Min 08/15/1972 611
Wichita Falls, Texas
Memorial Auditorium Building
August 15, 1972
Items 1 & 2
The Board of Aldermen of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, met in regular
session on the above date in the Council Room of the Memorial Auditorium Building
at 10:00 o'clock A.M., with the following members present:
J. Winston Wallander Mayor
Harry Campsey X
Harrison E. Taylor X
Larry Lambert X
Willard Still X
J. C. Boyd, Jr. X
Mrs. Peggy McCullough X
Gerald Fox City Manager
Albert Nice Acting City Attorney
Wilma J. Thomas City Clerk
The invocation was given by Alderman Taylor.
Item 3
Mayor Wallander noted two corrections to be made to the previous minutes
pertaining to Alderwoman McCullough's name.
Moved by Alderman Lambert that the minutes of the meeting held July 18, 1972,
be approved.
Motion seconded by Alderwoman McCullough, and carried unanimously.
Item 4a
A proposed appropriation ordinance was presented authorizing payment of
claim as awarded by Archer County District Court, in the amount of $4,909.53,
in favor of Tom I. Scott and his minor son.
ORDINANCE NO. 2725
AN ORDINANCE MAKING AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED FUND TO ACCOUNT
NUMBER 81-861-4520, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Moved by Alderman Boyd that Ordinance No. 2725 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Taylor, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
Item 5a
A proposed ordinance was presented establishing sanitary landfill regulations
and user fees. The City Manager explained that there are four areas where costs
of disposal are not being met on a self-sustaining basis. These are as follows:
(1) The commercial user paying a minimum fee and hauling his own refuse.
(2) Commercial users having a container but hauling an occasional load.
(3) Residents and commercial concerns outside the corporate limits of
Wichita Falls.
(4) Contractors and special haulers.
Commercial accounts are now paying a $5.00 minimum fee for disposing of solid
waste. We would propose to allow them to haul up to five tons free of charge.
More than five tons would be charged $1.00 per ton, and added to next month's
water and sewer bill. Occasional users will not be charged.
612
Item 5a, Coned.
' ORDINANCE NO. 2726
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING USE OF THE CITY LANDFILL BY PRIVATE HAULERS
OF TRASH AND GARBAGE; REQUIRING LICENSE; PRESCRIBING FEES; PROVIDING
A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; CONTAINING A REPEALING
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Moved by Alderwoman McCullough that Ordinance No. 2726 be passed. VO.Ms
Motion seconded by Alderman Campsey, and carried by the following vote: ✓
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
2 Item 5b
\I �
A proposed ordinance was presented regulating discharge of industrial waste
,) into the sanitary sewer system. This ordinance was recommended in the 1970 Black
and Veatch report concerning wastewater treatment facilities for Wichita Falls.
It has also been approved by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and the
Wichita Falls Board of Commerce and Industry Industrial Waste Control Ordinance
Task Force.
ORDINANCE NO. 2727
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE DISCHARGE OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE INTO THE
SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM AND THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS BY AMENDING SECTION 23-110 AND 23-209 OF CHAPTER 23 •
OF THE WICHITA FALLS CITY CODE (1967); DEFINING TERMS; REQUIRING
CONTROL MANHOLES; PROVIDING FOR PERMITS FOR DISCHARGING INDUSTRIAL
WASTE INTO A PUBLIC SEWER; AUTHORIZING DISCONNECTION OF WATER AND/OR
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO PERSONS VIOLATING THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING
FOR INSPECTION AND SAMPLING OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE; PROHIBITING THE
DISCHARGE OF CERTAIN LIQUID WASTES INTO PUBLIC SEWERS; REQUIRING PRE-
TREATMENT OF CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL WASTES; PROVIDING AN ABNORMAL SEWAGE
SURCHARGE; AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF THE WATER DEPARTMENT TO DETER-
MINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF PRETREATMENT; MAKING THIS ORDINANCE CUMULATIVE
OF PRIOR ORDINANCES; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND PROVISIONS OF THE
WICHITA FALLS CITY CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Moved by Alderman Still that Ordinance No. 2727 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Taylor, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
Item 6a
J A proposed resolution was presented approving an engineering contract with
Biggs and Mathews for sanitary sewer extensions to serve Fan Coach Company,
Inc., in Arrowhead Industrial District.
RESOLUTION NO. 1331
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS,
TEXAS, THAT:
That certain contract, a copy of which is attached hereto, between the City
of Wichita Falls, as first party, and Biggs and Mathews, Consulting Engineers,
as second party, providing for engineering services as spelled out in attached
contract, for sanitary sewer extension to Arrowhead Industrial District is here-
by approved, and the City Manager is authorized to execute the same for the City.
Moved by Alderman Campsey that Resolution No. 1331 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boyd, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
613
/ficj Item 6b
A proposed resolution was presented appointing Loren B. Bailey, Jr., as
alternate Court Reporter for Municipal Court.
RESOLUTION NO. 1332
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS,
TEXAS, THAT:
Mr. Loren B. Bailey, Jr., is hereby appointed alternate official shorthand
reporter for the Municipal Court of the City of Wichita Falls, who shall hold
such office at the pleasure of the Board of Aldermen of the City. When he is
working in this capacity, his salary shall be the same as that paid to the regular
shorthand reporter.
Moved by Alderman Lambert that Resolution No. 1332 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Still, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
v- Item 6c
LG. ( A proposed resolution was presented updating proposals to property owners
4 j on Kell Freeway.
RESOLUTION NO. 1333
WHEREAS, by the adoption of Resolution No. 1058, the Board of Aldermen of
the City of Wichita Falls has heretofore found that it is necessary to acquire
the property hereinafter described for construction of the Kell Freeway, Project
52-071, and approved the appraised value of such property; and,
WHEREAS, the appraisal of such property has now been updated by the independent
appraiser employed by the Texas State Highway Department to reflect present market
prices, and this updated appraisal has been approved by the Texas State Highway
Department and has been studied by the Board of Aldermen, and a copy of same is
now in the possession of the Director of Public Works and/or Assistant City Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION NO. 1 The project and property to be purchased by Warranty Deed is
as follows:
Kell Freeway, Project 52-071
Warranty Deed
1700 s.f. of Lot 4, Block 67, Southland Addition
Combined total of value approved in this resolution $3,000.00
SECTION NO. 2 The updated value of such property is hereby approved and the
City Manager is hereby authorized to purchase in the name of the Texas State High-
way Department, or the City of Wichita Falls, by Warranty Deed, such tract of land
as shown on the project right-of-way map. The authorized price to be paid for
such tract is the state approved value as determined from the updated appraisal
(rather than the original appraisal approved by the resolution set out above)
made by the independent real estate appraiser employed by the Texas State Highway
Department.
SECTION NO. 3 In the event the City Manager is unable to purchase such tract
for such approved updated value, he is hereby authorized and directed to cause to
be instituted condemnation proceedings to obtain such tract in the name of the
Texas StateHighway Department or the City of Wichitaa Falls.
Mo°L1onbs ec o$6ega$ySaLa ermantCamp ss eyY1and Ncc rried y roes rollowing vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
614
Item 6d
A proposed resolution was presented authorizing the City Manager to execute
a lease agreement with Community Telephone Company for land at Lake Arrowhead to
construct telephone facilities.
RESOLUTION NO. 1334
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, /
TEXAS, THAT:
That certain lease agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, wherein the
City of Wichita Falls leases to Community Telephone Company a tract of land
situated at Lake Arrowhead for use in its telephone system, is hereby approved,
and the City Manager is authorized to execute the same for the City of Wichita
Falls.
Moved by Alderman Boyd that Resolution No. 1334 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Campsey, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
Item 6e
A proposed resolution was presented approving an easement for Community
Telephone Company, Inc., for telephone service at Lake Arrowhead.
RESOLUTION NO. 1335
BE IT RESOLVED THAT BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS,
TEXAS, THAT:
That certain easement, a copy of which is attached hereto, whereby the City
of Wichita Falls grants to the Community Telephone Company, Inc. an easement of
right-of-way for an underground telephone cable at Lake Arrowhead, is hereby
approved, and the Mayor is authorized to execute and deliver the same for the
City of Wichita Falls.
Moved by Alderman Still that Resolution No. 1335 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Campsey, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
Item 6f
A proposed resolution was presented designating a business route for the old
State Highway 79, since the new expressway will be designated State Highway 79.
y RESOLUTION NO. 1336
WHEREAS, State Highway 79 has been relocated as a Freeway connection along
Cottonwood Road from present U.S. 287 "Freeway East" to the Petrolia Highway
secion of State Highway 79 near the east city limits of Wichita Falls, and
WHEREAS, the old State Highway 79 route on East Scott Street, Kell Boulevard,
and Jacksboro Highway will continue to serve a large volume of traffic, and
WHEREAS, we consider it in the public interest that the old route be retained
as a part of the State Highway System.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT: _y
The Texas Highway Department retain the old route of State Highway 79 in
Wichita Falls, as indicated above, on the State Highway System as a business
route loop.
615
Item 6f, Coned.
Moved by Alderman Campsey that Resolution No. 1336 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Still, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
Item 7a
A proposed resolution was presented awarding the bid for sanitary sewer im-
provements for Mimosa Heights to Costello Construction Company, Wichita Falls, in
the amount of $4,399.50.
RESOLUTION NO. 1337
WHEREAS, heretofore the City of Wichita Falls advertised for competive bids
for Sanitary Sewer Improvements in Mimosa Heights Addition; and
WHEREAS, only one bid was received, the bid of Costello Construction Company
of Wichita Falls, Texas, which is a low and good bid.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The bid of Costello Construction Company in the amount of Four Thousand
Three Hundred Ninety Nine Dollars and Fifty Cents ($4,399.50) is hereby accepted,
and the City Manager is authorized to execute, for the City of Wichita Falls, a
contract with said bidder for the construction of such sewer lines.
Moved by Alderman Still that Resolution No. 1337 be passed.
Motion seconded by Alderwoman McCullough, and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Aldermen Campsey, Taylor, Lambert, Still, Boyd, and McCullough
Nays: None
Item 8
Permission was requested to advertise for bids for sanitary sewer extensions
to Arrowhead Industrial District, to serve Fan Coach, Inc.
Moved by Alderman Taylor that authority be granted to advertise for bids,
as requested.
Motion seconded by Alderman Still, and carried unanimously.
�r Item 9a
V' Moved by Alderwoman McCullough that minutes of the meeting of the Board of
Adjustments and Appeals held July 17, 1972, be received.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boyd, and carried unanimously.
Item 9b
Moved by Alderman Taylor that minutes of the meeting of the Planning Board
held July 12, 1972, be received.
Motion seconded by Alderman Campsey, and carried unanimously.
Item 10a
Moved by Alderman Still that water reimbursement payment in the amount of
$494.75, and sewer reimbursement payments in the amount of $1,958.69, be approved
for a total amount of $2,453.44, as follows.
616
Item 10a, Coned.
Hawkeye Development, Water, Section D-2, Exhibit A of University
Park from May 3, 1971 to May 3, 1972; $494.75
University Park Corporation, Sewer, Sections A-2, A-3 and C-1 of University
Park Subdivision from May 1, 1971 to May 1, 1972; $1,760.15
Hawkeye Development, Sewer, Section D-2, Exhibit A of University Park from
May 3, 1971 to May 3, 1972; $198.54
Motion seconded by Alderman Campsey, and carried unanimously.
Item 10b
Mayor Wallander made the following appointments to the Land Use Advisory
Board.
Elvin Dudley Recil Joyce
Bill E. Gowan Lonnie D. Morrison
Herb Appel Robert Seabury
Elie Lam John Mark Hirschi
Ikard Smith Lynn Morrison
Jesse Estrada Michael Maloney
Dr. D. Clifford Burross Henry Dvorken
James Featherston Joe Best
Don Read Rev. W. 0. Bradford
Jerry Estes Jim McDonald
Charlye 0. Farris Tom Foley
Mrs. Keith Nelson Cliff Davis
Moved by Alderman Lambert that the appointments be confirmed.
Motion seconded by Alderman Boyd, and carried unanimously.
Item 11
Price Smith appeared as a representative of the congregation of Bethel
Church of God in Christ, regarding the paving of Smith Street. When this street
was paved,the church property was placed below the level of the street. The
foundation and plumbing have been covered up by the rain. He explained that
they have been in contact with the Public Works Department. Dirt was worked
around to try to help the drainage, but that did not solve the problem. Water
has collected under the church building, causing rats and mosquitoes. They feel
that the only reasonable solution is to raise the church building. Mr. Kelly,
Business Manager of the Church, is proposing a cooperative agreement, with an
overall cost of $1500.00 to raise this building. The congregation is willing to
help in this problem.
Alderman Taylor stated that Mr. Roark (former Director of Public Works)
promised that he would not raise the street to the level where it would damage
the church. He also noted that they did not have flooding before the street
was paved.
Mr. Smith explained that dirt has washed up to almost the level of the
porch. The church sets in a hole. He requested that the City Council appropriate
enough money to raise the church up to the level of the street, to get it out of
the hole. It was his understanding that the church was level with the dirt be-
fore the street was paved. Alderman Taylor stated that accumulation of dirt
has occurred since the street was raised and paved.
Ernest Lillard stated that their engineering is sound, and while they may
have created a problem, they are no different than problems in other areas. In
order to make a grade that cars can traverse, they had to keep the grade somewhat
as it is. The ground under the church is lower than the natural grade. Drain-
age which flows into the church comes from behind the curb and gutter and not
from the street. He explained that the ground could be graded all around the
church, or the church building could be raised, which would require funding to
do. The church was not agreeable with the first proposal. When the street was
5 617
Item 11, Cont'd.
paved, the borrow ditch was filled, and the water which flows behind the curb and
gutter drains to the church, and not from the street.
Mayor Wallander stated that the Council would confer with Mr. Fox and advise
Mr. Smith of their action by letter. Mr. Smith requested that he and Mr. Kelly
be permitted to be present at the conference. This was agreed to.
Moved by Alderman Campsey that the meeting be adjourned.
Motion seconded by Alderman Still, and carried unanimously.
The Board of Aldermen adjourned at 11:00 A.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED this .:06✓ day of , 1972.
•41 °
ayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
•
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WICHITA
This Contract, made and entered into as of the 14th day of
July, 1972, by and between the City of Wichita Falls (hereinafter
called "Owner") and the firm of Biggs & Mathews, Inc. , Consulting
Engineers, Wichita Falls, Texas (hereinafter called "Engineer")
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, a new sewer line and pumping station is proposed to
the Arrowhead Industrial District in the northern part of Wichita
Falls, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the Firm of Biggs & Mathews, Inc. is acceptable to
the Owner and is willing to enter into a contract to perform engineer-
ing services required by the Owner;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows :
I .
The Owner hereby retains the Engineer for all engineering
services required in connection with construction of the sewer line
and pumping station.
II .
The services performed by the Engineer in connection with
proposed improvements shall be divided into three phases , as follows:
Phase 1 - Preliminary study and design necessary to outline
those improvements required.
-1-
•
•
Phase 2 - Preparation of detailed plans and specifications for
improvements included under Phase 1 .
Phase 3 - General administration of construction of improvements
included under Phase 2.
Phase 1 - Preliminary study and design - shall include:
(a) Participation in preliminary conferences with the Owner
regarding the proposed project;
(b) Preparation of preliminary engineering layouts, sketches
and reports required to define needed improvements;
(c) Preparation of preliminary cost estimates of proposed
construction and participation in conferences with fiscal
advisors and others having an interest or responsibility with
regard to the proposed project.
Phase 2 - Preparation of detailed plans and specifications - shall include:
(a) Surveys , preliminary design and layout o► the improvements;
(b) Furnishing the engineering data necessary for applications for
routine permits by local , state and federal authorities;
(c) Preparation of detailed plans, specifications and contract
documents for the improvements;
(d) Preparation of project quantities and cost estimates.
Phase 3 - General administration of construction - shall include:
(a) Assistance in the advertisement of the project for bids;
(b) Assistance in the opening, tabulation and analysis of the
bids received and recommendations as to the appropriate action
to be taken;
-2-
•
(c) Assistance in the preparation of formal contract documents
for construction contracts;
(d) Making periodic visits to the site (as distinguished from the
continuous services of a resident Project Representative) to
observe the executed work and to determine in general if the
work is proceeding in accordanace with the contract documents.
In carrying out this function, it is understood that the
Engineer does not guarantee the contractor's performance, nor
is he responsible for supervision of the contractor's operation
and employees;
(e) Consulting and advising with the Owner and preparing routine
change orders as required;
(f) Reviewing shop and working drawings furnished by contractors
for compliance with design concept and with information given
in contract documents (Contractor is responsible for dimensions
to be confirmed and correlated at job site) ;
(g) Preparation of monthly and final estimates for payments to
contractors, and furnishing any necessary certifications as
to payments to contractors and suppliers;
(h) Performing, in company with the representative of the Owner,
a final inspection of the project;
(i ) Revision of construction drawings, with the assistance of
the resident Project Representative, to reflect any revisions
included in construction records.
-3-
III.
For the basic services performed under Section II of this agree-
ment, the compensation to the Engineer shall be eight (8%) percent of
the cost of construction for which preparation of .plans and specifica-
tions are authorized at one time.
Cost of construction, as used herein, shall not include the cost
of legal or engineering services, the cost of land, rights-of-way or
administrative expense; but does include the direct cost of all
construction contracts, including labor, materials and equipment required
for the completed work and the total value at site of project, of all
labor, materials and equipment purchased or furnished directly by the
contracting agency for the project.
Upon completion of detailed plans and specifications, and/or the
required review by the Owner, eighty percent (80%) of the total basic
charge shall be due and payable. The remaining twenty percent (20%)
shall be paid after the construction work is completed and accepted by
the Owner.
For special services such as court litigation and other miscellaneous
services not outlined in Section II , the Engineer shall be compensated
on the basis of actual salary cost times a multiplier of 2.25; direct
expenses and subcontract costs incurred shall be reimbursed at actual
cost times a multiplier of 1 .10. Statements for services in this cate-
gory shall be rendered monthly and payment shall be due not less than
thirty (30) days after submission of a statement.
-4-
IV.
The charge provided herein shall not include property, boundary,
and right-of-way surveys; shop, mill , field or laboratory inspection of
materials; cost of test borings and other subsurface explorations ; copies
of "As Built" plans and specifications in excess of five (5) ; calculations
of special assessments ; the services of a resident Project Representative
for continuous on-the-site observance of the work; or the furnishing
of construction line and grade surveys .
V.
It is understood and agreed that the Owner shall have complete
control of the services to be rendered and that no work shall be done
under this contract until the Engineer is instructed in writing to
proceed with the work. At the time written instructions are given to
the Engineer to proceed, evidence shall be furnished that funds are
available to pay for the services required.
It is also understood that the Engineer will not supply a resident
Project Representative for continuous on-the-site observance of the
work or-7.f=a-s4—cons-truction 44-ne-and grade-'-surveys unless instructed
in writing to do so.
VI .
Any provision in this contract notwithstanding, it is specifically
understood and agreed that the Engineer shall not authorize or undertake
any work pursuant to this contract, which work would require the payment
of any charge, expense or reimbursement in addition to the charge stipu-
lated in Section III , without having first had and obtained specific
-5-
written authority therefor.
VII .
This contract shall not be assignable in whole or in part without
the consent of the Owner.
VIII .
In connection with all the work outlined or contemplated above, it
is agreed that the Owner or the Engineer may cancel or terminate this
contract upon thirty (30) days ' written notice to the other, with the
provision and understanding that immediately upon receipt of notice of
such cancellation from either party to the other all work and labor
being performed under this contract shall immediately cease, pending
final cancellation at the end of such thirty-day period, and further
provided that the Engineer shall be compensated in accordance with the
terms of this agreement for all work accomplished by him prior to the
receipt of notice of such termination.
-6-
•
IN WITNESS HEREOF, The City of Wichita Falls has caused these
presents to be executed by its authorized representatives, and witness the
execution hereof by Biggs & Mathews, Inc. , Consulting Engineers , through
J. E. Biggs, Jr., P.E. , President.
THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS
1 \
ATTEST: By 1 ` `� �
Gerald G. Fox U
Cit"Manager
City Ste' .,4
BIGGS & MATHEWS, INC.
Consulting Engineers
APPROVED AS TO FORM: , 0-
By .e1ti�� 1�
Biggs P.E.
—7—