development, This will be achieved through the following • Spreadsheet modeling will he utilized to doveleo space requirements;or all critical components of the terminal building orgeni.ed by major functional rise as identified,in the inventory task. The approach for developing the terminal requirements include guidance from various FAA Advisory Circulars,applicable Airport Cooperative Research(Ac RP)reports,TSA guidelines for both passenger and checked baggage screening,knowledge of industry trends and the application of industry accepted planning standards.Facility recommendations in general will be based on the International Air Transport Association(iATA)Leval of Service(LoS)'Optimum"standard where applicable. • A table of future terminal space demand organized by Planning Activity Levels(PAL)wilt be documented which identify"trigger"points at which future demand will exceed current facility capacity. These"trigger"points will also be documented graphically by functional area identifying those areas and the time at which additional expansion is required. • Gate requirements will he developed utilizing the demand forecast as well as from any future design day flight schedules(DDFS}_ In the absence of OOPS.various industry standard methods will be utilized such as:annual departures per geeF__s:r,nual enplanements per gate,and percent increase in annual operations. Results will be i.sl ii,leted by PAL showing both quantity and mix of aircraft type required. General Aviation/Landside Facility Requirements In this task, Garver will utilize facility planning criteria to evaluate the sufficiency of various general aviationllandside area facilities to meet forecasted demand.These criteria shall be based upon the latest local, slate, and federal requirements, best practices, and Garver's professional experience. General aviation/landside facility requirements to be examined will include: Appendix A-Scope of Services 10 of 37 Wiichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No,22A14320 PAGE 17 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER. • Aircraft parking apron(e.g.aircraft • Aircraft storage hangars(T-Flangars and parking and tie-down areas) Box Hangars) • FB0 facilities and amenities • Airport fuel farm • Automobile access and parking facilities The general aviation/landside facility requirements will be developed in the form of aggregate space requirements and will be compared to those that presently exist to identify the future development goals needed to maintain adequate service,function,and operation of the Airport. Task 4.2—Prepare Draft Report and Review Meetings Using raw data and information obtained and evaluated during the Facility Requirements process,Garver will develop a presentation outlining the results of the facility requirements analysis.This analysis will be presented to the PSC for their review and feedback prior to the development of the draft report. This is assumed to be a single in-person meeting that will take place in Wichita Fails.Two(2)Garver staff member are expected to attend this meeting. Once feedback on the draft facility requirements is obtained from the PSC,a draft report will be prepared describing the results of the facility requirements analysis. This report will present information, in both a narrative and graphic format about the Airport's existing facilities and the required facilities necessary to meet forecasted aviation demand. ELEMENT 5—LAND ACQUISITION REVIEW-ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS As part of this element,Garver will prepare environmental documents in support of the Airport Master Plan Update and a Phase I ESA in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration(FM)Orders 5450.4B& 1050.1F and the FAA Environmental Desk Reference for Airport Actions(Airports Desk Reference).The following services and tasks are based on the intention of the Airport to review three areas of interest for land acquisition(see Figure 2)to support the development of civilian aeronautical facilities.This scope of work will be limited to the three (3) areas of interest with a total acreage of less than 400 acres for environmental study and evaluation. Garver will perform environmental evaluations as part of the planning process for the AMP update.The purpose of these evaluations is to consider environmental factors to help thoroughly evaluate Airport development alternatives and to provide information that will help expedite subsequent processing including land acquisitions of potential areas for future growth and expansion as determined as a result Of the master planning process. Appendix A-Scope of Services 11 pt 37 Wichita Fails Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 18 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Figure 2—Potential Land Acquisition Areas ri_Nprie Me�e[Mxrrf[b Line Ac4�x[ien .. . r P ro 1,41 • 1174. 1 t` 4 Task 5.1-Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Garver will perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to meet all requirements set forth in the revised ASTM(ASTM El527-21).Three areas of interest for land acquisition will be evaluated and separate Phase I ESA will be conducted for each site to identify and determine the scope of contamination if any,and to make recommendations for further analysis.A qualified subject matter expert will perform these services and make recommendations for additional analyses required for the use and acquisition of any site,limiting any future cleanup liability,and assist the Airport with identifying other responsible parties who have cleanup liability in advance of the land acquisition process, Appendix A-Scope of Services 12 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 19 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F OtARV ER Task,,S„2,1_ Agency Review/Historical Review Investigate past land uses through review of U S.Geologic Survey(USGS)topographic maps,historical aerial photographs.Sanborn maps(if available),Chain of Title or other docr.mentation of ownership(if provided by the Owner),or other reasonably available historical documents. Garver will order a database report and review information in federal and state regulatory records for the subject property, including records related to environmental-related permits,notices-Of-violation.and incidents involving use.disposal,or accidental release of hazardous substances,petroleum products,or other waste materials Local records,if available.related to the subject properly will also be reviewed for indications of orivironmental concern. Obtain additional information or conduct interviews as necessary and appropriate with present and past owners and operators of the property,neighbors,local municipalities,and utilities.Such inquiries may be modified to fit site-specific circus stances. Review any other relevant information provided by the Owner or Owner's agents regarding environmental permits violations,and correspondence with,environmental agencies Task 5.2.2—Site Reconnaissance Conduct a site reconnaissance of the subject property and the surrounding area to verify information obtained horn public records,maps.etc.,and to determine likely drainage pathways and environmental and human receptors. Perform a complete tour of the property to document; • Any areas that appear to have been used for material handling or disposal. • General property condition and apparent uses. • Existence and condition of any structures on the property. • Storm water flow direction and apparent run-on and runoff points. • Evidence of sumps,storage tanks,or other devices that collect or hold potentially hazardous materials. • indications of adverse environmental impact(e.g. stains,stressed vegetation). • Activities on adjacent properties that might potentially affect the subject property. • Any sensitive or unique t:nvirori rentol features. Task 5.2,3—Data Analysis and Reporting The Phase I ESA report will include: Area maps,historic aerial photographs,photographs taken during the site reconnaissance,the environmental records search results,and copies of any additional documents relevant to the ESA(e.g., available title information and properly descriptions,documents from public utilities and local municipalities sits plans). Appendix A-Scope of Services 13 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver l-'r.-.iocr N_ PAGE 20 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Narrative description of the property,facility.and surrounding area;observations from the site reconnaissance;results of interviews;discussion of the environmental records review and any information obtained from local sources;identification of potential areas of concern;and conclusions and recommendations. Task 5.2—Alternatives Analysis An alternatives analysis will be performed to evaluate the three areas of interest,Garver`s analyses will include a high-level evaluation of applicable environmental resources and concerns by development alternative,Three areas of interest for land acquisition Will be evaluated and included In the alternatives analysis to determine viability for.acquisition and use by the Airport.A matrix will be prepared to study these areas for comparison and rated by criteria of applicable environmental resources,to be determined through scoping and development of the constraints map.A discussion of the findings by alternative will be included in the master plan document. ELEMENT 6—AIRPORT ALTERNATIVES Task 6.1—Land Use Planning Prior to developing alternatives.Garver will prepare three(3)proposed land-use plan alternatives for the Airport that segment portions of existing airport leased property and potential property aquisitions into the following categories: • Aeronautical Business Area—Land well suited for the development of aeronautical business(e.g. maintenance,avionics,etc.) • FRO Are—Land well suited to accommodate the development of an FRO_ • PrvateHangar Dc_y-etgp_ment Area Land well suited for the development of private hangars for reeroalonal or business use. • T-Hangar Development Area—Land well suited for the development of T-hangars. Other land-use categories may be added based on the evolution of the planning effort. The land-use plan alternatives will be reviewed with the PSC in a one(1)hour teleconference meeting and a preferred land- use plan will be selected. Garver will finalize the land-use plan prior to initiating Task 6.4. Task 6.2—Develop Airside Alternatives Based on the facility requirements established in Element 4 of this scope of services,up to two(2)airsrde development alternatives will be created.Airside alternatives will be based on schemes for development within existing or expanded airport boundaries and will show the necessary runway.taxiway,and instrument approach procedure improvements during the 20-year planning period. This task will be conducted simultaneously with Task 6.3 and Task 6.4 and will result in a series of overall development alternatives for the Airport. Airside alternatives will be evaluated based on their ability to satisfy the identified facility requirements, environmental considerations,engineering factors,cost(rough order of magnitude cost level),and ease of implementation(e.g.existing business and residential impacts,land purchase.etc.). Appendix A-Scope of Services 14 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 21 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER• An evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the aforementioned factors associated with each airside alternative. Task 5.3—Terminal Building Alternatives This task will be performed by Alliiance,a subconsultant to Garver. The objective of this task is to develop various conceptual terminal area expansion alternatives to meet the programmatic requirements derived in the facility requirements effort. The ultimate goal will be to identify a preferred alternative plan which forms the basis of the terminal portion of the facilities implementation plan. This will be achieved through the following: • Provide up to five(5)initial terminal site expansion alternatives for the terminal core area. • After presenting the initial set of site alternatives,incorporate any necessary refinements, consolidation of alternatives,and the addition of any new concepts based on Airport review and comments. • Evaluate alternatives based on criteria such as operational,environmental,and financial impacts as welt as those derived from any previously set goals and objectives. From this exercise a set of up to three(3)shortlisted alternatives will be identified and carried forward For further refinement and evaluation. • Final evaluation of the shortlisted alternatives will be conducted using the previous set of evaluation criteria to determine the preferred alternative. • The preferred alternative will include high level site diagrams depicting major expansion elements. Any potential future terminal expansion development beyond the 20-year planning horizon will also be graphically documented. Task 6.4—Develop General AviationlLandside Alternatives Based on the facility requirements established in the preceding project element up to four(4) general aviationllandside development alternatives will be created. General aviationllandside alternatives will be based on schemes for development within existing or expanded airport boundaries and will show necessary apron,hangar,FBO,vehicle parking,and roadways improvements during the 20-year planning period.This task will be conducted simultaneously with Task 6.2 and 6.3 and will result in a series of overall development alternatives for the Airport. General aviatronllandside allernatives will be evaluated based on their ability to satisfy the identified facility requirements,environmental considerations,engineering factors,cost(order of magnitude cost level),ease of implementation (e.g. existing business and residential impacts, land purchase, etc.), and their congruence with the airside and terminal building alternatives. An evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the aforementioned factors associated with each landsidetterminal alternative, Task 6.5—Alternatives Presentation to PSC Garver will conduct an on-site meeting to present the draft alternatives to the PSC along with the evaluation of the alternatives.The result of the meeting will be the selection of the preferred alternative for the Airport for each area(e.g.,airside,terminal building,general aviationllandside).This meeting is expected to take Appendix A-Scope of Services 15 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 22 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER place in W chita Falls and take approximately two(2)hours.Two(2)Garver staff members are expected to attend this meeting. This task also includes separate meetings with the Wichita Falls Chamber of Commerce and SAFE related to the proposed alternatives. These meetings are expected to take place in person. Task$.6-Public Workshop The alternatives will be presented to the public in the form of a single 2-hour public workshop. Two(2) Garver staff members are expected to attend this meeting.This task is to be completed on the same date as the alternatives presentation to the PSC discussed in Task 6.5. This task includes the preparation of presentation materials and handouts needed for the workshop.Feedback collected from the public will be considered in the process of establishing a preferred alternative for each area• A follow-up one-hour teleconference with the PSC will be held to review the feedback obtained from the public workshop and identify any necessary revisions to the preferred alternatives. Task 6.7-Prepare Draft Report Using data and information obtained and evaluated during the alternative's analysis process.a draft of the Alternatives Chapter will be prepared.This chapter will present information,in both a narrative and graphic format,about the Airport's development options necessary to meet forecast aviation demand and support tine vision items defined for the Airport(Task 1.4). Concurrence will be obtained from the Owner and FAA on the final preferred development alternatives prior to proceeding forward. ELEMENT 7-AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN DEVELOPMENT This Scope element includes the preparation an Airport Layout Plan(ALP)drawing sat that meets the requirements of • FAA AC 150/5300-13B,Airport Design • FAA Airports Standard Operating Procedure(SOP)2.0, Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans.and. • FAA Airports SOP 3.0,Standard Operating Procedure for FM Review of Exhibit'A'Airport Property Inventory Maps. The FAA updates tra-ri lime-to-time. The spe•:'fe versions identified above are plzrtn=d tc h .:ed Ic isms F,ro ;r:. It!:is FAA..ip,a!es any of the quid-cn':e materials during the course of this project.Garver and FAA will discuss Now to incorporate those changes into the ALP. This ALP set will include the Following sheets. • Cover Sheet • Airport Data.Sheet(s) • Airport Layout Drawing(showing existing and ultimate facilities) Appendix A-Scope of Services 16 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport-Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14321 PAGE 23 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F CARVER • Airspace Drawing • Airspace Data Tables • Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings Sheets-One for each runway end(8 total) ▪ Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Tables • Runway Centerline Profile Sheet • Departure Surface Drawings -One for each runway end(8 total) • Departure Surfaces Tables • Terminal Area Di awing(civilian facilities area only) • Land-Use Drawing • Exhibit A Airport Property Map The ALP set will be developed using computer-aided drafting program AutoCAl3 to facilitate revisions and transfers to other systems. The ALP will be completed using standard paper size (24" by 38"), layer structure,line types,and plot styles using AutoCAD 2022 or newer. Additional details regarding the sheets to be included in the ALP are provided below. Once approved by FAA,a printed copy of the full ALP set(24"x 36°)will be provided to the Owner.The final/approved version of the ALP will be signed by the Owner and FAA electronically. Task 7.1-ALP Cover Sheet and Airport Data Sheet Garver will prepare an ALP Cover Sheet end Airport Data Sheet meeting the requirements set forth in FAA SOP 2A0. The data sheet will include notations regarding existing and ultimate conditions.All tour runways at SPS will be included in the data tables. Task 7.2—Airport Layout Drawing-ExistinglUltimate Garver will prepare an Airport Layout Drawing(AM)reflecting existing and ultimate conditions at SPS.The drawing will include the identification of the following: • Runway,taxiways,buildings,NAVAIDS,parking areas,roads,lighting,fueling facilities,tie-down areas,and other prominent airport features with dimensions. • Trees,streams,known above ground utility lines,towers,and other prominent natural features. • Airport boundaries,runway protection zones,easements,and other areas that need to be controlled by the airport. • Areas reserved for future aviation and non-aviation development(land-use). • i opographic Contours. Task 7.3--Airport Airspace and Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings Garver will prepare the 14 CFR Part 77 airspace drawing and data table sheets for the airport and surrounding area based on the ultimate runway conditions. Appendix A-Scope of Services 17 of 37 Wichita Palls Regional Airport-Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 24 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Garver will prepare the inner portion of the approach surface drawings and data table sheets for the Airport to reflect existing and ultimate conditions,A separate sheet will be provided for each runway end at SPS. Task 7.4—Runway Centerline Profile Sheet Garver will prepare a runway centerline profile sheet using data obtained from the aeronautical survey (Element 9). Centerline profiles will be provided for all four runways. Task 7.6—Runway Departure Surface Drawings Garver will prepare the runway departure surface drawings and data tables to reflect the departure surface as defined in FM AC 1 5015 300-1 3B. A separate sheet will be provided for each runway end at SPS. Task 7.6—Terminal Area Drawing Garver will prepare a terminal area drawing showing a more detailed view of the established civilian terminal development area at SPE. Task 7.7—On-Airport Land Use Drawing A detailed and comprehensive land use plan for the area within the boundaries of the airport property line will be prepared based on the identified overall development concept. Task 7.8—Exhibit A Property Map Garver will prepare an Exhibit A property map in accordance with FM ARP SOP 3.00. Existing property information will be obtained from the Owner and the military. ELEMENT 8—AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Task 8.1—Financial Inventory This task will be performed by Leibowitz and Horton,a subconsultant to Garver. The objective of this task is io gather documents which affect the financial management of Airport operations and capital development and to confirm the structure, constraints, requirements and opportunities for financing the Master Plan Capital Improvement Program(CIP). The documents gathered and preliminarily reviewed wilt be used to complelesubsequent tasks for the Preliminary Financial Analysis. Our approach for conducting the Inventory of Financial Information task includes the followingkey steps • Interview key Airport officials to establish an understanding of the legal documents and agreements which affect financial management of the Airport • Gather the following documents along with any additional documents identified during the interview and review on a preliminary basis' Historical,detailed(account-by-account)financial statements and audit reports far thepast three years Appendix A-Scope of Services 18 of 37 Wichita Faits Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No,22A14320 PAGE 25 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER a Detailed year-to-date financial statements for the current year with budget remainrnyamounts a Current operating and capital budgets(internal as well as the CIP submitted to theFAA ADO) a Official statements/loan agreements for any outstanding debt issues o PFC quarterly reports for the most recently submitted quarter and the same reportsubmitted one year earlier c City ordinances, resolutions, administrative rules, regulations and policies establishingthe Airport and affecting its financial management o Airline use and lease agreements a Rental car(on-and off-airport)and other ground transportation agreements a Restaurant/Lounge.gift shop and speciarty retail concession agreements a FRO agreement, large hangar leases. typical T-hangar leases by size, improved & unimproved ground leases. cargo facility leases and other general aviation leaseagreements o Other Airpodl lease,concession,use and privilege agreements o FAA,state and local grant records o Historical aviation activity statistics for the past three years and current year-to-date by air carrier by month including enplanementa,deplanements,aircraft operations,landed weight, fuel flowage gallons and air cargo statistics • Identify potential funding sources for the Master Plan capital improvement program * Prepare master plan chapter sections describing the structure and regulatory framework of Airport financial management including a discussion of the sources and uses of capital funding. Task 8.2—Airport Development.Program Using the data collected and developed during previous project elements, Garver will create a comprehensive multi-year airport Capital Improvement Program(CIP)and phasing plan.This CIP will cover the 20-year planning period and will be divided into a three-phase development program:short-term{0-5 years),mid-term(6-10 years),and long-term(11-20 years). The short-term schedule will be provided year by year,providing a clear prioritization of near-term projects and allowing the Owner and FAA to migrate the CIF into the FAA funding system.Protect implementation triggers will be established for each project defined within the CIP to aid the Owner and FAA in determining when various projects need to be executed in the future. The proposed timing of future improvements will be in accordance with forecasted demand levels and include any necessary changes or additions to airport infrastructure (including compliance with airport design standards), 9AVAIDS,and property interests. Task 11.3—Airport Development Probable Costs Planning-level probable development costs will be prepared for each project in each phase of the CIP. Development costs will be estimated for each project and wilt be based on the preferred development concept,These estimates of probable costs will include land acquisition,construction costs, design fees, and legal/administrative fees(e.g.typically to support land acquisition).Cost estimates will be prepared in current-year dollars and are developed for planning purposes only. Appendix A-Scope of Services 19 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 26 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Task OA—Preliminary Financial Analysis This task will be performed by Leibowitz and Horton,a subconsuftant to Garver. The objective of this task is to prepare a Preliminary Financial Analysis for the recommender!CIP alternative provided by the Master Plan consultant. This preliminary evaluation includes considering Wichita Falls' overall capability to fund the CIP and finance Airport operations, The analysis identifies potential funding sources that are practical alternatives for financing the capital development projects. This analysis also includes identifying revenue enhancement opportunities at a summary level for planned development projects as well as potential additional revenue for existing facilities_ Our approach far conducting the Preliminary Financial Analysis task includes tie following key steps: • Review financial and legal information gathered during the Inventory of Financial Information task related to financial condition,Airport policies, administrative regulations, grant status,airline use and lease agreements and other Airport user agreements which affect the financial management of the Airport anti which will effect the financial reasonableness of implementing the Capital Improvement Program • Review the aviation activity forecast and preliminary development costs and implementation schedules (provided by the Master Plan consultant) to consider possible revisions in the development scope and timing • [valuate revenue enhancement opportunities at a summary level for air;rdr.terminal and landside operations which may result from capital program improvements. • Develop summary level financial projections of funding sources,funding requirements and other information to provide a basis for assessing preliminary financial plans of the CIP. Revenue and capital funding projections will he compared with operating&maintenance expense and capital expenditure projections to identify a balanced approach for developing and funding the program. • Conduct workshop sessions with Airport officials to review and discuss the preliminary financing schedules.Resolve funding shortfalls identified in the capital program by revising the CIP schedule, CIP scope andior capital funding sources. Identity funding preferences and other funding resources that the Airport may cant to utilize This task Includes the completion of a workshop to review/revise the preliminary financing schedules. Task 8.5 Financial Plan Development This task will be performed by Leibowitz and Horton,a subconsultant to Garver. The objective of this task is to prepare a detailed financial plan for implementation of the selected Master Plan alternative. The Financial implementation Plan resulting from this task wilt present reasonable guidelines,on a preliminary basis,for matching projected financial resources with financial needs. Airline rates and charges and costs per enplaned passenger resulting from the new development will be calculated at a summary level using the Airport's current methodology and airline lease agreements for determining user fees. Our approach for preparing the Financial Implementation Plan includes the following key steps. Appendix A-Scope of Services 20 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 27 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVErR • Develop projection of operating&maintenance expenses-review historical O&M expenses and identity trends and anticipated increases/decreases. Review the potential effect of the CEP on projected O&M expenses Interview Airport management to develop appropriate O&M projection assumptions and to identify other anticipated changes. • Develop projection of non-airline operating revenues review historical non-airline revenues (including concessions.parking,car rentals,general aviation,FBO activities,fuel flowage,hangar leases. commercial/industrial and other leases) and determine trends for future projections. Inlervrew Airport management to develop appropriate non-airline revenue assumptions, • Evaluate tt,e revenue generating potential of food & beverage, news E, gift and specialty retail concessions for terrrtihal building development areas. Evaluate opportunities for additional revenue generation of car rental companies,other ground transportation and public parking fees. Identify other revenue enhancement opportunities which may result from capital development projects. ■ Develop projection of capital improvement expenditures -review the selected CIP project list with construction cost estimates, escalation rates and scheduling of expenditures to determine the annual need for capital funding. Interview Airport management and the Master Plan consultant to develop appropriate projection assumptions. ■ Determine funding sources for the financial plan and develop projection for financing the CIP - review the summary of potential funding sources developed in the Preliminary Financial Analysis task (including federal and state grants, PFGs. economic development funds, debt funding, net revenues. bank financing, other sources)with Airport management and determine sources to be used for financing the program. Develop projection of capital financing based the annual amount and availability of funds. Interview Airport management to develop appropriate projection assumptions, • Determine and develop a summary projection of airline rates an charges - review rate development methodol0oy i,sed for determining rates and charges. iri rvie.v.Airr,c-rt management to develop appropriate projection assumptions. • Evaluate the reasonableness of projected airline rates and charges and coat per enplaned passenger-calculate the coil per enplaned passenger resulting from the financial projection_ Compare the projected airline rates and charges and the cost per enplaned passenger With industry averages of other airports of similar size and operation. Tar•'.:8.e-Prepare Draft Report Using the dale and infirrnairon obtained in developing the CIP,a CPP and Financial Plan Chapter will be preipared r;- rly !::vir,y r.r t the Airport's CIP, project trigger mechaniSms, project cost estimates. and potential ra,,r}i'} sources i iris sport will be submitted in PDF format to the PSC for review and comment Updates to the report will be mode based on feedback received. ELEMENT 9-AERONAUTICAL SJRVEY The aeronautic oi rurvory for this A?v'F update will be c„ploied by Martinez Geospatial,a subconsultant to Garver. The scope for this work is included as Alta.nrrierILA. Appendix A-Scope of Services 21 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport-Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 28 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER ELEMENT 10—FINAL DOCUMENTATION/COORDINATION MEETINGS Task 10_1—Final Draft Report A final draft report will be assembled from the information developed in Elements 1 through 9 of this scope of services.The final draft will be submitted to the PSC in PDF format for review and comment.Garver will review Final comments provided by the PSC and will incorporate them into the final report.as appropriate. The final draft will include an Introduction Chapter,table of contents,and dividers. Task 10.2—Final Report One copy of the final report will be printed and submitted to the Owner.As previously mentioned,a 24•x 36'printed version of the signed ALP will be provided to the Owner.In addition,an electronic copy of the study and associated drawings will be provided via a file share service to FAA and the Owner.The ALP files will he provided to the Owner and FAA in Shapefle,AutoCAD,and PDF formats. Task 10.3—City Council Approval Garver will provide support for the acceptancaiadoption of the Airport Master Plan update locally through attendance_ at one I I)City of Wichita Falls Council meeting.One(1)Garver staff member is expected to attend this meeting.This will include preparing a brief presentation describing the results of the planning process acid the proposed future development plan. Task 10.4—SustalnabilltylWaste Reduction Plan Garver will provide the Owner with a basic waste reductionlsustamability plan in compliance with FAA Advisory Circular 154/5070-6E. A+rpori Master Plans This is expected to be a stand-alone memorandum that will be three(3)to five(5)pages.The plan will identify ways the airport could reduce waste and manage the airport's environmental impact. Extra Work: For clarification purposes,the proposed scup::.;'sr;nr:.>:;Sr:i ii;i.A. .0r:',_.ayOu`.i'l: r,specifically does not include any of the following items/tasks stated blow • Survey work • Revisions or updates to airport rules and n--.._iul,tions ur m riinwr-.siandsrd • Development of an Airport Business Plan. • Utility and drainage Location investigation or research ::ti,. i that, what is a:ci ressly included in the scope of services • Aerial photography • Instrument.Approach.Development • Additional meetings other than those expressly stated in this scope of services • Detailed facility essessmentsfrevieWs • Facility condition testing or the establishment of a pavement maintenance program • Graphic conceptual renderings of existing or future facilities • The preparation of materials and exhibits for leases, development contracts, or other documents/materials outside of this Airport Layout Plan • Detailed engineering C;p5t estimates Appendix A-Scope of Services 22 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No_22A14320 PAGE 29 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER • Design or conceptual design work • Detailed land development planning • Preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The construction contract documents will require the Contractor to prepare,maintain,and submit.a SWPPP to DEQ. • Environmental Handling and Documentation,including wetland and/or stream mitigation plans,or other work related to environmentally or historically(culturally)significant items beyond those listed herein. • Evaluation of airport energy usage beyond desktop review of existing information. • Coordination with FEMA and preparation/submittal of a CLOMR and/or LOMR. • Coordination to obtain right-of-entry for environmental investigations. • Completion of a biological surveylassessment or presence/absence threatened or endangered species surveys. • Completion of a Wildlife Hazard Site Visit,Wildlife Hazard Assessment,and/or wildlife management plan. • Phase It Soil and groundwater sampling and testing. • Phase in Remediation • Phase I or II Environmental Due Diligence Audit(EDDA) • Completion of light emissions studies/evaluations. • Prepare an Individual Section 303(c)/4(f) statement or evaluation if determined to be necessary following consuttation with the appropriate agencies. • Prepare and submit a USACE Section 404 permit application. • Specialized studies(including detailed noise and air analysis)required by agencies. • Assistance associated with zoning or re-zoning property far proposed improvements. • Additional surveying and documentation of archaeological and historical sites. • Intensive historic resources surveys,mitigation for adverse effects,or development of agreement documents. • Coordination of and obtaining required agency permits. • Property acquisition and relocation services. Appendix A-Scope of Services 23 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 30 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Attachment A—Aeronautical Survey Scope morz,„) MARTINEZ GEOSPATIAL w nrn 1rw nvrcw r^wevrown Scope and Fee Proposal St:n v,Ph,,t,,i:r,rmmetry&rlirpnris GIS Service,. Wi:6i1.e E sl1s Municipal Airport 15P51 01117/2023 2915 Waters Road Suite 100 Eagan,Minnesota 55121 Tet.651.666.e 1.1 a www-mtigro.cem Appendix A-Scope of Services 24 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 31 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVEFI 5eope and Pe.Prnposol wlCWro roflr Murdopol Ahrwrt JSPSJ Skover I'No1oQr'ammv.y 1 Ahperw-GII1rrWrer 4tls Pr2073 PROJECT SUMMARY CLIENT Garver CLIENT CON:TACT Nathan Polsprove CLIENT ADDRESS 13750 San Pedro Ave Suile 560 San Ant.erw,TX 70232 PROJECT LOCATION 11rh is F Ari Mi r+iCtpai Airport(SPS) wrr„t;milt,I'x Martinez Geolspaltel.Inc.(MTZ. w.iI C.rov,c!.rr G•ARVFR with Phatogremmelry 1 Airports-GIS services n Support of a Master Plan/Airport Layout Pion.it Wichita Fells Municipal Airport(SFS). This scope Ir+ l,�r_'S 4 irs requnt+Ci i.3cOrripiy with FAA Airports-GIS program slanderds,All survey and photo-gran ii ietry rruls.will ne r cr.omphehed in accordance with the following Ad'v'iwry Clrcuiars. AC•150f5363.16?,f16f3) AC•15er536f3.17C(17C) AC•1 50 5300 11013[11013 The FAA Al ohpacliue for this prole•:.1•s to i.lie..l and 0.m it 5 ICty-Gnficaidata for the airport baser apping(planir1u:ri::,lrnrx,Jiaptiic data)cc:iertddin.9upport of the ALP will the folwlel;ati And 3uorrlhad to FAAAirparLa-GIS dal:P wit Include an CA sif..c1.oi u,r',;Airport Arspacia Anatysic•NAV.Liit+iovenlury S survey, arway Ends S Praries .7Uryd V..lnp' (thrOU911 remote-6Errtill91 nt p;ini ma;tr se f..Iopagraphtc+In".:l 6.172 will lulri,i ci;e aara Lollactidn,fa-mdd•nq,ar,r1 delivery oequlre nc•nts et th. FAA Aiirports•GIS pin-gram In gunnrril ?Ali"e:nppraaGh le lulftilirt9 Ire GIS rdyui1e w (G will ue.tLi L•n;ph SPlll>;a 1r..5c rtitviirwi I:elks o ouilii+e€t in Table 2-1(Surrey F"idduireneonls Melrlx)of 16B,ICaiurnri 'Airport Laycilt PJan" MT'Z wit.'make maximum usr of errs Ong data within the AGJP P'artel fen SAS,including Ohclacle Data wall FAA-aaslgned Manforare. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS STATS T Er:AS - ------ T ._. 'COUNTY 4VIi'HITA,d, PROJECT TYPE AVIATION IA RPFI S I;IS NCI LJOECP,j GOC ROItlArE SYSTEM CE,SAS STATE PLANE-NORTH CENTRAL ZONE 1*IORIZQNTAL.DATUM lJAGot VERTICAIr.DATUM IJA.S'P t3(ffCIVllFl) i=IEI-rJ-SURVEYIROViO1D8Y MAR INF—G0Q:;PATIAL,INC. MAPPING SCALE t-=10Ci t;,,. C.O.N7CILIRS MAPPING FORMATS REQLII.RFD 1FiTANDARD CAD v I]TPA and AIRPORTS-GIS ORTTHO RES A PHOTO FORMAT f n Appendix A-Scope of Services 25 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22.A 4320 PAGE 32 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F G►►RV E.R Scepv one Inv W lcnl+n fcl],Monlrinnl{ep0.1 ISriy 5yrvvy Phe+®pvmmelry i Alrpore-Grt Services Wl1717023 PROJECT AREA DEFINITION The total proyacl area Consists of lhren cornponenls AREAA Planimetrlo S Topagrapnlc Mapping Llrr;lt-his area defines tree„I.,t lc,the,:+iR q:,I;.tilrn of tA�rn.:nri,: li YK rj 0 rI,"1•343 - mapp,+:a AREA B Part:7710C5 Airspace Anrtlysin L Emits- Lin+ire of Eno applrc Lyle btr:,huctlor Itle nlfficsOdPo Surfaces{O15)as defined by FAR Part r 1 rinrt AC ,SU153(ILI 1313 AREA C airy�rrw.G is Alto,pxc..:An.vlynis Llnrlta•Horizontal(,,mite of the appler.r!y�.(a:rtnn:S.r,r n-nI,thtJuC"I:?„rf:r,:or(Die)as defined in AC-15t]?e311O-it3e PROJECT TASKS Project Pia nningfProject Menage mentlFAA Airporta.GIS Can rdlnatlpnlFtCfdSurveyCoordination MTZ W,. css sl GAPVE.R r"doeelpp,Serbrrl.f,and gars apper el r.l tr,re'Slatement of Mork'far the pre trig rhrouit the FAA ADO and FAAArrports-G'S MTV toil a SFrnbte subred,andgain approval of lho,in.ojrrr f Pi;er,,3.1r,re?Oual.ty Control Plan.arcJ AP AC4i1.art i.ori Report through FAA Ail-pods-GSS MT2 w.11 A.I.,D w,--d,nrrin.with ryr,e field-sun eyor to easure all documentation required by AG'S.related to field•sarwcy ,;tc,,mprCt'NI ro!re,city.. Aerial Imagery A:qu r-Illore Na.valet aerial imagery will bo captured for at areas oullhnad in me PROJECT AREA DEFINITION section of this scope ufdirng a digital phgtogramme tic carnera The aerial Imagery acq ulst ion night mission will be executed In accordance with ail guidelines and apeoFlcations welvn FAA AC t 50..530r1- 17C. The aenel imagery acquisition flight mission will consist al a tangle'block'Of imagery es specified below IMAGERY RESOLUTION PURPOSE/USE lllcm The coverage limit for Oils imagery is the horizontal extents of AREA A,AREA B R AREA C.This irn.s_lury w II be ulif cod for all Wxrtagramrneinc data Collection,incursln3 planimelriGJtopcgrep7,fe mapping and ohstntction aunteyslaifs pare analysis Ontiro- fmagety will else SC 3CnCratCt!sir int area at a resolution of 0 50 GSD, I IyLl1._ori,fl(;(n41,tif the flight missltAr.IttL,,,.at r+,-y will be N..ne,•,e,ct if rcnyl,,n-nou;e Quality Assurance procedures iv,pllatograrnmafris ecceptdiri dy nn,.t cNnphan•:•n...All',AC l!i01.31h.I.t 7C..r:•quiremcnls Appendix A-Scope of Services 26 of 37 Wictlite Fells Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A 1432Q PAGE 33 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVEE Scope.,r•,]7ae rrnparol w•k 1*o r aI,M lrac ip c:Aeperi f lr 51 Survey..1'rtolhprmNry L AVporh•cl}7eMt14 WI171Yo23 Establish Geodetic Cantioi/Validate•+*+Ring PACs/SACS(Fletd Survey) mere ere nlrranlly:ne:P>.i:.5•,,lpnurnenf a+ut Iwo SACS monuments publ shed in the NGS database fOr Ina airport. v,.ql m.:,n,nnanls to serve as the probed tie to the NSRS III ,If.i i j rn.i;c,r;ar.c,i,nr un,r•r,rr:-e. � ynl ir�:�,i I.)r„a:rinaed co'the velldallon le unwccesak+r the scrrrrycr_-will temporary lteCdetic eontrut pr r t-,as required.Geodetic dela Will be tied to Ihti N5115 i-�II•ln t.re�attr l publiSlted ad1u51mluII clU1 i), raYowlna ore din t'r.e • FRCS S SAC:S -C;all:7ne,Er.) Station Designation f iD H,,,riznnlel Vurticef Datum GEOID Tyao ❑at4.1, PACS I SPSA A52811 NADR3(7011) NAVDIW GEOID:a SAC;:: SPS ARP A6E4 f 2 NA0831201 t _ NA VCJ88 R GECNOI SACS �.. SPS ARP 2 ABA4?1 NAt783t2011} NAVD88 GEO!D1@ Survey Imagery Photo Control Wield Survey) Photo-identifiable andfor arti11c4a1 targets will be selected/Set and surveyed for use as !groL tO convot for aerwuiannal r+orl of the new a•f,li Imagery, Imagery control points will be spread inrcugn„in lha aerial P,OICl•area in 2'1 1i1,r/lnc pattern cpnd'ucrva to fevrzraNe :aerr�gn�ngularu.r relies !Tisch imagery control ta.lnr wdi tin surveyed using RTK stervay methods 'ni/gilry Coclrci vrdl lei surveyed Iproper:v;lerl m IJSR'?q aril rbr]ume•nleu m n.ccixnrnCt,•.rite AC. t`ifv5SC§:i.t'IC:ail._!FAA Airputis GIS reN.neinenrs doaarnentalmr,w, be nrihmitrn I In FAA Airtdn3-GIS along vim Inn Aerial Phrlc-]:;any Acp uc'silion Report.It mantle aced Ehr,.l.24.rnagcry Lanlrol points wtfl be requaed.Per FAA,cqurrernenrs,n,ndddfon to the Imagery control 001011.an additional 8 Independent Cheokpnints wit ne surveyed and cr-n llrrl1 through PIGS OPUS Arm Triangulation The newty acgr+irad digest aerial im,Viery will be importned e,;,;.-i A digital photogramrneltio workstation whore it Will be oriented with field-su^,eyCO ground control procedure will establish both hnraonlal and vertical Central For oricnlrig in,Ii.di+af photogrammchic m0005. Tins Orienlaliprt will toe aCComptlshed using Solt Copy AertsV i r,zng laton methods Create Olgltel Ortho trrtagery Digital orlhopholos will ha produced to meet the needs of ri.k/VLi{ar:d trre Airport as well as to Amply With Iho requirements of the FAA Airpons•GtS program argil P. r q;.1:51/+-!. C.One set of Orth0pt'OI e MI he produced.O1Vlopholgs will cover the Following defined areas and meet the loHowinp speciticalions'. ,^.!SOLUTION Y etIVPAGE LIMIT riI till USU 1 AREA C.:(see attached oehdbit) Runway Surveys Time Survey) Field Surveyors will accomplish survey of all runway$et SPS(15C1331:,' t 5L133R,1 SRr33L,18r36); survey tasks will lnraude aurvey of runwayend-poeRs end runwayiilrnte.r:s For each nirvocty•ond• ppinNthreehrdd a monument will he sett,surveyed,,and documented ill aCCur{lance with AC-1561530f)• !86 Runway-centerline profiles and dlfset profiles will be surveyed utilizing motile-RTlt methodology Appendix A-Scope of Services 27 of 37 Wichita Fags Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 34 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER keno Corr FPS Prvevf4i WICAIr.tdry Moak,poi arpc l tsrs) Survey rhatoera mrna,v L Alryowh•LYS'Service' e4/l/teat final protiiFe data will be extracted al t4-toot statlone far FM Airports-GIS subrni sloe.Runway su very 'Jets wrM be utilized for lha Obstruction 5urveysJAJapen Airspace Analyse task. runhermort rn".m will indentify Ai-port Reference Point.Airport Elevation.ligh A Low Elevations or aarlr Runway ant Touchdown Zone Elevalir•r•:for each runway utidmng the newly surveyed Runway Data Runwi y survey dale'0011 5d rr t prc,i'r6rly lomlalted by MTZ and reported ih berth She FAA Airpar15•C15 deliverable end Iht:CAL)i::ssa-map delive at a. NAVAIO Survey*(Field Survey) Surveyors war amomplish field-survey of visual NAVAIDs A metewfogica equipment serving the BPS elrp0tl.Eett/NAVAJO will be Surveyed and documented In 346e/dame with AC•150/5304 1 AB.NAVALO survey data will be properly formatted by MTZ and reported in both the FAA Ai,pDrt;-r;lS deliverable and the CAD base•m ap deliverable. The NAVAIO Survey will include the rein,+n in • Airport Beaton 15G PA PI 15C ALSF 33C ALSF 151,P„PJ 33Fl PAP/ 15L RE1LS 7rd f?LIC.B t50ZPAM 33L PAP! J5F h!.1L ar^. 33L MALSR 3d REJLs sriP 7ai:Al�' SPA VORTAC /5C Localize, f 56 �o' soae 33L Locefizer 33L bME 3:a +:•,.r. ..r ASOS Wii+dsacks Airport Airspace Analysis/Obstruction Surveys 1513/AGIS An Airport Airspace Analysis mil be perfclmed in aCcondance with AC 15015300.1 Sle. Thes teak will ire. pedurrned in drdar So comply with the reeulrerrrants of lire FM Airpons-GtS Program for projects involving Arrpon Layout Plans All available existing obstacle dale Far SP•S will be obtained& downloaded Prom ADIP;existing obstacle data trulevanl to isle AGIS Airspace Analysis)will be validafc•u or updated OS necessary and in corporaled loin protect.Existing obstacle data will tie reported bare. to FAA through A©IP•iSonntifiable by assigned F .P,Obstacle-ID.The Arrpod Airspace Analysis Will meet the following specifications AGIS ANALYSIS TYOE t5C33C flu n+.+a.:.:-Wrrn'r h,rl P.=l-f'ahin urn 151.•33rt d-G.triddncz I ftLl Ways.wa r,..i,;arrr:al•Gardenia I Arad �hJll'rriy'-y'J.l".-1:ar1r-.�l••�;uidarr:+ Fr n!t use r..}>:,ri.e;i i!St"Jrr+i;!5 n:.-.1.,l.. .11 nil ABC'.ruin";in_lSr Chapter 5 Airorf Dale Feafures. Appendix A-Scope of Services 28 of 37 Wnhita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 35 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER 5eape card Par Properoi yyl�hire Y�]I'ly Mun]cy.v Al.ywl(Sr: Sonar,•,froli. oRwrialr.C AIrpof11•5115-4Mci/ 04/17/O02. Pan 771Obsfecle Clearance Surface(OCS) Ar,FAR Po:1 77 and y lit.; Su:vey w:r.her;i!:nuinicc in:of nrnway ends.Utilizing the dlgltat 3t .taken lrnegay Sri(II+t.cnbed Part 77 8 Ot:I5 C!bslnlcl cti-Iner Cetinn.5urtacas WIII ba examined Ind analyzed Is:uenhfy natural and manmade nt:•sois,*ana;raling Inc surlace5 OCS Surfaces will be based on the;wq,memenls of AC-15015300.43Et(Tables.3.2,3-3 3-4•and 3-S) The Pere 77 Obslr uctiocSurvey will meel the I..sIlrw•ng specI5caliens: RUNWAY PART Ti ANALYSIS TYPE 15e Prryi:Ician inslruniehl kUnwav i'Uri :33C Preras,dn•lnslrurrwnt IJunw P111'SR)" t5L Non-Preclsion•In54ri,nen[--C SNPi•C) .i3Ga VIyp31.OI.her-Than Ut/,l.y(LIV) 15(i Nor.-PreCi110n In,,truragnr-DSNPf•O) 33L Preclsion•:n5IRlmnnl.ptunway(PIR►' 19 Vrgua!-Ull.rr•Tha i+-UILty)bVJ 3n V- o l-i hl'r Than-Utility(eV) '-analyses.of 1t,c F•IR surface will b,'7rrn^y.-1 is the area covered by Iltie required AGIS imagery wlur-h rs aprrT irr>llr,ty 711.r}0[7 toot from rtu:w:,y,-nit The OC:S Ownrrillon Survey well end"I Ina(c Iowng opneifo31-{rnS tOCS Numbere are taken(tom AC- t36.Tyl;las 3 2,3-3 3-4.and 3-5t RVNWA(. -OCS ANf14..YFAS TYPE 15C C/CT:g(.3ld=:m Visrbilr{y�,}rnlrnt+rr,xj 15C C:;E b(Vr n+cal Guidance r rt ',__ 15C C/C S 7 rOep.a,tiire Surface) 37C u/Cs S i•31dsrr iris;7r!ty Af+nrn,urni. G IVar3+aa±Gri,dar rarce Smte) 7.11C CY:5 7 i0.,i,Ail e 1 lL C7,.S d(erasm V,9'ni4(y A rrlr uu'.s: ill OCS i j(;Bb,-rrf,:rC tir,dn^ef_ OCS W iyuaf.LRrW„.7+rcralii 13r. MS 717 •s1u SI ,..i........ 45R /'-'S S 34y,s:Vi.srbrirly f:a+run:umsI 15R OCS f{L•,'•riv:0l GuldanCO Suftacrr!.. t5R (X.1+rfoprrlrrre Surface) 33L LSCS 5 D 3i/:;r+,+,rr::rbrllt)Mipl trrtrr7il' 33L OCS 5(Vericar Guilarsr Soria c l 33L OCS 7(0aparturr'-rues) 18 6CS 3 04su3r.1 rlr77v•4lrrr7..R',,,,,,,,,,_,.,,,, 18 0CS 7{nepanurer Surw3ce.3 36 OCS 3{Visual,Largo Arrcrall) 3B OCS 7(Qeparfwe Surface) Appendix A-Scope of Services 29 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 36 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER c nor c•nd roe►ropotci wicnl:.:or:municipal Axpiel(SWS1 furvry.rt•oMerarnmalry&Fkpah-Gil Sorriest Mir 7r2023 Pert 77/OCS Coflecifon Crfferfa The obstruction-identification-surfaces.defined in kite previous section,will be digitally referenced with the 3D Stereo Imagery.Utilizing the 30 Imagery,trained technicians will visually examine all surfaces and tolled X-Y-Z point dole for Objects meeting collection crileda Collected data will then be mathematically analyzed against the surfaces using custom processes to produce a final dataset lelunipte ptralilyAssuranoe protease Ies podurmad for obstruction ante through the project life cycle to ensure accimacy and completeness.t?:+1.a will ce collected to fu1151 the following criteria 1) A single X-Y•2 paint win 0e cofitct-i:.i e:•I%-+.d fur any manmade or natural*eel penetrating Surreal.The point will be placard nn trnf 116110Y.point of the object The 7t-Y IOC86,rt will. correspond to the horizontal post 0nn:id the r synust porton of the stied.not neceasalily the gekmetrin tenter or middle ar ni rid 21 flccaslonalfy with Oitstruction Surveys•large grrn.lp of trees or terrain(obstruction creel are Found to penetrate a surface and it is nal reasrhlo nr passible to weed each individual penetration in these ceso5.Ihn obStrucllon race vnll be outlined with a bounding polygon in order to represent the r.•-,nzuntal extents of me.aria.A grid will than be overlaid an the obstructing area.With .Luc,^,old sector,the lu.chc.atdeject wnl4e collected.Widen the primary surface,the Irpnsitioncl!,..rsio,c..anrf witr.in rho 1,51 50000 teal of the approach surface,jug-loot grid spacing will be usco Within t[1.(1331 •+sr:,t the approach surface,Out Outside 5.000 feat. 200-foot grid spacing w Il be.sed.200-luci grin spacing will also be used within the hnci,nnlal surface.Ou45k%or 10,000 feet of the apparool surface and ti ilhei the conical gurtar_e.5G0-loot grid spacing will be used. Supplemental Obstacle Collection • Within the nisi 5.000leet of the Departure Sur/ace.MTZ Will collect significant manmade and natural objects with na enemptionS based cm negative penetration value For manmade obyects all buildings u851y poles.antennas.lowers.tine prominent obis cis wilt be collected(small objects,such as atailboxes,posts.and ulllily hoses will be ignored)For rcxtd-ways(including highways)end railrnwdo, the proper Part 71 offset will be applied COC,Ocdinq in Ire typo of vehicular traverse way(official Vehicle Service Roads will Ire inGuded end MAYAID Ser.a ttc,,ads wait be excluded). For vegetation• significant singular trees will be collected to the ext5nl possibledeaslble.In large areas of dense 60I0430On.a bounding polygon will be dread to sty io Ina extent&of the area A 100-loot grid call be applied and the highest vegetation point within each r;rook-sector will be collected. Appendix A-Scope of Services 30 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22i' •I32D PAGE 37 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER (cope no re.hoaerei wlcrIrn lac ILir.nieipal Moue ISP'y) Srar.•eY.rhak,„rurnrm.SY F Mperrs-6+5 Ser.ieaf 04/I717DES Pellrarable format Par Port 77 and AC-13R OCS Obstacle Data DELIVERABLE DESCRIPT17N Shapelle end CAD File These fife;will contain the fallowing 51rere.5 of dale. 1) Obslruttian Surface Linewdrk 7) Obstruction X-r•L Points 3) Obstruction Arse Polygon(d appli.:abre) a) Obstruction Area Grin(if applicable) Albibuies will ha included ShaaofileS will contain the fallowing;races pl aniricl dare In the Snapelire as Onlei l 0 Ieci vie Data.For the CAD r+emnir.g i E ow:ng+LMr•nrW.r tivt L I version.eitributos will.be • auynNLo^q•wrlu provided In Spreadsheet ▪ +.G:rre44.l 11- i n y-perasrns•rg P kanr:i.nr:nrv-Pr,rway-r.W Formal and can be cr0.c;• kogni-Ater a-1 vuyrryo.wr ZP•w referenced with She CAD life by Obtact Number. • Eroom-ia-Runway-End • were•r+ra-Frc.rr-R.n,wii{ar.iwrrt..l and on aeuen• Par.a!ralia,i Va:aa Id aawiica.•ycl ▪ S..datu ADO Clad A.Slope ap,carA.l Planlmebrio a Topographic Mapping Compilation tJ111rzing life aerotriangdtated digital imagery,photographic alien cabs wnl be oriented dot compiled or, digdal plrotogrammotr•c wnrkeiahnn5 within AREA A Mapping data wilt ba complied meeting the fallowing specificaiioes: PLANIMETRIC DATA SCALE 1-a100r SCALE(CLASS II STANDARDS) TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SCALE 2'CONTOUR INTERVAL(CLASS II STANDARDS) MAPPING DELIVERABLE FORMAT PLANIMETRIC FILE AUTOCAD(Other formats available upon request) 'CONTOUR FILE AUTOCAD(Other formats ava1Lanre upon request) DIGITAL-TERRAIN-MODEL FILE AUTOCAD(Odle,formats available upon request) The CAD products defined above will be delivcrad d•re:xty to GARVER far irtcorporelian rule ALP drawings. Planirnetrlc Feature&will include but are not limited to)' • E3diliding Outlines - Airfield Pavement(Aprons.Taxiways,Rvnwgya) Airfield Paint Martringe - Airfield Signs • Airfield Lights - RoadwayarRailWayeAridgee - Parking Lots - Sidewalks - To1MerSiAntennas • Utilities(Above-Oraand R Iden14nabte lri im&gnry) 7 • Appendix A-Scope of Services 31 of 37 Wichita Fails Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 38 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARV Eli Scapa and Imo ha,r:a1 WICMa iuIU Mvr.Ik.Iral AC.ao.l Isis} 'SuY+y,Hwtogrummalry I AUpwfa.G13 Sundt ra b1117/Sa73 Mapping Can and GI-5 Farrnatflnp In ann:r.en IS 0•2.ner31,no,r,r)pp.fro•78r],c,1-no i,:Sale05.5,1 i.`.I,r rr.n,^dais wdr tg...^enir?(1;,gnp lormatlger In /be a psi,pnniN ACil3 ir.rr*r:ii r I Lr.o, ,I1 ' .,rinl:i 1Ns.MT?.will n ss s.:I1h t>rw f,,r pai,aahav al' goo3pi:l5l-r5ISi5'i 3r,±1/nr,_ry/.,5t4 astnlbuia'•Ieau-i Hallos I.Ipinarl In general I,n/re/t.r;I.i final APSIS lips s`•:i,tu,'S DV MU will oletuae.born SafFity.•Critrcal and Non-SaPety,Cnticat Data. rr.,;InrllaSS 1t5f te'la,r;nq: SAFETY-CRPTICAL Airspace AC.188 Feature AC-1813 Section 1 Ob�l 171 j ObttruCtiOh Area.L applicable) 5 ti I• ..... Obstruction ID Surteca 5.5.a Runway AC•1913 Feature AC 18F SCtitDn ftun day End 5428 _ ftl.rrray I":pals Fain Is S:S 6' Cejnitil,r,e P;!.rjisilii idea Ferc/C., 5.8.2 Tcwc.ileowr,'ernrae f:+seals rl 5 Si Aornsrt.L19vslion 5.8.2 NAVAIDs AC-15&FVs'ury AC-18E S,ctiorr NavigaIonal Aid; All A�plscabkl-Grouu S 10 NOW-SAFETY-CRITICAL Planlmetrpc AC.188 Feature AC-1 pp 3i,{IJhr, All I slal All Apcli_x.U:e-C rr:up 5,a FA3,marlt. „r.,u 3,c AIL ADE.1 64?•6 Alp 5ICI iS r17 S f f Il /x,ri!rihrP n•1 M1CCI1 ible-C u6 ULIr:e. JIApjlit.sl•d-rrr $f-1 L. Topographic AC-188 Feature .AC48E1 S+sitian .. Elavattan Contour S 8 11: A.,f,Q^ri 1'x.A- -.. -.. c:i!!1cws 211'_ 'V vlci,lia P ps I s1,ni�.:! ••I;P.r-1[--Ms=,.-: I !:,I ;Jp:.o::p �crver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 39 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER ..cc p e-and•m n��ajan q a� W k-n hn 1 ailx M m.c Ip c!Air p.xi Orly °°OF.),rh VV7,=rnnrTry k A4parh-GliWyk,. 041 r;2oz.3 c;i$ rvicyl I1re ?r wing spBGfitalions: i 1S DATA-MODEL UTILIZED FM Al+lports•f3IS t4C 15W530O 6S.Chapter5) GfS DELIVERY FORMAT ArCGIS Snapefile Airports-GIS Data Submission si— "Final Reporting a. a:lla.wII h:r.`ra :±^:,1'NIA)eom+marl Airporls•GIS formal and preparod Iar submission. Prior to In; d s wit+4e psled using the FAA's survey-file-test loot in order to ensure . .....�!:�I.Ir: 1 .- =.rP w :,.:generated in accordance with Adwsory Circular 150153O0•18S and n,,:.:•.,r ., a:I!. :g .A TT wilt Gporninata with GARVER prior to uploading the.final ,.ak,n.MTZ will penedicatly followuu with GARVER until the'Anal y oGl Ci0.Se.du1 wiU ilbo C4hsist of ensuring racelpi and acc(40g,_. -. ,..cr,..R,..„.I-,".I IViiy„II;,digital mapping dela by GARVER,the FAA and NGS '1 Appendix A-Scope of Services 33 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project Na.22A 1s:320 PAGE 40 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Scapa and Ho hnporoi Igclele lolls M.Ncrpal upon firs) Sovly 7MNSgrommNNr a a rr.%rree Senders Wir7J7a'7J DELIVERABLE SUMMARY I)Stelemrrr!of Work Report Ref FM Anportad3lS approval) 2)lenederv/rthnOln Semen)plan Or FM Maoris-GIS aborovel) CGmrar Plan;tar FAA A spoils-G S approval) 4)Aorrai Phi-;•;.:cry;ryc��ui.i.��s ,.1Ix11(ac FM Aurpofl-GISamoral) 5)Pan 77 8 dnsia L 1.?-CI e.1 r.,nue-Surlaw obseuction/Perwba9an 0rete I)Supplemanaal Otiflecle Dais 7)Airfield as.-nep(F1enencUle&Topo0repbrc eeePpfnff DKR) e)Gpo;I°Pilo(imagery of AREA C(O,SO'Resolubbei B1 Canyxefernaiva FM Plrtyorla-GIS Deliverable.ere%elm of: A)Safely CrAIal Dela(Runway NAVAr6.and Alrpon Afravace Anai Chita I, B)rVm-Safely Cabcal Gala fPtaninwlnc a Tapoyrapric Mfapp•np} 10)Final Rapafl Vor FM Aiepch1543IS approval I Appendix A-Scope of Services 34 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 41 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Area A - Planimetric & Topographic Mapping r , .., ' YA \ .I A, ri!t'V • r 1 ti., (•'ram .1 ll +y. ` i3 `lac •`;+ . N ;4 f, 1 I 1 Ii �Cqy r • \la. ; -,,1411. . .• Magenta Polygnn Planimetric&topographic Mapping Limit Yr[,lokrtInte Geowalid Appendix A-Scope of Services 35 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No,22A14320 PAGE 42 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GAR V ER Area B - Part 7710CS Airspace Analysis r S! J 4 -tic.. 'K ri w ti, wt i �, t:i a. a - , k l ` 1a°`', ',w „ , , ':'' .-'_...,. _ , .'745;1 \ \ -.,...\ ,,, • A4 /4, - • wvr", � x�. a t,{ • * .4. 40, '.> °f r' . fir.. '4 _f Green Polygons-40.1 Departure Surfaces Magenta Polygons Part 77Obstruction Identification Surfaces 47.11111 ` Tv 65i ME F15 11k IFk'tiff.'F2Fdj4i Appendix A Scope of Services 36 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 PAGE 43 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F GARVER Area C - Airports-GIS Airspace Analysis • • • b-' r r. �a n ►+�yi (ircen Polygons-I (Airports-(iIS Obstruction Identification Surfaces Cyan Shaded Area•0-50 GS17Ortho Imagery Coverage rrrlu+nn.,awwa. nos w+:n girt,. ��k 4<=+ �rt•dgas.v Appendix A-Scope of Services 37 of 37 Wichita Falls Regional Airport—Master Plan Update Garver Project No.22A14320 J PAGE 44 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F i 1.- Wichita Falls Regional Airport wichi!u Foils,Texas ii 'buttes Months Ended September 2914 Apr112015 r FP I „. i CO . �.. C �,� v II summary L The Wichita Falls study area averaged 1.360 PDEW from October 2013 through a) September 2014,with 9,2%of those passengers using Wichita Falls_ LL a • 2 !94 study tickets were combined with US DOT Origin-Destination surveys covering the time period from October 2013 through September 2014, I 0) • 7 • .iuI!as Fort Worth International Airport captured 470 domestic and international passengers per day each way Horn the Wichita Falls study area. Houston,Las Vegas aria Denver generated the largest number of passengers tram ti I— the Wichita Fdls study area. r American,Southwest and Delta capture the largest number at passengers among I airlines pray ding service to Wichita Falls study area passengers. LI C Elk •171}'ik.r Confu11H9rMCun.W[ `" 4 00 Armstrong Dr Ste 8 497 llOakwrtiy Road.Suite 280 Wichttu Fulls.Texas 76305 Eugene,Oregon 97401 l., (9401 855-3623 (5411 341.1601 r PAGE 45 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Table of Contents I Tabu of Contents l 11, Sec lionr Page{5) Executive Summary 2 Background/Methadalagy/Market Areas 3 Study Airports/Market Areas/Hubs Studied 4 Section 1:Passenger Analysts 8 Wichita Fats Airport<Study Catchment Area 6 Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Passengers 7,8 Origirafion of Passengers in SPS Catchment Area by County 9 Origination of Passengers in SP5 Catchment Area by City 10 Origirarion of Passengers in SPS Catchment Area by Zip Code 11 Ne'enliorr of Pussengers at SPS by County 12 ittrre Monet Passenger Distribution al Wichita Falls 13 00 Largest Irue OLD Passenger Markets to/from the Wichita Falls Area 14-15 Airport Shares at largest True OLD Markers la/from the Wichita Fails Area I Airport usage at 50 Largest True OLD Markets to/lrarn the Wichita Falls Area 17-18 PrNrit of Original 100 Largest True OLD Markets to/frarn the Wichita Falls Area 19-20 Section 2:Revenue and Fore Analysis 31 Orvg,noting Airport for Wichita Fails Area Revenue 22-24 1;h'!urges,True OLD Revenue Markets to/t,.:;rn the Wichita Foils Area 25.26 1 Airport Usage at 50 Largest True OLD Revenue-markers so/from the Wichita Falls Area 27-28 Avg Fares by Airport a!50 Largest True OLD Mork ets to/tram the Wichita Falls Area 29-30 Section 3:Air Carrier Analysts 31 It Orrginal:n,g Airline for Wichita Falls Sf,.rfy Area Passengers 32 Air Carrier Usage a'50 Lurge:t Truro Orel!Markets to/tram the Wichita Falls Area 33-34 Air Corner Avy Fares at.5.7,Larger!True Cr&D Markets to/from the Wichita Falls Area 35.36 I Air Carrier Usage of 50 Largest True OLD Passenger Markets at SPS 37 Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True OLD Passenger Markets at SPS 38 Air Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at DFW 39-40 I, Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True OLD Passenger Markets al DPW 41-42 Air Carrier Usage al 50 Largest True OLD Passenger Markets at OKC 43-44 Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True OLD Passenger Markets at OKC 45-46 Section 4:CompeRRve Airports within the legion 47 /1 Service al SPS 48 Service of DFW Service at DAL 49 Service at OKC 50 Potential Pax/Rev Flows over Ar Carrier Hubs to/front the Wichita Foils Area 51 •52 Conclusions/Contact Information 53 Glossary of Terms 54 Appendices A-E 55-59 , I :I:, ••.,. , ,n=.•i •• ii.•.: • •ul :I. : . i, • ,1, '.. page 1 s.eC nae..a, PAGE 46 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F • 111 Executive Summary SPS Passenger Data il • it Is estimated that the Wichita Foils study area produced 100.0%of hckelti originating at Wichita Falls Regional Airport, II • Wichita Falls Rag:and Airport handled an average al 125 passengers per day each way Horn the Wichita Falls study area • Wichita Fans study area passengers using Wich'la Falls Regional Airport generated$23.6 million in annual revenue. I • The average one way airfare for Wichita Fats study area passengers using Wichita Falls Regional Airport is$258. jI True Market Analysis II ( • A total of 12 194 airline tickets were sampled From travelers in the W chila Falls study area. I • A'rlines reporting tckets 10 ARC include:American,Untied,Della Frontier Alaska and l.uflhonsa, I • Sixel Consulting Group makes adjustments to ARC data to account For LCC underreporting. • LCC carriers inci.rde: Allegiant,Southwest Spirit and Sun Country. I • Atter making the ad}ustment for LCC carriers,an estimated 1.360 total passengers per day are generated Ito/tram the study area with Wichita Falk capturing 125 passengers per day•9.2%of the total. • Those Wichita Falls study area passengers using Dallas/Ft Worth generated 470 passengers per day-34,6% 1 of the Wichita Fats study area total,while Oklahoma City captured 469 passengers per day-34.5%. • 1,243 Wichita Falls study area passengers per day-91.5%-travel to/from domestic U.S.airports. • 116 Wichita Falls study area passengers pet day are intemalienal passengers. ' • American captured the largest share of passengers in the Wichita Falls study area,generating 673 PDEW 49.5%of the total followed by Southwest(372 POEW,27.4%share)and Delta 1103 PDEW,7.6%share♦.. I • Houston Is the largest passenger market in the Wichita Fats study area,generating 91 PDEW, ILos Vegas is the 2nd largest passenger market in the study area,generating 70 PDEW. • The Wichita Foils study area generated o tatc':of;:t2a„M.P.'n in annual revenue, • The average one-way airfare for Wichita Falls study area passengers is$226. page 2 .. .. .. M-srNca�..iM•awr,..rc PAGE 47 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Background / Methodology / Market Areas background this ticket Lift/True Market study had three components. The first used anry tickets colected from the Airline Reporting Corporation. The second port of The study made an adjustment to ticketing data to take into account error rates tram underreported destinations(sample sizes Tao small to be accurate]and the effect of low-cost carriers with relatively low ratios of agency-booked tiakets. The third part of the study lakes into account the population, earnings and GDP from the catchment area to determine the macro evel size of enplanements generated in the market. The final adjusted results therefore produce more relevant data. Methodology Sixet Consulting Group has a three-pronged approach to determining the sze and characteristics of an airport's catchment area true market.The volume of Traffic at carrier destination detail that is currently captured at any airport is recorded in the Department of Transportation's Origin&Destnafan Survey-Th s data is analyzed and11, corrected to account for sampling errors and Carriers that do not participate in the survey. The characteristics at leaked traffic are then lilted from on aria yes of tickets sold by airlines serving the region that make settlement transactions through the Airline Reporting Corporation(ARC].This data is then eva:iafed to determine its fitness for inclusion in a representative sample to erad tale any outliers.The volume of.eaked traffic is determined by analyzing demographic and sotto-economic dales in the catchment area relative to regional and national tendencies.Ins is done using a proprietary basis for dissenvnoting and evaluating population,personal income, and gross domestic product far a defined catchment area Specific travet information is recorded an airline ticket stock retained by many airlines and sent 10 ARC far processing. Sixel Consulting Group. ttic. ISCGI staff collected prine ticket data from ARC-reporling airines serving the area and collected data of customers located in zip codes within the area. the information Collected included:originating airports destinations connect ng a rports.purchase dotes,departure and return dates,and airlines utilized. This date's analyzed to accomplish the objectives of the ticket t.iii Survey. I Proprietary analysis was=comet shed to determine travel on low cost carriers Such ce Southwest and Frontier. Whale ARC-report ng o rfines continue to book a significant portion of travel tow-cost carriers(such as Southwest, jet8lue,Frontier and Sun Country]and scheduled charter a,r ines such as A1teg ant]get the vast majorty of their bookings through company web porla s and do not settle transactions through ARC. Therefore. tickets purchased through these non•lradifianal channels are not collected in the traditional Ticket Lift Survey-or others based on travel agency sales. For This survey Sixel Consulting Group has esfmated leakage to low-cost carriers at arports throughout the region. By combining the Ticket Lift Survey information with information provided by the airlines to the 'U.S. Deportment of Transportation.SCG estimated the 'true marker for the local airport. The true market is the Iota number of air travelers,including those that are using a competing airport in the geographic area served by Wichita Fo Is Reg anal Airport. The"true market-estimate iecl,des the size of the total market.and can also be used to provide estimates for specitic destinations. page 3 PAGE 48 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F I Study Airports / Market Areas / Hubs Studied I5t1Jdy Airports SEW wicri io Falls Regional Airport ilig DEW Dolton Fort Worth International Airport OK,C will Rogers world Airport I CIA, Dallas Love Field t AW LOwlan-Ft Sill Regional Airport 1 Marktt Argos 111 Chicago ORD/MDW rDallas/Ft-Worth DEW/DAL Houston FAH/HOU London LHR/LGW Los Angeles Basin LAX/BUR/SNA/ONT/LG8 Moscow SVO/DME New York/Newark EWR/JFK/LGA/ISP/HPN INorfolk/Newport News ORE/PHF Orlando/Sanford MCO/SF5/LAL Panama City PEN/ECP IPa(6 COG/ORY Phoenix I Mesa NIX I A2A ■ Son Francisco Bay Area SFO/OAK/SJC ■ South Florida MIA/ELL/RBI South Texas MFE/WI_;PO Tampa/St,Pelersbi rg TPA I PIF Washington/Bo'timore DC.Pi/itWI/IAD Southwest Florida Hubs Studied Atlanta/Della Ft ICt,dCr;1, le/SUir t I Boston/American Houston 1 United Boston/1etBlJe Los Angeles/American Charlotte I Arr.erK:an Los Angeles/United 1 Chicago/American Miami 1 American Chicago/Soo wrest Minneopolis/Della Chicago/United Newark/United 1 Cleveland/United Philadelphia/American Dallas/American Phoenix/American Denver/Frontier Solt Lake City/Delta 1 Denver 1 Southwest San Francisco/United Denver/United Seattle/Alaska Detroit/Delta ..i. . ii ,F ,ti h,-.N.:40i c:,Ali1.!t. , ; i:•nil:i i',ills. ll-:r:ca PAGE 49 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Section 1: Passenger Analysis i Distance/Population Drive Time E,.k irs1 i ` r ..rr,rl, �- 5,,,1�r „_p�YYaweN9 •eWrererneA.Ae �Ma A/yLi - +r�ewA Siam emdr Q 80 MinusCS ( nA'n�+a .:y " raw i a.ne. f t 1 Ma u.,.. r1. f 1 4.1 /11 f 1 X Minutes it fi. ( uea. u�rwll• ,a ord effn�� Nra1 8wr•�Ic �• az owevwhr la,npl.w ,Idn I...ar} !. I a...wa: II tit, 0-9r,*tr"' . Ct.w►.s - `. 1 1 `T% i t3P8 �e��"'�,s Al/ qp - P kflkne {j s ar.e? n 1 Aki.1 C,Hw NMI. ...i MRely WSer e ..� ... ' R.e.—_Xr r H.P.Pro �--_ ..pay.} p t,wY.A iit N. Byrd 60.• �. el sue_ ..a A1- ..,I. • Approximately 142,093 residents live within a 30 minute drive of Wichita Falls Regional Airport. • Approximately 299.683 residents live within a 60 minute drive of Wichita Falls Regional Airport. • Approximately 430,176 residents live within a 90 minute drive of Wichita Falls Regional Airport. page S Vt,.......s PAGE 50 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F i Wichita Falls Airport's Study Catchment Area JStudy Area { 1 . 1 ...,_ I _. ...„,„ wtfl I IRank County Population Per.Income' Earnings' SPS Share 1 I Mills TX 30698 $4 636 734 $3,508,452 30.9% 2 Burnet.OK '25,815 $4 653 216 $3,760,861 31.3% 3 Bosque.OK 45.197 $1 733020 $1,156.131 10.8% I4 Comanche OK 26.447 $855.070 $644.42 i 5.9% 5 Mclennan.'X 19.719 $791.582 $316,239 4.2% I6 Wilborger TX 13 404 $463.394 $315,875 3.0% 7 Lampasas TX 10.721 $469 528 $162.456 2.3% I8 Bell.OK 9 416 $281 230 $129.439 1.7% 9 San Saba,TX 8 842 $403.985 $163.383 2.1% 1 10 Coryeil.OK 8061 $200.343 $91,339 1.3% Others 34.745 $r.087 499 $504,737 6.6': 1 Total 433.056 $15,575,601 510,758,333 100.0% 'Thousands PAGE 51 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Originating Airport for Wichita Fails Area Passengers True Market wart LCC Adjuslrnenl TOTAL li....•, r., ,... ,I:Yi A.y 1:.: .r,r. 1 Wlchlta Falls Regional Alrpcn 91,270 125 $256 9.2% 2 Dallas Fort Worth International Airport 343,090 470 $245 34.6% 3 Will Rogers World Airport 342,697 469 3213 34.5% 4 Dallas Love Field 109,852 150 6137 11 A% 5 Lawton-Fl Sill Regior,af Airport 105,730 145 6268 10,Yr/ Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Passengers True Market with LCC Adjustment•DOMESTIC ONLY LI .• 1 Wichita Falls Regional Airport 88,480 118 1228 9.5% 2 Dallas Fort Worth lrnertalsorlal Airport 290,184 308 $192 32.0% 3 Will Rogers World AirForl 320,503 439 $189 35.3% 4 Dallas Love Field 109,634 150 $137 12.1% 5 Lawtort-FI Sill Regional Airport 100,890 138 S242 11,1% ant V71 '.]'. =Ir" , Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Passengers True Markel vnlh LCC Adjustment•INTERNATIONAL ,,.. 1 Wichita Falls Regional Airport 4,810 7 $792 5.7% 2 Dallas Fore Worth international Airport 52,906 72 $539 52.4% 3 Will Rogers Wood Airport 22,194 30 S560 26.2% 4 Dallas Love Field 18 0 $555 0 0% 5 Lawlort•Ft Sit Regional Airport 4,840 7 seta 5.7% i..f: page 7 } 444.0 c.,,r,.,nMq:.o-.o,.,f PAGE 52 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Passengers True Market oath LCC Adjustment-TOTAL 10.7% 11.0% Wichita Falls El CM ■Dallas/Ft Worth Oklahoma City la Dallas Love Field � ■LdwtUn 1 34.5% Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Passengers True Market'Ath LCC Adiuslment•ToTAi. •Domestic s International SOO 450 • aoo r 350 >. 300 • 250 a zoo m • 150 11 11 • 100 50 Wichita Falls Deltas/Ft Worth Oklahoma City Dallas Love Field Lawton Page 8 4-law:c,,,,,n..,.a Q v..c in. PAGE 53 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Origination of Passengers in SPS Catchment Area by County Passengers by County 1 • �`J{�� rer. �Y rk r I [L.,.., Rank County Passengers Share Rank County Passengers Share 1 Wichita.IX 357 561 36.0% 11 Jefferson,OK 7,154 0.7% 2 Comanche,OK 338,537 34.1% 12 Cotton,OK 5,610 0.6% 3 Stephens,OK 88.618 8.9% 13 Greer.OK 4,553 0.5% 4 Jackson,OK 66 423 6.7% 14 Baylor,TX 4,553 0.5% 5 Montague,TX 44,390 4.5% 15 Knox,TX 3.089 0.3% 6 Wilbarger,TX 17 480 1.8% 16 Hordeman,TX 2,520 0.3% 7 Kiowa,OK 13 252 1.3% 17 Foord,TX 1,759 0.2% 8 Archer,TX 12.764 1.3% 18 Harmon,OK 1,220 0.1% 9 Clay,TX 12 764 1.3% 10 Tillman,OK 10,163 I.0% 0 0.0% Others Total 792,439 100.0% }i,t . page 9 }vice. Crow wr PAGE 54 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F I Origination of Passengers in SPS Catchment Area by City Passengers by City I .; „p^4 x.., . .x .- --..2^ - 4)- .. .• - 4,' *1 o 27-.,\-Q....__I Y CD -P„.:,,.. . --2,- ""„rya •w..Si. „�., .,,. 4. - ,. .. 7 : :a 1 , _Q. -+„ N � 4.. .. o- ._ u ..� IRank City Passengers Share Rank City Passengers Share 1 Wichita Falls,TX 296,098 29.8% 11 Forl Sill,OK 17,236 1.7% I 2 Lawton,OK 260,081 26.2% 12 Marlow,OK 16,992 1.7% 1 3 Duncan,OK 62.683 6.3% 13 Sheppard AFB.TX 13,740 1.4% 1 4 Allus,OK 59,593 6.0% 14 Henrietla,TX 9,837 1.0% 5 Burkburnett,TX 26,829 2.7% 15 t'locona,TX 9,268 0.9% 1 6 Elgin,OK 22,602 2.3% 16 Fletcher.OK 8.618 0.9% 7 Bowie,TX 18,211 1.8% 17 Frederick,OK 6,911 0.7% 1 8 Cache,OK 17,805 I.8% 18 Sainl Jo,TX 6,748 0.7% + 9 Iowa Park.TX 17,480 1 8% 19 Hobart.OK 6,423 0.6% 1 10 Vernon,TX 17,398 1.8% 20 Windthorsl,TX 4,797 0.5% Others 93.090 9,4% 1 Total 992,439 100.0% ., r page 10 ' lydcmr.on,rw6m.p Int PAGE 55 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Origination of Passengers in SPS Catchment Area by Zip Code Passengers by Zip Code I r � rxis, to ww rears i p'� L., - ...n�. `^wis, rrw,• ',, - ws: twee •'-',,.;,,,:r/ '•—r--_., (3 %,43.,,_„:,_ . . 1,C,!.... ki ..'-},—,-,,, 4-1 i x.. , / f.tt rua nnI .. I. r. l ` ...,I—F.;;;;)I r ` .._ei- r -a I� Tmop r i,.- i sr y . i I P.m -} y nw rr i ,- M 1 1' wn F +•u 4 I Rank Iip Code Passengers Share Rank Yip Code Passengers Share I 73505 138,699 14.0% 11 76354 26,829 2.7% 2 76308 87,886 8.9% 12 73538 22.602 2.3% 1 3 76310 76,260 7.7% 13 76301 20.813 2.1% 4 73507 74,472 7.5% 14 76230 18.211 1.8% 5 73533 59,187 6.0% 15 73527 17,805 1.8% 6 73521 57.805 5.8% 16 76367 17,480 1.8% 7 76309 40.407 4.1% S 7 73503 17.236 1.7% 8 73501 37.398 3.8% 18 73055 16.992 1.7% I 9 76306 28.537 2.9% 19 76384 15,610 1.6% 1il 10 76302 27.805 2.8% 20 76311 13,740 1.4% Others 176,667 17.8% Total 992.439 100.0% ckjY Page I I 1 WMrav Ha.9(....v i, PAGE 56 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F IRetention of Passengers at SPS by County IRetention by County I J - IH ...1.• .4. .. r ri ..,,,,..1\...L. N.c:._1 n I ..1,,,,....N...L........ , a M 1 1 Rank County Passengers Retention Rank County Passengers Retention IJ 1 Foarci,TX 1,789 54.5% II Comanche,OK 338.537 ')A% I 2 Wichita.TX 357.561 35.5% 12 Jackson.OK 66.423 2.6% 3 Wilbarger,TX 17,480 28.8% 13 Montague,TX 44.390 2.0% I4 Archer.TX 12,764 28.0% 14 Jefferson,OK 7.154 1.1% 5 Baylor,TX 4,553 26.8% 15 Kiowa,OK 13,252 0.6% I6 Clay,TX 12.764 24.2% 16 Stephens.OK 88,618 0.3% 7 Hardeman,TX 2,520 19.4% 17 Greer,OK 4,553 0.0% 1 8 Knox,IX 3.089 7.9% 18 Harmon,OK 1,220 0,0% 9 Tillman.OK 10.163 6.4% 1 10 Calton,OK 5,610 2.9% Others 0 1 Total 992,439 i.i , . F ciicrci'.;u[i ri •,•;i ri k. `y! ' i Page 1 x IZau.ssenwi G PAGE 57 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F True Market Passenger Dishlbullon at Wichita Falls o tire LJt �x. > Passenger Summary Destinations by market:Based on the analysis, the top five passenger markets tar the Wichita Falls area are Houston, Las Vegas,Denver.the tos Angeles Basin and Chicago. These five market areas comprise 25.0% of Wichita Falls area demand. with the 20 largest markets generating at least 18 passengers per day each way. Largest Destination: Based on the analysis, the largest true passenger market for the Wichita Falls area is Houston. The Wichita Falls area generated a total of 66.351 passengers in Twelve Months Ended September 2014 -91 PDEW to Houston, 3-6%of Wichita Fails area- Houston passengers use Wichita Falls Regional Airport while 8.9%use Dallas Fort Worth International Airport. Passenger Retention: Among the 50 largest true passenger markets, Wichita Falls Regional Airport retains the largest percentage of Wichita Falls area passengers to Dallas / Ft. Worth (59.6%). Pittsburgh,(32.2%)and Columbus(27.7%1. Wichita Falls Regional Airport retains the lowest number of area passengers to Lubbock(0.4%),Amarillo. (0.2%)and Bullhead City/Laughlin Passenger Retention:Among the 50 largest true passenger markets, Dallas Fart Worth International Airport captures the largest percentage of Wichita Falls area passengers to Cancun(78.5%),Boston, (57,9%)and South Florida(56.2%). Dallas Fort Worth International Airport captures the lowest number of area passengers to Raleigh/Durham(11.7%),Houston.(8.9%)and Dallas/Ft.Worth(0.0%). page 13 }atm! rvuo.►.1 PAGE 58 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F r 100 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets toffrom the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approv5mates 100%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers A''' i.MvIl'i SOS t,;,,keli Trot: 'fin, Avg Rot1k A.rpnrt Met,o Arca A,rI rt(!i PFIF INN POE-IN PDFW 08D Pat F:irc• 1 HouSIDn IAH I HpU 3.3 87 6 90.9 66 351 6150 2 Las Vegas LAS 3.1 67 3 76.4 51 395 $171 3 Denver DEN 1.9 625 54.4 47022 $118 4 Los Angeles Basin LAX:OUR/SNA I ONT/LOB 4-5 $4 5 59-0 43,055 $207 5 Chicago ORD I MOW 2.8 52 9 55.8 40 705 $167 6 Washington/Baltimore DCAIBWIIIAD 5.1 421 47.4 34.608 $226 7 San Francisco Bay Area SPOT OAK I SJC 1.9 40 1 42.0 30 666 $204 8 New York I Newark E WR I JFK I LOA I ISP I HPN 4,7 37 0 41.8 30.485 $240 9 Atlanta ATL 3-4 34 5 37.9 27.677 $179 10 Orlando I Sanford MCO 1 SOS I LAL 2.8 30 8 33.8 24 558 5173 11 Phoenix I Mesa PHX I ALA 2.9 29 7 32.8 23.804 $180 12 New Orleans MSY 0.8 29 3 30.1 21.942 $136 ' 13 South Florida MIA/FLL I PBI 1 9 25 1 27.0 19 741 $189 14 El Paso ELP 1.3 24 2 25,8 18.567 $176 15 Seattle lTewma SEA 2.4 214 23.8 17.339 5229 16 San Diego SAN 1 4 20 8 22.3 16.249 $200 17 5t Louis STL 1.5 18 4 19.9 14,527 $164 to Kansas City MCI 0.9 17 3 18.2 13 318 $163 19 AuStin AUS 1.5 16 7 18.2 13,316 $146 20 San Antonio SAT 2.0 160 18.0 13.105 $164 21 8oslon 805 1 2 16 4 17.5 12.814 $211 22 Phlladelphla PHL 2.2 14 5 18.7 12,207 $218 23 Cancun CUN 01 161 18.2 11,848 $233 24 Minneapolis MSP 1 5 13 7 15.3 11,139 5200 • 25 Charlotte CLT 1 5 13 4 15.0 10.914 $227 26 Tampa I St.Peiersbutg TPA r PIE 1.4 13 4 14.6 10,814 $183 27 Detroit DTW 1 2 12 2 13.4 9,798 5207 28 Mrdtand I Now MAF 0.2 11 5 11.0 8,600 5153 29 Lubbock LOB 0 0 11 4 11.4 8,362 5125 30 Nashville BNA 18 as 11.3 8,242 5191 31 Albuquerque ABO 48 94 10-1 7,402 5159 32 South Texas MFE I HRL 18t40 0 4 9 1 9.5 6.959 5161 33 Portend,OR PD7t 0 8 8 7 9.5 6,928 $210 34 Salt Lake City SLC 1 8 7 7 9.5 6,925 5208 35 Sacramento SMF 16 7.4 9.0 6.581 $240 36 Dallas/Ft.Worth DFW/SAL 4 7 3.2 7.9 5.770 $105 37 Amarillo AMA 00 7.9 7.9 5.744 $124 38 HVnlssille HSV 0.7 6 7 7.4 5,416 $284 39 Pitlsburnh PIT 2 4 5 0 7.3 5,335 $234 40 Bullhead City I Laughlin IF° 0 0 7 1 7.1 5.203 5224 41 Rene RN0 03 6.7 7.1 5.160 $218 42 Tulsa TUL 0 2 6.0 6,1 4.485 $95 43 Raleigh I Durham RDU 1 7 4 4 8.1 4,478 5224 44 Honolulu HNL. 0 8 5 2 0.9 4,310 $455 45 Columbus CMH 1 6 4 2 3.9 4.292 $210 46 Jacksonville JAX 1 0 4 9 5.9 4,283 $206 47 Norfolk/Newport News ORF I Pi4F 1 3 4.5 3.9 4,273 $236 48 Indianapolis IND 14 4.4 5.8 4.223 3193 49 San Juan SJIJ 0 3 5.2 5.6 4.057 $288 50 Little Rock LIT 1 0 4 4 5.4 3,936 $159 wnfinued on prrgo 15 •••1•- I•.I.:, I-,..+IS L':,.. ::i f.I -..1 ., I , -.1 I• . . Page II Murc,�..w•,.,; PAGE 59 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F 100 Largest True MD Passenger Markets ta1frorn the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample-DIrec lonai Journeyed Passengers n. . SPS t.v-,a,•a T,,,i, T.. L.-s A 1,,,'i V.•i,'.'Ar,.,. i i sw 'OEW PnrW .:dC P,n - 51 Charleston CMS 0.6 4.6 5.2 3,802 $217 52 Columbia CAE 0,9 4.3 6.2 3,776 $250 53 Birmingham SNM 0.7 4.5 5.2 3.771 $200 54 Cleveland CLE 1.i 3.9 5,1 1695 6221 5S London LIiR I LGW 0.5 4 4 4.8 3,536 $855 56 Southwest Florida RSW I PGD 0.3 4.5 4.a 3,489 3190 57 Fort Walton Beach VPS 14 3.3 4.7 3.423 $224 58 ki[waukee MIKE 0.5 4.1 4.4 3,372 S102 59 Richmond ROC 0.7 3.8 4.5 3,308 5247 60 Corpus Christi CRP 0.8 3,7 4.5 3,277 $167 61 San Jose❑e1 Cabo 5J0 0.0 4.0 4.0 2,937 $245 62 Savannah SAV 0.3 3.5 3.8 2.801 5271 63 Omaha OMA 1.0 2 7 3.7 2.714 $192 64 Mexico City HEX 0.1 3 5 3.8 2.598 S261 65 Anchorage ANC 0 7 2 7 3.4 2.482 5383 66 I'artf0rd 80L 1.0 2.2 3.2 2,366 $241 67 Louisville SOF 0.6 2 5 3.2 2,317 3202 68 Fayetteville FAY 0 3 2 6 3.2 2,305 5366 1 69 Pensacola PNS 0.8 2.4 3.2 2.302 5230 70 Cox woe! CM 0.0 3.0 3.0 2.218 5248 ` 71 Buffalo BUF 0 2 2.7 3.0 2,163 $230 I 72 Kahului OGG 0.0 2 9 3.0 2.182 $417 73 Tucson TUS 12 17 2.9 2,120 3250 74 Manila MNL 0.1 2.5 2.9 2,113 $948 75 Dayton DAY I 17 2.7 1,976 3202 76 Fresno FAT 0.5 2.1 2.7 1,946 3237 1 77 Frankfurt FRA 0.6 2.0 2-6 1,876 s888 78 Colorado Springs COS 0.0 1.6 2.5 1,851 3208 i 79 Seoul ICN 0-2 2.1 2.5 1,792 3f902 90 Memphis MEM 0.7 1.7 2.4 1.773 3203 C 81 Toronto YYZ 0.1 2.3 2.4 1,761 3318 I 82 Vancouver YVR 0.1 2.3 2.4 1,760 $334 83 Clndma8 CVG 0.5 1.8 2.4 1,741 5269 84 Grand Rapids GRR 0 7 1 7 2.4 1.721 5212 85 Spokane SEG 0.7 1.6 2.3 1,674 5295 86 Oklahoma City OKC 0 0 2.1 2.1 1,409 $103 87 Greenville 1 Spartanburg G5P 0 5 1.5 2.0 1.477 $214 i 86 Knoxville TYS 0.8 1.2 2.0 1.489 $215 89 0ee Moines DSM 03 1 7 2.0 1,447 5207 90 Wichita ICT 01 18 1.0 1.361 3115 91 Providence PVC 0.1 1.7 1.8 1,33a 5255 92 Syracuse SYR 0.3 15 1,8 1,335 3259 93 Greensboro GS0 0.2 1.6 1.8 1.304 $233 94 Boise 801 0.5 1.2 1,7 1.277 $205 95 Moulage Bay M8.2 0.0 1.7 1.7 1.266 3294 96 Puerto Vallarla PVR 0 1 1.6 1.7 1.255 5260 i 97 Manchester MKT 0.1 1.0 1.7 1,245 $251 88 Nassau NA$ 0.1 1.6 1.7 1,222 5291 90 St Thomas SIT 0.1 1.5 1.7 1.219 5294 100 Punta Cana PUJ 0.1 1.6 1.8 1.201 1339 1 t .1 I ,, PF r lr ., ....,. --, . -... . page I5 PAGE 60 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Airport Shares at Largest True O&D Markets to/from the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample Dtleckorial Journeyed Passengers Air DOr;M,,I;ii Ie SPS Other ,, Toe Tr,c True Avg liar.'" Allow!r,1c1,o A•,•,, PDEW P0EAr Prll:w ❑&Q Fax ItDliw Ireven,:e F.,rc . 1 Nouston 3,3 47,8 90.9 66,351 113,639 $9,035,581 $150 Houston Hobby 1.5 79.5 81.0 59,108 311.970 58,737.771 5148 Houston!AN 1 6 82 99 7,243 31,670 Si 218,8i0 $168 1 4 Los Angeles Basin 4.5 54-5 59.0 43,055 311,414 $6,697,035 3207 Los Angoras 22 36.5 38.7 28217 $7,794 35,889,644 $202 Orange County 13 9 9 11.3 8.221 $2,329 $1.700.460 $207 Ontario 0 9 4 7 5.6 4.090 $1,291 $942,174 5230 Burbank 0.0 32 3.2 2343 5703 3512.940 3210 1 Long Beech 0 0 0.2 0 2 175 371 $51 818 $296 5 Chicago 2.6 52.9 55,4 40,705 $9,336 $6,815,234 $167 Chicago Midway 0.0 32 1 32.1 23.447 $4,631 $3,380,,928 $144 Chicago 0144 e 2 8 20.8 23 6 17,256 34,705 $3,434,326 $199 6 Washington I Baltimore 5.3 42.1 47A 34,608 510,704 37,114,017 $226 Baflimore 1.7 242 25.9 18,935 55,108 33,728510 $197 Was/ungron National 2 3 12 0 14 3 10,462 $3.446 $2,515 888 $240 Washington Ouffe3 1 3 5.9 71 5,211 $2,150 51,569,530 $301 7 San Franclsco Say Area 1.9 48,1 42.0 30,566 58.560 $$,244,709 3204 Sori Francesco 1 4 22.4 23 8 17,364 $4,989 53,642.070 3210 0016nd 0.0 114 11.4 8,297 31,994 $1,455,512 3175 San Jose 0 5 6.4 8 9 5,005 31,577 51,151,128 3230 8 New York I Newark 4.7 37.0 41.5 30,485 510,033 17,324,415 1240 La Guardia .9 24.5 27 4 20.015 56,444 34,704.144 $235 Now York Newark 1.4 9,9 11 3 8,248 32,870 $2,095,455 3254 New York J F Kennedy u 3 1 8 2 1 1,559 3516 3376.409 $241 Ism 00 05 0.5 400 5117 385,074 5213 Whits Plains 0.1 0 3 0 4 263 587 $63,332 5241 10 Orlando'Salford 2.6 30.8 33.6 24,556 15,804 $4,237,062 $173 Orlando 2.8 296 32.4 23,685 55,718 14,173,892 $176 Sanford 00 17 12 872 387 363170 S72 11 Phoenix I Mesa 2.9 29.7 32.6 23,804 $5,685 34,296,391 $160 Phoenix 2.0 29.5 32.4 23.876 55,876 34,289212 $181 Mesa Calaway 0 0 0 2 0 2 128 $10 $7 179 556 13 South Florida 1.9 25.1 27.0 19,741 $5,117 63,735,210 $159 Fort Lauderdale 0 8 15 3 18 1 11,757 32,753 52,017 064 $172 Miami 0.7 76 83 6.035 31,800 51,314251 5218 Wear Palm Beach 0 4 2 2 2 7 1 949 3553 5493,895 $207 26 Tampa/St.Petersburg 1.1 13.4 14,6 10,614 $2,715 $1,082,019 $163 Tampa 14 13.4 14 8 10.874 $2,T15 51 982,019 S183 St.Petersburg 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 50 • page 16 1 UMW::.,1,0,.-q,;,Ow..r+ PAGE 61 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Airport Usage at S0 Largest True O&D Markets to(from the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months End4d September 2014 Appraxirnales 100%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers ,...ill{l,. S"! . .I J.• •..'41 '."''' 111.4.11:2,*+I Cny Twat' "DE Ni r"f1F"' Pr1W sn,lii' 060P.r 1 Houston 3.3 3.856 81 8.9% 36.1 39.7% 66,351 2 Las Vegas 3.1 4.4% 25.4 36.9% 35.0 49.8% 51,395 3 Denver 1.9 2.9% 15.9 24.7% 44.7 69.3% 47.022 1 4 Loa Angeles Basin 4.5 7.6% 24 5 41.5% 22.2 37.7% 43,055 • 5 Chicago 2.8 5.1% 9.3 18.6% 37.2 66.7% 48,705 6 Washington a Bellmore 5.3 11.2% 12.7 26.9% 18.3 38.6% 34,008 7 San FranCkSOO Bay Area 1.9 4.5% 19.1 45.6% 16.0 30.2% 30,68E 1 ' 6 New'York f Newark 4.7 11.3% 18.2 43.5% 12,8 30.7% 30,485 9 Abenia 3,4 9.0% 11.8 31.1% 18.4 48.7% 27,e77 10 Orlando/SaMord 2.8 8.4% 13.6 40.9% 11.9 35.5% 24,550 11 Phoenix I Mesa 2.9 9.0% 10.1 30.9% 14.9 45.6% 23,854 12 New Orleans 0.0 2.6% 9.8 32.7% 6.4 21 3% 21.942 13 Sough Flonda 1,9 7,2% 15.2 56.2% 5.3 19.5% 19,741 14 El Peso 1.3 5.2% 5.6 22,1% 4.5 17.5% 16.657 15 Sealtie f Taooma 2.4 10.094 14.5 48.55E 6.5 27.2% 17,338 16 San Diego 1.4 6.5% 9 8 44.0% 6.9 30.6% 18,24111 17 SI Louis 1.5 7.6% 3 4 17.0% 10.2 51.2% 14.627 18 Kansas City 0.9 5.1% 4 5 24.0% 6.9 37.9% 13.310 19 Austin 1.5 84% 3.7 20,3% 3.8 20.8% 13,316 20 San Antonio 2.0 10.9% 2 5 14.1% 4.5 24.6% 13,105 21 Boston 1.2 6.6% 10.2 57 9% 4.4 24.6% 12,814 22 Philadelphia 2.2 13.2% 62 49.3% 3.5 20.9% 12,207 23 Cancun 0.1 0.8% 12.7 78 5% 3.1 19.2% 11,846 24 Minneapolis 1.5 10.1% 8.1 52.9% 4.0 26.3% 11,139 25 Charlotte 1.6 10,3% 7,0 46.7% 3,9 26.4% 10,914 26 Tampa 1 SI,Petersburg 1,4 9.2% 8.3 42.1% 3.4 23.2% 10,014 27 Detroit 1.2 8.9% 5.8 43.6% 4.9 36.4% 0,790 28 Midland 1 Odessa 0.2 2.0% 2.3 10.7% 1.6 13.3% 5.800 29 Lubbock 0.0 0.4% 2 6 2,1 6% 1.7 14.9'74, 0.352 30 Nasimlle 1.8 15.11% 2.9 25.8% 3.0 26.5% 0.242 31 Albuquerque 0.8 7.7% 2.4 23.814 2.3 23.2% 7,402 32 South Texas 0.4 4.5% 1,2 12.7% 3.5 36.6% 6,959 33 Portland,OR 0.8 7.9% 4.4 48.7% 3.3 34.9% 6,926 34 Salt Lake City 1.8 19.1% 2 9 30.8% 3.9 40.7% 6.920 35 Sacramento 1.6 17.6% 2.2 24.8% 3.4 37.9% 6,581 36 Dal/as f Ft.Worth 4.7 59.6% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 5.770 37 Anode° 0.0 0.2% 2.1 28.1% 0.6 7.9% 5,744 38 Huntsville 0.7 10.0% 1.7 22.3% 2.4 32.1% 5,415 39 Pittsburgh 2.4 32.2'% 1.6 24.0% 1.8 24,0% 5,335 40 Bullhead City 1 Laughlin 0.0 0.0% 2.0 39.4% 3.6 49.8% 5.203 41 Reno 0.3 4.8% 3.0 41.9% 3.3 48.8% 5,165 42 T 4sa 0.2 2.7% 2,4 39.6% 0.8 102'rh, 4,485 43 Raleigh Durham 1.7 27.7% 0.7 11.7% 0.6 10.3% 4,470 44 Honnlutu 0.0 12.8% 3.0 51.2% 10 17.5% 4.310 45 Columbus 1.6 27 7% 1.4 23.7% 1.6 26.6% 4,292 46 Jacksonville 1.0 16 3% 2.1 36.7% 1.0 17.2% 4,283 47 Norfolk 1 Neriport News 1.3 22.9% 1.4 24.2% 12 19.8% 4,273 45 Indianapolis 1.4 23.9% 1.8 31.5% 0.8 14.3% 4.223 49 San Juan 0.3 6.2% 2.3 41.9% 1.9 34.1% 4,957 50 Little Rods 1.0 17 8% 1,1 21.0% 1.5 27.2% 3,934 i.i uv W06W'5hnlc . . . . . ., .:. paiesd wilt,page 16 PO9e)7 4-0.0 S.P6ialirp,Goe.gx Ply PAGE 62 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Airport Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Markets to./from the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample Directional Journeyed Passengers V Airport i Multiple Cast!,,.l one f said Laws n', I t,. t.,•", Aulturi►ob.oArea POESY Share PDEW Share Dee P„ 1 Houston 41.7 45.9% 17 1.9% 56,351 2 Las Vegas 4.4 6.3% 2 5 3.5% 51,395 • 3 Denver 1 2 1.9% 0 7 1.1% 47,022 4 Las Angeles Basin 1..4 2.3% 6 4 10.9% 43.055 5 Chicago 4.4 7.9% 2 0 3 6% 40,765 6 Washington/Baltimore 1.9 3.9% 9.2 19 4% 34,66E 7 San Francis-op Bay Area 1.9 4.8% 30 71% 30.446 8 New York/Newark 0.3 0.5% 5 8 13..8% 30,405 9 Allenta 1.1 2.8% 3.2 8.5% 27,877 10 Orlando/Sanford 2.1 6.3% 3 0 8.9% 24,538 11 Phoenx 1 Mesa 2.9 9.0% 1 8 5.5% 23,614 12 New OrtIans 12 2 40.7% 0 8 2 7% 21,942 13 South Florida 0.9 3.3% 3 7 13.0% 19,741 14 El Paso 9,1 35.8% 5 0 19.4% 10,657 15 Seattle 1 Teatime 0.0 0.2% 3 4 14,1% 17,331 16 San Diego 2.2 10.0% 1 9 8.7% 111,249 17 S1 Louis 3,4 17.3% 1 4 6.9% 14,527 18 Kansas City 4.9 26.6% 1 0 5 5% 13,316 19 Austin 8,3 45.7% 09 4.7% 13,318 20 Sen Antonio 5.3 29.5% 3.7 20.6% 13,106 21 Boston 0.0 0.0% 1 9 10.6% 12,614 22 Philadelphia 0 0 0.0% 2 8 16.6% 12,207 23 Cancun 00 00% 02 14% 11,444 24 Minneapolis 0.1 0.7% 1.5 10.1% 11,139 25 Charfarle 0.0 0.0% 2.5 18 71 10,914 26 Tampa r St.Petersburg 1.2 8.4% 2.5 16.7% 78,814 27 Detroit 0.0 00% 15 11.1% 9,798 28 Midland/Odessa 7.5 63.3% 0.2 1 7/. 5,600 ' 29 Lubbock 6.9 59.9% 0.0 0 4% 6,352 3D Nashviee 0.9 7 81e 2.7 24.1% 0,242 31 Albuquerque 4.1 40.8% 0.5 4.7% 7,402 32 South Texas 3.8 39.4% 0.6 6.8% 8,950 33 Portland,OR 0.2 1.9% 0.8 85% 5,924 34 Sall Lake City 0.0 0 2% 0.9 9.2% 8,925 35 Sacramento D.3 3.6% 1.5 16.1% 0,581 36 Dallas/Fl Minh 0.0 0.0% 3.2 49.4% 5,770 37 Amarillo 5-1 55.0% 0.1 09% 5,744 38 Huntsville 0 0 0 0% 2 6 35.6% 5,416 39 Pittsburgh D 0 0 2% 1-4 19.5% 5,335 40 Bullhead City 1 Laughlin 0.0 0.0% 08 108% 5,203 41 Reno 0.2 32% 02 3.3% 5,160 42 Tulsa 2.9 47 3% 0.0 0.0% 4.465 43 Raleigh 1 Durham 6.1 1.0% 3.0 49.4% 4,475 • 44 Honolulu 0.0 0..0% 11 18.8% 4,310 45 Columbus 0.1 1.3% 1.2 20.7% 4,292 46 Jacksonville 0.2 2.7% 1.6 27.1% 4,233 47 Norfolk 1 Newport News 0.0 0 5% 1.9 32.5% 4,273 48 Indianapolis 0 2 2.8% 1.6 27.5% 4,223 49 San Juan 0 1 2 1% 0,9 15.8% 4,057 50 Little Rock 1.5 27.7% 0.3 6.4% 3,130 Total Tin PDf6Y I Stine t i C, Paired WW1 page n �'C,1! .'P09e 18 wrr[,M,��„��a,...•o ,. PAGE 63 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Point of Origirt at 100 Largest True OW Markets to/from the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers A,:lu):� -I1111e �.:II:.L•..,:d C5,,t ,,,',,.' ,... - .,,....I r .. - 1 Houston 1A141140U 57.3 63.0% 33.6 37.8% 90.9 66,351 2 Las Vegas LAS 59.7 84.8% 10.7 15.2% 70.4 et.395 3 Denver DEN 35.4 55.0% 20.0 45.0% 64,4 47,022 4 Los Angeles Basin LAX r BUR 1 SNA.ONT 1 LGB 32.0 54.2% 27.0 45.8% 59.0 43,055 S Chicago ORDIMOW 20.6 51.3% 27.2 48,7% 55.8 44,705 6 Washington.'Bellmore DCA,SWl I IAD 25.5 53.84E 21.9 46.2% 47.4 34,808 7 San Francisco Bay Area SFO r OAK 1 SJC 24.9 59.3% 47,1 40.7% 42 0 30,004 8 New York:Newark EWR I JFK 1 LGA'ISP r HPN 21.6 52.3% 19.9 47.7% 41.8 30,413 9 Atlanta ATL 18.0 47.4% 19.9 52.6% 37 9 27,477 10 Orlando..Sanford MCO SFB/Lail 25.4 75.4% 8.3 24.6% 33 6 24,558 11 Phoenix r Mese PHX i A2A 18 7 57.3% 13.9 42.7% 32 6 23,404 12 New Orieens MSY 21 4 71.2% 6.6 26,8% 30.1 21,942 13 South Ronda MIA.r FLL I Pei 17,3 64.0% 9 7 36.0% 27.0 19,741 14 Er Paso ELP 15.4 60.4% 10 1 39.8% 25.6 18,637 15 Seattle,Tacoma SEA 13.1 55 0% 10.7 45.0% 23.8 17,339 16 Son Diego SAN 14.1 63.5% 6.1 36.5% 22.3 18,240 17 St Louis STL 11 5 57 8% 8.4 42.2% 79.9 14,527 18 Kansas City MCI 11.1 60 7% 7.2 39.3% 18.2 13,310 19 Austin AUS 11.3 62.0% 6.9 38.0% 18.2 13,316 20 San Anlonb SAT 11.9 66.1% 6.1 33.9% 18.0 13,105 21 Boston SOS 9.6 54.6% 6.0 45.4% 4 7.6 12,814 22 PhHadllphia PHI 7 9 47.2% 6.8 52.8% 16.7 12,207 23 Cancun CUN 14 5 89.2% 1.0 10.8% 76,2 11,140 24 Minneapolis MSP 6 9 45.3% 8.3 54.7% 15.3 11,120 25 Charlotte CLT 7.1 47.6% 7,8 52.4% 15.0 14,914 26 Tempe 1 Sl.Petersburg TPA I PIE 8 5 57.5% 8.3 42.5% 14 8 10,814 27 Ceiroil DTW 5.9 44,1% 7.5 55.9% 134 9,79E 28 Midland I Odessa MAF 0,1 69.0% 3.7 31,0% 11-8 6,600 29 Lubbock L5B 7.5 65.9% 3.9 34.1% 114 5,352 30 Nashville BNA 6.5 57.2% 4.8 42.8% 113 1,242. 31 Albuquerque A90 G a 67.1% 3.3 32.9% 10.1 7,402 32 South Texas MFE 1 HRL I SRO 5 6 58.6% 3.9 41.2% 0.5 4,969 33 Portland,OR PDX 5.0 52.2% 4.5 47.85'o 95 6,92e 34 Salt Lake City SLC 5.2 54.7% 4.3 45.3% 0 5 8,925 35 Sacramento SMF 4.3 48.0% 4.7 52.0% 9.0 0,551 36 Dallas!FL Worth DPW I DAL 4 0 50.6% 3.9 49.4% 7.9 5,770 37 Amarillo AMA 51 64.3% 2.8 35.7% 7.9 5,744 38 Huntsville HSV 3 6 48.6% 3.5 51.4% 7 4 5,416 39 Pittsburgh PIT 3.6 49.9% 3.7 50,1% 7.3 5,335 40 Bullhead City/Laughlin IF 36 51.1% 3.5 48.9% 7.1 5,203 41 Reno RNO 5 1 71.8% 2.0 28.2% 7 1 3,104 42 Tulsa TUL 3 6 58.4% 2.6 41,6% 6 1 4,486 43 Raleigh 1 GJrnam ROU 3 0 48.7% 3.1 51-3% 6 1 4,475 44 HonohUu HNL 46 78.3% 13 21.7% 5.9 4.310 45 Columbus CMH 2.9 49.5% 3 0 50.5% 5.9 4,202 46 Jarksonvdle JAX 3.2 55.0% 2.6 45.0% 5.9 4,283 47 Norfolk/Newport Na a ORF/PHF 2 9 49.0% 2 9 50.1% 5 9 4,273 48 IndlarraooIts INO 2.8 48.2% 3.0 51.8% 5.6 4,223 49 San Juan SJU 3.8 68,7% i.7 31.3% 5.6 4,057 50 Lino Rock LIT 3 3 80,6% 2.1 30.4% 5.4 3,93E calffnued on Faye 20 . .I ZiAU4z 19 PAGE 64 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F i Point of Origin at 100 Largest True O&D Markets toffrom the Wichita Falls Area 1 Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sam pre ❑ao:1iana4 Journeyed Passengers A,per;•hl coil Iph: Q,,[:n:•.,•,l D,itbo corm: Int+curia ..};u,.nn Trutt Tulip!R:r nt room Mcl,a Ai ea Ai pnrtta 1,LIE W Snarc POEW Sh.pri, PDEW OMd Pax 53 Charleston CMS 3.3 62 8% 1 9 37.2% 5 2 3,602 1 52 Oakum ma CAE2 7 51.9% 2 5 45.1°/ 5 2 3,770 53 Birmingham BHM 2.9 56 8% 2 2 43.2% 5 2 3,771 54 Cleveland CLE 2.4 47 6% 2 7 52.4% 5 1 3,605 55 Linden LHR/LGW 3.0 61 5% 1 9 36.5% 4 8 3,535 56 Southwest Florida RSW 1 PGO 3 2 660% 1 6 34.0% 4 8 3,489 57 Fort Walton Beaah VPS 3.7 750% 1 0 22.0% 4 7 3,423 50 Milwaukee MKE 2.3 49 5% 2.3 50.5% 4 8 3,372 59 Richmond RIC 2 2 48.4% 2 3 51.4% 4.5 3,308 y 60 Corpus Christi CRP 2 9 64.7% 1 6 35.3% 4.5 3,277 61 San Jose Del Cabo SJD 3.7 92.2% 0 3 7.8% 4.0 2,937 82 Savannah SAV 2 4 63 0% 1 4 37.0% 3.5 2,501 1 ' 63 Omaha OMA 1.8 48.9% 1.9 51.9% 3 7 2,774 r ' 64 Meeco City MEX 1.8 51.3% 1.7 48.7% 3.6 2,594 65 Anchorage ANC 2.0 57.5% 1.4 42.5% 3.4 2,402 66 Hartford BOIL 1 5 46.9% 1.7 53.1% 3 2 2,345 67 Loulsv9Ye SOF 17 53.6% 1.5 46.4% 3 2 2,317 111 68 Fayetteviue FAY 1 5 46.5% 1.7 53.5% 3 2 2,305 69 Pensacola PNS 2 1 65.4% 1.1 34.5% 3 2 2,302 70 Cozumel CZM 2 7 84.7% 0.3 11.3% 3 0 2,216 71 Buffalo BUF 15 49 1% 1,5 50.9% 3.0 2,183 Il 72 Kahului OGG 2 7 91.9% 0.2 8.1% 3.0 2,162 73 Tucson TUS 16 53.8°/ 1.3 46.4% 2.9 2,.120 74 Manila MNL 2.0 69.2% 0.9 30 5% 2.9 2,113 75 Payton DAY 1.2 44.0% 1.5 56.0% 2 7 1,976 11 76 Fresno FAT 1.3 48.5% 1.4 51.5% 2.7 1,946 77 FrankfurtFRA 1.5 56.0% 1.1 42.01 26 1.876 70 Colorado Springs COS 1.6 61.5% 1.0 38.5% 2 5 1,1154 79 Seoul ICN 1.2 48.8% 1.3 51.2% 2.5 1,792 I 80 Memphis MEM 1.3 54.4% 11 45.6% 24 1,773 81 Torenln YYZ 1.5 61.3% 0 9 38.7/ 2.4 1,761 82 Vancouver YVR 1.6 67.5% 0 8 32.5%. 2.4 1,760 83 Cincinnati CVG 10 43.5% 13 56.5°t 2.4 1,741 84 Grand Rapids GRR 1.1 44.6% 1 3 55.4% 2 4 1,721 85 Spokane GEG 12 50.9% 1.1 49.1% 23 1,674 86 Oklahoma City 0KC 1 4 68.6% 0.5 31.4% 2.1 1,440 87 Greenville I Spartanburg GSP 7 0 50.3% 1.0 49.7% 2.0 1,477 M 88 Knoxville TYS 19 51.2% 1.0 48.8% 2.0 1,489 89 Des Moines GSM 0 4 47.9% 1.0 52.1% 2.0 1,447 90 Wichita lGT 11 56.5% 06 43.5% 1.9 1,361 91 Providence PVC' 0.8 41.3% 1.1 56.7% 18 1,336 92 Syracuse SYR 0 9 49.0% 0.9 51.0% 1.8 1,335 93 Greensboro G80 0 S 50.1% 0.9 49.9% 1.8 1,304 ' 94 8o4se Bel 0 8 45.8% 0.9 54.2% 1 7 1,277 95 Montego Say MBJ 1 6 93.0% 0.1 7.0% 1.7 1,268 96 Puerto Vaiiarta PVR 1.6 91.9% 0.1 8.1% 1.7 1,255 97 Manchester MHT 0.7 39.3% 7.0 6a 7% 1.7 1,244 98 Nassau NAS I 91.6% 0.7 8.4% 1.7 1,222 99 Sl Thomas STT 1.5 88.8% 0.2 11.2% 1 7 1,219 700 Punta Cana PUJ 1 4 85.9% 0.2 14.1% 1.6 1,201 Total T.,n PDF W I Prince,nriern 546 40.2% 1 350 992.439 l m f Page 20 •.yserreewrr,arreWn•r.r PAGE 65 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Section 2: Revenue and Fare Analysis Average Fares at Top 25 Wichita Falls Area Markets ■Wichita Falls ■Dallas/Ft Worth ©Oklahoma City 50 $50 $100 5150 $200 5250 $300 $350 Houston Las Vegas _... . .. Denver 14.0 Los Angeles Bas n n Chicago ©N= Washington/Baltimore i0 San Francisco Bay Area ' Jp New York/Newark Atlanta ` Orlandof Sanford =' 11111 Phoenix/Mesa m ,1 New Orleanssue I . South Florida w i El Paso Seattle/Tacoma $11T San Diego N , St Louis mL 791 Kansas City r Austin r_- �m San Antonio Boston I fir© Philadelphia #21 Cancun 4" Minneapolis Charlotte _ t j page 21 c.ws.ywW,o PAGE 66 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F I 1 11 Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Revenue r■ True Marketvdth LCC Adjusinlenl.TDTAL J H...,..... Aupurl krrun•c SpewA•rrj F•,�rc S1rar.. Ir 'I Wichita Falls Regional Airport $23,562,821 $32,278 $258 10.5% J 2 Dallas Fort Worth international Airport $84,d9B.115 $115,203 5245 37.5% 3 WorldRogers 572,672,443 899.967 5212 32.8% 4 Dallas Love Field 815,001.966 $20,551 813A 5.7%.1 5 Lawton-FI Sill Replonal Airport $28,359,410 $313.862 5268 12.7% 1 n'.it WIcrr!,i r,al s Arc..RCvrruc $224.00.7.?55 53.3E 85C 1220 100.0', N I Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Revenue MTrue Market with LCC AdluNlment OOMESTIC ONLY Rank A,,rn' [Lnvrr.c,• RDEYA Any Fort: 5'ra,C .1 1 Wichita Fails Regional Airport $19,754,1988 $27,061 $228 11.3% 2 Dallas Fort Worth International Airport $55.5913,029 578,16i $192 31.7% II 3 Wili Rogers World Aaportt 860.538,001 $82.939 8189 34.5% 4 Dallas Lave Field 514.991,807 520,537 $137 8.8% 5 Lawton-Ft Sill Regional Airport $24,3E2,1319 $33,401 $242 13.9% 1 r",4r:hi:;:$'ails A;'."Dnr+e'u:H,.a•wc 5175 215 1.tii53 523C 0r59 5'93 100 1 Originating Airport for Wichita Fails Area Revenue True Market vnth LCC AWtusiment-INTERNATIONAL 1 Rnrk A;•rr:: . Rc nr'uc RDEYJ Avy F.rrn Shur,:' I Wichita Faits Regional Alrporl $3,808.623 $5,217 $792 7.8% 11 2 Dallas Fort Worth International Purport $28,501,287 *39.043 $539 54.5% 3 Will Rogers World Amor' $12,433,441 $17,032 5560 25 5% 4 Dallas Love Field $10,159 $14 $555 0.0% 1 5 Lawton-FI Sill Regional Airport $3,986,592 $5.461 3824 B 2 Wic rri Lr r:,ils Arun Intl Revs Wile 545 740 101 SEE.70. Sy7; 1CO 0 0 1 .. r u?tir I::11k'uri;•r'r.;l i.i:i)'Fi .. ;'l l'�: I n0la. r_...... Fl... „„, . pay 1.0 ow PAGE 67 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Originating Airport for Wichita Fails Area Revenue True Merkel with LCC Adlu5iment TOTAL IEEKI 10.5% ■Wichita Falls ✓Dallas/Ft Worth Oklahoma City EMI e Dallas Love Field 32.6%1 ■Lawton Originating Airport for Wichita Falls Area Revenue True Market with LCC Adiustnrent-TOTAL ■Pvmestic ■International 550,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 Sa0,00o $30,000 4(.9 II $20,000 $10,000 So Wichita Falls Dallas/Ft Worth Oklahoma City Dallas Love Field Lawton pogo 23Fxrrcw, . PAGE 68 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F True Market Revenue Distribution at Wichita Falls • r r Pt r , 0 Revenue Summary Destinations by market:Based an the analysis,the top five revenue markets for the Wichita Falls area are Houston, the Los Angeles Basin. Las Vegas, Washington / Baltimore and New York / Newark. These Five market areas comprise 19.1%of Wichita Falls area revenue,with the 20 largest markets generating at least$3.642 per day each way. Largest Destination:Based on the analysis,the largest true revenue market for the Wichita Fats area is Houston. The Wichita Falls area generated a total of $10.0 million in Twelve Months Ended September 2014-$13,639 RDCW to Houston. 4.0%of Wichita Falls area-Houston revenue is captured at Wichita Falls Regional Airport while 8.3%is captured at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport, Revenue Retention:Among the 50 largest true revenue markets,Wichita Falls Regional Airport retains the largest percentage of Wichita Falls area revenue to Raleigh 1 Durham 132.5%), Pittsburgh, (31,9%) and Anchorage(26.7%). Wichita Falls Regional Airport retains the lowest amount of area revenue to Cancun(0.8%),Lubbock,(0.7%)and Bullhead City/Laughlin(0.0%). Revenue Retention: Among the 50 largest true revenue markets. Dallas Fort Worth International Airport captures the largest percentage of Wichita Falls area revenue to Cancun (75.9%), Manila, (74.0%) and London (68.9%). Dallas Fad Worth International Airport captures the lowest amount of area revenue to South Texas(11.6%).San Antonio,(10.7%)and Houston(8.4%). -.. page 7� MA(on, �invcw..p ire PAGE 69 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F 100 Largest True O&D Revenue Markets toifrom the Wichita Falls Area i Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100',%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers A,Pn+r'M•,,pplr '.rig I IF ..',' -, I ',, , a Iv rnuur.Ar+:r A.u,..r, ,L,r,,. ,.%ti Rip c k.ki F,.. MAW AVu r 1 HOr151d1 IAH,HQU $398,820 $9.557.701 59,904,441 $13,639 1150 2 Los Angeles Basin Wit BUR 1 SNA I CNT 1 LO$ $696,030 58,201,005 $4,697,035 $12.188 $207 I 3 Las Vegas LAS 1464,870 58.302.133 $4,767,003 $12,010 $171 4 Washington.Baltimore DCA s BWI I IAD $1210,710 56,603,307 $7,114,017 $10.704 $226 5 New York I Newark EWR a JFK/LGA 1 ISP I HPN 5735,140 50,569,275 57,324,415 $10,033 $240 e C8lcago DRO/MDW 5392,230 58.423,024 14,015,214 19,336 5167 I 7 San Frandsrsl Bey Area 510'OAK I SIC 1303,340 $5.245.359 16,24 1,709 $8,560 5204 8 Derww DEN $273,070 $5,180,884 $6,462,954 $7,483 $116 9 Atlanta ATL 5459,720 $4,499,234 14,954,954 $6,793 $179 10 Phoeri 'Mesa PHX ALA 5435.620 53,860.771 54,266,391 $5,885 $180 I 11 Orlando i Sanford MCO I SFB 1 LAL $446,310 53,790.752 14,257,062 55,804 S173 12 Seattle'Tacoma SEA 5477.21P 13,500,680 $3,977,690 55,449 1229 13 Soul Florida MIA'FLL IP81 $290.040 53.445,170 $3,735,210 $5,117 $189 14 El Paso ELP $150,316 S3,138,293 $3,288,003 $4,505 $176 I 15 San Diego SAN $239,1160 13,004.559 53,244419 $4,444 5200 16 London LHR LGW 5253.560 $2,770,741 $3,024,302 $4,143 1855 17 New Orleans MSY $98,380 S2,688.833 12,987,213 14.092 5136 18 Cancun CON $22,970 $2,737,590 12,760.160 53,781 S233 I 19 Beaton 0CS $188,390 $2,514,363 12,700,753 53,700 5211 20 Philadelphia PHL 5453.740 S2,205,266 52,659,006 $3,642 $218 21 Charlotte CLT $226.360 S2,250,930 13,477,290 53.39.4 4227 22 Si Louis SR 1220,050 12,156.109 52.377,059 $3.256 5164 I 23 Mtnnoapolia MSP $210,430 $2,013.703 $2,232,223 $3.058 $200 24 Kern53 City MCI $120.160 52,055,153 12,174,343 $2.980 1163 r 25 San Antonio SAT $252,210 51.901,428 ;2,153,434 $2,950 $164 20 Detroit OTW 5173,900 $7,855,566 12,029,488 52.760 ;207 27 Manila MNL $30,640 11,972,693 52,003,533 12.746 1048 28 Tampa 1 SI.Petersburg TPA IPIE $200,070 Si 781,049 $1,962,019 $2.715 $183 29 Honolulu HNL $286,200 $1,072,857 11,959,057 52,684 $455 30 Austin AUS 5569,510 11,772 700 11,042,300 52.661 1146 31 Seoul ICH $97,560 11,518,540 11,616,100 $2,214 $902 32 Sacramento SMF 1376,290 $1203.154 51,579,444 52.164 5240 33 116415vale 8140 $221,460 11,350,668 $1,572,328 12,154 1101 34 Huntsville HSV $102,510 $1,435477 S1,S37,007 $2 107 $284 35 Portland,OR PDX $172,290 51,283,074 $1,455,345 $1 994 1210 36 Sall Lake City SLC 1289,760 $1,151,613 $1,441,373 11,974 3208 37 Midlanai Odessa MAC $32,950 $1.205,622 ;1,316,572 $1,806 $153 38 Frankhat FRA 5294,900 1985,840 $1,294,740 11,708 5688 39 Pittsburgh PIT $308,400 1648,787 $1,247,197 11.708 $234 40 Albuquerque ASO $112,070 $1,064.426 $1,176,4911 51,612 $159 41 Bullhead City/Laughlin 'FP ;0 S1.164,861 51,104,501 51.595 $224 42 Peso RHO 152.1350 $1,070,596 $1.123,446 51.539 $218 43 South,Texas MFE/HRL 1 BRO $61,810 $1,057 541 51.119,351 $1.533 $161 44 Tokyo NRT 171,950 $1,037,640 11,109,500 51,520 51,137 45 Nariolk 1 Newport News ORf 1 PHF $267,320 $826,405 51,093,725 $1,408 $256 46 San Juan SJU $82,560 $998,501 $1,631,001 $1,451 5206 47 Lubbock LBB $7,400 $1.033.659 11,041,059 $1,426 $125 48 Raleigh 1 Durham ROU $326,870 $878,148 11,095,016 $1.377 5224 I49 Osaka OKA $222.190 5735,015 $957,205 $1,311 $1.244 50 Anchorage ANC $254,430 1697,509 1951,940 11.304 $363 Con timed on paQa 28 IC . page 25 tr PAGE 70 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F f p I 100 Largest True O&D Revenue Markets tolfrorn the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 1 Approximates 100°%:Semple DwecUonal Journeyed Passengers Ri1+k Avd•:•�''vs,c+p.•, A,r p.••r,,.,, C%51y 8e Os.)co,. J8.0 P.., PDLA A..,e..ve 51 GaaalNa CAP $135.490 $808846 $944,335 51.294 $250 I 52 Pans COG'ORY 5151 500 $777 779 5929,289 $1,273 5825 53 Kahului OGG S20 600 $888.383 $904,943 $1,245 $417 i 54 Co1urnbus CMH 5223,070 ;157650 $678 250 1101,320 34ef,369 $1,235 $210 55 JadrSonvIte JA% $733.510 51.221 $208 I 56 Fayetteville FAY $117,100 $732 313 $849,413 $1.164 $368 57 Char1ee1on CHS 5153.540 5670,895 $424,436 $1 129 $217 ' 56 Richmond RIC 5102.030 $715,953 $517.983 51 121 $247 59 Cleveland CLE 5152.910 $663090 1816,000 $1,118 $221 I 60 Indlenapoils 1ND S170,850 5645.144 $815,794 $1118 $193 61 Fort wean Heed' VPS $316.510 $440,834 5756,344 31,050 $224 62 Savannah SAV 581 200 5878,427 5759,827 31.041 5271 63 Birmingham OHM $106.790 $646.145 1752,e38 $1.031 $200 I 64 San Jose Del Cabo SJD $7,810 $710,706 5718 516 $8e4 $245 65 Saigon SON $873,497 3717,797 5983 $681 66 Amarillo AMA $2,170 $711,556 $713,728 5975 5124 67 %•xl o City MEX $14,830 $062,758 $677,584 $928 $26i I 69 Belling PEK $01,250 51309,720 1470,071 $919 $997 69 Munich Al VC $18.700 5649,173 3665,673 $912 $841 70 Southwest Florida RSW/PGD $44,140 5617,779 58e1,919 $907 5190 1 71 Shan01ial AVG 591,510 $564.391 5555,901 5898 51,026 I 72 Milwaukee MKE $83.200 $564,777 1547,077 5888 $192 73 Little Rock LIT 5165,980 $459,201 5525,181 $856 $159 i 74 T I Aviv TLV $9.230 $604,383 $513,613 $841 $1,283 1 I 75 Dallas;Pt Worth DEW,DAL $319,520 5291,020 5010,840 5836 5106 75 Roma ECG $177,150 $422,593 5599,753 $822 $711 77 Vancouver YVR $32.640 $554,953 $537,593 $805 5334 II 76 Hartford SDL $T97.$50 $371,712 $589,562 5780 $241 . 79 Joh8nne$Lur9 Jilt $15,330 $518,404 5383.734 $772 $1.164 80 Toronto YYI 527.070 1533,188 $550,250 $767 $318 81 Cozumel CZM 50 $549,578 $549,578 5753 5246 82 Tucson TUS 5210.400 3319.747 $530,147 5726 $250 • I_ 83 Pensaceuta PN5 $158,690 $361,278 $529,968 2726 5230 I 54 Omaha DMA $154,020 $365,734 $519,754 5712 $192 85 Carpus Chn5ti CRP $85,060 $428.918 $513,978 $704 $157 I 66 Buffalo BUF $48.810 $454,167 $502,977 $689 $230 67 Amsterdam AMS $111,430 5391.491 $502,921 5669 5869 I 88 Spokane DEG ;222,070 54,620 3272,211 5494.281 $t91 $677 ;296 69 Dublin DUO $466.665 Z85 $673 $600 90 Louisville SDF 576.290 $391,178 $487A88 5640 $202 1 91 Hong Kong HKG 114,040 5450.873 $484,913 $637 S1,364 92 Dubai DX 510,390 $453.439 $463,430 $635 $1,206 93 Fresno FAT $91 700 $366.667 $480,357 $631 $237 94 Gir,dnnali CMG $89,620 $361,006 $4841.925 $618 $259 95 Calgary YYC $36,050 $413,498 $449,548 $616 $380 1 96 Taipei TP$ 531,540 $413,151 3414,791 3609 $909 97 Fairbanks FA! 568,670 $371,777 $440,447 $803 $474 98 Tulsa TUL $18 580 $408,688 5425,488 1563 395 99 Sao Paulo GRU $16.000 $403,970 5415,070 5575 $888 100 Delhi DEL 50 $415,080 $415,080 $562 $966 • 1 i;,1, l....f.,; .•:f.Ya4 w' a.,�7.ir„ __ 523.LL:LI_1 3300,441 934 5224004,755 53in 635 c<:G page 26 1 PAGE 71 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Airport Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Revenue Markets to/from the Wichita Fails Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample•Dlrecllonel Journeyed Passengers I;.,I,....I......, .. ...... I.I.I.4 , 4..,11".I•I',Sr r',a,,,, IfLorW '0,.. Id[1E', 1e,. I:i'f d+' .,, 1 Houston $546 4.0% $1,138 8.4% 55.702 41.8% 59,958.581 2 Los Angeles Basks $953 7.8% $4,742 38,9% $4.785 39.3% S6,897.935 3 Lae Vegas $637 5.3% $4.062 33.8% $6.201 51.6% 58,787.003 4 Washington I Baltimore $1.659 15.5% 12,609 26.3% $3,724 34.8% $7,814,017 S New York 1 Newark $1,007 10.0% $4.816 48.0% 52,908 28.0% $7,324,415 6 Chicago 5537 5.B% 51.784 18.9% $5.954 63.7% $6.615,254 7 San Frandaco Bay Area $416 4.9% 53.659 42.8% $3,507 41.0% 18,248,799 8 Denver 5374 5.0% $1.924 25.7% $4.862 65.0% 65.442,454 9 Adana' $630 9.3% $2,231 32.9% $3,091 45.5% $4,958,946 10 Phoenix I Mesa $597 10.1% $1,794 30.5% $2.686 45.6% $4.298,391 11 Orlando/Sanford 5611 10.5% 52.290 39.5% $2,012 34.7% 44,237,042 12 Seat*/Tacoma S654 12.0% S2.423 44.5% $1,405 25.8% $3.977,690 13 South Florida 5397 7.8% $2 671 52 2% $1.184 23.1% $3.735,210 14 El Paso $206 4.6% $902 20.0% 5962 21.3% 13,260,603 15 San Dlega $329 7.4% $1,880 41.9% $1.376 31.0% 53,244,419 16 London $347 8.4% $2,854 88.9% $637 15.4% $3,024,302 17 NewO#eana 5135 3.3% $1,567 20.1% 51.255 30.7% $2,987,213 18 Cancun 531 0.8% 52,669 75.9% 1516 21.6% 52,780,180 19 Boston 5255 6.9% 51,970 53.3% $1,031 279% 52,700,781 20 Philadelphia $622 17.1% $1,534 42 1% 5884 24.3% $2,859,006 21 Charlotte $310 9.1% $1,741 51311,, $806 23.8% $2,477,290 22 31 Louis 1303 8.3% 1566 17 4% $1,518 48.6% $2,377,059 23 Minneapolis 5299 0.8% $1,519 49.7% 5942 30.8% S2,232,223 24 Kansas City 5165 5.5% $598 20.1% S1.361 45.7% 52,175,343 25 San Antonin $345 11.7% $316 10.7% $814 27.6% 12,153,638 26 Delrolt $238 13.6% S1,168 42.0%, $1,070 38.5% 12,029,480 27 Manila 542 1.5% $2.030 74 0% 5659 24.0% 52.003,533 28 Tempel St.Petersburg $274 10.1% 51.042 38.4% $732 27.0% 91,962,019 29 H%nohlu S392 14.6% $1,224 45.8% 5481 17.9% 51,959,057 30 Asslin 5232 8.7% 5483 18.1% $055 24.6% $1,942,300 31 Seoul $134 6.0% 5851 38.5% 1376 17.1% 51,616,100 32 Sacramento $515 23.8% 5516 23.9% $739 34.1% $1,579,444 33 Nashville 5303 14.1% 5533 24.7% 5649 30.1% 51,572,328 34 Huntsville $140 6.7% $416 19.8% 5642 30.5% $1,537,987 35 Portland,OR $238 11.8% 5856 42.9% $684 34.3% 51,455,315 36 Salt Laka City $397 20.1% $615 31.2% $750 38.0% $1,441,373 37 Ml5Iend/Odessa $45 2.5% $355 19.7% $307 17.0% $1,318,572 38 Frankfurt 5404 22.8% 5642 36.3% $287 16.2% 51.290.744 39 Pllteburgh $546 31,9% $408 23.9% 5438 25.7% 11,247,147 40 Albuquerque $154 9.5% 5358 22.24r. S447 27.7% $1,176,498 41 Bullhead City/Laughiin 50 0.0% $757 47.5% $712 44.6% $1,164,861 42 Rena $72 4.7% $608 39.5% $765 49.7% 51,123,440 43 South Texas $55 5.5% $177 11.6% $685 44.7% 11,119,351 44 Tokyo 599 6.5% $983 64.7% $249 16.4% $1,109,590 45 Norfolk 7 Nanoort News $366 24,4% 6332 22.2% $293 19.8% $1,093,725 46 San Juan 5113 7.644 $608 41.1% $474 32.0% $1,661,061 47 LubbOok $10 0.7% 5362 25.4% $267 18.7% $1,841,049 48 Raielgh/Durham 5448 32,5% $159 11.6% $155 11.3% 51,006,916 49 Osaka 5304 23.2% 5532 40.6% $104 7.9% $257,205 50 Anchorage 4349 26.7% 5401 30.8% $363 27.8% $451,940 paired wlJM page 28 page 27 1,I•AIPor..r,.,.waw.,. PAGE 72 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F f fil Airport Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Revenue Markets to from the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approxrmalea 100%Sample-Medicinal Journeyed Passengers n.ry;yrr;Mi.,!.r+le Da al.as 1 r�wr F.mh1 L.rnlu,+ {qr:d Iji k.iiit A.�ra.�.r l i..Aril.r r.F'Nr SIr.irc P0tW Suaire O�y,6 R.r 1 l'aialon i;.930 43.5% 2323 2.4% $9,956,561 2 Los Angeles Basin 2200 1-6% ;1,507 12 4°/° ,�7,035 ri 3 Las Vegas saes 4.9% 1521 4 3% ;8.767,003 1 4 Washington Baltimore 5256 2.4% $2,256 21 1% $7,614,017 I 5 New York/Newark $45 0.4% $1,259 12.5% $7,324,445 I 6 Chicago 1668 7 2% $417 4.5Yr $6,515,254 7 Son Francisco bay Area $352 4.1% 2628 7.3% $6,246,709 8 Denver $150 2.0% St73 2.3% $5,462,954 9 Manila $173 2.6% $667 9 6% $4,968,954 bp 10 Phoenix A Mesa $387 6.6% $421 7.1% $4,296,391 11 Orlando/Sanford $288 5.0% 5803 10_4°/. $4,237,062 12 Seattle 1 Tacoma $5 Q.1 4 $952 17.6% $3,977,650 13 5nu1hFtorida $118 2.3% $747 146% $3.735,210 I 14 El Paso :1,388 30.8% 57,048 23.3°/. $3,266,603 15 SaFIDiego $324 7.3% $556 12.5% $3,244,419 16 London $0 CLOY. $305 7 4% $3,024,302 17 Now Odearrs $1.468 35.9% $168 4 1% $2,937,213 I 16 Cenan $0 0.01 $64 1.7°l0 $7,75e,160 19 Boston $0 0.0% ;494 12.0% $2,700,753 20 Pl4leddphta SO 0.0% $603 16.6% 52,059,006 21 Charlotte SO 0.0% $536 15.8% $2,477,290 1 22 Si Louts $556 17.1% $311 96% $2,377,059 23 Iu5nneepolls $17 0.5% $281 9.2% $2,232,223 24 Kansas City $652 21.9% $206 6.9% $2,175,343 25 San Mlonio $669 22,7% $806 27.3% $2.163,636 I 26 Detroit $0 50 0.0% 5.'104 10.9% 52,029,468 27 Manila 0.0% $13 0.5% $2,003,533 28 Tampa I Si,Petersburg 5173 6 4 k $494 18.2% $1,982,019 29 Honolulu S0 0 D.A. $586 21.8% $1,959,057 I 30 Austin S'.131 42.5% $161I B.0°/o ;1,942,369 31 Seoul $0 0.0% SB5f 36.4% $1,016,100 32 Sacra men Io $54 2 5% $339 15.7°/e $1,579,444 33 Nashville 5122 5.6% $548 25.4% $1,572,325 I 34 Huntevine $D 0.0% $908 43.1% ;1,537,967 35 Portland,OR S26 1.4% $191 8.6% 51.455,385 36 Salt Lake City 14 0 2% $209 10.6% $1,411,373 37 Mid Land(Odessa 51.059 58.6% $40 2.2% $1,318,672 I 38 FrenkluA $0 0.0% 5435 24.8% $7,290,740 39 Pittsburgh 53 02% 5314 18.4k $1,247,187 40 Albuquerque 1566 35 1% $87 5 4% $1,176,496 41 Bullhead City I Laughlin SO 0 0% $127 79% $1,164,661 1 42 Rene $36 2.3% $58 3.8°/, $1,IZ3,446 43 South Texas 1467 30 4°°/: $119 7.8°Io- $1,119,351 44 Tokyo 50 0.0% $189 12.4% $1,109,590 45 Norfolk I Newport Nears $6 0.4% $501 33.5% $1,093,725 7 46 San Juan 519 1.3/ $267 1 13. 0% $1,061,061 47 Lubbock 5760 54.7% $8 0.9% $1,041,059 48 Raleigh/Durham 110 0.7% $604 43.9% $1,005,015' I 49 Osaka S0 0 0% $371 28.3% $957,205 50 Anchorage S0 0 0% 1191 14 7% 5951,940 ITotal T1.4,12 RDEW 1st+.arc $20.55I r. 1 5 el;: 1' ' $!J4• 04 755 paired w1Ur page 27 page 28 1 PAGE 73 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Avg Fares by Airport at 50 Largest True O&D Markets to/rom the Wichita.Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sipe-Directional Journeyed Passengers • .,'ta• t rTn r..I i,t'n4 r,F:,.,.' I� iW1,11,:r I,r City Tai.n R.n'' A''AI'•'t•A.i.1,1.,n,,., 1., I",. r"'F�r Y/ Avn F r.,r Wi•!-LN Avtl F.i,.• PL EW A,r,F,,,,: t Nouelon 5168 3.3 $141 5,1 5158 36.1 $150 2 Las Vegas $207 3.1 $160 25.4 $177 35.0 5171 3 Denver $198 1.9 $127 15.9 $109 44.7 $116 4 Loa Angeles Basin $213 4.5 $194 24.5 $215 22.2 5207 5 Chicago 1189 2.8 $190 9.3 $160 37.2 $107 6 Washington+Baltimore $372 6.3 S221 12.7 $203 18.3 5226 7 San Francisco Bay Area $218 1.9 5191 10.1 $219 16.0 $204 8 New York I Newark $213 4.7 $265 18.2 $226 12.8 $240 ' 9 Atlanta $111.; 3.4 $189 11.8 $168 18.4 $179 10 O+tendo1Sanford $7.76 28 $166 13.8 $189 11.9 5173 11 Phoenix/Mesa $204 2.9 $178 10.1 $181 14.0 $180 12 New Orleans $173 0.8 S108 9.8 $198 6.4 $196 13 South Florida $204 1 9 $176 15.2 $224 5.3 $189 14 El Peso $155 1.3 $168 5.8 $215 4.5 $178 15 Seatte/Tacoma 5276 2.4 $210 11.5 $217 6.5 $229 16 San Diego $228 1.4 $190 9.8 $201 6.9 $200 ' 17 St Louis $199 1.5 $167 3.4 $149 10.2 $144 18 Kansas City 5177 0.9 5133 4.5 $197 6.9 $163 19 Austin $151 1.5 $130 3.7 $172 3.8 $146 20 San Antonia $176 2,0 6125 2.5 $182 4.5 $164 21 Bp5tan 5219 1.2 $194 10.2 1236 4.4 5211 22 Philadelphia $262 2.2 $188 8.2 3252 3.5 5218 23 Cancun 5230 0.1 $225 12.7 5282 3.1 $233 24 Miiveapotis $195 1.5 $188 8.1 5234 4.0 8280 25 Charlene S202 1.5 $250 7.0 $204 3A $227 25 Tampa/St.Patersburg $201 1 4 sloe 6.3 $213 3.4 $183 27 petrol $200 1.2 $200 5,8 $219 4,9 $207 28 Midland I Odessa S194 0.2 $153 2.3 1197 1.6 $153 29 Lubbock S247 0,0 $129 2.8 $157 1.7 1125 30 Nashville $170 1.8 $163 2.9 $217 3.0 $191 31 Albuquerque $197 0.8 6150 2,4 $190 2.3 $159 32 South Texas $193 0.4 $145 12 $196 3.5 3161 33 Portland.OR 5313 0.8 5193 4.4 $206 3.3 $210 34 Salt Lake City $220 1.8 $210 2.9 3194 3.9 $205 35 Sacramento $324 1 6 $231 2.2 $216 3.4 $240 36 Daum l Ft.Worth $93 4.7 $0 0.0 50 0.0 $106 37 Amadtlo 5217 0.0 $131 2.1 5177 0.6 $124 3$ Huntsville $190 0.7 $251 1,7 5270 2.4 $254 30 Pittsburgh $232 2 4 $232 1.8 $240 1.8 $234 40 Bullhead City I Lauchlin $0 0.0 $269 2.8 $201 3,6 $224 41 Rerto 5211 0.3 $205 3_0 5231 3.3 $218 42 Tulsa $155 0.2 $107 2A $0 0.6 $95 43 Raleigh 1 Durham $264 1 7 $223 0.7 3246 0.6 $224 44 Honolulu $520 0 8 3405 3.0 $487 1.0 $455 • 45 Columbus $187 1.6 $197 1.4 $242 1.6 $210 46 Jacksonville $226 1.0 $209 2.1 $229 1.0 $206 47 Norldlr/Newport News $273 1 3 5234 1.4 3253 1,2 5364 4B Pullen/polls $169 1.4 $202 1,0 $224 0.8 $193 49 San Juan 5330 0.3 $201 2.3 $250 1.9 $266 50 Lime Rods 5237 1.0 $119 1 1 $176 1.5 $159 A. r rl, F.,. a[lEly •, 7 - .. 62:1i paired with page 30 pegs 24 co-,w+.grw,r oft PAGE 74 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F s 11 Avg Fares by Airport at 50 Largest True 08D Markets toffrom the Wichita Falls Area il Twelve Months Ended September 2014 ayproskrra[es 1009.Sample Directional Journeyed Passengers A,l*:rrl MOr I1n IC 03IIj I U.e,I ,•:.I 4.ewPP-ra 1,•.., Rank AA,part Mrlro Ai'. Avc F lee. P�L'ry Avg F,i rn PC]EW h�q 6:,rr I Houston $142 41 7 3169 !7 Viso 2 Las Vegas $733 4 4 $210 2 5 $171 I: 3 Denver $120 1 2 $253 0 7 $116 4 ins Angeles Sarin 5146 1 4 $234 64 $207 Chicago $151 4 4 $206 2 0 2167 I 6 Washington;64I9m0re $137 1 9 $246 9-2 $226 7 San Francisco Bay Area $181 1 9 $210 30 $204 8 New York 1 Newark 5175 0 3 $218 5.8 $240 9 Manta 2164 11 $207 3.2 $179 I 10 Orlando Sanford $136 21 3201 3.0 $173 11 Phoenikl Masa $132 29 2238 1 6 $180 12 New Orleans $120 12 2 $208 0 8 St 36 13 South Florida $131 0.9 2200 3.7 $159 1 14 El Paso 5152 9 1 5211 50 $174 15 Seattle F Tacoma $150 0 0 $287 3 4 5220 15 San Diego $145 2 2 $286 1.9 $200 17 Sl Lois 9163 3 4 2227 1.4 9164 I 18 Kansas City $133 4 9 $242 1.0 $183 19 Austin 5136 6 3 1185 6 9 $148 20 San Antonio 2126 5.3 2216 3.7 2154 21 Boslon 10 0 0 $238 1.9 $211 I 22 Philadelphia $D 0 0 5217 2.8 3218 23 Cancun $0 0 0 5274 0.2 $233 24 Minneapolis 5157 01 2183 15 2200 25 C1141401te SO 00 2215 2,5 $227 I 26 Tampa f St.Petersburg $139 1.2 5199 2.5 Sip] 27 DelimitSO 0.0 $204 1.5 $207 28 Midland/Odessa $142 7.5 5193 0.2 5153 20 Lubbock 2114 6.9 2194 0.0 5125 I 30 Nashddle $139 09 $201 2-7 9191 31 Albuquerque $137 4.1 $182 0.5 9159 32 South Texas 9124 3.8 $186 0.5 $151 It 33 Portland,OR $153 0.2 2238 0 8 $210 I 34 Salt Lake City S157 0,0 5238 0.92208 35 Saaamanto S156 0.3 $233 1.5 $240 35 Dallas/Ft.Worth 20 00 2125 3.2 5106 37 Amarillo 5113 51 $238 01 $124 38 Huntsville S0 0.0 $344 2.6 2264 I 39 Pittsburgh $175 0.0 5220 1.4 5234 40 Bullhead City/Laughlbl $0 00 $185 0,8 $224 41 Rene 5160 0.2 5250 0.2 2218 1 42 Tulsa 5101 2 9 50 0.0 S95 43 Raleigh f Durham 5164 0.1 5200 3.0 $224 44 Honolulu 20 00 2535 1,1 $455 45 Columbus $159 01 2218 1.2 $210 1 46 Jacksonville 5152 0.2 $189 16 2206 47 Norfolk/Newparl News 2183 0.0 $263 1 9 5256 48 Indianapolis 5142 0.2 $194 1.8 2193 49 San Juan 5165 0 1 $305 0.9 $255 1 50 Little Rock 4107 1.5 $219 0.3 $159 Avn•+nc Tr.rr•t.I., 1r•ILW Sr'- _2E.h f 44 7.1 d225 1 paved with page 29 page 30Yv.� PAGE 75 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Section 3: Air Carrier Analysis I Airline Share at Top 50 Wichita Falls Area Markets •American Southwest Delta I united ■Spirit Frontier Others 0% 10% 20% 3094 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Houston 80.7% Las Vegas 435% Deriver 3S 3% , ,..+' �_.-,2 S%k • -.. . Los Angeles Basin 16.9% 4 441i; 4,5% Chicago 55 S% Washington/Baltimore _.. 25.3% San Francisco Bay Area 23 8% New York 1 Newark R Atlanta : Orlando/Sanford 70.4% ,Ii. Phoenix/Mesa 42.4% sl [," New Orleans 53 9% South Florida 7 3% 7.4%%,I :1 El Paso 44 5% Seattle/Tacoma i 7.0% 1i 7% _t♦,Z% San Diego 25 1% 5:3% St Louis 58.9% Kansas City 5g 9% Austin 59.5% Sap Antonio 45 8% Boston 6 9% qK 5,'7%'L47'i Phiiadelphla lir.... 4 "4" Cancun Mal neapoln; ® '. .,s, - Charlotte Tampa I St.Petersburg �..�� "'ti Detroit al% 14 •,4p.r __, gaa Midland/Odessa 73 0% Lubbock 705% Nashville 206„ .�_ M Albuquerque 52 0% South Texas 68 7% Portland,OR 13 3% a 7.0Js F ftfx • _. Salt Lake City Sacramento 25 4% Dallas/Ft.Worth i Amarillo 68 2% Huntsville 4_, 2;..-;. ..... Pittsburgh Bullhead City I Laughlin Reno 33.0% Tulsa 52 7% ' Raleigh/Durham 4,5%S.0%' Honolulu • I Columbus Jacksonville 9 Norfolk/Newport News M 14. i p Indianapolis San Juan 7.6% L1.0%;, .. Little Rock 40.6% f1n' page 31 PAGE 76 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F ,'r:.i• I r.•:;I t.:.1c. I. i, 1 Originating Airline for Wichita Falls Study Area Passengers True Ma•kel with LCC Adarai nenl-TOTAL Wrciefir Fr115 inn•Marker Wir:her:r FAN 7tcyron,N AvgxJri R7rok A,rGnr Prix POCw Sir;rr,' P.= I'UEW Share 1 American 491.532 873.3 49,5% 88,920 121.8 97.4% 1 2 5ouWweat 271.532 372.027.4% 0 Q 0 0.0% 3 Delta 103.3 7.6% 640 6.9 0.7% 4 United 72,167 98 9 7 3% 590 0.8 0.6% r 5 Saint 36,340 49.8 3.7% 0 0.0 0.0% 6 Frontier 24,067 33.0 2.4% 10 0.0 00% 7 Alaska 7,716 10,6 0.8% t,10 0.8 0.7% 8 Won)America 5,441 7.5 0.5% 0 0.0 0.0% 9 JetBlua 2.034 2.E 0.7% 10 0.0 D-0% 10 Great Lakes 27 0,6 0.0% 0.0 D.4% Total Arm, Prier.1 -s 992.439 1 3ri6 '666 0 91,776 125 166 6 I ■American a Southwest 'Delta •United ■Spirit 0 Frontier I ® Revenue Shares taw •, - 4,1 13% t7 6% il 13723 EMI Era 1 ft Passenger Shares 1 S American *Southwest united a Delta ■Splrit Frontier I Originating Airline for Wichita Falls Study Area Revenue True li rBei wlh LCC Adiustmeei•TOTAL I Nl,r terra F.i!!5 true A1,trker IV,cl,ila FuNi Rrrprrrr,tr Aulr0rr Rank Arr6nt� Rry RDEW $b;vr A' r-vc nr,v nor/6 .111.1re 1 American 5126,795,738 $173,693 58.6% S258 S21,878,110 S29,970 92.9% 2 Sou0viesf $41,858.931 $57.341 t8.7% S7 - $0 $0 D.0°/ 3 United $22,339,755 $30,642 10.4% 3310 $27B,Y30 $J6 1.2% 4 Delta $22,217,449 $30,435 9.951. 5295 1397,460 $544 1.7% 5 Spirit $3,223.204 $4,415 1.4% $89 SO 50 0.0% IB Frontier $2,952,346 $3.907 1.3 $119 $3,850 $5 0.0%7 Alaska $1.939,272 $2.657 0.99s $251 $224,690 530t3 1.0% 8 Virgin America 51,064.924 $1.459 0.5% $196 $0 SO 0.0% 9 JM91ue $358,138 $491 0.2% 517E $1.950 $3 0.0% 10 Great Lakes 513.325 $18 0.0% $403 $0 $0 0.0% rul>I'SPS A•c+f?nrn:.r- 122.t:,irr.i 7_� 536fi 256 100.0 S7'r.'0 c 7r 5.G7.8:1 532.275 i 0•� F eye page 32ss.rc•r..,, ..,❑,w PAGE 77 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F 1222.663,082 44 lc 122.784.360 9fi 7 PAGE 78 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F C Air Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Markets to/from the Wichita Falls Area II Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample Directional Journeyed.Passengers rCI,t:N,!„L1 1Ll.. a. ••,_,.. „rr r,c.: 1?elta II Alf Total ['Div; Sli•:' P1]:'.'f 5.,....' PL E.W Share l�0rW 1 Houston 12 9 14 2% 7$3 $O 7"1° D.D 0.0% 90.9 El 2 Les Vegas 25.1 35.T°l. 30 6 43.6% 1.6 2.2% 70.4 3 Denver 8.4 14 894, 74 7 36 3% 0.4 0.1% 04.4 4 Los Angeles Rash 32.9 55.7% 10 0 169% 1.8 3.0% 59.0 5 Chicago 25.1 29.3% t t 1 55$ 1. 2.6% 55.6 I 6 Washington I BalLmore 26.6 56.6% 12 0 25 3Y° 3.2 47,4 7 San Francisco Bey Area 16.5 39.3% 100 23.8% 1.5 3.5% 42.0 8 New York I Newark 26.6 63.6% 2 8 6.7% 5.5 13.2% 41.8 9 Atlanta 11.9 31.5°! 84 22.2% 14.7 36.8% 37.9 I 10 Orlando Sanford 1.8.6 55.2% 69 20.4% 2.2 6.4% 33.6 11 Phoenix/Mesa t5.0 46.1% 13.8 42.4% 0.4 1.3% 32.6 12 New Orleans 9.7 32.4% 16.2 53.9% 0.4 1.4% 30.1 13 South Florida 18.6 68.6% 20 7.3% 2.0 7.4% 27.0 1 14 El Paso 13.6 53.3% 11 4 44 5/ 0.0 0.0% 25.6 15 Seattle 1 Tacoma 12.8 54.0% 1.7 7 0% 1.1 4.7% 23,8 16 San Diego 1 1 0 49.6% 5.6 25.1% 0.5 2.1% 22.3 17 St Louis 7,8 39.4% '•1 7 589% 0.1 0.8% 19.9 1 18 Kansas City T 2 39.7% 0 7 56.0% 0.2% YE.2 19 Auslln 7A 38.2% 10.9 59.8% 0.0 0.0% 13.2 20 San Anlanlo 9.4 52.2% 8.2 45.9% 0.0 0.0% 18.0 21 BosIon 11.3 64.3% 12 6.9% 1.0 5.7% 17.6 ' I 22 Philadelphia 13.1 78.2% 09 5.4% 49% 46.7 23 Cancunt 7.4 10.1% 0 3 1.6% 0.4 2.3% 18.2 24 Minneapolis 5.9 45.4% 0.8 5.4% 5.0 32.5% 13.3 25 Charlotte 17.9 79.6% 0.6 1.7% 2.1 13.9% 15.0 I 26 Tampa I Si.Petersburg 9.3 62.6% 2.6 17.5% 0.9 6.2% 14.8 27 Deeoii 5 5 41 0% 1.3 9.7% 4.8 36.1% 13.4 28 t4dland(Odessa 3.1 26.5% 8.6 73.0% 0.0 0.0% 11.8 29 Lubbock 3.4 29 3% 8.t 70.5% 0.0 0 0% 11,4 I 30 Nash Wile 8.3 T3 7% 2.3 20 6% 0.4 3 8% 11.3 31 AEbuquerqu. 4.6 451% 5.3 S2A% 0.0 00% 10.1 32 South Texas 2 3 24 5% 6.6 68.7% 0.0 0 0% 9,5 33 Portland,OR 4.2 44.7% 1.3 13.3% 0.7 7.0% 9.5 I 34 Salt Lake City 4.3 45.7% 08 8.9% 3.1 32 8% 9.6 35 Sacramento 5.4 600% 2.3 254% 0.4 4.5% 9.0 36 Dallas 1 Ft.Worth 7 9 100 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 7.9 37 Amarillo 2.5 31 6% 5.4 662% 0.0 0.0% 7.9 I 38 Huntswne 5.9 79 7% 0.0 0.0% 1.1 14.8% 7.4 39 Pinsburgh 5.9 810% 0.4 60% 0.6 7.6% 7.3 40 Bullhead City I Laughlin 5.9 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 7.4 41 Reno 3.7 52 8% 2.3 33.0% 0.4 5.5% 7.1 1 42 Tulsa 2.9 472% 3.2 527Io 0.0% 6.1 43 Raleigh 1 Durham 5 5 69 3% 0.3 4.5% 0.3 5.0% 6.1 44 Honolulu 4.8 80.7% 0.0 0.0% 0.3 4.8% 5.9 _ 45 Columbus 4.6 774% 0.7 12.2% 0.4 6.9% 5.9 I 46 Jacksonvllla 47 809% 0.4 6.5% 0.7 11.3% 5.9 47 Norfolk 1 Newport News 4.5 76 5% 0.2 3.5% 1.0 17.4% 5.4 48 Indianapolis 49 847,e 0.3 5.7% 0.4 6.2% 5.8 49 San Juan 3.8 68.3% 0 4 7.6% 0.8 14.0% 5.6 1 50 UtUe Reck 3.2 59.4% 22 406% 0.0 0 0% 5.4 1 i... 1 1,i:r 1 OL'.ti 7 .. . T? . 'r. .0,.4 paired wrap page 34 page 33 PAGE 79 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Air Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Markets totfrom the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approldrnates 100%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers 1// q.i.. .1.iai 1r,. ntii -LV.' .y,r -"r YA c'..., F''ht'A• ri VH to. 1 Houston 4.7 5,1% 0.0 0.0'.t 0.0 0..0% 90-9 '.. 2 Las Vegas 2 4 3.4% 7.3 10.4% 3.3 4.7% 70.4 ' 3 Denver 10.6 16.5% 1.9 2.9% 17 7 27.5% 44.4 4 Los Angeles Basin 5.3 8.9% 2 6 4 3% 2.7 4.5% 59.0 5 Chicago 5.1 9.2% 1.6 2.8% 0.2 0.3% 55.4 6 Washington I Baltimore 3.4 7.2% 1 9 19% 0.1 0.19E 47.4 7 San Franciaoa 8ay Area 5.7 13.6% 3.5 8.3% 1.6 2.3% 42.0 8 New York 1 Newark 5.2 12,5% 1.5 3.6% 0.1 0.1% 41.6 9 At ante 0.4 1.1% 2.4 8.4% 0.0 0.0% 37.9 10 °rondo I Sanford 1.8 6.3% 3 0 8.9% 0 1 0.2% 33.4 11 Phverrix/Mese 1.1 3.2% 1.3 4.0% 1.0 3.0% 32.4 12 New Gleans 1.0 3.4% 2.7 9.0% 0.0 0.0% 30.1 13 South Flod4a 1.0 3.5% 3.5 13.1% 0.0 0.0% 27.0 14 El Peas 0.6 2.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 25.6 15 Seattle 1 T9oorne 1.4 5.9% 0.0 D.0% 1.9 8 2% 23.8 16 San Diego 1.2 5.3% 2.2 0.8% 1.2 5.3% 22.3 17 StLarls 0.2 1.1% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 19.9 18 Kansas City 0.1 0.3% 0.2 1.0°I. 0.0 0.0% 14,2 19 Austin 0.4 2.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 14.2 20 San Antonio 0.4 2.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 11,0 21 Boston 1.0 5.6% 0.5 2.7% 0.0 0.0% 17.6 22 Philadelphia 0.5 3.1% 1.4 8.4% 0.0 0.0% 16.7 23 Cancun 1.6 9.7% 2.6 16.0% 0.0 0.7% 14,2 24 Minneapolis 0.4 2.6% 1.9 12.3'/. 03 1,9% 15.3 26 Charlotte 0.4 2.8% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 15.0 26 Tampa I St.Petersburg 0.7 4.9% 1 3 8.7% 0.0 0.1% 14.6 27 Dearall 0.3 2.2% 15 10.8% 0.0 0.1% 13.4 26 Midland/Odessa 0.1 0.5% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 11.4 29 Lubt,sc k 0.0 0.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 11.4 30 Nashville 01 1.9% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0,0% 11.3 31 Albuquerque 0.3 2.5% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.3% 10.1 32 South Tex9S 0.6 6.7% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 9.5 33 Parlor .OR 0.7 7.7% 0.5 5.7% 0.8 8.8% 9.5 34 Sall take City 0.3 3.3% 0.0 0 0% 0.9 9.4. 9.5 I 35 Sacramento 0.9 10.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 rl 36 Dales/Ft.Worth 0,0 0 0% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 7.9 37 Amarklo 0.0 0 2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 7.9 38 Hunlsvine 0.4 5.5% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 7.4 39 Plttat>4rgh 0.4 5 3% 0,0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 7.3 40 &Ahead City I Laughlin 0.0 0.0% 0.D 0.0% 0.0 0.09E 7.1 41 Reno 0.6 8 8% 0.0 0.0% 0.6 0.0% 7.1 42 Tulsa 0.0 0.1% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 6.1 43 Raleigh 1 Durham 0 1 t.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 6.1 44 Honolulu 0,7 12.6% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.1% 5.9 ' 45 Columbus 0.2 3.5% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 5,9 46 Jstksanv1lle 0.1 1.2% 6.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 5.9 47 Norfolk I Newport News 0.1 2.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.4% 5.9 45 Indianapolis 0.2 3.1% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.2% 5.4 i 49 San Juan 0.4 0.6'% 0.2 3.3% 0.0 0.0% 5.6 56 Lillie Rack 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0,0 0.6% 5.4 V i.. ;.1 ., °fl Pad with Page 33 i(., . v�34 .._ ... PAGE 80 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F il Air Carrier Avg Fares at 50 Largest True O&D Markets to/from the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample-Directorial Journeyed Passengers j Alruorr,,}tuII.;jIC Arnerrc.rn SGrgh•�sC 91 13r![:, Tuilrl r;,�rri Ar,pvr:Aitrro A:wr h+a3 f:,�,� POFW Ary F.nr PUFW Avg F.t,..• Pf,;A' Avo i..1rt• 1 Hausion $152 12.9 5148 73.3 50 0.0 5150 2 Las Vegas E195 25.1 1171 30 6 #189 1.6 $171 3 Denver $170 9.a $103 24 7 $1fi1 0.1 $176 4 Los PJtgB1e5 Bash $221 32.9 $193 10.0 $220 1.8 $287 $167 5 Chicago $204 10,4 $143 3i 1 $179 1.4 I 6 Washington/Baltimore $253 26.8 5186 12 0 $211 3.2 #226 7 San Franrasea bay Area 5219 18,5 5205 10.0 S244 1.5 3204 8 New York i Newark 3242 26.6 $179 2 8 5260 5 5 $240 9 Atlanta 5193 11.9 $135 8 4 5209 14 7 1179 I 10 Orlando/Sanford 5195 18 b 5154 6.9 S268 22 5176 11 Phoenix 1Mesa E189 15.0 $175 138 $178 D.4 $150 i2 New Orleans $149 9.7 $137 18 2 $228 0 4 6136 13 South Florida $204 18.6 $163 2.0 $228 20 $119 11 14 Fl Paso $18413.6 5164 11.4 $Q 0.0 1176 15 Seattle I Tacoma 3250 12.5 $218 1 7 $252 1 1 $229 16 San Diego S234 11.0 5179 56 $2i2 0.5 $200 17 St Louis $180 7,8 $153 11 7 $177 0.1 $164 I le Kansas City $166 $148 7.2 #164 5143 10.7 5164 0.0 00 $183 19 AuAustin7.0 10.9 SO 5146 20 San Antonio $178 9.4 $146 8 2 S0 0.0 $164 21 Boston 3218 11.3 5201 12 $271 10 $211 I 22 Philadelphia $229 13.1 $237 0.9 $247 0.8 $218 23 Cancun 5243 91 4 5219 0.3 $252 0 $233 24 Minneapolis 5205 6.9 5168 0.6 S253 5 0 3200 25 Charlotte 5235 11.9 5183 06 5199 21 5227 I 20 Tampa/St.Petersburg jig$ 9.3 $169 2.6 $220 0.0 1113 27 Detroit 5206 5 5 $156 1 3 1256 4.8 5207 28 Midland/Odessa $169 3.1 5148 86 50 0.0 $153 29 Lubbock $135 3 4 3120 B 1 30 0,0 3125 IF 30 Nashville 5189 8 3 $184 2.3 $224 0.4 $191 31 Albuquerque $166 46 5149 53 $322 0.0 $159 32 South Texas S168 2 3 $152 6 6 $0 0.0 $141 33 Portland,OR $243 4 2 $195 1.3 $224 0.7 $210 I 34 Salt Lake City 5215 4.3 $164 0 8 5229 3.1 $203 35 Sacramento 5258 5 4 $204 2.3 $218 0.4 $240 36 Dallas r Ft.Worth $106 7 9 SO 0 0 S0 MD $105 37 Amanita 5142 2 5 3116 5.4 SO 0.0 1124 I 38 Huntsville 5291 5 9 #Q 0.0 $263 1.1 6264 39 Pittsburgh 5331 5 9 3221 0 4 3253 0.6 5234 40 elllheed City 1 ieurdhtln 50 0 0 60 0 0 10 0.0 SO 41 Reno 5215 3 7 $219 2 3 5235 0.4 $216 '.. b 42 Tulsa $99 2 9 591 3 2 30 0.0 $95 43 Raleigh 1 Durham $224 $$ 5210 0 3 $242 0.3 $224 44 Honolulu $459 48 50 00 $422 0.3 5455 45 Columbus $205 4 6 S223 0 7 5227 0.4 5210 1 46 Jackeon,alie #206 4 7 $185 04 5229 $208 47 Norfolk I Niel oft News5256 4 5 5211 0 2 3271 1.9 5256 48 Indianapolis $191 4 9 $179 0 3 $213 0.a 3193 49 San Juan 5280 3.0 5163 0 4 5275 0.8 3268 1 50 Little Rack $180 3.2 $126 2.2 30 0.0 6150 1 Avrrnq;r.Tire F ire,POE W $799 173,3 372 0 5295 193 3 52:6 paned alfh page 36 i.t7 V. page 35 PAGE 81 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F l:.•• i •, Air Carrier Avg Fares at 50 Largest True O&D Markets to/from the Wichita Fails Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers 4.rooil rdUlC.lA4 W.1 I 5130.1, r:.'•'.i: Lra.a f .., 441..041 MM i.Ari+n a:el c rrc P111, dv.1 t°.nre- 1111rW Aa.et Faur Avu Frur ' 1 Houston $183 4,7 50 0.0 $0 0.0 3150 1 2 Les Magas $199 2.4 $85 7.3 5135 3.3 6171 3 Denver $152 toe 339 1.9 193 17.7 $116 4 Los Angeles Basin $234 5.3 394 2.6 3140 2.7 3207 5 Chicago $222 5.5 $65 1.6 $116 0.2 6167 6 Washington I Baltimore $241 3.4 590 1.5 3179 0.1 $220 1 7 San Francisco Bay Area 1236 5,7 $77 3,5 3547 1.0 $204 I 8 New York 1 Newark 3277 5.2 $126 1.5 1166 0,1 3240 0 Manta $183 0.4 S83 2.4 5206 0.0 1170 10 Orkande 1 Sanford $186 1.8 182 3.0 $155 0.1 317e 41 Phoenix 1 Mesa 1181 1.1 381 1.3 $131 1 0 $180 12 New Orleans $210 1.0 541 2 7 $0 0 0 3136 13 South Florida 3224 1.0 596 3.5 5196 0.0 3160 14 El Paso 3234 0.6 $0 0.0 S0 0,0 1175 15 Seattle 1 Tacoma 3223 1.4 SO 0.0 3167 1.9 $220 16 San Diego 3232 1.2 687 2.2 3150 1.2 $200 17 St Lod s $184 02 $0 0.0 30 0.0 $164 18 Kansas City 5169 0.1 526 0.2 50 0.0 3163 19 A45tin $107 0.4 $0 0.0 10 0.0 $144 20 San Antonio 3223 0 4 50 0.0 $0 0.0 6164 21 B4-4l0n $246 1.0 S80 0.5 S0 0.0 $211 22 Philadelphia S266 05 570 1.4 SO 0.0 $218 23 Cancun $270 1.6 5167 2.6 $244 0.0 1233 24 Mmnespolrs $215 0.4 $64 t.9 3138 0.3 1200 25 Charlotte $236 0 4 $0 0.0 $0 0 0 6227 26 Tampa/St.Petersburg 3225 0.7 367 1 3 $139 0.0 $1113 27 Depoll $213 0.3 S92 1.5 $139 0.0 $207 28 kediand/Odessa $170 0.1 SO 0.0 50 0.0 6153 20 Lubbock 5213 0.0 50 0.0 SO 0.0 1125 30 Nashville $275 0.2 so 0.0 3151 0.0 3101 31 Adbuqueroue 5228 0,3 S0 6.0 5114 0.0 3150 32 South Texas 5228 0.6 30 0.0 60 0.0 $161 33 Portland.OR $225 0 7 389 0.5 I159 0.8 $210 34 Sail Laka Clry 3220 0 3 $0 0.0 3140 0.9 $206 35 Sacramento $233 0.9 $0 0.0 $501 0.0 $240 36 Da0aa f Ft.Worth SO 0.0 30 0.0 S0 0.0 6106 i 37 Amarillo 3114 0.0 60 0.0 SO 0.0 $124 38 HuntsWle $237 0.4 30 0.0 SO 0.9 $284 1 36 Pittsburgh $260 0.4 SO 0.0 SO 0.0 $234 40 Bullhead City 1 Lar+t lln $0 0.O $0 0.6 SO 0.0 SO 41 Reno 6216 0.6 $0 0.0 SO 0.0 $218 42 Tulsa $303 0.0 SO 0 0 $0 0.0 $95 43 Rafelgh f Durham 5251 0.1 TO 0 9 SO 0 fl $224 44 Honolulu 5448 0.7 SO 0.0 $593 0.0 1455 45 Columbus $252 0.2 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 3210 46 Jacksonville 5259 0.1 S0 0,0 30 0 0 3208 47 Norfolk f Nswpoi Nara $227 0.1 30 O.0 1169 0.0 $256 48 lndianeporis 5229 0.2 S0 0.0 $147 0.0 3193 49 San Juan $267 0.4 $190 0.2 $0 00 $266 50 Lillie Rock $253 0.0 S0 0.0 SO 0.0 1138 • _-.. �.. - r .r ti .. 2[, paired with pew 36 page 35 oe35 i}frrcw..wr+.a ..w i. PAGE 82 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F r Air Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at SPS Twelve Months Ended Septomber 2014 Apptmelmates t00'Y Sample 06ee16onal Journeyed Passengers A.rpun+Mon iplc Ucli 1 A1ns'.•,1 TOtaI R:nrs nirn:tMpliahi+� POLVv 00E04 Share F17E1nv 5)ii r POFW 1 Houston 3.2 99.6% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 3.3 2 Las Vegas 3 1 99.1% 00 0.4% 0.0 0.0% 3.1 3 Denver 19 1000% 00 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 11 4 Los Angeles8asin 4.5 1000% 00 00% 0.0 00% 45 5 Chicago 2.8 100.0% 00 00% 0.0 00% 2.1 6 Washington 1%Rimor4 5.3 99.7% 00 0.3% 0.0 0.0% 5.3 7 San Francisco Bay Area 1,9 99.3% 0 0 0.O% 0.0 0.0% 1.8 8 New York/Newark 4.7 100.0% 0 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 4.7 9 Atlanta 3.4 99.8% 0 0 0.4% 0.0 0.0% 3.4 10 Orlando I Sanford 2.8 90.5% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0Y. 2.5 1 1 Phoenix!Mesa 2.9 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.9 12 New°means 0.9 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 13 South Florida 1 9 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.8 14 El Paso 1.3 100 0% 0 6 0,0% 0.0 0.0% 1.3 15 Seattle 1 Tacoma 2.1 87 9% 0 0 0.0% 0.3 12.T% 2.4 16 San Diego 1.4 99.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.4 17 St Louis 1.5 100.0% 0 0 0.00'. 0.0 0.0% 1.5 18 Kansas Cily 0.9 1 C0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0 0% 0.1 19 Austin 1.5 100.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.5 20 San Antonio 2.0 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.0 21 Boston 1.2 98.8% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.2 • ' 22 Philadelphia 2 2 106.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.2 23 Cancun 0.1 100.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.1 • 24 Minneapolis 1.5 901% 00 0.9% 0.0 0.0% 1.5 25 Charlotte 1.5 100.0% 00 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.5 26 Tampa!Si Petersburg 1.4 99 0% 0 0 1.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.4 27 Detroit 1.2 989% 00 1.1% 00 0.0% 1.2 28 Midland I Odessa 0.2 100.0% 0.6 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.2 29 Lubbock 0.0 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 30 Nashville 1.6 100 0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1,2 31 Albuquerque 0.0 100.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% OA 32 South Texas 0.4 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0'1. 0.4 33 Portland,OR O.e 100.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.6 34 Salt Lake City 1.3 90 2% 0 0 0.8% 0.0 0.0% 1.5 35 Sacramenln 1.6 99 1% 00 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 1.4 35 Dallas!Ft.Worth 4 7 100 0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 4.7 37 Amarillo 0 0 1 C0 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 38 Huntsville 0 7 1 C0.0% 0 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.7 39 Pittsburgh 2.4 100 0% 0 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 2.4 40 Bullhead City I Laughlin 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 4.1 Reno 03 1000% 00 00% 0.0 0.0% 0.3 42 Tulsa 0.2 100 0% 0 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% a.2 43 Raleigh f Dt rtar" 1 7 100 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.7 44 Honolulu 0.7 94 5% 00 0.0% 0.0 1.8% 0.8 45 Columbus 1.6 100 0% 00 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 1.4 46 Jacksonville 1 0 100 0% 00 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.0 47 Norlotk 1 Newport News 1.3 99 0% 0.0 1.0% 0.0 0,0% 1.3 48 Indianapolis 14 1000% 0.0 110% 0.0 0.0% 1.4 49 San Juan 0.3 1.00.0% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.3 50 UI11e Rode 1 0 t00 0% 00 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.0 1(91.'i1 1.rr I..... ,. .. T91.11 Thus PDWW I911aro 121 15 Ii7 a 0 3 "1 0 0!', 125 0 _t rN } tiir,..,..... page 37 #s1..r -,.„.n.nq•..a„r.,.,� PAGE 83 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at SPS Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Appro,dmalee 100%Sample-Diredlonat Journeyed Passengers Ai'in,!r tr1riII i11c' A,,!,.; i1c'l1, Alot.h.r A,..r.m._. N:i.rk A.r rr rt 11r•Irn A.rl IlD['N F..., F!C1EW F.irre 1171F4V Fnry lire 1 Houston S543 $187 $0 $0 SO SO $16e 2 Las Vegas $623 $204 Ill $775 S0 SO 1207 3 Denver S374 $198 $0 $e S9 SO $198 4 Los Angeiee Basin $953 S213 S0 $0 50 SO $213 5 Chicago $537 $189 SO S0 SO S0 $1$9 6 Waehingtgn I Baltimore $1.651 $31 t $8 $580 50 S0 $312 7 San Francisco Bay Area $413 3218 SO S0 SO S0 $218 8 New York/Newark S1.007 $213 SO SO SO S0 S213 9 Atlanta S624 5184 36 S441 S9 S0 $1115 10 Orlando I Sanford $609 S216 SO 30 S0 SO $216 11 Phoenix/Mesa $597 3204 10 SD So S0 $204 12 Hew Orleans $135 $173 $0 50 S0 S0 S173 13 South Florida $397 $204 S9 SO 50 SO 2204 14 El Paso $206 S155 SO S0 S0 S0 $155 15 Seattle/Tacoma 3584 3280 S0 SO S70 $242 $278 16 San Diego $323 5227 50 $0 S0 $0 $27a 17 St Louis $393 $1119 50 S0 50 $0 $199 18 Kansas City $165 $177 $0 So S9 SO $177 19 Austin $232 $151 SO SO SO SO $151 20 San Antonio $345 1176 SO SO S0 S9 $176 21 Boston S253 1220 SO $0 50 SO $219 22 Philadelphia $822 $282 $0 SO $0 30 $262 23 Cancun $31 $230 $0 $0 $0 10 $230 24 Minneapolis $293 $193 $4 $445 $0 $0 $195 25 Charlotte $310 S2132 50 SO SO SO $202 26 Tamps/St.Petersen $269 $198 S6 $403 SO 50 $200 27 Detroit $234 $199 $4 $306 SO $0 $200 28 Midland/Odessa S45 $194 SO SO S0 $0 $194 29 Lubbock $10 $247 $0 SO $0 $0 $247 30 Nashville S303 $170 SO $0 30 S0 5170 31 Albuquerque S154 5197 SO SO SO SO $197 32 South Texas $85 $193 So S0 SO $0 $183 33 Portland.OR $236 $313 $0 SO $O SO $313 34 Sali Lake City $388 $216 $9 $675 SO S0 $220 35 Sacramento $510 $324 S0 SO $0 $0 $324 36 Dallas/Ft.Worth $438 $93 SO SO 50 50 $93 37 Amarillo S3 S217 $0 $O 50 S0 $217 38 Hunlsvaie $140 $190 10 $0 $0 SO $190 39 Pals burgh $546 $232 SO $0 SA SO $232 40 Bullhead City/LaugMm SO $O $0 $0 S0 so i0 41 Reno S72 $211 SO 10 SO $0 $211 42 Tulsa $25 $155 SO SO S0 SO $155 43 Raleigh I Durham S448 $264 SO SO SO SO $204 44 Honolulu S382 $536 S0 $0 50 $0 $920 45 Columbus S306 3187 SO $0 S0 50 3167 46 Jackienvf9® S216 S226 SO S0 $0 SO $228 47 Norfolk/Newport Haws $362 $272 S5 S332 S0 S0 $273 48 Indianapolis $234 $169 SO 50 S0 S0 $169 49 San Jusn $113 $330 $0 $0 SO SO $330 50 Lillie Rock $227 $237 SO $0 $0 SO $237 r rnr,il-iiir ICL'LY/.F.Ir... 579.35?3 ,:2.t, :S20 SO22 5m0 .3ir7 {:53 _.. page 38 PAGE 84 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F r 1 . Air Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at DFW Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Ap p r.i xlmalei 100%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers A.rape! ul l'Jtr Amer'Can Soso 1)e113 'Cr!al Ito... A,ru,r..ti+.'uu hrr.. P00W Shut P0£W SI.rr PDEW 51+4,..r I,-IFYt 1 Houslon 7 3 86.1% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 6.t 2 Las Vegas 17.1 67 3% 7.3 289% 0.3 1 3% 25.4 3 Denver 6 1 38 6% 1.9 119% 0.0 0.3% 15.9 4 Los Angeles Basin 16.4 68.8% 2.6 10 5% 0.4 1 7% 24.5 5 Chicago 6.1 66.1% 1.6 169% 0.3 27% 9,3 6 Washington 1 Baltimore 9.3 72 7% 1.9 14 6% 0.7 5 7% 12.7 7 San Francisca Bay Area 9 2 48.3% 3.5 18 1% 0.4 2.1% 19.1 8 New York 1 Newark 11.6 63.7% 1 5 8 2% 3.2 17.8% 16.2 9 Allanla 4 5 38 0% 2 4 20.5% 4.9 41.2% 11-6 10 Orlando!Sanford 10.0 72 81' 3 0 218% 0.6 4.1% 13.8 11 Phoenix 1 Mesa 8.6 E5 1%. 1 3 12.8% 0.1 0.6% 10.1 12 New Orleans 6.9 70.4% 27 27.4% 0.1 atm 0.8 13 South Florida 10 8 71 3% 3.5 23.3% 0.6 4.1% 15.2 14 £l Paso 56 9$5% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 5.5 15 Seattle/Tacoma 6.2 54.2% 0.0 0 0% 0.4 3.7% 11.5 16 San Diego 6.4 65 9% 2.2 22.2% 0.2 2.0% 9.5 17 SILouis 3.3 969% 0.0 0.0% 0.1 2.1% 3A 18 Kansas City 4.2 94 5% 0.2 4.0% 0.0 0.7% 4.5 19 Austin 3 7 99 2% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 3.7 20 San Anlonlo 2.5 99.3% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.5 21 Roston 6.6 65.3% 0.5 4.8% 0,2 2.5% 70.2 22 Philadelphia 6.5 76 7% 1 4 17.1% 0.2 2.9% 3.2 23 Cancun 9 7 76 1% 2.8 21.7% 0.1 0.6% 12.7 24 Minneapolis 3.2 39 3% 2.0 24 7% 2.8 34.5% 8.1 i 25 Charlotte 5.4 912% 0.0 0.0% 0.5 7.1% 7.0 26 Tampa l St Petersburg 4.6 73 2% 1.3 20.5% 0.3 4.9% 5.3 27 DeOoil 2.2 37.1% 1.5 24.9% 2.1 36 7% 5.6 28 Midland r Odessa 2.3 98.2% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.3 29 Lubbock 2 8 99.7% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 2.6 30 Neshvdia 2 8 95 8% 0.0 0.0% 0.1 3.6% 2.4 31 Albuquerque 2 3 97.8% 0 0 0.05'. 0.0 0.0% 2.4 32 Soulh Texas 1 1 93.1% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.014 1-2 33 Portland,OR 2 2 49.3% 0 5 12.3% 0.2 5.3% 4.4 34 Salt Lake City 1 4 48 9% 9 0 0.0% 1.1 38.7% 2.4 35 Sacramento 1 b 85.4% 9.0 0.0% 0.1 6.1% 2.2 36 Dallas r FI Worth 0 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0 0 37 Amarillo 2.0 99.7•; 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.1 38 Hun Is,olle 1.5 55.5% 0.0 0.0% 0.2 9.1% 1.7 39 Pittsburgh 1.6 88.9% 0.0 0.0% 0.1 6.9% 1.6 40 Bullhead City/La'9hlm 0.0 9.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.5 41 Ran❑ 2.7 91.1% 0.0 007s 0.1 4.2% 3,0 42 Tulsa 2 4 99.9% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.4 43 Raleigh 1Durham 0.6 860% 0.0 0.0% 0.1 12.8% 0.7 44 Honolulu 2 5 81 2% 0 0 0.0% 0.2 5.2% 3.0 45 Columbus 12 891% 00 0.0% 0.1 8.2% 1.4 46 Jacksonville 1.8 85 95. 0.0 0.0% 0.3 13 2% 2.1 47 Norlolk 1 Newport News 1.1 75.6% 0.0 0.0% 0.3 21.1% 1.4 48 Indianapolis 1.6 87 2% 0.0 0.0% 0.2 9.4% 1.6 49 San Juan 1.9 62.0% 0.2 7.9% 0.2 7.1% 2.3 S0 LHtie Rock I I 99.9% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.1 brat True PDEW f Shard. -'. '.. V.I rl'u . 23 J 7 41'ii J paired with page 40 {L. _.. . r.. page 39 PAGE 85 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Air Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at DFW I/ � s Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample Directional Journeyed Passengers shisk_, .. . ,.r.:-i .° ..,,•, rnrw S11drt' I°0hW 5h11'0 rnr* Ss,.i•.• PDLWW 1 Houston 1.1 13.9% 0_0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 6.1 i 2 Las Vegas 0.3 1.4% 0.0 0.0% 0.2 0.8% 25.4 3 Denver 1.6 10.0% 0.0 0.0% 6.3 39.3% 15.9 4 Los Angeles Basin 1.3 5.5% 0.6 2.3% 0.1 0.3% 24.5 5 Chicago 1.3 14.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.1% 9.3 ' 6 Washington i Saltlm0re 0.9 6.7% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 12.1 7 San Francisco Bay Area 2 1 10.9% 0.2 0.8% 0.0 0.2% 19.1 8 New York'Newark 1.9 9.7% 0 0 0.0% 0,0 0.0% 18.2 9 Atlanta 0.0 0.4% 0.0 0.0% D.0 0.0% 11.8 10 Orlando I Sanford 0.2 1.1% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0 1% 13.6 11 Phoenix/Mesa 0 1 0.8% 0 0 0.0% 0.1 0 7% 10.1 12 New Orleans 0.1 1.3•/. 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 9.6 13 South Florida 0.2 12% 0.0 DO% 0.0 0.0% 152 '1 14 El Paw 0.1 1 5% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 5.6 15 Seethe f Tacoma 0.5 4.0% 3.9 34.2% 0.2 1.6% 11.5 16 San Diego 0.3 3.0% 0.5 5.3% 0.0 0.3% 9.8 17 SI Louis 0.0 1.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 3.4 18 Kansas City 0.0 0.8% D.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 4.6 19 Austin 0.0 0.8% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0 0% 3,7 20 San Antonio 0.0 0.7% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 ❑0% 2.5 21 Boston 0.2 2.6% 0.0 D.0% 0.0 00% 10.2 22 Philadelphia 01 1.2% 0.0 0.0% 0,0 00% Li M 23 Cenwrr 0.2 1.5% 0.0 0.0"4 0.0 0.0% 12.7 24 Minneapolis 0.1 1.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.1% 6.1 25 Charlotte 0.1 1 6% 0 0 0.0°I. 0,0 0 0% 7.0 ti 26 Tampa I St.Petersburg 0.1 1,4% 0.0 U.0% 0.0 0.0% 6.3 27 061roll 0.1 1.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.1% $.8 28 Midland/Odesas 0.0 1.8% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.3 29 Lubbadr 0.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.8 1 30 Nashville 0.0 06% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.9 31 Albuquerque 0.0 1.9% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.2% 2.4 32 South Texas 0 1 6.9% 0.D 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1,2 33 Portland.OR 0.2 4.4% 1.2 26.0% 0.1 2.1% 4.4 34 Sal1 Lake City 0.1 2 2% 0.0 0.1% 0.3 10.2% 2.9 35 Sacramento 0.2 7,8% 00 0.2% 0.0 0.0% 2.2 36 Dallas I Ft.Worth 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% D.0 0.0% 0.0 37 Amarillo 0.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.1 1 38 Huntsville 0.0 2.1% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.7 39 Pittsburgh 0.1 4 2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.8 40 Bolthaad City r Laughlin 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 4 0.0 0.0% 2.8 41 Reno 0.1 4.4% D.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0% 3.0 42 Tulsa 0.0 0.1% 00 0.0% 00 0.0% 2.4 43 Raleigh I Durham 0.0 1 2% D.❑ 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.7 44 Honolulu 0.3 10.6% 0.1 2.8% 0.0 0.0% l0 45 Columbus 0.0 2.5Y4 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.4 46 Jadtsornllle 0.0 0.8% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.1 47 Norfolk I Newport News 0.0 2.944 0.0 0.0% 0,0 0.5% 1.4 48 Indianapolis 0.1 3.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.3% 1.6 49 San Juan 0 1 2.8% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.3 , ' 50 Lillie Rock 0.0 0.1% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.1 • T r.::ul 1•.,,•I•;,l,4'+'...,..,. j`,: 7,'. 122 i ' '9 I' paired with paps 39 . -. page 40 PAGE 86 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F .. I . 'tl'i I Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at DFW Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approdrrlates 100%Sample Directional Journeyed Passengers Air unr:;MO link: []c il.i Avrria3e. Rn:.k A,rpn,t WO o Aria RCFYJ rave RDEW ran-.. FlDE1N Fare Fmc I I I Houston $981 $138 SO SO SD S0 $141 2 Las Vegas $3,282 $192 3623 $85 $50 $151 $160 3 Deriver $946 5154 S73 $39 $7 $159 $121 4 Los Angeles Basin $3 424 $209 $241 $94 $83 $197 $194 5 Chica95 11.288 $210 $133 $85 642 $167 $190 M s Washington f Ballmore $2,282 $246 $166 $89 $131 $178 $221 7 San Francisco Bay Area $2 066 $223 $266 $77 $86 $219 $191 9 New York I Newark S3231 $279 $188 $126 3847 $262 $265 s Atlanta $901 $201 $199 $82 $1,123 $231 $169 f0 Orlando!Sanford 11,918 $191 $245 582 S98 $172 $186 11 Phoenix!Mesa S1,682 $196 $79 $81 51T $167 $178 12 New Orleans $922 $133 $112 $41 $15 $170 $108 13 South Flprida 52.191 $202 $338 $95 1108 $173 $176 1 14 Et Paso Sala $160 $0 $0 $0 ¢0 5104 15 Sw 11la!Tanoma 51.427 5227 $0 $0 $90 $209 $210 16 San Diego $1.449 $225 5189 $87 $35 $176 $190 17 SILouis $547 $187 SO $0 $13 $176 $167 I 18 Farms City $582 $137 $5 $25 $5 $164 1133 19 Austin $47fi $139 SO $0 SO $0 $130 20 San Antonio $313 $124 SO SO SO SO $125 .11 21 Boston 51,367 5209 $37 $79 $55 $216 $194 22 P1i1190419h15 $1,379 $213 $96 $.88 $37 $152 $186 23 Cancun 51,812 $187 $359 $130 $15 $177 5225 24 Minneapolis $660 $208 $114 $57 $603 $217 $188 26 Overtone $1.611 $253 SO S0 $102 1204 1250 26 Tampa!St.Petersburg 5887 $193 $95 $66 $54 $175 $166 27 Deeoit $487 S224 $133 $91 $532 $248 $200 28 Midland/Odessa $348 $153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $153 29 Lubbock 1360 $129 SO SO $0 SO $129 30 Nashville $512 $183 SO SO $17 $166 $163 3i Albuquerque $349 $149 S0 50 S0 5354 $166 32 South Texas $163 $145 SO $0 S0 59 $146 33 Portland,OR $495 $226 $48 $88 $46 $196 $193 34 Salt Lake City 5300 $210 $0 SO $257 $227 $210 35 Sacramento $455 $238 S0 50 526 $188 $231 36 Dallas!Ft.Worth $0 so 3o $0 $0 30 $0 37 Amarillo $268 $131 $0 SO $0 S0 $131 38 Hun tsvilla $373 5254 10 $0 $34 $225 $251 39 Pittsburgh $371 $238 SO S0 $23 $1913 $232 40 Bullhead City!Laughlin SO 50 So $0 50 s0 1269 41 Reno $554 $205 50 so $25 $206 $205 42 Tulsa $261 $107 $0 SO S0 SO $107 43 Raleigh I Durham 5141 $229 $3 SO $17 $552 $223 44 Honolulu $941 5383 50 $0 $49 $316 $405 45 Columbus $248 $200 SO SO $19 $164 $197 ' 46 Jacksonville $394 $213 $0 $0 $50 $177 $209 47 Norfolk 1 Newport News $258 $241 S0 SO $64 $214 $234 48 Indianapolis $326 $205 SO $0 $30 $175 $202 49 San Juan 5317 1271 $34 $184 641 $248 $261 50 Little Rock 5134 $116 S0 SO S0 SO $116 Tr,Gd Trip,P^.EW r;harp' 57E 7,5 5250 S4.7J:J STh 510,255 5772 5245 pairod wiIh part 42 ! ptrge 41 PAGE 87 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at DPW Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approxrnata6 130%Sample•Direekinal Journeyed Passengers A•lc:.V „a r1W1 A.,lS4.• Fl u .• A..,,. r I..,.r. a.r--iiv r,1:uu Alt k•, ..r.r! I- i. ROF'N! Faro It DEW ,. •.�.ir' 1 Houston 5177 $150 SO $0 S0 SO $141 2 Las Vegas $60 $173 $1 $108 S20 $126 $130 3 Denver 5293 $184 S0 SO $604 S97 $121 4 LOS MOWS Basin $257 $192 $112 $195 $10 $140 $104 5 Chicago $299 S228 $0 50 S2 $184 $100 6 Washington 16a1lirsor9 $224 $263 SO SO S1 $163 $221 7 San Francesco Say Area $463 $221 131 $192 $5 $130 $191 8 New York 1 N¢werk $532 $302 $0 $0 $7 1182 $2$5 9 Mania $10 $223 $0 S0 $0 5193 5190 10 Orlando/Sanford 127 $169 $0 SO S2 $137 1100 11 Phoenix/Mesa $15 $179 SO SO $8 $118 $170 12 New Orleans $18 $145 SO S0 $0 f0 5100 13 South Florida $33 $179 S0 $0 $0 $457 $170 14 El Paso 114 $180 SO $128 SO $0 $100 15 SeatlIelTacoma $85 $187 $755 $192 $30 $162 $210 16 San Diego 560 5205 $105 $202 $4 $152 $140 17 SILoos S6 $107 SO s0 to SO 5137 18 Kansas City $6 $182 S0 $0 $0 S0 $133 19 AUs9n $7 $216 $O $0 $0 303 $130 20 San Antonio $3 $157 S0 $0 50 SO $125 21 Bosion $42 $299 SO $1.009 SD SO :144 22 Philadelphia $21 S222 $0 SO SO SO $100 23 Cancun $35 $166 $0 S0 Si $188 $225 24 Mlnnaapo95 $19 $206 $0 SO $5 $181 $180 25 Charlotte $28 $248 SO $0 $0 SO $2$0 26 Tampa l St.Petersburg $16 $104 SO $75 SO 5289 1100 27 0)etroe 515 S224 SO S0 Si $178 $200 28 Midland f Odessa $7 $172 SO $0 $0 $0 $153 29 Lubbock $1 $182 SO $o $0 $0 1120 30 Nashville $3 $161 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103 31 Albuquerque $8 $173 SO S0 $1 $125 $150 32 South Texas $12 $142 ID $0 SO $0 $140 33 Portland,OR 140 $204 5208 $180 $14 $149 $103 34 Salt Lake Oily Si $220 SO $17 $44 $148 S210 35 Sacramenm $34 $195 $2 $320 $0 $495 $231 30 Dallas/Ft.Worth SD SO S0 SO $0 $0 S9 37 Amarillo $1 $116 SO S0 SO 50 $131 30 Huntsville $9 $263 SO S0 S0 $0 $251 39 Pittsburgh $14 $156 $0 $0 SO $0 $232 40 Bugheed City I Laughlin S0 SO 40 50 SO SO 5289 41 Rano $26 $201 32 $216 SO 10 5265 42 Tulsa $1 $356 $0 30 $0 SD $107 43 Raleigh I Durham S2 5233 SO SO 50 $0 $223 44 Honolulu $121 $376 $33 $399 SO $275 SOS 45 Columbus S7 $1 set S0 S0 $0 $0 $197 48 Jacksonville $4 $274 SO $0 $0 $0 5200 47 Norfolk INewport News $9 5219 S0 S0 $1 $146 $234 48 Indianapolis $11 $194 SO SO Si $134 $202 49 San Juan $14 $216 SO $0 SO SO 5201 ' 50 Litho Rock SO $319 $0 $0 $0 SO S110 - ,rF,t,ron.RGI;W'I.rro S° 51711 5.'17 _'.4•• 71t)r7 pared with page 47 ,_ 1.., a VI -;r 4 , 'I', ',, j k.rl page 42 PAGE 88 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F CIAir Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at OKC Twelve Menthe Ended September 2014 Approxmates 100':Semple Directional oumeyed Pa$sengers il re'.rc,r r7r i.,ric Svrn•..'..,_i n,.','r.c.,,. 1r„leer ra',i R"w r.4 ar.iro•'L'e1•�1'r., !'L'ufl :1.1.: rill=Vr S'r.vr Pd4 W Shoe POE VV 1 Houston 32.1 889% 0.7 2.0% 3.3 9.1% 30_i 2 Las Vegas 26,2 74.8% 2.5 7.2% 2.0 5 6% 33.0 3 Denver 23 4 52.4% 0.7 1.5% 9.0 20 2% 44.7 4 Los Angeles esaln 8.7 38.9% 5.7 25.5% 3.0 17.3'7. 22.2 5 Chids00 26 7 71 7% 5.3 14 3% 3.9 10.4% 37.2 I S Washington Baltimore 102 55.6% 3.2 17.4% 2.5 13.5% 18.3 7 San Fran dsca Bay Area 8.0 50.1% 2.4 14.8% 3.8 22.6% 10.0 B New York Jr Newark 2 6 20.0% 4.5 35.1% 3.4 26.8% 12.6 9 Atlanta 7 7 41.5% 0.9 5.1% 0.4 1,9% 16.4 rik 10 Orfert/0/Sanford 4 8 40.4% 2 7 22.7% 1.6 13_3% 11.9 11 PhoerVii,Mesa 10 9 73.3% 1.7 11.8% 0 9 8.4% 14.9 12 New Orleans 4.1 63.2% 1.2 19.3% 0.6 12.8% 8.4 13 South Ronda 1 1 21.5% 2.0 38.6% 0.7 14,2% 5.3 I 14 El Paso 2 3 50 7% 4.8 39.5%% 0.4 0.8% 4.5 15 Seattle Tacoma 1.6 25.2% 1.2 MTV. 0.9 14.5% 6.5 16 San Diego 3.4 49,4% 1.3 18.4% 0.8 11.7% 6.9 17 St Lows 8.3 81.4% 1.7 16.4% 0_2 1.81p 10.2 I 18 Kansas City 5 9 84.9% 1 0 15.1% 0.0% 6.9 19 Au4tin2.6 67.81 0.9 239°70 0.3 8.4% 36 20 San Antonin 2.9 65.6% 1.2 27,1% 0.3 7.3% 4.5 21 BOslon 1.2 27.7% 1.8 37.7% 0.8 17.4% 4.4 I22 Philadelphia 0 B 25.49'i 1.6 4e.2% 0.4 11 6% 3.523 Cancun02 fi.7% 1.5 47.7% 1,1 36.6% 3.1 24 Minneapolis 0 7 16.8°i 0.7 16.3% 0.3 7.0% 4.0 25 Charlene 0.6 14.1% 15 38.5% 0.3 7.714 3.9 26 Tampa)St.Petersburg 1.4 40.6% 0 6 24.4% 0.6 17.9% 3.4 27 Detroit 13 26.6% 0.7 14.3% 0.2 4.6% 4.9 28 Midland!Odessa 1.2 74.0% 0.4 26.0% 0 0 0.0% 1.6 ' 20 Lubbock 12 71 4% 0.5 28.2% 0.0 0.4% 1.7 li 30 Nashville 1.5 49 2% 1.0 34.6% 0.2 5.7% 3.0 31 Albuquerque 1.2 491% 10 41.3% 02 8.3% 2.3 32 Seulh Texas 2 8 79 6'/, 0.1 3.8% 0.8 16.6% 3.5 33 Portland.OR I 1 32 7% 0.5 14.7% 0.5 15.9% 3.3 34 Sall Lake Clay 0.8 21 2/ 0.3 6.8% 0.2 6.4% 3.9 35 Satxamanto 2.0 57 b% 0.5 14.1% 0.7 20.5% 3.4 36 Dallas 1 Ft.Worth 0.0 9.9% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 37 Amarillo 0.3 42 4% 0 4 57 6% 0.0 0.0% 0.6 k. 38 Huntsville 0.0 0.0% 1.1 45.2% 0.4 15.6% 2.4 39 Pittsburgh 0.4 24 3% 06 33.1% 0.3 18.0% 1.8 40 Bullhead City 1 Laughlin 0 9 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 3.6 41 Reno 2 1 63.7% 0.5 13 9% 0.5 14.4% 3.3 I 42 Tulsa 0.0 0.0% 00 00% 0.0 0.0% 0.6 43 lc gh l0urham 0.2 35.1% 0 1 21.6% 0.1 10.1% 0.6 44 Honolulu 0 0 0.0% 0 5 52 8% 0.4 35.2% 1.0 ,i1 45 Columbus 0.7 41.8% 05 296% 0.2 10.5% 1.6 46 Jadrs0n lie 0.2 24.6% 04 348% 0.1 5.2% 1.0 47 Norfolk!Hewpart News 0.2 15.9% 0 2 18.4% 0.1 7.3% 1.2 46 lndlanapolis 0.2 22.3% 0,3 41.0% 0.1 14.7% 0.8 49 San Juan 0.3 16.8% 0 7 35 1% 0.3 15.8% 1.9 1 50 Little Reek 0.7 47.4% 0.8 52 6% 0.0 0.0% 1.5 1 1 lal r n.q P 1f W+$1i r,.,. 777 1 4 i 5-. @ 7 1'5 9 t 1. 469 4 paired with page 44 n; L.:II' r°+_ .-...,1•..ii; 1 l .r,.l '•. rats rr'f..r,i f. rlV. page 43 a.r_ .nrngc PAGE 89 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F . Air Carrier Usage at 50 Largest True O&O Passenger Markets at OKC Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample-Directional Journeyed Passengers Avila.''Mi.Hgriu. t1MI.' - A ., I 1.III FinnsAirrv!'NIt'rc�A{t,n P11!W Si,..r.; r,... rr�; 1-'; r: �r;r:� 1 Houston 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 35.1 i 2 Las Vegas 1.2 3.4% 3.1 8.9% 0.0 0.0% 33.0 3 Dower 0.0 0.1% 11.5 25.7% 00 0.0% 44.7 4 Los Angeles Basin S.3 6.0% 2.6 11.6% 0.1 0.6% 22.2 5 Chicago 1.2 3.1% 0.1 0.4% 00 0.0% 37.2 • 6 Washington/Baltimore 2.4 13.2% 0.0 0.3% 00 0.0% S8.3 7 San Francisco Bay Area 1.1 6.8% 0.9 5.7% 0 0 0.0% 18.0 11 8 New York 1 Newark 2.3 17 7% 0.l 0.4% 0.0 0.0% 12.5 9 Atlanta 9.5 51.4% 0.0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 18.4 10 Orlando(Sanford 1.6 13.2% 0.0 0.4% 0.0 0.0% 11.0 11 Phoenix!Mesa 0.4 2.4% 0 9 6.1% 0 0 0.0% 141 II 12 New Orleans 0.3 4.9% 0.0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 8.4 13 South Florida 1 3 25 5% 0.0 0.2% 0.0 0.0% 5.3 14 El Paso 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0%, 4.8 11 15 Seattle 1 Tacoma 0.7 10.73' 1 8 27.2% 9.2 3.7% 0.5 16 San Diego 0.3 3 8% 1 1 16.7% 0.0 0.0% 4.9 17 StLo.s 0.0 0.4% 00 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 10.2 18 Kansas City 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 00 0.0% 0.0 19 Austin 0.0 0.0% 00 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 31 20 San Antonio 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 4.5 21 Roston 0.7 17 1% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 4.4 22 Philadelphia 0.6 15.3% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 3.5 111 23 Cancun 0.2 5.0% 0 0 1 0% 0.0 0.0% 3.1 24 Minneapolis 2.2 53.9% 0 2 6 0% 0.0 0.0% 4.0 25 Cnarlotle 1.6 39.7% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 3,9 I 28 Taal pa/St.Petersburg 0.6 16.7% 0.0 0 3% 0.0 0.0% 3.4 ' 27 Detroit 2.6 54.1% 0.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0% 4.0 26 Midland/Odessa 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.6 29 Lubbock 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.7 i i 30 Nashville 0.3 10,4% 0.0 0 2% 0.0 0.0% 3.0 31 A1buque0q00 0.0 0.2% 0.0 1.1% 0.0 0.0% 2.3 32 South Texas 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 3.5 33 Poland,OR 0.4 12.9% 0.7 22.4% 0.0 1.3% 3,3 34 Salt Lake City 7.9 50.2% 0.6 15.4% 0.0 0.1% 3.0 35 Sec ramenlo 0.3 7.6% 0.0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 3.4 3$ Dales/F1.Wonn 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 37 Amanita 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.6 1 38 Huntsvine 0.9 39.3% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.4 39 Pittsburgh 0.4 24,7% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.8 40 Bcehead City Laughlin 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0,0% 0 0 0.0% 3.8 41 Rena 0.3 5.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 3.3 42 Tutsa 0.0 0.0% 0 0 0,0% 0.0 0.0% 0.8 43 Raleigh/Durham 0.2 33.3% U 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 0.5 44 Honolulu 0.1 11 1% 0.0 0 7% 0.0 0.2% 1.0 45 Columbus 0.3 18.1% 0 0 0 0% 0.0 0.0% 1.8 • 46 Jacksonville 0.4 35.5% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.0 47 Norfolk 1 Newport News 0.7 56.8% 0.0 1.6°1 0.0 0.0% 1.2 II 48 Indianapolis 0.2 21.5% 0-D 0.5% 0.0 0.0% 0.8 49 San Juan 0.6 32.3% 0 D 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 11 50 Little Rock 0.0 0.03'e 0.0 0,0% 00 9.0% 1.5 Tray I•rir V[ �. tit:.r l"'1.`. I:Y`. 7='.• `.. :. •l '1 al'}G paired with page 43 page 44 PAGE 90 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F f fil Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at OKC Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approdmot41 100i,Sample Duesliana'Journeyed Pasaergere la Arr port.h''uIl 1 L 5a.:[lra.e51 A:rcr tine Un:red AverJcJ L• r F1,1 nk A. !r^rnn Aria RI71-W Fa:4 t:]}L"7 ,• RpFW Fero ram 1 Houston 14,969 $155 5103 5143 $569 5173 515E 2 Las Vegas $4,648 $177 $497 $198 $101 $203 $177 II 3 DenverS2,3B1 $102 $1O8 $157 $1.326 $147 MO Loa Argeba Basin 51,706 $187 $1,450 $256 $932 $242 $245 5 Chicago $3,768 5142 $1,Os9 5199 $829 $213 1160 I 6 Washington i Baltimore 51,964 $193 $684 $214 $559 $225 $203 7 San Francesco Bay Area 11,683 $209 $534 5225 5881 $243 $219 8 New York Newark 5458 $178 $966 S214 5898 5251 $226 9 Atlanta $1,019 $133 $170 $179 S54 5177 $166 N 10 Orlando i Sanford $773 S160 $501 $185 $300 $189 5169 11 Phoenix Mass 12,024 $186 $311 $178 $171 $160 $181 12 New Oneans $763 $188 5235 5190 $181 5224 $19 13 Sown Florida $210 $185 $457 $224 1175 5234 $224 N 14 El Paso $473 1209 $377 $213 :111 $254 $215 15 Seattle Tacoma $356 $220 $274 $227 $224 5239 $217 16 San Diego $678 $200 $268 6228 $184 5228 $201 17 St Louis $1,233 $149 $245 5148 $29 $161 $149 I t8 Kansas C#ty 11,111 5189 $249 5240 50 30 $187 19 Austin $434 S167 son $180 S62 $195 $172 20 San Antonio $526 $180 $213 $175 S75 $229 $162 21 Boston 5240 5190 S388 5235 $190 $250 $236 N 22 Philadelphia $205 $230 $409 $253 5109 $269 $282 23 Cancun $47 5222 $381 $256 8316 $277 $262 24 Minneapolis $117 $174 S145 $222 $61 $215 $234 25 Charlotte s87 $156 $363 $239 567 $219 1204 I 26 Tampa lSi Petersburg $267 $191 $783 5218 $144 $233 S217 27 QetaQil $202 $155 $136 $194 $47 $209 1219 26 Mid and f Odessa $214 $185 $94 $230 $0 $0 $197 29 Lubbock 5190 $158 $74 $155 S2 $317 $157 30 Nasnvlle $302 $205 $229 $221 $42 $250 $217 31 Albuquerque $223 $193 $172 $177 $48 $245 $196 32 South Texas 5529 5190 $26 $193 $131 $226 $195 33 Porttand,OR $218 $201 $110 $226 $123 $232 5286 34 Salt Lake City $134 $164 $55 $209 $53 $218 1194 35 Sacramento $409 5207 5109 $226 S165 $235 $216 36 Da8ac/Ft Worth S0 50 50 10 SO SO SO 37 Amarillo $44 $185 S07 $166 SO SO $177 38 Hunts+ntta 50 $0 $314 1292 $86 $231 $270 39 Pittsburgh $94 $222 $140 $240 sal $276 $249 40 Bullhead City Laughlin s0 10 $0 S0 $0 SO $211 41 Reno $471 $224 $124 $271 $104 $218 $231 42 Tulsa $0 $0 50 50 s0 s0 s0 43 Raleigh Ourham $46 $217 $36 $263 $16 $250 S246 44 Honolulu $0 SO 3241 $443 S176 $484 11467 45 Columbus $145 5227 5115 S249 S44 5266 $242 46 Jackksonwlle $49 5198 574 $210 314 $270 $229 47 Nartiolk+Newport News $39 $213 152 $243 $19 5225 $283 48 Indianapolis $39 $205 $73 $213 130 $244 $224 49 San Juan S51 $160 5173 $259 582 $273 $250 50 Little Rods S121 S174 1140 $181 S0 S0 $172 Tom!true PDE W:Share $36 841 5166 $20.128 5248 516.551 5274 $213 paired wIh page 46 .:4:.'1:1:.11`..':IL$n rr a',:1 `.1:1• Il .. .i _ I. .1 i',.s' 1•.. page 45 1 PAGE 91 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Airline Revenue and Average Fares at 50 Largest True O&D Passenger Markets at OKC Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample-DireCttoral Journeyed Passengers q•roo"i V,Ilr.14. V.r,,,r Fr Lid., a', ..r A.+.r,4r,_ Hank hrrp::irr'4grrt.Are,' Rrlti.'Nr r rCwV ..r. Y- LW f.v,r- .,•. 1 Hausion $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $156 2 Las Vegas $232 S193 $421 $135 $0 $0 $177 I/I 3 Denver $6 5164 $1,041 $91 $0 $0 $101 4 Los Angeles Basin 1295 $223 $3660 $139 $39 $277 $215 5 Chicago $210 $180 516 $111 $0 $0 $lea 6 Washington 18atlmase $513 $212 $7 $151 S0 $0 $243 7 San Frand9Ca Bey Area $274 $751 $135 $148 S0 5104 $211 8 Now York 1 Newark S576 $254 18 $163 $0 $0 $226 9 Atlanta Si.838 $194 Si S210 SO S0 $108 10 Orlando)Sanford $344 5219 S8 $158 30 Sd 2166 11 Phoenix/Mesa $83 5178 S118 $131 50 S0 $161 12 New Orleans $77 5246 S0 50 SO SO $116 13 South Florida $340 $253 Si $176 S0 S0 $2224 14 El Paso $0 50 $O $0 S0 $0 1215 15 Seattle/Tacoma $191 3277 1294 $168 $63 $283 $217 16 San Diego $56 $217 $171 $149 $0 SO $261 17 StLouls $8 3184 $0 SO SO $0 $141 ' 18 Kansas City $0 $0 SO SO So S0 $197 19 Austtn $0 $0 SO so $0 50 3172. 20 San Antonio 10 S0 S0 S0 $0 SO 1152 21 Boston $213 $285 SO $0 $0 $0 $236 22 Phltedefot.a $158 $278 $0 $0 $0 $0 #52 23 Cancun $85 $261 $8 $247 $0 SO $262 24 Minneapolis $5e8 $271 $33 $135 $0 50 5334 25 Charlotte $289 1185 $0 $0 $0 $0 3214 26 Tampa r St.Paterabur9 $137 $237 II $131 S0 $0 $213 27 Detroit 5682 $258 S2 $129 SO 50 $219 28 Midland(Odessa $0 $0 $0 $0 S0 $0 $157 29 Lubbock 50 $0 S0 $0 SO 50 $157 30 Nash4s $75 $240 $1 $148 SO $0 $217 31 Albuquerque 51 5345 $3 $112 SO $0 $190 32 South Texas $0 SO 10 SO SO $0 $196 33 Portland.OR $102 5239 $119 $160 $12 $266 $208 34 Salt Lae City $427 $221 $80 $131 $1 $220 $194 35 Sacramento $56 $215 $O S0 S0 SO $216 36 Dallas/Ft,'Monti 50 10 50 SO SO 59 S0 I 37 Amarillo S0 S0 $0 SO S4 $0 $177 38 Huntsville 5243 $260 30 $0 S0 $0 $270 39 Pittsburgh $117 5270 SO SO SO S0 1241 40 BuHhesd City/Laughlin SO S0 50 $0 $0 $0 $201 41 Ram $55 $247 50 SO SO 50 $231 42 Tulsa 50 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 43 Raleigh t Durham $58 $265 SO $0 SO SO $r246 44 klonolulu $53 3458 $4 $510 $1 $369 $467 45 Columbus Ill $252 SO SO SO S0 $242 46 Jacksonville $95 $264 $0 SO SO S0 S229 47 Norfolk 1 Newport News 5160 $273 53 $167 SO $0 $253 48 Indianapolis $44 $248 $1 S162 $0 $0 $224 48 Sen Juan $169 S278 $0 S0 SO SO $256 50 little Rods S9 50 SO $0 SO S0 $178 Y -PTA1 in,a DEW Fai,. 53c '::r GL _:n;M 51:' .)»a $:c::i paired wrlh page 45 page 44lilliCrtt...r PAGE 92 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F II Section 4: Competitive Airports within the Region 1 okc j I1 i+ LAW y SIIIIS I I f VW DAL 1 1 I • Dallas Forl Worlh International Airport is 122 mites and a I hour 50 minute drive from Wichita Falls. I • Wit Rogers World Airport is 134 miles and a 1 hour 55 minute drive from Wichita Falls. 1 • Dallas Love Field is 137 miles and a 2 hour 2 minute drive from Wichita FQIIs. 1 ° Page 47 rt}yrrr e.v,wn.^a w>w e., PAGE 93 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Wichita Falls Has Non-Stop Service to 1 Destination with a June 2015 Average of 4.0 Departures and 200 Seats per Day Service at SPS s; Alf , 1 .. ,f $ Py' .. lJ«,, � 66 p, ° f• i Comparisons SP5 SP5 SPS "includes LAW Catchment'* True Market Region' , Population-YE 3Q 2014 433,056 433,056 29.466,189 Personal Income i$millionsl $15.576 $15,576 $1.173.612 Earnings($millions! $10,758 $10,758 $899,847 y O&D Passengers YE 30 2014 95.540 496,220 41 292,390 E o c O&D Passengers per Capita-YE 30 2014 0.22 1,15 1.40 a Q LU O&D Passengers per$mi lion Income-YE 3Q 2014 6.13 31.86 35.18 u a O&D Passengers per$rniltian Earnings-YE 30 2014 8.88 46.12 45.89 'Wichita Foe Region includes Qk(ohoana ono re%as ,_„ 1 Page 48 . Er+NOY Ce..uAry Group w, PAGE 94 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F II Dallas/Ft Worth Has Non-Stop Service to 204 Destinations with a June 2015 Average of 1.152 Departures and 140.696 Seats per Day II Service at DFWii • 4 � ,, w.ee '� } �tit i �� L 19 Jj -z. 77 11' 6 "4 ap #. ti {r ,, ,,�..,+y F... r � Idr j: �' ,�d-of r.-�,� ■ ,," * t•P f� ,,. fir°. �{ 1. x �. w w l R ins lir' it r�� v 7 .� k 7C.,�` ry4 r nr1 ` 4 - I -.-. •_, ' x J.,ry , 'Iwo. ivy Comparisons 1 SPS DfW/DAL SPS True Market Catchment Region' MPopulation-YE 3Q 2014 433.056 7,345,780 29.466.189 Personal income($millions) $15.576 $73,1 57 $1 173.612 1 Earnings($millions) $10.758 $54,077 $899 847 1 O&D Passengers•YE 3Q 2014 496,220 14.675.580 41.292.390 = O&D Passengers pet Capita• YE 3Q 2014 1.15 2.00 1,40 _o 1 n w O&D Passengers per$million Income YE 30 2014 31.86 200.60 35.18 it tr 1 a. 08 D Passengers per$million Earnings-YE 30 2014 46.12 271.38 45.89 1 wr,.nit,F,,us Region include,41c•or ,-o ond rrxos DFW=DFW+DAL r ' Page 49s4.erte.�u,n.444•ew,- PAGE 95 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Oklahoma City Has Non-Stop Service to 21 Destinations with an June P 2015 Average of 68 Depts and 6,739 Seats per Day Service at OKC 1 q Y iS �r 't 4�d :T � 4 MCP . to fr'� ,�� S.rr7 ",:°,10,,,, - M ,y, } y r r� !` A1n1. 1� l' r ^ .'� ., o ^^z as r el..�'. • >.i i� irk- S .,' p' �' 1,.w Ity .r.,.-;4.)1#.,.r.,';/..v."-i./.4 i i i1'r.!-.,. , yr_ ��a, r ti Ea..m ° i ,- r 4 fi, 1 r�, er1+ ', -fir .�.;. 0°.,. x a , rat.. .- ,. I ! Comparisons I SPS OKC SPS True Market Catchment Region' Population-YE 30 2014 433.056 1.912.682 29,466,189 Personal Income i$miilions) $15,576 $73,157 $1.173,612 Earnings($miilionsi $10,758 $54.077 $899,847 1 m O&D Passengers YE 30 2014 496.220 1,709,560 41,292,390 E a) c O&D Passengers per Capita-YE 34 2014 1.15 0.89 1.40 C7 Q c w O&D Passengers per$rrtlion Income-YE 30 2014- 31.66 23.37 35.18 a O&D Passengers per$rnillion Earnings-YE 3Q 2014 46.12 31.61 45.89 •wiehifa FaNs Region includes Oklahoma and Texas Page 50 Vi-srw,aRwm,roi aaa.+.. PAGE 96 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F ri Potential Pax/Rev Flows over Air Carrier Hubs tolfrom the Wichita Falls Area Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approximates 100%Sample-Duect'cnal Joumeyed Bassani ars ri , n,pill i I 1110111110 [r,u.,,r a,,,,•,4,��. 1+.,,„i�:.•:u,,.�� Lc.„ �,,,r�,. Ran'., 1,rl1r Wild A,p., POEW RISEW PS31'VJ RCEW FCEv', RgF'W Share of Pax r R.v e:n Hub 88 2% i9 4 E1 2% ",d 21 42 2% 35 9're J1 HOualOn 90 9 $13,639 90.9 513.639 0.0 SO 2 Las Vegas 70 4 $12.010 0.0 S0 70 4 $12.010 3 Denver 64.4 57.483 0.0 50 64.4 57,453 4 Los Angeles Basin 59.0 112,188 59.0 $12,788 59.0 $12,188 5 Chicago 55.8 59,336 55,8 ;9.336 00 $0 6 WashinglonrBaltimore 47.4 S10.704 47.4 $10.704 47.4 $10,704 7 San Franclsco Bar Area 42.0 58,560 42.0 $8.560 42.0 58.566 I 8 New York l Newark 41.8 $10,033 41.6 510,033 41.6 $1O.Q33 9 Atlanta 379 $6.703 37.9 58,793 0.0 SO 10 Orlando'Sanford 33.6 55.804 33.6 $5,804 0.0 SO 11 Phoenix!Mesa 32.6 $5.885 0.0 10 32.6 $5,685 12 New Weans 30.1 14,092 30.1 54.092 10. ri 13 South Florida 27.0 $5 117 27 O 55.117 0.0 SO 14 El Paso 25.6 $4 505 0 0 $0 0.0 $0 75 Sean!®:Tacoma 23.6 55,449 23 5 55,449 23.8 55,449 I 16 San Diego 22 3 $4-444 22.3 $4,444 22.3 $4,444 i 7 St Louis 19.9 $3.256 0 0 SO 0 0 50 18 Kansas City 18.2 $2 980 0 0 $0 0.0 SO 19 Aua5n 18.2 $2.661 0 0 SO 0.0 $0 I 20 San Antonio 15.0 $2 950 0.0 $0 0.0 S0 21 8astdn 17 8 53.700 17.6 13,700 17-6 53.700 22 PhiEadelptva 18.7 $3.642 15.7 53.642 16.7 53,842 23 Canaxi 16.2 $3.781 16.2 $3.701 0.0 $0 I 24 Minneapolis 15.3 S3,058 0.0 50 15,3 53,056 25 Charlotte 15.0 53.394 15.0 53.394 0.0 $0 26 Tampa,St Potersbur9 14 8 $2,715 14.8 $2.715 0.0 SO I 27 Delroa 13.4 52.760 134 52,780 13.4 52.780 28 Midland I Odessa 0.0 SO 0 0 $0 0.0 SO 29 Lutrlx ek 0 O $D D D $0 0.0 SO I 30 Nashville 11.3 $2.114 113 S2,154 0,0 S0 31 Albuquerque 10.1 S1,612 0.0 50 0.0 50 32 South Texas 9.5 $1,533 95 $1,533 0.0 Sit 33 Portland OR 9.5 $1,994 9 5 $1,904 9.5, $1.994 34 Sall Lake City 0.5 $1.074 0.0 $0 9.5 $1,974 35 Sacramento 90 $2,164 9.0 52,164 9.0 $2.164 36 Dallas:Ft Worth 7 9 1636 0.0 so 0.0 $0 37 Amarillo 0.0 50 0.0 $D 0.0 SO 38 Huntsvri:e 7.4 $2,107 7.4 12,107 0.0 S0 39 Pitlsburgh 7.3 51.708 7.3 51,705 7.3 $1.708 40 Bu'thaad City I Laughlin 0.0 SO 0.0 50 4.0 $0 41 Reno 1 #t539 7.1 51,539 7.1 51.539 42 Tulsa 0 0 SO 0.0 $O 00 S0 y 43 Ralalgh,Durham 6.1 $1.377 6.1 $1,377 0.0 $0 44 Honolulu 5.9 $2.684 5.9 52,684 5.9 $2 4$4 45 Columbus 59 $1,235 5.9 51,235 0,0 SO 46 JsdlSornn118 5.9 51.221 5.9 $1,221 0.0 S0 1 47 Norfolk r Newport News 5.9 $1,496 5.9 51,496 0.0 $D 48 Indtanapol� 5.8 51,136 5.8 $7,1T8 0.0 S0 49 San Juan 56 S1.481 5.6 51.481 0.0 10 50 Little Rock 5 4 5856 0.0 S0 0.0 SO 1 T,:•el 1:,.,PM-W,Rfirw +i4`r 5'.13 51; 837 5118-721 573 S119.333 paired with page 52 -.,,_I• i'ul CC,C]i•,;;I i:.f):?11- ."rci•;.:.,i,illy I::ress, fi l - PAGE 97 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F . ,,•a; '.1.. Potential Pax/Rev Flows over Air Carrier Hubs to/from the Wichita Falls Area , Twelve Months Ended September 2014 Approldmales 100%Sample-Dlrac1tonal Jo ism eyed Pasaer%]ars A,r:nrl',aulrrle'' Al:1 m,1.,k 0v1,., 11.:k•'' ,.,.r:or1 rC,•iru t;ia PD EW RML5': lIJLt' Mil l'' P .:'rV R BE'11 I Share or P;,z'Rev via Huh 30 C°L 33 3', 36 S 3 41.15e 35 3°.', 3,9'.'. 1 Houston 0.0 SO 0.0 S0 0.0 SO 2 Las WOOS 70 4 $12,010 0.0 SO 70.4 $12.010 3 Deng 64.4 S7,483 0.0 SO 64.4 57.483 4 Los Ang0101 Bosh 59.0 Si 2,188 0.0 so 59.0 $12,188 5 Chicago 0.0 SO 0.0 SO 0.0 $0 6 Washr19ton/5al6more 47.4 510.704 474 510.704 47.4 510.704 7 San FrancIeco Bay Area 42 0 58.560 0.0 50 42.0 58.560 8 New York/Newark 41.8 110.033 41.8 410.033 41.8 $10,033 9 Manta 00 50 37.9 $6,793 0.0 $0 10 Orlando+Sanford 00 50 33,6 55.804 0.0 SO II Phoenix r Mesa 32 6 55.885 0.0 S0 32.6 55,885 12 New Orleans 0 0 3P 0.0 S0 0.0 S0 ' 13 South Florida 0 0 50 27❑ $5,117 0.0 ED 14 El Paso 0 0 $u 0.0 50 0.0 50 15 Seatlre i Tacoma 23 8 55.449 0.0 SO 23.8 55,449 16 San Diego 22 3 $4.444 0.0 SO 22.3 54,444 17 St Louis 0.0 50 0.0 $0 0.0 TO ' 18 Kansas City 0 0 SO 0.0 50 0.0 $0 19 Austin 0.0 SO 0.0 S0 0.0 SO I 20 San Anionto 0 0 SO 0.0 S0 0.0 50 21 Boston 17 6 43.700 17,6 43,700 0.0 SO 22 Philadelphia 16.7 53.642 16 7 $3.642 0.0 40 23 Cancun 0 0 $0 16 2 53.781 0.0 $0 24 Minneapolis 15.3 $3,058 0.0 S0 15.3 53,058 25 Charlotte 0.0 SO 15.0 $3,384 0.0 50 , 26 Tampa+St,Petersburg 0.0 S0 14.8 S2,715 0.0 SO 27 Detroit 13..4 42,780 13.4 $2,780 13.4 52,700 28 Midland 1 Odessa 0 0 S0 0.0 50 0.0 SO 29 Lubbock 0 0 $0 0.0 SO 0.0 SO 30 Nashville 0.0 50 113 52,154 0.0 S0 31 Adnuqueroue 0.0 $0 0.0 S0 0.0 50 32 Scull loess 0.0 S0 0 0 50 0.0 S0 33 Portland,OR 9.5 51.994 0.0 50 9.5 51.994 34 Salt Lake City 9.5 $1,974 0.0 SO 9.5 St•974 35 Sacramento 9.0 42.164 0.0 50 0.0 50 36 Dallas/Ft.Worth 0.0 S0 0.0 50 0.0 SO 37 Amarillo 00 SO 0.0 50 0.0 50 38 Huntsville 00 40 7,4 $2,107 0.0 SO 39 Pittsburgh 7 3 51.708 7.3 $1,708 0.0 $0 40 Bultheud Ciiy/Laughlin 0.0 50 0.0 50 0.0 $0 41 Reno 7 1 51,539 0.6 50 0.0 50 42 Tulsa 0.0 50 0.0 50 0.0 SO 43 Raleigh/Durham 0.0 SO 6.1 41,377 0.0 50 44 Honolulu 0 0 S0 5.9 52.684 0.0 SO 45 Columbus 0 0 S0 5.9 51.235 0.0 SO 46 Jacksonville 0.0 SO 5.9 51,221 0.0 40 47 Norfolk i 14pAport News 0 0 50 5.9 $1,498 5.9 41,498 48 Indianapolis 0 0 10 5.8 51.118 0.0 S0 49 San Juan 0.0 $0 5.6 $1.481 0.0 40 50 Little Rock 0.0 40 0.0 50 0.0 40 lohr' t .0 POLA? Rtiill7 12: _'r; ,:r, .1;,. :. .. _'+h paired MIA page 51 r- . I ? page 52 1 PAGE 98 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Conclusions / Contact Information Conclusions The resulls of this True Market Study show that the calcnment area currently produces roughly 992,439 total a ri ne passengers per year,or 1.360 passengers per day each way, This study also shows that the Wichita Falls area currently produces about$224-0 m7ion in current annual airline revenue,or$306,856 in airline revenue per cloy each way. A minority of these passengers use the Wichita Falls Regional Airport far !heir travel 9.2% faking flights that depart or arrive local y. About 34.6%of Wichita Fals area passengers use Dallas Fart Worth Inferno lion al Airport I Ii is important to nate that even:t drFFne service is offered at Wichita Falls,corlines serving Wichita Falls Regional Airport may not realize the tuti number of passengers and the full amount of revenue represented In this True Market Study. Wh'le these numbers represent what the market currently produces for oirtnes at Wichita Falls Regional Airport and other airports combined,ii does not represent the eventual retention number of service in Wichita Falls. II is not unusual in regional markets like Wichita Falls that the local airport retains only a percentage of the total market,as many travelers still choose to drive to other airports to access the national air transportation system. Stilt the resu is of this sludgy show the potential for hundreds more daily passengers to f yin and out of the Wichita f Falls Regional Arport. Moreover-it's important to nate,this study does not take into account any stimulation of the market through additional service especially service That is priced below similar service found at other airports in the region. Low cost,less-than daily service would also hove the potential 10 pull passengers from other nearby catchment areas to the W chifa Fats Regional A'rport- Passengers from other catchment areas other than Wichita Falls,who might use the Wichita Falls Reg:and Airport,ore not accounted for in this study. The results at the study,ncFcate the Wichita Falls Regional Airport has a passenger market large enough to support additional service. However,th's study alone will not be enough to convince new airlines to begin service. It is likely the Wichita Falls Regional Airport wilt have to offer some kind or risk mitigation program, including fee waivers,morkerng and even ground handling,to convince another amine to launch service a1 Wichita Falls Regional Airport. Contact Mark Slxel President Sixel Consulting Group,no. 1 15411 341.1601 mark @slse lca nsul ling_cam 1 11 Lint i; 1 rill.. I�_•.us page 53 rYtY�.:o.rwi�nJ 4ro�p M< PAGE 99 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Glossary of Terms Available Seal Mlles FASM•s)-Calculated by multiplying total number of seals available by the segment hip mileage. Average Faso-Represented as either Average Fare or Fared Average Fare. Average Fare is calcutaled by dividing total revenues by iota!passengers.fared Average Fares are calculated by dirriding helot revenues by the total number of passengers that pay a fore for their journey. Fared Average Fares etlminale Die dilution effect Mot frequent fliers hove on air Imes. Average Iares represent a one-way lore peed do not include afar/Vallee laces W passenger facility Charger. Clty•Patr•The relationship between the preen city and the destination cily. For exoerple,Sillings•Austin would be a city-pair when a passenger onginares In Billings,connects through Denver,and hos an ultimate desfinolion 01 Aeriirs• Connecting Atrperl-An inlermedlate airport where the passenger spends fewer ihon four hours before enplaning an another leg of a tourney. Consolidated Market-A city or market that has more than one airport Thor provides commercial air service. Coupons Equivalent to a boarding pass. each time a passenger boards an aircraft,a boarding pass,or coupon,is surrendered. Deptanerrtent•A passenger Iha1 is deparling or gelling off a commercial acme. Desllnatian Airport-Any airport wnere the air traveler spends four hours or more. Tors is the PAA definii•on. Enpltmerrment-Ai defined by the FAA,ors enplanement is a passenger boarding a commercial 9kcroll. Gateway A ci•yldirpOrl in which an international passenger deports!arrives in the United Sidles. Illerrary Mlles,The meal number at miles traveled during any given passenger journey.including excess hovel caused by connections to mttlpie Ilip-r s.os opposed to the direct or non-stop mileage between cily-pair end-points, lend Factor-Calculated as the number at revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles Non•Stop Service-Ay travel between two points withoul stopping at an Inlrrrf.Z[fiare airport Onboard Passenger-A passenger That has enplaned/depsaned a commercial olrerall One-Wary Pale-Represents one-half of a round trip lore excluding applicable taxes and passenger facility charges. y11 vrigie DeiRnatlon(O&D)Passengers'Revenuer•O D Passengers are the number of passengers Ihol travel between city-pale end.pamis. Q&A Revenues is the value 10 oil carvers at the tickets purchased for travel between Ihese end paints. For example.a passenger originaling in Billings.traveling Ratio Denver.then connecting In Zre.nverweir on ultimate aesllnalien of AuTP.n Is an O&❑Passenger in lee Bilings-Austin Marker. The confer revenues derived from Ihistourney are dsa credited to Billings and Aesiin Originating Alper!-the❑kporl used by a Traveler tar,the first enpianemenl of a commercial aircraft. Pox•Abbreviation for possenger. PEW/RDEW-Passengers Per Day Ead't Way,Revenue Per Day Each Way. Ravenva fassengar War(SPM e)-Calculated by multiplying the Iota1 nwnber or anaaard poshrrygers by hie segment Trip mileage. Seals Available-The total number of seats provided by the airline serving a particular airport or mule Segment Trip-the total number of nan•slop depanurel or arrivars provided by dirltnes at an airport Yield-Yield determines the average revenues generated per mile during a given journey. sled is calculated by dividing average fore paid by tlinerory mileage Mown. Yield con also be shown as the fared Average Yield,similar to Fared Average Fares explained prevlousy. vr:_I I.: :n• it:rl -.III^, F' . . page 51 PAGE 100 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F I I Appendix A: Retention in SPS Catchment Area by Zip Code Alrporl Retention by Iip Code i Ronk Zip Codeil SPS Other Retention Rank Zip Code SPS Other Retention 1 73505 3,659 135,041 2.6% 31 76380 1.22D 3.333 26.8% ill 2 76308 27.1305 60,081 31.6% 32 76366 1.789 2,764 39.3% 3 76310 25.935 50,325 34.0% 33 73506 81 4.390 1.8% ill 4 73507 1,707 72,764 2.3% 34 76251 0 4,309 0.0% 1 5 73533 81 59,106 0.1% 35 73572 81 3,984 2.0% 6 73521 1.382 56,423 2.4% 36 76270 0 3,902 0.0% 7 76309 11.220 29.187 27.8% 37 73543 244 3,415 6,7% I 8 73501 976 36,423 2.6% 38 73526 81 3.496 2.3% 9 76306 12,846 15,691 45.0% 39 73534 163 3,333 4.7% I 10 76302 12,602 15.203 45.3% 40 73566 81 3,252 2.4% 1 1 I 76354 10.569 16.260 39.4% 41 76360 1.138 2.114 35.0% 73538 81 22.520 0.4% 42 73554 0 3.252 0.0% I 13 76301 7.398 13,415 35.5% 43 73456 0 2,846 0.0% 14 76230 488 17.724 2.7% 44 73491 0 2,683 0.0% I 15 73527 407 17.398 2.3% 45 73552 0 2,602 0.0% 16 76367 5,772 11.707 33.0% 46 73528 81 2.114 3.7% I 17 73503 894 16,341 5.2% 47 76307 732 1,301 36.0% li 18 73055 0 16,992 0.0% 48 76371 163 1,789 8.3% 19 76384 4,634 10,976 29.7% 49 76351 569 1,382 29.2% 20 76311 6,098 7,642 44.4% 50 73573 0 1,870 0.0% Ilk21 76305 4,715 7,642 38.2% 51 73557 325 1.545 17.4% 22 76365 2.276 7.561 23.1% 52 79227 976 813 54.5% 1 23 76255 407 8,862 4.4% 53 76385 407 1.382 22.7% 24 73541 0 8,618 0.0% 54 73522 81 1,707 4.5% 25 73542 488 6,423 7.1% 55 79252 488 1,138 30.0% 1 26 76265 0 6,748 0.0% 56 76239 0 1,545 0.0% 27 73651 0 6,423 0.3% 57 73062 0 1,463 0.0% I28 73502 325 4,715 6.5% 58 76228 325 976 25.0% 29 76389 813 3.984 16.9% 59 73567 0 1,301 0.0% 1 30 73529 0 4,634 0.0% 60 73565 0 1.138 0.0% Page 55 �"rrWlcw,,..n,,.gr,.,,.,.. PAGE 101 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Appendix 11,1 Airport Use by Zip Code: Wichita Falls Usage of SPS Darker green=Larger share of usage at With la Fags f .. '', W"1,-\._ 1 .,---- I I ------N--,, -.•-',4 a ",,,,i,..,1,s.,. IA I/ 0% e 0% • 0% -1-.12% r _r_••••)--,..0-1-1 ' ',i, ',.....,,,---'('''-`'• / • • C.--,1.,,,....,:- - .' all —c- .J ', Dr. 1 • „, f , , . . e • '6, 1 ZS% 4 °% cm . .v& 0 r"' , f, l' —. — Page 56 V+ - Aill PAGE 102 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Appendix C: Airport Use by Zip Code: Dallas/Ft Worth rl! I Usage of DFW Dari(er green=larger share of usage at Dabas,FIWIrt ill I f --L, 1: " 1.v.-, I -',„,, i se i am:, g% .‘• irk--, 1" MS 0 In, '1 ,-_-,.• '4 r n% 1 ! "I%'Yr'% ;4" ('1 -'.' 1_, . . ..r- i ..Z.' 4,, 1.—"'.• '..... r•'. f ."'%•• V A 47:,..r''' 'VA35% I _ , 42% •' l' 24% r'''.•' ''''- ."` % ' (- ::, I e'''`,,: - .0,,,' .- z,, ' 54% ,,, ? -5,•'*,,, I 5..,,' VI% \-',, \'‘,-,4.2'- • (",,,i,./ ..-' sr% ',' . , I ','-'''''-,...-, t-- ----'-' ----------1 j T% ,...,... .. r, A yr' ' 54% 5\ •r".",../ 4,'"'''t,„: I 74% 1 4% 75% 1 i I 1 1 ' i'-tIlr,tii) li01-01 Afl r•Orl-V.iiChliti 1•015. 1,_....,:. , PC,ce'.•57 PAGE 103 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Appendix D: Airport Use by Zip Code: Oklahoma City 11 Llsoge of OKC II Darker green.larger share of usage at Ok ahorna City II 11 .4 ,111:,l---, i 2k% ' xis '' , wmp- 1 4:,f41,...,Att._•',,,., eR,, V 'i - . 1116 32% . 4, , .„ • •, 1`.- .' 4,-4 ' ..4.,.....,--i....,, \1-",..--..L-f 1 1 Z ' 'IL Ll'r ' Lifrrit , , , ,...., , ., LA , ..' 32% j---.-''-,, ,;-.-',..,..•,:.'40 :';',.. '.' '7**".' 1,144' ,,,,, . •...- .4 ,;44.4 0.03,41. .' \ r- r 1 , f. MI% :,t,, 129,,,,.._13' . ...It, l e,--)'-'----'- ' r-••• ..,i7--'7,_ J -\ --\\. ra. 1 • ) ,.. ;..j\ .,-- cill . ;I\ _, -1, ( im '_...., '....-1.' ' ./ --.'\-• T , .r,ii,,,, ef....=-, 1 ? •.----. „ rg ci A 1 '...' • LI -11"'-- .... liPit• 11 . r',.r . . . •• - • • .... Page 53 .r.) I- 4.Firm•La...•Idh,..2.C.ove.IT, PAGE 104 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F Appendix E: Airport Use by Zip Code: Lawton riUsage of LAW Darter green=rarger share of usage al Lawlan il ii li rill { CW II ._. .. 214( 34% 14% j,4O I 1,!% 0.1 1 e% - ,'. 7411 II CP, : ' _H% c....,j 4 4 O% VI f -- 7% _ h J —J 'w� J n [ ex ''', ._, ._.'•,..1 1. t ` I OM 1 1.... • ux 0% ? oti rcll,rr rot,.... .r.r1 .., ..'r, irlt r IrrII _,.Is Page 59 PAGE 105 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F p I 8 Ii ilJ:� ,iCr. PAGE 106 OF 106 PAGES AGENDA ITEM NO.7.F