Loading...
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - 02/14/2018MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION February 14, 2018 FRESENT: Jack Browne , Mem6ers Lynda Cannudy , Rick Graham Krystal James, Vice -Chairperson MlaRe Haney • Steve Lane , Alternate int Rodney Martin, Chairperson Travis Witt . Altemot= #2 bobby vviliteley, Council Liaison • James McKechnie, Senior Ass.Stnnt City Attorney , i_ey.J Dept Paul Mentes, Assistant City Manager . City Staff Dana oclloen ng, Community Development Director Karen Gagne, Planning Administrator • Matt Pi�uuty, Planner Il , Fabian Medellin, Planning Technician iAISSENT: Jerry Beaver Anthony Inman • Cayce WendGburn Mark McBurnett . Ex officio I. CALL TO ORDER Tice meeting was calle0 to orner by LRairperson, Mr. Rooney Marlin, at 2:04 p.m. Chairperron Martin proceeded to maka the following comments: a. This is being teluvisud live un Channel 11. It v„ill be splayed at 2:00 p.m. daily including Saturday and Sunday until the next live meeting is aired which will be the second Wednesday of next month at 2:00 p.m. M. Motions mane oy trle Commission members incluse all staff reccmmendatiens and de,,elupmental raquirement5 listed in the staff report. Ar py deviatio, ,s will be discussed on a ease -by -case basis and voted on aecardingiy. c. Applicants and citicens whiD wish to address the Commissiun or answer questions from the Commission members are asked to please speak into the micrcphvne at the podium. P R Z CnMM Sq Q F Ai -7;_. t Feb-uary 14, :018 This meeting is being t -ped and there ic no microphone to record Gtntements made from the audience. d. Please silence all cell phn_n-c during the meeting. If if is necessary for yoL to have a cell phone conversation during the meeting, please use the hallwav outside this room. fl. 2LIMI Ir r-AURAcdTQ No one from the audience wished to �tldrnee the r'ommiecin_=. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ms. Krystal James introduced a motion to approve the minutes of the Januarv, 10, 2018 meeting. Ms. Lynda Cannedy seconded the motion. The minutes were aporoved with a unani=n_uc un - fa - IV. REGULAR AGENDA J. r'ase C 1 R-06 R --quest for a r'onditional Use to allow a carport in the required front setback in a Single -gamily s De-idential (SF -2) zoning district. This request iQ for 217 Loch Lomond Drive. Ms. Krystal James made a motion to approve. Us. I yndn r' -needy c_c^_nded. Mr. Matthew Prouty presented the case to allow a carport in the reguired front setbacL at 217 Loch Lomond Drive. The property was Inrated in a Single-Familv 2 Residential (SP -2) zoning district. The requested 20 ft. x 22 ft, carport would be In_rated -ppr=xim-rely a ft. frn_m the front property line, and 7 ft. from the interior side property line. There were b pr^_pertiec luithin 200 ft. that had a carport within the required front setback area Staff notified �Q p,,reel-; E responr+ed in fav -r, 0 in opposition, and 1 mlith no ouinionlundecided There were no responses received frn_m outside the nn_tific=tin_= area. Mr. Prouty stated staff rarommendPd approval of the carport at 217 Loch Lomond Drive. Chairperaon Martin asked if the applicant ►vas in attendance and wished to speak, and there wf2s no one prac_nt. Chairpercnn Martin asked if there was anyone else in the audi2nn W!2= fetch -r[ to cpenLe and there vara Done. Chairpers Dn Martin opened the motion to die^ucsin_= -=n-ng the rammiceion, and there was no dis�uss:on. The motion was taken to a vote and carried un-=imn_u-ty. 2. Case C 1$-07 Request to Allow a 14 ft. Redur`tion in the Required Interior Side Setback for an enrn-sacry ctrurture in a General Cnmmarcial (GC) Zoning District. Case Withdrawn try Appli^-nt Due to nitorntinna t� Site Plan. P 8 t C0MMl551ufG PACE .; February 14, zuI8 Public Hearing on 212 Valley View Road Rezone: Chairper�un Martin opened the public hearing concerning Me rezoning of 5.66 acres of land, 212 Valley Vi -w Road, from Limited Office (LO) to Limited Commercial (LC), He opened the meeting to cumments from the public. Chairparsun Martin asked if there was anyone wished to speak at the public hearing, ano tpere were none. Re closen tete punlic Muaring at 2:13 p.m. 3. Case R 18-01 Req -utast to ru tone 5.66 acres out of Webbrouk abstract from Limited Office tEa) to Limned Commercial (LC). This request is for 21z valley view Koad. Ms. Kryztal James made a motion to approve. Ms. Lynda Cannedy 5ecundGd. Mr. Matthew Prouty presented the case to allow a recone of 5.66 ages of lana locate0 at 212 Valley View Road from Limited Office (LO) to Dmiten Commercial (LC). He stated ine applicants, IMorris anzl Mlisty Stone, were proposing the rezone in hcpe3 of con,,crtiny the md3tiny utrnctnr-, a former doctor's office, to a commercial daycare. Mr. Prouty Stated the applicants would alae be platting the property as well as seeking a conditional ase to operate a commercial daycare in a Limned Commercial err) zoning dislricl. Staff notified 12 parcels; 2 responded in favor, 'u in opposition, and 0 with no opinioniundecidea. i Mere were no responses received from outside the notificatior, area. Mr. Prouty skated staff recommended approval of the rezone at 212 Vailey view Road. CMairperson Mlartin asReo it me applicant was in attendance and ,,;shed to speak, and there Yeas no one present. Chairperson Martin asked if there was a, yone else in the acdience who vvi5hed to Speak, and there were none. Chairperson Martin opened the motion to discassion among tpe commission. Mr. Rick Graham pointer out Mat tnere was Generai Commercial (GC) r-cning both to the north and socth of the sub;ect property. He indicated that the entire area would eventually need to go that direction. The motion wab taken to a vote and carried unanimously. Public Hearing on 6305 & 6303 Southwo5t Parkway Rezone: Chairperson Martin opened the public hearing concerning the fezoning of a.zz acres of land, 6305 & Bs03 5oatMwest ParRway, from Single -Family 1 Residential (SF -1) to General CvmmerLial (GC). He opened the meeting to Somme, its from the public. Ms. Laurie Pullo-1k, 4713 Stansbury Lane, stated she and several residents of the single family neighborhood located just to the west of the proposed rezone Mad spoken and there were concerns that commercial development could result in traffiL, noise, and trash overflowing into their quiet neighborhood. Chairpar5on Martin asked if there was anyone wished to speak at the public hearing, and there were none. He closed the public hearing at z: 19 p.m. P A Z roIVIrAG_l0W PAGE 4 F-b-w^ry 14.:01 ° A. 'ase P 7 tt_f12 Qequnet in reY^__e 5.12 ai-rea frnMSingle-Family 'I Residential (SF -1) to General Commercial (GC) and amend f6 -e I -=d Woe eta= in r•hanga the area from Lew Densitv Residential to Commercial. This reque-f is for F305 & 6303 SouthwpCt Parkway, Ms. Krystal James made a motion to approve. Ms Lvnda Cannedv seconded. Ur. Matthew Prouty praconted the recd to rezone 5.22 acres, of land located at 6305 & rz2gz Izouthwest parkway from Single -Family 1 Residential (SF -1) to General Com=er,,�al (C -r'). d_ etnteri the applicants, Mr. David W. Park and Mr. Dol fglas Marchand, were proposing the re-7r+ne in order to rr_nte contiguous, GAoeral Commercial (GC) zoning on the two properties -,rd �11_w fnr commercial develnpmant along Southwest Parkway. He stated the Drior use of too property wac rhVrrh/re+igi_u- assembly. Staff notified 19 parcels; 1 responded in favor, 3 in opposition, and n with oa opinionfunderided. There were no res,pons,es received from outside the notification area. 0er. er,uty etntod th_t the adjacent properties to both the oorth and east of the s,ubjert property were zoned 22=erml r'=mmercial, and com=ercial us,ps Would be in harmony with the existing uses. He stated the prop^_ced 2rea --c directly adjacent to n Siogle- Farniiv Toning district to the west, but the subject property lac copnrnted from the cingle family uses to the west by an existing 20 foot allev. Ur. Prouty elated that in addition to the required 30 ft. s,eparation between rommercial uses and single fami'y residenti-'l uses,, the development would have to abide by the screening and buffering regulations outlined in Sention 4610 of the Zoning Ordinance, Mr. Prouty pointed ^Vt that the current Thornughfnr_ Plan did indicate an eXtencion of Allendale Road, located ''fire--tly acrccs gouthwect Parkway to the north, that Would run through the subject uroLlerty. He stated that c11011nngeC With attaining right-of-way acres,G across the BNSF railwav running along the sout"ern_ portion of the pnrce! wn_uld likely oeces,s,itate future changes to the Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Prouty s,tated staff recommended approval of the rezone and change of land use at Eg0r, & 6303 Southwest Parkway. Cbairperc__ U2rtin asLed if the appllrant was in attendance and wished to speak. Mr. Da ­ d ParL,, f209 9 Turtle r'ro21, pond, stated there had been a great deal of residentint develoi2ment in the area, but there was -� Incl, in ^n,1ani2ncaa. Ho s,tated the Subject parcel would be an ideal location to establish a variety cf ^_mmercinl ucec that would better serve the area than the current use. Chairuerson Uartin nc4er' if there war anyone else in the audience who wished to speak, and there were none. rhairperc^_= Martin opened the mntion to disrussioo among the rommission. Ct_airp_rso_n U tin asLed if the prn_perties flanking the s,ubjert to the west and the eas,t, 6323 and 6309 Southwest Par4w2y respectively, were currently Single-family or commercial uses. Mr. Proutv stated that E209 c^_uthwect Parkway was, nn existing commercial establishment and it was zoned General r cmmercinl (GC). He ct=t_d that 6323 Southwest Parkway was rurrentiv a sinole-family use in a Sing le-f=-mily I Residential (SF -1) zoning dis,trict. Mr. Rick Graham stated that the property was adjnrent to General Commercial (GC) zoning to the north and the oast, and the expansion of the General Commercial (GC) P r. Z r ;1V1M1IssIvN PACE 5 February 14, 2U10 zoning to dais parcel would be the natural ev;luticn to n growing sG�tion of the city. Chairveraon Martin atatud he believed the required screening, boffcring, and otmer development regalatior,s outlined in the z-Uning ordinance would prevent any future development from di5torbing the neighborhood to the west. i Me motion was taRen to a vote and carried unanirmously. V. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Subdivision/Platting Ordinance Revisions -- Mr. Dana Schoening atated staff would continue to worR with die tvortR Texas Homu Builders AJsociati�;n in order to pot together an ordinan= that yYc;uld meet the needs of both the City and the land duvulor,ers ai-, d other stskeholders. He stated the intent was to bring the orninance back before the Commission for recommendation to City Council at the April 11, 2018 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting, 2. City Council Updatea -- Mrs. Gagne eApressed gratitude to all the Commi55ion members vwho erprc55ed interest in serving as the Planning & Zoning Commission representative on the City's Landmark Commission. SMe 5tate0 EMe City Council had chosen to appoint Chairperson Rooney Martin to the position. Mr. James McKechnie gave a brief, legal overview of the upcoming bonta election in May. He informed the Commission that as official memMers or a City board ur commi55ion they were boonn Dy tpe same requirements ua City ataff in that they were !Being asRen nt-)t to discuss for or ugainst the proposed bunds. He stated any questions cunld bu directed tc the City's website. Mr. M,,Kcc;hnie stated a5 private individuals, not representing the Planning & Zoning Commi55ion, they were at liMerty to disiuss the bonds. VIII. ADJOURN i he meeting adjourned at 2:34 p.m. oy Martin, Chairpura0n ATTE _3 - Ze10 Date a 5uhoening, Dept. of Community Development Date