AGD 11/02/2021 City of Wichita Falls
City Council Agenda
� ii 1Q,�,
Stephen Santellana, Mayor •
Bobby Whiteley, At Large
Michael Smith District 1
DeAndra Chenault, Mayor Pro Tern
Ak4ibt as Jeff Browning, District 3 MIst; , f
TEXAS Tim Brewer, District 4
Rim 5kieS Go-/den,0pportmlt'e5 Steve Jackson, District 5 44 g s '
Darron Leiker, City Manager
Kinley Hegglund, City Attorney
Marie Balthrop, City Clerk
Notice Of Regular Meeting Of The Mayor And City Council Of The City Of Wichita
Falls, Texas, To Be Held In The City Council Chambers, Memorial Auditorium, 1300
Seventh Street, Tuesday, November 2, 2021, Beginning At 8:30 A.M.
This meeting can be accessed and viewed at the following locations:
1. The video may be livestreamed on the City's YouTube page
(https://www.voutube.com/citvofwf)
2. A livestream will be shown on the Spectrum/Time Warner Cable Channel 1300
3. A livestream will be shown on the City's Facebook page (City of Wichita Falls,
Texas Government) (https://www.facebook.com/CitvofWF)
4. A video of the meeting will be posted on the City's YouTube page
(https://www.voutube.com/citvofwf)
Item #
1. Call to Order
2. (a) Invocation: Reverend David Sapata
DAV TX Chapter 41
(b) Pledge of Allegiance
3. Presentations
(a) Employee of the Month — Christal Ashcraft, Development Services
(b) Proclamation — Diabetes Awareness Month, Randall Barker
CONSENT AGENDA
4. Approval of minutes of the October 19, 2021 Regular Meeting of the Mayor and
City Council.
5. Resolutions
(a) Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of twelve (12) 2022
Ford Utility Police Interceptors from the low bidder Wichita Falls Ford-
Lincoln, Inc. in the amount of$419,568.48
(b) Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of eight (8) 3/4-ton
pickup trucks from the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc., in the
amount of$213,266.25
(c) Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of two (2) 1-ton trucks
from the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc., in the amount of
$59,947.86
(d) Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of two (2) 33,000 GVW
crew trucks from the low bidder, TNTX, LLC dba Lonestar Truck Group, in
the amount of$185,186.00
(e) Resolution authorizing award of bid to Retail Motorcycle Ventures, Inc. for
the purchase of three (3) BMW Police Motorcycles in the amount of
$84,923.31
(f) Resolution authorizing the purchase of one (1) John Deere 310L backhoe
with breaker through the Sourcewell Purchasing Cooperative from
Yellowhouse Machinery Co. in the amount of$133,220.00
6. Receive Minutes
(a) Landmark Commission, August 24, 2021
(b) Planning & Zoning Commission, September 8, 2021
REGULAR AGENDA
7. Executive Session
Executive Session in accordance with Texas Government Code §551.074 to
deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties,
discipline, dismissal of a public officer or employee (Council training and duties)
8. Public Hearing & Ordinance
Public hearing and take action on an ordinance annexing +/- 32.93 acres of land
out of Blocks 12 and 13, Denton County School Land, League 2, A-57, Wichita
County, Texas, located at 5030 Gregg Road, at the request of the property owner;
accepting the Trophy Park Subdivision, Section 5 Servicing Plan Agreement for
said tract under authority of Texas Local Government Code Chapter 43;
Subchapter C-3 — authority of municipalities to annex an area on the request of
owners; and designating the property zoning and Land Use Plan classification as
Single-Family 2 (SF-2) and Low Density Residential
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PAGE 2 OF 5
a. Public Hearing
b. Take Action
9. Ordinances
(a) Ordinance amending Section 6a of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee
schedule applied to Health Department operations; providing for
severability; providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and
providing an effective date
(b) Ordinance amending Section 5 of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee schedule
applied to Fire Department operations; providing for severability; providing
that such ordinance shall not be codified; and providing an effective date
(c) Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, to accept from the Office of the
Governor, Homeland Security Grant Division for the 2021 State Homeland
Security Program — Grant/Application #4216201, in the amount of
$29,250.00.
(d) Ordinance appropriating $29,118.00 of grant funds pursuant to the 2021
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program,
appropriating said funds to the Special Revenue Fund, and authorizing the
City Manager to execute all documents necessary to accept and share said
funds
(e) Ordinance amending Section 2 of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee schedule
applied to Community Development operations; providing for severability;
providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and providing an
effective date
10. Resolutions
(a) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the
Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall Roof Replacement Project to Lydick-Hooks Roofing
Co. Inc. in the amount of $1,369,300.00
(b) Resolution granting permission to the Major Francis Grice Chapter, NSDAR
to place a Vietnam War Memorial sculpture on City owned property
(c) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award a professional services
agreement with SAFEbuilt Texas, LLC to conduct building inspection
services for the new Wichita Falls Independent School District (WFISD)
Legacy and Memorial High Schools; associated athletic/band facilities and
accessory structures; and providing for a set rate for on-call building and
fire code inspections and permit plan review as needed
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PAGE 3 OF 5
(d) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute contracts with several
community service organizations and organizations that promote the
convention and tourism industry
(e) Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of one 5-yard dump
truck from the low bidder, Sam Pack's Five Star Ford, Ltd. in the amount of
$96,602.00; or to the local bidder TNTX, LLC dba Lonestar Truck Group in
the amount of$98,364.00
(f) Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with
Wichita County for reimbursement of water and sewer improvements
serving the Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation-Owned
Business Park in the amount of$1,045,845.00
(g) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a development
agreement with Patterson Properties, LTD. for the construction of a Storm
Drain By-Pass as part of their development
(h) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services
Agreement with Garver, LLC for the evaluation of the Jasper Water
Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station in the amount of$109,600.00
11. Other Council Matters
(a) Staff Reports — Submittal Checklist for Downtown Remodeling Projects,
Terry Floyd/Paul Menzies
(b) Announcements concerning items of community interest from members of
the City Council. No action will be taken or discussed.
12. Comments from the public to members of the city council concerning items that
are not on the city council agenda. People wishing to address the council should
sign up prior to the start of the meeting. A three-minute time frame will be adhered
to for those addressing their concerns. Since comments from citizens are not
posted agenda items, the City Council is prohibited from deliberating or taking any
action, other than a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. Staff may
provide factual statements in response to inquiries or recite existing policy.
13. Adjourn
Spanish language interpreters, deaf interpreters, Braille copies or any other special needs
will be provided to any person requesting a special service with at least 24 hours' notice.
Please call the City Clerk's Office at 761-7409.
Every item on this agenda shall be considered a public hearing. Regardless of the agenda heading under
which any item is listed, any word or phrase of any item listed on this agenda shall be considered a subject
for consideration for purposes of the Texas Open Meetings Act and other relevant law, and City Council
may deliberate and vote upon any such subject and resolutions related thereto. Resolutions, ordinances,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PAGE 4 OF 5
and other actions concerning any word, phrase, or other subject may be voted upon, regardless of any
language of limitation found in this agenda or any document referring to such action. Any penal ordinance,
development regulation or charter provision of the City of Wichita Falls or item which is funded by the current
or next proposed City of Wichita Falls budget, including, without limitation, any street, water pipe, sewer,
drainage structure, department, employee, contract or real property interest of the City of Wichita Falls,
may be discussed and deliberated, and the subject is hereby defined as such without further notice. Any
item on this agenda may be discussed in executive session if authorized by Texas law regardless of whether
any item is listed under "Executive Sessions" of this agenda, regardless of any past or current practice of
the City Council. Executive sessions described generally hereunder may include consideration of any item
otherwise listed on the agenda plus any subject specified in the executive session notice. Executive
sessions described generally hereunder are closed meetings, may include consideration of any item
otherwise listed on the agenda plus any subject specified in the executive session notice, and may include
items under Texas Government Code Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.073, 551.074, 551.076, 551.084,
and/or 551.087.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at Memorial
Auditorium, Wichita Falls, Texas on the 27th day of October, 2021 at 4:00 o'clock p.m.
lya„,,,,-- z I,
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PAGE 5 OF 5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Employee of the month.
INITIATING DEPT: Development Services
COMMENTARY: Presentation of the Employee of the Month Award (plaque, letter of
appreciation, dinner for two and check for $100) to Christal Ashcraft.
® Director of Human Resources
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION:
® Budget Office Review:
® City Attorney Review:
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.A
EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
FOR
November 2021
NAME: Christal Ashcraft
DEPARTMENT: Development Services Department
HIRED: March 9, 2015
PRESENT POSITION: Development Services Department - Administrative Assistant
NARRATIVE: Christal joined the Development Services Department as the
Department's Administrative Assistant in July 2018. Prior to joining the Development
Services Department, Christal served for three years as the Administrative Clerk in the
Finance Department. She plays a key role in the department by not only handling a
number of day-to-day administrative tasks across all of the five (5) divisions, but also
handles agendas, minutes, and other associated tasks for the City's Planning and Zoning
Commission, Zoning Board of Adjustments, Airport Board of Adjustments, and
Construction Board of Appeals. She works closely with both the development community
and residents in answering many questions related to all aspects of the department,
including general zoning inquiries, and often serves as the "front door"for the department.
She also handles all open records requests for both the Building Inspections and Planning
Divisions.
In addition to these key day-to-day tasks, Christal plays an integral role in the
department's efforts to fully digitize records, keeping the department's webpage updated,
aesthetic improvements, and overall efficiency throughout administrative tasks. Over the
past two years, she has led the department in many key areas of helping to make records
digitally available inter-departmentally, and will play a key role in the department's efforts
to enhance transparency and customer service in the area of digital records and
information.
FAMILY: Christal has three children: Kayla - 26, Austin - 19 & Cody— 15
HOBBIES: Christal enjoys being outdoors, swimming or working in her vegetable
garden. She also enjoys spending time with her kids and friends. She is also a movie
buff, particularly documentaries. She also enjoys crafting, sewing and cooking, but most
of all, she loves helping people.
CLOSING: The Development Services Department is very appreciative of the hard work,
"can do" spirit, servant attitude and overall positive attitude that comes from Christal. She
is truly a key member of the department and is a great asset to the organization and
residents of Wichita Falls.
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.A
City of Wichita Falls
City Council Meeting
.� Minutes '
kh.
October 19, 2021 � e �$ „
e 4ik,
TEXAS 6'4 f
$/u z5kieS 44e/den Q/portufu7iPs
Item 1 - Call to Order
The City Council of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas met in regular session on the above
date in the Council Chambers of the Memorial Auditorium Building at 8:30 o'clock a.m.,
with the following members present.
Stephen L. Santellana - Mayor
DeAndra Chenault - Mayor Pro Tem
Tim Brewer - Councilors
Jeff Browning -
Steve Jackson -
Michael Smith -
Darron Leiker - City Manager
Kinley Hegglund - City Attorney
Marie Balthrop - City Clerk
Absent: Councilor Bobby Whiteley
Mayor Santellana called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m.
Item 2a — Invocation
Gene Holley, Pastor, Life Church, gave the invocation.
Item 2b — Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Santellana led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Page 1 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Item 3a — Proclamation — Wichita Falls Fire Department 130th Anniversary Day—
Wichita Falls Fire Rescue
8:32 a.m.
Mayor Santellana read a proclamation proclaiming October 21, 2021, as Wichita Falls
Fire Department 130th Anniversary Day, and he called upon the residents of Wichita Falls
to express their appreciation for the exemplary services provided by the dedicated
members of our Fire Department.
Item 3b — Circle Trail Presentation and Discussion
8:35 a.m.
Pat Hoffman, Property Management/Lake Lot Administrator, presented an overview of
the history and timeline of the Lake Wichita boundary survey process that began in
2007. Ms. Hoffman discussed notifications mailed to property owners, town hall
meetings, encroachments on city property, notifications of encroachments, the
encroachment policy that was adopted, staff/citizens meetings to discuss
encroachments, and cleanup performed at the city's expense on the North side of the
lake. Ms. Hoffman discussed in detail the history of ownership, encroachments, and the
lease agreement executed for city owned property for the property where Larry's Marine
is located. Per Councilor Jackson's request, Ms. Hoffman read a portion of the lease
agreement, which clearly stated the intent of the City to construct a trail for public
pedestrian travel along the shore of Lake Wichita.
Blane Boswell, City Engineer, gave a presentation over the history of construction of the
Circle Trail, which began in 1987. Currently, 22.7 miles of trail has been completed, 0.6
miles is under construction, and there are two proposed areas equaling 1.1 miles that
have not yet been funded. Grant applications have been submitted for the two
incomplete areas. To date, $18.7 million has been spent to construct the trail with $14
million funded by grants and donations, and $4.6 million from 4B Sales Tax Corporation
funds. Mr. Boswell discussed regulations and ADA requirements for shared use paths,
and stated that transportation grants cannot be used to improve or widen streets, or to
acquire right-of-way, which means constructing the trail along the shoreline is the best
path to meet TxDOT grant requirements. He discussed issues with moving the trail to
the street, the average distance from homes on the proposed route versus on the street,
and the large cost difference between the two options. Mr. Boswell noted that the cost
to construct the path along the shoreline would be approximately $3.2 million, and
moving the trail to the street would cost approximately $5.3 million with additional
funding requirements for right-of-way acquisition. Moving the trail to the street would
require street improvements, drainage issues, driveway reconstructions, elevation
issues, utility relocations, and would not meet the requirements for TxDOT grant
funding. All taxpayers own the land along the shoreline, and constructing the trail along
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 2 OF 15
Page 2 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
the shoreline is more aesthetic, safer, requires no utility relocation or right-of-way
acquisition, and is the highest and best use of taxpayer dollars.
Mayor Santellana discussed right-of-way and drainage issues, and the increased cost to
move the trail.
Councilor Browning asked about the chances of receiving a grant if the trail is moved.
Mr. Boswell noted that for the current grant cycle, there is approximately $15 million
allocated for the entire state, and seventy-eight projects totaling approximately $123
million were submitted, so it is very competitive. It was noted that safety is one of the
items considered in the grant application and the purpose of the grant is to provide
alternative transportation routes.
Councilor Jackson asked for the date when TxDOT would approve grants and
expressed concerns about accepting the grant prior to the next council meeting. Mr.
Leiker stated that grant acceptance will be voted on by the council and discussed
various actions that would have to be voted on prior to the trail construction.
Councilor Jackson asked how many residents on Lake Shore Drive have paid a curb
and gutter tax without having curbs and gutters installed. Gary Morath discussed the
curb and gutter tax and stated that every citizen pays this fee when property is
purchased and a home is built. Council and staff tried to clarify if he was referring to a
development cost assessed by the builder, or a specific fee, but it was unclear
specifically what fee or tax Mr. Morath was referring to.
Mr. Morath spoke against the trail and discussed concerns with water covering the
proposed trail area, and how his property line was at the water's edge prior to the lake
level being lowered. Russell Schreiber, Director of Public Works, discussed the
lowering of the spillway as recommended by the Corp of Engineers due to safety issues
that created the path around the lake.
Judy Whittington, spoke against the trail, and expressed concerns regarding how
building the trail will affect private properties in the neighborhood, and the required right-
of-way referred to in the grant application. Mr. Schreiber addressed the right-of-way
concerns and stated that right-of-way acquisition was submitted so there would be
flexibility to avoid wetlands mitigation if possible.
Pony Thompson, 5301 Lakeshore Drive, spoke against the trail and discussed property
Mr. Brown is willing to donate to allow the trail to go to the street that would eliminate
acquisition for property along the street, and encourage the Council to consider moving
the trail to the north side of the street, as there are less driveways and businesses.
Staff discussed possible future conflicts when this area is developed. Mr. Thompson
expressed concerns with the view from the street versus the shoreline, reduced
maintenance if moved to the street, lighting along the street and not along the shoreline,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 3 OF 15
Page 3 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
and seclusion of the proposed trail that will promote crime. Residents of Lake Shore
Drive collectively feel it would be best to move the trail to the street.
There was brief discussion regarding lighting, issues with obtaining TxDOT funding if
the trail is moved, and cyclists' and pedestrian safety when the trail crosses streets and
driveways. Mr. Thompson discussed the portion of the trail along Barnett Road and
stated that cyclist's ride on the street and not on the trail in this area, and various
comments were made regarding cyclists currently riding on Lake Shore Drive.
Councilor Jackson asked Mr. Thompson if the residents have maintained the property
along the lake shore and he stated that they have, and that they purchased property
with a lake view and do not want to install fences that block their view.
Ben Block, 4809 Saw Mill Lane, spoke for having the trail along the shoreline. He
expressed safety concerns with cycling on street crossings and stated that he uses the
trail as much as possible and prefers not to ride on the street. He expressed his respect
for the homeowners affected but feels constructing the trail along the shoreline is best
for the City.
Councilor Jackson asked if Mr. Block would like to have a trail in his backyard and Mr.
Block stated that is not what is currently being discussed. After some heated
discussion, Mayor Santellana asked the Council and Citizens to be civil during the
discussion.
Joe Nelson, 2200 Piedmont, spoke against the trail along the shoreline and expressed
privacy concerns for veterans, elderly, and handicapped citizens that live in the area.
Randy Ledford, 5127 Lake Shore Drive, spoke against the trail along the shoreline, and
expressed concerns about acquisition, wetlands, and the map submitted with the grant
application. Mr. Ledford asked about wetlands mitigation, bridges that were not
included in the grant proposal cost projections, and possible acquisition of three
properties including his own. Mr. Schreiber stated that the final design has not been
completed, discussed the map submitted with the grant application, and stated that the
properties crosshatched in blue may require a small part of acquisition, but did not
include the entire property, and the light blue line on the map is the proposed trail area.
Pamela Morath, 5311 Lake Shore Drive, spoke against the trail along the shoreline, and
asked how the trail on Barnett road was funded. Staff noted that it was funded eighty
percent with a TxDOT grant with a twenty percent match. She asked if it was still
funded with road crossings, and Mr. Leiker stated that there were no other options for
that portion of the trail, and discussed the safety measures implemented. Ms. Morath
stated that she is not opposed to the hike and bike trail and supports cyclists, but is
opposed to the trail being along the shoreline. She expressed safety concerns for her
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 4 OF 15
Page 4 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
property and asked why the safety of the cyclists is more important than the safety of
her property.
Mayor Santellana discussed the needs of all tax paying citizens versus the needs of the
group speaking against the trail, and the fiscal responsibility for taxpayer funds. Ms.
Morath expressed concerns regarding increased theft along the trail in unlit areas and
asked how long it would take to build the trail if it is funded. Mr. Schreiber stated that it
would take just under a year. There was brief discussion regarding construction access
points.
Rodney Brown, owner of Larry's Marine, and resident of Lake Shore Drive, spoke
against the trail along the shoreline and discussed his business being number five in the
state for Tracker boat sales, and concerns of how the trail will affect his business. He
acknowledged signing an agreement with the City, but expressed concerns about the
trail taking away the boat storage area. Mr. Brown expressed security concerns, being
able to protect his customers' property, and stated that the trail will be detrimental to his
business.
R.J. Wachsman, discussed the house he built for his brother at 5017 Lake Shore Drive,
and discussed the pitiful condition of Lake Shore Drive and the need for street repairs
regardless of where the trail is built. Mr. Wachsman asked when plans for the trail
would be completed, and Mr. Schreiber stated plans will not be completed until after the
grant is awarded and they have funding for the project. He expressed concerns about
how close the trail will come to his brother's bedroom window, and suggested a bridge
across the lake as a solution.
Mr. Leiker addressed Mr. Wachsman comment regarding rehabilitation of the street and
Mr. Schreiber stated it would cost approximately $6 million and most likely need to be a
bond-funded project in the future.
Michael Lambert, 3 Merryhill Circle, spoke in favor of the trail along the shoreline,
discussed safety issues with riding on Lake Shore Drive, and stated that he feels the
street should not be included as part of the trail. He discussed other areas of the trail
along Holliday Creek that have water across it when there is heavy rain, and how this
extension should not be any different from other areas of the trail regarding safety and
crime. Mr. Lambert stated the City should provide for the common good for all residents.
Barbara Lyne, 5119 Lake Shore Drive, spoke against the trail along the shoreline, and
discussed concerns regarding how close the trail would be to her home. After
clarification of the proposed trail location, she supported the trail with a bridge, but
expressed concerns for other property owners and stated that she still supports moving
the trail to the street. Ms. Lyne expressed concerns regarding the ability to sell property
with trail directly behind the home.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 5 OF 15
Page 5 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Becky Raeke, 2420 Reilly Road, spoke in favor of the trail along the shoreline, and
discussed her involvement in the community, and Bike Wichita Falls. Ms. Raeke
discussed the mission of Bike Wichita Falls and the importance of cycling in our
community. She discussed a poll she created in the Wichita Falls Bicycling Facebook
group that resulted in 117 in favor of the trail along the shoreline, 11 opposed with 5 of
those being new to the group and residents of Lake Shore Drive, and one undecided.
She met with a homeowner on Lake Shore Drive, toured the properties most affected,
discussed the diversity of views along the trail, and expressed concerns regarding the
increased cost to move the trail. She acknowledged the need for Larry's Marine to be
able to do business, and stated that increased crime is not encouraged but deterred
along the trail. Ms. Raeke read an article regarding how the opinion of an individual
once opposed to a trail in their backyard changed after the trail was built and they
realized the benefits of the trail. She asked that citizens keep an open mind, and stated
that a minority should not make the decision for the majority, as there is always
opposition to any project, but we do not say no due to the opinions of the minority.
Ellen Gutow, Brook Village, spoke against the trail along the shoreline, and asked if any
Councilors took her challenge to look at how the trail will affect their property. She
stated the trail is an amenity and not a necessity, and it would be easy to move the trail
to the street and improve the street at the same time. Ms. Gutow asked if an
environmental study had been completed on the wetlands.
Carla Schmehl, 1 Summer Tree Court, spoke against the trail along the shoreline and
read a letter from a cyclist, Joe Castelli, 4532 Wendover Street, which discussed his
involvement in cycling, and stated his concerns with the negative impact to the property
owners affected by the proposed trail. She then discussed her concerns for the
homeowners affected and suggested that the council had newfound fiscal responsibility
regarding this particular project. Ms. Schmehl acknowledged the benefit of many versus
the affects on the few, but asked that Council consider moving the trail to the street or
making shared bicycle lane like the ones we have on other streets.
Steve DuBose, 1609 Brazos, stated that most of his questions have been answered but
he asked that the Council respect the privacy of the property owners, and suggested
that the trail be completed in conjunction with repairs to Lakeshore Drive that must
eventually be completed.
Roby Christie, 3309 Cumberland, spoke in favor of the trail along the shoreline, and
discussed the history of trails in Wichita Falls. Mr. Christie acknowledged the small
percent that object to the trail along the shoreline, discussed the growth of trails in the
Dallas-Fort Worth area adjacent to citizen's property, and stated that property rights end
at the property line and not into the view past the property line. He stated that all
taxpayers own the land along the shoreline past the property lines and they should be
able to use that land, and encouraged the Council to build the trail along the shoreline.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 6 OF 15
Page 6 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Jack Murphy, 2812 Happy Hollow Drive, spoke in favor of the trail along the shoreline,
discussed the recreational and healthy living benefits of the trail, the history of the initial
trail, and the vision of the circle trail project. Mr. Murphy stated that trails are one of the
few activities that serve all citizens, noted that Lake Shore Drive is narrow and curvy
with many driveways and is unsafe for cyclists, and stated that the completed circle trail
be one of the best recreational trails in Texas.
Jim Heiman, 1805 Club View Street, Chair of the Wichita Falls Parks Board, spoke in
favor of the trail along the shoreline, and discussed the support from the Parks Board.
He emphasized the use of city owned property for the benefit of all citizens, and stated
that the Park Board voted unanimously to encourage the Council to complete the entire
circle trail project including the section as planned along the shoreline.
Maurice Gauthier, 4809 Whirlwind Drive, noted that this property was not city owned
property until the lake level was lowered.
Councilor Jackson apologized to everyone for his outburst earlier in the meeting.
Councilor Browning thanked everyone for coming to speak, and wanted citizens to know
that he has spoken with both sides, visited the area affected, and he and the Council
want to hear both sides.
Councilor Brewer thanked everyone for attending and expressing both sides. He stated
that everyone's views are important, and thanked staff for their presentations.
Mayor Santellana thanked everyone for attending and expressing both sides, and for
the emails and letters of support. He noted that this project is still preliminary as it is not
funded, but he wanted to get the facts out to the public before the many steps that will
have to take place before the project moves forward. Council will consider everything
and will allow the public to hear both sides. There will be time for public input, and he
encouraged citizens to reach out to the Council or staff with their questions and
concerns.
Mayor Santellana recessed the meeting for break at 11:12 a.m, and reconvened the
meeting at 11:26 a.m.
Item 4-6 — Consent Items
11:26 a.m.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 7 OF 15
Page 7 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Darron Leiker, City Manager, gave a briefing on the items listed under the Consent
Agenda.
Moved by Councilor Smith to approve the items on the consent agenda.
Motion seconded by Councilor Browning and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
Item 4 — Approval of minutes of the October 5, 2021, Regular Meeting of the Mayor
and City Council
Item 5 — Resolution 115-2021
Resolution authorizing the purchase of One hundred fifty (150) Axon/lasers and related
accessories and warranties through the BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative from Axon
Enterprise, Inc. in the amount of$492,500.08.
Item 6 — Receive Minutes
(a) Library Advisory Board, June 15, 2021
(b) Lake Wichita Revitalization Committee, September 14, 2021
Item 7a — Ordinance 51-2021
11:26 a.m.
Ordinance appropriating $41,612.93 of grant funds pursuant to the Office of the Governor,
Public Safety Office, Homeland Security Grants Division, 2021 State Homeland Security
Program, appropriating said funds to the Special Revenue Fund, and authorizing the City
Manager to execute all documents necessary to accept and share said funds.
Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Ordinance 51-2021.
Motion seconded by Councilor Jackson and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 8 OF 15
Page 8 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Item 7b — Ordinance 53-2021
11:29 a.m.
Consider and adopt an ordinance by the City Council of the City of Wichita Falls, Texas,
repealing Chapter 2, Article III, Division 8 Youth Activities Advisory Council; and Chapter
26, Article V, Division 2, Metal Recycling Entity, from the City of Wichita Falls Code of
Ordinances.
Moved by Councilor Chenault to approve Ordinance 53-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Browning, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
Mayor Santellana moved to item 8h
Item 8h — Resolution 123-2021
11:31 a.m.
Resolution approving the programs and expenditures of the Wichita Falls Economic
Development Corporation (WFEDC/4A) by amending the budget to include an up to
$16,000 expenditure to Falls Metal Fabrication, LLC, to assist in the expansion of their
existing business in Wichita Falls.
Moved by Councilor Chenault to approve Resolution 123-2021.
Motion seconded by Councilor Browning and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
Item 8a — Resolution 116-2021
11:36 a.m.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 9 OF 15
Page 9 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Convention Center Management
and Lease Agreement with O'Reilly Hospitality Management, LLC for the day-to-day
management and operation of the Convention Center.
Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Resolution 116-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Browning and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, and Smith.
Nays: Councilor Jackson
Item 8b — Resolution 117-2021
11:42 a.m.
Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Tax Abatement Agreement with OH-
Wichita Falls, LLC related to their project where they will spend approximately $48 million
to build a full service convention hotel on the property known as Lot 1-C, Block 1 of MPEC
South Addition and owned by OH-Wichita Falls, LLC, which is in the Convention Center
Reinvestment Zone.
Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Resolution 117-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Browning and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, and Smith.
Nays: Councilor Jackson
Item 8c — Resolution 118-2021
11:47 a.m.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for the MPEC Sewer
Project to Bowles Construction Co. in the amount of$97,100.00.
Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 118-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, and Smith.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 10 OF 15
Page 10 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Nays: Councilor Jackson
Item 8d — Resolution 119-2021
11:49 a.m.
Resolution authorizing the purchase of one (1) Front Loader through the Houston-
Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Purchasing Cooperative from Bruckner Truck Sales,
Inc. in the amount of $154,387.00 and through the BuyBoard Purchasing Cooperative
from Texan Waste Equipment Rentals & Sales, LLC dba Heil of Texas in the amount of
$184,900.00.
Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Resolution 119-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Browning and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
Item 8e — Resolution 120-2021
11:52 a.m.
Resolution authorizing the purchase of three (3) Automated Side Loaders through the
Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Purchasing Cooperative from Bruckner Truck
Sales, Inc. in the amount of $479,409.00 and through the BuyBoard Purchasing
Cooperative from Texan Waste Equipment Rentals & Sales, LLC dba Heil of Texas in the
amount of$551,700.
Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 120-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
Item 8f— Resolution 121-2021
11:54 a.m.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 11OF15
Page 11 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
Resolution authorizing the purchase of two (2) Pinnacle 64T Daycab Macks through the
Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Purchasing Cooperative from Bruckner Truck
Sales, Inc. in the amount of$288,196.00.
Moved by Councilor Browning to approve Resolution 121-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Smith and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
Item 8q — Resolution 122-2021
11:55 a.m.
Resolution authorizing the purchase of one (1) Commercial Side Loader through the
Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Purchasing Cooperative from Bruckner Truck
Sales, Inc. in the amount of $145,311.00 and from Kann Manufacturing Corporation in
the amount of$108,362.00.
Moved by Councilor Brewer to approve Resolution 122-2021 .
Motion seconded by Councilor Chenault and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Santellana, Councilors Brewer, Chenault, Jackson, and Smith.
Nays: None
Item 9a— Staff Report— Fire Apparatus Replacement
11:56 a.m.
John Burrus, Director of AT&T, gave a presentation regarding the Fire Apparatus
Replacement Program, and discussed availability of the needed units. Mr. Burrus
discussed the current inventory, issues with current inventory, reserve units, and
recommendations for replacement. We currently do not have enough reserve units to
pull in when needed and have had to rely on other area Fire Departments to step in to
help. Mr. Burrus discussed the Apparatus Committee formed in 2021 that includes
operators and mechanic staff, and the committee recommendations to purchase 8
engines, 2 ladders, 2 squads, and 1 rescue vehicle. Mr. Burrus discussed the reserve
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 12 OF 15
Page 12 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
capacity, life expectancy of the front line units, and funding recommendations due to
anticipated price increases. He recommended a $9,920,692.31, twelve-year lease
purchase agreement resulting in the city owning the equipment.
Jessica Williams, Director of Finance/CFO, discussed the financing portion, with first
payment not expected until 2023. Financing goals are to lock in low interest rates and
having the first payment due after the current lease expires. She discussed the timeline
and the anticipated bid award for financing on November 16, 2021, with the budget
expenditure in FY 2023-24. She stated the current lease payment is $475,000 and the
new lease would cause an increase. Ms. Williams discussed options to reduce the
payment amounts such as a down payment, but we will not know the options until after
the proposals are received. She discussed possible savings due to reduced maintenance
issues.
There was brief discussion regarding the possibility of leasing instead of lease purchase
and parts availability for both situations. The recommendation will allow fleet
maintenance to have an inventory of parts that can be used across all frontline units.
Ken Prillaman, Fire Chief, expressed the need for new apparatus, the condition of current
equipment, and the low value of the Ferrara units. He discussed the issue from the
firefighter equipment operator's perspective, and the loss of confidence in the current
equipment. Other positives are standardized training, reduced pressure on future
equipment purchase budgets, and will no longer have to take a unit out of service for
training.
Mr. Leiker discussed the length of time this issue has been discussed, and the upcoming
request for proposals and timeline.
There was brief discussion regarding the funding, future budget year increases, and
possible use of grant funds to buy down the lease purchase.
Item 9b— Announcements concerning items of community interest from members
of the City Council.
12:41 p.m.
Councilor Browning stated his excitement for the hotel project and congratulated the
Mayor on the first annual Taco Fest as it was a success.
Councilor Chenault said good morning and thanked everyone for coming out.
Councilor Jackson thanked everyone for coming out and reminded citizens that early
voting has started and Election Day is on November 2nd, and he encouraged everyone to
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 13 OF 15
Page 13 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
get out and vote. He thanked New York for the donation of a fire truck to the Wichita
West fire department. Councilor Jackson stated that he believes that everyone from the
Mayor down should have to take a drug test, that he had a hair follicle test completed,
and recommended that the Mayor and Council do the same. He discussed concerns
regarding the Mayor's business selling rebar and concrete for city projects and stated he
feels it is unethical. Mayor Santellana asked Kinley Hegglund, City Attorney to address
those concerns.
Mr. Hegglund stated that the Mayor does not violate state law or the charter by selling
products to a contractor for a city project, and that this was permissible under the old
charter prior to the amendments.
Councilor Jackson left the meeting at 12:45 p.m.
Mayor Santellana disclosed to the public that he does bid as a subcontractor for City
projects within the limits of the law. He is not allowed to directly contract with the City but
he is legally able to subcontract. Councilor Browning agreed and stated that they are not
on the council to make money, but have had to give up work due to being on the Council.
Councilor Chenault stated that her last full meeting is November 2nd and she encouraged
District 2 citizens to attend.
Mayor Santellana discussed issues with decorum during the meeting and how it is
unacceptable behavior. He stated that in the future he would strive to keep the meeting
in order, as the discourse today was embarrassing. He wants everyone to have input
and representation, but in the future, he will recess the meeting if emotions get out of
control. David Gibbs, VFW Post 8878 shared an invitation with the Mayor and invited
everyone to Sikes Lake on October 23, 2021, from 10:00-3:00 for a Veterans event. Taco
Fest was a great success and Mayor Santellana gave credit to Zavala for the success
and stated that he was encouraged about the money raised which will be used for
scholarships.
Councilor Chenault reminded citizens of the neighborhood revitalization meetings this
weekend at 9:00, 11:00 and 2:00 at Floral Heights Methodist Church. Terry Floyd
encouraged citizens to look at information on the website.
Item 10 — Comments from the Public to Members of the City Council Concerning
Items That Are Not on the City Council Agenda
12:52 p.m.
Gary Morath, 5311 Lake Shore Drive, apologized for his emotions earlier, but stated they
bought this land to build their forever home on and he never expected anything to be built
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 14 OF 15
Page 14 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
behind him. It is his home, not a house, and he has no desire to sell it. He discussed
how his property did previously touch the water's edge, and how water touches his
property throughout the year with heavy rains. He discussed the jagged contour of his
property and his property line, and stated the trail will have to either go over the water or
encompass some of his property. He understands the water is lower, but when he
purchased the property his property line went to the water's edge and he never anticipated
having anything built behind him due to that.
Judy Whittington, 5205 Lake Shore Drive, stated that she is a retired CPA, former Director
of Finance for Wichita Falls ISD and former County employee and is accustomed to
looking at multi-million dollar numbers. She suggested that some of the numbers
presented today mixed apples and oranges. She believes Lake Shore Drive is on the
long term street improvement plan, and believes there is probably an estimate in archives.
She suggested looking at the cost of bringing Lake Shore Drive up to standard and then
look at the cost to add the bike lane, as she feels they would have a better view of what
it would cost to build a bike lane on Lakeshore Drive versus the proposal in the grant.
Item 11 — Executive Session
No executive session was held.
Item 12 —Adjourn
Mayor Santellana adjourned the meeting at 1:01 p.m.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of November 2021.
Stephen L. Santellana, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marie Balthrop, TRMC, MMC
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 19, 2021
PAGE 15 OF 15
Page 15 of 15
Agenda Item No.4.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of twelve (12)
2022 Ford Utility Police Interceptors from the low bidder Wichita Falls
Ford-Lincoln, Inc. in the amount of $419,568.48.
INITIATING DEPT: Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: Bids were opened October 18, 2021 for the purchase of twelve (12)
2022 Police Patrol Utility Vehicles. Eleven (11) of these will be for the Police Department
to replace aging units. One (1) will be a new unit for the Regional Airport. Three bids were
received, all meet specifications. The new vehicles will replace those that have either
exceeded their useful life or have been involved in accidents and are no longer useable.
The qualified bids were received as follows:
Dealer Model Unit Cost Total
Sam Pack's Five Star Ford Interceptor $35,795 $429,180.00
Carrollton TX
Silsbee Ford Interceptor $34,975.70 $419,708.40
Silsbee TX
Wichita Falls Ford Lincoln Interceptor $34,964.04 $419,568.48
Wichita Falls TX
Staff recommends the purchase of twelve (12) 2022 Ford Utility Police Interceptors from
the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford Lincoln, Inc. in the amount of$419,568.48.
Budgeted amount: $438,000.00
Actual Cost: $419,568.48
Savings: $18,431.52
® Director of Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.A
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
111
Zaistalli
iik
PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.A
10;1812021 BID TABULATION
BID 21-17
2022 POLICE PATROL UTILITY VEHICLES
(12 EACH)
VENDOR MODEL EACH TOTAL
SAM PACK'S FIVE STAR FORD 2022 Police $35,765.O0 S429,150.00
CARROLLTON TX Interceptor
SILSBEE FORD Ford PILP $34,975.70 $s419,708.40
SILSBEE TX
WICHITA FALLS FORD Ford $34,864.04 $419,565.4B
WICHITA FALLS TX InIercepter
PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.A
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of twelve (12)
2022 Ford Utility Police Interceptors from the low bidder, Wichita Falls
Ford-Lincoln, Inc. in the amount of$419,568.48
WHEREAS the City of Wichita Falls advertised and requested bids for the
purchase of twelve (12) police patrol utility vehicles; and,
WHEREAS, bids were received and publicly opened on October 18, 2021; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to purchase twelve (12) police patrol utility
vehicles.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
City staff is authorized to execute all documents necessary to purchase twelve (12)
2022 Ford Utility Police Interceptors from the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc.
in the amount of $419,568.48.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.A
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of eight (8) 3/4-
ton pickup trucks from the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln,
Inc., in the amount of$213,266.25.
INITIATING DEPT: Aviation Traffic & Transportation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: Bids were opened October 18, 2021, for the purchase of two (2) 3/4-
ton pickup trucks, one (1) 3/4-ton cab and chassis, one (1) 3/4-ton extended cab 4x4 pickup
and four (4) 3/4-ton 4x4 pickups. Three bids were received (bid tabulation attached). The
purchases are to replace existing vehicles that have exceeded their useful life.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution authorizing the purchases totaling
$213,266.25 to the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc.
These units will replace aging 3/4 ton pickups in the fleet. It will also upgrade several
divisions' response in the event of inclement winter weather. One of the eight units is an
above current purchase for Water Distribution.
Budgeted Amount: $265,000.00
Actual Cost: $213,266.25
Savings: $51,733.75
® Director of Traffic & Transportation
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.B
- @ID TABULATION
BID 21-18
3)4 TON PICKUPS
VENDOR MODELREG CAB RI REG CAB 4X4(4) BED EXT CAB
rn,r:u I rnru 1M I TCST L1 DELETE 4 4X4
I'AI1ErdSOMAU1L CtMrEI I1ci V 3?t•.°M..6? Sr1.8%' ,Y) S ..Pa:,C.. yl',3I.,I„r(;(1 534,1i.29.5bl S11.26G.T4
WICHI1AFALLS 1X 2WO
SAM PACK'S FIRE STAR FOIL) FCd 52/Az 559.410 S2J.9/6 Sr 199G4 S25. S 556.4':-
CARROLLTON TX 1250
r.If.-.1 I A.FALLS FORD FCid S26139.18 1',3 4 R. ..YD S25.66&1.6r0 5102.326/U 525,551 y.
5."IC-ITA FALLS TX F2✓0
Ilir 11 . ".•
41146
•
ri
,. ry
i 5
11.E ,,.utM+,a . r',+:,,
,,,,,...0 AN14110111111.06 I ,;7"
'''‘. ',,z,4,:,1 :(0,1
4 uu
dry =,.
4.
4 .... fillf. "
.... 1 7 1 1 nor !
PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.B
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of eight 3/4-ton
pickup trucks from the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc., in
the amount of$213,266.25
WHEREAS, the City advertised and requested bids for the purchase of eight 3/4-
ton pickup trucks; and,
WHEREAS, bids were received and publicly opened on October 18, 2021; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the lowest responsible bidder was Wichita
Falls Ford Lincoln, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
City staff are authorized to execute all documents necessary to purchase eight 3/4-
ton pickup trucks from Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc., in the amount of $213,266.25.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.B
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of two (2) 1-ton
trucks from the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc., in the
amount of$59,947.86.
INITIATING DEPT: Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently deliver city services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice effective governance
COMMENTARY: Bids were opened October 18, 2021 , for the purchase of one 1-ton
crew cab pickup for Parks Maintenance and one 1-ton regular cab pickup for Wastewater
Collections. Three bids were received (bid tabulation attached). The purchases are to
replace existing vehicles that have exceeded their useful life.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution authorizing the purchases totaling
$59,947.86.
The items are included in the FY2021 budget. The unit for Wastewater Collections is an
above current purchase, and the unit for Parks Maintenance replaces a 2004 Dodge with
over 186,000 miles of service.
Budgeted Amount: $80,000.00
Actual Cost: $59,947.86
Savings: $20,052.14
® Director of Traffic & Transportation
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.0
1 011 81202 1 BID TABULATION
BI❑ 21-19
1 TON TRUCKS
VENDOR MODEL REG CAB CREW CAB TOTAL
PATTERSON AUTO CENTER Dodge $36,781.49 $39,066.59 $75,848.08
WICHITA FALLS TX 3500
SAM PACK'S FIVE STAR FOR❑ Ford $30,998 $33,326 $64,324
CARROLLTON TX F350
WICHITA FALLS FORD Ford $28,192.66 $31,755.20 $59,947.86
WICHITA FALLS TX F350
PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.0
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of two 1-ton
trucks from the low bidder, Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc., in the
amount of $59,947.86
WHEREAS, the City advertised and requested bids for the purchase of two 1-ton
trucks; and,
WHEREAS, bids were received and publicly opened on October 18, 2021; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the lowest responsible bidder was Wichita
Falls Ford Lincoln, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
City staff are authorized to execute all documents necessary to purchase two 1-
ton trucks from Wichita Falls Ford-Lincoln, Inc., in the amount of$59,947.86.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.0
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of two (2)
33,000 GVW crew trucks from the low bidder, TNTX, LLC dba
Lonestar Truck Group, in the amount of$185,186.00.
INITIATING DEPT: Aviation, Traffic, & Transportation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: Bids were opened October 14, 2021, for the purchase of two 33,000
GVW crew trucks. The units will be comprised of Freightliner M2 cab and chassis with
RKI service bodies. Four bids were received as follows:
Lonestar Truck Group Freightliner M2 $92,593.00 $185,186.00
Wichita Falls, Texas
Sam Pack's Five Star Ford F-750 $92,651.00 $185,302.00
Carrollton, Texas
Summit Truck Group International MV $93,937.69 $187,875.38
Wichita Falls, Texas
Bruckner's Truck Sales Mack MD7 $108,171.00 $216,342.00
Wichita Falls, Texas
Staff recommends the purchase of two 33,000 GVW crew trucks from Lonestar Truck
Group in the amount of$185,186.00.
Budgeted Amount: $190,000.00
Actual Cost: $185,186.00
Savings: $4,814.00
® Director of Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.D
1 011 412 02 1 BID TABULATION
BID 21-20
33,000 GVW C&C CREW TRUCKS & 5-YARD DUMP TRUCK
MANDATORY PRE-BID
(2 ADDENDUMS)
VENDOR MODEL CREW TRUCKS(2) 5-YD DUMP
EACH TOTAL TRUCK
BRUCKNER'S TRUCK SALES Mack $108,171 $216,342 No Bid
WICHITA FALLS,TX MD7
LONESTAR TRUCK GROUP Freightliner $91,908 $183,816 $96,151
WICHITA FALLS,TX M2 Knapheide Body Davis Body
$92,593 $185,186 $98,364
RKI Body Ledwell Body
SAM PACK'S FIVE STAR FORD Ford $90,892 $181,784 $96,602
CARROLLTON,TX F-750 RKI Body/RKI Crane Warren Body
2023
$92,651 $185,302
RKI Body/Liflmoore Crane
$95,886 $191,772
Knapheide Body/Stellar Crane
SUMMIT TRUCK GROUP International $93,937.69 $187,875 $99,425.71
WICHITA FALLS,TX MV
PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.D
� y
w
(1 6 ' * '' ' '6"" V" --..‘ '.1 6
IF
J I
i
PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.D
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of two (2) 33,000
GVW crew trucks from the low bidder, TNTX, LLC dba Lonestar Truck
Group, in the amount of $185,186.00
WHEREAS, the City advertised and requested bids for the purchase of two 33,000
GVW crew trucks; and,
WHEREAS, bids were received and publicly opened on October 14, 2021 ; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the lowest responsible bidder was Lonestar
Truck Group
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
City staff are authorized to execute all documents necessary to purchase two
33,000 GVW crew trucks from TNTX, LLC dba Lonestar Truck Group, in the amount of
$185,186.00.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021 .
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.D
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing award of bid to Retail Motorcycle Ventures,
Inc. for the purchase of three (3) BMW Police Motorcycles in the
amount of$84,923.31 .
INITIATING DEPT: Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: In the summer of 2012 the Kawasaki Motors Corporation suspended
shipments of the Concourse 14P motorcycle after determining an electrical issue
increasing the risk of a crash. As a result, the motorcycle unit along with Fleet
Maintenance began evaluating other alternatives.
After researching the Harley Davidson, BMW, Victory Commander and Honda, the Harley
Davidson and BMW units were test driven. The BMW 1200 RTP was selected over the
Harley Davidson for performance and handling.
Bids were received October 18, 2021 , for the purchase of three (3) each BMW
motorcycles. One (1) qualifying bid was received.
The Police Department is very satisfied with the operation and performance of the BMW
Motorcycles. This purchase will bring the total number of BMW Motorcycles to 15 units,
12 to be in use and 3 for backup and training.
Staff recommends the purchase of three (3) BMW Police Motorcycles from Retail
Motorcycle Venture Inc. in the amount of$84,923.31.
Budgeted Amount: $87,000.00
Actual Cost: $84,923.31
Savings: $2,076.69
® Director of Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.E
--
..� ,..,.x. w... -._____„
',
_ .4',,, / . -,:..),-,,,, bp.7.e.::-' -
��
r
.. !
id COI
C44::)... '
J, may
�. fir.. i 4,1 `,. 1 J
4
. ____
WV
01 ....,
,)
PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.E
10i1812021 BID TABULA-ION
BID 21-21
POLICE MOTORCYCLES
(3 EACH)
VENDOR MODEL EACH TOTAL
BMW MOTORCYCLES OF N. DALLAS BMW R1250 RT-P $ 28,307.77 $ 84.923.31
PLANO,TX
PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.E
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing award of bid to Retail Motorcycle Ventures, Inc.
for the purchase of three (3) BMW Police Motorcycles in the amount
of $84,923.31
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls advertised and requested bids for the
purchase of three (3) police motorcycles, and
WHEREAS, bids were received and publically opened on October 18, 2021, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to purchase three (3) police motorcycles for
the Police Motors Division.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
Authorization is granted to award bid for three (3) police motorcycles to Retail
Motorcycle Ventures, Inc. in the amount of$84,923.31 .
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.E
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the purchase of one (1) John Deere 310L
backhoe with breaker through the Sourcewell Purchasing
Cooperative from Yellowhouse Machinery Co. in the amount of
$133,220.00.
INITIATING DEPT: Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Delivery City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: This unit will be comprised of a John Deere 310L backhoe from
Yellowhouse Machinery Co. in the amount of $133,220.00. This unit will also replace a
2004 Case backhoe and bayonet breaker.
Texas Local Government Local Government Code §252.022 exempts items purchased
through interlocal cooperative purchasing contracts from the State's competitive bidding
requirements. This chapter does not apply to expenditure for. . . (12) personal property
sold. . . under an interlocal contract for cooperative purchasing administered by a regional
planning commission established under Chapter 391.
Staff recommends the purchase of one (1) John Deere 310L backhoe with breaker
through the Sourcewell Purchasing Cooperative in the amount of$133,220.00.
Budgeted Cost: $135,000.00
Actual Cost: $133,220.00
Budget Savings: $1,780.00
® Purchasing ® Director of Aviation, Traffic & Transportation
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.5.F
r u ir/
;$,
"
or ,,„;.,:1- . '''''' - i:k 1 : .- '"i. 1 1
A c11
r
111
PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.5.F
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the purchase of one (1) John Deere 310L
backhoe with breaker through the Sourcewell Purchasing Cooperative
from Yellowhouse Machinery Co. in the amount of $133,220.00
WHEREAS, Texas Local Government Local Government Code §252.022 exempts
items purchased through interlocal cooperative purchasing contracts from the State's
competitive bidding requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wichita Falls has passed a resolution
approving the participation in such cooperative agreements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that Yellowhouse Machinery Co. is offering one
(1) John Deere 310L backhoe with breaker through the Sourcewell Purchasing
Cooperative, and it is in the best interest to purchase equipment in accordance with the
Cooperative Purchasing Programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
City Staff is authorized to execute all documents necessary to purchase one (1)
John Deere 310L backhoe with breaker through the Sourcewell Purchasing Cooperative
from Yellowhouse Machinery Co. in the amount of$133,220.00.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.5.F
LANDMARK COMMISSION
MINUTES
August 24, 2021
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Michele Derr ■ Chairperson
John Dickinson or Member
Christy Graham ■ Member
Joel Hartmangruber ■Member
Andy Lee ■Member
Noros Martin ■ PB.z Liaison
Nadine McKown ■vice-Chairperson
Janel Ponder Smith ■ Member
Marcela Medellin ■Member
Terry Floyd, Development Services Director ■ City Staff
Karen Gagne, Planning Administrator • City Staff
Christal Ashcraft, Development Services Assistant ■ city Staff
ABSENT:
Tim Brewer ■ Council Liaison
I. Call to Order, Welcome and Introductions
Chairperson Michele Derr called the meeting to order at 12:06 p.m. Ms. Derr had
Commission members, staff and guest, introduce themselves.
II. Review & Approval of Minutes from: June 22nd 2021
Chairperson Michele Derr called for review and approval of the June 22nd 2021 Landmark
Commission meeting minutes. Ms. Christy Graham made a motion to approve the minutes,
Ms. Janel Ponder-Smith seconded the motion. Minutes were unanimously approved.
III. Action Item: Design Review — 2908-2910 10th Street (West Floral Heights Historic
District)
• Installation of a New 6ft. Wooden Privacy Fence on Two Residential Lots
(Residential)
Ms. Karen Gagne presented the case and stated this case was brought to the attention of
staff from a report by a concerned citizen. Visible preparation of a fence was in place at
2908 & 2910 10th Street. A stop work order was issued by staff on July 26th. The home
owners, whom own both properties, submitted a design review application and was advised
no further work could continue until the Landmark Commission convened today.
The structure located at 2908 10th Street is a Craftsman home, constructed in 1925. This
is a contributing historic structure to the district with very few changes in the last decade.
The property located at 2910 10th Street has had significant changes. Previously, this
vacant lot had a two-story Prairie style home, built in 1919. The structure became a life,
Page 1 of 5
Agenda Item No.6.a
Landmark Commission 2 August 24,2021
health and safety concern within the neighborhood and had significant resident complaints
and issues with deteriorating conditions inside and on-site as well. The structure ended up
being a code hazard and was demolished leaving a vacant lot. The owners are proposing
to fence around the home on 2908 10th Street and the front of the vacant lot on 2910 10th
Street.
An example of the proposed 6ft. wooden board-on-board/top rail privacy fence was shown
to the Commission. Ms. Gagne advised, design guidelines state fencing in the front 25ft.
setback is not allowed in the West Floral Heights Historic District. In photos it appears to
comply with that setback and in line with the building line of the homes at 2912 and 2908
10th Street.
Ms. Gagne stated staff had been in contact with the owner through his bi-lingual daughter
and was advised it would be beneficial for someone to represent the owner to be present
at the meeting. The owner was not present and was not sure all details were understood
and/or relayed to the owner. Ms. Gagne stated if the Commission had any questions she
would try to answer them to the best of her ability.
Commission members discussed where the 25ft. setback line was on the property and how
construction placement of the fence would be regulated. Ms. Gagne stated verification of
the setback could be a stipulation to the approval if the Commission so desired.
Commission member asked why the posts had already been set before the meeting. Ms.
Gagne advised this was where construction was at when the stop work order was issued.
The motion to approve the installation of a 6ft. wooden privacy fence at 2908 and 2910 10th
Street with the condition it meets the 25ft. building setback was made by Ms. Ponder-Smith
and seconded by Mr, Noros Martin. The motion passed unanimously.
IV. Action Item: Design Review—615 8th Street—John O'Donohoe/Anderson Bean Building
City of Wichita Falls Landmark #25, Iron Horse Pub
• Replacement of Two Alley Doors & Repainting of the Entire Building (Commercial)
Ms. Gagne stated action items 4, 5 & 6 had been submitted by Landmark Commission
member John Dickinson, whom had recused himself from voting on these items.
The Anderson Bean Building located at 615 8th Street is known as the Iron Horse Pub. It is
the City of Wichita Falls Landmark #25 and abuts the Depot Square Historic District. This
4,500 sf. commercial building was constructed in 1882 by M.M. (Major) Templeton. John
O'Donohoe, an early oil and gas pioneer had an office in the building during 1916, and went
on to be a well-respected leader in the petroleum industry marrying Carrie Kell (Frank Kell's
daughter). Other business ventures associated with this building included, Wichita Power
& Light Company, Floral Heights Realty & Wichita Truck. The original building was a two-
story with brick façade composed of three store fronts.
Mr. John Dickinson is requesting to replace two alley doors and repaint the faded, pealing,
and chipping of the building that was originally painted in 2003. The two existing metal
doors are in poor condition. The replacement doors will have an additional box to lock for
Page 2 of 5
Agenda Item No.6.a
Landmark Commission 3 August 24,2021
security and have panic hardware. There will be no change to the opening for the doors.
The replacement doors will match in style, material and finish.
Ms. Gagne turned the floor over to Mr. Dickinson for any questions. Chairwomen Derr
asked the Commission if there were any questions or comments. Mr. Andy Lee made the
motion to approve this request. Ms. Christy Graham seconded the motion. The motion
passed unanimously.
V. Action Item: Design Review— 604 7th Street— Former Pfaeffle Building (Depot Square
Historic District)
• Replacement Flat Roof (Commercial)
• Repair Rear Wall (Commercial)
**Commission Member John Dickinson is the applicant/owner and has recused himself
Ms. Gagne stated the subject property was located in the 600 block of 7th Street and is a
contributing structure in the Depot Square Historic District. The building was constructed in
1894 and owned and operated as a jewelry store by diamond broker, George Plaeffle.
Street facade is essentially unchanged since 2013. The original awning supports, chain
and rosettes are in place which is reminiscent of 1900's design.
Mr. Dickinson is requesting to replace the roof, which is not visible from the public right-of-
way. The roof will remain flat, modified bitumen, with 2 inch rigid insulation. Also, not visible
from the public right-of-way is a deteriorated wall with an access of only 3ft. between
buildings. Mr. Dickinson is requesting the removal of a window air conditioning unit and to
repair the hole in the rear facade. Ms. Gagne turned the floor over to Mr. Dickinson for
further discussion. Mr. Dickinson stated the pictures of the roof do not show the extent of
the hail damage done to the roof.
Chairperson Derr asked if there were any other questions or comments. Ms. Christy
Graham made a motion to approve the proposal. Ms. Ponder-Smith seconded, the motion
was unanimously approved.
VI. Action Item: Design Review—606 & 608 7th Street—Former Savoy Hotel (Depot Square
Historic District)
• General Maintenance/Repair, including repoint mortar joints (Commercial)
• Replace Missing Brick (Commercial)
**Commission Member John Dickinson is the applicant/owner and has recused himself
Ms. Gagne stated the subject property 606 & 608 7th Street, was abutting the previous case
heard at 604 71" Street. The subject property is a two-story building, formerly known as the
Savoy Hotel, constructed in 1912 and is a contributing structure to the historic district. The
building was the Oil Exchange bar in 1915 and in the 1940's was the Waldorf Hotel. The
structure has brick window frame offsets with alternating floor and ceiling brick relief
features. Brick dentil work accents the roof line and the original rosettes and awning
apparatus are still in use.
Page 3 of 5
Agenda Item No.6.a
Landmark Commission 4 August 24,2021
Ms. Gagne showed photos of the deteriorated brick and motor on the rear wall and sides
of structure that is not visible from the right-of-way. Mr. Dickinson is requesting permission
to repair/replace the missing brick and repair/replace motor as well as interior remodel and
removal of the false ceiling.
Ms. Gagne turned the floor over to Mr. Dickinson for further discussion. Mr. Dickinson
stated at some point workers had lapped the roof over the brick and tarred it as well. He
would like to remove the tar and prepare it for future roof replacement. There is also four
layers of brick over the window arch that does not match the current brick and had built up
the parapet and would like to remove and replace with matching brick.
Mr. Martin asked Mr. Dickinson if he thought he would be able to match the brick and Mr.
Dickinson stated, yes he would. Ms. Trice asked if he was going to replace just the one
layer of brick on top of the arch or all four. Mr. Dickinson stated, he was only going to do
one layer to match. Chairwomen Derr reminded the Commission this was not visible from
the right-of-way.
Chairperson Derr asked if there were any other questions or comments. Ms. Christy
Graham made a motion to approve the proposal. Mr. Andy Lee seconded, the motion was
unanimously approved.
VII. Other Business:
a) Monthly Reports
Depot Square:
Ms. Derr gave downtown updates:
• Aug. 28th—Hotter'n Hell
• Aug. 28th —Hotter'n Ale — Downtown Development
• Aug. 27th— Backdoor Theater— Evening of Improv @ 7:30pm
• Aug. 30th—The Holt Hotel Grand Opening 95 years ago
• Sept. 2nd—Art Walk
• Sept. 9th -Texoma Gives
• Sept. 10th —Wichita Theater—Agatha Christy's Mouse Trap
• Sept. 17th —Wichita Theater—Jersey Tenors
• Sept. 18th —Wichita Theater—The Decedents, The Musical
• Farmer's Market—Open Tue., Thurs., and Sat.
West Floral Heights:
Ms. Ponder-Smith update:
• Trying to get neighborhood more active
b) Updates:
• 1512 Tilden — Little progress made, to go back before City Council
• Indiana Avenue National Register District Project
c) Section 106 Reviews:
• 1411 N. Village Drive — proposed communication tower
Page 4 of 5
Agenda Item No.6.a
Landmark Commission 5 August 24,2021
• 1026 Central Freeway — proposed communication tower
d) Window Restoration Workshop:
• Hull Millworks in conjunction with WCHS & CWF
• Sat. Sept. 25, 2021 @ 9am
e) Design Review— Staff Authorized — Minor Alteration/Repairs
• 1401 Garfield (West Floral Heights) —window replacement (Landmark approved)
• 1400 Grant (West Floral Heights) — Plumbing/gas permit
f) Articles & Periodicals:
• Preservation (Nat'l Trust) Summer edition
VIII. Adjourn
Next regularly scheduled meeting September 28, 2021 - 12p.m. Meeting adjourned at
12:58 p.m.
Michele Derr, Chairperson Date
Page 5 of 5
Agenda Item No.6.a
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 8, 2021
PRESENT:
Jack Browne •Member
Michael Grassi •Member
Blake Haney •Member
Noros Martin • Member
Wayne Pharries •Alternate#2
Jeremy Woodward •Vice-Chair
Mark McBurneft •SAFB Liaison
Councilor Whiteley •Council Liaison
James McKechnie, Deputy City Attorney •City Staff
Paul Menzies, Assistant City Manager •
Terry Floyd, Development Services Director •
Fabian Medellin, Planner III ♦
Christal Ashcraft, Development Services Assistant ♦
Cedric Hu, Planning Technician •
Pat Hoffman, Property Management Administrator •
Rita Miller, Neighborhood Resources Manager ♦
ABSENT:
David Cook •Chairman
Anthony Inman •Member
Steve Lane •Member
Dan Leslie •Alternate#1
Cayce Wendeborn • Member
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman, Mr. Jeremy Woodward, at 2:00
p.m. Vice-Chairman Woodward proceeded to make the following comments:
a. This meeting is being televised live on Channel 1300. It will be replayed at
2:00 p.m. daily including Saturday and Sunday until the next live meeting is
aired which will be the second Wednesday of next month at 2:00 p.m.
b. Motions made by the Commission members include all staff
recommendations and developmental requirements listed in the staff report.
Any deviations will be discussed on a case-by-case basis and voted on
accordingly.
c. Applicants and citizens who wish to address the Commission or answer
questions from the Commission members are asked to please speak into the
microphone at the podium. This meeting is being taped and there is no
microphone to record statements made from the audience.
Page 1 of 6
Agenda Item No.6.b
Planning and Zoning 2 September 8, 2021
d. Commission members, when speaking please remember to press the button
to turn on your microphone.
e. Please silence all cell phones during the meeting. If it is necessary for you to
have a cell phone conversation during the meeting, please use the hallway
outside this room.
II. ROLL CALL
Vice-Chairman Woodward roll called Commission and staff members.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Vice-Chairman Woodward asked if there were any comments from the public. With
no response, Mr. Woodward closed public comments.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Noros Martin made a motion to adopt the August 11, 2021, minutes. Mr. Jack
Browne seconded the motion. The motion was passed unanimously.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
Case P 21-02 All American Addition — Preliminary Plat
Case P 21-03 Cherokee Industrial Park - Preliminary
Case P 21-04 Expressway Village, Section 29 — Preliminary Plat
Case P 21-05 High Point Village — Preliminary Plat
Case P 21-06 All American Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 Final Plat
Case P 21-07 Bellevue Addition, Lots 1-D, 1-E & 1-F, Block 5 Final Plat
Case P 21-12 Mustang Hill Addition, Lots 1-6, Block 1 Final Plat
Mr. Jack Browne made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Mr. Blake Haney
seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
VIII. REGULAR AGENDA
1. Case C 21-17 — 1802 Kemp Boulevard:
Request for a conditional use to allow for a convenient store in a
Commercial Corridor (CC) zoning district.
Applicant/Owner: Amin Hasnani
Location: 1803 Kemp Boulevard
Mr. Jack Browne made a motion to approve the case, Mr. Blake Haney seconded.
Mr. Fabian Medellin presented the case and stated staff met with, Mr. Amin
Hasnani in regard to occupying the vacant commercial structure located at the
intersection of Avenue H and Kemp Boulevard.
Page 2 of 6
Agenda Item No.6.b
Planning and Zoning 3 September 8, 2021
Mr. Medellin advised the site was formerly used as an office for a used car
dealership and most recently as an office for a monument sign company. The
applicant met with staff at a pre-development meeting where staff outlined the
steps required to allow for the conversion with one step being an approval of a
conditional use permit. The neighborhood to the east of the property is residential,
single family-2 district. To the north is a laundry mat, and to the west is offices and
other residential uses. To the south is Hayley Eye Clinic and a mix of more
residential uses.
Mr. Medellin stated during the pre-development meeting staff outlined the
necessary steps to bring the vacant structure into compliance for the conversion
which included things like upgrades and additional sinks as required by the Health
Department. Building permits for the modifications to the plumbing as well as any
electrical upgrades necessary for the coolers. Mr. Hasnani has advised he will not
be selling any fuel at this location. The zoning will also need to be brought into
compliance. Some of the non-conforming site elements that will need to be
addressed would be the striping of the parking lot, landscaping and fencing
separating the commercial use from the residential uses.
The zoning district for the subject property is a special purpose district known as
the Commercial Corridor (CC) that was created to allow for commercial uses along
the northern portions of Kemp Boulevard with some unique design guidelines to
mitigate some potential impacts to the adjacent residential districts and uses. One
of the unique features was the use of convenient stores with a conditional use
permit.
Staff notified 25 property owners within 200 ft. of the subject property and received
a total of 3 responses, all in favor of this proposal. After consideration of the
proposed use, staff recommends approval of this Conditional Use Permit request
for 1803 Kemp Blvd. to allow for a convenience store in a Commercial Corridor
(CC) zoning district with the following conditions:
1. Obtain all necessary permits and licenses in accordance with city
ordinances, adopted building code and health code regulations.
2. Bring all non-conforming site elements into compliance with current codes
to include parking lot striping, screening, and landscaping.
3. Any additional site improvements or developmental requirements as
required by the Health, Building, or Zoning Codes will be subject to the
site plan review process.
4. Comply with all special conditions unique to development in the
Commercial Corridor (CC) zoning district to include limitations of hours of
operation and signage.
5. Prior to initiating operations all developmental requirements, conditions,
permits and licensing shall be reviewed, approved, constructed and
inspected.
Page 3 of 6
Agenda Item No.6.b
Planning and Zoning 4 September 8, 2021
Vice-Chairman Woodward asked if the applicant was present and wished to make
a presentation. The applicant, was present and gave no statement. Vice-Chairman
Woodward asked if there were any other public comments. Vice-Chair Woodward
closed the case for public discussion and opened it up to the Commission. Vice-
Chairman Woodward asked if there were any other comments. With no further
comments, Vice-Chairman Woodward called for a vote. Motion passed
unanimously with a vote of 6-0.
2. Case C 21-18 — 1200 North 2nd Street:
Request for a conditional use to allow for the development of a
duplex in a Single-Family 2 Residential (SF-2) zoning district.
Applicant/Owner: Reunion Investments
Location: 1200 North 2nd Street
Mr. Jack Browne made a motion to approve the case, Mr. Wayne Pharries
seconded. Mr. Cedric Hu presented the case and stated representatives of
Reunion Investments met with staff for the proposed development of two duplexes
in a Single Family-2 (SF-2) zoning district, the first being located at 1200 North 2nd
Street. At that time, staff advised an approved conditional use permit approval
would be required to move forward with the proposed project.
The subject property is located north of downtown Wichita Falls, north of the
Wichita River, near the North Brook Avenue and North 2nd Street intersection. The
neighboring land to the west is vacant with a few residential properties to the east
across Brook Avenue.
The proposed duplex will be approximately 2,472 sf. and will be divided into two
residential units with two garages, giving each unit, a living area of approximately
782 sf. The curb cuts for the garages will be on Brook Avenue and North 2nd
Street. Mr. Hu stated the setbacks would be 25 ft. from the front, 12 ft. from the
rear, 8 ft. from the side interior and 18 ft.
Mr. Hu advised staff notified 21 property owners within 200 ft. and received 4
responses in total, all in favor of this request. It is noted there are no other
duplexes within the 200 ft. notification area, however, there is one duplex located
just outside the area. With all potential impacts taken into consideration, staff
recommended the approval of the proposed duplex at 1200 North 2nd Street subject
to the following conditions:
1. A total of 4 parking stalls be provided, meeting the design standards of
Section 6200 — Off Street Parking Regulations.
2. The conversion shall comply with all applicable building code regulations,
permitting, and inspections.
Vice-Chairman Woodward asked if the applicant was present and wished to make
a presentation. The applicant, was not present, however, Josh Hartmangruber with
Page 4 of 6
Agenda Item No.6.b
Planning and Zoning 5 September 8, 2021
Corlett, Probst & Boyd was present as Reunion Investments representative. Mr.
Hartmangruber stated the duplexes would be a beautiful addition to the
neighborhood. Vice-Chairman Woodward asked if there were any other public
comments. Vice-Chair Woodward closed the case for public discussion and
opened it up to the Commission. Vice-Chairman Woodward asked if there were any
other comments. With no further comments, Vice-Chairman Woodward called for a
vote. Motion passed unanimously with a vote of 6-0.
3. Case C 21-19 — 1202 North 2nd Street:
Request for a conditional use to allow for the development of a
duplex in a Single-Family 2 Residential (SF-2) zoning district.
Applicant/Owner: Reunion Investments
Location: 1202 North 2nd Street
Mr. Jack Browne made a motion to approve the case, Mr. Wayne Pharries
seconded. Mr. Cedric Hu presented the case and stated this case was the second
request by Reunion Investments for 1202 North 2nd Street, the adjacent property to
the previous case presented. This request will mimic the previous case as it is
proposing the development of two duplexes in a Single Family-2 (SF-2) zoning
district.
Mr. Hu again stated the subject property is located north of downtown Wichita Falls,
north of the Wichita River near the North Brook Avenue and North 2nd Street
intersection. The neighboring land to the west is vacant with a few residential
properties to the east across Brook Avenue.
Mr. Hu advised the floor plan for this duplex would be a little larger, with
approximately 1,928 sf., and will be divided into two residential units with two
garages, giving a living area of each unit approximately 720 sf. The curb cut for the
two garages will be on North 2nd Street. Mr. Hu stated the requirements for all
setbacks would be met with 25 ft. from the front, 53 ft. from the rear, 7 ft. from the
side interior and 7 ft.
Mr. Hu stated staff notified 25 property owners within 200 ft. and received 4
responses in total, all in favor of this request. It is noted there are no other
duplexes within the 200 ft. notification area, however, there is the one duplex
located close outside the area as previously mentioned. With all potential impacts
taken into consideration, staff recommended the approval of the proposed duplex
at 1202 North 2nd Street subject to the following conditions:
1 . A total of 4 parking stalls be provided meeting the design standards of
Section 6200 — Off Street Parking Regulations.
2. The conversion shall comply with all applicable building code regulations,
permitting, and inspections.
Page 5 of 6
Agenda Item No.6.b
Planning and Zoning 6 September 8, 2021
Vice-Chairman Woodward asked if Mr. Hartmangruber, representative for Reunion
Investments would like to make any comments. Mr. Hartmangruber declined. Vice-
Chairman Woodward asked if there were any other public comments. Vice-Chair
Woodward closed the case for public discussion and opened it up to the
Commission. Vice-Chairman Woodward asked if there were any other comments.
With no further comments, Vice-Chairman Woodward called for a vote. Motion
passed unanimously with a vote of 6-0.
IX. OTHER BUSINESS
Updates:
R 21-06: 522 6th Street
Mr. Medellin gave a brief update to the Commission and stated the rezone
recommended for approval to the City Council had passed on September 7th, 2021.
Central Wichita Falls Neighborhood Engagement Meeting
Mr. Medellin stated the first meeting would be held Saturday, September 11th at
Floral Heights United Methodist Church located at 2214 10th Street. Three different
meeting times will be conducted to meet the various needs of citizens that wish to
participate. The first meeting will begin at 9 a.m., the next at 11 a.m. and the last for
that day at 2 p.m.
X. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 2:17 p.m.
r I /
N/ l
David C ok, Chairman Date
I /713/...)0,.)_1
T loyd, Director of Development Services Date
Page 6 of 6
Agenda Item No.6.b
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Conduct a public hearing and take action on an ordinance annexing
+/- 32.93 acres of land out of Blocks 12 and 13, Denton County
School Land, League 2, A-57, Wichita County, Texas, located at
5030 Gregg Road, at the request of the property owner; accepting
the Trophy Park Subdivision, Section 5 Servicing Plan Agreement for
said tract under authority of Texas Local Government Code Chapter
43; Subchapter C-3 — authority of municipalities to annex an area on
the request of owners; and designating the property zoning and Land
Use Plan classification as Single-Family 2 (SF-2) and Low Density
Residential.
INITIATING DEPT: Development Services/Planning Division
STRATEGIC GOAL: Accelerate Economic Growth
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Revitalize Depressed and Declining Neighborhoods
COMMENTARY:
• September - October 2021 — Coordination with landowner, engineer and City
development review team regarding steps forward for petitioned annexation.
• September 8, 2021 — Staff met with landowner and engineer regarding
requirements for voluntary annexation of property.
• September 17, 2021 - Notarized petition for annexation and processing fee
submitted.
• September 17, 2021 - Draft annexation service plan distributed to department
d i rectors
• October 8, 2021 — Departmental response deadline for revisions to the draft
Annexation Service Plan; revisions for various municipal services incorporated.
• October 15, 2021 — Planning & Zoning Commission conducts public hearing;
recommends City Council zone to Single-Family 2 if annexed into city limits.
• October 21, 2021 - Annexation service plan agreement sent to
landowner/engineer.
• October 21 , 2021 — Written notice of proposed annexation mailed to school
districts, public entities and special districts in the area proposed for annexation.
• October 21, 2021- Property for annexation posted with notice for public hearing.
• October 21, 2021 - Notice of City Council public hearing published in TRN and
posted on City's website in accordance with state statutes.
• November 2, 2021 —City Council conducts public hearing and considers ordinance
for petitioned annexation.
City staff received a voluntary petition for annexation from Earth Homes, Inc. (owner
Randy Wachsman) of approximately 32.95 acres at 5030 Gregg Road, situated just
PAGE 1 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
southwest of Memorial Stadium. This voluntary annexation would annex the next section
of the Trophy Park Subdivision — Section 5. Previous sections were voluntarily annexed
over the past few years.
City departments have been notified of this annexation request and were asked to
respond with their respective service abilities. No objections from city departments were
received regarding the Trophy Park Subdivision, Section 5 Service Plan.
If the voluntary petitioned annexation is approved, it would expand the City's corporate
limits. Property annexed into the City is automatically zoned as Single-Family-1 (SF-1),
the most restrictive zoning designation. The tract will be utilized for residential home
building and uses more closely aligned with a Single-Family 2 (SF-2) zoning designation
and a Land Use Plan classification of Low Density Residential. These zoning designations
are consistent with the previously annexed sections of the Trophy Park Subdivision.
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended a zoning designation of SF-2 and
Land Use Plan (LUP) classification of Low Density Residential at their October 15, 2021
meeting. The landowner has preliminarily platted the property proposed for development.
Staff also recommends approval of this ordinance annexing the land tract referenced as
5030 Gregg Road, associated zoning designation of SF-2 and LUP classification of Low
Density Residential.
❑ Assistant City Manager ® Development Services Director
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Attachment A — Location Map; Attachment B — Trophy
Park, Section 5 Service Plan Agreement; Ordinance; Exhibit 'A' — Field Notes; Exhibit 'B'
— Requested Annexation Area Map; Exhibit 'C' —Zoning Map; and Exhibit `D' — Land Use
Map
® Budget Office Review:
® City Attorney Review:
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 2 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
ATTACHMENT A
ti-� SC1lJTHLw'E5T_�14WY ` .."¢r 11 i
ill
,, Memorial
Stadium
! -ce. 51-I. LACILN=
LI Il
' gar �, .
1..
wriCkC, .Y1 f f
/ NATCHEZ TRCE-
5 L F I t ititik. W DUB LARGIN LN
.10*-411-7--; *t. 1. \\\\
� IVAN DORN DR
' ' OLI1fIA,LS GLFS-'rikeiOAKMONT-DR 'QI_rraPlc DID pip
z
`'
LANGFORD:LH`
[Trophy Park Subdivision (Sec.5) i I i
b
I;^I CD
. 0 F - IL_ 1, 1
Wichita County -. :
•
rr.
1
■
I : IIiIII , ' ,
R35 S CREep
Feet
_., ': 6 356 06 105 14C0 1.750
. Acres
Trophy Park Subdivision (Sec. 5)
Wichita County Legend
Location Map .._..
L .f City Limits-Wichita Falls
C.TY Of Y/0-171A F.A.LS.a'LANN94 P'.ISF�W
NO FtiA66,1"..Eb 6T GeGu Flu
px* ouoauceo,r s.s,M. sv, M Track for Petitioned A.nn exatian
PAGE 3 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
ATTACHMENT B
..:114144110cP 4
if;f
TEXAS
City of Wichita Falls
ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN
AGREEMENT
TROPHY PARK SUBDIVISION
Section 5
September 2021
PAGE 4 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
INTRODUCTION
On September 17, 2021 R.J. Wachsman, President, of Earth Homes, Inc. submitted a
petition for annexation of a 32.93-acre tract of land situated in Wichita County referenced
as a Blocks 12 & 13, Denton County School Land, League 2, A-57; commonly referenced
as the proposed Trophy Park Subdivision, Section 5 west of Gregg Road.
Pursuant to Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code, the City of Wichita Falls is
coordinating with each department and put together the Trophy Park Subdivision Section
5 — Service Plan Agreement for future delivery of municipal services to an area that may
be annexed by the City of Wichita Falls, at the request of the landowner, at a future
consideration date by City Council at a public hearing.
The following municipal service agreement outlines each service the municipality (City of
Wichita Falls) will provide either on the effective date of the owner-requested (owner
referenced as Earth Homes, Inc.) annexation adoption or to become effective at such
time as outlined in a schedule of service. Future municipal services outlined in this
agreement are for a land tract subject to petitioned annexation by the City of Wichita Falls,
Texas as considered by the governing body on November 2, 2021, and
referenced in Attachment A — General Vicinity Map. The City of Wichita Falls is not
required to provide services not included in this petitioned annexation municipal services
agreement.
PAGE 5 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
TROPHY PARK SUBDIVISION (SECTION 5)
PETITIONED ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
Police
This area will be served using the same standards for response, together with
investigative services as provided to other areas of the City.
Fire
This area will be served using the same operational standards for response, investigation
and code compliance as provided to other areas of the city.
Parks
1. Open park areas for picnicking will be available to any future residents of the
annexed area on the same basis as residents presently residing within the City
limits.
2. Services provided will be identical to those provided to persons living in other areas
of the City.
Engineering Services
Engineering services will be limited to the review of development plans, issuance of
permits as required in the development phase, and the inspection of the installation of
water and sanitary sewer mains, storm sewers, and the paving of streets and alleys.
Library
Library services identical to those services to persons living in other areas of the City will
be provided to the annexation area.
Maintenance of Streets and Roads
Maintenance of streets and roads shall be on a level comparable to that provided for other
areas of the City with similar roads, equivalent population densities, degrees and nature
of development, traffic patterns, and other factors influencing street maintenance.
PAGE 6 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Traffic Services
Dependent on development demands, the City deems it necessary based on the Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards from the U.S. Federal Highway
Administration for street lights, pavement markings, traffic signals, traffic signs, including
street name, warning, and regulatory signs, will be installed, and maintained by the City
of Wichita Falls Traffic Department. In addition, traffic counts and other related studies
will follow the same procedures and guidelines practiced within the City.
Solid Waste Collection
1. For any future residential development that may occur in the area, the City will
supply curbside automated service by extending our current automated collection
service routing. The collection of solid waste from the individual properties and
containers shall be made in accordance with usual department scheduling and
rates.
2. Commercial solid waste collection services will be provided to any business
located in the annexed area under the same rate, procedures and regulations as
presently provided for any business customer within the City, upon request.
3. The use of the City's solid waste collection facilities and transfer station(s) will be
available to any future residents of the newly annexed area, and on the same basis
as those residents living within the City limits.
4. The City is the sole provider of residential and commercial solid waste collection
and disposal.
Schedule of Timing for Solid Waste Collection and Transfer Station Services
The property will be served at the same rate as available to other City residential
customers for refuse collection and transfer station services upon completion of all final
platting requirements.
Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities
Maintenance
1. Maintenance of water facilities will include those facilities installed by the City or
installed according to City standards and specifications.
2. Sanitary Sewer will be in accordance with individual application of septic systems
where applicable, which shall be the responsibility of the property owner or tenant.
The City will maintain facilities installed by the City or installed according to City
standards and specifications.
PAGE 7 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Development
1. Additional extensions of a water system shall be at the expense of the "applicant"
as per Chapter 106, Article VI and the Comprehensive Subdivision Ordinance of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Wichita Falls.
2. Sanitary sewer extensions shall be at the expense of the "applicant" in accordance
with Chapter 106, Article VI and the Comprehensive Subdivision Ordinance of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Wichita Falls.
Schedule of Timing for Provision of Water and Sanitary Sewer Service
The property is served by City Water and Sanitary Sewer services and may be connected
to these utilities upon completion of all final platting requirements.
Planning and Zoning Services
1. Planning and zoning services will be provided immediately upon annexation. In
addition to the protection of property values through the enforcement of zoning and
subdivision regulation, other services including the processing of applications for
zoning change and site plan review will be provided by existing City staff.
2. Rezoning of properties will be handled in accordance with existing City procedures.
Existing use of properties in conflict with permitted uses shall be deemed
nonconforming, and shall continue to operate in accordance with Section 6100 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Building Inspection Services
Inspection services, including the review of building plans, the issuance of permits and
the inspection of all buildings, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical work to ensure
compliance with City codes and ordinances, will be provided by Building Inspection
personnel.
Environmental Health and Code Enforcement Services
1. Complaints of ordinance violation or other code violations within the area will be
answered and investigated by existing personnel.
2. Animal control services will be provided to those areas within the annexed area
using existing personnel and equipment.
3. Vector control services will be provided to those areas within the annexed area
using existing personnel and equipment.
PAGE 8 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Miscellaneous Services
General municipal administration and administrative services of the City will be available
to the annexed area beginning with the effective date of the annexation ordinance.
CITY of WICHITA FALLS
By:
Darron Leiker
City Manager
EARTH HOMES, INC.
By:
R.J. Wachsman
President, Earth Homes, Inc.
CITY of WICHITA FALLS
APPROVED as to FORM: ATTEST:
Kinley Hegglund Marie Balthrop
City Attorney City Clerk
PAGE 9 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Ordinance No.
Ordinance annexing +/- 32.93 acres of land out of Blocks 12 and 13, Denton
County School Land, League 2, A-57, Wichita County, Texas, located at
5030 Gregg Road at the request of the property owner; accepting the
Trophy Park Subdivision, Section 5 Servicing Plan Agreement for said tract
under authority of Texas Local Government Code Chapter 43; Subchapter
C-3 — authority of municipalities to annex an area on the request of owners;
and designating the property zoning and Land Use Plan classification as
Single-Family 2 (SF-2) and Low Density Residential.
WHEREAS, the Planning Division received a request for petitioned annexation on
September 17, 2021; and,
WHEREAS, the governing body, Wichita Falls City Council, heard arguments for
and against the petition on November 2, 2021 and granted the petition for annexation by
area landowners; and,
WHEREAS, City departments have reviewed such annexation request and find
that such annexation would not burden City resources in providing service(s); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that such annexation is in the public
interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1. A tract of land being 32.93 acres described in Field Notes herein included
as Exhibit "A" and as shown on the map included as Exhibit "B", is hereby annexed into
the City of Wichita Falls.
2. The annexation will not expand the City of Wichita Falls Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction (ETJ) area.
3. The City Council further directs the City Clerk to file a certified and true copy
of this ordinance together with a copy or duplicate of the petition for annexation in the
office of the Wichita County Clerk, Wichita County after its passage as required by law.
4. Blocks 12 and 13, Denton County School Land, League 2, A-57, Wichita
County, Texas, as depicted on the attached map incorporated in this ordinance
as Exhibit "C", is hereby zoned for Single-Family 2 uses.
5. The area on the Land Use Map, as depicted on the attached map
incorporated in this ordinance as Exhibit"D" is hereby classified for Low Density
Residential uses.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021
PAGE 10 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 11 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Exhibit `A'
Field Notes
A 32.93 ACRE TRACT OUT OF A TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AND
RECORDED IN VOLUME 2609, PAGE 840, WICHITA COUNTY DEED RECORDS,
WICHITA COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PORTION OF BLOCKS 12 & 13, DENTON
COUNTY SCHOOL LAND, LEAGUE 2, ABSTRACT NO. 57, WICHITA COUNTY,
TEXAS AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 11?" IRON ROD AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18,
BLOCK 1, TROPHY PARK SECTION 4 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 28, PAGES
1220-1221, WICHITA COUNTY PLAT RECORDS;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF TROPHY PARK SECTION 4, SOUTH
19`20'39" WEST 1064.05 FEET TO A 112" IRON ROD FOR THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 17, BLOCK 8, OF SAID TROPHY PARK SECTION 4;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF TROPHY PARK SECTION
4 AS FOLLOWS:
SOUTH 70'24'58' EAST 185.28 TO A 1/2" IRON ROD;
SOUTH 18'29'11" WEST 27,99 FEET TO Al/2" IRON ROD;
SOUTH 70°24'58" EAST 259.13 FEET TO A 1/2" IRON ROD;
SOUTH 84'31'07" EAST 73.42 FEET TO A 112" IRON ROD;
NORTH 81°12'31' EAST 69.04 FEET TO A 1/2" IRON ROD;
NORTH 8°47'25"' EAST 64.90 FEET TO A '12" IRON ROD:
NORTH 56°03'33" EAST 216.95 FEE I I 0 A 112 IF-- ON ROD FOR THE MOST
SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TROP7 IY PARK SECTION 4 AND
THE MOST SOUTHERLY SOUTHWES1 COI- NI R 01 TROPHY PARK SECTION 3
AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 27, PAGES 1; i ' : ;;+ :'w CI IITA COUNTY PLAT
RECORDS.
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TROPHY PARK SECTION
3, NORTH 56'02'37" EAST 440.00 FEET TO 1/2" IRON ROD FOR NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 3, TROPHY PARK SECTION 2 AS RECORDED IN
VOLUME 27, PAGES 1183-1184, WICHITA COUNTY PLAT RECORDS;
PAGE 12 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Exhibit `A'
Field Notes Continued
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, SOUTH 33°57'23' EAST 178.55
FEET TO 1/2" IRON ROD IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TROPHY PARK
LANE AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 27, PAGES 1183-1154, WICHITA COUNTY PLAT
RECORDS;
THENCE SOUTH 56°02'37" WEST 662.75 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING
TI 1E BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT;
THENCE ALONG THE SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00
FEET, AN ARC LENGTH. OF 373.713 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH
82°48'49" WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 360.33' FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 70a24'58" WEST 645.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING
THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT;
THENCE ALONG THE SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 340_00
FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 115.66 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH
80'09'40' WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 115.10' FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 89°54'23" WEST 715.62 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST
BOUNDARY LINE OF THE BRAD T. BURNS TRACT OF LAND AS RECORDED IN
VOLUME 2918, PAGE 600, WICHITA COUNTY DEED RECORDS;
THENCE ALONG THE SAID EAS I LINL 01- I I IE BRAD T. BURNS TRACT, NORTH
00°42'4 " EAST 768,78 FEET TO A ;/ " IRON ROD IN THE SOUTH LINE OF HILL &
HILL HEIGHTS, SECTION .3. UNI I '' AS I,LCODED IN VOLUME 28, PAGES 61-62,
WICHITA COUNTY PI AT RECORDS
THENCE ALONG THE SAID SOUT I LINE OF I ".ILL & HILL I LEIG1 iTS, SECTION 3,
UNIT .1 AP FOLLOWS:
NORTI 188-53'18" EAST 641.51 FEET TO A 112" IRON ROD;
NORTH O13 O5'37n EAST 337.62 FEET TO A 1/2" IRON ROD;
SOUT—I 89`28'39' EAST 789.48 FEET TO A 1/2" IRON ROD IN THE SOUTH LINE OF
HIE I & HII L HEIGHTS, SECTION 1, UNIT 6 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 27, PAGES
'1 122-1 123, OF THE WICHITA COUNTY PLAT RECORDS TO THE PLACE OF
BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 32.93 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PAGE 13 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Exhibit `B'
Requested Annexation Area Map
LINE DATA TABLE N
LENT HEAR NCi DISTANCE
.1 SOUTH 70.24'S8'EAST• 185.28
„2 SOUTH_f3'2sii Q S1 27 99'' ; '
.3 SOUTH 70'24'SS'EAST 258.13' N s:,-',`:
..4 5.OJTI I Ff4'31'O7 EAST 73A .. .
UnRTH1'17'31'EAST 6411a' -.' t,.. t E
.
...f NOR rH SfreiT2S'EAST W_97' �`�"'=`" ,*,,,
NORTH S6703 33'EAST 216.95'
La NORTH 56'02'37'EAST &tall' PLACE OF
i3 SOJrH 33'57'23'EAST 17855' BEGINNING
LID NORTH r.e..V:37'E4 T 337.52' S 89'28S9'E 789,48
MT.1 ,.. . , .;i.1_, ., _....
. .. S
SFCTION 1,I's?`I 1 -11+CPRY Pape
aAKrvlora r CR
'+- C` e 77 PP R -.,
N 88'53'18"E T9:FAY rAFa ri. P.H
CITY LIMIT (IN) :.1.5i' - '
'. I OLYI++PICDR
in
3T
PI QPQ ED ,] q:,H
w ANNEXATION ION g t L 21,1: a ma- :..
' t{32.93 ACHES,ii.11 ` TROPHY PAl1:-TA
w 1
N89'5423'W715.02' ,1. 44
Ldt.5
t%094v 7=18'2925' s
9
t gCL3.-4P,ON:9'1()'w
O' CL-115.10' R r7.GP I
D=53'32'25' I
C:.13-S82`.1 8'49"'04'
CL._ .642.2,3'
GRAFI1IC SCALE
21)0 J 1C-J 8,..10
' ,L#f -J t l I I .1 �._1_1_I_.. _A El
'Pi
L= � SOUTHWEST Mr( (IN?=SETT`}
i*o
IndT= 40tif R
4';'/f" " "'°'"p0
ANNEXATION EXHIBIT
Trip
411 iI+n. mil:tr..In11 'FIEF MEMORIAL
++11'00. - iwn�xiim STAM M 32.93 ACRE TRACT Ian Oh H LUL KS 12 . 13,
P� wlaanu11U DENTON COUNTY SCHOOL LAND, LEAGUE 2,A-57
11111
mNi.^.+lwe.:t Me�i WICHITA COUNTY, TEXAS
LAN§FORD LN
f
f! ` r r[GGS & ATHEWS C.
AREA OF I , W� " , +_.
. AT.. Consulting Engine s }
INTEREST �,L,- ` -^ 1„. *14 ;; 2 BA,A)k .AVR P1. (910�7664136
.. 1 T G'I `., IiatTT.rtA 1h1d1%TX 763�D] nu(940)766-2.313
I f' 1�:r..,..--: TEXAS REGISTERED EiC WGFIRMF434
LOCATION MAP '> 3 XILKEISTEaR,EID S4TAViaYI]f{?FIRM 10613203
SCALE; 1'=20U'
PAGE 14 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Exhibit 'C'
Requested Zoning Map
Siggle Family
II
kirk,
Single Family 1 Commar!
- _
\ , Single Family - --------„-----..7.---.-.-------.--W
, 2
___--
, 44
.2%
,- 'V a?
__—sta0 \ t,
NTIc.-F7- C=
'IS C 11 L ARGI\ Lts
.cf:„LoN 1 •ri6. .t- •• — ' /,r .... L L.,„,
-----,3, . :a ..L., D7:
1F.
%,..,
• °,'- '''
-.....
,..7-DR III
.6.40 wa.1......i.....7
1
CI YUPIC DR
i/ /dir ,7
I
/
0 I 1 1
1,,, 7 ri;:opliAl ,
,, / :„... :„. :/......, „72
,..:c...,, ...,' —'—LANGFORD LN
...
• i •2.7--------.'56"\- // .,
lir
-,/ I id-' 1 II ' -1
Proposed zone.of n, •Ill --I
E 1
Single Family 2
C3.
c-, 1
• II
01111
'4111
i I .
1..
I
I
1 , „ I „ I i 1 .I l—R0 SS CHt L ,
0 245 5.10 1,25.2.rest
R 21-07
CL-m- Zoninci Bow-Kier/ Zoning
Trophy Park Subdivision (Sec. 5) E- -
Single Parnity t...„),.. ..,.--..-4 Zoips Ai ea
Zoning Map
Parcels Single Fanrily 2
ary or AICKS•Althu..8 Puviw r+ 1 rii404
MAP NICDUCE0 BY C-aant I...
= GCrIella I ecinirnortial
um,..-..4.1...11 .e.I..{014rItiel....I Subioct Properties
City Li rn its
„. , , .._.,......
e •
VViGhila Falls
PAGE 15 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
Exhibit `D'
Requested Land Use Map
, -
II 4, Conunrrcial
•#* Low Density Residential .r,iyh111
oe1ety
ResWanaiel
I L:AOI IN I 10:10
re ; Open
0 ' Spaces
rt•,nX,.E r OD y LT,2;.4f V
\ ,.44C3 -`� . ,.... . . . - . . . . 1
I
b^#ATCHEZ°7R:E L.
411 c B DUB LARGIN
t.ON-7 c
A -�( —VAN DORN 17R 1V‘0
i
— DR-DR i
�i CIF!INN APE WAN .//J! .. . . I w--'"77/F Or
I
/ ..^I•Y'4iVIG OR �
( ,...},,,7% 1
i1 ir
, ,
r ti� .'.r •• LANGFt RD IN
..,.-1L _ V . ',4 _ .
Proposed Land LLse o'_
to Low Density Residential c,.O . . . . .Ld
w
f.7 "
1
r
i 1
i
I
1 i i I I I 1 4 L
0 �a5 L70 1 40 fee: RO55 CREEK /
R 21-07
Trophy Park Subdivision (Sec. 5) Legend
Land Use Map m sub,ect Properties
arr or wei•SAFN AS Pm,/r,.; 1+n lOw i
MAP NICDUCE0BY. nt I... J,
tacit N;.r.1:.:Il ta: yflel....I Pri;ll{r.;ell Lam^id USE..
Land Use Plan Boundary City Limits
Parcei3 L 1 r'+''hi,...1=i
PAGE 16 OF 16 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Section 6a of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee
schedule applied to Health Department operations; providing for
severability; providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and
providing an effective date.
INITIATING DEPT: Health
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently deliver city services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice effective governance
COMMENTARY: Every year during the budgeting process, the Health District reviews
the fees for each Division. This year the only changes requested are in the Animal
Services Division. The requested fee changes are minor and are intended to correct
issues and situations, which have occurred over the past year. The changes/additions
are as follows:
(4) Impound —Animal that is not spayed or neutered.
Added 2nd impound in any 36-month period $90. Animal Services will transport
the animal to the vet of choice for spay or neuter.
This change was made because when we passed the ordinance to require spay and
neuter on the first impoundment we did not anticipate we would have individuals who
would not follow through. Individuals are required to prepay for the procedure and then
provide proof of spay or neuter at a later date. We now have dogs being impounded for
the second time who have not been altered. By charging a higher fee and requiring that
we deliver the animal to the vet, we can ensure compliance with the ordinance.
(4) Impound - added
Small Animal (birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, snakes, hamsters, fish etc.) $10.00
This is a new fee. Over the past year when one of these type animals were impounded
we did not have this fee available to us which meant we had to charge an impound fee
for one of the other animal categories. In some instances, the individual would simply wait
for the animal to go up for adoption and adopt their own animal. The addition of this fee
will allow us to charge the appropriate fee for the appropriate service.
(5) Daily Boarding fee: Added
Small Animal (birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, snakes, hamsters, fish etc.) $10.00
PAGE 1 OF 6 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.A
This is a new fee. Over the past year when one of these type animals were impounded
we did not have this fee available to us which meant we had to charge an impound fee
for one of the other animal categories. In some instances, the individual would simply wait
for the animal to go up for adoption and adopt their own animal. The addition of this fee
will allow us to charge the appropriate fee for the appropriate service.
(7) Animal Surrender fee. We did not change any fees in this section only added
language to clarify that if the mother was surrendered with a litter that the mother would
be charged separately from the litter.
(10) Adoption Fees
Fowl we want to reduce the fee for$5 to $3 this is dues to the number of chickens
we have in the shelter each year and it is often hard to get them adopted because they
can be purchased cheaper.
The above proposed changes in the fees will create an additional $470 in revenue for the
21/22 fiscal year.
® Director of Health Department
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 2 OF 6 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.A
Ordinance No.
Ordinance amending Section 6a of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee
schedule applied to Health Department operations; providing for
severability; providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and
providing an effective date
WHEREAS, City Staff has studied the cost of providing the services and enforcing
the regulatory schemes which are currently not being covered by the existing fees; and,
WHEREAS, after receiving and reviewing the aforementioned costs, the City
Council finds that the fees established herein do not exceed the amount reasonably
necessary to provide the services and administer and enforce the regulatory programs to
which they are related; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the fines, fees, and rates described herein
are necessary to provide for the services and regulated programs and further finds that
any discrimination established against non-residents in fee amounts does not provide
funds that exceed the taxpayer-funded amount of the described programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1. The following schedule of fees and charges of Section 6a of Ordinance No. 49-
2021 shall be amended and adopted for all Health Department operations, which are
authorized to create or enforce such fees by state or federal law or by the Code of
Ordinances:
6. Health
6a. Animal Services
(1) Licenses:
• Spayed or neutered Animal:
o One-year: $10.00
o Two-year: $15.00
o Three-year: $20.00
• Animal that is not spayed or neutered:
o One-year: $30.00
o Two-year: $60.00
o Three-year: $90.00
o Dangerous Animal
o One-year: $400.00
• Duplicate city tag: $7.00
(2) Annual permits:
• Commercial:
PAGE 3 OF 6 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.A
• Fowl, Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Ferret: $150.00
o Grooming Shop: $150.00
o Kennel: $125.00
o Performing Animal, Petting Zoo, Circus: $150.00
o Pet Store: $150.00
o Private Animal Shelter: $150.00
o Stable, Riding School: $150.00
o Permit Reapplication Fee: $50.00
o Permit Reinspection Fee: $25.00
• Residential:
o Fowl: $30.00
o Livestock: $75.00
o Livestock with identification: $55.00
o Pet Fancier: $50.00
o Project Animal: $20.00
o Rabbit: $25.00
o Swine: $45.00
o Permit Reapplication Fee: $25.00
o Permit Reinspection Fee: $25.00
(3) Special permits:
• Feral Cat Colony: $10.00
• Litter: $100.00 per litter
• Sellers: $250.00 per litter
• Stud: $100.00 per breeding
(4) Impound fees:
• Spayed or neutered Animal.
O 1st impound: $45.00
O 2nd impound in any 36-month period: $80.00
O 3rd impound in any 36-month period: $105.00
O 4th impound in any 36-month period: $130.00 + $25.00 for
each additional impound
• Animal that is not spayed or neutered.
O 1st impound: $50.00
O 2nd impound in any 36-month period: $90.00 ASC will
transport to veterinarian for spay/neuter
Pcnalty for not spaying or ncutcring: $50.00, + Plus impound
fcc.
• Small Animal (birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, snakes, hamsters, fish,
etc.) impound: $10.00
• Small livestock.
o Impound Fee: $65.00
• Large livestock.
o Impound Fee: $125.00
(5) Daily boarding fees:
PAGE 4 OF 6 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.A
• Small Animal (birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, snakes, hamsters, fish,
etc.): $5.00
• Animal: $10.00
• Small livestock: $20.00
• Large livestock: $25.00
(6) Quarantine fees:
Quarantine Vaccinations $20
• Ten-day quarantine fee (to be paid at beginning of quarantine):
(a) Initial quarantine $170.00
(b) 2nd quarantine of same animal ..... $220.00
(c) 3rd quarantine of same animal ..... $320.00
(d) 4th quarantine of same animal $420.00
(e) Any subsequent quarantine: $420 00 + $100.00 for each
additional quarantine.
• Daily boarding fee after 10-day quarantine: $25.00 per day
• Rabies testing in lieu of quarantine: $50.00
(7) Animal surrender fee payable by owner:
• Single animal: $30.00
• Litter less than 4 months old - three or less (Mom charged as
single animal): $40.00
• Litter less than 4 months old - four or more (Mom charged as
single animal): $60.00
• Animal Pickup Fee: $15.00 (in addition to surrender fee)
(8) Deceased animal removal fee:
• Animal weighing 50 lbs or less: $20.00
• Animal weighing greater than 50 Ibs: $30.00
(9) Trapping:
• Small trap deposit: $60.00
• Large trap deposit: $155.00
• Trapping and animal removal fee: $35.00 for 5 days, and $10.00 for
every day thereafter.
• Animal removal fee - private trap:
Animal weighing 50 lbs. or less: $20.00
Animal weighing 50 lbs. or more: $30.00
(10) Adoption fees:
• Dog Adoption Fee: $40.00
• Cat Adoption Fee: $40.00
• Transport Fee to Veterinarian out of City limits: $25.00
• Small Animal: (birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, snakes, hamsters, fish,
etc.) $10.00
• Fowl: $53.00
• Small Livestock: (goats, sheep, pigs): .... $40.00
• Large Livestock (Horses, donkeys and cows): $75.00
(11) Miscellaneous fees:
• Microchipping: $10.00
PAGE 5 OF 6 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.A
• Rabies voucher: $12.00
• Late Fee Permit: $25.00
• Late Fee License: $10.00
• The health district is hereby authorized to pass along the cost of
any veterinary services incurred for the care of an animal to that
animal's owner, possessor, or harborer.
(Ord. No. 67-2011, § 1, 11-15-2011; Ord. No. 58-2012, § 1, 9-18-2012)
2. The fee schedule established by this ordinance shall be made available to the
public through the Office of the City Clerk, and be published online in such a manner as
to be available to the public.
3. Should any section or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the
ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid.
4. To the extent that the Code of Ordinances establishes the existence of a fee,
this ordinance will govern the amount of that fee, but this ordinance shall not be codified.
5. This ordinance shall take effect December 2, 2021 and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of November 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 6 OF 6 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.A
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Section 5 of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee
schedule applied to Fire Department operations; providing for
severability; providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and
providing an effective date.
INITIATING DEPT: Fire
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice effective governance
COMMENTARY: The attached amendment to the previously approved fee schedule is
presented to correct a typographical error in the calculated "new fire alarm system" and
"new fire sprinkler system" fees, changing the fee to $25.00 per 5,000 square feet from
the previous $25.00 per square foot.
® Fire Chief
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.B
Ordinance No.
Ordinance amending Section 5 of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee
schedule applied to Fire Department operations; providing for
severability; providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and
providing an effective date
WHEREAS, City Staff has studied the cost of providing the services and enforcing
the regulatory schemes which are currently not being covered by the existing fees; and,
WHEREAS, after receiving and reviewing the aforementioned costs, the City
Council finds that the fees established herein do not exceed the amount reasonably
necessary to provide the services and administer and enforce the regulatory programs to
which they are related; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the fines, fees, and rates described herein
are necessary to provide for the services and regulated programs and further finds that
any discrimination established against non-residents in fee amounts does not provide
funds that exceed the taxpayer-funded amount of the described programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1. The following schedule of fees and charges of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 49-
2021 shall be amended and adopted for all Fire Department operations, which are
authorized to create or enforce such fees by state or federal law or by the Code of
Ordinances:
5. Fire
5a.-1 Miscellaneous Fire Department Fees:
(1) The following fees shall be assessed and collected for the use or presence
of equipment and supplies in fire department responses to open burning
permit supervision, vehicle fires and accidents, hazardous material spills
and releases, and low water crossing rescues and rescue attempts:
• For each response to an incident scene involving at least one fire
apparatus (engine, truck, rescue/Hazmat, manpower squad,
command vehicle, mini-pumper): $450.00 per day, with a one-day
minimum;
• The actual cost of any consumable used or partly used for the mitigation
of any hazardous materials spill or release; and
• The actual cost of repairing or replacing any nonconsumable item
damaged during attempts to mitigate an incident covered under this
section.
PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.B
• If a vehicle that is the subject of a response is covered by an automobile
insurance policy, the occupants of said vehicle will not be billed in
accordance with this section for the response, and the responsible
vehicle's insurance company will instead be billed for that response.
(Ord. No. 53-2010, § 1, 9-21-2010; Ord. No. 69-2011, § 2, 12-6-2011)
L2) Pyrotechnic display permit $100.00; plus $50.00 per hour for standby fire
crew with 2-hour minimum
(1) Bonfire Standby ... $50.00 per hour with 2-hour minimum
(4) Other fire department permits $50.00
(Ord. No. 69-2011, § 2, 12-6-2011)
5a.-2 General Fire Inspection ... $30.00 per year for any General Business that does not
fall into one of the following categories:
(1) State-Licensed Healthcare Facility ... $5.00 per bed, per year
(Hospitals, Nursing and Assisted Living Facilities, Rehab Hospitals)
(2) Education Campuses (Private and Public) ... $35.00 per campus, per year
(Elementary, Middle, High Schools, Technical/Career Centers)
(3) Apartment Complexes ... $35.00 per building, plus $20.00 per floor, per
year
(Residential Apartments [Single and Multi-Story])
(4) Hotel/Motel ... $75.00 per floor, per year
(5) Hazardous Material Occupancy ... $150.00 per year
(6) Outside of city limits inspections ... $45.00 per hour with 1-hour minimum
including follow-up inspections.
(7) Compliance Failure Penalty ... $25.00 after second failed inspection;
$50.00 after third failed inspection; $100 after fourth failed inspection.
5a.-3 New and Updated Fire Alarms and Sprinkler Systems
(1) Fire Sprinkler Systems
a. New fire sprinkler systems ... $125.00 plus $25.00 per 5,000 square
feet to a maximum of$500.00
b. Alterations/Repairs ... $40.00 for up to 50 heads; $80.00 for 51-100
heads; $125 for 100+ heads
c. Subsequent inspections ... $50.00
(2) Fire Alarm Systems
a. New fire alarm system ... $75.00 plus $25.00 per 5,000 square feet to
a maximum of$450
PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.B
b. Alterations/Repairs ... $40.00 per alarm panel swap; $40.00 for up to
25 devices; $80.00 for 26-40 devices; New Alarm System rate for 41+
devices
c. Subsequent inspections ... $50.00
2. The fee schedule established by this ordinance shall be made available to the
public through the Office of the City Clerk, and be published online in such a manner as
to be available to the public.
3. Should any section or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the
ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid.
4. To the extent that the Code of Ordinances establishes the existence of a fee,
this ordinance will govern the amount of that fee, but this ordinance shall not be codified.
5. This ordinance shall take effect December 2, 2021 and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of November 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.B
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, to accept from the Office of
the Governor, Homeland Security Grant Division for the 2021 State
Homeland Security Program — Grant/Application #4216201, in the
amount of$29,250.00.
INITIATING DEPT: Fire
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficient Delivery of City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: Back on February 2, 2021, the Fire Department came before City
Council and was approved to apply for a Homeland Security Grant to purchase HAZMAT
equipment (Grant/Application # 4216201). We are glad to announce that the Fire
Department has been awarded this grant in the amount of $29,250.00. There is no
associated match with this Homeland Security Grant fund.
The Wichita Falls Fire Department Hazardous Material Team is a regional response team
and this funding will continue to support the mission of responding to HAZMAT incidents
in the NORTEX region.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
® Fire Chief
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.0
Ordinance No.
Ordinance authorizing the City Manager, to accept from the Office of
the Governor, Homeland Security Grant Division for the 2021 State
Homeland Security Program — Grant Number 4216201, in the amount
of $29,250.00
WHEREAS, The City Council finds it in the best interest of the citizens of Wichita
Falls to accept this Grant in the amount of$29,250.00 (Grant #: 4216201) for the FY2021
Homeland Security Grant Program; and,
WHEREAS, The City Council agrees to provide applicable matching funds for the
said project as required by the State Homeland Security Grant Funding application; and,
WHEREAS, The City Council agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the
Office of the Governor funds, the City Council assures that the funds will be returned to
the Office of the Governor in full; and,
WHEREAS, The City Council designates Darron Leiker, City Manager, as the
grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for,
accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The 2021 State Homeland Security Grant for HAZMAT equipment in the amount
of $29,250.00 is hereby accepted and the City Manager is authorized to execute
a contract with the Office of the Governor, Homeland Security Division accepting
the grant and other documents related thereto.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.0
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance appropriating $29,118.00 of grant funds pursuant to the
2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Program, appropriating said funds to the Special Revenue Fund,
and authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents
necessary to accept and share said funds.
INITIATING DEPT: Police
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: The City Council, on July 20, 2021, authorized the City Manager to
apply for the FY 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant in the amount
of $29,118.00. The City was recently awarded these non-matching grant funds. These
funds will be shared by the Wichita Falls Police Department ($16,014.90) and the
Wichita County Sheriff's Office ($13,103.10). The Police Department intends to use
these funds to assist in the purchase of equipment for the Criminal Investigation
Section, the Training Section, the Communications Section, and Police Headquarters.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached ordinance appropriating the
grant funds.
® Police Chief
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.D
Ordinance No.
Ordinance appropriating $29,118.00 of grant funds pursuant to the
2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Program, appropriating said funds to the Special Revenue Fund, and
authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to
accept and share said funds
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls has been awarded a non-matching grant for
$29,118.00 from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program;
and,
WHEREAS, these funds will be shared by the Wichita Falls Police Department
($16,014.90) and the Wichita County Sheriff's Office ($13,103.10), co-applicant for such
grant; and,
WHEREAS, these funds are to be used to purchase equipment for the Criminal
Investigation Section, the Training Section, the Communications Section, and Police
Headquarters.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The City of Wichita Falls hereby accepts the sum of $29,118.00 as awarded by
the 2021 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program, and said
funds are appropriated to the Special Revenue Fund to account for expenditures of the
program, Grant Award #15PBJA-21-GG-01907-JAGX.
The City Manager is authorized to execute all documents necessary to accept
and share the aforementioned grant funds, including, but not limited to, agreements with
granting agencies and with Wichita County.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.D
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Section 2 of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee
schedule applied to Development Services operations; providing for
severability; providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and
providing an effective date.
INITIATING DEPT: Development Services
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice effective governance
BACKGROUND:
Timeline:
• FY 2010 — Most recent comprehensive development fee increases approved by
City Council;
• December 2020 — July 2021 - City staff conducts development fee study/survey
using the same benchmark cities used in MAG compensation study.
• July 6, 2021 - Study/survey results presented to City Council. Direction from
Council at that time was to propose increases as part of FY 2022 budget;
• July 9, 2021 — Similar presentation provided to development community as part of
the City's quarterly meetings with those stakeholders;
• September 17, 2021 — Proposed development fee increases presented to
development community stakeholders as part of the City's quarterly meetings with
those stakeholders. This particular meeting was "moved up"two weeks specifically
to provide the group the proposal in advance of the City Council's consideration
scheduled for the following Tuesday.
• September 21, 2021 - As part of the consideration of the FY 2022 budget, fee
schedule considered by City Council that included proposed fee increases for
development services. By 3-3 vote, proposed fee increases for development fees
fails. Staff directed to bring back a modified proposal and "don't delay."
• October 11, 2021 - City staff and Councilor Whiteley meet with a small group of
local builders/contractors regarding proposal. While there was no consensus from
the group on "acceptable" fee increases, there was consensus that costs to the
City to provide services have increased and that fee increases are necessary.
• November 2, 2021 — City Council to consider modified proposal that facilitates a
plan to increase the major building permit fees to "average" over the next four (4)
years (i.e. 12.5%/year) as opposed to the original proposal of 50% this year.
PAGE 1 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
At the September 21, 2021, City Council meeting the Council considered the City's annual
Fee Ordinance, which included proposed fee increases for building permits/inspections;
platting and zoning fees; and fees for the Vacant Structure Registry Ordinance (VSRO).
The proposed increases would have brought the City's fees charged to its customers for
related services to the "average" of the benchmark cities, as presented on July 6, 2021.
At the September 21 meeting, the Council voted to remove and deny approval of two (2)
sections in the ordinance (Building Inspections & Animal Services). Section 2 of the
proposed ordinance includes the fees associated with building permits, platting/zoning
applications, and the VSRO. The VSRO fees are not able to be collected until enacted by
the ordinance.
At the direction of Council at the September 21st meeting, staff met with the
representatives from the development community, (i.e. trade contractors, home builders,
commercial builders, and developers) on October 11, 2021, to discuss revisions to the
proposed building/development-related fees to reach a general consensus on revisions
to bring back to Council for consideration. From those discussions, no clear consensus
from the development group on acceptable fee increases was reached; however, there
was acknowledgement and understanding from the group that the costs to the City to
provide development services have increased since the last fee ordinance update.
There was some agreement among the group on the following changes:
• increasing minimum trade fees from the current $45 charge to $75
• increasing other smaller permit fees to better cover City costs
• increasing re-inspect fees
Since 2010, some building permit fees have had minimal increases. These include
increases in 2010, 2016, and 2019 that generally translated to $1-5 in total increases for
basic permits. There have been no application fee increases for zoning/platting fees since
2010. An administrative charge of $100 was added in 2018 for filing fee costs that are
paid directly to the County Clerk.
The proposed fee changes, outlined below, facilitate a plan to increase fees to the
average of the benchmark cities over the course of the next four (4) years, as opposed to
the original proposal to increase such to average this year that failed by a vote of 3-3 on
September 21, 2021.
Building Inspection Division — Proposed Fee Increases
The attached revised ordinance sections include a number of building permit fee revisions
that were generally agreed upon by the development group, as well as minimum
increases proposed by staff in many areas of plan review fees, single-family permits, and
other permit/review fees designed to be the first step in a multi-year process to bring all
City development fees to the average fee charges among comparable communities.
PAGE 2 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
The proposed revisions/fee increases include:
• increase of 12.5% (or $0.02/sq. ft.) in permit costs for new single-family home
permits,
• increase of 12.5% (or $0.01/sq. ft.) in permit costs for outbuildings (sheds,
carports, etc.)
• increase of 12.5% (or $0.01/sq. ft.) in commercial plan review fees
• increases in re-inspection fees to $45 (1st occ.); $55 (2nd ocC.) & $65 (3rd + ocC.)
• increases of 12.5% for a number of permit fees for commercial remodels/shell
finish-out ($0.01/sq. ft. increase); residential remodel ($0.02/sq. ft. increase);
Planning Division Fees — Proposed Fee Increases
Additionally, the revised fees include proposed 12.5% increases for platting and zoning
application fees:
• $30 increase in final plat application fees
• $20 increase in preliminary plat application fees
• $20 increase in conditional use application fees
• $50 increase in rezone application fees
• $60 increase in Planned Unit Development (PUD) application fees
Vacant Structure Registry Ordinance
Fees for the registration and annual inspection were not revised from the proposed
ordinance and remain at $150 each.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the ordinance, with an implementation date
of January 1, 2022.
® Director of Development Services ® Assistant City Manager
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Ordinance
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 3 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
Ordinance No.
Ordinance amending Section 2 of Ordinance No. 49-2021, the fee
schedule applied to Development Services operations; providing for
severability; providing that such ordinance shall not be codified; and
providing an effective date
WHEREAS, City Staff has studied the cost of providing the services and enforcing
the regulatory schemes which are currently not being covered by the existing fees; and,
WHEREAS, after receiving and reviewing the aforementioned costs, the City
Council finds that the fees established herein do not exceed the amount reasonably
necessary to provide the services and administer and enforce the regulatory programs to
which they are related; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the fines, fees, and rates described herein
are necessary to provide for the services and regulated programs and further finds that
any discrimination established against non-residents in fee amounts does not provide
funds that exceed the taxpayer-funded amount of the described programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1. The following schedule of fees and charges of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 49-
2021 shall be amended and adopted for all Community Development operations, which
are authorized to create or enforce such fees by state or federal law or by the Code of
Ordinances:
2. Community Development Services
2a. Building Inspections
2a-1. Building Permits & Fees: A minimum fee of $,10.00115.00 shall be charged for
issuing any class of permit required by the building code and as required in this section.
In addition to the minimum fee there shall be charged the following inspection fees:
(1) New building construction or addition:
• Single-family or duplex residence, per square foot of building or addition
$0.180.16 $0.18
• Single-family or duplex use storage, outbuilding, carport or patio, per
square foot of building or addition $0.060.05 $0.06
• Commercial use, which includes all other occupancies not listed in this
section, per total square feet of building or addition $0.29
• Commercial storage building, per total square feet of building or addition
$0.10
PAGE 4 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
+—Commercial plan review for remodel work, per value $0..10
CommT rcial plan r� ew, p i io dot of non4er Tea $n 09 -
$0.10 "• h
• Commcrcial plan rcvicw for rcmodcl work, per valuc $0.0018
Commercial plan review for remodel work, per value
$0.0019$0.0019
• Commercial plan review for storage and finish outs, per square foot
_ $0.03 $0.04$0.0'1
(2) Finish out of existing shell buildings or areas within shell buildings, per
total square feet of area $0.07 $0.08$0.08
(3) Repair, alteration or remodel of existing residential buildings, per total
square foot of work area $0.16 $0.18 $0.18
(4) Repair, alteration or remodel of existing commercial buildings, per total
valuation of work $0.005 $0.006 $0.006
(5) Roofing or siding, per square foot of area covered or repaired $0.005
$0.006 $0.006
(6) Window replacement $20.00
(7) Foundation repair $30.00
(8) Foundation only, per square foot of area of foundation $0.003
(9) Signs, each:
• Up to and including 80 square feet of total sign face area (on-
premises) $10.50
• Over 80 square feet of total sign face area (on-premises) $37.00
• All off-premises $89.00
(10) Demolition, which is required for any structure exceeding 150 square feet
in area, per square foot of all structures at each location $0.007
(11) Building moves, which does not include mobile or manufactured homes
transported by a licensed installer $52.00
Plus:
• Aviation, traffic and transportation department fees for moves two
hours or less in duration $100.00
• Aviation, traffic and transportation department fees for moves
exceeding two hours in duration will be the base rate of$100.00, plus
a charge of$65.00 per hour or any part of an hour, per vehicle used for
the time exceeding two hours.
(12) Swimming pool $21.00
(13) Mobile or manufactured home installation outside of a mobile home park
$21.00
(14) Flammable or combustible liquid storage tank or service station pump:
• Each new tank or replacement, which includes test verification
$35.00
(15) Fire suppression system:
• Each fire suppression system $125.00
• Repair or alteration of an existing fire suppression system $25.00
(16) Miscellaneous:
PAGE 5 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
• Demolition cleanup deposit, refundable to the permittee following final
inspection approval, per square foot of all structures at each location
$0.05
• Re_inspection permit
• First occurrence $5.00/15.00
• Second occurrence $15.0055.00
• Each re:inspection thereafter $25.0065.00
• General inspection $54550.00
• Equipment or structures not listed in this section $10.5050.00
• A permit fee may be refunded to the payee upon approval of the building
and code administrator.
• Building, electrical, plumbing, , or mechanical permits issued to
premises located outside of the city limits shall include an additional
inspection service charge of$'12.0050.00.
• Weekend or after hours inspections $75.00 to include the first hour,
$75.00 for each additional hour
(Code 1966, § 23-17(1); Ord. No. 79-2003, § 1, 9-2-2003; Ord. No. 40-2008, § 1, 8-5-
2008; Ord. No. 30-2009, § 2, 5-5-2009; Ord. No. 53-2010, § 3, 9-21-2010)
2a-23. Electrical Permits & Fees: A minimum fee of$$75.00/10.0075.00 shall be
charged for issuing any class of electrical permit required by the electrical code and as
required in this section. In addition to the minimum fee there shall be charged the
following inspection fees:
(1) New building or addition or complete rewire of existing buildings:
• Single-family, multifamily or duplex use not exceeding three stories,
which includes an attached or detached residential garage, storage
or outbuilding, per square foot of building or addition $ 0.018
• Commercial use, which includes all other occupancies not listed in
this section, per square foot of building or addition $0.03
• Commercial storage, warehouse or parking garage, which does not
apply to accessory office areas, per square foot of building or
addition $0.008
• Solar Panels per square foot of panel area .... $.008
(2) Alteration, repair, or replacement of electrical services:
• Existing single-family, duplex, or multifamily residences tenant or
premises, for each: $ 5.25
• Existing commercial electrical installations for each tenant or
premises: $15.75
• Swimming pool, hot tubs, decorative pools or fountains $15.75
• General inspection $5.25
• Re:inspection permit:
o First occurrence $5.00/15.00
o Second occurrence $15.0055.00
PAGE 6 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
o Each re=inspection thereafter $25.0065.00
(3) Miscellaneous electrical fees:
• Clearance to connect electrical service pursuant to 22-224(b)(5)
[following discontinuance of service or change of occupants]:
o Residential $10.50
o Commercial $36.75
2a44. Plumbing Permits: A minimum fee of$75.00/10.0075.00 shall be charged
for issuing any class of permit required by the city plumbing code. In addition to the
minimum fee there shall be charged the following inspection fees:
(1) New building or addition or complete re-plumb of existing building:
• Single-family, multifamily or duplex use not exceeding three stories,
which includes an attached or detached residential garage, storage
or outbuilding per square foot or building or addition $0.019
• Commercial use, which includes all other occupancies not listed in
this section, per square foot of building or addition $0.012
• Commercial storage, warehouse or parking garage which does not
apply to accessory office areas, per square foot of building or
addition $0.008
(2) Alteration, repair or replacement of plumbing service:
• Existing single-family, duplex, or multifamily residences tenant or
premises, for each $5.25
• Alteration, repair, addition to or replacement of plumbing
installations or fixtures on commercial structures, for each
$15.75
(3) General inspection $5.25
(4) Lawn sprinkler system, which includes backflow preventer $32.00
(5) Excavation $15.75
(6) Temporary gas $5.25
(7) Reinspection:
• First occurrence $5.00/15.00
• Second occurrence $15.0055.00
• Each reinspection thereafter $25.0065.00
(8) Inspections for backflow devices $21.00
(9) Other equipment or appliances not listed in this section, each $5.25
(Code 1966, § 23-17(3); Ord. No. 79-2003, § 1, 9-2-2003; Ord. No. 40-2008, § 1, 8-5-
2008; Ord. No. 53-2010, § 3, 9-21-2010)
2a-45. Mechanical Permits: A minimum fee of$75.00/10.0075.00 shall be charged
for issuing any class of permit required by the city mechanical code. In addition to the
minimum fee there shall be charged the following inspection fees:
(1) New building or addition or complete re-fit of existing buildings:
PAGE 7 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
• Single-family, multifamily or duplex use not exceeding three stories,
which includes an attached or detached residential garage, storage
or outbuilding, per square foot of building or addition $0.007
• Commercial use, which includes all other occupancies not listed in this
section, per square foot of building or addition $0.009
• Commercial storage, warehouse or parking garage, which does not
apply to accessory office areas, per square foot of building or
addition $0.003
(2) Alteration, repair or replacement of mechanical units:
• Existing single-family, duplex, or multifamily residences tenant or
premise, for each: $5.25
• Alteration, repair, addition to or replacement of mechanical units on
commercial structures, for each: $15.75
(3) Reinspection:
• First occurrence $5.0045.00
• Second occurrence $15.0055.00
• Each re:inspection thereafter $25.0065.00
(4) Other equipment or appliances not listed, each $5.25
(5) General inspection $5.25
(Code 1966, § 23-17(4); Ord. No. 79-2003, § 1, 9-2-2003; Ord. No. 40-2008, § 1, 8-5-
2008; Ord. No. 53-2010, § 3, 9-21-2010)
2b. Code Enforcement
2b-1. Miscellaneous Fees:
(1) Fee to Abate Junk Vehicle no more than $150.00
(2) Public Right-of-Way Sign Removal $25.00 plus $1.00 per day for
storage
(3) Vacant Structure Registry (Annual) ...$150.00
(2)(4) Vacant Structure Inspection Fee (Annual) $150.00
2c. Planning
2c-1. Platting:
(1) Preliminary Plats:
Fees for preliminary platting shall be as follows:
• Up to five acres ....$170.00150.00170.00
• More than five cares ....$170.00150.00170.00
• Plus, additional per acre fee or thereof up to $500.00 maximum....$10.00
(2) Final, Notification and Minor Plats:
PAGE 8 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
(a) Fees for final platting and courthouse filing shall be as follows:
1. Plats within City of Wichita Falls and Wichita County:
Plat Type Wichita County
Final Plat:
Up to five acres $280.00250.00280.00
More than five acres $280.00250.00280.00
Plus, additional per acre fee or $ 10.00
fraction thereof up to $500.00
maximum
Notification Plat, in addition to final $ 75.00
plat fee
Plat Vacation $200.00
Minor Plat $280.00250.00280.00
2. Plats within the Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) Area shall be as
follows:
Plat Type Archer County Clay County
Final Plat:
Up to five acres $250.00280.00280.00 $500.00
More than five acres $250.00280.00280.00 $500.00
Plus, additional per acre fee or $ 10.00 $ 10.00
fraction thereof up to $500.00
maximum
Notification Plat, in addition to $75.00 $75.00
final plat fee
Plat Vacation $200.00 $450.00
Minor Plat $250.00280.00280.00 $500.00
(3) The fees in subsection ((1) and (2)) of this section shall not apply to the
following types of plats:
• Plats submitted by the city or any governmental or public
educational agency.
• Plats submitted to correct minor drafting errors in a recorded plat.
• Plats filed for the purpose of dedicating land to the city in which no
other subdivision of land is shown.
• Replats occasioned by governmental action.
(4) Fees for revised preliminary plats shall apply to the area changed from the
previous submission.
(Code 1966, § 23-17(5))
2c-2. Miscellaneous Development Fees:
PAGE 9 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
(1) Variance, Board of Adjustment, Airport Board of Adjustment ....$200.00
(2) Right-of-way and easement encroachment release $100.00
(3) Street, alley, or easement closure, abandonment, vacation $200.00
(4) Street name change $500.00
(5) Annexation $500.00
(6) Certification letters for zoning, floodplain or building encroachment
Basic fee $25.00
Intensive review fee $50.00
(7) Zoning fees:
• Site plan review:
o Application. This fee shall not apply to site plans
accompanying a conditional use application $75.00
o Appeal $50.00
• Conditional use permit:
o Application $150.00 170.00170.00
o Application for carport $100.00120.00170.00
o Conditional use for communications tower....$250.00
o Appeal $100.00
• Administrative appeals $200.00
• Zoning amendments (rezoning). $'100'150.001150.00
o Up to five acres $,100.00/150.00450.00
o More than five acres V00.00/150.00/150.00
• Plus, per acre or fraction thereof $10.00
o Rezoning to PUD $500.00560.00560.00
• Plus, per acre or fraction thereof $10.00
•(8) Credit Card/Online Transaction Fee...additional 3% of transaction amount.
(Code 1966, § 23-17(6)—(13); Ord. No. 2-2004, § 1, 1-6-2004; Ord. No. 71-2009, § 1,
10-6-2009)
2. The fee schedule established by this ordinance shall be made available to the
public through the Office of the City Clerk, and be published online in such a manner as
to be available to the public.
3. Should any section or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the
ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid.
4. To the extent that the Code of Ordinances establishes the existence of a fee,
this ordinance will govern the amount of that fee, but this ordinance shall not be codified.
5. This ordinance shall take effect December 2January 1 , 202224 and it is so
ordained.
PAGE 10 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of November 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 11 OF 11 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.E
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract
for the Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall Roof Replacement Project to Lydick-
Hooks Roofing Co. of Wichita Falls, Inc. in the amount of
$1,369,300.00.
INITIATING DEPT: Information Technologies & Facilities
STRATEGIC GOAL: Provide Quality Infrastructure
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Alternative Options for Infrastructure Improvements
COMMENTARY: In 2020, it was found that the roof on the Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall
was beginning to fail, causing leaks inside the facility. The Building Maintenance division
reached out to a local roofing company for repair estimates. It was determined the roof
had exceeded its life cycle of 20 years and needed replacement rather than repair. Staff
then contacted Bundy, Young, Sims, & Potter (BYSP) for assistance with the design and
implementation of a new roof and rainwater drainage system. BYSP worked in
conjunction with Lydick-Hooks Roofing Co. Inc. to consult with and install the new roof
and drainage system. On 10/22/21, BYSP submitted a bid for $1,369,300.00 to perform
the aforementioned work. Lydick-Hooks is a member of the BuyBoard cooperative, which
allows the City to purchase directly from them without having to go out to bid. Lydick-
Hooks has helped maintain and repair the roofs of the other buildings on the MPEC
campus. The City has available funds for this project from bond proceeds as part of the
venue tax approved by the City's voters in November 2019.
Texas Local Government Local Government Code §252.022 exempts items purchased through
interlocal cooperative purchasing contracts from the State's competitive bidding requirements.
This chapter does not apply to expenditure for. . . (12) personal property sold. . . under an
interlocal contract for cooperative purchasing administered by a regional planning commission
established under Chapter 391.
The roofing industry is currently having a material shortage and there is a 6-8 month wait
on all material delivery. Once the material is delivered we expect the work to be
completed within 90 days.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to award bid and
contract for the roof replacement of the Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall to Lydick-Hooks Roofing
Co. Inc. in the amount of$1,369,300.00.
® Assistant City Manager
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.A
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.A
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award bid and contract for
the Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall Roof Replacement Project to Lydick-
Hooks Roofing Co. of Wichita Falls, Inc. in the amount of$1,369,300.00
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls is accepting this bid as part of the BuyBoard
cooperative for the Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall Roof Replacement Project; and,
WHEREAS, Lydick-Hooks Roofing Co. Inc. who made a bid with an estimated total
of $1,369,300.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The bid for the Ray Clymer Exhibit Hall Roof Replacement Project is awarded to
Lydick-Hooks Roofing Co. of Wichita Falls, Inc. in an estimated total amount of
$1,369,300.00, and the City Manager is authorized to execute a contract, in a form
approved by the City Attorney, for the City with said Contractor for the construction of
such project.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.A
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution granting permission to the Major Francis Grice Chapter,
National Society Daughters of the American Revolution (NSDAR), to
place a Vietnam War Memorial sculpture on City-owned property.
INITIATING DEPT: Parks & Recreation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Actively Engage and Inform the Public
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Enhance Public Outreach and Engagement
COMMENTARY: In 2017, the Major Francis Grice Chapter NSDAR has requested
permission to place a Vietnam War Memorial sculpture on City property at Lake Wichita.
The request asks for the placement of the sculpture in an area at Lake Wichita near Kemp
Blvd. Boat Ramp proposed by the Lake Wichita Revitalization Committee as a Veterans
Memorial Plaza. At the time of the request, the sculpture was not yet finished but has
now been completed. In fact, it was completed in 2018.
The NSDAR has made the decision to move forward with the display of this sculpture
ahead of the completion of the Veterans Memorial Plaza by the Lake Wichita
Revitalization Committee. The sculpture has been in storage for several years and with
the uncertainty of when the Veterans Memorial Plaza will be constructed, they would like
to place it in the Lake Wichita Park area near the Hike and Bike Trail. It is recognized the
City is not committing funds to install the sculpture but will be maintaining it in the future.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
® Parks & Recreation
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution; Letter of Request
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.B
Resolution No.
Resolution granting permission to the Major Francis Grice Chapter,
NSDAR to place a Vietnam War Memorial sculpture on City owned
property
WHEREAS, the Major Francis Grice Chapter, NSDAR has requested permission
to place a Vietnam War Memorial sculpture on City owned property; and,
WHEREAS, the Major Francis Grice Chapter, NSDAR had previously requested
the sculpture to be located at the Veterans Plaza on Lake Wichita Property but now would
like another location; and,
WHEREAS, THE City is not committing to funding for the placement/installation of
the sculpture but will be maintaining the sculpture.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The Major Francis Grice Chapter, NSDAR is hereby given permission to place a
Vietnam War Memorial sculpture on a mutually agreed location on City owned property.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021 .
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.B
DAR
(Daughters of the
American Revolution.
October 75,71}71
Blake Jur[cek
13007:h Street
W'ir•hata Falls,TX?6307
Dear Mr.Jurecek,
On behalf of the Major Francis Grace Chapter,NSDAR I would like to torn-oily reQuest permission from the
City of wiehtta Falls to place our Vietnam Monurnert at Lake Wichita Park Previously,the Council approved
placernent of the monument at the planned Veteran's PIwa at Lake Wichita.Funding for the plaza has not
been completed arc time is of the essence that installation of the rronurnent happen sootier,Instead of
later We are Io s inR the Vietnam Veterans the monument seeks to honor as time continues to pass,
The Major Francis Grace Chapter,hSOAk commissioned this mone.:rrert to be created by Texas artist and
Wir,.hita Falls ratrve,Garland U eekc at the cost of S.170,C00.The chapter raised the funds,and the
monument was completed and has been in storage far 3 years.The chanter has raised the needed funds
and secured a local,reputable:ornpaey to rnst all the monument at Lakr:Wich to Park,once approval is
granted. The chapter holds hope for an installation to commence December 2021.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
ftespe:tfLily submitted,
.; ,
C....1.140..
Sonja Cyan .
Regent
Major FrancisGrin:Chapter, NSDAR
Major Francis Grice Chapter,NSDAR
1,14 R i d!c'anont Drive
Wichita Falls.Texas'76309
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.B
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award a professional
services agreement with SAFEbuilt Texas, LLC to conduct building
inspection services for the new Wichita Falls Independent School
District (WFISD) Legacy and Memorial High Schools; associated
athletic/band facilities and accessory structures; and providing for a
set rate for on-call building and fire code inspections and permit plan
review as needed.
INITIATING DEPT: Development Services/Building Inspections Division
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Reinforce a Culture of Superior Customer Service
COMMENTARY: The recommended contract with SAFEBuilt Texas, LLC will provide for:
1) third-party building inspections for the new Wichita Falls Independent School District
(WFISD) Legacy and Memorial High Schools and their associated athletic/band facilities
accessory structures, and 2) separate and apart from 1), above, a set rate for on-call
building and fire code inspections and permit plan review as needed in the event such is
needed due to City staffing shortages and/or increased needs of the development
community.
While these contract inspectors would be employed by the company and provided to the
City as part of this contract, the inspectors would still be under the guidance and "final
call" of the City's Chief Building Official.
BACKGROUND: In November 2020, the voters of Wichita Falls passed a $290 million
bond to build two new high schools. An additional $30 million bond was passed in May
2021 for new athletic and band facilities to accompany the new high school sites. Both
schools are anticipated to open in August 2024.
Prior to the passing of the voter-approved bonds, City staff and administration had
identified the impact that the construction of these projects would have on inspection
services provided by all City departments/divisions involved in the development process.
Particularly, the impacts would be felt by the Building Inspections Division due to the
extensive scope, size, elements and simultaneous construction of the new high schools.
Other large-scale projects, such as the Hotel/Conference Center, along with the current
volume of day-to-day commercial and residential construction occurring across the City
have the potential to further impact both the internal customer service delivery of the
Building Inspections division and the overall construction of other projects over the course
of the next two to three years.
PAGE 1 OF 5 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.0
In an effort to maintain the current standard of same-day inspections for the Building
Inspections Division, staff have had discussions with state-wide third-party firms that
perform the required International Code Council (ICC) certified inspection services.
Primarily, the discussion for the use of these firms/services centered around assistance
with building inspection services because of the overall number and scope the inspections
required for the new high school projects. Other departments/divisions, such as Planning,
Health Dept., Public Works were not included in the discussed scope of work since the
overall number and extent of their inspections during the duration of the construction are
substantially less than those provided by the Building Inspections Division. Additionally,
concerns about significant additions to the overall cost, specific inspector certifications
(i.e. engineering, health code, planning) and knowledge of the applicable City
ordinances/regulations by adding these additional department/division contract services
led to these divisions being excluded from the scope of work.
After receiving initial quotes from two firms, and further negotiation, staff is proposing
Council consideration of a contract with SAFEBuilt Texas, LLC for all Building Inspection
services for the two new high schools and their associated athletic/band facilities, outlined
in contract Exhibit A.
The contract also includes the option for the City to use SAFEBuilt Texas, LLC for
additional building and fire code inspection and plan review services on an on-call basis
for other residential and commercial projects. These fees are outlined in contract Exhibit
A and B. If needed, these on-call services can be utilized if the Building Inspection Division
experiences inspector shortages due to extended illness and/or retirement. It is
anticipated that these services will be used sparingly, but are available if needed.
The total cost of the contract for the inspection services for the high school projects is
$157,000 in total (or$78,500 per school)which will be covered by the building permit fees
collected for those projects. SAFEBuilt Texas, Inc. is affiliated with the buy board, Omnia
Partners. Because the City subscribes to Omnia Partners, this set pricing is available for
the City to utilize, and a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) for these services is not
required.
In order to appropriate the collected fees for the new high schools to cover the cost of the
services in the contract, an FY 2022 Budget appropriation of those funds is also included
as part of the agenda item and staff recommendation. Any additional on-call
inspection/plan review services that may be needed beyond those provided for the new
high school projects will be funded through existing budget appropriations or future
appropriations if needed.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends execution of this service agreement and
associated budget appropriation in order to ensure efficient and timely completion of
building inspections across the city.
® Director, Development Services ® Assistant City Manager
PAGE 2 OF 5 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.0
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution, Building Inspection Services Agreement
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 3 OF 5 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.0
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to award a professional
services agreement with SAFEbuilt Texas, LLC to conduct building
inspection services for the new Wichita Falls Independent School
District (WFISD) Legacy and Memorial High Schools; associated
athletic/band facilities and accessory structures; and providing for a
set rate for on-call building and fire code inspections and permit plan
review as needed
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls conducts building inspection and plan review
services for all residential and non-residential construction projects within the City limits;
and,
WHEREAS, the ability to provide these services is critical to safe and timely
construction across the city; and,
WHEREAS, the construction of two new high schools and their associated athletic
and band facilities will impact the efficient delivery of these services provided by the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The City Manager is authorized to execute a professional services agreement with
SAFEbuilt Texas, LLC to conduct building inspection services for the new Wichita
Falls Independent School District (WFISD) Legacy and Memorial High Schools;
associated athletic facilities and accessory structures; and providing for a set rate for
future on-call building and fire code inspections and plan review services as needed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 4 OF 5 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.0
PAGE 5 OF 5 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.0
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute contracts with
several community service organizations and organizations that
promote the convention and tourism industry.
INITIATING DEPT: Finance/Community Development
STRATEGIC GOAL: Accelerate Economic Growth
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Revitalize Depressed and Declining Neighborhoods
COMMENTARY: The 2021-22 Adopted Budget includes funds in the Community
Development Block Grant Program, Hotel/Motel Fund, and the General Fund for several
community service organizations and organizations that promote the convention and
tourism industry. These funds were set out in the budget as per the recommendations of
the City Council Committee on Outside Agency Funding. The Helen Farabee Center
funding was approved by the Committee for use of ARPA funds in the current year.
This resolution has been prepared to authorize the City Manager to enter into contracts
with these organizations in the amounts, and for the purposes, authorized by the City
Council. Due to the number of contracts being authorized, they have not been included
in the agenda materials. Each of the contracts follows a similar format; however, there
are some provisions in the CDBG contracts that are included to comply with federal grant
guidelines. The contract terms follow the same terms and conditions as previous years.
They generally provide for the scope of services to be performed by the agency and the
specific uses for the funds; a term of one year beginning October 1, 2021 and ending
September 30, 2022; maximum compensation; method of payment to the contractors;
specific financial reports and records to be generated and maintained; and insurance
requirements.
The resolution is recommended for approval.
® Chief Financial Officer
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.D
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute contracts with
several community service organizations and organizations that
promote the convention and tourism industry
WHEREAS, the 2021-22 Adopted Budget includes funds for several community
service organizations and organizations that promote the convention and tourism
industry; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to enter into contracts with these agencies to
provide the terms and conditions for the use of these funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into contracts with the following
organizations in the amounts specified below:
Agency Fund Amount
Helen Farabee Regional MHMR Centers COVID Grant $100,000
Teen Court General $7,250
Child Care Incorporated CDBG $130,622
(Operations)
Senior Citizens Services of North CDBG $55,980
Texas (Meals on Wheels)
Christmas in Action CDBG $100,000
Child Care Inc. (Zale Campus Safety) CDBG $61,134
First Step (ADA & Rehab Improvements) CDBG $40,413
Arts Council Wichita Falls (Broadband) CDBG-Covid $15,000
Community Healthcare Center CDBG-Covid $49,075
(HVAC & Water Heater Replace)
First Step CDBG-Covid $56,947
PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.D
Agency Fund Amount
Wichita Falls Arts Commission Hotel/Motel $50,000
River Bend Nature Works Hotel/Motel $6,000
Fantasy of Lights Basketball Hotel/Motel $6,500
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.D
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of one 5-yard
dump truck from the low bidder, Sam Pack's Five Star Ford, Ltd. in
the amount of $96,602.00; or to the local bidder TNTX, LLC dba
Lonestar Truck Group in the amount of$98,364.00.
INITIATING DEPT: Aviation, Traffic, & Transportation
STRATEGIC GOAL: Efficiently Deliver City Services
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Practice Effective Governance
COMMENTARY: Bids were opened October 14, 2021, for the purchase of one 5-yard
dump truck. The dump truck will be comprised of a Ford F-750 33,000 GVW cab and
chassis and a Warren 5-yard dump body or a Freightliner M2 33,000 GVW cab and
chassis and a Ledwell 5-yard dump body. The cost difference is $1,762.00. The unit will
be used by the Street Division. Three bids were received as follows:
Sam Pack's Five Star Ford Ford F-750 $96,602.00
Carrollton, Texas
Lonestar Truck Group Freightliner M2 $98,364.00
Wichita Falls, Texas
Summit Truck Group International MV $99,425.71
Wichita Falls, Texas
Local Government Code Section §271.9051 .....allows a municipality to award a bid that
is within five percent of the lowest bid price received to the bidder whose principal place
of business is in the municipality if the governing body of the municipality determines, in
writing, that the local bidder offers the municipality the best combination of contract price
and additional economic development opportunities for the municipality created by the
contract award, including the employment of residents of the municipality and increased
tax revenues to the municipality.....
It is staff's opinion that both units are acceptable.
Budgeted Amount: $94,000.00 $94,000.00
Cost for Sam Pack: $96,602.00 Cost for Lonestar: $98,364.00
Over Budget: -$2,602.00 Over Budget: -$4,364.00
® Director of Traffic & Transportation
PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.E
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution
171 Budget Office Review
1 City Attorney Review
Fl City Manager Approval
•
•
aF"
•
• 1
+"tl'
.nw .a F wFY .11
11.E y .4.
. a
.
•
PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.E
1 011 412 02 1 BID TABULATION
BID 21-20
33,000 GVW C&C CREW TRUCKS & 5-YARD DUMP TRUCK
MANDATORY PRE-BID
(2 ADDENDUMS)
VENDOR MODEL CREW TRUCKS(2) 5-YD DUMP
EACH TOTAL TRUCK
BRUCKNER'S TRUCK SALES Mack $108,171 $216,342 No B d
WICHITA FALLS,TX MD7
LONESTAR TRUCK GROUP Freightliner $91,908 $183,816 $96,151
WICHITA FALLS,TX M2 Knapheide Body Davis Body
$92,593 $185,186 $98,364
RKI Body Ledwell Body
SAM PACK'S FIVE STAR FORD Ford $90,892 $181,784 $96,602
CARROLLTON,TX F-750 RKI Body/RKI Crane Warren Body
2023
$92,651 $185,302
RKI Body/Littmoore Crane
$95,886 $191,772
Knapheide Body/Stellar Crane
SUMMIT TRUCK GROUP International $93,937.69 $187,875 $99,425.71
WICHITA FALLS,TX MV
PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.E
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing award of bid for the purchase of one 5-yard
dump truck from the low bidder, Sam Pack's Five Star Ford, Ltd. in the
amount of $96,602.00 or to the local bidder TNTX, LLC dba Lonestar
Truck Group in the amount of$98,364.00
WHEREAS, the City advertised and requested bids for the purchase of one 5-yard
dump truck; and,
WHEREAS, bids were received and publicly opened on October 14, 2021; and,
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the bid from the low bidder, Sam Pack's Five
Star Ford and the local bidder Lonestar Truck Group and find both acceptable, and
WHEREAS, Local Government Code Section §271.9051 .....allows a municipality
to award a bid that is within five percent of the lowest bid price received to the bidder
whose principal place of business is in the municipality if the governing body of the
municipality determines, in writing, that the local bidder offers the municipality the best
combination of contract price and additional economic development opportunities for the
municipality created by the contract award, including the employment of residents of the
municipality and increased tax revenues to the municipality.....
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
City staff are authorized to execute all documents necessary to purchase:
One 5-yard dump truck from the low bidder, Sam Pack's Five Star Ford, Ltd.
in the amount of $96,602.
or
One 5-yard dump truck from the local bidder, TNTX, LLC dba Lonestar
Truck Group in the amount of$98,364.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.E
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement
with Wichita County for reimbursement of water and sewer
improvements serving the Wichita Falls Economic Development
Corporation (WFEDC)-Owned Business Park in the amount of
$1,045,845.00.
INITIATING DEPT: Public Works
STRATEGIC GOAL: Provide Quality Infrastructure
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Alternative Options for Infrastructure Improvements
COMMENTARY: On October 18, 2021 the Wichita County Commissioner Court
approved an inter-local agreement to reimburse the WFEDC (Type A/4A) for water and
sewer improvements serving corporation-owned Business Park on the City's southeast
side. These improvements include approximately 4,340 feet of water main and 3,700 feet
of sewer main along Midwestern Parkway and extension of the sewer collection extending
off-site to accommodate future development within the business park. These
improvements will provide improved and additional infrastructure making the business
park a "shovel-ready" location for future industrial prospects. The County intends to utilize
a portion of their American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for this project.
The agreement was prepared by the City's Legal Department and the amount of the
reimbursement is based on actual construction costs of the project. Staff recommends
execution of the agreement.
® Director, Public Works
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution , Agreement
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement
with Wichita County for reimbursement of water and sewer
improvements serving the Wichita Falls Economic Development
Corporation Business Park in the amount of$1,045,845.00.
WHEREAS, the City of Wichita Falls Economic Development Corporation owns
the City's Business Park;
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Corporation has determined an
investment in water and sewer mains would make the business park much more
marketable to future industrial expansions and investments;
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Corporation Business Park lies entirely
within Wichita County;
WHEREAS, the Wichita County Commissioners have determined an investment
in the Business Park would benefit the County as a whole by attracting future industrial
development;
WHEREAS, Water and sewer infrastructure improvements are eligible for the use
of American Rescue Plan Act funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The Mayor is authorized to execute a Interlocal agreement with Wichita County for
reimbursement of water and sewer improvements for the Wichita Falls Economic
Development Corporation Business Park in the amount of$1,045,845.00.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 2 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
SEPARATE WRITTEN AJ'PF L 1\ .\[ i )1 I 11.RI .1 )t .tE.t t ' )PE'k \T It 1\ 1 1 )\ [ Id. yt°f.
WITH THE CITY OFWICIHIIa I ;11.1.. . If:NASI [1I{ I III 1 SI 0.1 (41E I [R[..'S
STATE AND L.00AL FJI C'.l1. RT-.(-0\ F.R1' FUNDS FOR J III- INS' 11. I .y I ION OF
SAN riAR Y SEWER LINES ANL) 1
I hs: Commissioners,Coors 01 ciVichini CAnurlliw`_ Texas, in compliance with See. 79 1.1)14 of
the Texus Ii7keJ'nnitinl ('4`',lL. . the_r. i:,c kniik311 C'L)iipQrd1ion Act and hck '.F. the
L.'or11IlIoricL°I11e`Ilt kir d.111 ' \S I'rI_ I'.i e"t�[1�i['M�t. I'I!L[l['C}ke i}1' i[lc L I IeC1 mailer of..in 1ntLrls}ciii
('tyntraet ka'ilh Illc ("it‘ of 14 ie"III[LL hills, Lows. hereby iL4i[fl{Ir1icand Jl a]arL n 4 tl}i:, 1e [} 1J Lte
I7e'e 1IIc kc'ri[len .I[711r1)t.1.] I it thti proposed project. In this reg.arL[, thc' Illllt}.k i:l provisions sy?E�i
to such I1rL)I L±''L.^L[ lion ;I,'4 i ('LiL}J);<`.IiIIi4111 C-I'nirac:t;
rhis approval Iw NAT:ir:ite and Ji.,tincl from the Interlocal Ccwip.'i,Ltl'xn Conn;l 't It 411.
The plxipo.ed project Wichita Cciunty to:
tt.aT,e ule'ai[jhle ul[he City{}I 4Vichi I.i >',,I I:,,"f L xaka vL porrion of IN.:. ('Lyl'+1ri..0 ruw
klt;EEL 4111d LI}e'yl I 1 1%c'idi Rccu',4-iv hind { (,SI`RI''I' rccci Ld by Ihc County. These
Fonds'*are :nie11LIe'SI I" [ rc}k iIlL: -t11'>•rdri.c Isl I,lle', I_}Mc':rl.and 'hand ti' u crlurlcilt+ in
rcsliolle.l:lri (..(:) I[) ILA :7.Ih] in their citi'hri rlw,.',1111air1 (.'J\`lf)— I
Lin Illcir LonlMMtI Ili 1I ~, rL ..IiL III,. ;II1{] hlr<ittc ,c4 dhi 11e la,all of t[lc County his
project make:, ,Lti.LiI.Lr I: I'} the (Ciic of WicIiil.l Fi,11, ;1M45184 O41 for installing
1[)1113AI 15 inch ,;IiiII,1r 4;e r Iirt • iIr11')rco.emeriti, Lind I2 inch ti `:1Icr line
Hopi,yke.lil '!1ts to serve she. Wich[I.} } .I[I Hti irlc„ J'eli'a I ,a°c I-. IIIi'1t A11,
The Commis-Nioners Court of Wichita Co'ttn '..Tc.x.xi specifically finds that the herein
11s:',LiiIR el pre}ve't would ,crx°4 i public purfxxwc:ind IVi i ld Esc herlet1+:i t1 10 the citizen of 'Lk:Ilita
t l}u111w.Tc d .
Date: October I S, 2021
Woodrow W"_ C osm nn,Jr.., Co ly.Ridge
AZTES T:
Lori Bo}1 inon.Cn ty((jerk��
I''L . rc rxy°i 41r1f_i.i't I 1,,i o, 11 %iv111....,•1\.i,...Its°d giAt'lei.]L�i1,k'IiI��'kk 14".ti11'hk err. l (II I1.!.A1'I'I::bk'.$L tF
iV'1!°rxti11'1,1, !'Lpc711•1.ei1111 1.I)%Ili.Ai I tieMll Hit(Try W!e"HHITk1 AILIi'_'I_,111'1 il.tik
PAGE 3 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
i
s
ii
Ins / +
_,----- Ili 0 ---4
c
SI'l MP n
s . Li:
1,
{4..... . _ _____
•
U - .ii.r.
T.
_
M o I n
, 0,
_i____ __ r_ „.
. 1, .
71sa�M ,
_ _ _ _„i,..._
— —
:pWi. Moil= 1—
'
12'4M Al&' I,�
K1r
1 1 - 1
i 1 I
Exhibit A
'61Vaecr& SaFiita cw•cr Plan
Ficliita Falls Business Park , _,,
,. .. Wichita Falk. Texas
.4 ,
c 1 -t...''15r-,n.1•. 'WO".11s1h+s.1,'i1.r,.•.;"1 V.111L.k..., I\_!a'.".I•+-t'•.";1..11I#.111••... 1,11\W I% *I I'...F \I'F^:1A'RFnlf'APF'9ki:11':11,OF
I',IIkl<k4tfINIIH%11.1111.ca11, ti" I IIIIIFIIt ,i1aih4a14IIIIaI-Idi.S` _:I wI.....
PAGE 4 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
1.o( \I. . 4;RI:I•.' 112.y.1. BI2. 1.1% EEN
HE CITY OF •4'l[`EI11 Xla = 1_I..ti I'1-A...xs \NED \1 I( t...n. 1 (.'(R T.11
I I .N XS" FOR 'L lfI'' I Sl. OF (:01t1l\ i\ IRl'S ' I 1 I V"_ .1\I-) I ()CAI,
l l: (.°.1J. k l° ( °(} I I \ I I7NDS 11 )I4. INS I :ti.I.: -I II)NI Cilr SANITARY
RY
I. I L.INI'.`s I'll) 1 1 I I°.I*� LINES
f l 11 INTI RI,IW I. ll.;1t11:L1 I E'\'L I I,t'rL°in;Ll'tv'.r referred In as 11lL: ";"LF- real tll"1 is
iri,it14 arid (Tiered d by And hetevicen the ('ii. of Wichita F:!II.. leN,Lts, .1 home. ride rnhElnt ipol
.c!rpii1'.LIILfn 1 -f 11 t- 1°ei d \ It hit:LCouno., 1'1'I'}k htilll ;!tL fl hk' .LI1LI LIlrt11yh (heir
did:. ,IL11hi,ii/c4,1 1-4"pre.u.77l;,,,:n.e'+, pursuant It} the 1,17,0,i...ions of the InierlitL':Ll Cooperation n : ci,
Texas f.ii!1'.iniii.ril 791 I and the i•I[TV are referred Io col lec,i'1cLy
herein .is the 1ntlividLldliv a!, u.~ f .Lri4
W°1TNI;NSITII;
WHEREAS. I lu., \ rL't'li'1L 1:1 1 .LLII I1g11'I1L`tI h "L {"ii.ipe'.7'4 I or,art' 1 k eminent C.'t5LiL.
and,
WHEREAS. the P Irtic arc local government , as that tern} k defined in Section 791.011
of the Tcxaw cciv'ernliiL:nL ('. Li': arid.
li•'IIE:I E AS.. on P Lurch I I. 2021_ Inc American Res4'1.c ]'I.a1. l,.I '.tlal': ; \%,is signed 11n!^
law law the President' :iIiLI SL.._Li iii 91.)1)] of, ]tPA girl ctit`_Cic 'II:] ! VI cifIIIL~ si:k•L:i4 Seetiril v Aci 1 i
!111L` \Li! to dlii1 section NO. which i ,1 Ilk t '. II~:1 it-us S1:i1e .anal Local €-isc,il Rec over\
1•1 rid.a'•` ° T:Rl:I These funds Lire intended to provide ,Lippori It State, I t*c';LI .ind Tribal
L1i�tirol6;ILIJ[. inresporLLlll1`' toIliL impact iif CON'If 19 and inihcireIfort. to contain CD '1I)- IL1
on iiI4..r communities_ residents. and hu%inc..,. and,
secii;}n tiC); final for metropolitan cities, nonentiticment units
of local el'intent_. mid 1.011111 is, !hat used ii 5 make nLces.ary investments in water,ewer,
�r liro L iI1a111d: ;Ind.
'4 •'HERFAS, F'selttc.. ;irt :a1I L1L1;11rP1a:tI entities: tiixdet. . RPA and deem this :Ayareernent ir+
n wc' ,art liir 11tr hi..rrlil Ili'lit4 I,,Ihh : likil cutll }"aurk Y tr'p.rli7rr11 under an".
LgIccIttt'ril ;And C. pill.ii.l4 llk4 Lt. 4'r61t11tinil,11 I4!IiL's1or1 of Ilie .ullie t itiaticr of this
Agreement., lll.il .aII 6LIvision of co,' 1..iiIl c1;h111rc"n.a1(L's the pL`11o1-r111114 I'aity' for 'WI'.11t'ti
performed i nLt r lhk :\!vreei i nt_LLn41 the pel tornialIL e i.11 l lit, l\!recroeioi i. in the. 1I1S111LN1 interest
of both Painick. .iiiJ,
WHEREAS.S. (C JI \.I` 10 give 4'I_I_�. tl L Lllalllt aarn6ulnr Alf ARPA funds Iur the
pi-tiro-se of fiLilwily. Ite L's ,11 1 lupin\elrents Lii tL iItL°r dud sok,el system:* within
Wichita(i.iurIIk .411LI,
Ant nL in kcscui Flan d1CI.,I,1II2I (: }{iJA)_six.',,a+a!;i. h"ill li. I :i' 1i7-?,ti,tnblkw4l;,gL'1 41.ti.C.'.I) 41 41.
Page I of 6
PAGE 5 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
[II I;I 1 ('I-i`Y I,,.dke cenaitl inaprowrinent^; to water and sewer sysierns us shown
II' t .
WIrl'ItI' 4 both governing bodies have reviewed and approved this intwrloeul 44Drcement
and conduit II -, ne;eIi .
NOW, TI[ REFORH, in consideration or the mutual covenants and agreements herein
contained, tlti`. undersigned Parties agree as follows:
I '1 i'1#It1 . \Ftt ri tll1 It
t'q'1CN'Pt agrees to nmiikc m:,i1.:::1. L..• t I I I,iti .8aw_rltl tierin'lillrnga Ii}inch and 15 inch
;;,iii[,�k �4 did r lirn inrt'r;q\°r ruenie ura41 12 inch 4E,iti r lulL• Ilnl ri}Ecmcnt, to■eri,the Wichita Falls
I uiii.'k, Park.(Set. I.'I1Ihir A
II CORONAV'IRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISC-AL RECOVERy FUNDS {CSFRFI
C'OMPLIANC'1.=.
A. The Ctiunty's ay.ard of funds pursuant to thtiis Agreement constitute. a ~,uhatward rif
C'SFRF_ CiTY constitutes 2L 'puss-through'entity as defined under 2 CFR § 201.1..
13. CITY 4hL.LII comply with all rcg iirenlentw itf the CSFRF,
C. CI`I Y quill cO]TLp1\: with, and assist them COUNTY in complying with the Trcaaury
Guidance as it relates. to transter-schaward receipt requirements_
I]_ CiTY shall not use, or 11,1 permit L3tlwrs to use,direcp:Iv or indireeth_
grant funds for any ptsr''•sc [I;,iI vi ,l.,le itnv r 1U1.\ ,;rtdls:il (1 .iitt requirements.
including rCr:iirIirr;' the; -,' . I t Fkl i;cr the federal re'L'Lila!Joni d,na.l"Treason.:
and as they may he amended
E- CITY represents and watliims iliac it Immaintains intcrn.,I controls, poiicic-. Land
procedures to ensure ;iippropri,,1e O%etN[4.I`iI iIt Ei c-[I' snanagerricnl and ph\sical 1i117nc
handling, including, for c .ample. 1 ,r Hie al.oidJI1L. . of {r,md. :icy_Ii ci c_ and
ttlismatittgeine[it of funds.
CITY'; until rccnrtiw :r related to CSFR.F exrendi tip i 4Li`t ,fir l shall ati[1I.�iII
Lt\';1!LIF1ler' ribs inspection upon r°eLILLe t and.l kx tlll reasonable neuIIL`L` by any authorized
a��eniI' h ,er Ildt ti :iiillk° [IIL L'iiiicd States of the .I.rL.L3ure. rinLI chic 1 Lri.LIl
Si:aics [menial hL s enue ,Service. or any combination of tliL' ,taw C..I G knot ledge,
receipt and rc' iL:w', 651 �L]plicLLhlc Icder�ll rote.:dnd requirement as ..et our herein. ~
C err' ...kw tit nI`:I,9III .LII related L;.L the hind .,rod !he use of C'SFRF for no lc ti
thrill d'k4'II aeat4 Lion] thie dace of receipt%A die 1unJ:3_
Paee 2 46
PAGE 6 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
II. i t l ' `+I1i'LI1 be rew}1oI1.,L171' ' tor liii. L'a711'IiF1LI;LI I'a'1Ic'4k ;(IlLI C''o111111iidnec 4rr'iih all federal,
+tti41L`%aid local �, IU+�' , '41;iitir,';„;II•LIIr1;Ill.'c' ,sllllrLlli,i .1111L'},:Y 1110'. tLL1L:`I•.LI,N1:f1'C:Jnd
loL;I ri lc , I Lk4ti, st ites, Lwr•._II1.IIiL.'. and are I:i"niiiui. II', c11.Ln4'lnr .JnLI hcinC
anientli2d and kLl7L.l,.l1e.[l.
T. 1'ITt' 1 III I1 .Li main t•Llni.ls in compliance with ("Iry{7I l :iLhita RLII 1157I IL .
I. L'[I_y may flri7'4'ILIC Liz thc 'IL"I'Jld:l{ 7,7L.Inl r.uditor a Lieu'IL"[I and. LIL'll'.i/Lbl k:aclllti ni tll`
C7G17enLiill:res o1 IIii. I11n414 iTiortt 1]3 LIn1iI funds are spent.
P'li()1$.1S1( ''S
A. �4"IlIL4 Lt}ll ILJk4.111111 Iy.f41':. lllc'. IS.iI`[1t` II1"I'L'17'S Lty;l'ws'II :II ;:�':.'.' ;I'.:" �k:at" courts.
1cIcaieLI 111 4 14'1'hli;L('uar114, .A111.I lib,' t iii'L'.I Sr,LLL's DiwlI IL r Lriii;II 101"-hc. Northern
C7iwUir[ L 1 1t' ^Lti Fill', Di 47 iI rII ,' IL,l '11a1l II,.rI Ifrl . Ii I jtlri�1liLIiL7n .yn�i
111I.`11c'r k4I'dLL` iy111' 1,.41)0LI IL7 I;L 0'.I11wi,I;fln .0.IB11
t111 _11w't 9'II,'III II'. II"V I,Y; l} ili',pith'. L;li' l.` .dIIL`x'+Iiall 41.•1 I.:I+4; ,II'I11 I 115'IL t C\1;LG: +lk
kVliI L', 011a ,ll7�r, II,III iII 3c1.1.11l 14' :I5 31.Ii1I 1;1IL',iI31,IrIIII .L+ .III I"li 1.4...:"II',,'III Forum
B. l'.)1r11 itc 'cwLllllt Lt 7I1. Tile I}.IrtiL''. to ail-, :\h"rL.eineIld 44 Tether- In !'I ISLi L.LItl1 10
rL,0ltie an 4 ti;III1rIv.2r _ ti.p1_Itc uI _Ir1111i I}til'ti5 ;n II3L Par tie, 01L1 ill di
rL IdtL'3 1t7 this ^\preernL:I11 l4 healer,L:ile.I i i' I ''1 L I'rltr.rcl, t;II iiIc,L"I.Lirll for he I1e rik.h.lLt
faith, I7r•47res,iL)rl.iit II'„L1+II1I or vIII'1L'I.14;.L ! :IIIf' i. t71111r14' Ilc`IS III r. IE}[t'nLlt`I1 lu
prevent either P11r11' Iron socking any L7,'I: I I."11C'LI' ykaiil:Le IL ;II I;L4L i11r'171L11L1y' kk'.ylall��
redress in '. r ,•.I . I '11 I'1'i'71'Iwla 111 -.h.F1 l min L1 k'111 LC'11'l ltl;lr'S7I1
Ir1Ihis AL.'reciiiL'nt
C. Nci.Third Tlllti %,:it•.';11L'I';I I, 1..1 II at ' 11}d ti"\a11.l0 c Il:iielit 1'I
th0 :L1hLI I16'111111' in III' k"I:I.I';II'II'. L I '"-' 1 11111iiIL&l. IN Illr[III.I4.'LI t4l
CoftI J eir ,I1. II be L00'111.Ii~LI II'. L'L}i11c1I IrI Ia1, li 011y L.>Li a 1.501:mdil au11 tl trt rCmL'LlleS
or IAny other r1I1e I'•I° Cal}c'.i7F IicQlt ,
I), E.!. 1'.u'CI4'm I',L.'li RIdi1 I.' III:'` :21.,ti[11wnt. ill the llii2[11 II'iL.LI'lc tit [his
\ ii' 1114'e1L. +11.111 Al111 LII•I 11Ikll', =Lltl,ll L'.II1.i."..It ,�IIII -I 'l .1` :I:=�..'1114. 11;I1111;:r5,
{TI'.;7“..L14.:1;I[. or 1'I1 lnL^C17e1'. TIIL'.ti'.t1"Illl, ,.1 ;•I I!;L'I'Ilel11 L'IIL" I};I'I� ,•'I.II !WI Cl4Ciii d
(II t'iI iE�Y'4' 7 t41 he IJ e 4:iL1pkr.ra,'C . LLI 4 1^1Lr L71 tli Lille' l'FLLr1S' tor LLLI' �1LIdlri e
v hu11'ItLcl.
E. No Wa1''e].L11.linliiLlililieS.. 1'111I11J11. irltin,;\ retiriieiii 'II.iII I ' ;let rile Ltotit':II1•e,rncudify
.1Fr a!IILrld 3rt1 !ci'Eil dc1.1211M :iv i'ANC LIE I:I'. ' OF in C 1„i to the Panic..., (heir past or
(are .rii 1JBIlta [x_ 4'Elll7lu.eck_ i.fl' ;1'L'Ill' IfG L'11lphIVL cw. I1:7r It, crL;.ILC an\ legal rights or
ILI1I11 i'll1 l `IiiII LIB :Ir11 Fluid 11:ir;7%, I 114 1',III.it LILS III.'I k,',I' t.. ,1LILlIiti_ or alter to ;Inv
e\I.uil L4I'ILLLnL'r•kL"I Il}C' ,4k:11I,1B)IlII'"y i5l Ille LIL^li.'ri . L51 �'r51a,11i'IIk'I'i:Y1 ISrll'IIIIIIIL� LLIL4IL"I IlIe
,LI 111L, Siati iit I L'\.5.t M11lLt iIiIIIL' 1. L1liy'Ll
Page 3Lit6i
PAGE 7 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
F. Non--\pprclrrluti{1n ,ins! Fiscal Ftlnl:lin . Th..: oh!igiiiions of the. P.irties under thk
Aere 111L"11t ,]l} 111^t constitute a gerteral s? 11m;a1i4o11 or Ir}Ili'.hrf.'line i'r CI[I1 '1 1 iii... fcmr
k,I ii I7 'iLLI? Pin!, is oh]L; :IiL:d to. lek'1'. plei1 -' :Irei,dL.i .La1', Cul'111 ,1t Li
(..i. c. \LL.1!L1) Ert21,11ii•11'd:i11' ][ is unclLrsti.i'i1 ‘in,l .LL!reeLl llLil COI'; l 1. 'hall not ill .ens'
Sint. I",C c1!ii tdL:rc'J .I 17.,rt:l;2r;kith the;C'F] V,nor h.1.11 :illk',of the Panic, in,ln'. mariner
hold thenisel>«es tlut as an .1gc151 ,it,Ifl ieiul representative r1t.the C(}l'N TY.
II. Lntii .W.ee. c1it. This Agreement rept:L enl,: the entire .inwl integrated :igri c111eriL
hcttisecn the Parties and ,k11'c'rsed s i I I I'ritilr ne:,,aIi.11ions, represL:nt:A:lions, of
i.1. 7 eI1ai.IL'I•_ either i5ral ill- IA ill lc1:. This Ayrccrvicril I1'...\ be .urIC.fdCL1 i1nl� h'< v.ri!1L°l1
1n'LrwnLLrlt s1!F1.it I'•.. ed,:h Rim, to thi' 1grcclncnl. : I 1 OFFICIAL, F. ,MP'I 111E 1..,
.ViEN']'. OR RI F!Rl'.` ENI AT1vT: t)E- .iHF. COUNT) HAS AV' A4I 11.101 11 1 .
Iti'l [II R 1'A E'KE'•• OR EM1P1.1F.f], TO .'4M11=:t 1J THIS 11 1RF:E \1F• , [ V\ 'l_I''I
PI Rti( :AN]. 'I C.I "+1°C"F1 EXPRESS :11'TI IORITY AS M.A1 Br i ilk 'a\ I ED BY
] Ill: (it.P, ].R\J\(i lit}T}Y
I l'i Ivcr111r1cr1L II Furlo_i{Ira. A.11 F.1rtics delve Hut [Ilia; L'tilntr.11J is one that pertains ,;01c1>+
to ,, 5 i,,,rnalie!it.i: hint Liken hs ill' on I'i]1.LI1 of the C rlY. ,ill par ies e:press1.
.i.0 ri.i. rll;lt ilie t'H. 't. is not engaging, i.1 :.in proprietary functions.
J.. nntl s 4tl l__L),111. i, ti,. Limit:011n_ Neither P.;rt} shall he I4,1116, hir ionsekolerir1,11
can:ages,ece1L1I11;arL .l.Inia4e ., or damage', for tLn:ih',irbetl. home office cokLrltc;td,
K. \ u.tcr ,1f ,\u me 's Fee.... I1 Iirl :tetii'n .al law or in equity is riec N.s.11"4' to enforce
roe
II1i% ,i.recilke nt. c..11:l1 I1art\ Li_'It'12, hi I1iiy Ila i'k411 IIIt!MCA' floes Jill 5k IF 111i1 s['C']ti [I,
rCL'0k LEI' Its,14,,11 ltila'nti 4.S. !ICC", Ir,111L the oilier parl.\ .\II p;I.rl.Li. LIf der...I;IimLl rlt;iL 1 i.,.\;i
Li a1 {.aix.LI'rlrLI.LIlI Code ''IIhLhi.lptcr I. 44 271.153i ni(.'1I pro,,iLILs ill;it the IL5;;11 ,IrTii'imLI1t
,IL money•i.A:irjC'LI ill a1L L.ikljIJ1IILLLtia:ln hrt)ucht .:iwr.,in,l.i w„otierllll>,eriz Ll cril'ilti, li',t E'a[ti°;I ll
or [l L In[r;1LI. hitkILIL'' ,iliorn,.. ,.cr fees_ All il;Irtli.', Lk" pre sit` ki';LI\t ;ill �i.11[ilk Irk iLfld
oilier rights to reLiuk er attorneys' fees p[1rsii inl toy 2,7 I,I 53t.:L11 v I.dlki ;ill Lp[h r 1,Lv,:
p6
EXECtrTED TO RE EFFECTIVE Ihjw J f d;4t or difitri6, . 202],
WICHITA COUNTY CITY OF WICIIITA FALLS.TEXAS
By; "s r+ ,S L*_,°- te__ fi k.
"W ldrvv, W. "'O.'t y" C�[?,s: n, .Tr_ LL:FIIle:rl ;Lnrc1l.ln;1. !1I;1vIti1
County Judgi.
Page 4 at'6
PAGE 8 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By:
County Clerk Magic. Balthrop,
Appni.,0.1. Approved to Furru:
By
Couni% Dkirier Altorno,N, Chi). AtIorney
1-',14 5 of 6
PAGE 9 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
Exhihii A
. *4'
0
i•'
ill , a
. ();)\\
_.----- %
_...--
% —
E..1 L3— 21. 1=5:11-I.--'
17:
i .
1 -'-
, . 1., ,.....:..
*Fr tar*Jil 1---
i,
10 0
- , ___.
_._.• .
Min' 'A I I.I Li M
Told
Maui
CI
r
aWit I tirtil
rl. i • MR iP, tga
..........4
iDia maim
L' --1., --i r l
:
6111
,NY d,d.r,.
II 1 r V. I 1:h I '
'.:'
7 , t 1111 • a.
i --16"1*1'411 Mitillaiis,"IIRS/P 00 Ili— 2,7 ., _
11 U 1, I
Edible
.11,211"-L-11",' ',..2';!•;n Plan
I: Wichita I-"alls Business Park
' Wichita Fall% Teita% IP
51;IAY:MP: If-Awl 3s 14:-=
i dB MI in de li.
EofS2p k 1%,12--1- ,4iS
.. ...._...
Lffiri 1111rigili!"
— '
PAGE 10 OF 10 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.F
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a development
agreement with Patterson Properties, LTD. for the construction of a
Storm Drain By-Pass as part of their development.
INITIATING DEPT: Public Works
STRATEGIC GOAL: Provide Quality Infrastructure
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Alternative Options for Infrastructure Improvements
COMMENTARY: On October 5, 2021, bids were opened for the Storm Drain Bypass
Project by Corlett, Probst & Boyd, P.L.L.C. The only bidder was Bowles Construction Co.
with a bid price of$134,310.00.
Patterson Properties, LTD contacted the City concerning the failure of a 30-inch drainage
pipe in the right-of-way and a 42-inch drainage pipe through a drainage easement within
Patterson's parking lot. The project improvements will abandon the city-owned drainage
pipe under the dealership parking lot eliminating the continuous maintenance burden from
the City. It will benefit Patterson by re-directing the drainage flow away from their property
in the rear of the dealership to allow for future development. This project will greatly
benefit both the City and Patterson Properties, LTD.
The agreement will split the costs to replace the 30-inch pipe in right-of-way and the
abandonment of the 42-inch pipe in the existing drainage easement. Patterson
Properties, LTD will construct the project and the City will reimburse Patterson for 50% of
the totals costs not to exceed $134,310. Therefore, the total cost to the City will be no
more than $67,155. Any additional costs will be at the responsibility of Patterson
Properties, LTD as outlined in the agreement.
Staff recommends approval of the agreement to move this project forward. Bowles
Construction Co. has completed this type of work previously for the City and developers
and is capable of successfully completing this project. The Stormwater Utility Fund
budgets for maintenance projects which will be used to fund the City's portion of this
project.
® Director, Public Works
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution , Agreement
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 1 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 O.G
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a development
agreement with Patterson Properties, LTD. for the construction of a
Storm Drain By-Pass as part of their development.
WHEREAS, Patterson Properties, LTD wishes to install a new 30-inch reinforced
concrete pipe to connect existing stormwater drainage along the front portion of Patterson
Properties, LTD along Central Freeway, in the City of Wichita Falls, Wichita County,
Texas, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "PROPERTY"); and,
WHEREAS, in connection with the Patterson Properties, LTD installation of the new
30-inch reinforce pipe for stormwater, Patterson Properties, LTD wishes to abandon an
existing 42-inch reinforced concrete pipe that travels under Patterson Properties, LTD
parking lot in a drainage easement; and,
WHEREAS, City finds that, upon successful completion, the Project will promote
local economic development and result in stimulating business and commercial activity
within the City limits, as authorized in Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 380 (the
"Act") and Article 3, Section 52-a of the Texas Constitution; and,
WHEREAS, Parties agree that Patterson Properties, LTD must competitively bid the
Project and choose the lowest bidder; and,
WHEREAS, subject to the conditions set forth herein, the City will reimburse
Patterson Properties, LTD for a portion of the costs Patterson Properties, LTD incurs for
constructing these Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City has sufficient funds on hand and appropriated to reimburse
Patterson Properties, LTD in accordance with this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The City Manager is authorized to execute a development agreement with
Patterson Properties, LTD. for the construction of a Storm Drain By-Pass as part of their
development.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 2 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 O.G
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN PATTERSON PROPERTIES, LTD AND THE CITY OF W[CHITA
FALLS
Trifi Deveioprlehi (Airo,p-rrent") is mode os of this 2nd day cf
November. 2021. b•!..• z.nc occ 1-:tttr_•-sor Probe.7-ties. LTD ("PATTERSON") a.nd thc
City of VI chita Falls ( C'01H .
VVH'I41- . PA——FT:SON Is to install a new 3 -inch reinforwd cP,riP'e!..e pipe
to (77....r-nec-. existncr stx-lv,,ate- ore raoe The tort pc ton at. PATTI:1-0,SONS along
Geri: Road, in le City rit Hills, Wichita ai.-..Jhty. Texas. as.
depiGt.:.-ic on F_xhibi-, A ;,.1.thcc.; Hereto the 'PROPERTY");
rnd
WHFRFAS. v1117 PA—TERSON:S installation of the new 30-inch
rein'c.-oc PlcIC SICM-:Ator, PATTERS ON to abandon an e.x.istirg 42-inch
'7A"-TERSON'S par(ng lot; aid.
WILREAS. -.1-zt. upon .7. occssful oonv;do‘"er, the Pro:cct will prompt°
e,:to re.„::iftin tr...:atilq L.131103 and cor-nercial activity
•I lin.11.;, d.‘", SOVE:HT C;L:de, '.2.;..apter 380 (the
arc Al dc 3, Sc:c:lo-n Df tic and,
WHFRFASi: 11'. c4.)t7‘._)eti:iyer:„.' Did the Project and
the arid,
WHFRFAR7 !‘-‘11.1bi.P.ri In hr.'. nanril'.ions set 4orth herein, CVVF will reimburse
L for a p.ort!,:::-, or trie costs PM TERSON inours for COriStrucnirg
and
WHEREAS, 2;7; s„.,ft;c;ent hand and: appropnatecl to reimburso
P .11
iEREFDRE: tor ad d in consiceration or the muit,a ::.-ornisJes and
he-eby agree as toll:iv:a:
I. PATTERSON:5 Installation Duties
Mdst con-petitive!y b'd the Pro!ect ind C.100F.;P. bidcer
Naw 30-inch reinfcroecl 7:orci ete pipe for r_.13:hags
a) ...73"-.S711Ct :77.11C! shalt '77: a 30-inch
rif•nro•ood ccooro-o existing
uric I I I t standards
PAGE 3 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.G
f the ordinances e the City of WkThita Falls and the design
standards as found in Exhibit A and .1corp rated herein by
reference_
3) Abandonment of ou~rent 4?- r,cti r •rafarcec oonc ere pipe
PATTERSON agrees to abandon the ox:: =inc 42 inch reinforced
concrete pipe that ctarr.n1y runs under PATTERSON'S parking lot
by f llirg said line in accordance with the plans arid specifications of
the Project. PATTERSON further agrees to release C v'F of all future
I aHlit r nnocrod with the r1ti scion d pine.
4) Permits and Governmental Approvals. CitiVF. hereby acknowledges
that none of the oblir ationo of PATTERSON set forth herein shah �e
binding against PATTLH.SON ur.til such time as PATTERSON pays for
all permits and obtains all necessary governmental approvals •n
connection with the improvement,
5) License artd Temporary Easement to Construct. C',f'"F hereby grants
PATTERSON, its agRr.ts, contr €lers, Ewcrieswrs, a-'idl of assigns, a
license and temporary construction easement to cn:er onto the property
t CWF and to rergul 'e ,° e estdian and vehicular trato to such areas
during the construction of the Irr.:provemerts and for all other purposes
necessary to construct the Improvements.
f) No Improvement District or Special Assessments,. CPA? shay not
r,t1 -f^dial assessment district for tie purpose of assess:rig th
PATTERSON i > constructing pursJant to the terms of this
PATTERS N`S con.trl..ction of the lrrmprove:rents as set
-k rVi rie e 'a represent the maxirr'ium liability of PATTERSON to fund and
-a rcverric:.'1tk.
7) Dud said Acceptance_ Sul)Ject to all of the other
1-;....rel.f.J attached. to the ex_.nt ar.y Jr
r rc .-d I' A.gr[::;r..i.r r Ti;
:.I��a.}tFulYt�,.��i pug ,:,ut -.t .Y r.�
t�,vby ( '`''I- :';. I I_F- �r� '�J lial . r• _ c i'I
ry I.�.l. _:V. ..
floral
L I dry FJ.1...1ic !"I , rt}.:;ii::r.t`: [.,:'. long: Ly �v ereln,
I..•1:�5.i:i icr ly give, :t; art, oonve'ti' and '•L I 4irvJic_:. �; i h
CWF. :iss'.cli7£. All s�;oto
�i;'� '':emerlts a •cl lv'vr 'v_�,ul I...'. al;.._IY { i t 7:;..�.:I}' :°:III :I0ill. ,:l':•�:'.k,d it
CVVF accordir•g in
connlianuc with Stat 1
PAGE 4 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 O.G
3
II. C liurF Duties
• ) Nev.' 3f1-inch reinforced concrete pipe for stormwater drainage line
and r bo.ndonment of current 42-inch stcrrnwatLr drainage Tine
A) Upon c r-nc,!etit r•. e!' The c.cnstruc tic at on of the new 30-
inch - ••for•:;cc1 .4}...; ; :.._. :}i, c '�:}! !c}I ' '.a.<I�. ;J..Rir:aae and
ti.c' c_r:cn. •l2'-Inch L}.���IT1}1�+'r,}t'.}r ..:I ::II r3::e line, in
=:: rr=le ave "ti:ihl tihe 12A,1 I Li :i f l spec -ic_,r,•:,r_ 7 i-x 7i1 :: A, grid
CCIVF, GAT stall I I LI i +'.:1,1 for
not :.: exc,r:c:!;.J 3134.310_00, r,':::.=:l:a -i^.-I•'e'd
t. r i. rr:ile:iv; o the projo # , ti=r_.41 if-c'r,...ii Illi 7:1rc:r:• fnn•i:J in
E h7ih:i: B CAT shal: riot :le •=4pul•i'wib•le to: Dry 10's scdl costs
related :a any charge orderS. incr.rred by PATTERSON_
III. Term. The Inprc}ver enb.'; la!' be. :;0mo e:e withH1
PAl LION picks up and pays for Ei.., porrn t;3 and a.:.."r:. r r- ,r.,:! I .; ..:rk,' ::,I.; in L r!nec::isn
with the Development
IV. Veil u c . 1 ai . "ti ci "ert SI .!I Le novo rr ioc b . {aid c.:::l , .r a:!:: .:.f:.:r:iil`[7 :o
the is 'tirLti of el.H':;_ oi.
partials, 71:- c.,o at r,all o7:t o10 prr, ,:c 11rc1: L3-ir�ir�C, :;,I ,:•f or r=l:.:il c ,. r..c;1, `t u: ir'ciilevt.r
to this A i .,.: -.1=?rit ";I 1CIII f t1gri_ mon: or z.'ly+
:ir .. ,;:w,; ..i.> ',as ir' :he Ion:i; I c;h. �r3
FE.liiS:
V_ G Dyer rtlTlerital Function Clause. All I_•tir.ies
r. .,::- r, - �,,.. -rl r "'•>,
O.1„ ,. a t �12 '}'y,',. I:� .�.�I�.I'v - -hc�rmin:� t� '�n��.,. •... `I.Ir��..,:i�:�.'. still ..=.rh ... ...'.^,I•CS3'•/
agree the'. the CA s 'lid4 i.oa:il`f l."I any orapr DUTY
VI. Contractual Damages Limitation Clause_ '\I paciee a^rve that
in this Aaareelnent are limitoc. orl•.. :0 71o2C a_I:h` " :.'•::: °.1"«:.:::I T,::x;I;; I
C
one .>.)ction
exemplary darr.ages.
VII. Waiver of Attorneys' Fee$, If any 3atinn of raw or it equity I:-a noccs_arj
enforce this agreement, each party agrees to pay its own at10-noys' f::c:c;: ,3:r.: ..'; :I
recover i`. , own i°rrneys' fees from the other party. PATTERSON Chu:
.lexes Local Government Coco libol rah `w. 1. § 271." E3(a)(3j :provides that the -eta
amour,: of money aw'ardec in an adjucicaton bro,I^ht ufj,unsl r3 g::v"e:rnmental e'I' I:.,'
.'.nreacii of a cti_rthrnc:,d :rti`,:odes attorneys' fees. Both PATTERSON an
waive all stetuto"v and other r:gh'ts to recover ahtnrrieys' fees pursuant
and all other laws.
PAGE 5 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 O.G
Executed this 2nd day of November, 2021.
Patterson Properties, LTD City of Wichita Falls
a By: , 'lf 170 1�` . — By.
Brenda Patter on Darron Leiker, City Manager
Trustee of Patterson Legacy Trist
Owner of Patterson Properties, LTD
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
PAGE 6 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 O.G
EXHIBIT A
PATTERSON Plans and Specifications to be added
PAGE 7 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 O.G
CONSTRUCTION
PLANS
11'
ST01-0.1 DRAIN PIPE BY—PA
ALONG CENTRAL FREEWAY
F'RON'IAGE ROAD
BLOCK 1.1.1AY0 Si 11.:HDINTSION
AND MOCK-.'9.S'LB LEI '1 A YI.(1E1 SPA':(11Isl)ADDITION
WIC1111'.% ['A F.T.S, Tin:AS
171:111111 A E a'.:112,:l•
TWEE T.41p
.. I -• Rt..0K1051s-Kory.-Eryeak
.1 .; . .
'
• • ; 1 '''- (456.:M;T,m n"ow &sum.P-T-LIC,
;.7-•:=.i': 4101 01.11 LIAULiiliCRO RECUT:AY
Wm.:U:3h FALLA TE:Ekil 1 t=ii
; • . - , ,
;NW 771.1.1.415!.,1: --",'• i. 14 .11:-...?.4k,',..:. . ; " ..;-..t.
..".4:7 1;ek V.ILLUP%IC
1...1,e-n LI
clmN PCIRIP.FIRTIY.S..LESIITJM
J i : ': • ,, ,....c,,,,;W:Z. . :; :.11;X.(;)21.1.11AL rtM7WAY
w v..JR i.i.L7 AUL,.rFaa..9.
• ' ;IELINE:::1:11,41 E.dfl 44..IN
1 -..----, . _.__. •••••• ..:
...„ --.--,••••,. -••• :•••=L!:•'.7...=7=67...'.:'1:....-:!7.7!''!:.t:.•!...•—
. . -
• ,'
1-..-....-5.........
I.. •"•.:. ...`...?' ••••{
i l'-'7. ,,,rr• ''t
i ; ../...•!,
1 .•'.:' .
J.:: •.
1
....7 " " •I ..
. • .. " • ....1,9;7',--,;"•=--m-zt'477- 7,T.17.4.:=-.7,1--,-
i
.7.:Z.-:".', ..';•;.',•..1.,',;Ts`,',=..r.-.G_Trr,-1-,,,-.,4,..-...
Li - ....• ,...141111EN
1 ..••
. )
..5.'t•13!•.:
[.,.:.: .1,J., 44*...... ....1. 3.,,i,gp., .. .. •-••:„...;.. ' " _.....",.;.! V.."..1.-. ••-'-...: i' 3... .. • ......' •
1 '::.ri.LA.7•FF•F na. ";• A . .. -
•44 NLI 11;4) h ,
• {`-...t'-'.1.' '-'-' \ '--. . '::• I •.:--• -.A:" . ' .. . '• tir i '".
41,-.m.4 .•
';I.i'•111.311..?ZS•I17 .,,,,,, .
, .. , • 7.: 70 i;;:.111_-•,. L..'---. d •. -;
V“.1: 1.11,11X1 YLADIV. . .'
' ,11.: ....O•A JO a5 \ -/-T. >1'. . : . ..„—"Lr::-'-' :. ..•
.....• ;e. -.!.: •-.••••-•• ;ICC ._ I.
.31,7,- S3:117....d ii,r1,11,1 •
--c r",+-• .-----?
kr,,, YR,' iLlri.ta •
. ..
\N.!,\.\-- :1"..9%.. Li-,1•••1--.... .,-.-.-:"-Lt T.: '-.,
• %-ir. c“
• .
. . •-!e•p•—•-•-..+4 .-, 'L...! Q ._ .4-- - .t
-Ft%.141 ! ........." \-- '',.. • . !fje -..;
\ ';'' 'N. • '•:'''
. • .- - ., 1 '.. . 1!...-7' :- `. ' =
II ..i • 1-- -,
. -- ! `. • -- ,1• .--1 . sr.... '5 d e,i -;...., .:';..]..j
,..-,..„ .... .
. -. i .-•-'._.,t./I' •-- - .7:7 •,:. ....,. ...-.. ,.._...-:
• ...,..'. ''...:. • .. '. .....,'...':... .......i - I.- - ',. . ...., '2'0%7.,..'7,,!I.q '...7 -ri ` i ..; a' .!.. " , _....'•.4:-.: I.
. .. .
.:k.4‹...• N.c• ".. ...,.. e J. .; " 7.7 ' - .'.• -- -: • : ' - • i-, t.--=';t:....kizix,;"7- -,‘A-; ;i:I'l :_.4- 1 7.',...;'. .:-•-:'
. .
- . -- ' . ..\•-,.,',.„. \.V,,E•••• .'.-. :. ....--,J... ..' i _ - 1
, ''.:I". \ \.-%:i..';:i,.. '.,..' c,....\i,...--,; •- .:...,._.. . ,
.-, i .[.7-..,. f', , -...r „:in.:,•., ,- .4 2...,_ .,.._ _..,E . ..,__
. .. .
'•\,'; j -' • -' •:.• "•:•?.E Ii''',' -— ' •L'. -. • '..-%%-. •7"- --. '''-',.. 'FT
: . •-----"'2". '..1 ' . ••\''S-' '\ .;•% ' V.".:".. .\ . ' -... i. "' •-
... .... ..... .. /,. .• ‘.......::::......:„... ':',-..• • ;'.; ., c).. " •'.." •i t
J• /.. - -...-•,-- " : .
I4 ?,./ ,;• \ -:., •••• , ..... ..:\ . ...:.;! ...! -;'''..---; I H „.,..,--14-:-. t'.1.`,:. .;!-;••: ••
! 1 -f! '-'''''' " • '''•'• •••" '''' '"'.",'• .- .; ".\ ...:5•'-'- i' , ' ;.'P'4 'v., ' .:'7.._-:'.L1=. 7- •-• - :.
1 %;'''''' /',.•' . ,•es., T • c— -.—"2 . ..r ...7' — '11.• ..- •"•••—-
1 _ 4,-. I...=. •1-.1. ,..--... — E' 4. .
Li.... • , r.-.:-,-,,.. . • .....,--...,---,.....-.• •••-c--..„.. . . _ c_-:' Lz......---..:'
.., ..„ ,..•:;.1.'-' ,--,;:;.':'_., .-. • .... : N.,.... '....--__...,.....z.;-. . 4- ,- 4.1.A.79,-L---,...F._49-,: ....4: '•'2r.. . . ,1.
,t ft• ' ./''..;;:. n:.,- ...
1...it....„
-Pte.-, .. ,-. ,
. `.•` ''•••• - -‘ '¢. . - .-: ...4- ' •,' 1.:-..-:':':1:-•-• ."--!'---•,'2•-::" !--,7 L-7 q OK.' :7-• r• 1. '
d:. ,'
....\ ' .,.,.... • .4. —. . :,':•
'..... V..., :" \
.1.. i• s
•
. .:)..• . .''..=..: • -.—.'!...:—4...L7r... .---J , •jp.4 d ,..4. 1.*:-...-
•,"•-d•.1.-.•,...' 7 ..: :... •:='---- -.-.-_. .,! "1 =' •, qck-'n T-._.. —
,•:,. ;a• •• ;
9.i..-,• , .... -.. ... ........,..1, .. ...r 1-._,,
: ', 1‘. __ !. - i .:. ... c...... •, • -.. - r -,..r,.. ;---r..; . • .1.,,-,-.... fr----
• _ .._ , -,..-1 1 ..,...-4 ! -r-L,- ., ,- -•••- ,,"3
:LI-,.-;.'.'' . - —.
--- • ,' . ... '. .• • ' .--. • . . .. ..t -- .2-J •-•'7,i..:.p--17 :". .ril j..,,--
.. ..% f 1.•':" • . :.1$,...797,_9r--••_ - 4, . ..'.1;,2•,-1,.. ::, 4.-...,.-7••
. .1- -•- • ..1
_ . ..5, -.' -• " t i '.'• . ... ".: .r...'or 7--, ,,7-d_5-1
-. r•L., -.: .
I• 1 . . .: :....:•_,A ...!.7 7..1, !!. :_--.f •.F.?=.. — '- ;k
._• _
, ,••• --. ....- ......... _ • aL. '''. •.."=".' -Fr''''' ....±-.':- -:'''. •''.-. .••:'-- ' ::- .: ;7-2 7'"' , 7-..._ . :
PAGE 8 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.G
•
— .
— • . . -
. ,y.• ' -
• • .
." - 1:' -. .• '-' •
IIPTPAL=Iral Culf• ..m. ,
i-......
' -I''.--I.-\ . 14,MitiOirr ,MITI. 7.•?•r=rj,! W..r.," r r 4
. 1 il _.•._ _ 7 .4,,
, • •
• , ,_-., - -..._-. . .
. ... _ ..1s.e. •
..' •.,-..-1111ar"-' • . ' •:. • \ L.
• •
.._....,_.. .. ... . - • ..
. ,
.... . ......tgv. i .. _ . '
.. i
‘ Illtl; ' Lam I
• .; LK '
L. "EiIi - • ,
r ,.
.e . .....r.' • _ g4. • •• f..... „„_.
=._ ... .
.•. - . .. . : . • '
. .
• :
T .
I M.11.1•1,-.1
Mtiffr-LItmri , il 4
__...,...._ , .11
.....................,...,
! ,......
..,,,,.......-...
1 .-E.v.11frirtgal.
t:. .____.....,
-.; 4x-rem.wt.. I: ,.......____
.,--,
!
Er,1-2..m.--:-.E712zsre --/ 1; Fe.__ I 1 IvL.v1,7..4,r::-
::::,...,:..z.....•
' I
9
t
'r-m:114-1%,---tv.t-- i -- .45;.• 'al . — ----.‘ .
-.,---akr...7-..--- •:.:.. .-- .....si=i-,•:-;,_
t. -
,?,....":1,W2a' 71•1::
\ . I.:-..::: -',I1':i.I.'f L'7.7, .7.'.9'.• e..i...2. .f ....
.,
:,..:.:.F-_,7-.r:::.:;7z..7...--..1-.7......!..::,i:.7'•,:=:',%71.•:.-.IS I..
Ea:7*
••••,. . L.i:...:::: :;T.:::
...
_...... 1 1 --E1:737.1:2. r 'RY".."..E i F: P'.': n• ,.,7r 1
I . . , Z..' ! I-4.11,,,,II '',,rc117,5 1 ic-rI•
T ',C.-."..•,II.', 6":II•14 7:C,J,,rf i7:••••'.
U -- : ,I,III V I III:I;
-••••••-•- -a -1•••
..• --
.. ...
. -...... _.. •.•-
-••••••••-
•-•-•7..Z".... 1-.•,-e—"--17,s ,'"-- r....,":;.-7-"
1.Z151;t3-"1•1-;!i:..
•••-21i'r7g.rg1...+/21Z*..i".',7.,....7..:5.2....%-•-.
.it.
- ' ..-----'
-ii
:!..;:„ mamma.ku.vors
•,,...._,..L. 12P-Wil
.,.,._._,..._
.._....
:.'i..,:,,-.',7 1.7,=.,, -—-•-
i!..2,iirr....,, ,..
.L.ini'll.V`i ....N. F.E :.!..q,,)0,,,,": I
-
7 .W51,1. .. . Vig.b
''r-:.1 )1.. .1Z-r-,
(1,114•11 -. ..‘-n7..7.2...'..• • Li• 9;.• ---L- •
'.•. . .--. "'I "
. ..„ .
L i I I 'I•r‘.. .'' T.:.:Tr7.- i':.,:'a:r -
i.ti
'•• I '''.'. -AI-6 -
(-:11—.• —L 1.9- • mr_rt..K
! mi al
I '
,. :.•..„.: ....:. I ._. 1 . ,, __,_.,1 ........-,,
. --....r...—,- ..- ,, •
'9-)----lt 7..ra:=-.4. #1 I : I I
I I .7 4'
i .‘-"..,.-2.':"Z 7 7,1' .. .:.7.• i!..i.i-:••::
- 1 •, -------:„:„..1
... T.Fm.. L:". - :_--':-- • .'
1 .-,-,._ ses
• 7.1,111 11!1.1:111,2 AUL'.X qUErnakir =..a....... ....,
'7.7'=';•:::.-..:.77: L.. ::LT- ,' ...."..: .::•;'L' ,:'.. 72:
' hEll LIDELGEkl.L.Z I
•
-
iTruliol PIPE othoictiosaff KUM ,_........ ..___.. ...,_ .-.-
. .'7. ; 4A'::11'rY 9,1 bra 2:1,31.12.1.15 I '
• ',UMW
._-..
,......
;. 7' =..1-7-- ----77 . % •:,1+.s......"_:?-mit!t.
„.._
_
•
CLIelm KR
i.I4I,III,.....k.II•Lk......IMP
•
}4..p or ip4 ril.iLm
MiledirEC mairl.4 COAillt,NOS
-.-w--!:- °Nam MOST&waTlik P L.4
-,..41I 4 .--11F11E,lazo —
i I...A.• I I mq.,1 nu *III I 11.
. -- ---. -
PAGE 9 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.G
Exhibit B
Rid Documents to be added
PAGE 10 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.10.G
REV, 'WA
BID PROPOSAL FORM-A.TrACi-1MENT A
BASE BM
Anaohrms11.A to the Pi opssal cf
:Cow:rector's Name)
Pay Ilem la.4.-netea Dew'ptbn 1.1.11 Price
Q.1.1310
1 LE it Preperahor P Mobiligeeos,csmpfele asd in place
'a .Si -friL6LiM/4 d6.ars and
pe:lump Surn(not to exczed..5% !Stal Ea! SJ4Q.00 1/ana Cer
2 15'9 LF v;c1 a Tren:h Sae./system oS S-Pechac
.9 Sin
c an
omPlefe d in place for the.su-f.
Itcr ao:!ars anp
$ JICIL OP
per linear fool. 3 5'913,10
3 13D LF For.nalarFng 30-:nch reirforceo ricrae pima,
cxcavat'on.oac;dili and,ns1alrafion,corrohate in place
for ihepurn of, ;
ha/wired Ar do.iars,ond
g IA)
linear DO
_Lle_cenrs Der igb,e,0 s_
fOO!
4
EA. Tie new 3,7 reinforced concrete pipe to existing
r.r;Fp e ir .aie'or lhe ..1.11 or
xr_tr011ers a-c1
/]
eacs. OPP.00 5 eve
5
P'ug ebandaried 36" relfo.rced cora-vis pipe if,
ex!s1inE'storm san.ire!Manhole and a chanle fr.d,a
pressure grpvl andre reach kir pipeline,complete
the ssirr
t/±4 ±hi24 dollaYs and
,
.00 uarts
son. s s 50, it 40
1
.S For remowe aid prc:eo r fl bees,compiere fq pace
rcr The sum qtr,
Thre-Z--111 Llzbelei dollars and
7 OtiiF Fc r re.pu;r and rep :c^:%.rr,n
Cruosing a E. '
mwerio V.pc,kF:I,aria cump
alece for t
f oc_4narea
CA1r:1:i li."e21
az)
4
PAGE 11 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.10.G
kw. , ti 6
8 CA For Instaaabav,oa 5'X 5'skim sewer manhole,o npl
Ih ors r k m of !
'T ZiLil � dole and
march. ... ?.PM11
9 i LS For rum isreN and implarr}enaing Traffic Conarol Plan,
including tltwelapmerra or plan and elf Tabor anti
egulprn unplerne t,complete for
f C1FlJr dfllars and +i
cents per lump sum $ 1 : $
Total ease 8e1 $ '3 q c310 y
&knitted by:
(Contractor's Signanne) •
A-2
PAGE 12 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.'I O.G
9ID BOND-
PRIVATE WORK
For tine With The Arnaricao hriatituto of Architect*Contract Pto als Band
KNOW ALL 1W TH LSE PRI=S F h4TS.That we. IlevItis Caestrly&iion Co.
as Principal, hereinafter called the Principal,
and the Beridev Lniutiner Cempnny ,of Greenwich Connecticut ,a Corporation duly
organized wridet the laws of the State of Delaware as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held firmly bound
UT" Potter-sum Properties,Limited - al Obligee, hereinafter cai;ed tlic Obligee,
in the sum of •*w FIVE PERCENT OP TOTAL AMOUNT B(I)BY PRINCIPAL*** Dollars
{S ***t.9%TAB"** l I. for the payment of which sum well and truly to he made, the said Principal and the said Surety,
bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents-
WHEREAS,the Principal has submitted a bid for Storm Drain Pipe iatPass
NOW,THEREFORE, if the Oblique shall acecpl the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into li.Contract with the Oblige in
accordance with the terms of such laid,and give such bond or ponds as may be specified in the bidding or Contract Documents with good
and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such Contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the
prosecution thereof.or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give sttch bond ar bonds, if the Principal shall
pay to the Obligee the difference our to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for
which he Obligee may in good raid'.contract with another parity to perform the Work covered by said bid,then this obligation shall be null
and void,otherwise to remain in full roue and effect.
PROVIDED,HOWEVER,neither Principal nor Surety shall he bound hereunder unless Obligee prior to execution of the final attract
shall furnish evidence satisfactory to Principal and Surety that theme ing has been firmly committed to cover the entire cost of the project.
Signed and sealed this 'III day of September , 2021
lildij&e"Pfdli/2
32awles Construction Co,
`1 !}
_.4*•-ii
Witness {
Ra w: fi '.114-4 )1e , v,a9. Title
Bel' Insurance y
•
Wiliness f
{ By _
etty eeh Attorney,in•ratt
S-+41tSEEx icon ... "-- .. .. _—
FGa
PAGE 13 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.1 O.G
l'to.Jf#1-10234
POWER OF ATTORNEY
BERKLEY INSURANCE COMP ANY
WILMINGTON,DELAWARE
NOTICE: The warning found elsewhere in this Power of Attorney affects the validity thereof Please review carefully.
KNOW ALL MEN BY TFIES1E PRESENTS, that I3RRKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY (the"Ct pa iy'), a corporation duly
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware,having its principal office in Greenwich,CT,has made,constituted
and appointed, and does by these presents rxwke, constitute and appoint: Bryan Moore; Henry Reek..;Michael Hendrickson; or
Paarle a Ly1 le of Actium,LL.0 dbe Insurance dI L'onLLAgency of Trrtrlvr f.LCof Sant Antonio,TX its true and lawful Attorney-
in-Pact,to sign its name as surety only es delineated below and to execute,seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds and
undertakings, with the exception of Financial Guaranty Insurance, providing that no.single obligation shall exceed Fifty Million
and 0011.00 U.S.Dollars(U.S.550,1101),000-t}61),to the same escheat as if such bonds had heat duly executed and acknowledged by
the regularly erected officers of the Company at its principal office in their own proper pea sons.
This Power of Attorney shall be construed and enforced in accordance with,and governed by,the laws of the State of Delaware,
without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof_ This Power of Attorney is granted ptusuaut to the following
resolutions which were duly and validly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on January 25,Zq 10:
RESOLVED,that,with respect to the Surety business written by Berkley Surety,the Chairman of the Board.,C:=i:f Ex..;:t e.
Officer, President or any Vice President of the Company, in conjunction with the Secretary or arty Assistant Sewe.ta,Y are
hereby authorized to execute powers of attorney authorizing and qualifying the attorney-in•fhcr named thereein to exc^„tc
bonds,undertakings,nxognizauces,or other suretyship obtigations on behalf of the Company,and to affix the corporal:°
of the Company to powers of attorney executed pursuant hereto;and said officers may remove any such attorney-in-Inn and
revoke any power of attorney previously granted;and further
'RESOLVED,that such power of attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds,undertakings,recogttiaanceE,or
other suretyship ohligations specifically named thereon,and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner
7. and to the extent therein stated;and further
RESOLVED, that such power of attorney revokes all previous powers Issued on behalf of the attorney-in-foot named;. n^
- further
RESOLVED, that the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any
power of attorney or reaiificatiort thereof authorizing the execration and delivery of any bond, u-de..itn ing,recognizance, of
other suretyship obligation of the Company;and such signature and seal when so used shall have the::are force and effiteL as
though manually affixed. The Coltipany may continue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any
person or persons who shall have been such officer or officers of the Company,notwithstanding the fact that they may have
ceased to be such at the time when such instr miettts shall be issued.
v iI W[TNE$S WHEREOF. the Company has caused these pit-rents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its
cop slate seat hereunto affixed thisgl*day of Z -
Attest: f3erkl Insurance Compea;v
(Seal) 13y Ey
Ira .Led an Je fret
Executive Vice President et Secietoly u i esident
WARNING-THIS POWER INVALID IF NOT PRINTED ON BLUE'4BFLRKLI:Y' SECURITY PAPER.
STATE OF CONN ECTICUT)
) sat
COUNTY OP FAIRFIELD )
Sworn to before me,a Notary Public in the Slate of Connecticut,this `day or { ,by era S.',Edema
and Jeffrey M. Haller who are sworn to me, to be, 11'4 P.FceSItive Vice Prep t and !ecrelary, the Sarin Vice President,
respectively,of Berkley Insurance COmparNIARIA C.RUN EIBAMN /f !
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COlithltSSION EXPIRES otary Public,State of Connecticut
ap_PRl4ERTTFiCa�-rE
I,the undersigned,Assistant Secretary of BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, DO 1t1?RE.SY CI1RTlFir that the foregoing is a true,correct
and complete copy of the original Power of Attorney;that said Power of Attorney het net Neese revoked or rescinded end that the authority of the
Attorney-i::-Fact set forth therein,who executed the hand or and rig to whin is Power nt-Attatney is attach Is in fill]force and effect as
of this
l�ivcn under niy hind and seal of the Carnpaoy,this `Jae,''° •
(seg.
Mischa! 1.Her
PAGE 14 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO.1 O.G
IMPORTANT NOTICE
To obtain information or make a complaint:
You may call Berkley Surety Group and its affiliates by telephone for
information or to make a complaint:
BERKLEY SURETY GROUP
Please send all notices of claim on this bond to:
Berkley Surety Group
(866) 768-3634
412 Mount Kemble Avenue, Suite 310N
Morristown, NJ 07964
Attn: Surety claims Department
You may contact the Texas Department of Insurance to obtain
information on companies, coverages, rights or complaints at:
1-800-252-3439
You may write the Texas Department of Insurance:
P. O. Box 149104
Austin, TX 78714-9104
Fax: (512) 475-1771
Web: httn:/Avww.tdi.Ltatejx.us
E-mail: ConsumerProtection( tdi.state,tx.us
PREMIUM OR CLAIM DISPUTES:
Should you have a dispute concerning your premium or about a claim
your should content 'onr agent or P*rkipy Surety ryup ti t. 1f! tlh.
dispute is not resolved, you may contact the Texas Department of
Insurance.
ATTACH THIS NOTICE TO YOUR BOND:
This notice is for information only and does not become a part or
condition of the attached document and is given to comply with Texas
legal and regulatory requirements.
PAGE 15 OF 15 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 O.G
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER 2, 2021
ITEM/SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional
Services Agreement with Garver, LLC for the evaluation of the
Jasper Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station in the
amount of$109,600.00.
INITIATING DEPT: Public Works
STRATEGIC GOAL: Provide Quality Infrastructure
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Enhance Focus on Long Term...lnfrastructure Needs
COMMENTARY: The Jasper Water Treatment Plant has four high service pumps
which discharge treated water to the distribution system for use by the citizens of Wichita
Falls and its 15 wholesale customers. While those high service pumps have gone through
changes over the years, they have not been fully evaluated as a set of pumps against the
newer operating dynamics of the distribution system.
Over the last 20 years, the distribution system operating parameters have changed
significantly, with the addition of a new pressure plane and with Sheppard Air Force Base
being able to pull drinking water from a second location within the City's distribution
system. The City has also experienced two severe droughts in this time frame which has
altered water consumption within the City. All of these changes directly affect the volume
and horsepower needed to move water into and through the distribution system from the
Jasper Water Treatment Plant. While the plant is equipped with four high service pumps,
one of the pumps is oversized and is no longer used and a second pump is equipped with
a variable frequency drive but must be run at full speed to move water into the distribution
system. The other two pumps are across the line hard start and do not allow any flexibility
in the volume of water being pushed into the distribution system. The evaluation of the
old pumps will determine if the advancement in pumping technology will result in energy
reductions of the pump station and will identify improvements required to provide flexibility
in the operations of the pump station.
Additionally, Senate Bill 3 seeks to improve the electrical reliability to water treatment
plants by requiring onsite generators at certain locations to improve water service
reliability in the event of another catastrophic failure of the electric grid. An evaluation at
Jasper Water Treatment Plant will be performed under this agreement to determine the
size and location of a back-up generator for the Jasper WTP.
The evaluation of the high service pumps has been budgeted into the FY 21/22 budget,
in the amount of $110,000.00. Garver, LLC has been vetted through an RFQ for
Engineering Services and found to be qualified to perform this type of work for the City of
PAGE 1 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
Wichita Falls. Therefore, staff recommends award of the evaluation of the high service
pumps at Jasper Water Treatment Plant to Garver LLC, at a cost of$109,600.00.
® Director, Public Works
ASSOCIATED INFORMATION: Resolution, Agreement
® Budget Office Review
® City Attorney Review
® City Manager Approval
PAGE 2 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
Resolution No.
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional
Services Agreement with Garver, LLC for the evaluation of the Jasper
Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station in the amount of
$109,600.00
WHEREAS, one of the City of Wichita Falls' Strategic Goals is to Provide Adequate
Infrastructure; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to have a reliable pumping system to
distribute drinking water; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to reduce the amount of energy required for pumping
drinking water to its citizens and industry.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, THAT:
The City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement with Garver, LLC to
evaluate the Jasper Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station in the amount of
$109,600.00.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of November, 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAGE 3 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
Professional Services dig eeinent between the City of Wichita Falls and Garver,LLC:
for Consulting Senices for the
Jasper Water Treatment Plant High Seiiice Pump Station Evaluation
OWNER: The Cite of Wichita Falls:Attu:Director of Public Works.P.O.Box 1431,Wichita Falls.Texas 7b30?
CONSULTANT: Garver.LLC
PROJECT: Jasper Water Treatment Plant(WTP)High Service Pump Station(HSPS)Evaluation
TIMEIABLE: Time is of material consideration for services perfonued nnrler this Agreement.CONSULTANT shall
complete the scope of work in accordance with the schedule outlined in Attachment 1-Scope of Services.
P_ IMEItiT:
1.Payment for Basic Services.OWNER aerees to pay the following amounts for Basic Services rendered pursuant to
this contract. a total amount of 5109.15.00.00 subject to completion of the following phases of the PROJECT:
Iask Amount
Project Management_Data Review and Compilation S6.600.00
Jasper HSPS Evaluation S 103.(Y00.00
Total S 109,600.00
CONSULTANT shall invoice Owner on a monthly basis. Such invoice shall include supporting documentationreasonably
necessary for Owner to know with reasonable certainty the proportion of Services accomplished.
2.Payment for Additional Services. OWNER shall pay CONSULTANT for Additional Services requested and rendered
as follows:
2.1.Payment for Additional Services of CONSULTANT rendered under this Contract(-Contract'or -Agreement')shall
be paid as mutually agreed to scope and fee.Additional services shall be authorized by an executed amendment to this
aaeement.
3.Times of Payments.
3.1.Times of Pavznents--CONSULTANT shall submit monthly statement for Basic and Additional Services rendered.For
Basic Services.the statements will be based upon CONSULTANT'S estimate of die proportion of the total services actually
completed at the time of billing. O TER shall make prompt monthly pavinenta in response to CONSULTANT'S monthly
statement. Upon conclusion of each phase of Basic Services.OWNER:shall pay such additional amount.if any.as maybe
necessary to bring total compensation paid on account of such phase to the following percentages of total compensation
payable for all phases of Basic Services.
3.2. Past-Due Payments--OWNER agrees to pay a charge of 0.5°D per month. or the allowed interest according to
applicable law(whichever is higher)on all invoiced owed amounts not paid within 30 days of the date of the invoice.
calculated from the date of the invoice. In addition,CONSULTANT may.after giving 10 days mitten notice to OWNER.
suspend services under this_Agreement until the CONSULTANT has been paid in full all amounts due for service:and
expenses.
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: Russell Schreiber.Director of Public Works.City of Wichita Falls
BASIC SERVICES: CONSULTANT shall complete the professional services as Basic Services as outlined in Appendix
A-Scope of Services according to the iindustn-standard of care:CONSULTANT shall perform any and all services
required herein in accordance with generally accepted practices and standards employed by the applicable United States
professional services industries as of the efiectn-e date of this Agreement_practicing imrlar similar conditions and locale_
Such generally accepted practices and standards are not intended to be limited to the optimum practices_methods_
techniques.or standards to the exclusion of all others.but rather to a spectrum of reasonable and prudent practices
employed b4-the United States professional services indust}•:
Page 1
PAGE 4 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
GENERAL CONDITIONS:-
I.Te rot ination .R •• • • i n ate iiic:O.Li poi i I:1 7.-.CONL'IULTANT with the
undemandhir ilia ail SCrk Ein,ez this Agreement slim • vuL lied in such notice.
!Von(erm1m..t.on fur C )NSUI 1 I •14.n11.2;:p..1 do an Ir CON1,1.1 I 1 AN I •••• I:I I':.1.1";t, fI-II,1111ritir' Ctn.In
cveni ul ly [. 1 I A\11 sha 11 17%.:)L':,'I A\\1:R Jir_1".•••_ A.'...."-rvices properly
•-q...rormed un..1,..•[his A'4 i mem,and rrasoi nsis incum..1 )t• 1.1:1"‘•• 1•" `1‘. hen ire CON 511•I .A N`I receipt
01 ili.• ierrnmx on •oh.x., includinc „ill II LI iiiindlion for •Lunvenience,
CO\ \ 1 ho II .11 ow Lc providcd I h• ...II,11 •••...1% a:::oh.lcr3y l[ion.
2. t.ho[iv rs h in .;;;; via in len nce rif /The tirtutut,. II ,L.c.imen :Inc hil .1 n..I .1. .b.seMbled by
CONSE.I. \ Mu i•um.II ILI ". L moperi of \I n.i •mi r,.• h....I 10 OWNER
wick:1M reN[r .11\1\1.1.A1 \ mcl all node: "in•
OWNI11.1. r ••••. 1 "..Jei• :Hi( )\t,'11.1 1'..N I nun 711.: )11-..1111 h n
normJI:_mi rou • 0\•-11. I .10, I IiiII ,
license I.ii,111, •.1111.. 1;4 1."'L'I'. !Irk:01'7111% k 1,1 L11,..!CNiC:1
OWNE R ..h.: C. AK: ( \!4.1 I 11%.:I iI iL ulaconmiliunis J11 elJim,
dam agr.s.irn.1•• 11.1, 0.•• i•el. i•..11...cs ising out of change to,or re-wo2 olde I i L' or
any other proi.....1 1.E\\:\'[. fUtUR:1:1Diccil$Will he at the sole risk ofOWN 1 A. ON I A I
may make onrigi-, MA:uments for i[S.file.5 and re-usc i7-1.)----Jlion contained therein, CONSLILTAN I will
Ii1iiFi(1IFL proj eel R.-rant: ...ears after the OWNER hag made filial payment to the contractor and all other pending
IlliaMS are closed and ri 1c tlereof to OWNER ifrermemed.
3.Con trotting Law-This.A .0_111cm is performable and is to be governed by the low applicable in W ichira Falls.Texas.
Soli. foi ally au[ion arising.under this Agiccuicilt shall be in Wichita County,Texas.
4.Assign m en t°I-Contract-CON SULTANT!4.hal not Fimign, rxtransf:r ii ri eider ori men. in I. 1h:hiding,
but without lirnitailiNIS.,111011ies that may become due or wirmie 1 1 1
••1.1.•n••••••!•• :iJ••••
the other. Unless specifically stated to the coihmi:. cor•;...•11 m in •••.,.mco,cc.I :1••••i •••.ile.e.ise or
discharge the 455111gnor from any duty or responsibilii:, Nr7 hii . I ii.J 1. El", Ida IaI]shall
prevent CONSULTANT from employing independent eon•lilLin.....u-R- 'no emir I:1 Assist it in
the performance of services hereunder.
3.No Third-Party Renefiehtrie4--Nothing herein shall be consulted to Aiye in)'rights or benefits to anyone other than
OWNER and COlt‘ISUL.TANT_
6. Independent Contractor-In performinp„ s::rvicn under this Agreement. the relationship between OWNER armi
CONSIL.1 TA NT is that of independent con[me.• N17.Rond CONSULTANT by the execution o r this Agreement
do no change the independent corm ; '--I. I I AN"r. Ncs term or provision of this Agreement or act Di
CONS1,11.TAN r in the performance L.:1.11 . construed as makin .CONSULTANT or any agent,servant
or employee r4 CONS ULTANT the agent,sch., r lull .ET of OWNER.
7. Indemnity-CONSULTANT a2rees to release,indent airy,and hold the OWNER whole andharm less against any and
all third nany 10-1 elaims.su its.anIdgerions for any c Loans of hioclily injury or tang`ble property darnaze resulting froth the
ient Perform ance or negligent atlemptcd per romance of[his Contract This indemnity shall=aos-,0 to any claim to
Ili e extent to which CONSULTANT is prohibited from iiidmiiIiiig a governmental entity pursuant tolgy-Local Gov't
Code 271.90.4 oriIrIw
8.Govern men ial Function Clause-All parties agroc that this Contract is one wherein OWNER is solely performing a
governmental function.A31 parties expressly agree that OWNER is not engaging in any proprietor),functions,
Contractual Damages Limitation Clause-
9.I All parties agree that exposures for damages in this Contract am limited by agreement of the parties,and to
thwe damages authorized under Texas Local Government Code Section 271,[53.
No 2
PAGE 5 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
9.2 "N‘('1 I V. III I' I '..."‘,1)1"‘R i :IHLk FARTY SHALL BE LIABLE TO "I'HE. OTHER PARTY FOR
:N:si 1.11I N IA ) 'LI (iEKS OR V'DAMAGES OF ANV KIND REGARDLESS OF
TEE t" Ilk Ac. .I'* (INCH...1)I ...6 NEGLIGENCE OF ANY K]ND OR CHARACTER
INt. 1.1.1.11NL ( OSS. NEGLJGENCR).
9.3 NOTWITHSTA N111V \\v PIO)V1'.:10N iu 'HT CC\FR RY HEREIN, CONSULTANT'S
(INCLUDING i I ••. 1 "::•••••.I'I " I I .'..-•••••.1.•\I I EVI(.IATFS ANT) VENDORS)
Tr): i LEE AGEI 1.•••••.1 I '..I I VI I iu 1.) 10(1%0F
1.111 I A •ll•C•W.1)1 Ess or r
Nr.G1.1(.,I k]NF)on II kIZACTLP DI v..
:j ONSULTANT shall be CIL il loan equitable in the Agreement price arid project schOule for
iiiroets to the services resulrin:,:loin events heyorlit )NSULTANT'S control.
I 0.Wait er r ny action at law Or LU equityN necessary to enforce this agreement,each party nrees
v.a aro Th.r;s" ;':I V,ill not seek to recover its own ancirrirys' fees From the other party. CONSULTANT
Undids this I.•••., ;•. i ...vritnicnt Code subehap(et 1. g '27 1..1:C3(a)(3)priwitles that the total amount or money
awarded in an ili. i. :trought against a government entity for breach of a contract includes attorneys' fees. Both
CONSULTANT;Lii.1 A NBA expressly waive all statutory and other rights La mower fees pursuant to in §
271.1530)(3)and illi•cr law.
I I.Exhibits
The following r:s:Itibits are attached to and.made a part Or this Ago...einem;
Appendix A-Scope of Services
OWNER arid CONSULTANT,hy signing MI 5 Agreement.acknowlcdces that they have independently a5stircd them selves
and confirms that theyiridividuII> have 4;-xaiiiinal all Exhibits, and agrees that kill of the afurcsnid i•shibits shall he
considered a part of this Agreement and irgrees rn he hound to the terms,provisions,and enter requirements thereof,unless
specifically excluded.
Ateernanee of this proposed Agreement is indicated by an authorized agent o l'the OWNER sinirn,,ht[1st space prov idefJ
below.
IL Verification
(authorized official). 0/$06%do hereby depose and verify the irachilancss and accuracy of the
COMMIs of the statements submitted on 1116 cutification under the PrOViSiCRIS Of Subtitle F,Titic 10,Covernment Code
Chapter 2270 and that the company named
I) I)ac-s not boycott Israel currently4 and
2) Will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract;and
Is not currently listed on the State of Texas ComprtrolIers Companies that Boycott Israe[ List located at
htlps.:•'Icontiatiollu.,„Aa&govipurchasine,'oulllicationsiclivestinent,olip
Lta
Company Name
ignature of Authorized Official
PAGE 6 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
Title ofAuthori edOffieiul Date
This Agreement and said attachments may only be amended,supplemented,modified or canceled by a duly executed written
instrument.
EXECUTED,this the day of ,70 .
OWNER: City of Wicliitu hills,Texas CONSULTANT: Garver,LLC
Dacron Leiker.,City Manager n l .Olson,Vicr President
(seal) (sea])
ATTEST: ATJES
Marie Balthrop.City Clerk
FORM APPROVED:
Kinley Flegglund,City Attorney
rv4,
PAGE 7 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
APFENDIY A SCOPE or SERVICES
1. General
Gencral y, the scope of ..,: rvices rcludes an assiE;.s1r11,•it ci : e Jasper High Service Pump Station
it!SF ) :c ceterrnine re nmr ncrrcl imprrrve..ne.its frrcl.i. rq r 'is-is' wire-to-water efficielcy and
:3nFi:•]y n:ensity evalua'.an 7y::r;aulic own. :on au;it to tic:tc 'c;d pump station is included in the
~Lilt, and is 1112ct: :c-Jn, f:,,r Lie team to determine. non-ir'.asive energy efficiency measures
:r1-tt•1y1 These k E°;11 I t nip r2d.i•ntc the overall energy .ntensity {kWIMGD) and increase reliability
vl i"e .naintaining .pa rat n no.nrp i irr:e
2, Project Management, Data Review and Compilation
Garver will provide overall project ma.,';ay: rent services for the project, including the followAng-
2.1 Develop and maintain a project schedule, along with r-iur'.ily Jpd,L.tes Garver wi I advise the
CITY of critical path items affect-nq tr'e project progress versus the p,i.•ned SChe:ule. If needed,
rernediation items shall bc: ;r:nrifir::: 'ueveloped, and implemerte,c :r keep rho project on a
mutually agreeable schedule. Garvi~r will maintain and neon tot project erq nccriic budgets and
submit monthly invoices and prog.es1 pors based on progress of:.cik will
also maintain total project budgern that may Li'clude other parties invcl ed in the projr.c'.
2.2 Conduct virtual project luck-nf ,reeling. Following data acquisition and historcal data review,
Garver will conduct a kickoff meeting with the CITY The purpose of the kickoff meeting will be to
review the objectnres of the project. review the scope of work, discuss the schedule, highlight the
deliverables, provide a summary of the historical data received to date, a.nd update with any
further date requests;
2.3 Conduct up to six monthly progress meetings (virtual), if needed, with the CITY's staff vie
tel nferencelvideo conference;
2.4 Provide an agenda in advance of all scheduled meetings and provide subsequent meeting
minutes following the meeting;
2.5 Garver will prepare a Project Management Plan and Quality Control Plan to identify responsible
Parties and aid in coordination between entities;
2.5 Provide quality control of deliverables;
2.7 CARVER will provide the Owner a list of any requirr:rl r,a',A ne;:eSsary to pe:'O'T tho;a a r0 r a~ant
::rd the Oati.rcrwill prc;r'rlr: 'i: necessary data ( .i l2',/LR v;I' review rl'u tivtai a:le
',::.1 • 17i-. :.� , proects a r'.:,r x;~rl dn.^t.ri, ro II to 41 t::7•wl information is needed '~
-.re pun Ir�':r: ,. ,, i L,rvRVEI? .ai I nfornitation horn Cv:ner, <arcl ts:a,nt~r
shall provid:: n the tcr~r a:.
3. Jospnr LISPS I valuation
3,1. .3ybiem Model
Garver hie existing water distribution system model to add the Ke I West h cvnturl .STararfr:
Tank jES l r;ny other model updates will be considered extra work. Gar,°ter :i'il 1.:I
distribution system model to develop a system curve envelope for 11•o Jas::ur I I. f,S seed cr hotel
scenarin.s and r:' . tdditional scenario representing, conditions (l,ii•ig the existiry �r rp :t st •i T 7
updated ri r e I zilsa be used to develop HSPS System curve to identify operating cci"ri tr:>ris I:}r
new, more effigy::t it f;tin,ps.
Deliverables iJlrJ-ated distribution system model.
Appendix A-Scope of Services 1 of 12 2v';'•;ryit. .l^.
Wichita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
PAGE 8 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
3..2. r I v.:7Jni11c•1
Ga-'.cr wi I c:re (1; May of field rvcsticatiari to r;:ka uale. the existl^g Jasper HSPS and
Mch7r C.or:'c:I Center (MCC:
Th.i desessrner: p lime enlyl•'oers (ts-Ocess §r1f:t;hF,riC: aild
Instrumentct on comp I:'.rig a '.r'3a.1-1 assessment for condi..Oi-based te'ri elc.,g with verbal and/or
written hlSL r perspect;vc"OM the CITY for each, Ike-T.
Deliverable: Draft Field Investigation Techriic.a Memorandum.
3,3, Field Testing and EEM Dove"ca^nort
Garver will perform wire-b-wate' ertz ercy testing on the Jasper H .'s _s autallcc,below
■ Jasper High Service Pump Station
a. Duty Operation-Pumps chlorinated,treated water from the clearwell to the
distribution system that is floated by an elevated tanK system
b. Number of Pumps—4
c. Variable Frequency Drive(VFD)—Pump Nto. 3 is on a VFD;others are constant
peon
d_ Operational Notes 1 Testing Considerations: Pump No. 3 is'RFD driven but can
only rum,ao'.w'r' tc approximately 1;141k. Pump N . 4 is out of service,evaluation of
Pump No c will be based on Pump No. 3 perforrriante,
Rev.! lestiriq will renal ,;iir;rall pumping efficiency otherwise Known as wire-to--water efficiency,
and encrq'.r iri:cnyity ,A'Ith ieeoect to energy consumption and demand, KVVIING, and kWTtGD
respectivefy Additionally. e fiUIka-derifled system curve will be developed for one and multiple pump
cpe'alicr I ti halo `.'Lritiec system curve is essential n calibraticnfvalioation of the system curve
. ....... tr;ri ;nc h',.r a.,lic +-rbodel, which y used to verify proper design 2rid operation Of existing
pumps till/,°tin replaccncrr p.imps It also helps reveal potential EEMs The annual energy savings
from me Err•:1:, iii l I '.;I ;;r v ,' kM, along with the peak summer water demand months, will be
estimarrid ::. 'J irg t' e rvsu is of the fiele testing coupled with the nrstorical billing [lath. pi,nir annual
and the energy r_bicron anticipated iii lie suggested EEMs
Garver's r!eCtriciair wil he I.tit zed to acquire Ile ;~Ic^trial data for the w_re to-water efficiency tests.
S recir,:;illy I ne-to-line ,_It-ci , ^hose ampe'a a arid phase power factor .Jtilizing an approved power
gi.allty monitor. Durirg the 'skirt:-tea-.aster 'gists. Garver will collect the hydraulic data, consie:nq of
u uc'on water level ^1rfi:: I:-r i pressure, and flow rate,while thp., collects the electrical cat..
3otn electrical ar'd hydrajl c :a'a will be simultaneocsly and •_r:cr_:c` r Ga•.de/s I Iyc,r,itlic
Efficiency Tool to -eyeal the wire-to.Ye iFe c:ffl•::Ils l:;y end energy 'intensty and kWh,MG.
The purpose n' 790 tests iS to captu'e 'vs s pernpirg ir'forn-ation incie live cf 'Iorrral pumping
operation,while.a'so capturing the historical nigh a'ic ID*apt i "ci lie purrlp so a frela veritica system
Curie can be Oovc:lc.:ped. Collecting bookend operating :;:lily; also., ;3 lows for more accLra: casetne
energy calculation if historical operating speed and/or flow is available.
While performing the wire-to-water tests. Carver will assess t+.hich of the following EEMs may,or may
not, be pertinent. EEMs may include the following no-cost, low-cost and hrgher-cost suggestions:
Appendix A-Scope cf Services 2 of 12 2OWoir;24,7
Wichita Fails Jasper I-I SPS Evaluation
PAGE 9 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
• Addition of air release 1 vacuum valves Far"air locked pipes within the plant site
• Pipe looping, upsing,or adding parallel pipe for hydraulically choked networks
• New, more efficient pumps)
• Instrumentation upgrades
a VFD I Motor configuration upgrades
• Modified control descriptions
Existing flow, level,and pressure instn.imentation will he evaluated :u inq the scoping visit.This scope
of Work includes rental Fees for a transit time portable flow; rw:ter excludes any rental fees for
instrumentation meters such as pressure aaug or level s: .i.•rica,
3.4. Energy Savirus Calculations
Garver will calculate the overall pumping efficiency 0:0 and energy intensity for each of the pumps
based on the "as-is" testing. 1 le testing may not reveal actual puma conditions during all operating
scenarios experienced, but ef*crts !All be tacrn to make sure the"as-is" testing scenario Is indicative
of normal operating conditions To establish bookends on the field testirrq the lowest historical VFD
speed setting and highest historical V F p speed setting over the past two(2)years will also be tested.
The estimatec annual energy savings in kWhiyr and lbsC.Q y'rra calculated by comparing the existing
wire-to-crater efficiency to a higher wire-to-water effic.e:irry '.till} that can be ach'evec '-om a pump
system that incorporates an EEM resulting in a flatter system cure IJl:nrately. his resu tr in Ioa,arHP
pumps to deliver the same operational flow with less total boos ;Ti Tn.r•difference ir IP';r r�r$rC ti
to kVrJ) between the existing and proaosed pump syston : •1'I. histOin
to obtain estimated kWhi'/r savings. Historical rurlli•ni CCCt.rGt,j . :I'fetion5 crc pe-'ici-red b'.
comparing historical annual kWh taken from monthly 1:is and fiend kW obtained frorr wv re to water
tests;adjustments to the annual •untirne are made accordingly. After determining the€Stirs,tad k'd'Vh.ryr
savings several other metrics can be carculated as detailed in the Deliverable section below.
The 5-yr rct:.rn r nvnstrne:*t (RGI) cost is an important metric presented ir the sr,rnmary table. It
estimate s CI..: ,ar, .,:.ge nl . .i:>ital investment required bran EEM implementation that will resuul1 in a
5-yr y .I the i..rsC 2 yr. and yr savings estimated in the wire-to-water efficiency tests.
This al.},'.•s the City of Wicns-.. rr'Is to estimate the magnitude of a capital investment For am hEM to
recove- ;.~ '{ n,.Ipr.iriiricI ove"-rric I-is type of simple ROI investment analysis excludes:
• tth't:. r I ..IC
• Eli:..,,.. ..,7. volatility
• Var, i ,j f�.ai i;: rurltin'1pS
• Adc lional kVidlysiTarta ibsCO:'yr '61:I I'Igls for any EEP'1s that may result in reduced flow or total
;:;na ri I evcl.while meetirc c:-:stile c.peratianal col-v.-Ants
ECts'r: '.,II br: tYesertej as bulleted rcr.J rrierrdjt a-11 ir the detailed calculation sheet for each pump
tes1E J 's pro .ented in ATTACHMENT B Gar•1.7:r-„si,mr.• that the pumps evaluated In these tests are
prcpe Iy sized with respect to EEMs Garver suggests shall not compromise
th parameter
Appe•.d x A Scope a'Services .. :if 'i 20WD5240
VVi htorollsJasperI:SPSEa laa';nri
PAGE 10 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
Note All savings are ccr •i•,,;• . •.I ,l.:• e s:i•rate ti•'d z1.e not guaranteed as there are many scenarios that
may influence the tri i•,.:r i,a:rl os unit cost of electricity and demand charge volatility,and
require a more deteiee j desigr- 7. r:: ft.. • i.:FEIVI suggestion
DELIVERABLES:
+ Wirt::-7•::•-<<ra,er test input ailE o,.tp,.r d:.ra table(Included in Attachment A).
▪ Field-ver ticed ^ystem c,r,r., su;:n nposed with pump performance curves with respect to flow
vs.total nee::, xirb-° ..,;tjl r eihcioncy, and true power(Included in Attachment A).
• 5 year ROI timeframe associateU wri each pertinent EEf Th s takes the estimated blended
arn.ia, energy savings from each Et,l "i. :la I.. �,• 5 •.:• nine which EEMs rank
the iiiyhest:=ric,l the estimated capital button: r :• .,;i,° :li. , ' ;i •,.JI.
• Sr.rl1:171A'.f:�i;l 4r.Jgested EEMs(Example in:.rcl.•.I i rtu l i r. ;t 13)
+ EEfv1s Worksn44!dentifyrng suggested Fri `sl:. [la,and held investigation TM
3.5. Refine'EEMs
The focus of this task will be to shortlist and refine pertinent EEMS developed during the field testing
that result in more efficient pump operation while keeping in mind the EEMs must not compromise the
operational intent of the pump station. Hydraulic focused EEMs will be developed for the pumps
evaluated, Other EENIs may range from mechanical,electrical and control improvements to evaluating
if the NSF'S is on the most economically advantageous rate structure.
Garver will review the current energy procurement, strategies and electric utility billing rates to identify
alternative strategies and b 11'7g 'ales that would reduce the overall ercrgy costs Tnis will include a
review o`thc currc.n" utility ti Ming rate to identify oppo-.unities to reduce energy costs by managing the
:lent s demand and the pole -hal benefit from participatirg in ut lily party load curlailmvnt programs.
plant hillin',i ra'e'v il' be ncorporated in the belief].Nv.gluatiori to accurately account FIN Me demand
eoHig. a qe ctfscr.s ton each modification.
IE ti .veil be developed to a concept level, but with enough detail to provide conservative
fig, "roc° :: rat estimates required fora simple ROI analysrs. Where applicable. concept level
qucta.ic:rs will be requested from vendors to provide andfor install said EEMs. If vendors are not
responsive m a hrnoly manner, Garver wi'l use best ludaemerit in arriving at costs
8.6' Generator Evaluation
Garver will review critical e'lecfn.. -1 leads ssociotcd r,th emergency plant operations at the Jasper
LVTP. prep{ a fare'iminary i;(.1:: aril provide a planning-level opinion of probable
nst:.,vticr CC575 for an emergency ba: k,ip gerervtor. C:a7verwill develop two(2)alternative backup
gerc:•ator uri:.: rcJ scenarios, inducing:
1. Full p ant capacity (22 MGD)
2. Crtical r:•rrergency operations (-10 f IGID) including pumps, fillers, backwash pumps, and
clarir ei in.xers.
ciari.er will also evaluate alternative equipment starting options to reduce overall electrical load.
rnclud ng soft starts or VFDs and provide a recommendation Carrel .x i l ii veicr.conceptual site plans
Appendix A-ScoPe of Services 4 of 12 20WU6240
Wichita Falls Jasper HSP,S Evaluation
PAGE 11 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
and one-line diagrams The generator evaluation will be Included in the Jasper HSPS Evaluation
Report.
3.7. Summary Report Technical Memorandum
The engineer will develop a technical memorandum {TM) documenting the protect background, field
investigation, field testing methocology and calculations, field test results, EEM recommendations,
supporting theory and a simple ROI cost analysis for recommended EEMs, and HSPS evaluation
recommendations including budget-level opinion of probable construction cost. Potential EEMS may
include:
• Installation of air release valves on"air locked"pipes within the plant site
• Pipe looping, upsizing,or adding parallel pipe for hydraulically choked networks
• New pump impeller design andtor new. more efficient purnp(s)
• VFDtmotor configuration upgrades
+ Modified control description
DELIVERABLES:
i Draft Jasper HSPS Evaluation Repro t
■ Draft Jasper HSPS aPS Evaltation Re poi t l='iork,Snnr=p
■ Final Jasper I ISPS Ev-d.i�i o r hcpr��
4, Project Deliverables
The foilowi ng will be submitted to the Owner. or others as indicated,by Garver
A 1 '..r f,die Draft Summary Report TM+electronic{PDF)
I; 1 c fry oP:'te I- nal Summary Report TM+electronic(PDF).
5. Extra Work
T tc: fAr;..iiing items are not included under this agree=nerd ::it :r be considered as extra work:
r5 l edesign for the Owner's convenience or due to ::ioiceC conditions after previous alternate
cVachon anchor approval.
[3 Preparation or partic pation in addition r7 c Cirri. _:t•i i}:.rl r :rr associated utilities, beyond
what is described in the Shops rif
C. Develop wr tten iria:vial beyond :'r_3` p-ovided in the S:c:pt: of Srr4iues, including technical
•rtei o'.rda. reports. or other docu t-e•ts related to Ho,- \Nu=<.
L7. `ri,ili rt tl City ;r Waite F rl',k Jasper HSPS t,a col ect data or information not available or
c11'r",i t Irma i::H:. by the Owner.
E. Piro=:irle s-rpp oriental info'rnatian beyond that E•: i al• ; . pruv ded pursuant to the Scope of
Ser.irr
S,=t,rtil' tt r,, de ive•ables it acdition to those. I starl I t:rr r
Hie 3°' et LIT; L.t I tic i reloca:Cr,• cif electrical modifications.
H of I=SP S bi loins :crane.
I. Dos:far, i rrc,i°i:: aids crfu atir r rega rc_:a for^=r;i7°r: ri f.1 °`to;iflcations{as needed).
J Per in t.rig of any E`_r 1s wit I.r,cn
K. L3is=:rbution system';rode.' upaal t=trey'ori t•le o;.lortion of Kell West EST.
Appendix A-Scope of Services 5 of 12 2 Mi't16240
Wichita Falls Jasper HSI'S Evaluation
PAGE 12 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
I I' nsient analysis of existing andlor recommended pumps.
lad C,urstruction materials testing
N. Roouireid instrumentation provided by Garver in addition those defined herein.
O ;; rvir..r. iftea vanstruction. such as warranty follnw-up, cperltic ns support, coordination, etc.
I' nc i twnwl site visits, beyond what is described herein. or is required to perform the work within
Kr:' pi:'1:}rr"I .rice indicator(KPI)evaluation and dashboarding inteerabon.
rxl ri'An k f:il he directed by the Owner in writing for an addition fee as agreed upon by the Owner
6. Schedule
Garver shall becir work under this Agreement within ten (10} days of a Notice to Proceed and shall
Complete tho.v. .rk ri -1:vordar1Ce-with the schedule below:
f5r t�se 1.•:ec.ricttior Calendar Days
llat vquesb'Review 14 days from start date(or Owner-provided data).
Field Invesrigeti.n 30 dtiys trcm receipt of data
Field Testing & I 1'i H'eve.oc:r r;_rit 30 cabs from receipt of data
Energy Savings .s�... ,: ,: 21 crVs from Field Testing & EEM Development
EEMs& Field ',Thrkshop 14 tis' s from Energy Savings Calculations
Refine EEMs 14 d_v s from Suggested ECMs Workshop
Draft Je$per NSPS rnmary Report 30 dn' n from Refine, EFtyts
Draft Jasper HSPS Summary Report 14 r.1-xtw fi:lrir 11i it pe HSI'S Report
Workshop
Final Jasper HSPS Summary Report 14 days
Appendix A-Scope of Services 6 of 12 20VW06240
Wichita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
PAGE 13 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
ATTACHMENT A
- Sample Template for Wire-to-Water
Test Input Data Table
Appendix A- SGcpe of Services i'of 12 :OME324I:
INichla Fa'Is Jasacr f iSPS Iv Ii.i tiori
PAGE 14 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
F. da
t p
3 it1. t 4N .. iaiig 454 ... 74 . 91 ,i
y 4 67 4 a
r, q
ligg44, N -_
of t N v
C 3 r' ° c
is. 7
a :� E
1112itirrili 4 d 1 1 1. 8 F; R - - v, E.,, i 1 i 9. i PI 4. 6 d i
'-y C n. is = __,.,..t d,
, a E, n -, i lL' 1 S
Q W
9P 1 c m
py ,
2. , ... I
nN L .
_
—, � y IN
_ r
cep ../ : 9 . r- .
z ▪ A N iel �' ^I Yi H 4 '4 N -1 Ya —
a, pp.,pp ▪ ,5 -a 6i -J
E CZ
y m 1
U - h .n i3 I� # ri N s 'h G4 4] Pi it d7 eg}
^ 1241; 1 .k
= at 5 = _' J M1sf El' n - P' 4 'i ill
n $ q Al 4
.i q. :.7 , m -ti I k „ _ .qq F II .1 II+ 1 .1 I II. 1.• + 1_,a.y�
- ..�
t r - F E e 1 J
� t � C �J o a' _, } 7 � n at i
ra L „ ci 2 $ m -2. E t n = o S g, g m c
EL a 2 e' y E Li ! x .. $ rc'
o � � y c5 0 �, � o {
g
i 1: 1 f Fl . .i.
Appendix A-Scope of Services 8 of 12 2$},80624O
McIuta Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
PAGE 15 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
ATTACHMENT T B
- Sample Template for Wire-to-
Water Test Output Data and
Summary with EEM Suggestions
Apoe-idix A-Scope of Services 'of 12 244006240
Wichita Falls Jasper HSPS Evaluation
PAGE 16 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
WIr YV;dmer Efllderl[ro 7e3S I' r 7dertl�al iurhdn■Irtir SFFrirFn
GARVER
n..aInllWsl ky Eris Oulc PE Ni.4,rF.x.P.p.r.r arhlrh eased and kLrF speed.'2ow tYwiillarr wakseem,al.in I I Bog.JY.Itt.Wna.
cl,..:, LW4 Fj F the left of I*pmnl+aberat••g spied and Icle.i Ln tw,„em ed
LcaNlcn WIT T,B,•Ifi,P.'p 2 lha+wrinsd cpwallyd iaW )1 p?rd)nrl ceder pahrn-min:ray;re•Arcn a,11:s Si fndwa*a: 11.1.1
P.ddr. rakl,lar[-.s oo7.7 9 iral,.rla ucr•p.eh,[I.Le ri,l.,-n:u•r•rn.7.1 RILrry eke v;c i. >fi2 U e%,rp.r<I ul 4F0
L Uric so.,,lca Rrn.,dn.pant ir.•0440 spied WO a+ti:.:r, .:.i+a eve u,„a.In rwrlir L`a u.m-furl.-ry imply!
Ta.t 1 a_....._
-dele a lrtyfFi
ralr„In,.,Ile.k�r.,l%7 FIOT ej_rFR
„14`P iYA'A, -n ol,ro.r' W.1','iI ll,lA LtiCC C!.L_,XV.r4L1=A.L.JLA%Ylfl
WI)Speed M.y• 'µ Nnnr4t•rr 1>r.,;,eslei,n I Iin1Jrlcal hwJtmn ilen..,I•Kr-
Fen wan.DPW anio ihl,OM 27 VaiI. Iva•t.• 403, U.,na•+d AA,W,"U.ne;t.Slyl l^
ml✓n.rre Presmeelpos3 pi is 'tort Erj1I r F,-: ne4-7 Ipxukal Ste C.J.,s-L,clr1,,I=ES= Z jy
Fln.,eon Eapplar lotro.o .742 '•tit„FP.I.'I•ts• tfd5.7 Me_Cnrrlr_For Fume ChL117,tet?•Ff•r
PS Firm Ir,rr:05114 P.IrmJ.Qeia e2d2 n.�{4F=E dNtCaa; darkllyh �L.rc9d
hhh
▪ F,P.ID pp-.I Cm-it p 1.rII. 24 irtmarcye Pt,ai L 111 1 npl-1,,, glad Demand Ow hteebkhY(SONO
o,F,.n,,,L. II,III;,2, ]F J 1peri®r4ri,LSfril la.,pl-Ir- ill_i T eieiie rv.xe,AgNt(Nwj-'Plano
- E'aY
:cia.'•,7,9E-ill Co...,Leal 24 nrrlygR r4Ttiri 1l A ter.Ill.-.Ir• IJ4.1' N.w.sel-w 0914-
▪,.TUF,t r.Sr,.n awrralaeiS'i.6sta it r +.'ad-Jln}s.r ri I-'iil'Ia..- FLtS New PINNY R k I, z
int.,,n, :f,,,t,xsrrl(pr.l"Lcul aXI rn,.w!t..Lmlgn.1.TO.'= PAtil ravinji{kwl= -,.r.r,= g
t;:e.rrsi-nn dw„ffl 1.ed.r,1 nab eywerfaoonek..,'A-pr,. eel 1n'n•gii Ihwhfvrl F'rr,., ;y W
S,II.II I1RJii I.11dl.•hl aL evert.FI. Lc Keis3-pi.• Uhl Cie*Lminco*lvi a•rx,' o-
"mini C: Fie Ir MIA IN.TM. As Asy.pnM o'Fa lai Fn•pF• 3..330 oltu I n.it Ikwl,m.,t2p• 3 S
f'f I[text"rr w.r.u,ArII). NA,'Not✓tit4..rtd , n.'r7 31 INWh.m7.rl='
vw.fxw.4er Flr.(%t-w zw; dd)7i •3 Yr Skills Po01..en r.k.L.01=
A cap,L,l ee:e eF,pr.e,ncr aiel.,h,..al,.a,,,
a,.ocs.cuca•5.Implc yr Bui,.rnh r.duwd snare rest.
Appendix A- Scapa of Services 10 of 12 201, '062,10
Wicil'd.Falls i+SPS Fvd'uotlor:
PAGE 17 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
W!tri•2!W3tter-fmfffll:lwilc test for Vertical Turbine Pump 5ysae.rt
QAe VCA EEµs:11 ki.{w•hc..l I`Mr nr.,i r Y.lily rhlrrl:IhF"1 IM1S'rirOrl I.,,iiiNt Ier tb.:,Pme....Awl:.tpi.Y:1'19999i u.11•Ora
PIWilrI*d hy:Erie 6a1•,PE 40iiri71l.:,1uall.oLnnrlrll lb lini;..II IHAI.N;u.rnpl''il I...v fl.11 15'I II]I.51II0,11a.11n.iu Iuu-=w U,r au III.31.11iia ca..
44nl: Pielue►h Ie.parleme o 13p1 ioulu..o,..,?•.N 1.If.Ip%:r I',rp I c !moors rr.nu I'rruq lo.1."uuih Silr-v w.r',a lul P..np 1..r
Faca.lan WI?Ti rr.ah,Fvmp! luaus.).1 1Q 1:p1;mu°Y All,lone IIM a..tr-,ar1 COO rnallm MILL lion wwn.ls milrh a...u.irn?2.31 flu wow rh9r.11!rtn.rlh •
—
i{IrtrCN. p oo:n0l.r-9;,n99911..99.,'111111,rJrrrl.r a,mow h«vlw M 1'31.71...,n lit rhr,to r.. IryitmOfl't`.li inu^Ihi5:8fr111.iaer,;
tI!Lirlr S+Vwlet Praritlm. P923.9c•h Pc'. ;',I LL I'f builri•r,11i1Y W.IIIr4 IA J-1•l.iran IA ram II II,...p air nnlrminm;nl....Eros from rasa idlnl Wish, ',..sl Il u'rnlrLw
ltWilp Ga.it%9%.
I,'Y G.91no1.cw.•...19i94k 1 tiara wrnlrve.l
____.................... .....
+�
WTP Transfer Pirmp it?field 4-P!ifie,(k Sy3tCrn liend C1;rve
1211 r 1{E055
v Ir I :. iIl 1. , II ,.I?
EOU i —I 'l epin
hr) 1 Kik
H NI% = C m tlYrp
—.—71xn rpan
d —..-rayy ri .
4f 1
. 38% 'limp,E.fficieriV lolly I
-----__mi
}� 4Ciror riff
a aus
0 s0O3 mCIlol0 V.A.I4 24030
fl.:wtipprn)
WTI)Transfer PIA mp Ft2 W.2-W Efficiency and kW Trends
latio Alm,
_heti . 74.49E . kwilrigd
WA) E{k.CN6 • kw] Lc1rl
0J,i}1�2kWJn n1 18'Ieyr•.i
i {,Ci.s1 41.014 i
a- ?0.[Nb W•7 4'f FIT
.4 .. tit•, i1� iodrri • W-2-41 91 1R'IruPt
3
2110 i' I p :..I ,I
36.6% Poll.IkVry
no 00% Uriear fkw/imlildl
350€J 40.10 4 I) SCWcli 55(15 MD) 6500 70[ll Trim Min .1 rn Poly.9tinr•2 w ill'
P IOC4 I$l}II'il
Appendix A-Scope of Services 11 of 12 2CW(.62'1 0
Wichita Fads Jasper HSPS Evaluation
PAGE 18 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H
EEM..nrre-,05,0PuffiDifte 4a190 level incleerwell hr it ft'mid sl ul 4 r*.imprampw.t.m+elf+r.+knty
SUMMARY
rom&EN to 75Yi
Annual Paw.+.Cpnsurnpl,an Say.nss kvalnrwr, ]85,-0[U Sat inlc■O&mo J Op illlld MV.l r urvas+ar each hlsiarica I ami aaia
dill%mawilawer Wings.LW 95$ %,I Oartbbsad'anflaldNYPCurves`oreachleiSnor!calOp*esta.pool.
Aws Wlnitr Power$ay.A .kW 65 'aarn¢s are based on field•'::ei++i':5':n rail,,I. no r av-da'o pa,I.
Anna.'PCM,wr d91!6a Estimage Intl iidlr'R Clfdn4m0'1n I WhI and demand l4Wl charges
Utll+ty Rebate$ D $#13Oj LW l a,r4w1 CG1r+�l summer mont5s
Eft Ip!F1'.S 195,900 Ptr invoke toinsinIEW.i
q.rna2eRQ.I.Yrp
Egai, ri 1OOW LueitEMMY PerYr .14 M SJ71965corikld}li
lbrhO'r. 3Cp-11—..I1ed RI:021.0 dg;,67� per Urktell States Crtriry l niarm :ian Ad minilL.ti ar9{ gaff CO201Wh1
1gu.v KIES Drr.nn ?L r,s1e,rnl iG1,71.d Per LM.rted Ste des Ent rry IIIe+l.Arlminlabra tlorl
-_.. Few..664..5;..ars3Wmpl+an CQ.2 tail.#/yr 61.3.2 L_ fee UII.I ItStier,Entrly iriot[nek+[n ddministtat'ion{19.-0kaa CD21$a I sai G.irnrcl9
Appendix A - Scope Of Seni2ceS 12 of 12 2CooVD6240
Wchifa 12I S Jasper HSPS Evaluation
PAGE 19 OF 19 PAGES
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.H