Res 137-2021 Professional Service Agreement Garver for Jasper Water Treatment High Service Pump Station 11/02/2021 Resolution No. 137-2021
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional
Services Agreement with Garver, LLC for the evaluation of the Jasper
Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station in the amount of
$109,600.00
WHEREAS, one of the City of Wichita Falls' Strategic Goals is to Provide Adequate
Infrastructure; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to have a reliable pumping system to
distribute drinking water; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to reduce the amount of energy required for pumping
drinking water to its citizens and industry.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement with Garver, LLC to
evaluate the Jasper Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station in the amount of
$109,600.00.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
i$4
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ryi'�Lf� 11.11
City Clerk c%
Professional Services Agreement between the City of Wichita Falls and G n-er,LLC
for Consulting Senices for the
Jasper Water Irearment Plant High Service Pump Station Evaluation
OW ER: The City of Wichita Falls.:Attn:Director of Public Works_P.O.Box 1431.Wichita Falls_Texas 7b307
CONSt LTANT: (rarer_LLC
PROJECT: Jasper Water Treatment Plant(WTP)High Service Pump Station(HSPS)Evaluation
TIMETABLE: Time is of material consideration for services performed under this Agreement.CONSULTANT shall
complete the scope of work in accordance with the schedule outlined in Attachment 1—Scope of Services.
PAYMENT:
1.Payment for Basic Services.OWNER agrees to pay the following amounts for Basic Services rendered pursuant to
this contact. a total amount of S109,600.00 subject to completion of the following phases of the PROTECT:
Iask Amount
Project Management,Data Review and Compilation 56.600.00
Jasper HSPS Evaluation S103,0-00.00
Total S109,600.00
CONSULTANT shall invoice Owner on a monthly basis. Such invoice shall include supporting documentatianreasonably
necessary for Owner to know with reasonable certainty the proportion of Services accomplished
I.Pa}anent for Additional Services. OWNER shall pay CONSULTANT for Additional Services requested and rendered
as follows:
2.1.Payment for Additional Services of CONSULTANT rendered under this Contract(-Contract-or-Agreement.)shall
be paid as mutually agreed to scope and fee. Additional services shall be authorized by an executed amendment to this
a rreement.
3.Times of Payments.
3.1.Tunes of Payments--CONSULTANT shall submit monthly statement for Basic and Additional Services rendered.For
Basic Services.the statements will be based upon CO ISULT NTS estimate of the proportion of the total services actually
completed at the time of billing. OWNER shall make prompt monthly payment in response to CONSULTANTS monthly
statements. Upon conclusion of each phase of Basic Seri€es_OWNER shall pay such additional amount.if any_as maybe
necessary to bring total compensation paid on account of such phase to the following percentages of total compensation
payable for all phases of Basic Services.
3.2. Past-Due Payments--OWNER agrees to pay a charge of 0.5°u per month. or the allowed interest according to
applicable law(whichever is higher)on a]2 invoiced owed amounts not paid within 30 days of the date of the Invoice,
calculated from the date of the invoice_ In addition_CONSULTANT may_after fining 10 days'written notice to OWNER,
suspend services under this Agreement until the CONSULTANT has been paid in full all amount due for services and
expenses.
OWNER'S REPRESEtiTAUVE: Russell Schreiber_Director of Public Works_City of Wichita Falls
BASIC SERVICES: CONSULIANT shall comp:e-=_the professional services as Basic Services as outlined in Appendix
A—Scope of Services according to the industry:-ass trd of care:CONSULTANT shall perform any and all services
required herein in accordance with generally accepted practices and standards employed by the applicable United States
professional services industries as of the effectrs-e date of this Agreement_practicing under similar conditions and locale_
Such generally accepted practices and standards are not intended to be limited to the optimum practices.methods,
techniques.or standards to the exclusion of all others.but rather to a spectrum of reasonable and prudent practices
employed by the United States professional services industry:
Page 1
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
I.Te rrn ination--OW N F:R may team inate 1111., .gieenie:c.'won le:.• I:11.1 lo CONSULTANT with the
undemaraliiir ail services being performed under thisVL:d1OZI in,such notice.
LI pon term rut C()NSI..11..TAN I-S.alleged default,II".trN.,". 1 I AN! lid v...ten ILl nportunity to cure.[n
the cycn 1.i ly nit Mat ion,CONS I.TA N1 shall in% \I:R Mid bL 1:011111.2!ISLILII Fr II) ill servicc:s properly
this Agreeinein.Lind ronsonablecosys IT;CC)NI-I.(II. oii or bviiiri:CONSL.I.TANTS receipt
of ili .1.irmiodoon notice. iiiItidiric oil outstanding and unpaid invoices. Upon wrininaliun for converilenee,
CON:SE It'1"A\ I ha I I allow bc proi.ided ii)all costs reasonably incurred to bring such services tic an orderly cessation.
2. Or;nersh in .%", Iintc'riciicrr ni Document,. All documents and clii„H,11 assembled by
CONSE.I.I du, I *.11,1 IJ I:: I Or (:05\ h.. .1.•Ikered to OVITNER
without resit ic:i•in IN.-.pro% Ai,6:ill ••in>. unless provided
niVi.INI-Ri....11.1111...iniin ilirpropero, I • 11 I I may cominiki:.1 n
rNI.2•111CPI 1.1 A .111 • :i•1 \1 1,!...iiirrevi.pcdhle,rion-....%. IR.....
license 1.01'(1-:1-' I „',i,•II:MplMcd • "•.2“1.. I'0 the 4'..{.Lecd.allmwrd . 1'54,
OWNE R hciII ktrd. ".L1111111) .Rdd harmless ( I iRI LS Subconsul[artts against iosscs.
al i.
,..;.innov.,;.injuries.. 1 • 01.reasonable ill 11.2.2. 7.'2.. 5 • c of change to,or ru e- se ordcli .or
calrlr project.0 V NEIC reuse of documents oil ii1111112 iL i C.sole risk or011,VN ER.L. SE.1 I A
,;;;0••• mike ipies o1 0 . 110 1 1!11....uments for its files awl re-11,.. contained therein. CONSULTAN I will
!r0I0cL 1---1;!rot, cars the OWN].it ha:,ui .1. 1111,..11 priyment to the contractor and all other pending
mite:•die and pro.,LI, •, OWN
an co v,LAU-- II'!.; ere h:performable and is CO be governed by the law applicable in Wichita Falls.Texas.
Sole venue for any action urisipe LI11. 1'this Agreement shall be in Wichita County,Texas.
4.Assignment of Contract—CON SULTANT haItnni assign,siihi-t or transfer any rights under or interest in(including,
but without limitations,monies that may become due or 111,rniesih.il. his Agreement without the wh-inen consent of
the other. Unless specifically stated to the i :Ho tt rumn coo 1..]an assignment,no assign men t will release Or
discharge the assignor from any duty or thesponsibilii!, Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
prevent CONSULTANT from employing indepenclern .....J.r,:s.stibeontractors,and employees to assist it in
the performance of serwlee5 hereunder,
5.!lo Third-Party Beneficiaries—Nothing herein shall bc to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than
OWNER and CONSULTANT.
O. Independent Contractor—In :11.9.7"iiriii service% under this Agreement. the relationship between OWNER and
CONSI,.I.TANT is that oil . ,• .1 , •'."••`• ;And CONR;i.I "1 AN I A.greancnit
do noi change lIce independent corin ; .•••• I I ANT. No term or pro,,hion of this A gni i or airt of
r in the pertbrimutce 1111:,..V1 •. . . roirucil:IS ma k ing CONSULTANT or any .i.gent,servant
or employee of CONS LI IJANT tho.1,4ent,sei.... I. ...II,[Id% N ER,
7. Indent ry,,c, N$1LuatiLagrst912r,vlease,inclernniA.,and hold the O'W11 wh _and harmless against any and
all third nuts:kid elaim .suits.add actions foram,ciairns of bodily injury or tangible property damaae resulting.from the
negi igent nerforrn twee or negligent attempted per romance of this Contract.This indemnity shall.11.41aDINV loamy claim to
/Le extent to which CONSULTANT l5 prohibited from i ncle inniPy Mg a governmental entity pursuant Initi,..Local Gov't
Code 271.904 or Ocher law,
8,Governmental Function Clause—All panics agree that this Contract is one wherein 0 WNF R is solely perform ing a
governmental function.All parties expressly agree that OWNER is not engaging in any proprietary funetions,
9.Contractual Damages Limitation Clause—
9.1 All parties agree that exposures for damages in this Contract are limited by agreement of the parties,and to
those damages authorized under Texas Local Cover:uncut Code Section 271,t 53.
Page 2
9.2 NO 1 1w 1 I Hti i ANI)ING. NE'11'NI_I{ I'.!, , I slIALL. 13I. I.LAtHl t IO I lit: 0111FR PARTY FOR
C()N`F:Q[ll'N I'IAI I)AA41A(iFRSOR E\t '•.iPI.ARY DAMAGES OF ANY MINI)RI•.(iARM I;Stipl-
THE CAL:tii OR ACTION tl\I I I11r1'•::, \I GLICLNCE. OF ANY KIND OR ( HARA(•I1•.R
INCI.I!i)[NCi VA55 NEGL IGENCE:1,
9.3 NOTWI'IHSTANI)!\c I.' I'sIUh 1O TIlE ('ON IRARY HEREIN. CONStil TANT'S
(INCI.I Il)IN(i 11 5 SIR ''`' ,I I ; 1`-i-`_ At ii 'NTS. ASSIC NLI.S_ Al I'11.IA i'I"'S ANI) VENDORS)
TOTAI-A[i(iRl[iAII I I'tIll F. Ii'."I i{ iHEAGRELM1MLNI SHALL1-11-. IM111I EDT O I(Nt9,,(W
TLIE AciRI'-I':h1LN l I'•li i; ti5 OF THE CAUSE OR AC I'll N IINC'[.LIUIN{..i
NEGLIGENCE Of AN'I ltir\ 'tik e it \k Al."1ER INC L.L'UINCi(.iROSS\1.til.,lcit:NC
9,4 CONSUL"TANT shall be entitled to an cduitahlc adjustment in the Agreement pr ice and poi ecl schedule for
impacts to the sec.,ices resulting horn events br)ond CONSUL.['ANT'S control.
ln,41 ail er nP Ann' Fees Iran) action a1 las+or in equity es rrecescar)to cnt'orce this agreement,each party agrees
u s' ies ,.n i...ill not seek to recover IN own atturrieys'tiro from the other party. CONSULTANT
1.: ".i LL.i. I tic,il I •,..,nuncio(',de uncehapter 1. 4 27I.153taif ti provides that the total amount or money
• I. I ii r.ii r;Ijiid.CffiiUn entity fur breach of a contract incluck"s attorneys' tees. Both
CI I 1 1tJ I and()WNI k .' F ess1•, .s,i.sc all stawtoly and other rights to recliser attorneys' fees pursuant to in
271 I ,i rL."t and all lather lay.
I I.Exhibits
The roll:, i n I suit I. -,rc attached to and made a pan of this Agreement:
ment:
Appendix A—5<<•l Set-ci s
OWNER and CONSIiI.TANT,by signing thisAgreen'c r.acknowledges that they have inderxmdeni ly ns‘airedlhenisebees
and confirms that they Ind.'sidualls have csamI ic,I I...'. 1 xhibit... :rid agrees that all of Lire aforesaid I shihns shall he
considered a part o1'this Agreement end agrees H.he a;,und•,0 thc tei Ir . *r os isiuns.and other requirements thereof.unless
specifically excluded.
Acceptance ot thic proposed A recrnent is indicated by an authorized.i.'c,cr,111'i, !iIA Nl.K signing in the" ace provided
below.
12.Verification
I,(authorized oflicial))A,riie./ if • nay do Hereby depute and verily the trtithlulness and accuracy of the
contents of the statements submitted On Ih s coitication under the ptuvi►ions o1'Stthtitic I. I itic Ili,(fowl-went(itdc
Chapter 2270 and that the company named below:
I I)' rr L.co,cotr. I.ra?I current's.:and
.,•ir I ,;('I during the teen of the contract;and
Is r. t __1 .: .14 I..:,,: on the Stale. of Texas Comptroller's Companies that Bo)coil Israel List located at
helps: ,cc>rttpttullc(.les,i,_; I ur leasing nulilicalions.divestment.php
04YYek L LC
Company Name
. ignaturc of Authorized Official
Palm 3
Title of Authorized[ frcial Date
'Ibis Aan cment and said atlachmems may only he amended,supplemented,mindiI;cd or canceled by a duly executed written
inytrumenl.
EXECUTED,this the day of ,20 .
OWNER: City of Witt tiLi Falb,Texaz CONSULTANT: Garver,LLC
Daum Leikcr,City Manager — i n Virr President
(sweat) (sea])
ATTEST: ATT .S'F:
Mark: linlllhrop,Cily Clerk
ECRU APPROVI7.1):
ICinlev I leggluntl,City Anornry
Pup 4
APPENDIX A-SCOPE OF SERVICES
�. General
General y, the scope of services ncludes an assessrrierit c:i !re Jasper High Service Pump Station
it I. PS) to ceterrnine recommenced improvements inclscirq an 'as-is" wire-to-water efficiency and
:energy n_ensity eralua°ion A rip r, Jl optimization audit for t;7c. tested pump station is included in the
v_dr. and in rieot! !;ar. Or the Ci irver team to determine non-invasive energy efficiency measures
:rEktk1ti1 Ttie e t E';11 'le I help r_d,..ice the overall energy intensity (kWIMGD) and increase reliability
xrl i"e .na!ntairing
2, Project Management, Data Review and Compilation
Garver will provide overall project !rla.,.acJ:3•rent services for the project in:�ludin1J the following:
2.1 Develop and maintain a prolect sohodule, along with r'i(:n°'ily ,rt}dates Garver will advise the
CITY of critical path items al°ec rig the project progress vi-..rsi.s the pi ^ned schedule. If needed,
rernertialion items shall be: nr!rrific :,. developed, and im lemertc. :c k^rip the project on a
mutually agreeable schedule. Go-ver will maintain and rr:}n for project erq neering budgets and
submit monthly invoices and progress -epo-`s based or oinc•ess Of work .cy date. Garver will
also maintain total project budgets that may Li'clude Other parties involved in the project:
2.2 Conduct virtual project lick-off meaning. Following data acquisition and h stancal data review.
Garver will conduct a kickoff meeting with the CITY The purpose of the kickoff meeting will he to
review the objectives of the project. review the scope of work, discuss the schedule, high ig.it the
deiiveroales provide a summary of the historical data received to date. and update w.th any
fiarthe`data .eyuests;
2.3 Conduct up to six month y progress meetings {virtual), if needed, with the CITY's staff via
tcleconie,,'er'ce,vlden conference;
2.4 Provide an ageirda in advance of all scheduled meetings and provide subsequent meeting
minutes following the meeting;
2.5 Garver v:il prepare a Project Management Plan and Qua°ty Control Plan to identify responsible
parties and aid in coordination between entities;
2.5 Provide quality control of del .crables;
2.7 GARv'r .x ill p; c::rqe the C?.A,+era list of any required) r, f; nn..r5.sary to perform the assessment
and kh= 0^A-Ici. •a,II ,rr,rig: 7.1e necessary data. Gr'°•.MILR ,;I review the information available
fror•r prey 0,15 protects annJ/sr record dc1::i.rr!unls If a 41 k!4r i. l ii.,ormation is needed to complete
the pu rr;~ !Ir,tic. ssessrr aril, C,/.ldVF R .ai I requ(:s1 from Owner, and Owner
,tital p^c:Idc. :hi; n'c'rlrolir:r) I'r Ire i eq,ie .te 'rvni a:,
3. Jaspr.r l I SPS I valuation
:',system Model
Garver;Nil .ipdale the exist'r q waiter distribution system model to add the Kell West Elevated Storage
Tank (ES]) An other model .ipd^+.rs will be considered extra work. Garver will utilize the updated
d''istributior i 5lsin n ;,dr:l :: ::i:' r air;, system curve envelope for the Jasper HSPS lased on model
scenarios sod is c additional scenario representing Conditions during the existing pump testing. The
updated ri r.1v , t also be used to develop HSPS system curve to identify operating conditions for
new, more t'_pfic".c, it bumps.
Deliverables updd !: d d stribution system model,
Appendix A-Scope of Services 1 of 12 2OW062412
Wichita Falls Jasper HSpS Evaluation
3.2. Field Investi Cation
Garver will conduct Up to one (1)day of field investigation to evaluate the existing Jasper I-ISPS and
Motor Control Center(MCC).
This assessment will include multi-discipline engineers (Process/Mechanical, and Electrical and
Instrumentation completing a visual assessment for COnditien-based items along with verbal and/or
written historical performance perspective from the CITY for each item.
Deliverable: Draft Field Investigation Technical Memorandum.
3,3, Field Testing and EEM D velop t
Garver will perform wire-to-water efficiency testing on the Jasper HPS as detailed below:
• Jasper High Service Pump Station
a. Duty Operation-Pumps chlorinated,treated water from the clearwell to the
distribution system that is floated by en elevated tanK system
b. Number of Pumps—4
c. Variable Frequency Drive(VFD)—Pump No. 3 is on a VFIJ;ethers are constant
speed
d_ Operaticnal Notes!Testing consIderabons: Pump No. 3 is VPD driven but can
only turn cowry to approximately 13,%. Pump No. 4 is out of service;evaluation of
Pump No.4 wil'i be based on Pump No 3 performance.
Re5Ufts of testi g will rovirigil prc;r ll p,lri irig efficiency, otheraisc known as wire-to-wafer efficiency:
and energy in';*n,ar F. It reb; vct to ere qy consumption aid demand. tcVv'h`rv'G. and kW(MGD
respectively Adaiti rrally, a fi l,a .ierr"eel °:vst+m curve will be r1 i.}lope:i cr one and multiple pump
cporation 11.19 fielc'-verified system r.r: is esseritial n „r 17O system curve
:7velope fr;.m :+7c bvdraulic model, which is used to verify proper operation of existing
p,riv .irdrvr replacement pumps. It also helps reveal potential Er`,/1ra The annual energy savings
from 77e rrr:l:, iu i Ief./1 .vr and kW), along with the peak SUMener water demand months, will be
osEirnalr rl uy uwq t e results of the fink: tt±stii;tt r-nr..ipled with the historical billing data, pump annual
runtime. and the e"e-qy r:c.i-.on niticik,alr:d:cntl: the suggested EEMs
GUrver's t.'er:row! utI e,. to acquire tl-e ;:I c trical data fui wre-too--water efficiency tests,
speci'cally I ne-to-line anipr.'a,;e a: J phase power Factor utilizing an appr:v!.r1 p; we,
quality rm;ritor. Dunrg the wi•e-tr,-:pater .ests. i a•ve, will collect the hydraulic data, Consis.'nq of
SuCb n water a cl ;; pressure, and flow rate,while thr.,dectriCian collects the elec:r cal vat=,
Both electric:HI and hydraul will be collec•A:i simu'tar1eor..ry and entered in Garver s
E-fficjencv Tt.,ol l:r Fovea' th wre ta•ve2rer ffirii i:yy, and energy intensity in kWIMGD end ['�....11 ra1i
1 he purpu.:v a' -ne tc 1 Cti capture 'as-.s" purnpirq info ration indicative of r1Orrral
operation,wirilr a'.^:rr r a;.;tur,i:g the historical.nigh aid love spy,^^1^-c r the pump so a field.veritie rste.n
curve can be Oe.vd(..:ped. Collecting bookend operating points also arlaws fir more accurst.
(Awn; :7-4:':1141ori 1'I- to.rical operating speed and/or flow is available.
While perform rg r i :vi:e.-.o-war tests, Garver will asSesswhioh Of the followiry Ebt.,1 s may or
not be pertinerr. . Nos .nay irul,iMe the following no-Cost, low-Cost. and higher-cost suggest n,nr
Appendix A Scope cf Services 2 of 12 2.0W08240
' /ichita Falls Jasper I-ISPS Evaluation
• Addition of air release/vacuum valves for"air locked' pipes within the plant site
• Pipe looping, upsizing,or adding parallel pipe for hydraulically choked networks
• New, more effie:innl p.imp(s)
• Instrumentation upgrades
• VFIJ I Motor cni"ilgl.,•ation upgrades
• Modified control deyi.ri,nlialt:;
Existing flow, level,and pressure instrumentation will be evaluated during the soaping visit.This Scope
of Work includes rental fees for a transit time portable flow meter and excludes any rental fees for
instlrurnerltatior+ meters Such as pressure gauges or level sounders,
3.4. Energy Savings Calculations
Garver will calculate the overall pumping ef`lcier y (%) and energy intensity for each of the pumps
basal on the "as-is' testing. He testing may not reveal actual pump conditions during all operating
scenarios experienced, but efforts nil be to<nii to make sure the"as-is" testing scenario is indicative
of normal operating conditions To establish bookends on the geld testing, the lowest historical VFD
speed setting and highest historical VFD speed setting over the past two(2)years will also be tested-
The estimated annual energy sa•ir gs in kL^Jhlyr end lbsCO :y a—e r+:lcu d by comparing the existing
wire-to-water efficic72'r la 7 li y Il:r wire-le-water efficiency .t;l.l3 `hot can be ach eves `-om a pump
system that inoorpo-aii!--; i w EEM r rllt ng n a flatter system cue Ultimately. his resu is is lower HP
pumps to deliver the! ,•ni :}.;er;'oral flow with less total head(TH). Th•:r:di ference in IP ;r: iwefit
to kW) between the ex sting and procosed pump system is multiplied by !In-! tiG4lr;l ,-n rl.l l I;.warle
to obtain estimated k'V':'hryr savings. I I iyal i!.al runtime accuracy val dations are performed by
comparing historical annual k:ru ri :rilhly bills and fled kW obtained iron- .cureta-water
rests:adjustments to the annJa •,I-turie t, a r-nod._accordingly. After determining the.estimated kVlhtyr
savings several other metrics cal be ca latod as detailed in the IDeliverahla section below.
The 5-yr return on investment (ROI) cost is an important metric presented in the summary table. It
estimates the magnitude of capital investment required bran EEM implementation that will result in a
5-yr ROI given the kWhfyr, lbsCO2Iyr. and $Iyr savings estimated in the wire-to-water efficiency tests
This allows the City of Wichita rails to estimate the magnitude of a capital investment 'or an bEtvl to
recovc-cocas n operational sai•i.•.Ja owe"nle I.•is type of simple ROI investment analysts excludes
• Inflation or tune. :IIK! ,::x l c;f I-I(:i r
▪ Eloctricity co at v:'1-f I ly
a Vary nq p.ur-wr: runtir-it s
• Ad^irian a' .•.t.ihlyr ail.: hsC ?;r.yr savings for any EEMs that may result in reduced flow dr total
ayntinrr lead while rneetira c:•:stint c_pe-ational core:-a.n:s
EEt41s .w II be Ii ebel ,eui as c.u,leled recon r'lendlit ons in the detailed calculation sheet for each pump
tested,fix prl3:,ented in ATTACHMENT B Garver =^-rn'vas th r the pumps evaluated In these tests are
properly sized with respect to instantaneous f r,rx, .Any FFI•I. Carver suggests shall not compromise
th s parameter
AppendixA Scope of Services :: :if 'i 20WM240
V4+ichitaa Falls Jasper!ASPS Evaluation
Note All savings are considered approximat ranteed as there are many scenarios that
may influence the true energy savings,such of electricity and demand charge volatility,and
require a more detailed design to refine the EFNI
DELIVERABLES:
• Wire-to-water test input and output data Vane I I 1::. r Al,
• Field-yenned system curve st.werr-nposei performance curves with respect to flow
vs total he-,-1 eire-to-water efficiency, and true power(Included in Attachment A).
s 5 year ROI ti reframe associated with each pertinent •_EM, Ths takes the estimated blended
annual savings from each EEM multiplied nv 5 year i. 1,.'ke rine which EEMs rank
the highes ep!the estimated capital budget tha. I a 5 year ROI
• Surnmai Suggested EEMs(Example re:LJJI .I I 1 B)
• EEMs Workshop identifying suggested EEMs,ROI,and '.e.d investigation TM
3.5 Refine EEMq
The focus of this task will be to shorthst and refine pertinent EEMs developed d,ii i-j 1' Li testing
that result in more efficient pump operation while keeping in mind the EEMs must no: 111.n p'ornise the
operational intent of the pump station. Hydraulic focused EEMs be developed 'or the pumps
evaluated. Other EEMs may range from mechanical electrical and contra ,mpr,evernentS to evaluating
if the HSPS is on the most economically advantageous rate structure.
Garver will review the current energy procurement strategies and electric uttty billinq rites to identify
alter r'•dive strategies and billing rates that would reduce the overall energy T• .:. I include a
rev L..; o'the current utility billing rate i-i -.-etify opportunities to reduce ee ,iciagieg the
Warr 21-nand and the potential ber'etit t-om participating in utility party load curtailment ori
The piadt billing rate will be incorpon-,--I r benefit evaluation to accurately account for the remand
and energy charge offsets for each modida:it Dr'
Succescf: I rr ,f.c wIl be developed to a concept level, but with enough detail to provide conservative
concr,,i- t'st mates required for a simple ROI analysis Where applicable concept level
quut.i ccl 1 1--q °sled from vendors to provide andifor install said EEMs If vendors are not
resv_re,„ IT-I, 1, Garvt- I „fs,e best judgement in arriving at costs.
3.6 Gerler
Garver will review critical --iectrical Led hi C' cy plant operations at the Jasper
WTP, preliminary cackup qu, zind = planning-level opinion of probable
construc tie r sts for an emergency 11,-iL'kup generator Gar,t i eve lop two(2)alternative backup
ee.ne-,te my scenarios incAl-Ars
1. Fuli plant capac-fi, ID)
2 Cntical emergency operations (-10 MGD) including pumps, filters, backwash pumps, and
clarifier mixers.
Garver will also evaluate alternative equipi-i..• t I = r.:=..uce overall electrical load.
including soft starts or VFDs and provide - I develop conceptual site plans
Appendix A-Scope of Services 20W06240
Wichita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
and one-line diagrams The generator evaluation Drill be irr:Ai ed in the Jasper HSPS Evaluation
Report.
3.7. Summary.Report Technical Memorandum
The engineer will develop a technical memorandum (T11) documenting the project background, field
investigation, field testing methodology and calculations, field test results, EEN1 recommendations,
supporting theory and a simple ROI cost analysis for recommended EEMs. and HSPS evaluation
recommendations including Bridget-level opinion of probable construction cost. Potential EEMS may
include:
• Installation of air release valves on"air locked"pipes within the plant site
▪ Pipe looping, upsizing, or adding parallel pipe for hydraulically choked networks
• New pump impeller design and/or new. more efficient pumps)
• VFD/motor configuration upgrades
• Modified c:aritiol Jes[:ription
DELIVERABLES:
• Draft Jasper HSPS Evaluation Report
• Draft Jasper HSPS Evaluation Report Workshop_{virtual)
• Final Jasper I ISPS Evaluation Report
4. Project Deliverables
The following will be submitted to the Owner„or others as indicated, by Garver
A. 1 copy of the Draft Summary Report TM+electronic(PDF)
E. 1 copy of the Final Summary Report TM+electronic(PCIF).
S- Extra Work
The following items are not included under th s ar]r'P,iviK'r :::it,{rill be considered as extra work:
A. Redesign for the Owner's convenIer1 ,„ ,,.0 'r .:-1 imicc conditions after previous alternate
direction and/or approval.
E Preparation or party;;potion n addit`ogo meetings w1.1 C..rier or associated utilities, beyond
what is cescribed in the S r;F, irf:i• i..:e;,.
C. O r. wily ^.t hen male' beywnd "+_i' p-c^,.ided in the. ^rape, of Services, including technical
remorr:rd .. reports, or otherdocuiici-iii Work_
L',. Visiti7g rh. City nr'tilVii Nita Falls Jasper HSI'S to col ect data or informati0n not available or
c1I'C' wii-i[i pmnvI::H: by tl'e ()wrier.
supp errent_,I info-i_n_cr that r,ti r,l pry ded pursuant to the Scope of
See:ice Ti
�.,ta rill' li (: cle rtr tables it acdr.on to those listed
Des g of any L I ti..z: relnce iar r;i r:l^r'Irii:ri° •i'•;difictalian's.
-i Structural evaluator' of HSPSIr�ici,u r.rie.
I, Design drawings and speciticaticrs required for some Pi M modificatiois (as needed).
I Permitting of any EEMs with loco age ivies
K L.is r=bution system model t,eyond the addition of Kell West EST.
Appendix A-Scope of Services 5 of 12 2Owoc2 o
Wichita Falls Jasper HSI'S Evaluation
L Transient analysis of existing and/or recommended pumps.
M Construction materials testing
hi Required instrumentation provided by Garver in addition to those defined herein
O Sery ICJ—. iler construction such as warranty follow-up, operations support coordination, etc
P Act.1 II site visits,beyond what is described herein or is required to perform the work within
Q Kk.., ! ',ince indicator(KPI)evaluation and dashhe.-!,,ii i igration
Extra Work will be as directed by the Owner in writing for an dud tiJn fee as agreed upon by the Owner
and Garver.
6. Schedule
Garver shall begin work under this Agreement within ten (10)days of a Notice to Proceed and shall
complete the work in accordance with the schedule below
Phase Description Calendar Days
Data Requestilieview 14 days from start date(or Owner-provided data)
Field Investigation 30 days from receipt of data
Field Testing&EEM Development 30 days from receipt of(I,.
Energy Savings Calculations 21 days from Field Test ELM Development
EEMs&Field Investigation Workshop 14 days from Energy iir, .Jlations
Refine EEMs 14 days from Suggested r
Draft Jasper HSPS Summary Report 30 days from Refine EEMs
Draft Jasper HSPS Summary Report 14 days from Draft Jasper HSPS Summary Report
Workshop
Final Jasper HSPS Summary Report 14 days
1..,:;pendix A-St:, [,-: • •;• ,
ATTACHMENT A
- Sample Template for Wire-to-Water
Test Input Data Table
Appendix A-Scope of Services 7 of 12 20W015240
Wichita Fails Jasper HSPS[valuation
rri ) t w
b � 1 T
r
rvE p �y
N N x, ? s F] R w
d c d
R _......-,.....`.... Lys —� r
Is
r n E
888 9
Y w ; 9 `
O
u
a
15
'g _ t - ; Y1 : � e2g1 ; ; ol -� iiii ! p9
$
" •
ia11 § 4s svam1 ° : i "' iiii ; ono
� i — —0
pi pa r
y T �
W r i .. a
t 12 4
..E, iii 5i: 8
- wl j : ni i si 1 : . ,i!,
Nill : i
:7.1
An5 P K
�, � � ry W �O h
i ! tileili iiiiR ;7; ; 1 iii ,, n _, ODO
if.1, 1,
i!,
I
g : ,,''''.. -
� . fi ri
s
.x r .rt 1 1 '� : uY fi o 3
E C O. 1 • a 7 O. e3
p . .';•
gyp t i E z v l ; 4 6 3 u `n n
N ; g a 9 0 c i ' 1 ti 1 > > - ei 4. s
4 it
ti ; ,, „ gr
r d a
`
si
Appendix A-Scope of Services 8 of 12 20WC624O
Wrclhita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
ATTACHMENT B
- Sample Template for Wire-to-
Water Test Output Data and
Summary with EEM Suggestions
Appendix A-Scope of Services 9 of 12 20W06240
VOchita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
It kel-W ter EffkleneyTest for Ventral Tuibina Puma Sworn
GA N V€li
O.•.Iop.d by.irk O .PE H.i.c Th.pvpo.•al 4ptt geed&idiom speed.r2 w cakulWao wo,kcbe•la r.m 11 Drad.;wit,worm..
CI.m Levi' b.+dent on.bit*grant to the left e4 tr•e nbin aperaIA teeod and rotor dal.poN to e.'VI"d
',wimp..W FP T..n,Aer Pump 2 rho.armel uPa'.11e kritot 11 Rl d ind abler et r
wM•�^r •'S r^"..••alnlr'..d irrx•..:altr el B.N dal.
Add...: ..1 rakuiar Ions N3 Df Imd.".I..e..TEMA.hall diva.. I . ,-a(Se 641.4E•I WO
EY.e1rle Ya•uli.Pppe4er•Padw.el.'.art '.M«rl ant 001,0a.A point 60,f.cum*i.r....11ry It..c. .: i„ , i
Tnel
•dws.!liar I!e.dl
,*IL...v.II.,4„GC2 NO!M'r!1
_ __
�_K IA•A x. r.r 1r,;, ,.. '1".i-a tCRCTRr... . •r...- .. .:I `1
'4FOSIWr.d(MII.S. I.. _.--,�........Pi;.nn..nl c�• __—
Y.GS I•i^M1 m IeMYdIM AY'tmx Ilr..N * 2
P,rn,wart.owl w errata(Ml,MVA I. tt'Jellies ly! .• 4S,t pn,�• d Ad).A•amw,e Ihn,yr!•AI• /E-
Peewee p°Whim.Pee tool p1 1i .ertarvi F.:.F. 4.4.7 *Mc. r Wtp SW Cols Qi .) [S a =
IN Fia..tram Fh)Srltor iryml,Li aia] e a _. .I1,5.7 Ater CIVIL�F AA .E3''a
.6 Flow horn.Fainting r..I CIp.M 6342 A.F v r6.v1 .e *SA Wilt Cad 0 tlacektry a 1 #
DtehIya Pg.IC V p.•G..*.11nl,Moo X. 41..wrabr A.te,.Ph A t«awl...• 131.3 Deward Cast tlecorldip WPM a C6..,.. ?
C61wn11 1witth gib It >t amM..il.Artr:u,l.•A rrpl.I,.. ilia 1f4340111 Power ft rot flIWI'Nap'• IS.?
(Mono FM ID(.r.1.Owl 21 1 MN....Cr A•,eym Pl A pw•pl-lr. SIAS IYnI N.a•IPI1l11y•w+4rolrn•
UmSuWra Wd m&l Dieer(q;r.tit Fah. 3 M-A••p••Y►le••PI ml.... WIZ Blew Pot.Monne-riVal•Vie' z £
uw.m,Swdl.,.llunlnt Oa Ft n1,Kroll I X ►mee eater Owl?•der= go WAWA*WI=11swr.,.=
cdranr«.Mradk..,Ftl.Warr am. rower Facto Idatd•pi,,• Dal *mow lMAIjett_ES...
solo(Maid Ipeeii.All• 41 Paver Feder Idltea•pie• am bla!WOOS ISM•s.a.e. N�
',awl ink new It row of A pow halo . F• OAS Muilw0«tlWt•Mp• •-
NA••Not he tried YmpPM/M IYMh/M11)s '
Ndefl•w.oe.[A ,wlaw it Ini i Y*Amin a
•A.vital teat al apr...w..t.dy Ur.r.Fu.may
a.pwvn.•a S.bnpla.r POI with.r.d..md•nerdy coal.
Appendix A Scope Services 10 of 12 20W06240
Wichita Falls Jasp. I,. H ': Evaluation
Wfae•2•Weter Effkiency Test for Vertical Turbine Pump System
fl611Y1F1A EEMr.. y•_. ,.,.,. ,.. ,i 4 I. ,r , „r 4x:m 5 o taea sp•u tipk.I Ath ifb
147.lup•d by;Eric Oulu,PE v .,..... .r , ,._ ,,. ,.,.. ,� ,, n .. I`. i� -I .•N.Yrp awt7•womb to Orco*hi pump rrn
CWnt P•lss. h � - . o f � 1,-^amM s1ne.w•7 rfor P.o l.•.
leralrn WT!roved..Pr.rnp 2 ., b J. rfid•rn .. n, ,. , !.SI Rwa s[fvea han•nh r
Jlddren. ., .. 1 „,.II ..•rlan r...�-n.r.r_r rn.- I.-,.n rs,'I.M••.n nom'in;etoiI mil thw this e•Mluwxr,-.:
14e1e1€%.isle Pravid.r P•dr,r..ir Pc-••r ., or•r•••In r••rr,� •,. +rd mews from entailing wrier iissI .1.91911010
.®.!r,.dr.n.•.e.sptakM.Nola dine e•r•oinr
WTP Transfer Pump 112 Field Verified System Need CI.frye
1711 - 10094
n y�� 90%
:IDES -.a,-tlrS' tpeu
xere 'rum
fro
a 5tl!i
r'rrw
s .m _ _ .. '" r _ _._.• w..,.f"lxrw{S r 174"I017()1171112
20% ——f,IvIfieldSystem
211
10 taJrVC Ii1l
ci 9000 freu7 fru000 2Jtuu
WTG1 Transfer Pump$2 W 2-W Efficiency and kW Trends
12tl.0 - 1 ..i4 u*,. r A ,•• ,LJ{ I Ili"dl 41 • aso.. 10.3{)7F. •
G r6 y y ,7r 7o(Yt{, . IM/trat1
aD.q i. 4+CI GxK kW 1S LcW7,4
. 1„
40.0 ry_y it„47 rim' 7 7,7%if OP*r J ".:I
30 0% • W 2 W I I.
B' !7tlf.6f I-,I ALUM < W-7-WWF., s'I,.,�w.;
20.0 • 1[S,11Fk Pdy IkV
Or
tl.0 056, LA oear lkW/II 31
3500 4000 4600 SOD) SSA') 61)Q0 6517U 11300. 750) itle0 Poly ON 2 w rf r1
114w'Y IiWT11
Appendix A-Scope of Services 11 of 12 20W06240
Wichita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
EEM a Anemia Pun-ears wi er Peril 1n clear welI by aft and sf•truna see,mprgrew 1,v err,[il my
SUMMSUMMARY
fawn 110161,78%
Annual Peat,COMump(1on SeweirS.kWhfrr 386,480 Sarrnry arr ha3.d on F,nId i v.'c.irvr:',r on('F su•^ce,f cr.ova:;o ro
All Wawa?Pima vines,L'W 15S !Samna are based on fled kW curves stir eac n hrtsollc al P P .date pear
Aug Veddef Power Sat•er .•., ns Sownes are based on held kW cures rer I c..,tlete pu•�'
Annear Power Serines.$;'I 43.:Co FstamMr Inciudlq cc,irrrptian(kWM arnI demand charges
Ut1.1ty Rebel- C S4esanrw{aced durrne Summer mo rthi
ECM Cnct,S r r• 19S.000 Par irrrrrrce to install E!hE
43
loom a Of 1COW Ibl it!cuts Eldrn,PLY Ye. 403 f24/7/SlS dprratlEA
Carbon Footprint Red,ae.p]to, t0:.63: Per Un,ted Ste tra Coady Information 4awniapatlan 12 Ola CO211Wh)
Eauar..Miles Orman 21 mot mi. E67.748 Per iFlrned Yates EnNlly inlarn4atlonlda nWI Ir.Hafr
Fqw�•Gae Carrsumpt-On CO:e+.,n+41yr c:,32; P..tlnryd cgs Energy Inlorwnaon FbmniRNation 129.4*t4 CO21pi jos burned'
Appendix A-Scope of Services 12 of 12 20W06240
Wichita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation