Loading...
Landmark Commission Minutes - 11/22/2022 'LANDMARK COMMISSION MINUTES November 22, 2022 MEMBERS PRESENT: Michele Derr ■ Chairperson John Dickinson • Member Christy Graham ■ Member Joel Hartmangruber • Member Nadine McKown • Vice-Chairperson Noros Martin ■ P&Z Liaison Janel Ponder Smith • Member Tim Brewer ■ Council Liaison Kinley Hegglund, City Attorney ■ City Staff Terry Floyd, Development Services Director • City Staff Chris Horgen, Public Information Officer • City Staff Karen Montgomery-Gagne, Principal Planner/HPO ■ City Staff Christal Cates, Development Services Assistant ■ City Staff ABSENT: Andy Lee is Member Marcela Medellin ■ Member { GUESTS: Eduardo Fuentes, Contractor • 612/614 Ohio Fr. Joseph Lim.Owner/Applicant • 612/614 Ohio Steve Wood, BYSP Architects • 1300 7'1'Street Derek Brown, Applicant/CWF IT/Building Services Administrator ■ 1300 7'"Street Katrina Lister, Owner/Applicant • 1704 Tilden I. Call to Order, Introductions and Administer Oath of Office Chairperson Michele Derr called the meeting to order at 12:00 p.m. Ms. Derr had Commission members, staff and guests, introduce themselves. II. Review & Approval of Minutes from: October 18th 2022 Chairperson Derr called for review and approval of the October 18th 2022 Landmark Commission meeting minutes. Mr. Noros Martin made a motion to approve the minutes, Ms. Janel Ponder-Smith seconded the motion. Minutes were unanimously approved 7-0. Regular Agenda Item III. Action Item: Design Review — 612/614 Ohio Avenue: Depot Square Historic District Request to retain illegally constructed metal/wood carport in the rear yard, visible from Ohio Avenue and alley: • Materials: metal, wood, concrete/cinder blocks + Roof: standing seam metal Landmark Commission 2 November 22,2022 Request lattice panels on existing chain link fence/gate for additional privacy. Ms. Gagne presented the case and stated the subject property, formerly known as B & B Antiques was located in the heart of the Depot Square Historic District and a contributing structure to the character of the district. The subject property, a 2-story red brick commercial building was constructed in 1913, during the oil boom era. Inventory photos displayed to the Commission show visibility of the carport from both Ohio Avenue and rear alley. Staff received a report of a carport being constructed in the historic district without receiving an approved design review from the Landmark Commission. On October 21st, 2022, a City building inspector found a carport being constructed at the subject property without design review approval and no permits for construction. The building inspector issued a stop work order for an illegal commercial carport and photographed the work already performed. Many violations were found for both zoning and building codes. The zoning violation was related to the setback of the structure. The contractor constructed carport approx. 1 ft. into the presumed interior property line setback. Therefore, this violates city ordinance since required setbacks shall remain free of any building or structure higher than 2ft unless non- combustible materials, etc. The building code violations found were for exterior walls in the 2015 International Residential Code (IRC) stating, carport hybrid structures with combustible materials require a 5ft. setback from property line. A foundation violation also found in IRC 2015 states, "All exterior footings shall be placed at least 12 inches (305 mm) below the undisturbed ground surface." Ms. Gagne advised because no building permits were obtained no assessment was performed before pouring concrete. If the work had been inspected, staff could have ascertained footing depth and rebar requirements. Another violation was for framing and roof slope. Ms. Gagne stated when the stop work order was issued on October 21st, the contractor had not finished the framing. Staff returned to the location at a later date to collect more information from the owner and discovered additional wood framing had been installed to support the roof but not anchored or installed according to Building Code standards. The final violation noted was for the carport roof, violating Section R905.1.2- Slope. "The minimum roof slope for lapped, non-soldered seam metal roofs with applied lap sealant shall be one-half unit vertical in 12-units horizontal (4% slope)." The ceiling bows inward in center and therefore does not have adequate fall to support a ground snow load requirement of 5 Ibs.'lsf Figure R301.2.5 - 2015 IRC. Detailed photos displayed showed views of roofing material, the support/cross beam construction and lack of proper footings, both items in violation of building code. Ms. Gagne noted besides all the violations, the carport does not follow the intent of Wichita Falls Design Review Guidelines. Also visible from the alley were lattice panels attached to the chain link fence and gates for added privacy the owner was petitioning to retain. Photos showed a detailed view of the carport framing and rear masonry wall. Holes had been drilled in preparation for connection/tie into historic brick wall. Owner stated there would be no lag bolts or screws into historic brick material. Ms. Gagne advised the importance of following Design Review Guidelines which recommend avoiding damage to historic brick and penetration only through grout if necessary. • Landmark Commission 3 November 22, 2022 Ms. Gagne concluded the presentation advising the Commission the owner and contractor were present to answer any additional questions. Mr. Hartmangruber asked the contractor Mr. Fuentes how deep the rebar was in the footings. Mr. Fuentes stated they were 18" and filled with concrete. Mr. Hartmangruber asked where he got the figures for the sizing spans and if he followed any codes. Mr. Fuentes stated he followed no codes. Mr. Hartmangruber gave his professional opinion that the carport looked to be a very dangerous structure and didn't think it would withstand the elements, stating there was no cross bracing, no momentum connections which presented a big safety concern. Ms. Ponder-Smith pointed out a large crack down the center of one of the support posts shown in the slide presentation. Mr. Fuentes stated he had not finished construction and that he was going to drill bolts into it down to the existing slab. Mr. Martin pointed out the structure looked dangerous and not professionally constructed. Chairperson Derr stated this structure would not be approved to remain due to the safety element of construction and not having obtained any permits. Mr. Fuentes stated back in the 1990's when he had his construction business he didn't remember permits being required. A member of the Commission stated permits have been required since probably before the 1960's. Mr. Hartmangruber stated he appreciated that the owner was trying to fix up the structure, however, this could not be considered fixing, noting this was a safety hazard not only to the owner but surrounding neighbors as well. Mr. Hartmangruber advised the structure needed to be taken down immediately to the foundation and start from that point with permits and the proper inspections being obtained along the way. Father Lim, the owner, apologized for not having followed the required procedures. He stated his contractor advised him no permits were needed for a carport. { Ms. Graham asked staff if this petition was denied and he returned at a later date with new plans if the applicant would have to wait the minimum time frame to re-apply. Ms. Gagne advised that this case was a unique scenario and that Father Lim would need to craft a new proposal to present a design review request to the Commission. Ms. Gagne's interpretation is that a new application would be sufficiently different enough from what was being presented today that Father Lim would not be required to wait 6-months to re-apply. Ms. Graham introduced a motion to separate the proposal into two items for voting purposes. Ms. Ponder-Smith seconded with a passing vote of 7-0. Ms. Graham made a motion to allow the placement of lattice panels on the existing chain link fence/gate in the rear yard. Mr. Hartmangruber seconded the motion which passed with a 7-0 vote. Chairperson Derr introduced a motion to deny the commercial carport based on it being in violation of building code, zoning ordinance and design review guidelines. Ms. McKown seconded the motion to deny. The Commission had a unanimous vote of 7-0 to deny allowing the carport to remain. IV. Action Item: Design Review — 2908 10th Street: West Floral Heights Historic District Request to Retain an Unauthorized Residential Carport: • Materials: metal framing covered by wood components; front-gable roof design; metal rafter ends; wood elements include: lap siding, columns, soffit/fascia boards and false window frame to mirror house design • Roof— standing seam metal Landmark Commission 4 November 22, 2022 Ms. Gagne presented the case and stated the subject property was actually two separate properties, 2908 & 2910 10th Street. Ms. Gagne stated the owner had worked with staff after the stop work order for the previously constructed metal framed carport to consider .� three potential options. Owner opted to move forward with replatting to combine the two residential lots. The re-plat provided the opportunity for an accessory structure to be considered by the Landmark Commission. Ms. Gagne advised the subject property was a contributing structure located at the north end of the West Floral Heights Historic District. The home was built in 1925 in a Craftsman architecture style. Inventory photos from 2004 show a structure on the former adjacent lot at 2910 10th Street. A photo from June 2018 show the structure gone leaving a vacant lot. Ms. Gagne advised when the district was designated there was a two-story Prairie style home at 2910 10th St; circa 1919. The structure became a life, health and safety concern within the neighborhood with scaffolding on-site for approximately 8-10 years, significant resident complaints and issues with conditions inside the building and on-site resulted in numerous Code violations and City Council ordered the demolition. In July 2021 the applicant started fence construction at 2910 10th St without permits being obtained. City staff issued a stop work order and a design review case was considered by Landmark Commission and later approved for a Eft wood privacy fence/gate outside the 25ft. front setback area. Ms. Gagne stated staff received a report of a carport being constructed without Landmark approval and obtaining the proper permits. On September 21st, 2022 City building inspector met with the owner and issued a stop work order. The owner was advised of three options regarding the framing already constructed: 1. Remove carport framing; 2. Re-plat 2908 & 2910 as one lot to allow the option for an accessory structure; Landmark Corn. approval still required; 3. Remove framing; request approval from Landmark Corn. for rear accessory structure at 2908 10th Street. Ms. Gagne advised the Commission the owner had chosen to purse option #2 and further advised, if approved, the carport must be subordinate in terms of height, massing and form to the historic, primary residence while also using complementary materials to be mindful of the historic and architectural character of the houses in this block. The owner also requested a metal standing seam roof that would be visible from 10th Street in place of a composition shingle roof. Current framing will not support a composition shingle roof and adds cost to the project. Staff worked with the owner on his plans to retain the carport to replicate the look of his historic home. Rather than use wood for roof beams, he would like to use metal and paint white to match the residence. The owner was attempting to ensure the materials used would reflect those historically present in the district. Ms. Gagne stated research showed secondary structures in the district were of a much smaller scale and generally accessed through the alley to rear of the home. Historic setback patterns for carports/garages would have been in the rear-side yards. This was an unusual case because the front setback area throughout the district typically has residential Landmark Commission 5 November 22. 2022 structures but since the former house was demolished there could potentially be a detached carport in the front building area depending on how the Commission interpreted the Design Guidelines. Ms. Gagne advised the Commission the applicant was not present, but she would try to answer any questions. The Commission discussed the case and Ms. Graham stated she had no issues with a metal roof and that there are materials that are metal, made to replicate the look of typical wooden shingles that could be purchased. Ms. Graham made a motion to separate the proposal into two separate items and was seconded by Ms. McKown and passed unanimously 7-0. Ms. Graham made a motion to approve the carport as proposed in the application with metal structural system covered with wood components - square columns, lap siding, soffit/fascia boards, front-gable roof, window proportionate with carport scale, gutters/downspouts on east/west facades, exposed roof beams (painted metal) and color scheme on the 10th St (south facade) consistent with the historic residence at 2908 10th Street. Ms. Ponder-Smith seconded and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Ms. Ponder-Smith made a motion to allow additional construction to support a roof that is either metal shingles or composition shingle that match the color and appearance of the historic residential roof at 2908 10th Street. Mr. Hartmangruber seconded the motion which passed unanimously with a vote 7-0. V. Action Item: Design Review — 1704 Tilden Street: West Floral Heights Historic District Request for façade repair/replacement & stabilization due to deterioration & separation from structure. • Amend approved brick selection Ms. Gagne presented the case and stated the owner/applicant was present and there had been new information received for a change in the requested replacement brick to be discussion during the presentation. Ms. Gagne stated the previous approval from the Commission was in August of 2020, and was beyond the one-year design review renewal timeline, thus the reason for the request to amend. Ms. Gagne advised the subject property was located in the south part of the West Floral Heights Historic District. The structure was constructed in 1920 with the second story being added in 1960. Photos displayed deterioration of all four facades with the north brick veneer separated from main structure and by 2020 had become a life, health & safety concern. Current photos show project has been initiated with brick veneer partially removed from the north and south facades along with the brick chimney. At this time the progress has stalled due to multiple factors including Covid, contractor delays and the brick selection being unavailable. The previously approved replacement brick was Whitesboro #8799, which is no longer available from the vendor, Therefore, the owner had requested to replace all brick with style Libby Mills, however, the owner was concerned the brick selection was too modern with the variation and darker bricks interspersed. The owner has requested the use of Harper Creek option as there is a more uniform color with less variation and believes it will be a • better match with the existing second story painted siding. Landmark Commission 6 November 22. 2022 Mr. Martin asked the owner if all the brick would be replace to which the owner advised yes, all the current brick façade would be replaced. Ms. Ponder-Smith made a motion to accept the requested brick selection amendment of "Harper Creek" that will be used for replacement brick veneer (north, south, east and west facades - 1st story) and the chimney as part of the foundation/stabilization project with the brick veneer remaining unpainted. Mr. Dickinson seconded and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. VI. Action Item: Design Review Renewal/Modification — 1300 7th Street — Memorial Auditorium Building: City Landmark #2 Request for renewal/modification related to the West Wing Foundation Stabilization Project Ms. Gagne presented the case and stated the City's auditorium building was located at 1300 7th Street and a prominent building of Spanish Eclectic style designed by architects Voelcker and Dixon in collaboration with Dallas architects. Lang and Winchell who completed the State Fair Music Hall in 1925. Construction began in 1927 on Memorial Auditorium and its design is a duplication of the Dallas Music Hall. The building was dedicated in 1928 and underwent a major remodel in 1963/1964 with the interior gutted, auditorium walls, ceiling, seating and stage areas updated along with city offices. Staff referenced visuals of the building in postcards, circa 1930-1945 that illustrated the original central block and wings as well as photos from the 1983 city landmark nomination application, prior to historic designation. Inventory photos from 2013 showed the structure essentially unchanged, but in need of maintenance. Photos from the Times Record News archives in 2017 showed significant damage on 1st, 2nd & 3rd floors of the west wing as well as the outdoor stairs spreading and shifting concrete. A comprehensive feasibility study and building needs assessment conducted by BYSP Architects in 2017 stated structural problems related to support columns spreading at the bottom from years of pressure and shifting ground and the 1963/64 2nd floor renovation/addition; concrete floor poured at that time is shifting; walls are shifting away impacting doors, ceilings, windows, etc. In current photos, the continuing exterior damage is visible, particularly stop-gap repairs by the exterior 2nd floor door which is buckling under the weight of the structure. Ms. Gagne advised as work progressed and the deteriorated brick and stucco were removed more damage was revealed. While trying to stabilize the deteriorated foundation additional issues such as cracking in the columns and a cut stem wall from when the exterior door was made from an existing window during the 1963/1964 remodel. Mr. Steve Wood from BYSP Architects stated engineers had to re-evaluate the newly discovered damaged and how best to proceed. Mr. Wood stated they would be replacing and adding a portion of a beam between 2 columns and will have to remove a portion of brick to do so. Initially the proposal was to reuse as much of the removed brick as possible, however, there is a concern there will not be enough salvageable brick to reuse. Therefore, they are requesting to use stucco as a replacement to match the current areas of stucco on the west wall. Ms. Graham introduced a motion to allow minor material modification to an approved design review project allowing use of new brick veneer on the west facade as there will be insufficient salvaged brick to be repurposed after structural repairs; new brick sections will 0 Landmark Commission 7 November 22, 2022 be covered with stucco material to complement the existing stucco sections already on the west wall. Mr. Hartmangruber abstained from voting to ensure no conflict of interest even though not working on this project, he was employed by the architectural firm of BYSP Architects overseeing the stabilization project. Ms. Ponder-Smith seconded the motion which passed with a unanimous vote of 6-0. VII. Action Item: 2023 Landmark Commission Meeting Schedule &Application Deadlines Ms. Gagne presented the proposed 2023 meeting schedule and application deadlines for the Landmark Commission and advised once adopted the document would be available on the City website. Ms. Graham made a motion to adopt the 2023 Landmark Commission Meeting Schedule & Application Deadlines as presented. Ms. McKown seconded with the motion passing unanimously 7-0. VIII. Other Business: a) Monthly Reports Depot Square: Ms. Derr gave the following updates: • Nov. 26th — Small Business Saturday • Dec. 3rd — Jingle & Mingle • Dec. 10th — Cookie Crawl • Dec. 17th — City of Lights Parade & Festival • Now-Dec. 10th — Backdoor Theater, The Best Christmas Pageant Ever Musical • Now-Dec. 18' —Wichita Theater, A Christmas Story, the Musical • Nov. 25th-Dec. 17th —Wichita Theater, A Tuna Christmas • Dec. 2"d & 3`d — Memorial Auditorium. The Nutcracker • Dec. 17th — Kell House, Candlelight Tour • Nov.30th-Dec. 9th— Kell House, Santa House • Dec. 3rd — Kell House, Artist's Market West Floral Heights: Ms. Ponder-Smith gave the following updates: • Turkey Trot Fundraiser— Thanksgiving morning (Nov. 24th) • Kim Tigrett, President of the West Floral Heights Historic District & Janel Ponder- Smith working with Ms. Gagne on historic district awareness efforts. Kell House Restoration/Rehab Project: Ms. McKown, Kell House Museum Curator, provided a final restoration status report and invited members to the official ribbon cutting on Oct. 25'h at 5:00 p.m. b) Updates: • Kell House Restoration/Rehab Project: Ms. McKown stated Chairperson Derr covered in her updates. c) Resources & Periodicals - THC: • Preservation (National Trust) — Fall 2022 d) Design Review — Staff Authorized — Minor Alteration/Repairs • 1404 Grant —WFHHD — HVAC replacement • 1400 Tilden — WFHHD — Foundation/pool repair Landmark Commission i3 November 22, 2022 • 1614 Tilden Front —WFHHD — Roofing permit for composition shingle • 1614 Tilden Rear — WFHHD —Window & siding permits (Landmark authorized) • 2904 Sturdevandt — Morningside NR District— Plumbing permit (information purposes only) • 900 Bluff Street — Kell House Museum— revise existing sign logo/wording IX. Adjourn Next regularly scheduled meeting January 24, 2023 — 12 p.m. Meeting adjourned at 1:28 p.m. 1/..\ -2 - 202--3 Michele Derr, Chairperson Date